I missed what you said the first 2 minutes of the vid trying to remember just exactly what 'mendacity' means...lol. I finally had to pause the vid and see a dictionary. It's not a word used very often, if at all, here in the states. My bet is that most of your viewers thought you meant, 'audacity', and took it at that meaning. Good vid..and good points about rape!
Male prisoners are raped more than all women in the same country??? THANK YOU!!!!!!!
I have been saying this for the longest, just based on sheer common sense! Now there are stats shown here to prove it. For the record (this even goes to REAL female rape victims): The decades long effects of a false rape allegation are FAR WORSE than a man stealing your pussy for 10 minutes!!! I'm not advocating or excusing females being raped with that statement. I'm just saying.
@RockingMrE (cont) Though I would add that real rape victims do have psychological damage of post-trauma to deal with, not to say that falsely accused victims don't have to endure mental suffering.
I was referred here from Barbarossaaaa's "Take Back The Night" video. I had only played 30 seconds of your video then paused it to glance at the links you had listed below it.
The titles of those links ALONE got me subscribed to your channel, I can already tell...you're a smart man!
Also, is there a chance that the radicals might have been guilded to win....i don't want to make this sound like a conspiracy theory but is there a chance governments might have intervened to making sure the radicals gained gained more influence and that the conservatives lost out and eventually would become overwritten?
@Dobogio Whether Feminists like it or not they served a purpose in increasing the tax base in the West after World War Two. When we look at the last 100 years Feminism has coincided with an increase in government across the board. Yet Feminists refuse to believe that their policies are entirely dependent on Socialism and other Economic Progressivism. Feminists are too blind, or willfully ignorant, to care about the negatives of what they have done.
@RockingMrE True, I remember seeing a chart that showed that when women entered the voting franchise their was a notable increase in government. Women tend to vote for the state, this has been historically proven since the start and is quite unfortunate.
In other words, did the early womens rights activist simply demand equal rights without equal responsibility and expectations that men were forced under...which in turn would make them no different then feminist today?
@Dobogio The first-wave was partitioned. It was made up of a conservative group and a radical group. If today is anything to go by the radicals won. Even many moderates by today's standards are radical compared to the suffragettes. The reason for this is because the political ideology for feminism transformed from liberalism to marxism and other leftist dogma. See my "A Brief History of Feminism" video for more.
@RockingMrE the origins video was brilliant, although I wonder on something. The intial conservative group must have has different aims then the radical group who eventually won. Was the conservatives aims only to attain the voting franchise and property rights and divorce rights?
If it was then that would mean this, if the conservatives won feminism would never had existed. Considering they worked with men it's likely both men and women would have worked together on a equal distribution...
@Dobogio Early feminists were interested in de facto rights, like voting and owning property; all valid issues in my opinion. However, by the second wave this transformed to de jeur rights, far more tirvial in most regards. This is is affiliated with a deep transformation in the movement, which coincided with a dominance by Radical Feminists. The Conservative feminists are still alive today, but they avoid the label - people like Christina Hoff Summers, Erin Pizzey, and of course Warren Farrell.
@RockingMrE I personally always thought that women would eventually have been allowed to vote and own property. At the rate society was progressing with technology, it seems like a logical deduction to suggest this would have developed organically as technological continued to improve. Although i do have a issue with these early conservative women....the voting franchise and right to own property was directly correlated with conscription and hard manual labor. It is a fair statement to suggest..
@Dobogio Perhaps they did when you think about it. Men had more rights because they had more obligations. None of this really clicked into the philosophy of feminism, though I think that Conservative feminists understood this.
"However, by the second wave this transformed to de jeur rights, far more tirvial in most regards. This is is affiliated with a deep transformation in the movement, which coincided with a dominance by Radical Feminists."
-----
You got that right!
How many people like Hillary and Gloria Steinem speak out against the radical Islamist groups, Shariah (law) in Afghanistan; Saudi Arabia, etc.?
None of them will go to bat (figure of speech) for stay-at-home-moms
I wanted to pick your brain over something rockingM, in your opinion would you say the early women rights activist from the late 1800 century were equally as self serving and delusional as feminist today. I reason this because those women were trying to secure to same "rights"men had at that point in society...but from my understanding wasn't there usually a expectation in the way of subscription or cheap labor men had to perform in order to attain those rights?
@RockingMrE - I'm sure they do. I guess I don't fall into the feminist category. I understand and accept that there are things that men can do that I will not be able to do as well or even at all. I don't take offense either. I embrace my feminine qualities and love that women and med are different :) but I don't fault anyone for not choosing to adhere to a predefined gender role. I just don't agree with forcing "equality" at the point of a gun. It achieves the opposite of what is intended.
@guydecervens Cheers. The one with the men getting hit on the trains in India is pretty shocking. There are so many poeple that really buy into this women as inherent victims claptrap, and it really hurts the idea that men can be victims at all.
I was watching a commercial for a popular cop show here in the US and one of the characters says, ' Female rage is a growth industry ' Evidently so judging from all shows, books, magazines, etc. Emotionalism (emotional 'truth' over reason) in general in this country is rampant in practically every aspect of life. Emotion driven movements usually die out or self destruct. The trick is not getting pulled down with them when they do. Easier said than done granted ; )
@acuriousbeast The stats for rape are actually declining, much to the frustration of some anti-rape organisations. Rape is a delicate subject, and until we learn how to deal with it sensitively on both sides of the equation (accuser and accused) it will result in even more damage. I would never deny that rape exists, but all the impartial evidence I have seen doesn't go anywhere near 1 in 3, or even 1 in 4.
@RockingMrE M-F Rape is not something feminists want to fix. Two reasons; 1) Reducing it to a rarity deprives them of a useful 'guilt' card to use on men and a topic for provoking unthinking high emotion in females. 2) identifying the cause of rapist behavior in men (almost always traceable to abuse from a female while the male is in childhood) would cause them to have to take a more realistic view of women (and thus themselves) that contradicts the current 'victim/goddess' one they have now.
@acuriousbeast Completely agree with you. However, you will get into trouble if you speak like that - the liberal saviours of society will not stand for the idea that women are anything but victims. Heaven forbid that they are only human, like men :-D
@RockingMrE Usually a theatrical finger snap and a 'I don't think so Miss Thing' buys me enough time to get to the door. There's a quote from one of the Bronte sisters that pontificating feminists always bring to mind; (paraphrase) 'It was bad enough to find all mankind hollow, servile, insincere but worse to trust to my own heart and find the same corruption there.' I think it was Charlotte. They hate that one. Telling in a way, I wonder what they fear to see? : D
@RockingMrE One time I got into a face to face debate with 2 feminist & won,it was about the so called wage gap,after words they just gave me dirty looks along with giving off vibes. Of being wounded,its as if I popped a bubble of one of they're cherished belief's & forever changed how they see the world! The facts alone will not win this gender war,but it will win some hearts & minds on the way to victory.
@RockingMrE Lucky for me I wasn't dealing with hardcore feminist,just misguided women & I don't think they conceaded they had nothing to fire back with after I dropped that info bomb. On they're heads,they couldn't cling to they're dogma after my pepper bombing of logic!
