canon makes the best AF lenses and has a huge a variety of them to boot. Zeiss takes the king in sharpness for the 21mm and 100mm ZE however canon's 24mm tse mk 2 is comparable to the zeiss 21mm. I prefer the white balance off the nikon cameras but don't like how all the options are reversed (zooming, dials, etc.)
@DigitalRevCom Hey Kai, you mentioned in this review that all IS versions of these lenses are weather sealed. Then you point out that the f2.8 you were holding was a non-IS. This left me with the impression that the f2.8 non-IS is not weather sealed. However, according to Canon's website the f2.8 (non-IS) is indeed weather sealed. Thought maybe you should know as I was looking at your site and there's no mention of this at the specs info.
jonathanyip343: somebody told me the canon 70-200 f2.8 is not enough wide for landscape and advise me buy a canon 24/f2.8 for wide.it will combine with canon 70-200.but is this a combo good enough for all my purpose(potrait,streetlife and landscape).can i use only 70-200f2.8 like the lens kit???
@thaininhdo you can take any landscapes picture with any lens. Clearly that person who said that 70-200mm f/2.8 can't take landscape needs to learn how to take photos from scratch again. A clue for you: COMPRESION
The 70-200 f/2.8 II is AWESOME. When I was reviewing shots there were some that I thought were for sure from the 135L, but they ended up being from the 70-200. That says a lot.
Dud Mr DigitalRevCom,you make me laugh to death about the whole scenery. while people protesting and trying to solving their problems. you chasing them giving lecture about lenses. Probably mad duds in their mind thinking your going to report the situation to newspapers for their demands. hahaha .... good job anyway I like your 10min youtubes
It's always funny to see people still asking which item is the best in every single comparison video they made. If you have the money, pick the most expensive one (price = quality). If not, just pick one that suits your budget, even try those 3rd party lens out there. Every lens has their own sweet spot that you can exploit. Only TROLLS who worries all the time about their gear instead of investing their time in learning how to make a good shot
I have a 70-200 2.8l (old version).. Im planning to sell it because it seems obsolete now that I'm using my 24-70 2.8l more often .. Lol maybe I should keep on trying out new things with the telephoto.
Hi there ! I wonder if this lens would be any good for Motorsport photography (rally)?? Im talking about "Canon 70-200 IS USM 4.0. I'm gonna use it with a Canon 7D :)
Great review guys, but Kai - when you were shooting the protest, you probably should've brought your shutter speed down to 1/4000th or lower. Seems like 1/6400th was a bit too fast.
@sondreborseth If your shooting nothing but daytime photos and studio work yes. Otherwise, I would continue savings. I've been in the same spot as you about a year ago. I decided to wait to pick up the 70-200 2.8 IS II and I will use this line for years to come. It's a beast.
@ChildersFilms hmm i rather save for the IS lense... after trying to shoot with and 80-200mm i lent from a friend.. (whitout IS) damn its hard to keep stedy.. so yeah i think im gonna save... but again.. will this lense work for bird photography?
@TUTIMIO123 60D is much cheaper leaving you a few more dollars to buy a 50mm 1.4 or similar, but the 7D is superior in terms of build quality. Image wise, the T2i, T3i, 60D, and 7D are all about the same.
@BorislavX I have always said go big or go home. Think of it as an investment into your future. I'm a student and I always though about the cheaper options. Waited a few more months and bought the IS II and I don't regret it at all.
@ChildersFilms The best setup I had was a D3s with 24-70 and 70-200 v2. I had it for 3 months and had to sell. I actually made money on every single piece of equipment because it was right after the flood and nobody had them in stock. My wife allowed me to get something cheaper :) So I went with MK2 24-70 70-200 IS 1. It's a huge downgrade from the D3S but hey, what can you do...
@BorislavX One of my friends that shoots for the Daily News in Bowling Green, Kentucky has two D3s. His lens setup is killer too 24-70, 70-200, 300mm and a couple primes. I've only been shooting for 2 years. Still in school and haven't taken things to the next level yet. Still trying to get my gear where I would like it. I love my Canon gear, but that D4 that is rumored might make me drop it all and head on over.
@thesupe87 I mean IS.. I wouldn't sacrifice an f/4 lens with IS for an f/2.8 lens without it.. the ones i'd mostly be tempted to do that with is a 24-105 and a 24-70..
recently i had bought 5d mk II and this lens 70-200 f/2.8 II in 33000 hk dollar(damn !! my all money gone lol)..but the pictures quality are fucking awesome...
