Just the typical news media fear mongering. If they would really investigate the offenders under the bridge and the registry, you can clearly see that not all sex offenders under the bridge are committed of sex crimes against children, but hey, anything to exploit peoples fears, right?
Gee, how was I able to predict before they even started talking that the liberal Democrat-leaning men and Paula would have sympathy for sex offenders?
It sickens me that "not wanting to force people to live under bridges" can become a left/right issue in some squirrel-brained raged filled American's minds.
At any rate, it should be "a mega cunt super dick/ not a complete and utter waste of space and energy" issue.
Oh, and suck my dick!!! How's that for fucking cogent????!!!!!
The rage-filled one here is YOU, and it's on behalf of molesters, rapists, and sodomites who've preyed on the most innocent and the most defenseless --children.
OK, well, you try to calm down. I gotta go hit the sack and get up for work tomorrow, and NOT molest little children. I figure that'll probably keep me from living under a bridge.
Just a suggestion: If you haven't already, why not become pen pals with some child rapists in a prison in your vicinity? You can commiserate with them, and bemoan how unfair society is to those who've rammed their erect phalluses up the rectum of screaming little boys and girls.
Look, mega cunt, YOU ARE A MEGA CUNT if you think that this is an acceptable situation.
See, there's this thing called "cruel and unusual" punishment, and it's something that was added to our constitution, because the founding fathers thought, "Hey, that should be a basic right."
Or you can get emotional about things, and not think things through thoroughly.
Oh, and I am not arguing with you when I call you a mega cunt. I just think you are a mega cunt.
Yeah, let's not get overly emotional about child rape and destruction of innocence. No biggie.
OK, when you grow up and stop using absurd phrases like mega c*nt -- whatever that means -- get back to me, kiddo.
By the by, I wonder if the framers would really consider this cruel and unusual. I mean, I know YOU do -- but you're an empathizer of pedophiliacs. Lastly, I am not gonna have any more time to reply to a silly kid (you), as I actually have a life and things to do. Bye, junior.
The framers would probably think this is cruel and unusual punishment, considering, at the time of the writing of the constitution, the age of consent for the colonies was around 10 to 12 years old.
Also, I am not a sympathizer of pedophiles. I think that no one should be denied basic human dignity or basic rights, even serial killing child rapists. That's just because I hold myself, and my government, to a higher moral standard than serial child rapists.
You're a sick bastard and not very bright. You think that "consent" by an underage boy or girl is the same as forced rape. I guess little Susie or Jimmy was asking for it, eh? I don't care what English common law once said, a child is not a miniature adult. Their minds are not the same. A kid can't consent to something he/she is ignorant of.
You're a cold-blooded, callous amoral miscreant. Or -- perhaps you were once molested yourself and don't want it to be thought of as something immoral.
And I really do have to move on. Go take your hogwash to child rapist sympathizers.
If you had any balls, I'd ask you to go tell parents of a raped little girl about cruel and unusual punishment of child rapists. We both know you wouldn't. You'd wet your little panties before doing any such thing, YOU WOULDN'T DARE.
My sister was molested, and it was a big fucking deal in my family (The guy that did it had hung himself, which really caused a great deal of trauma in our family.), so get the fuck off of your high horse, fucking dipshit.
Also, excuse me if I think that the 10-12 year old age of consent probably means that the founding fathers might have a different view of pedophilia.
You need to learn how to read. Also, you are still a mega cunt.
well that was pointless... Nothing was resolved. I don't know that we can resolve the issue, but state sponsored homelessness is pretty bad people. And I agree I as a tax payer don't want to pay for them to get houses. But I don't want to pay for them to go back to prison either. MKH as usual didn't offer any actual solution and neither did the other guests.
It's always fascinating how anchors on CNN and other left wing media never attach the word "liberal" to their left-leaning guests, but ALWAYS introduce someone from the right as "conservative". Go to 4:23 of this clip and listen to Paula introduce the guests. This is quite common. Let's make darn sure we single out that damn "conservative" guest!!!!
People like HAM are the kind of people whose dangerous outlook on the situation, when adopted, cause new sex crimes rather than stopping them. Also, that 52% stat is a total lie. See angryoffender dot com and get the facts you need to protect children FOR REAL.
