@e0000004 In no way do the Mythbusters test things scientifically, have you ever even watched the show? They are 5 people in the field of special effects who try their best, but unlike you think they have been proven wrong and been "debunked", in fact their are episodes showing them having to retest after receiving mail showing they were wrong.
If you think the Mythbusters cannot be debunked you are the Schizophrenic and need to see a psychiatrist. Your the conspiracy theorist now!
1º: It's a home-made video (very easy to make, just saying), make by some idiot that join your non-sense way of thinking...
2º: It's a trully moon video, but the "spider" isn't some liquid like oil? You see, the first moment of the video theres no spider. The liquid formed a drop and then falled. The low gravity of the moon explain the low-speed.
BEST PART ABOUT THE VIDEO IS,ITS GETTING PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT NASA AND THE BULLSHIT THEY CHURN OUT,PEOPLE ARE OPENING THEIR EYES TO THE FACT THAT MAYBE EVERYTHING THEY ARE BEING TOLD IS NOT THE TRUTH.HA HA!
THE VIDEO IS SAYING,HEY THIS LOOKS LIKE A SPIDER!!A SPIDER ON THE MOON IS GONNA EXPLODE,FAIR ENOUGH,IF THATS THE TRUTH!!
BUT WHO SAYS THEY'RE ON THE MOON ANYWAY?
IF THERE WAS A SPIDER,THEN THEY CANT BE.
UNFORTUNATELY THE VIDEO DOWNLOADED TO YOUTUBE TURNED OUT CRAP.BUT IF YOU GO ONLINE AND SEARCH FOR IT,THEN YOU WILL FIND THE ORIGINAL ,WHICH IS MUCH BETTER QUALITY.
@GayBoyRunning WELL DUH..answer me this..where was the plane in ANY of the hundreds of pics when it "supposedly" hit in Washington? and how did they know to ONLY hit the part of the place that was under construction and nobody was in it? tell me names of ANYBODY on the plane that hit it... didnt think so..ever wonder why?
@zybanday is there a list of all the people who died on the planes that hit the World Trade Center? All I hear about are the people who were in the tower- or the fire dept.
"The Big Lie". This theory states that no matter how big the lie is (or more precisely, because it's so big), people will believe it if you repeat it enough. Everyone tells small lies, Hitler reasoned, but few have the guts to tell colossal lies [source: Hoffer]. Because a big lie is so unlikely, people will come to accept it.
This theory helps us understand so many of the lies throughout history.
@nwopropaganda Doesn't mean that the people who fall for "the big lie" at one point refuse to look at the evidence, though. The evidence falls in favor the moon landing actually happening.
@CrackeTheSkull actually, the evidence of going to the moon lacks congruity. People refuse to believe the US government would actually fake a ML. It has nothing to do with hating the government or being paranoid. The truth is there is enough proof to show that it could have been faked on Earth. I am a truth seeker- I don't believe just b/c NASA said they went. I don't accept any of the evidence of going 100%. There are a lot of inferences today that NASA couldn't go then, and can't go today.
@CrackeTheSkull think about this point, too. countless people witnessed Jesus perform miracles. He walked on water, he turned water into wine, he healed the blind...etc. I know what Jesus meant by healing the blind, walking on water- but some believe he had godly power and could do it. Jesus was full of metaphors. I don't believe in the Jesus story.
Be a strong doubt boy or girl.
There are a lot of mislead and brainwashed scientists. Some scientists make countless mistakes and lie. U
I like the explanation, "I hear it was taken from an original TV broadcast of one of the apollo moon landings." Gee, that sounds authoritative! As if there was music during the "original" broadcast and this wasn't copied dozens of times. Anyone familiar with film telecines and other copy systems knows to look for vertical anomalies which usually come from junk caught in the film gate. Umm...isn't that FAR more likely than a spider?
Theirs a lot of nut jobs on u tube. Of course some are right, yes the workld is flat, god hates minor musical scales, their were witches at plymoth rock, the north pole doesnt actually exist, and Evel Knievals jumps where tv tricks, he did however break his bones with a buddy and a sledge for effect
There isn´t conclusive evidence of fake trip to Moon, I think the problem are the inconsistencies of theories; for instance: If a child was educated for believe that the solar system is billions of year old and besides that Moon was formed by millions of meteor impacts and igneous processes; then, likely the self-confidence of astronauts during walks could seem to him a little strange.
There is a moon conspiracy. The conspiracy is that the US government spent 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and in the process pushed the countries aerospace, computing, electronics and bio technology fields into such a ridiculously commanding lead that they have effectively led the world until now and in the process achieved one of the most stunning feats in the history of man and won world wide kudos doing so.
There you go dickheads, there's your conspiracy. Happy now?
That looks very much like a spider- I have about 30 of them living in my bedroom- and they do move exactly as seen dropping very quickly when startled thanks for the evidence.
Great video ....... absolute proof that the hoaxies have got nothing to add to the debate. Well done, keep it up, I look forward to the next empty film can. LOL
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz Best debunking will be to do it again with live digital video via Hubble. I even allow the use of latest technology to go to the moon.
dont see nything, i mean i believe 100% those dumb nasa pricks cudnt have gone to the moon with their 1950's bulshit technology thats just a joke, but this is just making the real proof seem like bulshit to, u shud remove this b.s
This is so convincing... by far the most evident proof that we did not go to the moon... I really enjoyed your presentation of the facts and the way you built your case... oh ! wait a minute... there were no facts, no case, nothing... damn !! another "look at my looser video crap" on Youtube. Get a life !!!!
I believe what he is talking about is at the very top of the red rectangle, for a split second it looks as if a white dot appears, possibly a spider, possibly not.
fake fake fake fake, and a big lie !!! no spider, just piece of some machine from authors home :D...just to have as many watchers as possible....how poor
-"hey you fuckwit you have now come to the attention of me - see my photo and know i am violent - and know i deal with nasa stooges VIOLENTLY"
-
-You know, I was going to assume you were some sort of fundamentalist religious tard because of your "beleive what I say or I will hurt you" attitude, but after reading your 3 conseccutive comments, I am going to assume you are a troll with no life.
generalhercules , I do not believe we went to the moon but I DO believe you are just a stupid fucked up dumb kid! Even without checking your profile, cause profile info proves nothing. IDIOT.STOP screaming as if you are "violent" .You may impress kids younger then you are with this, let's say 5 or 6 , but NOT persons older then 10!