I would say any walk around lens, like the 18-135 or the 18-200... and if you're looking for amazing optics go for the higher reach ones like the L 24-105 or the L 24-70 :)
I seriously hate IS being referred to in terms of "stops". So Mr. Shakey Hands is going to get the same amount of stops reduced as Mr. Still Hands? I don't think so... where do they come up this this shit?
I am currently trying to self teach myself some higher end of photography. But he keeps mentioning in several videos "boogar" or something I cant understand. Can anyone explain what he is meaning so i can keep up with the reviews?
@xavier0307 He's talking about bokeh. It is the out-of-focus blur behind the main subject. Some lenses have a smoother more pleasant look to this area than others...
THE arguement pointless. Unless u only shoot on a tripod with a remote, u don't need IS. If your a serious photographer the yes, the IS isnthenbest option. Stop trying to compare this lens to Nikons or Sigmas. The truth is the IS ii is the best lens in it's class. Period.
How big of a difference is there shooting video without IS? I'm interested in getting the 70-200 f/4 L non-IS because of the low cost. Would I be making a mistake?
@masuda316 The non IS lens is a great lens, if you have a camera with good iso capabilities such as the 550d, or 7d then its fantastic, so long as you keep the shutter speed above 200 at 200mm then you can get some amazing shots hand held! It is a truly stunning lens for the price!
@masuda316 in terms of sharpness and image quality... no mistake with the 70-200 f4 L non IS very sharp lens... i have used it for quite some time.... as long as there is ample light then no shutter lag to make the image blurry. no mistake there my friend... but if you plan to use it indoors with low light.... then that is going to be a big no no...
@kickyourasspls Dear kickyourass... please type your sentence coherently. (PS) i know what IS means and what it does... what i was asking for is a comparison video... get it?
I bought the version whitout the Is for 800euro.,The new one whit IS version 2 whill cost in the Netherlands 2200euros., thats 1400euros more.,Who needs nowadays IS if you put the 5d2 on 1600 ISO?? Nobody uses these lenses wide open .,its not a portrait lens.,put it on F5.6 for best performence.than you will see all 3 lenses give the same picture.
I bought the 70-200 f/4 IS recently. It's just as sharp as the f/2.8 II lens, and it's half the price, along with half the weight. If I really need 2.8, I'll just bump up the ISO or grab my 135L.
@KPGLGFK I have the MK II f2.8 IS and after comparing shots with and without the IS switched on... believe me, it's incredible! When you think you are holding the camera steady with IS off and then compare with a stabilized shot there is a huge difference. It's quite clear to me that if choosing non-IS you might as well save a load of money and choose non-L series lens, because you'll never realise the full image capablity of the lens without IS !!
@simonsgl Canon 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS, is Good Lens & Also Sharp too... there are so many Good Picts from Canon 70-200 F2.8 Non IS, but when you're comparing between 70-200 F4 L IS and 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS, i'd rather choose 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS
@zarubinartema А предстовляешь он постоянно только серьёзно всё говорит, вырожения лиц.. Этож не человек тогда а говорящий робот.. :) Шоу достойное, он и шутки кидает. А про молодец ты прав!
At 1:25 you can se it is written, "image stabilized" on the lens.
I think the upgraded version of f4 isn't just an IS plus, it has different optical construction too.
Just cause I am thinking of buying one of these lens, but the ones i can really afford are the 70-200 f4, f4 is and the f2.8. I think i am going for the f4 for now, it would leave me with the chance of an upgrade when i'll have not just student jobs occasionally...
the lady at 2:39 knocked the cops away? I am not try to condescend the cops, rather I solute them for showing great respect to the civilians. Cops act like a real boss on the street in some countries.
canon makes the best AF lenses and has a huge a variety of them to boot. Zeiss takes the king in sharpness for the 21mm and 100mm ZE however canon's 24mm tse mk 2 is comparable to the zeiss 21mm. I prefer the white balance off the nikon cameras but don't like how all the options are reversed (zooming, dials, etc.)
c2thew 1 day ago
4:11 - you almost dropped that whole camera system!
AntLefty 1 day ago
rapist using the back entrance 5:20
pun intended kai?