Just as you can't help a mentally ill wacko like Cho in VT without committing him against his will (and violating his rights) you also can't protect a communities children from people who have proven they molest children. Under the present system, you have to turn them loose.
Study the redicisvism rate of sexual offenders. Our justice system does not know how to handle people of this type. The number of these people who victimize again is high, yet all we can do is stick them in prison for a bit, then turn them loose again, whereupon they go after fresh victims. This has been going on for years and people are getting upset about it.
Mary Kuntlike Hall is a fat ugly Cunt. I hope she gets the same kind of justice she is wanting for others, none. She is the lowest form of life. She has no redeeming qualities. She is everything that is vile about American women, and is an embarassment to the Human race. She is the lowest scum on the earth. Hope she gets stuck in an elevator with a real sex offender.
Forcing anyone to live this way, to punish them TWICE for the same crime, and to guarantee their inability to successfully reintegrate into society is unconscionable, and unAmerican,
mary Kuntathrine, the fat ugly whore who supports eliminating the constitution should be made to spend some time under the over pass. I think a cunt like her would enjoy it.
sorry for my friend Steve's foul language, but this subject matter is near and dear to his heart given his "circumstance" I do however agree with him...just not his foul language and namecalling of people who disagree with him. However I do believe that she(MKH) has a very warped view on the issue(referring to sex offenders as animals and all). What ever happened to forgiving people who make mistakes and letting them try to rebuild their lives once they get out of prison?
Great job MKH. That must have been an honor to be a part of. Sex offenders need a life sentence in my opinion. The law does need to change when it pertains to high school students, like an 18 y/o sleeping with a 16 y/o.
I don't see why these people don't move to some rural area where they can live in proper housing and where there are no children around to molest. If it's because of probation rules, those should be flexible enough to solve this problem.
Well by that logic why not just give sex offenders a life sentence without parole on the first offense? And don't forget that includes a 17 year old having oral sex with a 15 year old (Genarlow Wilson got 10 years for that). If that's the severity of laws people want then fine, as long as the laws are applied equally to women sex offenders (yeah, like that'll EVER happen).
The only reason not to do as you suggest is that innocent people might be judged guilty. Second offenses are a great deal less likely to be misdiagnosed, so I'm all for locking THEM up forever.
Your example is ridiculous and the law should be changed to ignore child-child relationships, and maybe even situations involving, say, 17 and 20 year olds. I don't find that sickening and reprehensible as I do child molestation.
I wonder if "conservative" Mary Katharine Ham's has any opinion on this clear violation of equal protection under law / human rights.
If you're a female sex offender (43 yr old molesting a 12 year old boy), you get jail time and then you can live with your former victim (Mary Kay Letourneau) - but if you're a 43 yr old male sex offender molesting a 12 year old girl you'll end up living under a bridge.
This is just another sign of the increasingly poor treatment of male sex offenders who unlike armed robbery or murder convicts, continue to be cut off from society even after they've served their time. Strange that no women sex offenders appear to be subjected to this sort of housing discrimination. I doubt you'll ever see women sex offenders sleeping under a bridge being gnawed on by rats. Only men appear to be deserving of this dehumanized under-the-bridge "troll" treatment.
Why you defending them,you a convicted sex offender?Being as these guys have the highest rate of offending again and the new offenses usually include murder,they should either lock them up for life or make it a capital offense and execute these unreformable subhuman predatory pieces of shit.
I'm asking the question why are female and male sex offenders treated unequally? Where is the female under-the-bridge living space? You want to execute offenders? That's brilliant, then let's start the executions with Mary Kay Letourneau.
In the case of Mary Kay Letourneau even though it was messed up (him being 14 and her being married) it was consesual and should not even be compared to the cases for the likes of Couley in Florida and that lowlife that kidnapped Shasta and killed her mother,her mothers boyfriend,and molested and murdered her brother,now answer my question are you one?
No, I am not a sex offender but I do know someone who is currently mounting a legal defense against a false accusation of sex offenses (that's a whole other issue). And who is comparing cases? MKH is the one implicitly lumping all sex offenders into the "rape a 9 year old" category. So do you believe violent female sex offenders (which do exist) should be housed under bridges as well?
