it was wrong to kill osama and dump him in the ocean, yea it sucks he killed 3000 people but the nazis killed millions and they were put on trial because thats the way things are meant to be. saddam killed hundreds of thousands if not millions and he was put on trial too, watch Coincidences 1-19 on youtube, clearly our government wanted to keep him quiet so why not just run in shoot him and dump him. you cant argue that not putting him on trial to accuse him of his crimes was the right thing2 do
They should have captured bin laden and put him on trial we gave the Nazis trials, why not bin laden? But do it in a state like Texas with the death penalty
@peleproductions no we didnt Bush started both wars without going through Congress and without an official declaration of war which would state our objective and the plan to complete it and be out asap, but no Bush didnt declare war on anyone that was just for the media to get dumbasses to go along with it and let him and his special interests to get done what it needed to do......which it did. he made millions off this war and so did cheyney and their corporate buttbuddies, do some research....
i dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories of any kind , but i do tend to think that bin-laden may have been and NPC of the political RPG . but really all i can say is... who knows? there is always more to every major story than any average citizen will ever know and i believe that might be part of our problems . people do not get involved enough in the politics of their countries to be able to keep things under control, especially here in the USA. get involved people demand your answers.
Is fox news blind? "WE got bin laden. Nothing big. He only managed to bring down the WORLD trade center, kill over 5000 thousand people, and almost destroy the pentagon and the white house. Nothing big".... Wow. My cousin who is only 13. THIRTEEN even sees there is something messed up about fox.
@Namehereplz98 We can no longer assume that Fox news is only blind or stupid. It has passed the point were stupidity will work as an explanation. Look at the amount of reporting on the "Tea Party" rallies. Now go try to find a report about what is happening on Wall Street right now. Look for a single report that shows that as taxes got cut and cut again the economy got worse and worse and then compares it to what happened under Clinton. There is too much of a pattern here.
Nobody gives half a fuck about what you think. He started the largest online news show in the world, I think it's safe to say you're a minority in disliking him.
I wonder why people are so surprised. The gov' has already done many things to show that it's one of the most corrupted in the world. And now every time they do something stupid/illegal people are somehow still surprised...
This guy, Cenk Uygur, sounds like a babbling idiot. When you condone murder, you are no better than Osama bin Laden and the warmonger and murderer OBAMA!
@Americanrevolution02 dude, its fucking Osama Bin Laden, no one -not even the most peaceloving person in the world-would give a fuck about the killing of Bin Laden. Someone with the name 'American Revolution' shouldat least think ''Thank God, someone shot that murdering asshole in the face''..
@cwongchung Wrong. We are a Republic, have a constitution and live by the Rule of Law. The president does not have the right to assassinate anybody. The president wouldn't defend you if you were convicted of murder.
@Americanrevolution02 Again, its bin laden! For the things he done, he deserved it! He killed +3000 US citizens, As far as Im concerned, as a Dutchman, every American esspecially the president had the right to assasinate him! If youre against his assasination, youre siding with Bin Laden (according to your logic in the previous comment) Its like saying you value his life over those +3000 US citizens that died.. thats not right man.
@Americanrevolution02 but I do respect your point, youre a law abiding citizen, nothing against that.
But I think, when it comes to someone as evil as Osama bin Laden, someone whos hates all over the world, other countries wouldnt blame you for breaking the rules for once..
@cwongchung Thank you. I'm sure if he was tried in a court of law, he would have been convicted and received the death sentence. The problem is allowing the president to assassinate people. If we give one person so much power, he could decide we are enemies of the state and come after anybody that disagrees with him. It's not a future I want to see.
Thanks to liberal policies America can no longer afford to pay for medicare, social security, unemployment and many other services. We also need to lower the minimum wage to $2/hr in order to compete with China and bring jobs back home. Fiscally responsible conservatives like Paul Ryan and John Boehner know this and are currently
working to end these wasteful handout programs and bring the minimum wage down so that America can be great again. God bless the GOP!
bin laden sign his death contract when he mess with america period. was 9/11 legal? was all the killing organize by bin laden legal? if you fcuk with america, we going to find you and send you to your makers mother fcukers
The discussion would have happen regardless which president was in office with Napolitano. Right now we are targeting a US citizen and no one seems concerned.
@satarnag Lots of people are concerned about the targeting of citizens and the jailing of citizens and the kangaroo court in guantanamo. I would estimate that really more than half the people are concerned but can't see a way to fix it so they go on with their lives hoping people will come to their senses. Unfortunately the days of "give me liberty or give me death" have been replaced with "take my rights. Just don't allow a trivial risk to come get me while I hide under the bed". Fear rules
@AUSM92 i dont know the goverments secrets and i dont know if they are hiding things but i do know that they didnt execute him on the spot to avoid getting him in court they could have easily captured and interrogated him to gain an incredible amount of intel. how i know they didn't "execute" him is recently several people who where allowed to see the picture described an entry wound at the ear and en exit wound above the eye, they also said he had rain matter hanging from his eye socket.
about hugo chavez in the news side to side to gadafi and kim jong il , we may remember hugo chavez was democratically elected, and re-elected, he openly does not like the U.S. that does not put him side to side to those dictators,
If you strip away all the BS (and Mr. Beck) the fox "story" actually raises a valid point, bin laden sghould have been captured, and the pakistanis informed beforehand.
As to the "they would have told him" BS the US could have tracked bin Laden wherever he tried to run via satelite, so that's just a non-argument
What happened was not justice, only revenge and a stateement that the USA does what ever the hell they please.
@IVscythia Satellites are not super-beings. They can't see through walls and they are not always hovering overhead. They leave gaps in the coverage and there is a lot that they can't see. What the US did was likely the best thing for Pakistan because it did not leave the chance of proof that Pakistan was playing on both teams.
Their ISI is massively corrupt and they see Afghanistan as a possible client state for India. I know it doesn't make sense but they think that.
@knowledgemonger I know all that, satelites arn't perfect, and the ISI are so corrupt its almost unbelivable. Im just saying, that if the US forces really wanted to take bin Laden alive they could have, no queastion, and if they wanted to track him, they most likely could have pulled that of as well.
@IVscythia I the US was willing to get many people killed on the effort, they could have perhaps taken OBL alive. As it was, he didn't have his hands up when they entered the room and people did not stay still. When dealing with people who arrange suicide bombings, it is a risk to allow any motion at all.
@IVscythia Special Forces(US or otherwise) aren't trained to capture their targets. It might seam bleak but that is the job they do. There wouldn't have been the luxury of time in a raid like that, it would need to be over as quickly as possible.You overestimate satellites, and these types of missions need to be kept covert and carried out swiftly before the window of opportunity closes(forgive the clichés). Its the unsettling reality of offensive action.
The only people who are making a race issue out of this are the liberal and obama supporters, they wont accpet that Obama messed up and got too far ahead of himself on this one.