MrJayColes 4 days ago
@DigitalRevCom Hey Kai, you mentioned in this review that all IS versions of these lenses are weather sealed. Then you point out that the f2.8 you were holding was a non-IS. This left me with the impression that the f2.8 non-IS is not weather sealed. However, according to Canon's website the f2.8 (non-IS) is indeed weather sealed. Thought maybe you should know as I was looking at your site and there's no mention of this at the specs info.
1TuBe1983 4 days ago
3:09 - "BOKEH! BOKEHMON!" rofl
JoSigurd92 6 days ago
canon are the best cameras in the world :D
GSXRMarshall 6 days ago 3
Top Gear for DSLR's... XD
LueXiong10 1 week ago
power to the people
bobabrun 1 week ago
1:49 thats what she said :P
aaltoni 1 week ago
i love my f/4 :D
OMFGLOLBURTON 1 week ago
They all have same lens. haha
jeanozeroeight 1 week ago
what bag is he carrying?
drojan123 1 week ago
jonathanyip343: somebody told me the canon 70-200 f2.8 is not enough wide for landscape and advise me buy a canon 24/f2.8 for wide.it will combine with canon 70-200.but is this a combo good enough for all my purpose(potrait,streetlife and landscape).can i use only 70-200f2.8 like the lens kit???
thaininhdo 1 week ago
@thaininhdo you can take any landscapes picture with any lens. Clearly that person who said that 70-200mm f/2.8 can't take landscape needs to learn how to take photos from scratch again. A clue for you: COMPRESION
looniaz 1 week ago
if f2.8 was lighter it 'd be better so i think that i'll go to f4 IS. 2.5kg are too much for my back
minoleop 2 weeks ago
Can i use the 70-200 f2.8l usm zoom lens forl landscape?.?.
thaininhdo 2 weeks ago
@thaininhdo why not ?
jonathanyip343 2 weeks ago
@thaininhdo you can, but its not good bc its not wide angle
AcornBurrka 1 week ago
bokehmon =)) gotta love that
rongthienco 2 weeks ago
money shots
theorychile 2 weeks ago
I wish Nikon would make a more affordable 70-200mm f/2.8
samcockram123 2 weeks ago
KONG YEE AH!!!!
xC4Rbonx 2 weeks ago
Why did you not use the IS mk II be better to see how good the new one is?
devonmale69 3 weeks ago
@devonmale69 they did?
Dragon4eva 2 weeks ago
@Dragon4eva it was meant to have been mkI
devonmale69 2 weeks ago
The 70-200 f/2.8 II is AWESOME. When I was reviewing shots there were some that I thought were for sure from the 135L, but they ended up being from the 70-200. That says a lot.
rsmith1240 3 weeks ago
BOKEH
Huddiethegreat 3 weeks ago
Dud Mr DigitalRevCom,you make me laugh to death about the whole scenery. while people protesting and trying to solving their problems. you chasing them giving lecture about lenses. Probably mad duds in their mind thinking your going to report the situation to newspapers for their demands. hahaha .... good job anyway I like your 10min youtubes
AlenaziCompany 3 weeks ago
oh my god the way he says bokeh
elvinwong12 4 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
You are very funny with your comments.
jonvideo 4 weeks ago
bokeh!! bokehmon!!!!
mkpernia 4 weeks ago 5
hi
alichakhari 1 month ago
No the question is, how does an asian have a british accent and lives in an asian community.
lifeisjust1shotaway 1 month ago
bokehmon whahaha
Mexymillion 1 month ago
BE CAREFUL KAI, ASIAN PARKING!!!!!
kk6downing 1 month ago
2:22 the man and woman take the place, they think kai is some reporter then put theirs pict to some news media. LOL
123sasakigmailcom 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
lol @ the end
Tech4U247 1 month ago
Noiaw noiswaw anoiswa. I'm suprised that's allowed outside a court. :p
NFphotography14 1 month ago
@8:08 more epic!
iOtameganeKun 1 month ago
@8:04 so epic
iOtameganeKun 1 month ago
I have a 24-675mm lens
KOJOMOSES 1 month ago
It's always funny to see people still asking which item is the best in every single comparison video they made. If you have the money, pick the most expensive one (price = quality). If not, just pick one that suits your budget, even try those 3rd party lens out there. Every lens has their own sweet spot that you can exploit. Only TROLLS who worries all the time about their gear instead of investing their time in learning how to make a good shot
looniaz 1 month ago 21
@looniaz This is so true. A company like Canon isnt going to release a really bad lens let alone an L series lens.
