Great Documentary: EU - Remote Control (Part 1)

[Emilianosart]

hahahahaha, is so good, is this a joke? this video is ridiculous, sincerely sounds very idiot. Are you trying to convince the British people or are you trying to convince yourself?

[StarbucksInsomnia]

This is one of the funniest pieces of propaganda I've seen to date! and that's alongside the nuclear bomb turtle! 

[suddenlyitsobvious]

*activate and fuel

[UndertheRadarTM]

If it werent for that, I would be an advocate of one-worldism.

[UndertheRadarTM]

Listen up you mindless zombies, globalization has the potential to be a great thing and better all of our lives. The issue is that the people pushing globalization and controlling it are wealthy bankers and corporate executives who do not care about you and will do anything for more power. With technology/weaponization on the rise and the degradation of constitutional rights worldwide, the potential for a brutal system of control is there and will eventually come to fruition.

[rrozenbottel]

this video pissed off many people so I can say with joy: mission accomplished!

We are living in the EURSS.

Thank you Mr. Farage for having the balls (and a few others too).

[suddenlyitsobvious]

@rrozenbottel

It's not a question of Farage having balls. The system always controls both ends of the dialectics it designs & it needs opposition to its plans in order to generate the potential, the energy required to activate a fuel the changes, the steps towards its aims. All the 'ballsy' guys are controlled. They may be so dumb they don't even realize it themselves. Balsy, riotous opposition appeals to the masses and nourishes their self-righteousness. That's why the system uses them...

[robinhoEHkiter]

this documentary is rubish and misleading. 

[JOTTABYTE]

I am so proud of it.



[JOTTABYTE]

EU is a new super power on earth.

Long live the EU!!

.Long live the EU!!

I want ONE goverment!

[vikingmanman]

fuck this shit! the EU is not perfect but its pritty dam good. so stop bitching

[scottishchap2008]

they want there own army and if that happens its game over for the UK, the european union is the soviet union and barroso admitted he was a maoist, mao slaughtered anywere between 65 to 85 million of his own people

[x2factorxxx]

This journalist is full of crap, EU parliament has very lmited power and has almost no influence in national immigration policies; that has been a problem for EU cause what is a point to have EU with no power? So i would tell this guy to stop giving crap to people just to get paid but go back to school and learn some facts. Britain in many policy areas has not even signed with EU law.

[TheThordir]

George Washington wrote to the Marquis de La Fayette: "One day, on the model of the United States of America, a United States of Europe will come into being."

[hawei1992]

The rest of Europe does not want you either so bye!

[jbeatles99]

Kiluminati!!!

[adammark1983]

If i had a fighter plane i would drop a bomb on the EU Parliment and if the UK gets the Euro i would consider migrating to the United States.

[adammark1983]

The European Union is bad and should be destroyed and David Cameron should considering about getting the UK out of the EU.

[Ahuvati]

globalisation its not healthy not for the small developing countries wich are smashed not for the big developed ones wich are smashes but in a different way... we all forget that a country is not made just by its economy a country its made also by its PEOPLE and by its CULTURE and can t grow wealth by losing its people and its culture...

[Nashhinton]

@Socialist53, You're a socialist? You do realize that socialism is a tool made by the devil. Right?

[Ahuvati]

EU and globalisation will bring up the end of the world its obvious

[Nashhinton]

@Ahuvati, Agreed

[paulmrussell12]

And here comes a big truck going the other way with the billions saved on tariffs by being in a single market, with the billions gained by having young Eastern Europeans work the longest hours in the shitiest jobs when our population is aging and the billions saved by being in a security community where nobody in the EU has had to point a missile at each other since its foundation! I mean the EU, especially the Commission has so many flaws but this is just pure UKIP propaganda isn't it!?

[munchkin365]

Britain's independence. This country has never been independent from Germany. We have been ruled by Germany for years. We are told that the Saxe-Coburg Gotha's have no power - but don't believe that this bloodline who have raped, murdered, tortured and and pillaged for 100's of years would give up their power that easily

[UKProtector]

Please please can we leave this corrupted and wasteful unacountable bigots

[vloepkleedje]

britain must not become part of the evil empire.

[SeppeD]

when Nigel Farage is the first person who is interviewed, you know how one-sighted this documentary is gonna get

[Nastaran732]

On the UK deficit note, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) was devised to enable the UK to receive transfer payments that would partially offset its budgetary deficit with the EU caused by its relatively small agriculture sectore...