They should get the same punishment as men,I also think the laws need a lot of work even though they'll never be perfect.I also think you need to find a better example than the Letourneau case.
You are wrong. Many studies show that sex offenders have the LOWEST recidivism rate, contrary to what the media and politicians with agenda's would have you believe, and I have many of those studies posted on my blog, with links to the original studies, done by the Department of Justice and other experts in the field.
loli am looking for nice guys who want to chat or give meh a call
SheedaWood 1 year ago
Just the typical news media fear mongering. If they would really investigate the offenders under the bridge and the registry, you can clearly see that not all sex offenders under the bridge are committed of sex crimes against children, but hey, anything to exploit peoples fears, right?
SexOffenderIssues002 2 years ago
Gee, how was I able to predict before they even started talking that the liberal Democrat-leaning men and Paula would have sympathy for sex offenders?
MatthewPA1972 3 years ago 2
God, you're a dickwad.
Jesus Christ, what the fuck is wrong with America?
kives1985 2 years ago
That was a very cogent point you made there.
(Oops, I meant the OPPOSITE of that.)
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
It sickens me that "not wanting to force people to live under bridges" can become a left/right issue in some squirrel-brained raged filled American's minds.
At any rate, it should be "a mega cunt super dick/ not a complete and utter waste of space and energy" issue.
Oh, and suck my dick!!! How's that for fucking cogent????!!!!!
kives1985 2 years ago
Comment removed
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
The rage-filled one here is YOU, and it's on behalf of molesters, rapists, and sodomites who've preyed on the most innocent and the most defenseless --children.
Save the world -- kill yourself. Now.
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
Well of course I am rage-filled, stupidity pisses me off.
EAT SHIT AND DIE FUCKWAD!!! YOU ARE EVERYTHING WRONG WITH AMERICA!!!
kives1985 2 years ago
OK, well, you try to calm down. I gotta go hit the sack and get up for work tomorrow, and NOT molest little children. I figure that'll probably keep me from living under a bridge.
Just a suggestion: If you haven't already, why not become pen pals with some child rapists in a prison in your vicinity? You can commiserate with them, and bemoan how unfair society is to those who've rammed their erect phalluses up the rectum of screaming little boys and girls.
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
Look, mega cunt, YOU ARE A MEGA CUNT if you think that this is an acceptable situation.
See, there's this thing called "cruel and unusual" punishment, and it's something that was added to our constitution, because the founding fathers thought, "Hey, that should be a basic right."
Or you can get emotional about things, and not think things through thoroughly.
Oh, and I am not arguing with you when I call you a mega cunt. I just think you are a mega cunt.
kives1985 2 years ago
Yeah, let's not get overly emotional about child rape and destruction of innocence. No biggie.
OK, when you grow up and stop using absurd phrases like mega c*nt -- whatever that means -- get back to me, kiddo.
By the by, I wonder if the framers would really consider this cruel and unusual. I mean, I know YOU do -- but you're an empathizer of pedophiliacs. Lastly, I am not gonna have any more time to reply to a silly kid (you), as I actually have a life and things to do. Bye, junior.
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
The framers would probably think this is cruel and unusual punishment, considering, at the time of the writing of the constitution, the age of consent for the colonies was around 10 to 12 years old.
Also, I am not a sympathizer of pedophiles. I think that no one should be denied basic human dignity or basic rights, even serial killing child rapists. That's just because I hold myself, and my government, to a higher moral standard than serial child rapists.
kives1985 2 years ago
You're a sick bastard and not very bright. You think that "consent" by an underage boy or girl is the same as forced rape. I guess little Susie or Jimmy was asking for it, eh? I don't care what English common law once said, a child is not a miniature adult. Their minds are not the same. A kid can't consent to something he/she is ignorant of.
You're a cold-blooded, callous amoral miscreant. Or -- perhaps you were once molested yourself and don't want it to be thought of as something immoral.
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
And I really do have to move on. Go take your hogwash to child rapist sympathizers.
If you had any balls, I'd ask you to go tell parents of a raped little girl about cruel and unusual punishment of child rapists. We both know you wouldn't. You'd wet your little panties before doing any such thing, YOU WOULDN'T DARE.