MrJava200 1 week ago
OK but what about the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS and the IS II version?
phophollety 1 month ago
I would love to see you go out and do some real wildlife photography during one of your reviews
this looks like a great lens, will go check it out , thanks for a great review :)
TheNatureguy01 1 month ago
2:16 we want our fwied wice for two dorrar fiftty nowt phive dorrar!
hARVoThe96 1 month ago
I have a 70-200 2.8l (old version).. Im planning to sell it because it seems obsolete now that I'm using my 24-70 2.8l more often .. Lol maybe I should keep on trying out new things with the telephoto.
dragonfire121 1 month ago
4:35... DAYUM that's clean LOL
azn1221 1 month ago
"Canon 70-200 f4 L USM cheap" - yes, maybe for you Kai ;)
iLackie 2 months ago
@iLackie It is a cheapest "L" lens from Canon, quality = money
majky358 1 month ago
"This guy is jealous on my lens", ha ha ha. He is jealous on 1/6400 s.
Bakteyo 2 months ago 30
Isn't Kai using the 70-200 f/4 IS in this video? If you look closely at around 0:50, it's clear that he's using the IS version in this video.
dannynguyenn 2 months ago
@dannynguyenn I noticed that too.
kylerose1990 2 months ago
Hi there ! I wonder if this lens would be any good for Motorsport photography (rally)?? Im talking about "Canon 70-200 IS USM 4.0. I'm gonna use it with a Canon 7D :)
Can you guys help me out what to choose?
wowcswow 2 months ago
Great review guys, but Kai - when you were shooting the protest, you probably should've brought your shutter speed down to 1/4000th or lower. Seems like 1/6400th was a bit too fast.
kylerose1990 2 months ago
Lol at guys buying 70-200 2.8 for vacation photos
kukimonsterist 2 months ago
is the 70-200 f4 good with the 60D? kinda on a low budget right now.. student life....
sondreborseth 2 months ago
@sondreborseth If your shooting nothing but daytime photos and studio work yes. Otherwise, I would continue savings. I've been in the same spot as you about a year ago. I decided to wait to pick up the 70-200 2.8 IS II and I will use this line for years to come. It's a beast.
ChildersFilms 2 months ago
@ChildersFilms hmm i rather save for the IS lense... after trying to shoot with and 80-200mm i lent from a friend.. (whitout IS) damn its hard to keep stedy.. so yeah i think im gonna save... but again.. will this lense work for bird photography?
sondreborseth 2 months ago
@sondreborseth lol..too short for birdings. You'll need at least 400mm
Shibamobobo 2 months ago
Omg 1337 likes ?!!
gambinophotography 2 months ago
I wanna ask you wish one should I buy canon 60d or 7d?
TUTIMIO123 2 months ago
@TUTIMIO123 60D is much cheaper leaving you a few more dollars to buy a 50mm 1.4 or similar, but the 7D is superior in terms of build quality. Image wise, the T2i, T3i, 60D, and 7D are all about the same.
kylerose1990 2 months ago
What are they protesting?
BorislavX 2 months ago
For a non-professional with a 5dmkii is it worth it to pay 700-800$ more for a 2.8 IS II or just stick with 2.8 IS Version 1?
BorislavX 2 months ago
@BorislavX I have always said go big or go home. Think of it as an investment into your future. I'm a student and I always though about the cheaper options. Waited a few more months and bought the IS II and I don't regret it at all.
ChildersFilms 2 months ago
@ChildersFilms Well, maybe in the future. I'm not a pro. And I bought an IS 1 for 1300. IS 2 was 2200 or whatever. That's almost a grand more.
BorislavX 2 months ago
@BorislavX Either way your still getting a quality lens. I've shot with both and thats what really moved me to the Mk II. To each his own though.
ChildersFilms 2 months ago
@ChildersFilms The best setup I had was a D3s with 24-70 and 70-200 v2. I had it for 3 months and had to sell. I actually made money on every single piece of equipment because it was right after the flood and nobody had them in stock. My wife allowed me to get something cheaper :) So I went with MK2 24-70 70-200 IS 1. It's a huge downgrade from the D3S but hey, what can you do...
BorislavX 2 months ago
@BorislavX One of my friends that shoots for the Daily News in Bowling Green, Kentucky has two D3s. His lens setup is killer too 24-70, 70-200, 300mm and a couple primes. I've only been shooting for 2 years. Still in school and haven't taken things to the next level yet. Still trying to get my gear where I would like it. I love my Canon gear, but that D4 that is rumored might make me drop it all and head on over.