[like2surf]

Christ here we go again, the GOVERNMENTS YOU VOTED INTO POWER have decided to stay with the EU, deal with it. Vote for the BNP or some other backward party if you want change.

[pixelr0]

this documentary is a waste of time

[munchkin365]

@pixelr0 yeah I agree with you

[zahaj]

Britian didn't have to open its labour market, just like Germany nad France didn't. So it is not true to say that British Government canno't control immigration.

[Tomsanbomsi]

this is kinda pathetic... the british people decided to have a european parliament, along with all other members. so just live with it

[kosboybg]

What a terrible, one sided video. On immigration, in fact in 2004 when the 10 new members were accepted, gave Britain, like any of the old members, the opportunity to block immigrants from Eastern Europe. All major economies like Germany, France etc. did, and still do. Only Britain opened borders, so that it can benefit from low labour costs. Blaming Brussels for it is RIDICULOUS. This is one of the CRAPPIEST documentaries I have ever seen.

[DeathToChaosGods]

@kosboybg It's not supposed to be a documentary, they're trying to advocate a particular position from their point of view. Still I agree that the overcrowding of Britain could never have happened without the connivance of the British government who just throw their hands in resignation and say "we can't stop them coming here, the EU won't let us."

[WheGotBoredVideos]

@DeathToChaosGods if it is not supposed to be a documentary, why does is say it is in it's title?

[bobshenix]

@kosboybg

Regardless of exactly which political institution owns the larger share of blame for how Britain's "open floodgates" immigration policy got so out of control-- the fact remains whether the Eurocrats in Brussels or the political elites in London are more responsible, this was certainly NOT orchestrated via the political will of the ordinary British citizen.

Political correctness has kept the majority silent, but again and again polls show that the average Briton did not ask for this.

[TheRacistsMustDie]

@kosboybg It's a favorite game of European politicians, when something good happens because of the EU they act as if they did it & when they have to take difficult measures they say that they were ordered to do it by the EU.

[kosboybg]

What a terrible, one sided video. On immigration, in fact in 2004 when the 10 new members were accepted, gave Britain, like any of the old members, the opportunity to block immigrants from Eastern Europe. All major economies like Germany, France etc. did, and still do. Only Britain opened borders, so that it can benefit from low labour costs. Blaming Brussels for it is RIDICULOUS. This is one of the CRAPPIEST documentaries I have ever seen.

[schtrule]

Great documentary?!

C`mon, this is pointless.

[macstheallseing]

Shame this documentary shows a imagem like the british isnt one of the most influential blocs on the EU. As u know, unfortunetly the EU function on a lobby type of way, and British government and economic groups make sure that it stays that way. Plus being one of the big countries, almost nothing is made in europe without the avail of british government. This documentary shows a one way position. States have to be fully commited to europe right? If not why have u decide to integrate EU?

[Jack101f]

just to let you guy know UKIP=Nazis that is a Fact

[TheEmperorhirohito]

Am I the only person that likes The EU

[zibbezabba]

no, there are 3 other people too

[Spenner56]

Well 2 actually..

I used to like the EU because I thought they would protect our sovereign countries from GM crops,from militarization and cheap foreign labour. Now our countries are dictated to,the unelected commission is introducing GM potatos,wants an EU army and factories are closing in Germany and moving to Romania.

They refused to accept the Dutch and French NO vote on the constitution and then changed it to the Lisbon Treaty (and made the Irish vote again after their NO) !

Count me out.

[georgehennessy]

How come Switzerland isn't apart of the EU? Do the Swiss know something we all don't? (Besides cheese, clocks, watches, freedom, blah, blah, blah)

[hartmut1164]

Switzerland is a defacto member of the EU. Almost any EU-legislation becomes effective in Switzerland too. Judgments of the court in Luxembourg in respect of Title VI (Police and judicial cooperation), social security and interpretation of the treaties are law in Switzerland without any act of the swizz authorities or law makers.

You may have a read in the so-called "Bilateral Treaties" between Switzerland and the EU.

[georgehennessy]

blah blah blah, you're still full of shit.

[hartmut1164]

Most intelligent posting ... I am really impressed! The quality of your wording gives a witness regarding your mind.

