Amazed the politically correct vermin haven't demanded the removal of this piece due to it's "racism" in the title(They see it everywhere but where it's at it's worst) or at least it's renaming.
@scarlett24ca I'm not a brilliant pianist, but I can all apart from the section with a Tristan and Isolde imitation (1:20) till near the end of the section (2:00). Ragtime can be deceptively easy.
Love this kind of pianism... he is probably one of the better Debussy-performers cuz he grew up around the same time and therefore has similar musical influences. Nice to see late romanticism (Rachmaninoff) meets impressionism (Debussy).
it is impressionistic. To me, it's an impression of a quite challenging situation, where people would have the need to drastically do something in the process..
But hey, it was made as a ragtime song, but there still is debussy's impressionism in it.
Rachmaninoff had a mastery over the piano that few pianists in history can honestly claim to have wielded. I like that Rachmaninov put his own sort of spin on this piece, but it doesn't do it for me. Just a matter of personal taste.
nowhere in my comment did i say that debussy was romantic. i think you misunderstood what i wrote. what i said was debussy helped develop the style which CAME OUT of the romantic era, i.e. the romantic era inspired debussy's music, which is why you see so much romantic influence in his pieces. thankyou very much.
I'm a huge fan of Rachmaninov but I see what you mean. He does have that charming and blaise callousness about his playing. Not that I would know anyway, that's just how it seems.
Sounds like he's playing drunk, and doesn't give a shit. Wrong notes, wrong playing, wrong sustain here and there. What else? Maybe he was ready to get to that next bottle of wodka.
i'm pretty sure that rachmaninoff would have respected debussy greatly- after all they were both equally as important as each other in terms of developing the style of music that came out of the romantic period. both of them have created some of the most beautiful pieces we know today.
It would be interesting to hear Rachmaninov play "Chopsticks", but in this case I don't care for the interpretation...overpedalings and exaggerated rallentandi are some of the debits here.
the dynamic range does not show up on a recording of this quality. Even on home videos with modern cameras the range doesn't come off well. I have heard other recordings by Rachmaninoff where you can tell the piano is making a huge sound because of the way the piano sounds (it's kind of a sort of clanging but hopefully you know what I mean) but the recording only shows the same mf of the rest of the performance. I think it was the funeral march.
@isra2eelsharrmoutlak On the contrary, pianos from that era were arguably better constructed than today's mass-produced instruments. Who knows what Rachmaninoff had access to in that recording studio, though.
@ayso78 Im sorry but pianos of today are better than the olds and have a more quality sound. the ''better constructed pianos'' began only in the 40's and 50's
before the pianoshad a very poor sound quality, in the times of beethoven per exemple. in the time of rachmaninoff, they were much better but today they are much better too
Moreover, Pletnev recorded on Rachmaninoff's old Steinway grand and loved it, and he is certainly particular about pianos. He apparently favors Bluthners these days. At any rate, Rachmaninoff was playing on an upright in his early Edison Diamond Disc records.
Its a wonderful interpretation but if you listen carefully you can hear the piano roll turning in the backgroud, or it might just be a record player however it does not matter thanks a lot! :)
oh,yeah it`s him,unique rhythm effects,from the very beginning,and wonderful middle part,again amazing dealing with rhythm.this could be nobody else.rachmaninov is the greatest pianist,composer and conductor!
oag. i would have expected a more extraordinary interpretation, much like his "suck on it!"-stylish interpretation of schuberts impromptu op 90 no 4. like it! sounds very pure.
surprissed to noticed about this quite perffect interpretation, as my partner avobe has noticed, you can really know is rachmaninoff itself playing this masterpiece, a wonderfull curiosity
WOW Rachmaninoff playing Debussy! My respect for the genius increases twofold - thanks!!!
doroppulokkupoppu 1 month ago
Fantastic.
alinnman 3 months ago
Golliwogg APPROVES of this.
GolliwoggMusic 3 months ago 2
Marvelous interpretation!!!!
n64wilbert 5 months ago
magical...my kind of Rach music
peachmelba16 8 months ago
Rachmaninov!