ChildersFilms 2 months ago
@ChildersFilms One word in response to your D4 comment: 1Dx.
InfinityEnterprises 2 months ago
LOLOLOLOLOLOL !!!!!!! I would love to do a shoot with him :D
bleyland629 2 months ago
" oh these guys just jealous my lens "
david320able 2 months ago
f4 all the way
thesupe87 2 months ago
wife "you should buy those white lens"
husband "what?? you have no idea how it's cost!"
Kai : click clik
musedmoments 2 months ago
I wish I could afford a 2.8 version :( I only got the f/4 IS USM ><
BrandonKingVloggin 2 months ago
@BrandonKingVloggin the f2.8 non IS is about the same price as the f4 IS on the used market, check out the forums
thesupe87 2 months ago
@thesupe87 I mean IS.. I wouldn't sacrifice an f/4 lens with IS for an f/2.8 lens without it.. the ones i'd mostly be tempted to do that with is a 24-105 and a 24-70..
BrandonKingVloggin 2 months ago
@BrandonKingVloggin I never had the 24-105, but I just got the 24-70 and im lovin' it
thesupe87 2 months ago
@thesupe87 And so you should :) That's what lens I'm aiming for next.. If only money wasn't a problem hehe
BrandonKingVloggin 2 months ago
'' Those guys are just jealous of my lens ! ''
RayTanZL 2 months ago
recently i had bought 5d mk II and this lens 70-200 f/2.8 II in 33000 hk dollar(damn !! my all money gone lol)..but the pictures quality are fucking awesome...
sujanpun666 3 months ago
What lense do you recomend for shooting music videos I have a t3i
jangis1987 3 months ago
@jangis1987
I would say any walk around lens, like the 18-135 or the 18-200... and if you're looking for amazing optics go for the higher reach ones like the L 24-105 or the L 24-70 :)
But thats just me....
TheBlob6996 3 months ago
can you guys add this lense(s) in a kit with the 600d or the 7d or even the 5d mark 2 or any canon camera that formats it
mobiletechkid 3 months ago
kai please review the tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 VC lens please... will it be as good as the canon 70-200mm f/4?
adzrinmansor 3 months ago
If I need to mount this heave of a lens on the tri-pod then do I need to hold it by the lens as well?
FloppyHatPhotos 3 months ago
Should I get the 70-200mm f4 non IS or the 70-200mm f4 IS?
ruben38181 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I seriously hate IS being referred to in terms of "stops". So Mr. Shakey Hands is going to get the same amount of stops reduced as Mr. Still Hands? I don't think so... where do they come up this this shit?
urwholefamilydied 3 months ago
Any chance of a full review of the 70-200 f4L non IS?
97purna 3 months ago
What are they complaining?
rayne125 3 months ago
oh boy do i wish canon made a nikon mount
JBam094 3 months ago
@JBam094 Seems like they're out there. I know I have a canon mount for my nikon lenses.
urwholefamilydied 3 months ago
I am currently trying to self teach myself some higher end of photography. But he keeps mentioning in several videos "boogar" or something I cant understand. Can anyone explain what he is meaning so i can keep up with the reviews?
xavier0307 4 months ago
@xavier0307 "BOKEH" The amount and quality of the blur from a lens.
rjdriver700 4 months ago
@rjdriver700 thank you
xavier0307 3 months ago
@xavier0307 He's talking about bokeh. It is the out-of-focus blur behind the main subject. Some lenses have a smoother more pleasant look to this area than others...
in2food 3 months ago
@in2food Thank you very much.
xavier0307 3 months ago
damn i really like Mr long hair..
calebjacome 4 months ago
THE arguement pointless. Unless u only shoot on a tripod with a remote, u don't need IS. If your a serious photographer the yes, the IS isnthenbest option. Stop trying to compare this lens to Nikons or Sigmas. The truth is the IS ii is the best lens in it's class. Period.
richieramone1 4 months ago
dude, i would watch your shows on discovery. lovely accent and word selection. never dull.
TribalManners 4 months ago
nikon 70-200 VRII VS canon 70-200 isII!
MrPacMe 4 months ago
@MrPacMe we all know that the vrII is better :)
GacusanAMVs 4 months ago
Man! The turn out for Occupy Hong Kong is very poor...lol
nuohk 4 months ago
Bokehmon!! XD
KrissiBenassi 4 months ago 48
BOKEHMON!