You issued your own testimonial!

[munchkin365]

@georgehennessy the elites bank their money there

[macboyau]

Wait, so.. This is about there being too many foreigners here? What the hell man? The UK is not in a bad way. Stop scaremongering..

[zibbezabba]

@macboyau - Its like this, you invite a friend around for dinner and go shopping for the ingredients for your meal. The peron you invited tells everyone that they are going to yours for dinner. Pretty soon lots of people arrive at your home expecting a meal and you aint got the food to feed them all...

[macboyau]

You can still prosper even with increased immigration, you just want work a blue collar job to do that though.

[Lloyidian]

You are forgetting an important fact. Most of the legal immigrants are actually coming to work in the UK, thus contribute to the state treasury...the 'dinner' case you've chosen to back up your theory actually does not reflect the real situation at all..sorry! Try to get any statistics before you make another hasty judgement next time!

[zibbezabba]

True, they contribute if they are working, but if not... statistics? our own government do not know themselves the ratio of working migrants v non working migrants. I dont have official clearance to this sort of information so sorry to be so 'un-empirical'

Are you trying to argue that there should be no restriction on immigration if so then I suspect your argument is intrinsically flawed.

you say I made a hasty judgement?

freely expressing my opinion on youtube?

oh well, nobody's perfect

[CroTechno]

this video is 70% counterproductive..VIVAT EUROPA!

[maelstone]

Eu is the new roman empire...damn it to hell...

[Paddis92]

So the UKs welfare system is unrivaled in the EU? I find that very hard to believe.

[MsEiceEK]

Why do you think they all come here then? Our sunny weather and beaches? lol

[XodoX]

What the hell? Why are the brits complaning? They got hit harder by the economic downturn , since they do not have the EURO. And they do know that if they were to leave the E.U. , they would be screwed.

They can't live without the E.U. And it's a good thing. I like the E.U !

[00000Dean00000]

If we had the Euro, we would of had no power to regulate our rates and would be FAR worse off.

Don't believe me? Look at Greece.

[hartmut1164]

@00000Dean00000

The EMS-regulations forces governments to keep their finances in roughly good order. The treasury is currently borrowing bio. of £ by the Bank of England. In the Euro zone that irresponsible borrowing would be not possible.

Currency is to important to leave it politicians not looking further than the next election. Therefore the ECB is independent from the governments and the commission.

[00000Dean00000]

@hartmut1164 Countries need to be able to adjust thier own inflation and currency rates to meet their own dynamic needs at the time.

Having a one size fits all monetary system leaves some countries lingering in reccesion, whilst overs grow so much they overheat.

Prime examples - Greece and Germany.

[hartmut1164]

I would not call this "adjustment", but robbery on the savings of their citizens.

Raising inflation or devaluation of the currency is just stealing with an other name. If a nation does consume more than it produces than it had to cut spending.

[codownni]

The EU has not sighned off on its budget for over a DECADE. A ex EU treasoury employee was sacked after admitting that the EU can not acount for 95% of its BILLIONS.

[hartmut1164]

Nonsense - To quote the Auditors' report for 2009: "In the Courts opinion, Revenue, commitments for all policy groups and payments underlying the accounts for the year ended 31 December 2008 for the policy groups Education and Citizenship and Administrative and other expenditure in all

material respects are legal and regular." and so on for any other area of EU-politics (Source: Official Journal, 11 Nov. 2009) - read the original report and don't believe the tabloids.

[hartmut1164]

If the strict EU-audit regulation would be used in the UK, no budget since Henry VII would be "signed".

[codownni]

You have done your research so respect to you for that. But how can you support this EU dictatorship?

[hartmut1164]

The big chunk of the EU's budget is spend by national governments - not the EU directly. The research is done by the European Court of Auditors and their report is published annually.

Which dictatorship? Each EU-regulation has to be agreed between the Council of Ministers (the representatives of the member states) and the parliament. Law making in the EU is painstaking slow process of comprise finding - certainly not a hallmark of a "dictator ship".

[codownni]

A forced polictical union with other country's is Dictatorship. We have not had one say wheather we want to be a part of this. We have not had one vote. We don not want to be part of the EU. We now have no soverighntey of our Country.

[hartmut1164]

"Sovereignty" is a legal fiction, created to bring some order into Europe after the Thirty Years War.