@TannerJay250 I do not have to prove anything, NASA has...and they cannot....And they surely DID not by announcing there will be no moon expedition again.
@AwsomeAthiest , look back at my comment from 9 months ago , who is right after all?? ME, there's NO returning to the moon. Have a better one next time.Check the washingtonpost article/ 2010/01.
@Syphonaptera They spent millions on the project, built a new luner rover, and god knows what else, yet it was scrapped not by nasa but by obama.
Name to me one person from inside nasa who has come forward and said that it was a big hoax, there arnt any, only bullshit claims about videos of lense flares and suchlike.
Look up "bogosity lunar lunacy", the people preaching this shit are barefaced liers trying to make a quick buck, go get an education.
@AwsomeAthiest Oh boy, learn to get NASA out of the equasion cause they;ll do anything to keep their jobs, thus fundings. So, you claim NASA has the money, the resources the ability to launch the project? If so , than why should Obama,Aldrin and Armstrong denounce a new moon mission? The taxpayer already payed for it , so what is the reason for halting the project? People form NASA that reveiled it was all a hoax: Bill Wood, Space rocket engineer, worked on the Apollo project/ HP Arnold,
@AwsomeAthiest People form NASA that reveiled it was all a hoax: Bill Wood, Space rocket engineer, worked on the Apollo project/ HP Arnold,assistant MD to the Apollo Kodak films, Bill Kaysing head of technical publications for NASA/Rocketdyne. It is all in the doc Dark Mission!! Others, namely astronauts that were very sceptic about the Apollo moonproject mysteriously die, f.e. VIRGIL I. GRISSOM, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee, Thomas Baron. Ofcorse many call it just accidents
@generalhercules Stop waisting your time, you do not let others take you even a bit seriuos , even those charing your opinion, at least I would not mind if you left these flaming-sessions .
@generalhercules Stop waisting your time, you do not let others take you even a bit seriuos , even those sharing your opinion, at least I would not mind if you left these flaming-sessions .
Its going so fast and ends I cant see crap. What the hell are you talking about. Its all bull if any one bothered to watch myth busters you will find out all this crap you are accusing NASA of faking can be proven as fact they were there. From the shadow lighting and camera angles to the foot prints you think was wet sand. It also has one big surprise in the show that will undisputedly prove we were there.
you fuckwit i will sqash you -they will hear you beg from the internet -i will also smash your fucking house yoiu fucking cunt -the only way to deal with a liar like you is EXTREME VIOLENCE
Eh same way the rest of the world does but then again we dont ignore problems nor do we do half ass jop in world affiars or sit queitly and wait for the worse.
Damn, that spider was fast! See: 0:05 which looks pretty convincing to me. It helps to slow the video down because the spider only appears for three frames.
Personally I think that we never went to the moon. But there is 1 solution for this all..check with a telescope from earth and see if there is the American flag and the vehicle. JUST THAT SIMPLE
Its not simple at all, the moon is enormous compared to that flag and the landing module, the other most easiest way is for astronomers and scientists to shoot lazers from an observatory at the moon and reflect it off the retro-reflector left there by one of the Apollo missions, they tested it on mythbusters and did get a reading from the retro-reflector.
Your right, but that in itself is not proof that man walked on the moon or even landed on the lunar surface. Dont get me wrong, im intelligent enough to understand the evidence of the 12 people who landed on the moon as being indisputable but the fact that theres a retro-reflector on the surface only proves that theres a retro-reflector on the moon, nothing else.
Ever see any pictures of small objects taken from telescopes on Earth? Nooooo, because the moon is a quarter million miles away. Even the Hubble can;t break down anything smaller than 300 feet wide. Jebus get a clue.JUST THAT SIMPLE.
Hoax? Maybe you need to examine the photographs a bit closer and study the characteristics of the shadows cast off from the light of the sun, the ONLY light source available.
Did you see the LEM blast off without any rocket thrust? Why was there no dust covering the landing pads on the LEM? How come the flag was flapping in the breeze from the wind when there is no atmosphere on the moon? Why didn't that same wind blow the "moon dust" around? THIS NEVER HAPPENED! You need to get a brain, dude.
Holy crap, this flag thing pisses me off. It's not flapping, it's SWINGING. It's because of the lack of atmosphere, therefore the lack of air resistance, that the flag is able to swing. So it swings. Watch the mythbusters thing about it. Of course we fucking went to the moon.
its a vacuum you fucking idiot. In a vacuum there is no air resistance. Hence the prolonged flag waving after being adjusted. basic science you fuck tard
Sources of light on the moon- direct light from the sun, light from the sun that is reflected off the moon, and light that is reflected off the earth. That's three. Look man, I could believe all the scientists at NASA/Harvard/every other university, the 3,000 companies and 500,000 people that worked on the project, the 800 pounds of moon rock they brought back, the pictures from the LRO... or "LongIslandEddie".
You forgot one. Light reflected off of the astronaut's bright white space suits. A good example are the photos of Aldrin descending the LM ladder. Armstrong was standing in sunlight. Thus his brilliantly lit space suit provided the additional side fill light that we see in the photo.
This is the biggest piece of garbage I have ever seen! We did land on the moon before the Soviets. I know for a fact as most of the astronaughts habe passed away due to cancer. It's all the anti-government, anti-science, anti-space exploration asses that believe that there was no moon landing. If there was no moon landing, how could they have brought back lunar rocks? . How come moon rocks only have certain isotopes that CANNOT be reproduced on Earth? Obviously you theorists need to visit NASA!
omg if anyone belive itwas a hoax u should go to a doctor because u are retarded . To support my argument ican tell u i have seen the apollo 11 landing site from earth with a telescope how can u fake that u idiots .
How many ply of tin foil on your hat? According to the Whole Earth Catalogue, in order to maximize on the flux-field of your hat, you need to interleave strips of copper foil between the aluminum. Popular Theorist Magazine has an available set of plans for making a solar-powered model and if you send them a self addressed stamped envelope, they'll be happy to sent the blueprints to you.
Oh btw, for argument's sake let's just say there is a spider in this footage somewhere. Who's to say this wasn't filmed on the launch pad before liftoff?