I took a break from the MRM because of all the inevitable negativity. I come back and low and behold, the sexist feminists are still at it.
Oh w8, my fault, i forgot to take into account the distinction between different types of feminists. What I meant to say was that the sexist sex+ feminists are still at it. Sorry feminists.
indeed dv is a tool to falsify public opinions, to make socioses, to make transgenerational collective cognitive dissonances, the making of hardworking-obeying feminized homophile shitizens, though concerning destroying normal families (thus most of the time children&fathers!) dv-vawa is only a small and minor part, there are 'men' promoting 'save' but realize that fathermovement and also radar is infiltrated with femini$Sm-samesex ..
@RedLanternXY "We need to invest in reproductive technology and find a way to reproduce without women. We don't need them anymore, and I say fuck them"
So, how do we make All Men in Western Society aware of these problems cause by 45 years of "Feminist" Domestic Violence Industry Evil Indoctrination that is now Indoctrinated into Politics, the Government, Courts, Police and General Public, that:
- Women are Good, Men are Bad!
- Women are helpless Victims, Men are Perpetrators!
- Women need Help and Protection, Men must be Restrained, Prosecuted and Jailed! ?
Thanks for the Videos you have made on False Accusations of Men by Women inspired by the Feminist Domestic Violence Industry Propaganda of Lies and Lobby and Joe Biden's Violence Against Women Act - VAWA - A Misandric and Unconstitutional Legislation that Grants $1 Billion a year - Every Dollar of which used to Destroy the Traditional Family as well as the Civilized Society we used to have.
More videos on how we will defeat this venom will be greatly appreciated !
@PutaDeInmigraVAWA "Feminism is Probably the Most Destructive movement for Society today." EXACTLY !!! projecting own weaknesses on others is also a very important point !
Thanks ! Yes... Claiming the Victim Status leads to "Victim Mentality" which leads to "Fight or Flight" response or in other words: Indecriminatory attacks (against the Male gender), attack to destroy...
Feminism is cuasing the Destruction of Men, Boys, Fathers, Families and Society.
This proves that We, Men, cannot EVER let Women handle important matters such as Law-making, Policy-making, Society matters and Morals.
@mike61524334251 Nah, George Carlin is ok to a large extent. It's just a little shortsighted to blame everything on men without seeing what women have done in the background, not to mention the desperation for men to pander to women.
different relgions,counties and cultures. Socialization encourages our biology or at least it used to because its what was best for the species. However soecialization on its own can never created gender....feminisnt have tried to socialize women into men and vice versa and even after 50 years the best they could do is create a counterfeit version of both.
@Dobogio You've given an explanation that clearly shows how biology is the biggest explanation for male and female roles in history, though feminism will tell you otherwise. Cheers for your comment :-)
A comment was made awhile back that stated that rock should also acknowledge that some aspects of our gender are socially constructed...well heres the thing about that. Social gender constructs are created to passively enforce our biological tendecies since its in our bilogical tendecies that the suruvial of the species will continue through. Socialization doesnt create it simply enfoces, this is preciesly why men and women have shared the same division of labor throught history through many...
Awesome video. Thanks for the useful comparison of a man's cost of public accusation of rape, falsely or justly, is of a costly comparable to the act of rape.
@feministsAreCorrupt Cheers. Rape anonymity should work both ways until a case is resolved. It will make the false accusation of rape a less dangerous tool.
A few years ago, I read a study about infanticide and pedophilia. It explained that women are more likely to abuse and kill children than men (that's a BIG taboo)... and are also more likely to use violence if the kid is a little boy (supposed to be stubborn and too agitated). There is also a lot of informations about this topic in the free book from freedomain radio "the origin of war in child abuse".
@EuropaPhoenix infanticide I believe occurs higher in male children for example than female children and the State protect this figure from being made public and denies it. Infanticide is a law which states as long as the child is under 1yrs old it can be killed by its mother and it will not be treated as murder- I have studied this a lot myself. Female Pedophilia is related to a Lilith complex in my view as having authority over men- both conditions stem out of the same complex to kill the man.
@EuropaPhoenix I am hearing more and more about the reality of women as abusers. It is something I am going to look into more. It needs to be heard because it is the job of people like me to make sure the full picture is provided. If you find that study the feel free to send it on to me. I am slowly getting through "the origins of war" on freedomainradio".
@RedLanternXY Let's start on the basis of accepting that there were no winners and losers in history when it comes to the sexes. From here we can adapt our roles in society since modern innovation allows us to do so. Men and women reporducing naturally and happily coexisting is essential to the future of mankind - without this we will walk into a Huxlian nightmare.
What they have bigger dicks? Bomb them! And of course the bombs, the bullets, and rockets are all shaped like dicks. I don't understand the part of it, but it is part of the occasion.
@mike61524334251 It does sound weird. Once again we have a man who should know better and simply can't connect the dots to see that women are what men strive to impress above all. It would all be for nothing to men if they didn't have women - and women love to play on that power. History tells us that many powerful men had a woman behind them pulling the strings.
Because they are afraid that someone else has a bigger dick out there somewhere. Men are basically insecure about the size of their dicks so they go to war over it, you don't have to be a political scientist or a history major to see the bigger dick foreign theory at work, it goes something like this (continued).
According to the late comedian George Carlin, in January 1990, where he talked about feminists groups especially he had said: I've got nothing against the feminists, I happened to agree with most the philosophies the feminists I have read, I agree with the most part, men are vain, ignorant, greedy, brutal assholes who are about to ruin this planet. (Continued)
I've been thinking for a while that more stats and information gathering, can only have a limited impact on 'The Problem'. That's because The Problem is not one borne of simple ignorance, it's born of WILLFUL ignorance. And that doesn't go away just because it's proved wrong.
It shouldn't boggle you that so many swallow the "1-in-3-women" inventions. These same people would also accept that it was actually 5-in-4 women that suffered some kind of abuse. Sadly, misandry trumps logic.
@manwomanmyth I've been thinking the same sort of thing. Where does it end? The person who mentioned the 1 in 3 stat on his vid says he stands for "equality and individuality for all". Alas, I think the only thing we can truly say when we look at history is that agreeing with the majority is when one needs to ask themselves whether it's time to change. Thanks for your view and comments - it's very much appreciated.
@manwomanmyth You can say that also about racism in that you do not see racist's disappear because of introduced laws regarding Hate crimes and discrimination. The social injustices will be recognised if MRA's keep plugging away at it and making the arguments more scientific.That is how feminism got a strangle-hold in the first place by the sheer amount of psychologists, and Statists that agreed with the ideology and submitted papers. Its the genesis that we have to tare down that is the problem
@apekillssnake Ah, but racism didn't suit the state, misandry does. Also, I don't want more laws, I want fewer.
The '1-in-4' crowd i.e. most people, don't think about what such a stat means. If they did, even for a minute, they'd see how impossible it is. '1-in-4' is not used as a stat, it's used as a mantra.