---

Britain in 1974 for the treaties, treaties which clearly stated the goal of an "ever closer union". The political union was part of the agenda since the Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950. There was to point any doubt regarding the goal of the unification process.

No vote? Did you vote for the union between Scotland and England? Or for the form of government?

So why now this crying?

[codownni]

Sovereignty, is not a fiction. The people of the Country have the right to make the decisions of that Country. A fundemental part of a Democracy is that no Goverment can bind its predecessor. So the Trade agreement that was sighned over three decades ago is worthless today. When the British people voted on the EU, they had no idea they where binding there children to political Union with other member states. Especially ones that were not even in the Union at that time.

[hartmut1164]

It is a fiction, because the real power lies with the economic relations. Nations are nothing more than administrative units - it is irrational and mythic to see a nation as something else.

---

A fundamental part of international law is the principle "pacta sunt servanda". Britian entered the treaties and has to fulfill its obligations.

I don't know what the British people had an idea of, but the decision of the court in Luxembourg in the case Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L in 1964 (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

it became apparent that the ECC is more than a mere trade agreement: "BY CONTRAST WITH ORDINARY INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, THE EEC TREATY HAS CREATED ITS OWN LEGAL SYSTEM WHICH, ON THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE TREATY, BECAME AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE MEMBER STATES AND WHICH THEIR COURTS ARE BOUND TO APPLY ." - this was known since 1964, published and well known.

So what's the problem?

---

But still unanswered: When you voted regarding the union of 1707?

[hartmut1164]

Better enjoy saying "civis europeus sum" and enjoy the privilege of being the citizen of the EU.

[codownni]

You are not worth talking to. We didnt Vote for political union with Europe. We didnt vote for a loss of Democracy and Soverighnty. We will leave the EU. As far as all your qoutes from documents in the 50's or 60's, you must know that none of the public knew of them or of the full ramifications of them. Why talk about 1707? its 2010. A time when devolusion was voted for in Scotland, Northern Ireland etc.

[hartmut1164]

First: Those documents are very well known. I went in 1970s/80s in school and I learned their. Those decision were reported in the newspapers - don't take the people for total idiots.

---

"Sovereignty" is not taken away from the people but put on an other democratic elected level - the EU. The voting system for the EU-parliament may be not perfect, but still better than for Westminster. The Commission is elected by the Council of Ministers (representing the member states) and (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

confirmed by the parliament after a hearing - was ever in Westminster a grilling of minister before they could take office?

As the law stand today: The only safeguard for the liberties of the people not being subject to a simple majority in the Westminster parliament are the EU-treaties.

---

Beside this "little" fact: The EU gives the freedom to settle and work anywhere within the EU - or to do business.

See the EU as a larger motherland - as the anthem states:

[hartmut1164]

"Semper regant in Europa

fides et iustitia

et libertas populorum

in maiore patria. "

[codownni]

Where you educated in a public school by any chance? The EU is not even on the National Curiculum. Many people who had a chance to vote in the 70's did not understand what the so called "common Market" would lead to. A well planned deception admitted by the like of the ex Italian president. Soverignty has been taken away. 85% of our laws come from Brussels. We have no controll over our own borders. May not be perfect? We didnt get a vote.All no votes where ignored. Disgraceful revival of the SU.

[hartmut1164]

I went to state schools - but in Germany. If the EU is not part of the National Curriculum it is simply idiotic: Whatever your stand to the EU is, or even if the UK would leave the EU, the EU will dominate British politics and economics for foreseeable future. So knowledge regarding the history and functioning of the EU is of up-most importance.

Even in early 1970s the "Common Market" was much more than mere trade agreement. The case law of the court in Luxembourg (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

the early 1950s. The facts were clear, just a look into the preamble of the Treaty of Rome would make this clear.

---

"85% of laws" - the most are regulation regarding e.g. the production of food. If you want to have free trade, you common standards. Do ever wondered why US-beef is never sold in Europe? The reason is that the US beef production does not follow EU-regulation, in the opposite to e.g. Brazil.

Key areas of sovereignty, like defence, foreign politics, criminal justice, (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

are still predominately within the national law making. The EU can only act in this areas when all member states do agree: Therefore the EU can act in Bosnia, but had no politics in the Iraq war.