TheBulgarianThunder 10 months ago
I'll never kno how he interpreted the last note :(
bcooly11 10 months ago
@bcooly11 Why not? It's in the recording…
LOTRzagorath 9 months ago
Amazed the politically correct vermin haven't demanded the removal of this piece due to it's "racism" in the title(They see it everywhere but where it's at it's worst) or at least it's renaming.
PhilK1231 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i play it better....
gemmaliantinis 1 year ago
@gemmaliantinis Hehhe... Sure.. :p
MrLinkoci 7 months ago
@MrLinkoci
sensitivities korkolis..
gemmaliantinis 7 months ago
Rachmaninoff totally owned this song
toadsEATbugs 1 year ago 4
This version has been very happy to me!!!
MarlitaLinda77 1 year ago 3
So quite! (Qué lindo)
MarlitaLinda77 1 year ago
Omw! I just listened to debussy play this piece and now Rachmonioff! They play this song so weird!!!
Oldladeesistahs 1 year ago
@Oldladeesistahs You must have been listening to the piano roll version that I just listened to?
Gangjoyful 1 year ago
Ugh! Are all recordings from this time period so awful???!!!
C3P0meetsData 1 year ago
@C3P0meetsData Some sound better than 21st century cell phones!!
n64wilbert 5 months ago
((((((((((( Thank You! )))))))))))
CurzonRoad 1 year ago
Joué avec humour et esprit. Il se passe bien des choses. J'aime beaucoup.
sdegrace 1 year ago
I am addicted to this piece now :O:O
dussekfan 1 year ago
Thank you for posting this marvel.
dialecticon 1 year ago
ok Rachy i will slow down the next time... ;op
lePistolero 1 year ago
For Chou Chou!
JanetteHeffernan 2 years ago
i've been working on this lately. it was an absolute nightmare to sight read! very different...
Ilovemusic326 2 years ago
I bet , I play piano and it sounds like a difficult piece. I really enjoy the contrast and would love to get the sheet music.
scarlett24ca 1 year ago
@scarlett24ca I'm not a brilliant pianist, but I can all apart from the section with a Tristan and Isolde imitation (1:20) till near the end of the section (2:00). Ragtime can be deceptively easy.
LOTRzagorath 9 months ago
genial !!!! maravillosa interpretacion .
josefin2minutos 2 years ago 4
I like Rachmaninoff's playing more than Debussy's! :-)
marialebed 2 years ago 9
Love this kind of pianism... he is probably one of the better Debussy-performers cuz he grew up around the same time and therefore has similar musical influences. Nice to see late romanticism (Rachmaninoff) meets impressionism (Debussy).
SixthSenseDeejay 2 years ago 2
Enough with the cliches - this is not impressionistic Debussy (bar the mid-section). It's Ragtime.
lyndenbarber 2 years ago
@lyndenbarber : It certainly ist !
3NUNS 2 years ago
it is impressionistic. To me, it's an impression of a quite challenging situation, where people would have the need to drastically do something in the process..
But hey, it was made as a ragtime song, but there still is debussy's impressionism in it.
ZeuhlEmgalai 2 years ago
@lyndenbarber
Well...can't it be both?
TheWanderingNight 1 year ago
@SixthSenseDeejay : Good comment!
3NUNS 2 years ago
Rachmaninoff had a mastery over the piano that few pianists in history can honestly claim to have wielded. I like that Rachmaninov put his own sort of spin on this piece, but it doesn't do it for me. Just a matter of personal taste.
DarknessHowls 2 years ago
I really miss this piece. I have to re-learn it
FluffiFish 2 years ago 2
I've never heard such a pianissimo in this piece! Bravo, Serge! And I loved the ending! All played "with great emotion."
