so what? eastern karelia belonged to russia even when there was no finland state/autonomy in any form. do you really think that russians will give you eastern karelia just because some retards yelling? the swedes have more rights on your western coast than you guys.
Russia and Finland really don't care about Karelia, as it's said it's old nostalgic crying, Finns, you never will have it!
Instead wishing someday that the land of my ancestors will be independet, not part of Russia nor Finland. Suomalaisista pieni osa asui "luovutettujen" alueiden puolella, joten se ei koskaan ollut, eikä tule olemaan Suomen provinssi. Karjala itsenäiseksi!
Adressit.comissa voi käydä allekirjoittamassa vetoomuksen itsenäisen Karjalan puolesta
why do you guys cry it somwhere in Finland? Go close to Kremlin walls and cry it here, as we "vitun ryssät" do when we want something from Kremlin motherfuckers. No dare? Then shut up!
send all ryssät into jails and concentration camps, as you did in 1941 when seized petroskoi? why no? "civilized" people allowed to do this, only "evil russian savages" should be blamed for it even decades after
Well, it was Russia who first attacked Finland in 1939, so...
Naja, of course that doesn't justify the Finnish actions in the Russian Karelia (which has never been part of Finland, unlike the Karelian Isthmus and a part of Ladoga Karelia)...
olin pitkään samaa mieltä kunnes aloin ajatella että mitä me niillä mailla.. ne on raiskattu ja venäläiset on ne saastuttaneet.. vaikka toisaalta on kai sielä puhdastakin metsää vielä jossainmäärin.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Aina saa toivoa! Mitä me sillä paskamaalla oikein tehtäisiin? Jos sinne ei voi rakentaa edes kylmäasemaa nin miksi helvetissä se takaisin pitäisi saada? Ei meillä sille mitään käyttöä ole joten nielkää nyt rakkaat hupsut sitten lohdutukseksi edes pullollinen sitä teidän karjalaanne.
Paskat sulla on housuissasi. Et selvästikään tunne aluetta etkä muutenkaan asiasta hevon vittua joten pitäisitkö turpasi kiinni ettet vaikuttaisi täys-imbesilliltä?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
u think finland really will return viborg or sortavala? and russia just generously will gives its territory to you? i think you are real stupid person...(
and, as i know, there are lives not finns, but karelians, who has big HISTORICAL connect with russians. and they are orthodoxes.
So who is stupid? HAH. You come here and say that you have historical connections to Karelia. You are a funny guy. That area has always been finnish or finnish related. Ok read history about those areas, if you have lived there about 60 years you think those areas belong to you. Just guess how long we have lived there?!?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i have read history, and i sugget to you read it too. karelia was a part of novgorod republic since 12 century and karelians and russian lived together. i cant say the same about karelo-finnish relations.
karelia never belonged to finland, because it belonged to russia from times of Novgorod Feudal Republic to present days. But finland occupied karelia in short period of WWII.
maybe hot finnish guys still want to occupy sortavala or vyborg???)
It's sad how little history you know. Karelia was part of Finland from 1918 to 1945, originally recognized as a traditionally Finnish land by the Bolsheviks. For crying out loud, the damn Kalevala was based on Karelian songs. It was the USSR that invaded and took it from Finland in an unprovoked war of aggression--which was solidified by Stalin's friendship with the Nazi regime in 1939. Use your head.
about what karelia you talking? about little region of vyborg? i thought you talking about all karelia)))...sorry, but i think you are not fool for want it back...
The proper name of the city is Viipuri. There are also lands in the Northeast. The Karelia that Finland legally owned prior to 1945 included much of the NW banks of Lake Ladoga. RE: larger Karelia: Separating Finns from Karelians is largely a fantasy of postwar Soviet propaganda. They are like brothers ethnically and linguistically. The vast majority of Russians moved there after 1945 to justify the WWII invasion. Karelians have overwhelming asked to be part of Finland, and Stalin knew it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
in 1926 russians were 57% of population, so, dont fuck my brains. also karelia was a part of russian principalities(like novgorod) by centuries. and original name of the city is vyborg, not viipuri. and karelians always were in enmity with emi's because karels are were orthodoxes.
Right, and how many of them lived in Petrozavodsk? Do you even know what gerrymandering is? Finland has no claim over those cities founded by Peter the Great. He built them to push Finnic peoples out of Karelia and away from St Petersburg, but Russian penetration of the Karelian interior is a postwar artifact. Hell, the majority of Viipuri is Russian now, but it was a purely Finnish town in 1944.
If you move millions of Ukrainians into Karelia, of course there's going to be a majority of "Russian-speakers" there. If religion determines who gets what land, then why weren't the Baltic states part of Finland (as part of the states of Catholic crusaders)? Your arguments have no merit, and are a byproduct of Soviet propaganda.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ukrainians? in ukrainians are 2.7% of population of karelia. russians lived in karelia from early medieval (in finland we lived too). finland was a part of sweden.