Speculating what a white republican president would do is dumb but if you want an example, when Bush was president, Saadam was brough in ALIVE by US troops.
@Sixstrings81 Yes Saddam the guy with no WMDs and no connection to 9/11 was arrested in Iraq after the US had taken control of the place. Saddam was hiding in a hole in the ground. Meanwhile OBL was building his nice well defended villa and Bush didn't get him.
Two very different situations and two very different results. I'll take Obama's getting the guy who really did it over Bush's getting of the guy who didn't.
Obama didn't end terroism or end the war, he just added fuel to the fire. And Sadam, killed way more innocent people than 3k or so who died on 9/11. You can argue all you want about whose lost lifes are more valuble and relevant but I see monsters gone off this earth done in during the same war
I'm glad intelligence was able to find Osama but I am not happy that Obama's call to have him offed, then burried at sea. I wish team 6 was skilled enough to take a man alive.
@Sixstrings81 Obama wanted him arrested or killed. He was the leader on the other side decapitation is a common strategy. Killing him does not end the effort against al qaeda but it does reduce the ability of them to coordinate their side.
As for Saddam killing more then OBL, yes he did so have many people but he killed his own countrymen. The US is acting against a group who killed americans and attacked on american soil. I'm sure you can see why.
I disagreee, it doesn't reduce anything. Osama probably has people ready to step up and take charge in case he died with definite plans to attack and those guys are MAD now and don't care about dying. It's a lose, lose with these guys.
Hopefully our next President can END the war and bring the troops home. More US troops and innocent people have died during this war than in 9/11 alone.
@Sixstrings81 Liberal by definition is free thinker. Why do Conservatives attack people for being a free thinker? Because they believe the universe revolves around the Earth, the Earth is flat, and the Earth was created in 7 days.
Yeah, I've seen many people talking about the legality of this, and to them I say
If you didn't complain about this before, drink a tall glass of shut-up juice. Of all the times the US has done internationally illegal operations of this sort, this is by far the most excusable one that I would give a pass to in the blink of an eye
If a conservative wants to talk like GB & Napolitano did here, they should recognize that Obama's standing on the shoulders of Bush on the issue of presidential power
@AUSM92 these seals are the most trust worthy and well trained people on the face of the planet and hte new news is that there where several weapons in the room and osama made a move towards one of them, bin laden had been worrying about being captured for along time so he would have done whatever he possibly could to avoid being capture and put on trial. and like i said before there would be no way to know if he had a bomb on him to blow up these brave troops.
@AUSM92 ROFL you sir are a moron. I am not a leftist, I am in fact a hardcore conservative who despises fox. Not only do you seem to shout conspiracy about 9/11, which is like stating that Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by the US government; completely and utterly stupid, but you also bring out other stupid remarks. I won't deny that going into Iraq was wrong, but you sir are just a moron.
Stopped at :40, right when the name Glen Beck was uttered. Talk about taking a wack job story to the utterly insane with that man.
We have been at war with al qaeda for YEARS. They killed thousands of our citizens in an attack. Bin Ladin was the leader of this faction that we have been at war.
Those mentioned have not killed any of our citizens, and have not declared war on us, therefore it is unrealistic to even fathom is killing them. Just stupid Fox further lowering their credibility.
@Prosthetics511 There is a slight problem with "at war with". Really al qaeda is an international criminal organization. They have no standing as a state. As such calling this a war is calling the guys on the other side soldiers which is far too honorable word for them. "murders" seems like a better word for them although in many cases, they are "criminal conspirators". The US government and others have the right to act against those who committed the crimes of 911 etc.
Nothing like slanting the story to fit your needs... when the story is "someone else slanting the story." If it was a Republican, Andrew Napolitano would have done the exact same segment. Andrew Napolitano is a libertarian and has been calling these wars unjust, questioning the Constitutionality of the wars, etc. for years.
This is perhaps the first reasonable question I've ever seen discussed on Fox. Under US law should Bin Laden not have been captured and brought back to face justice? From my understanding of the event, Bin Laden was unarmed during the attack.
I think republicans are just salty that Bush couldn't get both saddam and bin laden, if bin laden would have been killed under bush's administration glenn beck would be on his knees sucking bush's dick, and then could discuss how its ok for beck to suck bush's dick but not ok for for monica lewinsky to suck bill clinton's dick
TYT can only gain credibility admitting an opponent. even a crazy opponent like FOX CAN make a point once a year. Objectively (without emotional reaction) then Judge Napolitano IS right this single time (actually and generally he has a credible stance on rule of law).
BREAKING FOX NEWS- Father of Terrorist Republic of Pakistan Osama-(garbage )bin-laden is killed in US attack and now Pakistan gonna be next Yugoslavia very soon, and Capital Islamabad ( Islam-bad) will be worst than Bagdad..After USA, Indian Drones are ready to smash garbage muslim country Pakistan (Pig-stan). Mark my words
When's this happened during that happened during Bush's time card going to end? I'm a liberal but it seems the media's using that excuse to get out of everything. Answer the damn question
Fox is so hilarious. They say we should have declared war but, we did that in Iraq and we already see where that got us. Yea sure, declare war on Osama Bin Laden. The world's greatest nation going to war to kill one guy....how pathetic would that sound? Send a team in, kill the fucker, call it a day. That's the point of us having some of the baddest special forces on the planet. You wanna avoid a war? Send in 5-30 guys, not 250,000 troops. That's how you avoid a war. Idiots!
@xcruzrr6 Also "war" means a fight between two nations. OBL was not in any way the leader of a nation. He was the leader of an international criminal organization. You can't really call that a "war".
@cupmyplums Exactly - and it is extremely hilarious considering Republicans are supposedly the ones with the pro-War, shoot-em-up-big-style-boys mentality. Now they are attacking a Democratic President for killing the #1 Most Wanted Terrorist! I'm not even American and I find these guys pathetic!
@SuGaRuSh14 These days they have two main issues, spending and military. If you look at their record, they spend a lot (please remember that Bush-2 kept the wars "off budget") and make a mess of military matters. Part of their continued support is the rebranding they did in creating the Tea Party. By changing their name and making a lot of noise about the very things that they have just been guilty of, they do well with low information voters.
Let me get this straight... The US military 'kills' Osama Bin Laden and so not to 'inflame' the extremist they bury the body at the bottom of the ocean and deny any evidence other that their word. Well, so the 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan alone not counting the soldiers in Iraq, drone attacks in Libya, Yemen, Pakistan and where ever else is not more of a reason to 'inflame' the extremist than just a few photos. There is truth to the story but it not what we are being told!!!
We shouldn't have killed Bin Laden. The only thing that accomplished, legal or not, is that it made a martyr out of him. Which means that more people are going to flock to his message, which means we're never going to be able to get the fuck out of the middle east.