Feminism didn't advance due to junk-science. It was state mandate, capitalising on ignorance, emotion and prejudice. Even if we tackle ignorance, the other two issues remain.
@manwomanmyth What if laws introduced by MRA campaigns remove other laws, you get what you want then. I agree with you that Misandry having studied it for a very long time psychologically is far more a memetic that racism is, it is far more insular(see insular cortex)and unintuitive. Mens abuse- to break the condition is going to be the hardest fight that mankind will ever face, it has genome and evolutionary evidence attached to it, this is why its can operate shibboleths. Part two to follow..
@manwomanmyth feminism advanced due to the fact the junk-science it used was bought without question.Firstly Misandry is as old as man has been parented. State mandate is authorized because state persons are reared by Matriarchical Paternalism which is misandric, if you really study psycho-analysis,it has a kill-the-man sydrome also. Both had the other ones complex reinforced.Female insula cortex has created this infallible system, you see this by truly studing family law or feminist linguistics
@apekillssnake "What if laws introduced by MRA campaigns remove other laws, you get what you want then." lol. Agreed!
"To break the condition is going to be the hardest fight that mankind will ever face". Also agreed. Further, I think that it's a fight that will be carried out by the few and not the many. If it's accomplished at all, then the great work will be done by handfuls of men, not armies of men, simply because the armies don't exist, and are not likely to.
@manwomanmyth Very much agreed.. it is however like training an army, men on Youtube do need to be given the evidence by the handful or few as they would be taught to fire a gun. Because man is the workhorse of society we do have a smart/dumb divide in the Mens Movement- the bottom rungs vent by sounded off and coming over as Misogynists because of a science reason for their frustrations. I constantly wish more intellectuals would come look at the evidence because it yields so much new science.
@manwomanmyth Misandry may suit the state in the short term. But in the longer term, making the most productive half of the population scapegoats, is a colossal blunder that may end up collapsing our civilisation in due course. Scapegoats have traditionally been minority groups or 'others', who could be persecuted without threat to the foundations of that society.
If you haven't read it, "Old hate, new victims" on the menaregood blog is worth a read for the parallels between racism and misandry.
@dalriada842 I hear you, but whilst the 'misandry bubble' type perspective is all well and good, keep in mind that there are more people interested in Elvis Presley memorabilia, than have ever even HEARD of this strange issue called "men's rights".
The more compelling reality that I see, is that men won't allow such a bubble to burst, no matter what the cost to themselves. Irony probably doesn't get more awful than that.
@manwomanmyth That's a depressing thought! I have to say that when I raise these issues at work, amongst the casual sexism from the women, they also seem to be more receptive to the message than the men. Of course they may just be humouring me, instead of ignoring me like the men! I probably seem like a demented loony to them all. :(
@manwomanmyth fair point, but empirical integrity can only serve men better. One in three women may not be assaulted, but men should be able to say how many were assaulted over what period of time and to what degree this is inconsistent with feminist approved numbers if they ever find themselves in that conversation. Even if its just a conversation with other men.
@manicbranic Well, you're right that that we should have the facts. I just think that the facts have barely anything at all to do with the main battle. Which is a shame, of course, because if they were important, there wouldn't BE any battle.
@manwomanmyth There are no facts or figures to be had- I have looked for them. The institutions are being obstructive because they do not want society to know the truth. Just look at how politicans argue over different statistics etc... When Anti-MRA groups on YT have used this statement, I have sat back an laughed. You will not get stats as the police and courts do not keep records- this is why the administrative courts must be forced into public inquiry. A brand new social paradigm must come.
@manwomanmyth Take for example when a NMO is made- a Non-molestation order, you will not find how many are made on women or men because it is all men and they do not want the real evidence to come out.For example what most men dont know is that when this is performed- three of these are duplicated the courts hold 1 The police the other and the final one goes to a central data base system or MI5,Men dont know this, how its all being made into a confluence with other laws as a police state on them
I know you'll claim that all feminists more or less subscribe to your depiction of the movement, but you seem to be describing only the man-hating radical feminists. They do play the "oppression" card and rant about alleged "rape culture". I agree that there is a tendency for feminists to claim that all gender differences are "socially constructed". But you're making the same misteke that they make by failing to distinguish between biological & socially constructed differences.
@prschuster To continue, women will never be as likely to compete as easily as men in physically aggressive careers like the military or police work, but they will always have an advantage in dealing with small children. These are biological differences which have few exceptions. But most occupations are socially constructed and don't favor either sex, like medicine, business or law. The women's movement has at least opened doors in those areas. It's the rad fems that hi-jacked feminism.
@prschuster Thanks for your points. You make some interesting comments. Word of warning however, I have repeatedly had it proven to me that ALL feminists are delusional, and often liars, that will do anything to perpetuate their myths. They rant about the same old hyperbole involving rape, domestic abuse, pay gaps et al - it never ends. Feminism is a philosophy rotten to its core I'm afraid. Look at Laci Green as an example - they all succumb to the lies in the end because they love the crusade.
I dont have to check out stats, figures and studies regarding female violence etc. Ive lived a long time now and know through personal experience that women are and can be violent etc. Most of any category you wish to choose on DV I can tell you I have experienced and many many men and boys, women and girls can say the same. It starts in the home and its usually if not always from Mother! Thats where people learn violence first. Thanks again for a reminder of truth MrE.
@tatiebogle All I ask is that we stop making violence a gender issue. The truth is far more nuanced than that. Women are perfectly cpapable of violence. While women are not as directly violent as men they can be incredibly cruel and manipulative - which is a terrible concoction when it comes to abusing children, as well as spousal abuse.
@RockingMrE MrE I agree with all you are saying. But in my experience as a child and adult I have experienced direct physical violence from women. They are well capable of direct violence . Given a chance and armed with the assurance that they are generally immune from prosecution or blame they will unleash their fury. This feminist gender issue as you say clouds the truth of DV and child abuse with the corruption of truth and in many cases justice and vindication for victim and false accused.
@tatiebogle I am not saying that women are incapable of direct violence - far from it. But criminal profiling often tells us that women can be motivated by cruelty and manipulation. Women CAN use direct violence when they have a broken or subservient victim, but they will also use equalisers like a weapon, object, or drugs to even the playing field.
Good point. I recall that black lady on a lecture tour at college discussing racism. She snuck around and vandalized her own car with words like "nigger" and "bitch." She was finally found out. What a disgrace!
People should never forget the Duke Lacrosse rape case. False charges led to the end of the entire lacrosse team and season. A top four team! Then the New Black Panthers marched through town demanding justice. Justice is jailing the lying black bitch, you stupid Panther racist pukes!
@DexterHaven49 While I can sense your frustration I ask that you don't use racial words like "black" combined with insults on my channel. I have no desire to be dragged into this sort of rhetoric.
once again brilliant video!! I think their thinking of rape is disgusting. "if you regret sex the morning after then it's rape" or "if you have sex without a condom then the woman regrets it, then it's rape." Feminism is disgusting and has a hold over society, many people cannot see it but those of us with crystal vision can see it very clearly.