TheMikester307 2 years ago 2
nowhere in my comment did i say that debussy was romantic. i think you misunderstood what i wrote. what i said was debussy helped develop the style which CAME OUT of the romantic era, i.e. the romantic era inspired debussy's music, which is why you see so much romantic influence in his pieces. thankyou very much.
halo3face 2 years ago
god love this song!!
kim66003 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rach sounds so bored. It is like he sight read this over breakfast the morning before he performed it.
(Sorry, nothing against Debussy, I still find this piece difficult.)
CodyNelsonMusic 2 years ago
Lmao, at first i thought you were dissing Rach for playing the piece so plainly.
PhoenixL1ght 2 years ago
I'm a huge fan of Rachmaninov but I see what you mean. He does have that charming and blaise callousness about his playing. Not that I would know anyway, that's just how it seems.
elevenwhy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As the musicians use to say, idiots cannot be cured, this is an incurable disease. Mr "Rach", please shut up!
Desideria7 2 years ago
Someone else seems to suffer from this disease. Please shut up!
XPJamieXD 2 years ago
Debussey plays this much better
penearth 2 years ago
of course, he wrote it!
sigsoundfan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sound like Rachmaninoff was a better writer than performer.
nebnubs 2 years ago
you shut ur dirty fucking mouth right now
Rachturne 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sounds like he's playing drunk, and doesn't give a shit. Wrong notes, wrong playing, wrong sustain here and there. What else? Maybe he was ready to get to that next bottle of wodka.
nebnubs 2 years ago
funniest comment yet
Cedarfaced 2 years ago
Tarado!
aniko66 2 years ago
how so? i like rachmaninoff. i have not heard much of his live recordings, but i'm guessing this is not one of his best.
nebnubs 2 years ago
Is it just me, or does Rachie sound a little bored?
Pianoplayer002 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Definitely--he doesn't care for this "trip to the candy store" bullshit Debussy
Liblibido 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
faggot
DeepSeaSeamus 2 years ago
i'm pretty sure that rachmaninoff would have respected debussy greatly- after all they were both equally as important as each other in terms of developing the style of music that came out of the romantic period. both of them have created some of the most beautiful pieces we know today.
halo3face 2 years ago 4
debussy is much more important in musical history! although i love Rach.
220392123 2 years ago
I love this song. =D
numberoneinline 2 years ago
is that good or bad?
pacoenigmatic 3 years ago
It would be interesting to hear Rachmaninov play "Chopsticks", but in this case I don't care for the interpretation...overpedalings and exaggerated rallentandi are some of the debits here.
soami2u 3 years ago 2
Are you saying that makes it worse?
D0g63rt 2 years ago
Well done I'm playing this song and I'm 12. I love it!!!!
phileokai 3 years ago
well done? I'm sure rachmaninov doesn't really care what any of us say...
vorbs1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i personally don't like this version...i think that he doesn't have a lot of dynamic range...but that's just me.
nikhilshinday 3 years ago
the dynamic range does not show up on a recording of this quality. Even on home videos with modern cameras the range doesn't come off well. I have heard other recordings by Rachmaninoff where you can tell the piano is making a huge sound because of the way the piano sounds (it's kind of a sort of clanging but hopefully you know what I mean) but the recording only shows the same mf of the rest of the performance. I think it was the funeral march.
VikingBerserker 3 years ago 21
@VikingBerserker before there were no high quality pianos like today
isra2eelsharrmoutlak 1 year ago
@isra2eelsharrmoutlak On the contrary, pianos from that era were arguably better constructed than today's mass-produced instruments. Who knows what Rachmaninoff had access to in that recording studio, though.
ayso78 1 year ago
@ayso78 Im sorry but pianos of today are better than the olds and have a more quality sound. the ''better constructed pianos'' began only in the 40's and 50's
before the pianoshad a very poor sound quality, in the times of beethoven per exemple. in the time of rachmaninoff, they were much better but today they are much better too
isra2eelsharrmoutlak 1 year ago
@isra2eelsharrmoutlak It's no secret why many American pianists were afflicted by career-ending hand injuries playing on Steinways made in the '80s.