Many of the "Russians" who moved to places like Petrozavodsk under Peter I were from the area that is now Ukraine. Now they are considered "Russians." Karelians lived and traded in Novgorod since before the arrival of the Slavs, but Finns aren't so stupid as to claim it is "Finnish land," unlike Russian claims over Karelia ... Go to Viipuri/Karelia and see that all of the old buildings are Finno-Karelian.
Karelian Isthmus and part of Ladoga Karelia BELONGED to Finland before 1939. Check your history, man... Sortavala and Vyborg were Finnish towns, in fact Vyborg was Finland's second largest town back then...
Comment removed
ReineN911 11 months ago
so what? eastern karelia belonged to russia even when there was no finland state/autonomy in any form. do you really think that russians will give you eastern karelia just because some retards yelling? the swedes have more rights on your western coast than you guys.
mihanich 1 year ago
Suomensukuisia alueita ollu ja tulee olemaan joten sais Venäjä ne kyllä puhisttetuna palauttaa!
Jukazar 2 years ago 5
You never get it back, old dumbheads)) You was fighting so bad))
Grigoryxxx 2 years ago
Russia and Finland really don't care about Karelia, as it's said it's old nostalgic crying, Finns, you never will have it!
Instead wishing someday that the land of my ancestors will be independet, not part of Russia nor Finland. Suomalaisista pieni osa asui "luovutettujen" alueiden puolella, joten se ei koskaan ollut, eikä tule olemaan Suomen provinssi. Karjala itsenäiseksi!
Adressit.comissa voi käydä allekirjoittamassa vetoomuksen itsenäisen Karjalan puolesta
finnish 2 years ago
400 000 ihmistä oli sen ajan Suomessa aika iso luku.
Mikey84 1 year ago
why do you guys cry it somwhere in Finland? Go close to Kremlin walls and cry it here, as we "vitun ryssät" do when we want something from Kremlin motherfuckers. No dare? Then shut up!
murienrouge 2 years ago
Comment removed
dormeator 2 years ago
entäs siel 400 000 asuvaa ryssää? näinkö iloisesti otettais ne meidän kansalaisiks vai
FinnFoxx 2 years ago 6
send all ryssät into jails and concentration camps, as you did in 1941 when seized petroskoi? why no? "civilized" people allowed to do this, only "evil russian savages" should be blamed for it even decades after
murienrouge 2 years ago
Well, it was Russia who first attacked Finland in 1939, so...
Naja, of course that doesn't justify the Finnish actions in the Russian Karelia (which has never been part of Finland, unlike the Karelian Isthmus and a part of Ladoga Karelia)...
Mikey84 1 year ago
Eivät ole ryssiä, ovat inkeriläisiä ja karjalaisia, eivät venäläisiä.
DaBoomz13 1 year ago
Ruotsihan voisi samalla logiikalla vaatia Suomea takaisin vanhaan yhteyteensä.
Ruotsilla ja Suomen maakunnillahan on vielä pidempi historia yhtenäisenä alueena kuin Suomella ja Karjalalla.
Toki pidän Karjalan valtausta vääryytenä, se mainittakoon.
nkeli 2 years ago 3
Karjala takasi vaikka pullo kerralla perkele!
Mannerheim96 2 years ago 6
onks tää tampereelta???
monoman4 2 years ago
repes tuol lopus :D
4sxx 2 years ago 2
Haha hauska toi partajäbä :D
Hernesaho 3 years ago 2
olin pitkään samaa mieltä kunnes aloin ajatella että mitä me niillä mailla.. ne on raiskattu ja venäläiset on ne saastuttaneet.. vaikka toisaalta on kai sielä puhdastakin metsää vielä jossainmäärin.
Suomiapina 3 years ago 5
fuck off, pukkinen. punks rnt dead.
mihanich 3 years ago
Hyvää asiaa ajavat!
antt1r 3 years ago 6
toi pappa päätti pistää paremmaks tos lopus :D tollane helevetinmoine banderolli mitä se ei oikee hallitse
Kahvelisika 3 years ago 12
Karjala takaisin, vaikka tölkki kerrallaan taanana!!
xylex81 3 years ago
Muute jaksavat noi jotkut vanhukset itkee siit et haluavat karjalan takasin vaik ei se yhtää huonokaa juttu ois :|
jjk1994 3 years ago
Russian propaganda...
UnholyVilius 3 years ago
True.
TheCrazyFinn 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Aina saa toivoa! Mitä me sillä paskamaalla oikein tehtäisiin? Jos sinne ei voi rakentaa edes kylmäasemaa nin miksi helvetissä se takaisin pitäisi saada? Ei meillä sille mitään käyttöä ole joten nielkää nyt rakkaat hupsut sitten lohdutukseksi edes pullollinen sitä teidän karjalaanne.
Lotus1234554321 3 years ago
Paskat sulla on housuissasi. Et selvästikään tunne aluetta etkä muutenkaan asiasta hevon vittua joten pitäisitkö turpasi kiinni ettet vaikuttaisi täys-imbesilliltä?