If Bush had gotten Bin Laden the story would be our great leader defeated evil. They wouldn't touch a legal issue. Bush INVADES a country under a new preemption doctrine and kills over 10000 human beings and we are arguing the law on the killing of the head of a terrorist organization. If I were a dem, I'd go after Beck and Napolatano and argue that they aren't patriots.
The world would be a better place if many of these evil dictators were killed. That doesn't mean we should do it because of other considerations, but in the case of Osama the good outweighs the possible bad.
@Saikr0n the legality of the raid and subsequent death of Osama isn't my point of contention. All I'm pointing out is that while al-Qaeda's "threat" and power were/are exaggerated, to say that al-Qaeda is probably not a major terrorist organization/doesn't even exist, and to say that Osama had no part in ANY terrorist plot is stretching it a bit.
Even if "al-Qaeda" in reality is really just a loose collaboration of minor groups with Osama as a figure head and little more.
I might be an arsehole who questions whether he should have been shot (ideally no, if necessary yep) and I'm kinda disturbed by all the glee and elebration at someone's death.
But I'm not Fox News. It's complete hypocrisy for them to pull this shit, but really did anyone expect anything else?
Ah, so I guess it's Bush's fault now, since Obama supposedly simply followed Bush's policies. Right? Just wondering if you're actually going to be consistent in your bullshit, Fox News.
@DoctorDoubleX that does not make it legal, to the world and those nations could make the same laws against us. Osama was not tried and convicted. He was executed. But by now any military or other world leader should know not to take money, aid or training from the US. Both bin laden and hussein were allies before they were enemies. To condone what he did is to condone the same guys coming into your house at night and doing the same thing to you and yours.
America has been the major sponser of terrorism for decades,so the killing of an unarmed man in front of his children is no surprise.Your navy seals are no heroes, their just a pack of fucking cowardly inhuman bastards. Bin Laden has won! he has brutalised you into primitivism and barbarity, into mirror images of himself.
@mister18cm sorry boss but while I agree with you on your critique of American chauvinism you are way of the mark trying to paint anyone like Osama as anything other than what he was a party to the murder of thousands. In my opinion he should have been killed by th seals early on and the war should never have started. And of course the American politicians who started this war should face justice with the option of execution on the table.
@mister18cm However, I am a little embarrassed that you believe that there is never a cause for violence. you logic is flawed. should it be tempered by wisdom yes, but should self defense and revenge be taken off the table no. I think that if you held a mirror up to yourself you would realize that as a human being you are obligated to "brutality" for protection of yourself and others. To love your enemies is truly immoral.
I'm also confused...people keep saying Bin Laden was the mastermind behind the NY attacks...but why was he never credited to being this mastermind on the FBI site?
@MullyROI I the US, you can't sell pork calling it beef but the word "news" is not "defined" by the government to have a fixed meaning. I have heard that Fox News can't broadcast in Canada because there the word is defined. You have to be willing to stand behind the reports and are stating that to the best of your knowledge it is the truth. I think it may also be a protected term in many places in Europe too. I don't know. Perhaps someone from over there will comment.
funny FOX news and there ilk all said that Manning and assange should be killed. Shit Palin said we should take Assange out. lets think OBL some how is less than Assange? man these guys are retarded
well done killing bin larden. but you have to respect killing prabakaran as well.because larden a such a head ace for americans freedom as well as prabakaran is to sri lankans.pls dont hurt us using human rights that you dont have as you saying.
I see that Liberals are mourning over the loss of their favorite icon, Osama Bin Laden. Their Islamic terrorist President killed him no less in order to make it look like Barack Osama actually isn't a traitor to our nation. Liberals and President Osama are both traitors and that's an undeniable fact. I'm not sure why liberal fucktards love to embrace Islam, possibly because of their warm and fuzzy multee-culturaleesm.
@dogkoota a twat? So you're a Communist English fucktard? The UK is just lucky that the United States doesn't roll out of bed one day and decide to take it over.
@IAmHotize ohh I love this game! :) doouche nozzzle, republicunt, conservaprick, tea bag Meister, Islamaphomoron, nipple dick, Fox licker, Beckhole= you! :)
@xcruzrr6 I realize you libtards are grieving over the loss of your hero, and you reject the truth of Christ while embracing the false religion of Islam, but that's no reason to be rude. That's another thing liberals have trouble with, controlling their anger.
@IAmHotize Oh please. After all that BS you spouted in your first comment? Rude? Anger? Obviously you're familiar with them. I don't see anyone grieving over here buddy. I can't fathom why you think that. You guys are the ones questioning whether or not we should have killed the scumbag.
Look around fucknuts, does it look like anyone is mourning to you? We're all fucking celebrating. Jon Stewart is celebrating, Cenk Uygur is celebrating, And YOUR PRESIDENT, Barack Obama, is celebrating. It's plainly obvious that you did not even watch the video you are commenting on, because it demonstrates clearly that it is CONSERVATIVES, most notably Glen Beck, who are whining and crying, saying it's bad that we killed a terrorist.
Obama would send his squad after Satan too... if such a person existed!
What would Fox News do with that? Glenn Beck would say "It was an act of evil to kill Satan, because only with the presence of Satan in the World will we have the motivation to stick together and fight evil. With Satan gone, Obama has set himself up to be the new Prince of Darkness. I saw this coming from the beginning."
@nintendowiirocks111 My point is stop being hypocrites and call them Assassins! But they wont because Assassins sounds bad. Like bribery, they call it lobbying. George Orwell is turning in is grave right now. They change the names of bad things because people get dumb. Bin Laden was supported by the CIA in the past. Sadam was also supported by the U.S. They probably knew too much.
@47f0 Probably because we have something called due process in the US. Let the government make its case in a trial like Saddam got, and then execute him lawfully. This was frontier justice, and bin Laden was lynched.
Cognitive dissonance doesn't begin to describe this shit. Anyway I think comparing OBL to a head-of-state or one of our citizens is asinine. Plus like the obvious, had a GOP president issued the order not a single GOoPer would have been whining about this. That's why I have no tolerance for their shit if it comes from anyone who supported Iraq, WoT, etc. Legality yes is very debatable, but if I'm gonna discuss it it'll be with Glenn Greenwald who has credibility there, not fucking Glenn Beck.
hell if obama do or don't fox news is going 2 put him down i don't believe somebody can do 100% foolishness not even bush can do that democrat or republican stop being hypocrites call people on there bullshit
@goremau Nah, they just want to spin. Like tops. They only want to show the Democrats in the worst light possible, and they would use any scenario at hand. They don't care about bin Laden.
I seemed to recall OBL declaring ware on the USA, wouldn't we have been at war with from that point on? Didn't Obama's order & the SEAL team bring to a completions something originated by GWB?