MatthewPA1972 2 years ago
My sister was molested, and it was a big fucking deal in my family (The guy that did it had hung himself, which really caused a great deal of trauma in our family.), so get the fuck off of your high horse, fucking dipshit.
Also, excuse me if I think that the 10-12 year old age of consent probably means that the founding fathers might have a different view of pedophilia.
You need to learn how to read. Also, you are still a mega cunt.
kives1985 2 years ago
MKH - you looked like an ass on here, because you didn't offer a solution. If you need one, ask.
Nominay 4 years ago
Meant to say "bald" guy, my bad.
apocalypse1280 4 years ago
Mary Katharine Ham is HOT! The bold guy is a fag, and Paula Zahn is lame.
apocalypse1280 4 years ago 2
well that was pointless... Nothing was resolved. I don't know that we can resolve the issue, but state sponsored homelessness is pretty bad people. And I agree I as a tax payer don't want to pay for them to get houses. But I don't want to pay for them to go back to prison either. MKH as usual didn't offer any actual solution and neither did the other guests.
firegiver 4 years ago
So you're saying we should eat the homeless?
blogagog 4 years ago
lmao!!!
no not the homeless just the sexual preditors.
firegiver 4 years ago
It's always fascinating how anchors on CNN and other left wing media never attach the word "liberal" to their left-leaning guests, but ALWAYS introduce someone from the right as "conservative". Go to 4:23 of this clip and listen to Paula introduce the guests. This is quite common. Let's make darn sure we single out that damn "conservative" guest!!!!
brianscorp05 4 years ago 3
great observation :)
dafitzgerald 4 years ago 2
Why do they have a host from a racist channel like BET?
ScottfromTexas 4 years ago
People like HAM are the kind of people whose dangerous outlook on the situation, when adopted, cause new sex crimes rather than stopping them. Also, that 52% stat is a total lie. See angryoffender dot com and get the facts you need to protect children FOR REAL.
daivox 4 years ago
That's not fair! Ham didn't really get the last word! That man to the left of her stole the last word! I'm writing CNN!
morcoschris 4 years ago
Just as you can't help a mentally ill wacko like Cho in VT without committing him against his will (and violating his rights) you also can't protect a communities children from people who have proven they molest children. Under the present system, you have to turn them loose.
manofaiki 4 years ago
Study the redicisvism rate of sexual offenders. Our justice system does not know how to handle people of this type. The number of these people who victimize again is high, yet all we can do is stick them in prison for a bit, then turn them loose again, whereupon they go after fresh victims. This has been going on for years and people are getting upset about it.
manofaiki 4 years ago
I think anyone from Morocco should have to live under a bridge, and be fed nothing but collard greens.
WVDave26 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mary Kuntlike Hall is a fat ugly Cunt. I hope she gets the same kind of justice she is wanting for others, none. She is the lowest form of life. She has no redeeming qualities. She is everything that is vile about American women, and is an embarassment to the Human race. She is the lowest scum on the earth. Hope she gets stuck in an elevator with a real sex offender.
moroccanNproud 4 years ago
This is so stupid and hateful, it's almost comical.
KawaiiKohaku 4 years ago
Forcing anyone to live this way, to punish them TWICE for the same crime, and to guarantee their inability to successfully reintegrate into society is unconscionable, and unAmerican,
SmallPressFan 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mary Kuntathrine, the fat ugly whore who supports eliminating the constitution should be made to spend some time under the over pass. I think a cunt like her would enjoy it.
moroccanNproud 4 years ago
Hey, watch it okay. Even if you don't agree with what she stands for, have some respect and stop being suck an ignorant prick.
ambermcdonald 4 years ago
So first of all came the youngest Billy Goat Gruff to cross the bridge.
"Trip, trap, trip, trap!" went the bridge.
"Who's that tripping over my bridge?" roared the troll.
"Oh, it is only I, the tiniest Billy Goat Gruff, and I'm going up to the hillside to make myself fat," said the billy goat, with such a small voice.
