At f22 no chance to survive against su35 mb! su35 has radar IRBIS per 100 km further than f22.su35 has the highest degree of flexibility. f22 shit metal for suicide
@romul122 umm...the AN/APG-77v1 can detect a 1m2 target at a distance of 240km, the Irbis-E can detect a >3<m2 target from 350-400km away, meaning against a 3m2 target the AN/APG-77v1 would CONSIDERABLY outrange the Irbis-E, not to mention it can detect more than twice as many targets at one time, and has a much higher jamming capability and a much lower susceptibility to jamming than the Irbis-E. the F-22 is superior in every conceivable parameter(except flight range).
If you want to compare the F-22 to an active/production fighter of its same generation, its impossible because there isnt another 5th Gen fighter in production/service
@GOAF2014 Well,it is possible,but as i said,a bit wrong.They are different generation fighters,each one involving different technologies and design philosphy.The F-22 is a 5th generation air superiority fighter,while the Su-35 is a 4th generation multirole fighter.
@gtamodman122 the design of the Su-35 is based off the Su-27, which is an air-superiority fighter by every sense of the definition. the only reason the russians call the Su-35 a "multirole" fighter is because it can cary bombs, but the F-22 can also do this. either way the Su-35 IS an air-superiority fighter by definition.
You forgot one thing. BM's radar can detect stealth aircraft up to 90km away. It's means that stealth bomber like B-2 (maybe F-35 too) and U(C)AV will be closer to danger than it was.
F-22 radar cannot detect stealth aircraft, so what do you think if some nation copied B-2 (that accidentialy absolutely right as the blueprint and internal design) and use them against the US?
Good vid but for western aircraft I like F-15 Series more than F-22 because it had proven itself with 104-0 score.
@MiG359NTF The Su-35BM's RCS Detection is stated at .01 m. That's one 0 short of the F-22A's stated .001 RCS.Also, this claim has not yet been tested. That is a spec of what the manufacturer is aiming for. Also, this is a detection range of 90 km/56 miles. The AN/APG-77 AESA has a tested and comfirmed detection range for an aircraft of 1m RCS at 225 kilometers/140 miles. (Sorry Im American So I Have To Put Everything In Miles To Fully Understand The Distance)
@Santor6 The F-22 turns are very tight, and there's really not much cavity to work with if your fighting it. The BM is amazingly manouverable, Ill admit, but theyre so close together, it would come down to the pilot. Also as for the missiles, the AMRAAM is more manouverable and despite having a shorter range, the BM cant see the F-22 and if it did, you never fire at Max Range
Fighter F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAAM 120.
F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAM.
F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAM .
MADE IN RUSSIA
JamesMovingTarget 3 weeks ago
Really good comparison but when you get down to these fighters its the pilot that wins.
p.s. Technology and performance are 2 different things.
thatoneguy12ize 3 weeks ago
At f22 no chance to survive against su35 mb! su35 has radar IRBIS per 100 km further than f22.su35 has the highest degree of flexibility. f22 shit metal for suicide
romul122 5 months ago
@romul122 umm...the AN/APG-77v1 can detect a 1m2 target at a distance of 240km, the Irbis-E can detect a >3<m2 target from 350-400km away, meaning against a 3m2 target the AN/APG-77v1 would CONSIDERABLY outrange the Irbis-E, not to mention it can detect more than twice as many targets at one time, and has a much higher jamming capability and a much lower susceptibility to jamming than the Irbis-E. the F-22 is superior in every conceivable parameter(except flight range).
hotpocketpoison 4 days ago
SUKHOI SU-35 THE BESSST !!!!!!! REAL TRUST VECTOR CONTROL IN ANY DIRECTION NOT LIKE THE F22 CRAPTOR WITH ONLY UP & DOWN NUZZLE CONTROL
1998MASSINISSA 5 months ago
Su-35 is dead already before take off ,
F-22 is faaaar superior.
ViciousCritique 6 months ago
F-15 Plus vs Su-35BM!!!!
vfIskullangel 7 months ago
btw,the comparison is a bit wrong.The -35BM is classified as a 4++ generation fighter,but the F-22 is classified as a 5th.
gtamodman122 9 months ago
@gtamodman122 And how is it wrong?
If you want to compare the F-22 to an active/production fighter of its same generation, its impossible because there isnt another 5th Gen fighter in production/service
GOAF2014 9 months ago
@GOAF2014 Well,it is possible,but as i said,a bit wrong.They are different generation fighters,each one involving different technologies and design philosphy.The F-22 is a 5th generation air superiority fighter,while the Su-35 is a 4th generation multirole fighter.
gtamodman122 9 months ago
@gtamodman122 the design of the Su-35 is based off the Su-27, which is an air-superiority fighter by every sense of the definition. the only reason the russians call the Su-35 a "multirole" fighter is because it can cary bombs, but the F-22 can also do this. either way the Su-35 IS an air-superiority fighter by definition.
hotpocketpoison 3 days ago
@hotpocketpoison uhh, I know that.
gtamodman122 3 days ago
@gtamodman122 BVR Raptor wins. Close combat su35.
eulereix 7 months ago
I think I'll go for the Su-35.The F-22 is great too though
gtamodman122 10 months ago
You forgot one thing. BM's radar can detect stealth aircraft up to 90km away. It's means that stealth bomber like B-2 (maybe F-35 too) and U(C)AV will be closer to danger than it was.
F-22 radar cannot detect stealth aircraft, so what do you think if some nation copied B-2 (that accidentialy absolutely right as the blueprint and internal design) and use them against the US?
Good vid but for western aircraft I like F-15 Series more than F-22 because it had proven itself with 104-0 score.
MiG359NTF 10 months ago
@MiG359NTF The Su-35BM's RCS Detection is stated at .01 m. That's one 0 short of the F-22A's stated .001 RCS.Also, this claim has not yet been tested. That is a spec of what the manufacturer is aiming for. Also, this is a detection range of 90 km/56 miles. The AN/APG-77 AESA has a tested and comfirmed detection range for an aircraft of 1m RCS at 225 kilometers/140 miles. (Sorry Im American So I Have To Put Everything In Miles To Fully Understand The Distance)
GOAF2014 10 months ago
Both Jets are sexy like horny Bitches!
Scheltokeeper 11 months ago
Comment removed
Santor6 1 year ago
@Santor6 The point of that vid was??
ACX2008 1 year ago
Fighter F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat.
Santor6 1 year ago
@Santor6 The F-22 turns are very tight, and there's really not much cavity to work with if your fighting it. The BM is amazingly manouverable, Ill admit, but theyre so close together, it would come down to the pilot. Also as for the missiles, the AMRAAM is more manouverable and despite having a shorter range, the BM cant see the F-22 and if it did, you never fire at Max Range
ACX2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fighter F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAAM 120.
Santor6 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAM.
Santor6 1 year ago
F-22 has to much cavity on short turns vs Su 35BM. It is obvious and potentialy disandvatage in close combat. And on middle range combat ATOL missiles are superior vs AMRAM .
Santor6 1 year ago
awesome ( :
USAFJacob 1 year ago