Gladiator2155 4 months ago
How big of a difference is there shooting video without IS? I'm interested in getting the 70-200 f/4 L non-IS because of the low cost. Would I be making a mistake?
masuda316 4 months ago
@masuda316 The non IS lens is a great lens, if you have a camera with good iso capabilities such as the 550d, or 7d then its fantastic, so long as you keep the shutter speed above 200 at 200mm then you can get some amazing shots hand held! It is a truly stunning lens for the price!
thefilmmakerpro 4 months ago
@masuda316 in terms of sharpness and image quality... no mistake with the 70-200 f4 L non IS very sharp lens... i have used it for quite some time.... as long as there is ample light then no shutter lag to make the image blurry. no mistake there my friend... but if you plan to use it indoors with low light.... then that is going to be a big no no...
truknayr23 2 months ago
THE IS II is the best!
mcdus78 5 months ago
Should I get 70-200mm non-IS or 24-70mm ? They are the same price...
fizzyfoster 5 months ago
probably take the back entrance....lolmongers
mumbojumbo1989 5 months ago
the way you hold your camera makes me really nervous...
Alexrulz99 5 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
I find that at f/4 most of my lenses give me the sharpest images.
jambandz 5 months ago
MUCH SHARPER THAN THE WHITOUT IS VERSION? COME ON ,GIVE ME A BREAK
helthuismartin 5 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
LOL!! The 70-200 f/4L USM is cheaper than the 15-85 IS USM and the 17-55 IS USM! (The f/4 was introduced before 2000.)
thejan4129 5 months ago
Dear Kai... we are obviously missing the 70-200 L f4 IS USM... we want that compared with the non IS... so please... can you make another video?
truknayr23 5 months ago 69
@truknayr23 -.- you should know what an IS do,
kickyourasspls 4 months ago
Comment removed
truknayr23 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kickyourasspls Dear kickyourass... please type your sentence coherently. (PS) i know what IS means and what it does... what i was asking for is a comparison video... get it?
truknayr23 4 months ago
@truknayr23 im still looking for a video of that comparison
hayabusakid100 4 months ago
Comment removed
InfinityEnterprises 2 months ago
Pedofiles? or X files?
helthuismartin 5 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
These guys are working for Canon too promote their products.
helthuismartin 5 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
The F 4.0 version is the sharpest one clearly.,Journalist know that., ask them.,it is not only the less weight.
helthuismartin 5 months ago in playlist Video's die door helthuismartin aan de favorieten zijn toegevoegd
I bought the version whitout the Is for 800euro.,The new one whit IS version 2 whill cost in the Netherlands 2200euros., thats 1400euros more.,Who needs nowadays IS if you put the 5d2 on 1600 ISO?? Nobody uses these lenses wide open .,its not a portrait lens.,put it on F5.6 for best performence.than you will see all 3 lenses give the same picture.
helthuismartin 5 months ago
I bought the 70-200 f/4 IS recently. It's just as sharp as the f/2.8 II lens, and it's half the price, along with half the weight. If I really need 2.8, I'll just bump up the ISO or grab my 135L.
reimann4 5 months ago
I cry a little inside when he swings that 5D mark II with the f/2.8 II without a strap.
PahaKeisari 5 months ago
It's good to see that the Government has allowed the right to protest following the transfer.
AustViewer 5 months ago
Ahaha...the rapists probably gonna go out the back entrance...xD Kai's humor never gets old...
willtheweird 6 months ago in playlist DigitalRev Lens Reviews
BOKEHMON
MrPlaystationboy 6 months ago
Bokeh! Bokeh-mon!
seizuristic 6 months ago
"these guys are now jealous of my lens"... after kai said that all of 'em mounted their bazookas.... hahahaha!
ManongPishbol 6 months ago
how does it shoot sports?
HyperSnowOttawa 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLS.!!! PLS.!!! PLS!!! do a review about the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS USM against the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USM...
schiz430 6 months ago
Comment removed
schiz430 6 months ago
omg my 70-200 F4 is coming tomoro :D the six months of saving from my job are all worht it :D
mcnamaranicholas 6 months ago
@mcnamaranicholas with or without is?
krhermansen 6 months ago
@krhermansen with, just for indoor stuff :)
mcnamaranicholas 6 months ago
Wish I would be able to walk around talking photos of people etc without being yelled at or chased down or being looked at weird lol.