@BmovieBaby There is not only a cultural societal wall to break down, there is also a biological one. Men are programmed to feel that women are "good", while sacrificing themselves to the altar of male disposability.
RockingMrE does a fine job, again, of breaking the stereotypical women only suffer rape and domestic violence lie we all are fed. I know a man that was raped, by another man. Pulled out in a parking garage late at night. There was zero support for him. We lost touch over the years and this was the trigger. I only hope he is still alive and well. Good Job RockingMrE. Well done.
@1godthor Male rape is seriously underreported, though where to begin when it comes to women violating men sexually. It is simply too much of a taboo at the moment. Society is not ready for the truth. Cheers for your support :-)
Thank you for this. I've been having discussions with one guy who claims to be both a feminist and an MRA who insists that other MRAs don't need to attack feminism in order to address men's issues. We need more videos like these.
@TheLordmep Be very careful of those who claim to understand men's issues while being sympathetic of feminism. I have yet to find one person who fits this profile who is not a wolf in sheep's clothing. Feminism needs to be attacked because it declared war on men long before men like us woke up.
Cultural marxism has so many destructive tenticles by which it tries to destroy noble integrity of a folk body,and the fact that these tenticles are push by minority group campaigners(i am not talking about races here btw);that some of these groups under the collective umbrella of cultural marxism actually contradict eachothers efforts .Typically the pro porn and degeneracy vs the feminist anti-sex symbolisation of women etc.Two cheeks working against eachother for the good of the same arsehole.
Another factor to think about which i won't divert from the topic too much is interacial crime rates of which rape is a common denominator.Advocates of feminism and the eternal "woman victim status" who are also part of the operating mechanics of cultural marxism;I just wonder what they have to say on that aspect,and whether their crusade is the same on those grounds or whether it is conveniently bypassed because it suits(or doesn't suit)their overal agenda(concern for women or family fragmented
I remember a woman being austed from her own established organisation(it was a womans refuge of some sort)by feminists who hijacked her endevours to help genuine women because she once suggested that certain women were "serial victims"...
In this the "serial victims" were stealing the resources away from those who needed help who were likely to recover and find a better permanent stability.
Feminists were wasting time with their "all women are victims" mentality.
If women could only see that they are becoming the knuckle dragging, sex offender, spousal abusers that men used to be. Likewise, GOV is setting them up for an even bigger fall by the Babies 4 Bank, Kids 4 Cash and Body for Booty schemes. But let them swim in their river of denial and when the GOV drops them like a women does to an unwanted man remind them that men tried to help them see they were wrong.
@usmcoth Sorry my man, but you cant use that gender stereotype against men perpetuated by Feminists. The arch you are referring to is a myth, men have always been protective of women with few incidents of provocation where that imagery has been exploited by non-examination of her, or too far small actual figure of criminal males who do pose to have a problem with Domestic Violence i.e. actual males come in have excellent wife, but his dinner is cold on the plate so he sends her to the hospital.
@apekillssnake - lost in translation. I was not bashing men and support your evidence and concepts. I too speak out against the Feminazi approach to men today. Women said they wanted equality but now hate their jobs. They wanted independence and yet they are more dependent. Babies 4 Bank, Kids 4 Cash and Body for Booty schemes have turned nearly 100% of women into nothing more than prostitutes. AChildsRight org is where I have spoke my peace on the subject.
@usmcoth Yes I know, I think you were making a very important observation, however it fell foul of a gender stereotype that we have all been programmed by. There is lots of study to be done here just on that one point. We have all been duped by females psyche that this is how things used to be- men being chauvinistic pigs.However MrE made an excellent point at the beginning of his upload that this is just about evolution or a meritocracy for hundred of thousands of years only now being violated
@apekillssnake - I also speak out about how dramatic a change in such a short period of time that women have turned into the knuckle dragging, spouse beating, child molesting leaders of the world. I suspect that Pharma has poisoned their birth control to effect such a large audience so easily.
I think feminism should be disassociated from women - period. I hate feminists as much as guys do but still get racked in with those stupid b... because I lack a penis :P
@chocoboasylum Believe me there are women who feel like you do - they are waking up all the time. Check out girlwriteswhat on my other channel's section.
@chocoboasylum I (and many other MRA's) agree, and make concerted efforts to do just that, remembering that feminism is an ideology consisting of both men and woman, but not consisting of all women. However it is difficult to disassociate women and feminism when any criticism of feminism results in accusations of "misogyny" (AKA the hatred of women). Feminists maintain a connection by claiming that feminism and woman are synonymous.
@chocoboasylum There is a necessary dignity that women can find in feminism,sadly though "femassholeism" blights the fight for womens rights.
There are a large number of women determined to sabotage positive activism because they don't want a level playing field.They want to keep operating under the watch of the patriarch.
They wish to be underdogs under the care of "big daddy" not big brother.
It's a good way to keep other intelligent,independent,women down.
I think the MRM needs to grow and for it to define its own study and definition of the word Domestic Violence. DV needs to become as socially repulsive as the word feminism is- because largely it is a disorder of the mind leading to false accusation, than being real. MRA's need to come together and find an appropriate label and in a legal sense campaign for what that definition IS, as with many other labels. DV needs to be put back in its box so to speak as does Feminism. I'll comment more later
Ah my favorite subject of study- Female on-male violence! Big Subject BIG SUBJECT. Just to add into the debate I dont actually think that Domestic Violence on men should be recognised under that heading. DV admittance by men is actually a way to further emasculate men psychologically inside the same syndrome against men that fails to recognise Male DV in the first place. Like the word Bullied traps or reinforces the victim that way, part of the condition is being reinforced. Im adamant about ...
@apekillssnake Personally I think the admittance that domestic violence is gender blind is a result. The truth is now emerging that, while men and women are different in their approaches to violence, that women and men are both equally capable of abuse. Once violence is no longer used as a political weapon then this will be a result in itself.
@RockingMrE To be clear I'm not saying men should not admitt to DV if they are responsible, and I think also a lot more changes inside the system needs to happen regarding the examination of that. Im saying that once they are channeled by the label Domestic Violence on men they are infact further being abused. I think speaking from the position of someone who has really studied DV by the courts and helped dads in those cases, that it is far far darker than most can imagine, to a remit by most.
@apekillssnake So, I'm seeing you say that male victims of abuse should not be identified as such, but I don't see a proposed solution... Am I missing something? Because without a proposed solution, all your doing is trying to hide/bury these men under more shame, by making the claim to victim even more shameful than it already is.
@MNeilGri I did offer a title being "female on-male violence", but I put it to a consensus if the MRM could come up with a more definitive term that ensured no victimology. That is the very point I am making. I would have to put forwards a thesis on this and I hate writting in the small comments section on anything serious. I treat it as a debate section and expect other MRA's to already be on a par with what I am saying.Lets see if it gets debated or I will write something up and send it to you
@RockingMrE I agree with your points of it being used as a political weapon used against the personal by Statists. However the reality is that women generate DV and not the other way around. Take for example the DailyMail report Yesturday by Nick Clegg, that is to mask by newly introduced policy from the system internally the evidence or rate at which women abuse men- by saying controlling is to excuse females hitting- for them to say I hit him coz he controlled me- as is DV murder excuse used.