The UK government is waiving away real sovereignty in this areas to the USA - without having a real say. So UK citizens can be extradite to the USA, but US-citizens not to the UK. The CIA can act most freely in the UK, but MI5/6 not in the USA, etc. etc. pp. (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

It was recently the EU-parliament which denied the transfer of European bank data to the US (Swift-agreement). I would be more than surprised if the spineless House of Commons would make such a stand against the government and the USA.

Like it or not: Our civil liberties are better protected by the EU-court in Luxembourg, the court for Human Rights in Strasbourg and the EU-parliament than with political system in Westminster and Whitehall.

[hartmut1164]

A final word regarding "Sovereignty": There is no reason why sovereignty can't be split on different levels: It is the French and British theory that the supreme sovereignty is vested in one institution.

Germany mainted, except the brief time under Hitler, since the reforms of 1495 a more complex theory that the supreme power can be split on different layer of the state. The German state do act - on a national and international level - on (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

own right as sovereign states besides the sovereign federal institutions. They enter international treaties and have their own representation with the EU and other states.

This concept of the sovereignty, as the supreme power invested in different layers, is harder to understand than the French/British concept, but is IMHO better suited for more-and-more complex world, because it is the most flexible.

[hartmut1164]

Correction: I wrote "The German state do act ..." correct is "The 16 German states do act ..."

[Spenner56]

WRONG according to the German constitutional Court ruling from 2009 :

"With Declaration No.17 Concerning Primacy annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, the Federal Republic of Germany does not recognise an absolute primacy of application of Union law, which would be constitutionally objectionable, but merely confirms the legal situation as it has been interpreted by the Federal Constitutional Court. . ." (Par. 331)

Thank God someone still believes in democracy !

[Spenner56]

You are right,and the German Constitutional Court agrees :

"After the realisation of the principle of the sovereignty of the people in Europe, only the peoples of the Member States can dispose of their respective constituent powers and of the sovereignty of the state. Without the expressly declared will of the peoples, the elected bodies are not competent to create a new subject of legitimisation, or to deligitimise the existing ones, in the constitutional areas of their states." (Par. 347)

[hartmut1164]

@Spenner56

In its Prgh. 331 the court refers back to its judgement regarding the Maastrich treaty. In this judgement the court reserved for himself the right to check the implementation of EU-legislation according to the Human Rights, as outlined in Art. 1-19 of the German Constitution. Germany's postwar constitution defines that those Human Rights are supreme law of the country. (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

In practical terms there were clashes between the German law maker and the court, but the German Constitutional Court never denied the principle supremacy of EU-law.

---

The problem a new European (aka EU-)sovereign the court addressed is the lack of real political discussion of the people on a EU-level. Which is explainable:

One factor are the media, not really reporting on EU-affairs like they do on national politics, an other problem (cont.)

[hartmut1164]

are the issues on EU-level. The great decision on "peace and war", taxes, health service, education, etc. are still made on a national (or regional) level. The most EU-legislation is filled up with technicalities, hard to understand outside a particular profession. You just don't get the great emotions boiling on a directive regarding duty regulations for beef imports or standards for cross-border purchases for customer protection. Such legislation is important, but not "nation building".

[urfadder]

This video is brought to you by:

FOX NEWS

FAIR AND BALANCED

[cestmoi974]

La France n'a pas dit non à l'Europe, elle a dit non à la constitution qui lui avait été présenté ! C'est tres différent.

[Spenner56]

Ireland Vote NO if you want to keep your own constitution,habeaus corpus,your own parliament and own laws and your OWN police on the streets (google the EU's own para-military : European Gendarmerie Force).

Vote NO for the Dutch and French and millions of decent law-abiding Europeans like me denied a say on the out-sourcing of democracy.

Say NO to an imposed new "citizenship" no one asked you if you wanted.

Say NO to your rights being defined by an EU "court".

Google : No2Lisbon2

[hartmut1164]

In which respect the Lisbon treaty does inflict on habeaus corpus?

[Spenner56]

Google : EU Corpus Juris.

[hartmut1164]

There is a thing like the body of Eu-law, the Acquis Communautaire, but this has low implications into the criminal justice system, except in the cases of the EU-extradition, but this means your right of habeaus corpus is not abolish, but those protections will be safeguard by a court of an other EU member state.

Therefore the standards outlined in Title VI of the treaty.