How the fuck are private manning and julian assange (whistleblowers) on the same list with dictators and KSM?? Fox would absolutely LOVE to see the whistleblowers assassination carried out. Legality? Like they give a damn.
If a Republican had killed Bin Laden and they had this kind of discussion on MSNBC with Democrats and Liberals... FOX News would've pointed it out for days to "prove" that MSNBC, Dems and Liberals all hate America and love terrorists. That's always been their M.O.
it was wrong to kill osama and dump him in the ocean, yea it sucks he killed 3000 people but the nazis killed millions and they were put on trial because thats the way things are meant to be. saddam killed hundreds of thousands if not millions and he was put on trial too, watch Coincidences 1-19 on youtube, clearly our government wanted to keep him quiet so why not just run in shoot him and dump him. you cant argue that not putting him on trial to accuse him of his crimes was the right thing2 do
marinefootball45 2 weeks ago
If Bush would have killed bin laden, they would have call him st.bush
darkastonvillafan 4 weeks ago
brilliant video
smuggecko 1 month ago
This is a great video
osclarkos 1 month ago
BIN LADEN IS RIGHT BEHIND U!!
aanonymous960 1 month ago
the republicans are just angry that it was´nt GW who killes him.
duff2000 1 month ago
They should have captured bin laden and put him on trial we gave the Nazis trials, why not bin laden? But do it in a state like Texas with the death penalty
MultiCheeseGrater 1 month ago
Well, Quaddafi and Jong-Il are now both dead, looks like Obama accepted the challenge ^^,
Jostedalsosten 1 month ago
this guy is a douche.
CronjaAficionado 1 month ago
Heavy is the head that wears the crown, when the ones you serve try to pull you down.
BlackAzzRobb 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
DUDE YOU SUCK BEING A HOST...Cant watch to your show anymore..I am out...
securenepal 2 months ago
Rip Osama Bin Laden Champion of hide and seek 2001-2011
HALOMASTER801 2 months ago
Well, good thing Kim Jong Il is dead, huh?
TheBigred062 2 months ago
Wait... Didn't we actually declare a war against Osama Bin Laden? Isn't that the whole War on Terror? I'm confused, am I wrong about that?
peleproductions 3 months ago 4
@peleproductions no we didnt Bush started both wars without going through Congress and without an official declaration of war which would state our objective and the plan to complete it and be out asap, but no Bush didnt declare war on anyone that was just for the media to get dumbasses to go along with it and let him and his special interests to get done what it needed to do......which it did. he made millions off this war and so did cheyney and their corporate buttbuddies, do some research....
marinefootball45 2 weeks ago
i dont subscribe to any conspiracy theories of any kind , but i do tend to think that bin-laden may have been and NPC of the political RPG . but really all i can say is... who knows? there is always more to every major story than any average citizen will ever know and i believe that might be part of our problems . people do not get involved enough in the politics of their countries to be able to keep things under control, especially here in the USA. get involved people demand your answers.
LadySpy120 4 months ago
Is fox news blind? "WE got bin laden. Nothing big. He only managed to bring down the WORLD trade center, kill over 5000 thousand people, and almost destroy the pentagon and the white house. Nothing big".... Wow. My cousin who is only 13. THIRTEEN even sees there is something messed up about fox.
Namehereplz98 5 months ago
@Namehereplz98 We can no longer assume that Fox news is only blind or stupid. It has passed the point were stupidity will work as an explanation. Look at the amount of reporting on the "Tea Party" rallies. Now go try to find a report about what is happening on Wall Street right now. Look for a single report that shows that as taxes got cut and cut again the economy got worse and worse and then compares it to what happened under Clinton. There is too much of a pattern here.
knowledgemonger 5 months ago
wow republicans are so full of shit
Ado0981 5 months ago
This guy fn sucks. He is fat and not funny at all. He reminds he of a (more) male rachel maddow.
FULLBLOWN495 6 months ago
@FULLBLOWN495 OH MY GOD YOU'RE SO FUCKING FUNNY
Nobody gives half a fuck about what you think. He started the largest online news show in the world, I think it's safe to say you're a minority in disliking him.
lukepleaseshutup 5 months ago
4 words describes what osama bin laden was: CLEAR. AND. PRESENT. DANGER.
dentonatordude 6 months ago
I wonder why people are so surprised. The gov' has already done many things to show that it's one of the most corrupted in the world. And now every time they do something stupid/illegal people are somehow still surprised...
iTheGeek 6 months ago
Republitards never fail to amaze me!
TexasNightmare210 7 months ago
OMG freaking conservatives love killing people but if a democrat did it then ....lol
ricardocontreras94 7 months ago
CHAVEZ?!?!?! How did Chavez get on that list? Lmao are they desperate for dictators?
oodlesofosz 8 months ago
This guy, Cenk Uygur, sounds like a babbling idiot. When you condone murder, you are no better than Osama bin Laden and the warmonger and murderer OBAMA!
Americanrevolution02 8 months ago
@Americanrevolution02 dude, its fucking Osama Bin Laden, no one -not even the most peaceloving person in the world-would give a fuck about the killing of Bin Laden. Someone with the name 'American Revolution' shouldat least think ''Thank God, someone shot that murdering asshole in the face''..
cwongchung 8 months ago
@cwongchung Wrong. We are a Republic, have a constitution and live by the Rule of Law. The president does not have the right to assassinate anybody. The president wouldn't defend you if you were convicted of murder.
Americanrevolution02 8 months ago
@Americanrevolution02 Again, its bin laden! For the things he done, he deserved it! He killed +3000 US citizens, As far as Im concerned, as a Dutchman, every American esspecially the president had the right to assasinate him! If youre against his assasination, youre siding with Bin Laden (according to your logic in the previous comment) Its like saying you value his life over those +3000 US citizens that died.. thats not right man.
but thats just my oppinion.
cwongchung 8 months ago
@Americanrevolution02 but I do respect your point, youre a law abiding citizen, nothing against that.
But I think, when it comes to someone as evil as Osama bin Laden, someone whos hates all over the world, other countries wouldnt blame you for breaking the rules for once..
cwongchung 8 months ago
@cwongchung Thank you. I'm sure if he was tried in a court of law, he would have been convicted and received the death sentence. The problem is allowing the president to assassinate people. If we give one person so much power, he could decide we are enemies of the state and come after anybody that disagrees with him. It's not a future I want to see.
Americanrevolution02 8 months ago
Comment removed
Americanrevolution02 8 months ago
but who will kill osama bin dissell?
darthshadowxxx 8 months ago
Fox news is about as balanced as a one legged drunk man.
archegonia23 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to liberal policies America can no longer afford to pay for medicare, social security, unemployment and many other services. We also need to lower the minimum wage to $2/hr in order to compete with China and bring jobs back home. Fiscally responsible conservatives like Paul Ryan and John Boehner know this and are currently
working to end these wasteful handout programs and bring the minimum wage down so that America can be great again. God bless the GOP!