@RockingMrE If you also look across from this comments bar you will see a female face on the manwomanmyth-comestic violence- the. These person is responsibile inside the system of performing a profiling system on men- of each personality type that uses DV that affectively is impossible for any innocent male to not be typecase by. As proof of the abuse of DV inside the system, no such profiling system exists for women who perpetuate Domestic Abuse by the insular region of the brain. NO TIME TODAY
50 years is certainly a long and debilitating time. Bezmenyov said in that KGB vid that it's 2 generations needed in terms to wash out the education factor in brainwashing.
@pinegrove33 Yeah I remember Bezmenyov saying that. We're not dealing with rational people anymore. They are truly brainwashed beyond repair in most cases. They have to be frozen out of the process and exposed for what they are. Failing that people have to be angry enough to stand up and say "no more". There is no other choice except total assimilation by these leftists.
@lashkaretoiba Yeah, she is clueless. She obviously thinks that because she quotes that 1 in 15 men are victims of domestic abuse, along with the rest of her hyperbole, that she is an egalitarian.
@RockingMrE How benevolently egalitarian of her, indeed. I'm telling you, man, when she busted out the glenn beck-esque crazy diagram on the chalk board that was it for me. I lost it.
@pinegrove33 Rough night huh Uncle Bern? Got another leftist response over the weekend about last week's vid. These whackos just keep making these pathetic videos relentlessly - it's just all ad hom nonsense. I'll leave it here for the amusement of those who care to see how nuts these people are:
/watch?v=XZfPRJb927M
If you can believe it people are actually celebrating Karl Marx winning "best philosopher" in the comment's section.
@RockingMrE nah, i seem to rotate between 6 to 8 hours of sleep. I simply can't get 8 hours two nights in a row. OK, i'll watch that but i always try to watch yours twice too.
@pinegrove33 Don't bother watching ALL of that idiot's vid. I doubt you will have the stomach for it. I got to just over 5 mins before I could stand no more.
@RockingMrE I watched it all. You didn't miss anything, it was just more of the same profanity and insults! He's the chuckle head! Loved this video BTW.
@dalriada842 I fail to see what the point is replying to these clowns - they are either deluded or desperate for attention - most likely both. It's a waste of time and energy even bothering to deconstruct the fallacious arguments that they put in my mouth - they would only invent more.
@pinegrove33 They are desperate. Seriously Bern - the leftists on YT are repeatedly on my back now. They hate their ideology being exposed for the hateful lie that it is. Braindead and weak-minded is what they are. They actually believe they are humanists, but nothing could be further from the truth.
Yep. They can't respond to arguments because they don't have any. They just try to distort and hide the truth. Like you always point out leftists are emotional - it is their biggest weapon, but I don't accept their guilt tactics.
@RockingMrE One more thing Bern. I left a few interesting vids in the info section that may interest you. One shows men getting hit on the trains in India - it's a terrible sight.
In terms of the early women rights movement, I heard it had something to do with the government wanting female voters due to female sbeing easy to control and as such easy voters. I dont know enough regarding this matter at length but does sound like something you have come across?
@Dobogio One thing that is certain about female voting patterns today is that they do generally treat the state like a substitute husband. So they vote for bigger government as a rule. Thus female independence is an illusion under the present system - few woman actually walk the walk, as well as talk it.
@RockingMrE Thats the one aspect about feminism that feminist never acknowledge(amongst other things). The state is essentially the new husband, it provides,supports and protects women except instead of being a loving husband who legitimately cares about them it is instead a body of complete strangers looking to gain as much profit as possible. On the note of voters, I believe their was some research done away ago that proved the government"involvement"becamse far more...
@RockingMrE imposing after the female vote was granted. It seems women are more prone to the state...perhaps the social evolutionary biology of women predisposes them to innately follow under a provider/protector. It doesnt get much better in those 2 aspects then the government as we all know.
@Dobogio I think there is ample evidence to show that women are predisposed to follow a provider/protector, though feminists desperately try to suggest that it was male oppression that caused this - all lies of course given that there is plenty of proof to the contrary.
Something important we should note, surrounding all the hype promoted especially in Sweden, is it so confuses their society that Sweden is more easily lulled into joining the EU, where a privately owned central bank prints the euros and lends it to member govts as they go deeper into debt.
We should find out where these militant feminazi groups are getting their funding. I wouldn't be surprised if the money trail leads right to those very same POCBs (privately owned central banks).
@RockingMrE Very true, the rockafeller foundation and many other extremely wealthy groups have finacially sponsored and in a sense been the sugar daddies of the feminist movemnt. I even heard a rumor that Ms.Magazine was run by the CIA...in fact Ive heard a lot of the rumors over how sponsored 2nd wave feminism was by the government.
I missed what you said the first 2 minutes of the vid trying to remember just exactly what 'mendacity' means...lol. I finally had to pause the vid and see a dictionary. It's not a word used very often, if at all, here in the states. My bet is that most of your viewers thought you meant, 'audacity', and took it at that meaning. Good vid..and good points about rape!
SirFrancisDashwood15 1 month ago in playlist Men's Issues 3
@SirFrancisDashwood15 Thanks. Mendacity was a word I chose mainly because I thought it sounded so good in the title :-D
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@TUTrescue Yeah, but they'll around & show TV ads with a man trying to operate a powertool & spinning out of control, breaking everything.
These ads expose women's natural insecurities. Last time I checked, I never saw a woman build a house, a deck, a bridge, a cabinet, etc
...ALL OF WHICH REQUIRE POWER TOOLS THAT CAN KILL or MAIM YOU IF NOT USED CORRECTLY.
The next time U see these ads, picture the opposite of every thing U see, then U will see why they R so intimidated by MEN.
rexx1234567 1 month ago
@RockingMrE
Male prisoners are raped more than all women in the same country??? THANK YOU!!!!!!!
I have been saying this for the longest, just based on sheer common sense! Now there are stats shown here to prove it. For the record (this even goes to REAL female rape victims): The decades long effects of a false rape allegation are FAR WORSE than a man stealing your pussy for 10 minutes!!! I'm not advocating or excusing females being raped with that statement. I'm just saying.
THANK YOU!!!
rexx1234567 1 month ago
@rexx1234567 It's a fair point to state that the prolonged agony of having your life ruined by false rape is a longer experience than rape itself.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE (cont) Though I would add that real rape victims do have psychological damage of post-trauma to deal with, not to say that falsely accused victims don't have to endure mental suffering.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
I was referred here from Barbarossaaaa's "Take Back The Night" video. I had only played 30 seconds of your video then paused it to glance at the links you had listed below it.
The titles of those links ALONE got me subscribed to your channel, I can already tell...you're a smart man!
rexx1234567 1 month ago
@rexx1234567 Thanks for the compliment. Glad to have you onboard.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
Also, is there a chance that the radicals might have been guilded to win....i don't want to make this sound like a conspiracy theory but is there a chance governments might have intervened to making sure the radicals gained gained more influence and that the conservatives lost out and eventually would become overwritten?