Bartlolomew 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u think finland really will return viborg or sortavala? and russia just generously will gives its territory to you? i think you are real stupid person...(
and, as i know, there are lives not finns, but karelians, who has big HISTORICAL connect with russians. and they are orthodoxes.
mihanich 4 years ago
So who is stupid? HAH. You come here and say that you have historical connections to Karelia. You are a funny guy. That area has always been finnish or finnish related. Ok read history about those areas, if you have lived there about 60 years you think those areas belong to you. Just guess how long we have lived there?!?
tupakki 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have read history, and i sugget to you read it too. karelia was a part of novgorod republic since 12 century and karelians and russian lived together. i cant say the same about karelo-finnish relations.
mihanich 3 years ago
It would be about time Russia would accept multicultural society. Karelia language has no real status in Russia!
Einottaja 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
karelian has official status in Karelia, stupid.
mihanich 3 years ago
ei vittu :DD
Tumpppu 4 years ago 5
To return territory, it was necessary to own this territory. And Kareliya never belonged to Finland.
mihanich 4 years ago
"And Kareliya never belonged to Finland."
Where have you been during history lessons?
EuranDaltonit 4 years ago 6
karelia never belonged to finland, because it belonged to russia from times of Novgorod Feudal Republic to present days. But finland occupied karelia in short period of WWII.
maybe hot finnish guys still want to occupy sortavala or vyborg???)
mihanich 4 years ago
It's sad how little history you know. Karelia was part of Finland from 1918 to 1945, originally recognized as a traditionally Finnish land by the Bolsheviks. For crying out loud, the damn Kalevala was based on Karelian songs. It was the USSR that invaded and took it from Finland in an unprovoked war of aggression--which was solidified by Stalin's friendship with the Nazi regime in 1939. Use your head.
zombiesoiree 4 years ago 5
about what karelia you talking? about little region of vyborg? i thought you talking about all karelia)))...sorry, but i think you are not fool for want it back...
mihanich 4 years ago
The proper name of the city is Viipuri. There are also lands in the Northeast. The Karelia that Finland legally owned prior to 1945 included much of the NW banks of Lake Ladoga. RE: larger Karelia: Separating Finns from Karelians is largely a fantasy of postwar Soviet propaganda. They are like brothers ethnically and linguistically. The vast majority of Russians moved there after 1945 to justify the WWII invasion. Karelians have overwhelming asked to be part of Finland, and Stalin knew it.
zombiesoiree 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
in 1926 russians were 57% of population, so, dont fuck my brains. also karelia was a part of russian principalities(like novgorod) by centuries. and original name of the city is vyborg, not viipuri. and karelians always were in enmity with emi's because karels are were orthodoxes.
mihanich 4 years ago
Right, and how many of them lived in Petrozavodsk? Do you even know what gerrymandering is? Finland has no claim over those cities founded by Peter the Great. He built them to push Finnic peoples out of Karelia and away from St Petersburg, but Russian penetration of the Karelian interior is a postwar artifact. Hell, the majority of Viipuri is Russian now, but it was a purely Finnish town in 1944.
zombiesoiree 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i has bothered to borgue with you. all the same you will not take back karjala... fuck off
mihanich 4 years ago
I think it was "multi-cultural", there was living there Finns, Russians, Karels, Swedes and gypsies...
but NOW it is almost only russians living there...
my grandmother lived there and she was a swede,, she fleed when the russians bombed it...
swedeMafia 2 years ago 2
Vyborg was Finlands second biggest city you fool!!
4B384 3 years ago
exactly amigo, it WAS.)
mihanich 3 years ago
Yea now all city is full of russkies shit who want that city? u cant even keep it clean hahahaha
antisankari15 2 years ago
If you move millions of Ukrainians into Karelia, of course there's going to be a majority of "Russian-speakers" there. If religion determines who gets what land, then why weren't the Baltic states part of Finland (as part of the states of Catholic crusaders)? Your arguments have no merit, and are a byproduct of Soviet propaganda.
zombiesoiree 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ukrainians? in ukrainians are 2.7% of population of karelia. russians lived in karelia from early medieval (in finland we lived too). finland was a part of sweden.
mihanich 4 years ago
Many of the "Russians" who moved to places like Petrozavodsk under Peter I were from the area that is now Ukraine. Now they are considered "Russians." Karelians lived and traded in Novgorod since before the arrival of the Slavs, but Finns aren't so stupid as to claim it is "Finnish land," unlike Russian claims over Karelia ... Go to Viipuri/Karelia and see that all of the old buildings are Finno-Karelian.
zombiesoiree 4 years ago 9
@mihanich
Karelian Isthmus and part of Ladoga Karelia BELONGED to Finland before 1939. Check your history, man... Sortavala and Vyborg were Finnish towns, in fact Vyborg was Finland's second largest town back then...
Mikey84 1 year ago
Seppo Lehtohan on ihan asia tyyppi.On vakaumuksensa takana tomerasti.
pasiviheraho 4 years ago 2
Seppo Lehto Tampere samalla asialla;) lisää asiaa kun laitatte hakuun kavkaz(.)fi sivut
vappu2007 4 years ago
asiaa! miehitetyt alueet palautettava heti. . .
;)
Kristian1944 4 years ago 6