HEY WHATS UP..LOOK ALL THESE VIDEOS ABOUT THE MOON ARE QUESTIONABLE. WHAT I NOTICE IN EVERY HOAX VIDEO IS THE GLARE OF THE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE TOP OF THE SUITS OR THE TOP OF THE FLAGS..WATCH CAREFULLY FROM 1:33-1:45. YOU'LL SEE LIGHT REFLECTING OF THE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE SUITS AND FLAG. WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT THAT. THIS IS ON "DID WE LAND ON MOON?- (Vol5)"
if it moved in the video, show me the video, besides when they are putting the flag into the ground causing it to move, or when they're blasting off, causing it to move
Well, there is a video where the flag moves slightly. One where the astronaut walks past and it moves slightly but you cant see anything when he walks past plus there are atleast 4 other distinct scientific explanations which could be used to explain the movement.
The conspiracy guy just knows its wind and atmosphere because he says its in a studio, which of course he cannot prove and has been beating himself to death for the past 40 years trying.
Nasa has had 12 people walk the moon okay? they went to the moon.... twice in 69, twice in 71, and twice in 72...... so how come they have not been back since? Please don't have a hissy fit im just asking, thanks.
Search moon landing hoax part 4 and watch it. the part that starts at the middle showing neil and his pals staging the shots of the earth "from the moon"
The moon landings were the culmination of a fraught space race between the Americans and the Russians. Both nations threw the kitchen sink at trying to get a man on the moon first. Now if the Americans were hoaxing the whole thing the Russians would have quickly latched on to the fact that none of the audio or video transmissions were actually coming from the moon. Why didn't they step forward and declare the whole thing an American sham and gloat about it for the next two decades?
Well that plus.... Bill Kaysing, originator of the moon landing hoax theory and author of "We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, also wrote these fine literary pieces. Eat Well for 99 Cents a Meal The Senior Citizen's Survival Manual The 99 Cent a Meal Cookbook Bill Kaysing's Freedom Encyclopedia Fell's Beginner's Guide to Motorcycling Eat Well on a Dollar a Day Hoaxtards' god, Bill Kaysing:-p Sibrel is his flunky, he's even less intelligent:-p
Lemming superhighway lol.. thats a good one, mind if I use it:-p
Well yea people can ask questions lol. Just be ready for all the reply's from more level headed people fighting this hoax nonsense coming mostly out of the uk and Australia and bashing the usa. Its offensive and ultimately none of it is even close to the truth.
Not a credible scientist on this planet backs this nonsense so be fair to yourself and read the other side thats all I'd suggest:
There have been some that hold doctorates that have raised questions about false photo's and extra lighting.
Perhaps the photo's were touched up. Who knows.
The only reason I see for fakery is if man cannot get through the Van Allen radiation belts that start 500 miles from the earths surface and extend for 10's of thousands of miles beyond that.
There have indeed been hundreds, maybe even thousands of independant studies of the photograph's in question including the Kodak company itsself, so far no one but a couple of left fielders selling conspiracy DVD's say it.
Current science concerning the Van Allen Belt is pretty much as it was when Van Allen was alive. Van Allen himself fought the CT claim that this belt was lethal to cross. The belt is dangerous and the apollo bio medical reports do show damage to the living astronauts.
Well, my cash will remain on the worlds scientific community who would be all over it if there were a problem.
Literally dozens if not hundreds of hoaxed images by conspiracists have already been debunked and exposed as fakes, common sense dictates that the next image with a so called anomaly will be yet another fraudulent attempt by the conspiracy camp and will once again be easily debunked.
Bill Kaysing, Bart Sibrel, Jarrah White, Ralph Rene are all liars, cheats USA haters! Simple...
If you can ever find the number of the questionable images I'd be really curious to see. It might look like this
"AS11-40-5946"
"Aldrin assembles seismic experiment".
I think we'll go to Mars in your lifetime, maybe mine. My kid who is 13 will get to be a part of that. I was 7 or 8 during the Apollo days I watched it all happen live on TV. It was so long ago now that people doubt its validity, its sad.
No doubt about it, man walked on the moon:-) We'll go back then you'll believe it.
Yeah, well I question some of those missions. No doubt the background of the mountains is from the moon, I question the lights on the visor, and the photo's of the sun that look different than the pictures of the sun from the space shuttle.
There are experts that say some of the photo's are defiantly photo shopped. And what do they gain? Nothing.
"There are experts that say some of the photo's are defiantly photo shopped. And what do they gain? Nothing".
The gain is two fold. One, the gain is in selling enough discrepancy through pseudoscience to get people to buy your DVD's and books ultimately.
And two, its political hatred. I've been debating UK'rs, Australians and Canadians for months and months now and finding it boilds down to hatred for Americans and NASA is a symbol which they know we hold dear because of Apollo.
"I've been debating UK'rs, Australians and Canadians.."
I'm not taking offence at all, but I'm an Australian. I thought Australians in general were a bit smarter than that. Shame it appears untrue. However I'm capable of believing it.. ;)
NASA have been in my life for the last 40 years. I look up to them and always will. I love space and space travel. Where would we be without NASA? I don't expect ESA to do better :)
I have stood corrected largely since I've said that Olly.. While there is a large portion of the conspiracists from those countries here on youtube it doesnt necessarily mean its ALL from there. I've spoken with and joined in with people from those very same nations who are just like you and I who dont deny science and common sense:-) I never did think anything less of these countries either, always liked them all it just seems when you look around there is a lot of it from there on youtube...
And BTW, no harm taken.. I deserve a bashing for stereotyping heh!
All of the nations mentioned also have some of the smartest people and science departments on the planet, no doubt about it.
I'm sure your science people would laugh at these hoaxtards just like ours do and I'm glad we all share the wealth of information coming from the space missions. We seem to be more international minded now days AND we are going again in 2020:-) Buckle in.. I cant wait!
BTW, I learned a lot about my astrophotography hobby from the ESA people and the European Hubble program. They have a wealth of information on post processing in fits liberator which is a Hubble process that has been adopted by the amateur astronomy community. I'm grateful too the ESA!!!
I dont think I'd say that Olly, after looking around you Australians are on top of your technologies and science just fine. You just have groups like we do here and the Europeans have them too, that are ignorant anti-government, anti-science types etc.. Mostly they seem angry to me more than they actually believe in a moon hoax.. Been debunking it for a while now and still dont get it fully other than they are all wrong.
Like I said, some Americans disappoint me too, you are not alone lol:-)
Had a guy telling me we couldnt make a proper glove for the Apollo astronauts in the 1960's the other day. He really believed it until I said.. "It seems odd that we could split the atom in the 1960's but we couldnt design a glove for the astronauts". I still dont think he's responded and its typical of the ignorance and lack of thinking.. I try to answer the ones who truly want to learn but many just get angry when presented with any science or fact, they want it mysterious and dark.
i hate it when people only type IN CAPS!!!!!!!!