[Kamadeva01]

I wont be watching this because i already know what it's going to say.

one thing tho, if this guy(Nigel Farage) is so against EU, and also his countrymen which comment here and probably everywhere they can, why don't you make a referendum and ask the people in UK if they want to leave the EU.

problem solved.you get out of EU and the union continues to whatever end it has.

[kytekutter]

The North American Union will be modelled the same way as the E.U... Nice video.

[doggyBoog]

And one more thing, if it wasn't for the eastern europeans taking support from the UK, there would not be even one decent looking girl there.

[doggyBoog]

What a joke, UK tries to make there first conspiracy vid in the tone of the US and make it for the brain dead. Its that the UK think they are special

[graogramano]

Who cares about the UK ?!

Still killing people abroad by almost all means possible, just to become wealthier.

ANd don't forget that the UK is responsible for many still ongoing wars in africa and many ohter countries. including Middle East.

[spudpeel]

Im not killing people, and I care about UK.

Besides, the UK isnt doing too well at all. I take it you dont live here?

[graogramano]

No i don't. But just so you know, people in industrial countries are always better off than the rest of the world (except maybe US citizens), even when they have financial problems at times. You at least have a social safety net that won't let you die. and if you live in the UK and didn't go all out to fight against your goverments policies you are very well supporting or not caring about the atrocities that are not only done in Iraq but many other regions in the world. Do sth against it!

[spudpeel]

I agree that things are miles better here than in other places, but that doesnt mean I should be happy with everything that happens.

I was too young to know what was going on when we went to war but I am definitely not in favour of it now.

[graogramano]

Ah ok, that's different then!

But i have to add one thing that is very important and many people tend to forget, ignore or might just not know about it, but Europe's richest countries and north america are so powerful and rich because they enslaved people and stole their countries resources. That's why you have so many luxuries in those countries and so manypeople that grew up in wealth, where they had the time to educate themselves.

[Lik2012]

Hitlers EU after WW2.

Rich get richer like then and the restu of us pay it

[Skabeeri]

Long live the EU!

[outbreak2k4]

damn the English really don't like the EU, chill out life isn't that bad guys

[thefayed]

This is biased. The Parliament in the EU is actually less powerful than the Council of Ministers and the Com EU is Commission. Moreover the Parliament of the EU is directly elected.

[Spenner56]

The President of the German liberal party FDP in the European Parliament, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, said recently:

"if the EU itself applied for membership of the EU, it would be refused. The reason would be: no democracy". She added: "Meanwhile more and more competences have been transferred to the EU level, without the EU structures having become more democratic".

(German Handelsblatt newspaper ).

Vote in the June elections against the corruption of European ideals & values. Vote for freedom.

[hartmut1164]

The EU is still more transparent than e.g. the UK-government.

Pushing 48 pages laws through parliament in a few days, as happened with the "Lex Northern Rock", wouldn't be possible.

Given the fact that there is not clear majority in EU-Parliament the real scrutiny regarding legislation is much stronger than in national parliaments in which a governing party commands a majority.

May it is formally less democratic, but the quality of legislation is higher.

[Chewbacca2000]

How about the "culture" of power crazed international elitism, which seeks to manipulate the people of the world into accepting a globalized version of the EU, or "World Government"? I love the European cultures (especially France's) so you're wrong buddy, wrong in many ways and immensely ignorant yourself. Go research "The Bilderberg Group".

[conker141]

britain was once a country to be proud of i cant believe the state were in now is this what our forefathers fought for, they would turn in their graves if they seen us now i cant watch part 2 its winding me up so much i would emigrate if i could what a shithole it is now

[RenneDanjoule]

Obama or McCain this will happen. The Oligarchy/Plutocracy runs the country. The money suply through the federal reserve, the media through the trilateral comission and CFR. David Rockefeller is a major player in all of this, along with the Rothschilds and many others. True representative government is at the local level. The furhter it goes from there, the less it represents you and your neighbours, and the less power you have to change government policy that affects you.

[jeaubu]

Get ready folks, this is coming to the US with Obama's election!

[Barbaricfellow]

Great doc indeed!

The Lisbon treaty is a disgrace and MUCH worse then anyone thinks that hasn't looked into it.

BTW.. of all the leading economies Japan is the one with the most inhabitants/km².

[kurydebarcelona]

5 *!