GOPkicksbutt 9 months ago
fox had the same fake outrage hard on when Clinton went to North Korea to get the two girls.
walkermydawg 9 months ago
bin laden sign his death contract when he mess with america period. was 9/11 legal? was all the killing organize by bin laden legal? if you fcuk with america, we going to find you and send you to your makers mother fcukers
orleanshotboy 9 months ago
"We should've declared war"
QTF do they call what Bush did. He started the war on al qaeda.
Meanwhile Osama was what...unaware that we were hunting him, Haha.
So glad Glenn Beck will soon lose the ability to speak in public mass media.
Bound4Earth 9 months ago
i cant believe this, they are the same sons of bitches who declared the goddamn war and who set up ossama as enemy number one.
mattm465 9 months ago
Hugo Chavez?
We all agree he is a dick, but he isn't a murderer and I don't think he has even threatened the life of a single American.
Treblaine 9 months ago
The discussion would have happen regardless which president was in office with Napolitano. Right now we are targeting a US citizen and no one seems concerned.
satarnag 9 months ago
@satarnag Lots of people are concerned about the targeting of citizens and the jailing of citizens and the kangaroo court in guantanamo. I would estimate that really more than half the people are concerned but can't see a way to fix it so they go on with their lives hoping people will come to their senses. Unfortunately the days of "give me liberty or give me death" have been replaced with "take my rights. Just don't allow a trivial risk to come get me while I hide under the bed". Fear rules
knowledgemonger 9 months ago 2
@AUSM92 i ran out of room, anyway this means he was shot from the side while lunging for a weapon
chubbs636 9 months ago
@AUSM92 i dont know the goverments secrets and i dont know if they are hiding things but i do know that they didnt execute him on the spot to avoid getting him in court they could have easily captured and interrogated him to gain an incredible amount of intel. how i know they didn't "execute" him is recently several people who where allowed to see the picture described an entry wound at the ear and en exit wound above the eye, they also said he had rain matter hanging from his eye socket.
chubbs636 9 months ago
about hugo chavez in the news side to side to gadafi and kim jong il , we may remember hugo chavez was democratically elected, and re-elected, he openly does not like the U.S. that does not put him side to side to those dictators,
mastigoz 9 months ago
If you strip away all the BS (and Mr. Beck) the fox "story" actually raises a valid point, bin laden sghould have been captured, and the pakistanis informed beforehand.
As to the "they would have told him" BS the US could have tracked bin Laden wherever he tried to run via satelite, so that's just a non-argument
What happened was not justice, only revenge and a stateement that the USA does what ever the hell they please.
IVscythia 9 months ago
@IVscythia Satellites are not super-beings. They can't see through walls and they are not always hovering overhead. They leave gaps in the coverage and there is a lot that they can't see. What the US did was likely the best thing for Pakistan because it did not leave the chance of proof that Pakistan was playing on both teams.
Their ISI is massively corrupt and they see Afghanistan as a possible client state for India. I know it doesn't make sense but they think that.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@knowledgemonger I know all that, satelites arn't perfect, and the ISI are so corrupt its almost unbelivable. Im just saying, that if the US forces really wanted to take bin Laden alive they could have, no queastion, and if they wanted to track him, they most likely could have pulled that of as well.
IVscythia 9 months ago
@IVscythia I the US was willing to get many people killed on the effort, they could have perhaps taken OBL alive. As it was, he didn't have his hands up when they entered the room and people did not stay still. When dealing with people who arrange suicide bombings, it is a risk to allow any motion at all.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@IVscythia Special Forces(US or otherwise) aren't trained to capture their targets. It might seam bleak but that is the job they do. There wouldn't have been the luxury of time in a raid like that, it would need to be over as quickly as possible.You overestimate satellites, and these types of missions need to be kept covert and carried out swiftly before the window of opportunity closes(forgive the clichés). Its the unsettling reality of offensive action.
EbsNhexz 9 months ago
and of course its in texas
cannabisbisbisbisbis 9 months ago
The only people who are making a race issue out of this are the liberal and obama supporters, they wont accpet that Obama messed up and got too far ahead of himself on this one.
Speculating what a white republican president would do is dumb but if you want an example, when Bush was president, Saadam was brough in ALIVE by US troops.
Sixstrings81 9 months ago
@Sixstrings81 Yes Saddam the guy with no WMDs and no connection to 9/11 was arrested in Iraq after the US had taken control of the place. Saddam was hiding in a hole in the ground. Meanwhile OBL was building his nice well defended villa and Bush didn't get him.
Two very different situations and two very different results. I'll take Obama's getting the guy who really did it over Bush's getting of the guy who didn't.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@knowledgemonger
Obama didn't end terroism or end the war, he just added fuel to the fire. And Sadam, killed way more innocent people than 3k or so who died on 9/11. You can argue all you want about whose lost lifes are more valuble and relevant but I see monsters gone off this earth done in during the same war
I'm glad intelligence was able to find Osama but I am not happy that Obama's call to have him offed, then burried at sea. I wish team 6 was skilled enough to take a man alive.
Sixstrings81 9 months ago
@Sixstrings81 Obama wanted him arrested or killed. He was the leader on the other side decapitation is a common strategy. Killing him does not end the effort against al qaeda but it does reduce the ability of them to coordinate their side.
As for Saddam killing more then OBL, yes he did so have many people but he killed his own countrymen. The US is acting against a group who killed americans and attacked on american soil. I'm sure you can see why.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@knowledgemonger
I disagreee, it doesn't reduce anything. Osama probably has people ready to step up and take charge in case he died with definite plans to attack and those guys are MAD now and don't care about dying. It's a lose, lose with these guys.
Hopefully our next President can END the war and bring the troops home. More US troops and innocent people have died during this war than in 9/11 alone.
Anways, happy friday.
Sixstrings81 9 months ago
@Sixstrings81 Liberal by definition is free thinker. Why do Conservatives attack people for being a free thinker? Because they believe the universe revolves around the Earth, the Earth is flat, and the Earth was created in 7 days.
FapioLopez 9 months ago
@FapioLopez
Really? So are conservatives because they're definitely free to believe whatever they want, like you are.
And who is a conservative here? Not me. Conservatives and Liberal are two of the most annoying groups on earth in my opinion.