Pat9201 3 months ago
@Pat9201 WHAT DO YOU MEAN?
awsomness360 1 month ago
The only thing fake is your wife's orgasms
charliegoodboy 3 months ago
now how the hell do you know its a spider?
2cool0 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio (dot) html
Cosmicmoron 5 months ago
dumbass
monokhem 6 months ago
Noone can debunk the myth busters. you conspiracy theorists need to go see a psychiatrist. Paranoid schizophrenia.
e0000004 6 months ago
@e0000004 In no way do the Mythbusters test things scientifically, have you ever even watched the show? They are 5 people in the field of special effects who try their best, but unlike you think they have been proven wrong and been "debunked", in fact their are episodes showing them having to retest after receiving mail showing they were wrong.
If you think the Mythbusters cannot be debunked you are the Schizophrenic and need to see a psychiatrist. Your the conspiracy theorist now!
DopeJedi 5 months ago
@thatamazinggeek my psychiatrist told me I should find something better to do... so I went and fucked your mother!
shanehoustein 6 months ago
well... there are two options:
1º: It's a home-made video (very easy to make, just saying), make by some idiot that join your non-sense way of thinking...
2º: It's a trully moon video, but the "spider" isn't some liquid like oil? You see, the first moment of the video theres no spider. The liquid formed a drop and then falled. The low gravity of the moon explain the low-speed.
Fake in both ways. :D
CacoButignol 7 months ago
What is this some shitty 70's space movie?
MrLostkause 7 months ago
Um, how is that a spider? It looks like dust, which space is full of.
Arnarkusaga 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thatamazinggeek
L
O
L
hahaha
bobsaget239 8 months ago
We've actually been to the moon and faked the moon landing.
cMARVEL360 8 months ago
@cMARVEL360 I agree LOL We had to be the first, that's why we faked the landing.
asakidesigns 6 months ago
I don't know what the footage is from, or what that is, is part of a battleship?
CimarronPeacekeeper 8 months ago
That was no spider you moron.
Just a bit of space dust.
ResiusOnline 9 months ago
Since when spiders own nitro?
musicResistances 9 months ago
LOL 0:01 so bored, when will it end?
kaderoder 10 months ago
i hate it when people think all americans are the same. to think that is just pure ignorance
stackerzgame14 10 months ago
HA HA MYTHBUSTERS,WAT A BUNCH!!!
acharlesc1 11 months ago
@acharlesc1 g
a
y
thelaheyshow 8 months ago
BEST PART ABOUT THE VIDEO IS,ITS GETTING PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT NASA AND THE BULLSHIT THEY CHURN OUT,PEOPLE ARE OPENING THEIR EYES TO THE FACT THAT MAYBE EVERYTHING THEY ARE BEING TOLD IS NOT THE TRUTH.HA HA!
acharlesc1 11 months ago
@acharlesc1
Its not the truth especially from obama.
MrTabby5000 11 months ago
THE VIDEO IS SAYING,HEY THIS LOOKS LIKE A SPIDER!!A SPIDER ON THE MOON IS GONNA EXPLODE,FAIR ENOUGH,IF THATS THE TRUTH!!
BUT WHO SAYS THEY'RE ON THE MOON ANYWAY?
IF THERE WAS A SPIDER,THEN THEY CANT BE.
UNFORTUNATELY THE VIDEO DOWNLOADED TO YOUTUBE TURNED OUT CRAP.BUT IF YOU GO ONLINE AND SEARCH FOR IT,THEN YOU WILL FIND THE ORIGINAL ,WHICH IS MUCH BETTER QUALITY.
acharlesc1 11 months ago
HA HA!!!!!!!WHAT DO YOU THINK,NOW YOU BROUGHT IT UP???
acharlesc1 11 months ago
so we guess 9/11 is fake too?
GayBoyRunning 11 months ago
@GayBoyRunning WELL DUH..answer me this..where was the plane in ANY of the hundreds of pics when it "supposedly" hit in Washington? and how did they know to ONLY hit the part of the place that was under construction and nobody was in it? tell me names of ANYBODY on the plane that hit it... didnt think so..ever wonder why?
zybanday 11 months ago
@zybanday well int time i will reply with the information but at this time i dont have that information to foward that remark.
GayBoyRunning 11 months ago
@zybanday is there a list of all the people who died on the planes that hit the World Trade Center? All I hear about are the people who were in the tower- or the fire dept.
nwopropaganda 11 months ago
@nwopropaganda I havent seen or heard of any list.
zybanday 10 months ago
"The Big Lie". This theory states that no matter how big the lie is (or more precisely, because it's so big), people will believe it if you repeat it enough. Everyone tells small lies, Hitler reasoned, but few have the guts to tell colossal lies [source: Hoffer]. Because a big lie is so unlikely, people will come to accept it.
This theory helps us understand so many of the lies throughout history.
nwopropaganda 1 year ago
@nwopropaganda Doesn't mean that the people who fall for "the big lie" at one point refuse to look at the evidence, though. The evidence falls in favor the moon landing actually happening.
CrackeTheSkull 11 months ago
@CrackeTheSkull actually, the evidence of going to the moon lacks congruity. People refuse to believe the US government would actually fake a ML. It has nothing to do with hating the government or being paranoid. The truth is there is enough proof to show that it could have been faked on Earth. I am a truth seeker- I don't believe just b/c NASA said they went. I don't accept any of the evidence of going 100%. There are a lot of inferences today that NASA couldn't go then, and can't go today.
nwopropaganda 11 months ago
@CrackeTheSkull think about this point, too. countless people witnessed Jesus perform miracles. He walked on water, he turned water into wine, he healed the blind...etc. I know what Jesus meant by healing the blind, walking on water- but some believe he had godly power and could do it. Jesus was full of metaphors. I don't believe in the Jesus story.
Be a strong doubt boy or girl.
There are a lot of mislead and brainwashed scientists. Some scientists make countless mistakes and lie. U
nwopropaganda 11 months ago
Only a no life would catch that
anthony65431 1 year ago
I like the explanation, "I hear it was taken from an original TV broadcast of one of the apollo moon landings." Gee, that sounds authoritative! As if there was music during the "original" broadcast and this wasn't copied dozens of times. Anyone familiar with film telecines and other copy systems knows to look for vertical anomalies which usually come from junk caught in the film gate. Umm...isn't that FAR more likely than a spider?