Dobogio 1 month ago
@Dobogio Whether Feminists like it or not they served a purpose in increasing the tax base in the West after World War Two. When we look at the last 100 years Feminism has coincided with an increase in government across the board. Yet Feminists refuse to believe that their policies are entirely dependent on Socialism and other Economic Progressivism. Feminists are too blind, or willfully ignorant, to care about the negatives of what they have done.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE True, I remember seeing a chart that showed that when women entered the voting franchise their was a notable increase in government. Women tend to vote for the state, this has been historically proven since the start and is quite unfortunate.
Dobogio 1 month ago
@RockingMrE SO western capitalism is socialism?
brownie1982ad 1 month ago
@brownie1982ad Western capitalism is really crony capitalism, driven by planned economical policies like progressivism and keynesianism.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
In other words, did the early womens rights activist simply demand equal rights without equal responsibility and expectations that men were forced under...which in turn would make them no different then feminist today?
Dobogio 1 month ago
@Dobogio The first-wave was partitioned. It was made up of a conservative group and a radical group. If today is anything to go by the radicals won. Even many moderates by today's standards are radical compared to the suffragettes. The reason for this is because the political ideology for feminism transformed from liberalism to marxism and other leftist dogma. See my "A Brief History of Feminism" video for more.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE the origins video was brilliant, although I wonder on something. The intial conservative group must have has different aims then the radical group who eventually won. Was the conservatives aims only to attain the voting franchise and property rights and divorce rights?
If it was then that would mean this, if the conservatives won feminism would never had existed. Considering they worked with men it's likely both men and women would have worked together on a equal distribution...
Dobogio 1 month ago
@Dobogio Early feminists were interested in de facto rights, like voting and owning property; all valid issues in my opinion. However, by the second wave this transformed to de jeur rights, far more tirvial in most regards. This is is affiliated with a deep transformation in the movement, which coincided with a dominance by Radical Feminists. The Conservative feminists are still alive today, but they avoid the label - people like Christina Hoff Summers, Erin Pizzey, and of course Warren Farrell.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE I personally always thought that women would eventually have been allowed to vote and own property. At the rate society was progressing with technology, it seems like a logical deduction to suggest this would have developed organically as technological continued to improve. Although i do have a issue with these early conservative women....the voting franchise and right to own property was directly correlated with conscription and hard manual labor. It is a fair statement to suggest..
Dobogio 1 month ago
@RockingMrE that these early women ALSO wanted benefits without obligations?
Dobogio 1 month ago
@Dobogio Perhaps they did when you think about it. Men had more rights because they had more obligations. None of this really clicked into the philosophy of feminism, though I think that Conservative feminists understood this.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RockingMrE
"However, by the second wave this transformed to de jeur rights, far more tirvial in most regards. This is is affiliated with a deep transformation in the movement, which coincided with a dominance by Radical Feminists."
-----
You got that right!
How many people like Hillary and Gloria Steinem speak out against the radical Islamist groups, Shariah (law) in Afghanistan; Saudi Arabia, etc.?
None of them will go to bat (figure of speech) for stay-at-home-moms
BoudiccaBlanc 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I wanted to pick your brain over something rockingM, in your opinion would you say the early women rights activist from the late 1800 century were equally as self serving and delusional as feminist today. I reason this because those women were trying to secure to same "rights"men had at that point in society...but from my understanding wasn't there usually a expectation in the way of subscription or cheap labor men had to perform in order to attain those rights?
Dobogio 1 month ago
I wonder how feminist feel about the fact that their whole movement was constructed and funded as a way to expand the tax base?
AMY66354 1 month ago in playlist Men's Issues & Feminism
@AMY66354 I've mentioned it in vids and blogs previously. When Feminists hear this they resist it vehemently. They call it a conspiracy.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE - I'm sure they do. I guess I don't fall into the feminist category. I understand and accept that there are things that men can do that I will not be able to do as well or even at all. I don't take offense either. I embrace my feminine qualities and love that women and med are different :) but I don't fault anyone for not choosing to adhere to a predefined gender role. I just don't agree with forcing "equality" at the point of a gun. It achieves the opposite of what is intended.
AMY66354 1 month ago
@AMY66354 Good philosophy. We need more women like you to speak up.
RockingMrE 1 month ago
@RockingMrE - I do speak up...quite a bit and believe me I get every bit as much grief as you do and then some LOL.
AMY66354 1 month ago
@AMY66354 No surprise there then :-D
RockingMrE 1 month ago
Good links. Thanks
guydecervens 2 months ago in playlist Men's Rights Videos
@guydecervens Cheers. The one with the men getting hit on the trains in India is pretty shocking. There are so many poeple that really buy into this women as inherent victims claptrap, and it really hurts the idea that men can be victims at all.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
I was watching a commercial for a popular cop show here in the US and one of the characters says, ' Female rage is a growth industry ' Evidently so judging from all shows, books, magazines, etc. Emotionalism (emotional 'truth' over reason) in general in this country is rampant in practically every aspect of life. Emotion driven movements usually die out or self destruct. The trick is not getting pulled down with them when they do. Easier said than done granted ; )
acuriousbeast 2 months ago
@acuriousbeast The stats for rape are actually declining, much to the frustration of some anti-rape organisations. Rape is a delicate subject, and until we learn how to deal with it sensitively on both sides of the equation (accuser and accused) it will result in even more damage. I would never deny that rape exists, but all the impartial evidence I have seen doesn't go anywhere near 1 in 3, or even 1 in 4.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE M-F Rape is not something feminists want to fix. Two reasons; 1) Reducing it to a rarity deprives them of a useful 'guilt' card to use on men and a topic for provoking unthinking high emotion in females. 2) identifying the cause of rapist behavior in men (almost always traceable to abuse from a female while the male is in childhood) would cause them to have to take a more realistic view of women (and thus themselves) that contradicts the current 'victim/goddess' one they have now.
acuriousbeast 2 months ago
@acuriousbeast Completely agree with you. However, you will get into trouble if you speak like that - the liberal saviours of society will not stand for the idea that women are anything but victims. Heaven forbid that they are only human, like men :-D
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Usually a theatrical finger snap and a 'I don't think so Miss Thing' buys me enough time to get to the door. There's a quote from one of the Bronte sisters that pontificating feminists always bring to mind; (paraphrase) 'It was bad enough to find all mankind hollow, servile, insincere but worse to trust to my own heart and find the same corruption there.' I think it was Charlotte. They hate that one. Telling in a way, I wonder what they fear to see? : D
acuriousbeast 2 months ago
Feminist hate the truth & when they're confronted with the truth they'll get angry!
crypter27 2 months ago in playlist More videos from RockingMrE
@crypter27 Tell me about it!