Sixstrings81 9 months ago
Yeah, I've seen many people talking about the legality of this, and to them I say
If you didn't complain about this before, drink a tall glass of shut-up juice. Of all the times the US has done internationally illegal operations of this sort, this is by far the most excusable one that I would give a pass to in the blink of an eye
If a conservative wants to talk like GB & Napolitano did here, they should recognize that Obama's standing on the shoulders of Bush on the issue of presidential power
MyTemporaryAccount88 9 months ago
@AUSM92 these seals are the most trust worthy and well trained people on the face of the planet and hte new news is that there where several weapons in the room and osama made a move towards one of them, bin laden had been worrying about being captured for along time so he would have done whatever he possibly could to avoid being capture and put on trial. and like i said before there would be no way to know if he had a bomb on him to blow up these brave troops.
chubbs636 9 months ago
@AUSM92 ROFL you sir are a moron. I am not a leftist, I am in fact a hardcore conservative who despises fox. Not only do you seem to shout conspiracy about 9/11, which is like stating that Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by the US government; completely and utterly stupid, but you also bring out other stupid remarks. I won't deny that going into Iraq was wrong, but you sir are just a moron.
Prosthetics511 9 months ago
He was executed without a trial though. They could of captured him and given him a trial instead they decided to go the barbarian way.
willforrhall 9 months ago
@willforrhall they killed him on the spot because the risk of him having a bomb on him and blowing up the all the seals was to great
chubbs636 9 months ago
Stopped at :40, right when the name Glen Beck was uttered. Talk about taking a wack job story to the utterly insane with that man.
We have been at war with al qaeda for YEARS. They killed thousands of our citizens in an attack. Bin Ladin was the leader of this faction that we have been at war.
Those mentioned have not killed any of our citizens, and have not declared war on us, therefore it is unrealistic to even fathom is killing them. Just stupid Fox further lowering their credibility.
Prosthetics511 9 months ago
@Prosthetics511 There is a slight problem with "at war with". Really al qaeda is an international criminal organization. They have no standing as a state. As such calling this a war is calling the guys on the other side soldiers which is far too honorable word for them. "murders" seems like a better word for them although in many cases, they are "criminal conspirators". The US government and others have the right to act against those who committed the crimes of 911 etc.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
For once I agree with Glenn Beck.
CipherMind117 9 months ago
@CipherMind117 lybia has nothing to with osama... he attacked us gadafi didnt
chubbs636 9 months ago
@CipherMind117 I mean I agree with him when he says we should have had a war declared.
CipherMind117 9 months ago
Nothing like slanting the story to fit your needs... when the story is "someone else slanting the story." If it was a Republican, Andrew Napolitano would have done the exact same segment. Andrew Napolitano is a libertarian and has been calling these wars unjust, questioning the Constitutionality of the wars, etc. for years.
dyeager78 9 months ago
This is perhaps the first reasonable question I've ever seen discussed on Fox. Under US law should Bin Laden not have been captured and brought back to face justice? From my understanding of the event, Bin Laden was unarmed during the attack.
StevenBee2 9 months ago
republicans are dumbasses. thumbs up if you agree!
CrayzmanPwns 9 months ago
This is fucking hilarious hearing them talking about this
shadowblade145 9 months ago
Oh no! They questioned killing Bin Laden! TERRORISTS!!!!!!! COMMUNISTS!!!!!WHERES THEIR US FLAG PIN!??!?!?! HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ilovebaconsandwiches 9 months ago
I think republicans are just salty that Bush couldn't get both saddam and bin laden, if bin laden would have been killed under bush's administration glenn beck would be on his knees sucking bush's dick, and then could discuss how its ok for beck to suck bush's dick but not ok for for monica lewinsky to suck bill clinton's dick
musicluuva 9 months ago
TYT can only gain credibility admitting an opponent. even a crazy opponent like FOX CAN make a point once a year. Objectively (without emotional reaction) then Judge Napolitano IS right this single time (actually and generally he has a credible stance on rule of law).
zhrmod 9 months ago
TYT has changed since they got close connections with main stream media.. TYT is bought out.. Over and out!!
Bye ;)
zhrmod 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BREAKING FOX NEWS- Father of Terrorist Republic of Pakistan Osama-(garbage )bin-laden is killed in US attack and now Pakistan gonna be next Yugoslavia very soon, and Capital Islamabad ( Islam-bad) will be worst than Bagdad..After USA, Indian Drones are ready to smash garbage muslim country Pakistan (Pig-stan). Mark my words
MrSmile1087 9 months ago
OBAMA KILLED OSAMA!!! GIVE HIM 4 MORE YEARS!!!
TheStrangebutReal 9 months ago
When's this happened during that happened during Bush's time card going to end? I'm a liberal but it seems the media's using that excuse to get out of everything. Answer the damn question
dank4509 9 months ago
@dank4509 You will need to state clearly what question you would like an answer to. Youtube comments need to stand on their own.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@dank4509 Stay off the dank....just sayin.
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
I don't even fuck with politics. I just do my thing.
KrfNYC2 9 months ago
I love watching Left wing media. It gives me a smile, that same smile when you're arguing with a stupid person.
3400979 9 months ago
Fox is so hilarious. They say we should have declared war but, we did that in Iraq and we already see where that got us. Yea sure, declare war on Osama Bin Laden. The world's greatest nation going to war to kill one guy....how pathetic would that sound? Send a team in, kill the fucker, call it a day. That's the point of us having some of the baddest special forces on the planet. You wanna avoid a war? Send in 5-30 guys, not 250,000 troops. That's how you avoid a war. Idiots!
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
@xcruzrr6 Also "war" means a fight between two nations. OBL was not in any way the leader of a nation. He was the leader of an international criminal organization. You can't really call that a "war".
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
@knowledgemonger Exactly!
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
Watching Republicans squirm trying to find the angle to attack Obama on this is hilarious.
Obama walks on water......yeah but that's only because he can't swim.
cupmyplums 9 months ago 35
@cupmyplums Exactly - and it is extremely hilarious considering Republicans are supposedly the ones with the pro-War, shoot-em-up-big-style-boys mentality. Now they are attacking a Democratic President for killing the #1 Most Wanted Terrorist! I'm not even American and I find these guys pathetic!
SuGaRuSh14 9 months ago
@SuGaRuSh14 These days they have two main issues, spending and military. If you look at their record, they spend a lot (please remember that Bush-2 kept the wars "off budget") and make a mess of military matters. Part of their continued support is the rebranding they did in creating the Tea Party. By changing their name and making a lot of noise about the very things that they have just been guilty of, they do well with low information voters.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
Come on Cenk,I understand your point but ...You alone have been "under the confetti rain" for 120 hours and counting...Let's move on ....
edgar2dnd 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Osama should hide himself in China. Cause that's the only place the western countries won't be take actions that easy.
Chineization 9 months ago
you ever notice the tone of this guy.. he sounds like he's tryin really hard to get people persuaded.
ETrainist1 9 months ago
Let me get this straight... The US military 'kills' Osama Bin Laden and so not to 'inflame' the extremist they bury the body at the bottom of the ocean and deny any evidence other that their word. Well, so the 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan alone not counting the soldiers in Iraq, drone attacks in Libya, Yemen, Pakistan and where ever else is not more of a reason to 'inflame' the extremist than just a few photos. There is truth to the story but it not what we are being told!!!