LunarTuner 1 year ago
Theirs a lot of nut jobs on u tube. Of course some are right, yes the workld is flat, god hates minor musical scales, their were witches at plymoth rock, the north pole doesnt actually exist, and Evel Knievals jumps where tv tricks, he did however break his bones with a buddy and a sledge for effect
guitargold77 1 year ago
condens water running down ... nothing else .... no spider ...
dirtyyyminds 1 year ago
no no no no the spider wouldve exploded or imploded wat happens on the moon/space?
theJRLMchannel 1 year ago
not gonna press link if its another 2 secs. this is waste.
TheGarcia350 1 year ago
a spider that lives in vacuum of space? ummm...
noxgenus 1 year ago
its chuck norris's spider...
Mr19841504 1 year ago
There isn´t conclusive evidence of fake trip to Moon, I think the problem are the inconsistencies of theories; for instance: If a child was educated for believe that the solar system is billions of year old and besides that Moon was formed by millions of meteor impacts and igneous processes; then, likely the self-confidence of astronauts during walks could seem to him a little strange.
Leivinn20 1 year ago
fukin huge spider...
smelinelly 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheStigma 1 year ago
@TheStigma what? Im only getting 2 seconds of video.. lol wtf
volvictonicwater 1 year ago
@TheStigma looks like that comment ended up on the wrong video. sorry.
TheStigma 1 year ago
Spider? Get the fuck outta here, you frickin' douchebag.
Silberdachs 1 year ago
Well, you convinced me
ReadMyCommentBitch 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is a moon conspiracy. The conspiracy is that the US government spent 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and in the process pushed the countries aerospace, computing, electronics and bio technology fields into such a ridiculously commanding lead that they have effectively led the world until now and in the process achieved one of the most stunning feats in the history of man and won world wide kudos doing so.
There you go dickheads, there's your conspiracy. Happy now?
DumbYankies 1 year ago
LOOK BOBBY!! DUST!!
wrylie188 1 year ago
That looks very much like a spider- I have about 30 of them living in my bedroom- and they do move exactly as seen dropping very quickly when startled thanks for the evidence.
calvinoism1 1 year ago
OH SHIT ITS A SPIDER! OR IS IT THAT UR AN IDIOT?
1Ledzeppelinzoso 1 year ago
PROOF!!!
Droidparty 1 year ago
8 legs freak!
JamesBisOlder 1 year ago
no im sure thats a whale........i can see its tail, at 1:43
renotuff 1 year ago
that would have to be one super spider to move that fast. this is fake
osiris6669 1 year ago
This is silly, every one knows that spiders came FROM the Moon!!! This is actually absolute proof that we went...
sixchiensblancs 1 year ago
kill yourself
Richard19706 1 year ago
Great video ....... absolute proof that the hoaxies have got nothing to add to the debate. Well done, keep it up, I look forward to the next empty film can. LOL
tpsossff 1 year ago
OH LOOK ITS ITS ITS........a lense flare -_-.
AwsomeAthiest 1 year ago
@dontdoitnow you're really need an education. All those "proofs" were debunked.
zzzIdividedbyzerozzz 1 year ago
@zzzIdividedbyzerozzz Best debunking will be to do it again with live digital video via Hubble. I even allow the use of latest technology to go to the moon.
kjb321321 1 year ago
dont see nything, i mean i believe 100% those dumb nasa pricks cudnt have gone to the moon with their 1950's bulshit technology thats just a joke, but this is just making the real proof seem like bulshit to, u shud remove this b.s
dontdoitnow 1 year ago
@dontdoitnow they went in 69' bitch
dudugrozavu 1 year ago
OMG! A SPIDER! AND I THOUGHT WE WENT TO THE MOON! WAAAAH!
TracyAndersonFoxhunt 1 year ago
wtf.. in that time camera's where shit, and even when they where on the moon,, wtf is your point??:O
TheGameHive 1 year ago
This is so convincing... by far the most evident proof that we did not go to the moon... I really enjoyed your presentation of the facts and the way you built your case... oh ! wait a minute... there were no facts, no case, nothing... damn !! another "look at my looser video crap" on Youtube. Get a life !!!!
mikethetv358 1 year ago
the generals profile says he goes to gladiator school !!!! lmao WTF!!!!!!
d4u2d0e 1 year ago
This is just a lousy lame trick to get us to the other website so we can be bombarded by their advertisements. This video is a waste of time!!!
starbird44 1 year ago
I believe what he is talking about is at the very top of the red rectangle, for a split second it looks as if a white dot appears, possibly a spider, possibly not.
ladychamberlainisit 1 year ago
I played your video at least 20 times and I don't see anything. You should find out how to indicate it with an arrow or a circle or something.
doireallyneed1 1 year ago
fake fake fake fake, and a big lie !!! no spider, just piece of some machine from authors home :D...just to have as many watchers as possible....how poor
TNTCZE 1 year ago
Uh... where is the spider?
rhughatkinson 1 year ago
moths love lights, especially from movie lights,at area 51 in the desert. Hell they;ll carry you away.
SuperHoneycutt 2 years ago
I cant see jack.
I think the reason is obvious they dont slow down, point it out, and zoom in, the spider doesnt exist, the moon landings happened.
boonw 2 years ago 3
hey you fuckwit you have now come to the attention of me - see my photo and know i am violent - and know i deal with nasa stooges VIOLENTLY
generalhercules 2 years ago
@generalhercules
-
-"hey you fuckwit you have now come to the attention of me - see my photo and know i am violent - and know i deal with nasa stooges VIOLENTLY"
-
-You know, I was going to assume you were some sort of fundamentalist religious tard because of your "beleive what I say or I will hurt you" attitude, but after reading your 3 conseccutive comments, I am going to assume you are a troll with no life.
You sir, are a fag.
boonw 2 years ago 2
I don't know who thie generalhercules guy is but he is defintely mentally challenged.
And "Nasa stooges''... oooh thats good. Been watching black movies or something?
This guy isn't violent. He's either fat or a geek. Thats why he can only come on here making such comments.
BarneyFlart 2 years ago
generalhercules , I do not believe we went to the moon but I DO believe you are just a stupid fucked up dumb kid! Even without checking your profile, cause profile info proves nothing. IDIOT.STOP screaming as if you are "violent" .You may impress kids younger then you are with this, let's say 5 or 6 , but NOT persons older then 10!
Syphonaptera 1 year ago
@Syphonaptera Give me some real proof and I'll listen.