NZappletech 6 months ago
Rapists are known for taking the back entrance.
srrtf 6 months ago
oh man.... thanks for this review i made up my mind.... im going for the F4... tnx
blind626 6 months ago
@blind626 with or without is?
krhermansen 6 months ago
Many thanks for clearing up the pros and cons of the f2.8 IS II. It's definitely next on my purchase. Keep the canon reviews coming. Good job.
Atuumasa 6 months ago
Wish I could afford one..
DICSPICS1207 7 months ago
thnk u thank u thank u for this review!!!!
daas8214 7 months ago
I'm getting the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM pretty soon!
AldossariEOS 7 months ago
waiting on battle of the bokah big tele edition
bwinn10 7 months ago
Any Chance in COmparing the 70-200mm f/4 and f/2.8 without IS?
ojtothemax 7 months ago 45
@ojtothemax i'd rather choose 70-200 F2.8 without IS
KPGLGFK 6 months ago
@KPGLGFK I have the MK II f2.8 IS and after comparing shots with and without the IS switched on... believe me, it's incredible! When you think you are holding the camera steady with IS off and then compare with a stabilized shot there is a huge difference. It's quite clear to me that if choosing non-IS you might as well save a load of money and choose non-L series lens, because you'll never realise the full image capablity of the lens without IS !!
simonsgl 5 months ago
@simonsgl Canon 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS, is Good Lens & Also Sharp too... there are so many Good Picts from Canon 70-200 F2.8 Non IS, but when you're comparing between 70-200 F4 L IS and 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS, i'd rather choose 70-200 F2.8 L Non IS
KPGLGFK 5 months ago
@ojtothemax I believe the middle range lens in this vid is the non-IS version... he says so around 3:10
urwholefamilydied 3 months ago
Блять....местами такую хйню несёт..но, в целом, более-менее, почти молодчина.
zarubinartema 8 months ago
@zarubinartema А предстовляешь он постоянно только серьёзно всё говорит, вырожения лиц.. Этож не человек тогда а говорящий робот.. :) Шоу достойное, он и шутки кидает. А про молодец ты прав!
wwild2k 7 months ago
At 8:23, one of the photographer isn't a photojournalist rather a hobbyist. He uses a TLR camera. Anyway, good show!
baguiopunx 8 months ago
Isn't that an f4L IS?
At 1:25 you can se it is written, "image stabilized" on the lens.
I think the upgraded version of f4 isn't just an IS plus, it has different optical construction too.
Just cause I am thinking of buying one of these lens, but the ones i can really afford are the 70-200 f4, f4 is and the f2.8. I think i am going for the f4 for now, it would leave me with the chance of an upgrade when i'll have not just student jobs occasionally...
RezAkos 8 months ago 2
@RezAkos Spot on!! I'm also going for F4, cheapest L lens and great performance.
daas8214 7 months ago
The guy turning around at 8:22 has a TRL! Looks like a Mamiya C330 :o
Polaroidon 8 months ago
Bokehmon
MrPixelFin 8 months ago
why cant they just be all black
xFRAGxMOVIESx 8 months ago
@xFRAGxMOVIESx they are white to prevent them from retaining too much heat in sunlight. bigger lens = bigger issue.
topdeckdog 8 months ago
Fun, informative and entertaining!! Cheers from Norway :)
tomkalbo 8 months ago
Just got the IS version. This lens is razor sharp n fast!! :)
digitallyremixed 8 months ago
the lady at 2:39 knocked the cops away? I am not try to condescend the cops, rather I solute them for showing great respect to the civilians. Cops act like a real boss on the street in some countries.
ngso0009 8 months ago
What does bokeh mean?
slovan 8 months ago
is 70-200mm f4 IS L lens will work on my eos 1000d?
denz112488 8 months ago
@denz112488 yes!
adrianmignogna 8 months ago
PLEASE DO A NIKON 70-200 VR1 VS VR2.... OR THE NIKON 70-200 VR2 VS CANON 70-200 IS MK2. Thanks!
eighty4buick 9 months ago
1.4x vs 2x canon mark II extender !!! pLeAsEEEE
drfrank01 9 months ago
As you can see most pros in the video use canon.
robertlam18 9 months ago
Compare 70-200 canon vs nikon
robertlam18 9 months ago
Are u able to put a tripod collar in the 70-200 f4??
xmateuL2 9 months ago
hahah the guy is jealous of my lense ><
WushuHeros