BeingLiberal101 9 months ago
We shouldn't have killed Bin Laden. The only thing that accomplished, legal or not, is that it made a martyr out of him. Which means that more people are going to flock to his message, which means we're never going to be able to get the fuck out of the middle east.
TheManiacalSatanist6 9 months ago
If Bush had gotten Bin Laden the story would be our great leader defeated evil. They wouldn't touch a legal issue. Bush INVADES a country under a new preemption doctrine and kills over 10000 human beings and we are arguing the law on the killing of the head of a terrorist organization. If I were a dem, I'd go after Beck and Napolatano and argue that they aren't patriots.
dsgregg 9 months ago
@jason666king "I'm really getting tired of the fact that I share the U.S. with these fucking morons."
Right there with you, bro.
DarkF00L 9 months ago
@DarkF00L Amen
maphitha1 9 months ago
Actually Cenk is wrong.
The actions against Iraq were legal and approved by the UNSC.
crutmauler 9 months ago
@crutmauler The UNSC approving anything does NOT void our constitutional process of having the Congress declare war.
TheManiacalSatanist6 9 months ago
The world would be a better place if many of these evil dictators were killed. That doesn't mean we should do it because of other considerations, but in the case of Osama the good outweighs the possible bad.
coolbanana165 9 months ago
WHAT?
Maybe we shouldn't have killed Osama after all huh Beck?
majesticdragoon 9 months ago
Fox is a trip. All of a sudden we shouldn't have killed Bin Laden. And they wonder why they're losing viewers.
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
Okay this doesn't make me laugh, this makes me mad. How can that say something that bullshit with a straight face?
91TheKW91 9 months ago
This guy is hilarious!!
"International Law??? The UN??? Ahhhh poo!!"
After Osama is killed.....
"Now wait....this is not quite comport with UN resolution 12.3.2.1, subsection A, subsection 12." LMAO!!
terrelya83 9 months ago
Lol, Fox reality television.
mirick79 9 months ago
These Fox News people are politically schizophrenic and I think that tthis president, simply by his existence in the White House, is exposing this.
amolapaz1 9 months ago
@Saikr0n the legality of the raid and subsequent death of Osama isn't my point of contention. All I'm pointing out is that while al-Qaeda's "threat" and power were/are exaggerated, to say that al-Qaeda is probably not a major terrorist organization/doesn't even exist, and to say that Osama had no part in ANY terrorist plot is stretching it a bit.
Even if "al-Qaeda" in reality is really just a loose collaboration of minor groups with Osama as a figure head and little more.
Greyghostvol1 9 months ago
the president cant kill whoever he wants
but bin laden had a bounty of his head
therefore its legal to kill him
FarhanC99 9 months ago
sure, of course. more useless backward bickering from Judge "Snack Sack" Napolitano and Glenn "Mancakes" Beck. suuuuuuuuuuuuuurpriiise. fuckers.
ASHERAINER 9 months ago
A case of sour grapes much?
I might be an arsehole who questions whether he should have been shot (ideally no, if necessary yep) and I'm kinda disturbed by all the glee and elebration at someone's death.
But I'm not Fox News. It's complete hypocrisy for them to pull this shit, but really did anyone expect anything else?
Teloculos 9 months ago
@3star2nr Sorry. I thought you were talking about the number of people, irrespective of nationality.
grieske 9 months ago
Ah, so I guess it's Bush's fault now, since Obama supposedly simply followed Bush's policies. Right? Just wondering if you're actually going to be consistent in your bullshit, Fox News.
gagaplex 9 months ago
TYT ARMY - Alan Grayson has his own Youtube Channel! - RepAlanGrayson
it's brilliant!
ooMONKEYoo 9 months ago
hahahahaha @ "my mentor glenn beck"
you have to be seriously fucked up to consider him your mentor
haroonfunny94 9 months ago
Section 2(a) of the joint resolution, authorizes the President “to use all necessary and
appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned,
authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,
or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of
international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or
persons.”
DoctorDoubleX 9 months ago
@DoctorDoubleX that does not make it legal, to the world and those nations could make the same laws against us. Osama was not tried and convicted. He was executed. But by now any military or other world leader should know not to take money, aid or training from the US. Both bin laden and hussein were allies before they were enemies. To condone what he did is to condone the same guys coming into your house at night and doing the same thing to you and yours.
hurchel 9 months ago
Did Fox News is right for the first time.
IamJacksColon4 9 months ago
America has been the major sponser of terrorism for decades,so the killing of an unarmed man in front of his children is no surprise.Your navy seals are no heroes, their just a pack of fucking cowardly inhuman bastards. Bin Laden has won! he has brutalised you into primitivism and barbarity, into mirror images of himself.
mister18cm 9 months ago
@mister18cm sorry boss but while I agree with you on your critique of American chauvinism you are way of the mark trying to paint anyone like Osama as anything other than what he was a party to the murder of thousands. In my opinion he should have been killed by th seals early on and the war should never have started. And of course the American politicians who started this war should face justice with the option of execution on the table.
kanto2233 9 months ago 7
@mister18cm However, I am a little embarrassed that you believe that there is never a cause for violence. you logic is flawed. should it be tempered by wisdom yes, but should self defense and revenge be taken off the table no. I think that if you held a mirror up to yourself you would realize that as a human being you are obligated to "brutality" for protection of yourself and others. To love your enemies is truly immoral.
kanto2233 9 months ago
I'm also confused...people keep saying Bin Laden was the mastermind behind the NY attacks...but why was he never credited to being this mastermind on the FBI site?
PhreakPhantom 9 months ago
@MullyROI I the US, you can't sell pork calling it beef but the word "news" is not "defined" by the government to have a fixed meaning. I have heard that Fox News can't broadcast in Canada because there the word is defined. You have to be willing to stand behind the reports and are stating that to the best of your knowledge it is the truth. I think it may also be a protected term in many places in Europe too. I don't know. Perhaps someone from over there will comment.
knowledgemonger 9 months ago
funny FOX news and there ilk all said that Manning and assange should be killed. Shit Palin said we should take Assange out. lets think OBL some how is less than Assange? man these guys are retarded
Roninlord25a 9 months ago
OH MY!!!
this is hilarious.
Well said Cenk.
TikiKid 9 months ago
stupid fucks
drsamhouse 9 months ago
im glad to see fox got new graphics.
if seems like the other graphics were from 1990's.
CAR18MEN 9 months ago
well done killing bin larden. but you have to respect killing prabakaran as well.because larden a such a head ace for americans freedom as well as prabakaran is to sri lankans.pls dont hurt us using human rights that you dont have as you saying.