TannerJay250 1 year ago
@TannerJay250 I do not have to prove anything, NASA has...and they cannot....And they surely DID not by announcing there will be no moon expedition again.
Syphonaptera 1 year ago
@Syphonaptera
"And they surely DID not by announcing there will be no moon expedition again"
And yet they have already said they intend to go back.....you should really research before you make silly claims.
AwsomeAthiest 1 year ago
@AwsomeAthiest , look back at my comment from 9 months ago , who is right after all?? ME, there's NO returning to the moon. Have a better one next time.Check the washingtonpost article/ 2010/01.
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@Syphonaptera They spent millions on the project, built a new luner rover, and god knows what else, yet it was scrapped not by nasa but by obama.
Name to me one person from inside nasa who has come forward and said that it was a big hoax, there arnt any, only bullshit claims about videos of lense flares and suchlike.
Look up "bogosity lunar lunacy", the people preaching this shit are barefaced liers trying to make a quick buck, go get an education.
AwsomeAthiest 10 months ago
@AwsomeAthiest Oh boy, learn to get NASA out of the equasion cause they;ll do anything to keep their jobs, thus fundings. So, you claim NASA has the money, the resources the ability to launch the project? If so , than why should Obama,Aldrin and Armstrong denounce a new moon mission? The taxpayer already payed for it , so what is the reason for halting the project? People form NASA that reveiled it was all a hoax: Bill Wood, Space rocket engineer, worked on the Apollo project/ HP Arnold,
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@AwsomeAthiest People form NASA that reveiled it was all a hoax: Bill Wood, Space rocket engineer, worked on the Apollo project/ HP Arnold,assistant MD to the Apollo Kodak films, Bill Kaysing head of technical publications for NASA/Rocketdyne. It is all in the doc Dark Mission!! Others, namely astronauts that were very sceptic about the Apollo moonproject mysteriously die, f.e. VIRGIL I. GRISSOM, Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee, Thomas Baron. Ofcorse many call it just accidents
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@Syphonaptera Show me them, along with there credentials, and ill believe you....
AwsomeAthiest 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AwsomeAthiest What about this: Go check it out yourself, do some own research, lazy wammy!
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@TannerJay250 Okay , you want me to prove NASA is no more going to the moon or what? be specific please.
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@generalhercules Stop waisting your time, you do not let others take you even a bit seriuos , even those charing your opinion, at least I would not mind if you left these flaming-sessions .
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
@generalhercules Stop waisting your time, you do not let others take you even a bit seriuos , even those sharing your opinion, at least I would not mind if you left these flaming-sessions .
Syphonaptera 10 months ago
Its going so fast and ends I cant see crap. What the hell are you talking about. Its all bull if any one bothered to watch myth busters you will find out all this crap you are accusing NASA of faking can be proven as fact they were there. From the shadow lighting and camera angles to the foot prints you think was wet sand. It also has one big surprise in the show that will undisputedly prove we were there.
wetone1962 2 years ago
you fuckwit i will sqash you -they will hear you beg from the internet -i will also smash your fucking house yoiu fucking cunt -the only way to deal with a liar like you is EXTREME VIOLENCE
generalhercules 2 years ago
hahahhahahaah,,,,, i must say i just checked generalhercules profile...
Its even worse than i thought.!!!! He lives in a trailer!!! hahahahahahahahahha pretty much explains everything.... lololololololololololol
I'm sure his experience in jail taught him how to play the guitar.. hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhah
Can't be too tough when your'e behind bars ahahahahahahahahah
BarneyFlart 2 years ago
Its a beam of light guys!
Galeati08 2 years ago
Thats not a spider. Its a small moth. And everyone knows there are moths on the moon.
BarneyFlart 2 years ago 2
i didn't know there were moths on the moon. thats crazy
spar87 2 years ago
So THAT'S where Mothra came from.
QuickdrawMcShaw 2 years ago
you are a fuckwit and i am going to bash your father until he begs and cries like a baby you fucking cunt
generalhercules 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why do americans always solve problems the cave man way?
Sn0wFreak 1 year ago 4
@Sn0wFreak
Eh same way the rest of the world does but then again we dont ignore problems nor do we do half ass jop in world affiars or sit queitly and wait for the worse.
But hey im just pointing out the obivious.
MoneyVSMetal 1 year ago
@Sn0wFreak he's australian, dumb :D...but you have truth about rude talking
TNTCZE 1 year ago
@Sn0wFreak Come over to the states and youll findout.
zybanday 11 months ago
@Sn0wFreak Because it saves us 15% or more on car insurance!
dwarfflambe 5 months ago
Exactly. What spider? All I see is a very brief video trace caused by frequency interference.
GoneToPlaid 2 years ago
Spiderman?
loonmaniac 2 years ago
Damn, that spider was fast! See: 0:05 which looks pretty convincing to me. It helps to slow the video down because the spider only appears for three frames.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago 2
lol the vid only goes for like 2 seconds
grk2meet 2 years ago
what spider ?
EsromFF 2 years ago
Personally I think that we never went to the moon. But there is 1 solution for this all..check with a telescope from earth and see if there is the American flag and the vehicle. JUST THAT SIMPLE
markbest17 2 years ago
Its not simple at all, the moon is enormous compared to that flag and the landing module, the other most easiest way is for astronomers and scientists to shoot lazers from an observatory at the moon and reflect it off the retro-reflector left there by one of the Apollo missions, they tested it on mythbusters and did get a reading from the retro-reflector.
DustHall13 2 years ago
It does help to prove a point, but the moons surface is still relatively reflective.
crogget 2 years ago
Your right, but that in itself is not proof that man walked on the moon or even landed on the lunar surface. Dont get me wrong, im intelligent enough to understand the evidence of the 12 people who landed on the moon as being indisputable but the fact that theres a retro-reflector on the surface only proves that theres a retro-reflector on the moon, nothing else.
cmomofilm 2 years ago
Ever see any pictures of small objects taken from telescopes on Earth? Nooooo, because the moon is a quarter million miles away. Even the Hubble can;t break down anything smaller than 300 feet wide. Jebus get a clue.JUST THAT SIMPLE.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
interesting stuff
luckyducky241 2 years ago
This video shows nothing.
Zoidberg227 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
flag this video
HoribiFuckis 2 years ago
Hoax? Maybe you need to examine the photographs a bit closer and study the characteristics of the shadows cast off from the light of the sun, the ONLY light source available.