ayso78 1 year ago
Moreover, Pletnev recorded on Rachmaninoff's old Steinway grand and loved it, and he is certainly particular about pianos. He apparently favors Bluthners these days. At any rate, Rachmaninoff was playing on an upright in his early Edison Diamond Disc records.
ayso78 1 year ago
is it just me or does rachmaninoff look like max schrek?
itsgud2bdking 3 years ago
He sure does in this video.
principalbass 3 years ago
Beautiful playing as usual.
cuentanuevanueva 3 years ago 2
I know it's ragtime, but any musician can hear the similarities.
mmcrosbie 3 years ago
BRAVO!!!!!
RoaCon 3 years ago 3
AWESOMENESS
emilysayshi1234 3 years ago 2
Brilliant!
sunlitporch 3 years ago
excellent
taotaoyingying 3 years ago
Just how incredibly refreshing is Rachmaninov's rhythmic style :)
mytchilla 3 years ago
this is funny, Rach. disliked debussy
vocalpianist 3 years ago
Its a wonderful interpretation but if you listen carefully you can hear the piano roll turning in the backgroud, or it might just be a record player however it does not matter thanks a lot! :)
Yaf0 3 years ago
It is obviously a phonograph record. The alternative would be what -- Sergei Rachmaninoff posting his own recent performances?
jsteeber 3 years ago 4
lol - Sergei live down the pub tonight - one night only!
dormi87 3 years ago 35
He'd have a stage name today. Something like Rock-Man Inoff, perhaps.
mclarke825 3 years ago 5
Haha, I like it!! Heh, that really made me laugh.. not great in university library but hey!
dormi87 3 years ago 2
I like Claude Debussy's own interpretation of this piece the best
Yaf0 3 years ago
There's something about Rachmaninoff's touch I prefer, and his lesser pedalling.
OverFjell 3 years ago 2
Fabulous piece!
utubeman6 3 years ago
jazz influence, right?
beauxsoir 3 years ago
Ragtime, actually.
pshanahan2002 3 years ago 2
Which is, of course, early jazz - Scott Joplin style.
mmcrosbie 3 years ago
thats rag
rockerduff1231 3 years ago
great interpretation but i prefer Michelangeli's interpretation
rvn10rvn17 3 years ago 3
What a great interpretation and how great to find it...
kamjoeski 3 years ago
because its beautiful and unforbidden. he plays it best as well.
leontud 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why Would He Play This Cakewalk?
Morahman7vnNo2 3 years ago
Why Not?
shanehennessyguitar 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Inferior Technique.
Morahman7vnNo2 3 years ago
nice...
igidid 4 years ago
i like to when rachmaninov play pieces of another compositor's
Psychosirius 4 years ago 4
oh,yeah it`s him,unique rhythm effects,from the very beginning,and wonderful middle part,again amazing dealing with rhythm.this could be nobody else.rachmaninov is the greatest pianist,composer and conductor!
mahpyua 4 years ago 4
But donť forgot on Debussy. He composed this great song
GiorgioniCZ 4 years ago 4
ofcourse,youre absolutely right.but since rachmaninov is my favourite in all these fields,i couldnt not mention what i feel.:)
mahpyua 4 years ago 4
actually it is called a piece, i didn't hear any singing...
thomasburtable 2 years ago
very nice.. a rare find surely
jeni323 4 years ago
You go boy!
willashland 4 years ago
hehe
cool
yoki33 4 years ago
oag. i would have expected a more extraordinary interpretation, much like his "suck on it!"-stylish interpretation of schuberts impromptu op 90 no 4. like it! sounds very pure.
123fakestr 4 years ago
surprissed to noticed about this quite perffect interpretation, as my partner avobe has noticed, you can really know is rachmaninoff itself playing this masterpiece, a wonderfull curiosity
arym666 4 years ago
interesting...
I do believe it is rachmaninov. The pedal effects in the end sounds quite 'him'...
yuanruan 4 years ago
you are right! there is his signature..
123fakestr 4 years ago