03020870 9 months ago
I see that Liberals are mourning over the loss of their favorite icon, Osama Bin Laden. Their Islamic terrorist President killed him no less in order to make it look like Barack Osama actually isn't a traitor to our nation. Liberals and President Osama are both traitors and that's an undeniable fact. I'm not sure why liberal fucktards love to embrace Islam, possibly because of their warm and fuzzy multee-culturaleesm.
IAmHotize 9 months ago
@IAmHotize - Wow. I love how you manage to be ignorant and a twat all at once!!
dogkoota 9 months ago
@dogkoota a twat? So you're a Communist English fucktard? The UK is just lucky that the United States doesn't roll out of bed one day and decide to take it over.
IAmHotize 9 months ago
@IAmHotize there is no joy in the little corner idiot land where you live is there? :(
kanto2233 9 months ago
@kanto2233 go hold hands with Islamic terrorists all warm and fuzzy-like, you libtard.
IAmHotize 9 months ago
@IAmHotize ohh I love this game! :) doouche nozzzle, republicunt, conservaprick, tea bag Meister, Islamaphomoron, nipple dick, Fox licker, Beckhole= you! :)
kanto2233 9 months ago 2
@kanto2233 Dude, my face hurts from laughter
xcruzrr6 9 months ago 2
@xcruzrr6 at what? was it something I said? :)
kanto2233 9 months ago
@kanto2233 Republicunt, conservaprick, nipple dick LMAO
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
@kanto2233 What a crazy person he/she is.
ThumbprintTheatrics 9 months ago
@IAmHotize Man SHUT THE FUCK UP. You sound sooooo stupid. Yea sure, we're sooo grieving. Dumbass
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
@xcruzrr6 I realize you libtards are grieving over the loss of your hero, and you reject the truth of Christ while embracing the false religion of Islam, but that's no reason to be rude. That's another thing liberals have trouble with, controlling their anger.
IAmHotize 9 months ago
@IAmHotize Oh please. After all that BS you spouted in your first comment? Rude? Anger? Obviously you're familiar with them. I don't see anyone grieving over here buddy. I can't fathom why you think that. You guys are the ones questioning whether or not we should have killed the scumbag.
xcruzrr6 9 months ago
@IAmHotize
Look around fucknuts, does it look like anyone is mourning to you? We're all fucking celebrating. Jon Stewart is celebrating, Cenk Uygur is celebrating, And YOUR PRESIDENT, Barack Obama, is celebrating. It's plainly obvious that you did not even watch the video you are commenting on, because it demonstrates clearly that it is CONSERVATIVES, most notably Glen Beck, who are whining and crying, saying it's bad that we killed a terrorist.
prokrastinatorSF 9 months ago
Obama would send his squad after Satan too... if such a person existed!
What would Fox News do with that? Glenn Beck would say "It was an act of evil to kill Satan, because only with the presence of Satan in the World will we have the motivation to stick together and fight evil. With Satan gone, Obama has set himself up to be the new Prince of Darkness. I saw this coming from the beginning."
TommyWylie 9 months ago
@nintendowiirocks111 My point is stop being hypocrites and call them Assassins! But they wont because Assassins sounds bad. Like bribery, they call it lobbying. George Orwell is turning in is grave right now. They change the names of bad things because people get dumb. Bin Laden was supported by the CIA in the past. Sadam was also supported by the U.S. They probably knew too much.
boumar19721972 9 months ago
I hope Obama grows a pair and whacks Ahmadinejad and Kim Jong-Mentally Ill. If he does then I *might* vote for his purple ass again.
SwampThizzle 9 months ago
@47f0 Probably because we have something called due process in the US. Let the government make its case in a trial like Saddam got, and then execute him lawfully. This was frontier justice, and bin Laden was lynched.
mcamelyne 9 months ago
What is it about Hugo Chávez that the Americans fear so much?
robertrulebirtannia 9 months ago
@robertrulebirtannia
He is a head of state who is concerned with people besides the wealthy.
mistacramer 9 months ago
@robertrulebirtannia
Ideologically opposed to US system & doesnt let companies like Coke come in and take the piss like other South American States do.
ArmedBrit 9 months ago
WTH is wrong with Fox news?
rania3830 9 months ago
WTF is wrong with fox
dsastrclan 9 months ago
Cognitive dissonance doesn't begin to describe this shit. Anyway I think comparing OBL to a head-of-state or one of our citizens is asinine. Plus like the obvious, had a GOP president issued the order not a single GOoPer would have been whining about this. That's why I have no tolerance for their shit if it comes from anyone who supported Iraq, WoT, etc. Legality yes is very debatable, but if I'm gonna discuss it it'll be with Glenn Greenwald who has credibility there, not fucking Glenn Beck.
rmyoung87 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Glenn Beck would be organizing a parade if bin Laden was killed under Bush's watch.
What a fucking hypocrite!
gupsphoo 9 months ago
Comment removed
gupsphoo 9 months ago
This is like the fucking twilight zone.
LordOfTheObvious 9 months ago
omg..glen beck wanted to declare war on Pakistan!!
chereadnine 9 months ago
hell if obama do or don't fox news is going 2 put him down i don't believe somebody can do 100% foolishness not even bush can do that democrat or republican stop being hypocrites call people on there bullshit
highgradechub 9 months ago
@highgradechub OF COURRRRSSSEEE!!
lcyw20 9 months ago
i love this guy
kshad26 9 months ago
Jealousy is a curse. They're just jealous their side couldn't DO IT!! :)
goremau 9 months ago
@goremau Nah, they just want to spin. Like tops. They only want to show the Democrats in the worst light possible, and they would use any scenario at hand. They don't care about bin Laden.
lcyw20 9 months ago
@lcyw20 Yes I made the mistake that inferred they 'think' about their positions before spinning off like tops as you say.
It's an automatic reflex with these types I guess. LOL.
goremau 9 months ago
I seemed to recall OBL declaring ware on the USA, wouldn't we have been at war with from that point on? Didn't Obama's order & the SEAL team bring to a completions something originated by GWB?
5lkk 9 months ago
How the fuck are private manning and julian assange (whistleblowers) on the same list with dictators and KSM?? Fox would absolutely LOVE to see the whistleblowers assassination carried out. Legality? Like they give a damn.
sicklesickle 9 months ago
So this isn't a war?.....
cuevas04 9 months ago
If a Republican had killed Bin Laden and they had this kind of discussion on MSNBC with Democrats and Liberals... FOX News would've pointed it out for days to "prove" that MSNBC, Dems and Liberals all hate America and love terrorists. That's always been their M.O.
DisturbedHavok 9 months ago
LOL OBAMA SENDING SEAL TEAM 6 AFTER BRADLEY MANNING ARE YOU SRS
HaloKhyaos 9 months ago
Who cares what fox news thinks? The American people are happy about what the administration did
spencerdev91 9 months ago