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE One time I got into a face to face debate with 2 feminist & won,it was about the so called wage gap,after words they just gave me dirty looks along with giving off vibes. Of being wounded,its as if I popped a bubble of one of they're cherished belief's & forever changed how they see the world! The facts alone will not win this gender war,but it will win some hearts & minds on the way to victory.
crypter27 2 months ago
@crypter27 I'm surprised they conceded anything. Usually they just get nasty if you prove them wrong.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Lucky for me I wasn't dealing with hardcore feminist,just misguided women & I don't think they conceaded they had nothing to fire back with after I dropped that info bomb. On they're heads,they couldn't cling to they're dogma after my pepper bombing of logic!
crypter27 2 months ago
Sheer brilliance! As always Mr. E!
rendarsmith 2 months ago
I like this guy, he speaks with logic
HeavensRevolution 2 months ago
I took a break from the MRM because of all the inevitable negativity. I come back and low and behold, the sexist feminists are still at it.
Oh w8, my fault, i forgot to take into account the distinction between different types of feminists. What I meant to say was that the sexist sex+ feminists are still at it. Sorry feminists.
JackofOneTrade567 2 months ago
@JackofOneTrade567 Yeah, the sex+ fems are the champions of "equality." :-D
RockingMrE 2 months ago
Good stuff, mate! Thanks for your succinct expounding.
GorgeousGeorge108 2 months ago
@GorgeousGeorge108 Happy to help :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
Evolution is bunk, your way too smart to believe in such nonsense!
MemeFuhrer 2 months ago
indeed dv is a tool to falsify public opinions, to make socioses, to make transgenerational collective cognitive dissonances, the making of hardworking-obeying feminized homophile shitizens, though concerning destroying normal families (thus most of the time children&fathers!) dv-vawa is only a small and minor part, there are 'men' promoting 'save' but realize that fathermovement and also radar is infiltrated with femini$Sm-samesex ..
AdVader 2 months ago
Lacigreen is a joke and a whore
snakebitgoat 2 months ago
@RedLanternXY "We need to invest in reproductive technology and find a way to reproduce without women. We don't need them anymore, and I say fuck them"
Bravo maestro.
MoorLetoh 2 months ago
Great Video !
Thanks so much !
So, how do we make All Men in Western Society aware of these problems cause by 45 years of "Feminist" Domestic Violence Industry Evil Indoctrination that is now Indoctrinated into Politics, the Government, Courts, Police and General Public, that:
- Women are Good, Men are Bad!
- Women are helpless Victims, Men are Perpetrators!
- Women need Help and Protection, Men must be Restrained, Prosecuted and Jailed! ?
PutaDeInmigraVAWA 2 months ago
@PutaDeInmigraVAWA "Great Video ! Thanks so much !"
You're welcome. Thanks for your comments and view :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE .
Thanks !
Thanks for the Videos you have made on False Accusations of Men by Women inspired by the Feminist Domestic Violence Industry Propaganda of Lies and Lobby and Joe Biden's Violence Against Women Act - VAWA - A Misandric and Unconstitutional Legislation that Grants $1 Billion a year - Every Dollar of which used to Destroy the Traditional Family as well as the Civilized Society we used to have.
More videos on how we will defeat this venom will be greatly appreciated !
JusticeGuy14 2 months ago
Feminism is Probably the Most Destructive movement for Society today.
Feminism = Anti-Marriage = Anti-Family = Slutty Women = Divorce = Abortions = "Men are Rapists" = Misandry = Domestic Violence Industry Propaganda of Lies = False Accusations = Same-Sex Marriages = Zero Moral Values = Destroyed Fathers/Men = Destroyed Families = Destroyed Civilized Society
This is a Recipe for a Quick and Complete Destruction of our Society.
G00gle: Immigration Laura Martha Granados
PutaDeInmigraVAWA 2 months ago 2
@PutaDeInmigraVAWA "Feminism is Probably the Most Destructive movement for Society today." EXACTLY !!! projecting own weaknesses on others is also a very important point !
okowrygo 2 months ago 5
@okowrygo .
Thanks ! Yes... Claiming the Victim Status leads to "Victim Mentality" which leads to "Fight or Flight" response or in other words: Indecriminatory attacks (against the Male gender), attack to destroy...
Feminism is cuasing the Destruction of Men, Boys, Fathers, Families and Society.
This proves that We, Men, cannot EVER let Women handle important matters such as Law-making, Policy-making, Society matters and Morals.
We, Men Must take back the Leadership Seat !
PutaDeInmigraVAWA 2 months ago
In other words comedians like George Carlin is full of shit on this one, my bad.
mike61524334251 2 months ago
@mike61524334251 Nah, George Carlin is ok to a large extent. It's just a little shortsighted to blame everything on men without seeing what women have done in the background, not to mention the desperation for men to pander to women.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
different relgions,counties and cultures. Socialization encourages our biology or at least it used to because its what was best for the species. However soecialization on its own can never created gender....feminisnt have tried to socialize women into men and vice versa and even after 50 years the best they could do is create a counterfeit version of both.
Dobogio 2 months ago
@Dobogio You've given an explanation that clearly shows how biology is the biggest explanation for male and female roles in history, though feminism will tell you otherwise. Cheers for your comment :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
A comment was made awhile back that stated that rock should also acknowledge that some aspects of our gender are socially constructed...well heres the thing about that. Social gender constructs are created to passively enforce our biological tendecies since its in our bilogical tendecies that the suruvial of the species will continue through. Socialization doesnt create it simply enfoces, this is preciesly why men and women have shared the same division of labor throught history through many...
Dobogio 2 months ago
Awesome video. Thanks for the useful comparison of a man's cost of public accusation of rape, falsely or justly, is of a costly comparable to the act of rape.
feministsAreCorrupt 2 months ago
@feministsAreCorrupt Cheers. Rape anonymity should work both ways until a case is resolved. It will make the false accusation of rape a less dangerous tool.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RedLanternXY You are highly articulate in your argument here.
I look at it like this: If we don't find a way to fix this, who will?
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
Truth
ObserveReality 2 months ago
Women can be violent too, indeed.
A few years ago, I read a study about infanticide and pedophilia. It explained that women are more likely to abuse and kill children than men (that's a BIG taboo)... and are also more likely to use violence if the kid is a little boy (supposed to be stubborn and too agitated). There is also a lot of informations about this topic in the free book from freedomain radio "the origin of war in child abuse".
EuropaPhoenix 2 months ago
@EuropaPhoenix infanticide I believe occurs higher in male children for example than female children and the State protect this figure from being made public and denies it. Infanticide is a law which states as long as the child is under 1yrs old it can be killed by its mother and it will not be treated as murder- I have studied this a lot myself. Female Pedophilia is related to a Lilith complex in my view as having authority over men- both conditions stem out of the same complex to kill the man.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@EuropaPhoenix I am hearing more and more about the reality of women as abusers. It is something I am going to look into more. It needs to be heard because it is the job of people like me to make sure the full picture is provided. If you find that study the feel free to send it on to me. I am slowly getting through "the origins of war" on freedomainradio".
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE I'll try to find it, but I'm afraid it was written in French.
Anyway, I'm glad to read that you want to explore fairly and completely the reality of violence.
It is a very serious problem.