Did you see the LEM blast off without any rocket thrust? Why was there no dust covering the landing pads on the LEM? How come the flag was flapping in the breeze from the wind when there is no atmosphere on the moon? Why didn't that same wind blow the "moon dust" around? THIS NEVER HAPPENED! You need to get a brain, dude.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
Holy crap, this flag thing pisses me off. It's not flapping, it's SWINGING. It's because of the lack of atmosphere, therefore the lack of air resistance, that the flag is able to swing. So it swings. Watch the mythbusters thing about it. Of course we fucking went to the moon.
QuickdrawMcShaw 2 years ago
its a vacuum you fucking idiot. In a vacuum there is no air resistance. Hence the prolonged flag waving after being adjusted. basic science you fuck tard
confusedhebru 2 years ago
Dude- EAT MY SHORTS!
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
The sun was not the only light source available dude... I don't know if you are aware of this or not, but the moon itself reflects a lot of light.
McMasterMarauder 2 years ago
Where do you suppose that the "reflected" light comes from? Tell me from what OTHER light source would the moon get reflected light?
I thought not, dude...
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
Sources of light on the moon- direct light from the sun, light from the sun that is reflected off the moon, and light that is reflected off the earth. That's three. Look man, I could believe all the scientists at NASA/Harvard/every other university, the 3,000 companies and 500,000 people that worked on the project, the 800 pounds of moon rock they brought back, the pictures from the LRO... or "LongIslandEddie".
McMasterMarauder 2 years ago 2
You forgot one. Light reflected off of the astronaut's bright white space suits. A good example are the photos of Aldrin descending the LM ladder. Armstrong was standing in sunlight. Thus his brilliantly lit space suit provided the additional side fill light that we see in the photo.
GoneToPlaid 2 years ago
Star light is another source, although not as bright as our own star. Do I win a prize, like a free week on the moon?
Starlifter88 2 years ago
Dude, your ON the moon already with that kind of thinking!
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
This is the biggest piece of garbage I have ever seen! We did land on the moon before the Soviets. I know for a fact as most of the astronaughts habe passed away due to cancer. It's all the anti-government, anti-science, anti-space exploration asses that believe that there was no moon landing. If there was no moon landing, how could they have brought back lunar rocks? . How come moon rocks only have certain isotopes that CANNOT be reproduced on Earth? Obviously you theorists need to visit NASA!
ducktape1232 2 years ago
omg if anyone belive itwas a hoax u should go to a doctor because u are retarded . To support my argument ican tell u i have seen the apollo 11 landing site from earth with a telescope how can u fake that u idiots .
maxpowerule 2 years ago
Are there any photos, from Earth?
Capnwabbit 2 years ago
i bet you have.
easydp 2 years ago
"Hoaxers are retarded" - agreed. "i have seen the apollo 11 landing site from earth with a telescope" - no you haven't
feelingfinethanks 2 years ago
The landing site not the actual thing. I have seen the landing sight, you don't even really need a telescope.
GamerPiiS360 2 years ago
How many ply of tin foil on your hat? According to the Whole Earth Catalogue, in order to maximize on the flux-field of your hat, you need to interleave strips of copper foil between the aluminum. Popular Theorist Magazine has an available set of plans for making a solar-powered model and if you send them a self addressed stamped envelope, they'll be happy to sent the blueprints to you.
LongIslandEddie 2 years ago
Sad how some people figure out how to use YouTube
nashvillespiker 2 years ago 8
hahahahahahahahahahaha
DAbears5 2 years ago
@nashvillespiker totally, what a waste of time!!!!
boazandjiacinth 1 year ago
well i dont see what the hell ur talking about ok buddy, put the 5th of vodka down and step away from the crack pipe
shitfacedrunkguy 2 years ago
your the one with the name shitfacedrunkguy...tool
DAbears5 2 years ago
Oh btw, for argument's sake let's just say there is a spider in this footage somewhere. Who's to say this wasn't filmed on the launch pad before liftoff?
floydfreak63 2 years ago
"....a spider crawling down a piece of equipment."
?????
Dude, step away from the crack pipe.
floydfreak63 2 years ago 5
I am not sure what it is that I am looking at or for here......Is it those two dots on the seat?
Anglovox 2 years ago
And... Putting that into perspective, the atom splitting technology was alrready almost 30 years old by the time we went to the moon:-p
Couldnt design a space glove indeed:-p
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
So you're saying we're watching Thunderbirds now..? Wires..?? Idiot.. They're antennas!
MrOllyK 2 years ago
HEY WHATS UP..LOOK ALL THESE VIDEOS ABOUT THE MOON ARE QUESTIONABLE. WHAT I NOTICE IN EVERY HOAX VIDEO IS THE GLARE OF THE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE TOP OF THE SUITS OR THE TOP OF THE FLAGS..WATCH CAREFULLY FROM 1:33-1:45. YOU'LL SEE LIGHT REFLECTING OF THE WIRES ATTACHED TO THE SUITS AND FLAG. WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT THAT. THIS IS ON "DID WE LAND ON MOON?- (Vol5)"
rhaugw 2 years ago
Antenna!
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
We need to find a new planet to live on so humans can move there after we have destroyed this one!!
CelestialWoodway 2 years ago 2
watch?v=4LFOBPGZBaU&feature=related
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
I was told the other day that "The flag moved in the video so its all in a studio".
The CT's love that bit of science! It sells video's and books.
And, many of them will defend that nonsense and fight tooth and nail over it even in the face of an intelligent argument?
"Reasoning"? From the CT camp?
Very little if any of that.
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
if it moved in the video, show me the video, besides when they are putting the flag into the ground causing it to move, or when they're blasting off, causing it to move
XxMagicmastaXx 2 years ago
Well, there is a video where the flag moves slightly. One where the astronaut walks past and it moves slightly but you cant see anything when he walks past plus there are atleast 4 other distinct scientific explanations which could be used to explain the movement.
The conspiracy guy just knows its wind and atmosphere because he says its in a studio, which of course he cannot prove and has been beating himself to death for the past 40 years trying.
Give up already conspiracy tards:-p
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nasa has had 12 people walk the moon okay? they went to the moon.... twice in 69, twice in 71, and twice in 72...... so how come they have not been back since? Please don't have a hissy fit im just asking, thanks.