"Now, I'm coming to gobble you up," said the troll.
ceer001 4 years ago
MKH is a heartless cunt!
eddieh82 4 years ago
sorry for my friend Steve's foul language, but this subject matter is near and dear to his heart given his "circumstance" I do however agree with him...just not his foul language and namecalling of people who disagree with him. However I do believe that she(MKH) has a very warped view on the issue(referring to sex offenders as animals and all). What ever happened to forgiving people who make mistakes and letting them try to rebuild their lives once they get out of prison?
eddieh82 4 years ago
Great job MKH. That must have been an honor to be a part of. Sex offenders need a life sentence in my opinion. The law does need to change when it pertains to high school students, like an 18 y/o sleeping with a 16 y/o.
Jake0007 4 years ago
I don't see why these people don't move to some rural area where they can live in proper housing and where there are no children around to molest. If it's because of probation rules, those should be flexible enough to solve this problem.
claytongault 4 years ago
MKH... you are such a cutie... sorry I know I should be deep or political or something about this... but I just can't help myself. :D
nuddkor 4 years ago
"If homeless life is what I have to look forward to, then I'm better off in jail."
People, can't we give them what they ask for?
blogagog 4 years ago
Well by that logic why not just give sex offenders a life sentence without parole on the first offense? And don't forget that includes a 17 year old having oral sex with a 15 year old (Genarlow Wilson got 10 years for that). If that's the severity of laws people want then fine, as long as the laws are applied equally to women sex offenders (yeah, like that'll EVER happen).
digitalhermit 4 years ago
The only reason not to do as you suggest is that innocent people might be judged guilty. Second offenses are a great deal less likely to be misdiagnosed, so I'm all for locking THEM up forever.
Your example is ridiculous and the law should be changed to ignore child-child relationships, and maybe even situations involving, say, 17 and 20 year olds. I don't find that sickening and reprehensible as I do child molestation.
blogagog 4 years ago
Child molesters - worse than murderers. Lock 'em up and toss the key.
blogagog 4 years ago
I feel exactly the same
dafitzgerald 4 years ago
I wonder if "conservative" Mary Katharine Ham's has any opinion on this clear violation of equal protection under law / human rights.
If you're a female sex offender (43 yr old molesting a 12 year old boy), you get jail time and then you can live with your former victim (Mary Kay Letourneau) - but if you're a 43 yr old male sex offender molesting a 12 year old girl you'll end up living under a bridge.
digitalhermit 4 years ago
This is just another sign of the increasingly poor treatment of male sex offenders who unlike armed robbery or murder convicts, continue to be cut off from society even after they've served their time. Strange that no women sex offenders appear to be subjected to this sort of housing discrimination. I doubt you'll ever see women sex offenders sleeping under a bridge being gnawed on by rats. Only men appear to be deserving of this dehumanized under-the-bridge "troll" treatment.
digitalhermit 4 years ago
Why you defending them,you a convicted sex offender?Being as these guys have the highest rate of offending again and the new offenses usually include murder,they should either lock them up for life or make it a capital offense and execute these unreformable subhuman predatory pieces of shit.
cherokee316 4 years ago
I'm asking the question why are female and male sex offenders treated unequally? Where is the female under-the-bridge living space? You want to execute offenders? That's brilliant, then let's start the executions with Mary Kay Letourneau.
digitalhermit 4 years ago
In the case of Mary Kay Letourneau even though it was messed up (him being 14 and her being married) it was consesual and should not even be compared to the cases for the likes of Couley in Florida and that lowlife that kidnapped Shasta and killed her mother,her mothers boyfriend,and molested and murdered her brother,now answer my question are you one?
cherokee316 4 years ago
No, I am not a sex offender but I do know someone who is currently mounting a legal defense against a false accusation of sex offenses (that's a whole other issue). And who is comparing cases? MKH is the one implicitly lumping all sex offenders into the "rape a 9 year old" category. So do you believe violent female sex offenders (which do exist) should be housed under bridges as well?
digitalhermit 4 years ago
They should get the same punishment as men,I also think the laws need a lot of work even though they'll never be perfect.I also think you need to find a better example than the Letourneau case.
cherokee316 4 years ago
You are wrong. Many studies show that sex offenders have the LOWEST recidivism rate, contrary to what the media and politicians with agenda's would have you believe, and I have many of those studies posted on my blog, with links to the original studies, done by the Department of Justice and other experts in the field.
SexOffenderIssues002 2 years ago
There is one woman who lives under this same bridge.
SexOffenderIssues002 2 years ago