MattWelshDude 2 years ago
Well......where is the source? And if this is the only one (next to the stupidious hoax of wires) I think Wookanay makes himself a good hoaxtard.
dopje31857 2 years ago
Search moon landing hoax part 4 and watch it. the part that starts at the middle showing neil and his pals staging the shots of the earth "from the moon"
SWORDZDADDY 2 years ago
The moon landings were the culmination of a fraught space race between the Americans and the Russians. Both nations threw the kitchen sink at trying to get a man on the moon first. Now if the Americans were hoaxing the whole thing the Russians would have quickly latched on to the fact that none of the audio or video transmissions were actually coming from the moon. Why didn't they step forward and declare the whole thing an American sham and gloat about it for the next two decades?
dopje31857 2 years ago 4
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago 5
So what? A man can't ask questions on the Lemming superhighway?
Verlch 2 years ago
Lemming superhighway lol.. thats a good one, mind if I use it:-p
Well yea people can ask questions lol. Just be ready for all the reply's from more level headed people fighting this hoax nonsense coming mostly out of the uk and Australia and bashing the usa. Its offensive and ultimately none of it is even close to the truth.
Not a credible scientist on this planet backs this nonsense so be fair to yourself and read the other side thats all I'd suggest:
clavius (dot) org
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
There have been some that hold doctorates that have raised questions about false photo's and extra lighting.
Perhaps the photo's were touched up. Who knows.
The only reason I see for fakery is if man cannot get through the Van Allen radiation belts that start 500 miles from the earths surface and extend for 10's of thousands of miles beyond that.
Verlch 2 years ago
There have indeed been hundreds, maybe even thousands of independant studies of the photograph's in question including the Kodak company itsself, so far no one but a couple of left fielders selling conspiracy DVD's say it.
Current science concerning the Van Allen Belt is pretty much as it was when Van Allen was alive. Van Allen himself fought the CT claim that this belt was lethal to cross. The belt is dangerous and the apollo bio medical reports do show damage to the living astronauts.
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Also, read about the radiation belt at clavius, its solid science and no one on youtube is near qualified to dispute it.
Although Jarrah White would probably have you think he is qualified... You should see this guy's twisted science, Cuckoo:-p
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Yeah some of it is out there, but some of those who challenge the official version have doctorates in say, photography for instance.
There are some obvious doctoring to photo's, what is the reason, is my question.
Verlch 2 years ago
Well, my cash will remain on the worlds scientific community who would be all over it if there were a problem.
Literally dozens if not hundreds of hoaxed images by conspiracists have already been debunked and exposed as fakes, common sense dictates that the next image with a so called anomaly will be yet another fraudulent attempt by the conspiracy camp and will once again be easily debunked.
Bill Kaysing, Bart Sibrel, Jarrah White, Ralph Rene are all liars, cheats USA haters! Simple...
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Some of the photos are right out of NASA achieves. It is possible the first few were faked to give us time to get there for real.
THe moon really isn't that far away. Now Mars is far away, travel time of a year. That would be sick if we got there.
Verlch 2 years ago
If you can ever find the number of the questionable images I'd be really curious to see. It might look like this
"AS11-40-5946"
"Aldrin assembles seismic experiment".
I think we'll go to Mars in your lifetime, maybe mine. My kid who is 13 will get to be a part of that. I was 7 or 8 during the Apollo days I watched it all happen live on TV. It was so long ago now that people doubt its validity, its sad.
No doubt about it, man walked on the moon:-) We'll go back then you'll believe it.
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Yeah, well I question some of those missions. No doubt the background of the mountains is from the moon, I question the lights on the visor, and the photo's of the sun that look different than the pictures of the sun from the space shuttle.
There are experts that say some of the photo's are defiantly photo shopped. And what do they gain? Nothing.
Verlch 2 years ago
"There are experts that say some of the photo's are defiantly photo shopped. And what do they gain? Nothing".
The gain is two fold. One, the gain is in selling enough discrepancy through pseudoscience to get people to buy your DVD's and books ultimately.
And two, its political hatred. I've been debating UK'rs, Australians and Canadians for months and months now and finding it boilds down to hatred for Americans and NASA is a symbol which they know we hold dear because of Apollo.
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Sorry.. I mean you no harm..
"I've been debating UK'rs, Australians and Canadians.."
I'm not taking offence at all, but I'm an Australian. I thought Australians in general were a bit smarter than that. Shame it appears untrue. However I'm capable of believing it.. ;)
NASA have been in my life for the last 40 years. I look up to them and always will. I love space and space travel. Where would we be without NASA? I don't expect ESA to do better :)
MrOllyK 2 years ago
I have stood corrected largely since I've said that Olly.. While there is a large portion of the conspiracists from those countries here on youtube it doesnt necessarily mean its ALL from there. I've spoken with and joined in with people from those very same nations who are just like you and I who dont deny science and common sense:-) I never did think anything less of these countries either, always liked them all it just seems when you look around there is a lot of it from there on youtube...
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
And BTW, no harm taken.. I deserve a bashing for stereotyping heh!
All of the nations mentioned also have some of the smartest people and science departments on the planet, no doubt about it.
I'm sure your science people would laugh at these hoaxtards just like ours do and I'm glad we all share the wealth of information coming from the space missions. We seem to be more international minded now days AND we are going again in 2020:-) Buckle in.. I cant wait!
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
BTW, I learned a lot about my astrophotography hobby from the ESA people and the European Hubble program. They have a wealth of information on post processing in fits liberator which is a Hubble process that has been adopted by the amateur astronomy community. I'm grateful too the ESA!!!
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
No harm done whatsoever. I don't think you were stereotyping at all. I just thought Australians were a bit smarter.. appears not.. sadly. Oh well.. :)
It's about time Europe got into the space race. Can't have NASA taking the whole show everytime. I'm more worried about China and North Korea tho..
MrOllyK 2 years ago
I dont think I'd say that Olly, after looking around you Australians are on top of your technologies and science just fine. You just have groups like we do here and the Europeans have them too, that are ignorant anti-government, anti-science types etc.. Mostly they seem angry to me more than they actually believe in a moon hoax.. Been debunking it for a while now and still dont get it fully other than they are all wrong.
Like I said, some Americans disappoint me too, you are not alone lol:-)
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago
Had a guy telling me we couldnt make a proper glove for the Apollo astronauts in the 1960's the other day. He really believed it until I said.. "It seems odd that we could split the atom in the 1960's but we couldnt design a glove for the astronauts". I still dont think he's responded and its typical of the ignorance and lack of thinking.. I try to answer the ones who truly want to learn but many just get angry when presented with any science or fact, they want it mysterious and dark.
guitarplayer4real 2 years ago 2