EuropaPhoenix 2 months ago
Good post, rocking.
bweazel 2 months ago
@RedLanternXY Let's start on the basis of accepting that there were no winners and losers in history when it comes to the sexes. From here we can adapt our roles in society since modern innovation allows us to do so. Men and women reporducing naturally and happily coexisting is essential to the future of mankind - without this we will walk into a Huxlian nightmare.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
What they have bigger dicks? Bomb them! And of course the bombs, the bullets, and rockets are all shaped like dicks. I don't understand the part of it, but it is part of the occasion.
Now does this sound true or just weird MrE?
mike61524334251 2 months ago
@mike61524334251 It does sound weird. Once again we have a man who should know better and simply can't connect the dots to see that women are what men strive to impress above all. It would all be for nothing to men if they didn't have women - and women love to play on that power. History tells us that many powerful men had a woman behind them pulling the strings.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
Because they are afraid that someone else has a bigger dick out there somewhere. Men are basically insecure about the size of their dicks so they go to war over it, you don't have to be a political scientist or a history major to see the bigger dick foreign theory at work, it goes something like this (continued).
mike61524334251 2 months ago
According to the late comedian George Carlin, in January 1990, where he talked about feminists groups especially he had said: I've got nothing against the feminists, I happened to agree with most the philosophies the feminists I have read, I agree with the most part, men are vain, ignorant, greedy, brutal assholes who are about to ruin this planet. (Continued)
mike61524334251 2 months ago
Good stuff.
I've been thinking for a while that more stats and information gathering, can only have a limited impact on 'The Problem'. That's because The Problem is not one borne of simple ignorance, it's born of WILLFUL ignorance. And that doesn't go away just because it's proved wrong.
It shouldn't boggle you that so many swallow the "1-in-3-women" inventions. These same people would also accept that it was actually 5-in-4 women that suffered some kind of abuse. Sadly, misandry trumps logic.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth I've been thinking the same sort of thing. Where does it end? The person who mentioned the 1 in 3 stat on his vid says he stands for "equality and individuality for all". Alas, I think the only thing we can truly say when we look at history is that agreeing with the majority is when one needs to ask themselves whether it's time to change. Thanks for your view and comments - it's very much appreciated.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth You can say that also about racism in that you do not see racist's disappear because of introduced laws regarding Hate crimes and discrimination. The social injustices will be recognised if MRA's keep plugging away at it and making the arguments more scientific.That is how feminism got a strangle-hold in the first place by the sheer amount of psychologists, and Statists that agreed with the ideology and submitted papers. Its the genesis that we have to tare down that is the problem
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake Ah, but racism didn't suit the state, misandry does. Also, I don't want more laws, I want fewer.
The '1-in-4' crowd i.e. most people, don't think about what such a stat means. If they did, even for a minute, they'd see how impossible it is. '1-in-4' is not used as a stat, it's used as a mantra.
Feminism didn't advance due to junk-science. It was state mandate, capitalising on ignorance, emotion and prejudice. Even if we tackle ignorance, the other two issues remain.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth What if laws introduced by MRA campaigns remove other laws, you get what you want then. I agree with you that Misandry having studied it for a very long time psychologically is far more a memetic that racism is, it is far more insular(see insular cortex)and unintuitive. Mens abuse- to break the condition is going to be the hardest fight that mankind will ever face, it has genome and evolutionary evidence attached to it, this is why its can operate shibboleths. Part two to follow..
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth feminism advanced due to the fact the junk-science it used was bought without question.Firstly Misandry is as old as man has been parented. State mandate is authorized because state persons are reared by Matriarchical Paternalism which is misandric, if you really study psycho-analysis,it has a kill-the-man sydrome also. Both had the other ones complex reinforced.Female insula cortex has created this infallible system, you see this by truly studing family law or feminist linguistics
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake "What if laws introduced by MRA campaigns remove other laws, you get what you want then." lol. Agreed!
"To break the condition is going to be the hardest fight that mankind will ever face". Also agreed. Further, I think that it's a fight that will be carried out by the few and not the many. If it's accomplished at all, then the great work will be done by handfuls of men, not armies of men, simply because the armies don't exist, and are not likely to.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth Very much agreed.. it is however like training an army, men on Youtube do need to be given the evidence by the handful or few as they would be taught to fire a gun. Because man is the workhorse of society we do have a smart/dumb divide in the Mens Movement- the bottom rungs vent by sounded off and coming over as Misogynists because of a science reason for their frustrations. I constantly wish more intellectuals would come look at the evidence because it yields so much new science.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth Misandry may suit the state in the short term. But in the longer term, making the most productive half of the population scapegoats, is a colossal blunder that may end up collapsing our civilisation in due course. Scapegoats have traditionally been minority groups or 'others', who could be persecuted without threat to the foundations of that society.
If you haven't read it, "Old hate, new victims" on the menaregood blog is worth a read for the parallels between racism and misandry.
dalriada842 2 months ago
@dalriada842 I hear you, but whilst the 'misandry bubble' type perspective is all well and good, keep in mind that there are more people interested in Elvis Presley memorabilia, than have ever even HEARD of this strange issue called "men's rights".
The more compelling reality that I see, is that men won't allow such a bubble to burst, no matter what the cost to themselves. Irony probably doesn't get more awful than that.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth That's a depressing thought! I have to say that when I raise these issues at work, amongst the casual sexism from the women, they also seem to be more receptive to the message than the men. Of course they may just be humouring me, instead of ignoring me like the men! I probably seem like a demented loony to them all. :(
dalriada842 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth fair point, but empirical integrity can only serve men better. One in three women may not be assaulted, but men should be able to say how many were assaulted over what period of time and to what degree this is inconsistent with feminist approved numbers if they ever find themselves in that conversation. Even if its just a conversation with other men.
manicbranic 2 months ago
@manicbranic Well, you're right that that we should have the facts. I just think that the facts have barely anything at all to do with the main battle. Which is a shame, of course, because if they were important, there wouldn't BE any battle.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth There are no facts or figures to be had- I have looked for them. The institutions are being obstructive because they do not want society to know the truth. Just look at how politicans argue over different statistics etc... When Anti-MRA groups on YT have used this statement, I have sat back an laughed. You will not get stats as the police and courts do not keep records- this is why the administrative courts must be forced into public inquiry. A brand new social paradigm must come.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@manwomanmyth Take for example when a NMO is made- a Non-molestation order, you will not find how many are made on women or men because it is all men and they do not want the real evidence to come out.For example what most men dont know is that when this is performed- three of these are duplicated the courts hold 1 The police the other and the final one goes to a central data base system or MI5,Men dont know this, how its all being made into a confluence with other laws as a police state on them
apekillssnake 2 months ago
I know you'll claim that all feminists more or less subscribe to your depiction of the movement, but you seem to be describing only the man-hating radical feminists. They do play the "oppression" card and rant about alleged "rape culture". I agree that there is a tendency for feminists to claim that all gender differences are "socially constructed". But you're making the same misteke that they make by failing to distinguish between biological & socially constructed differences.
prschuster 2 months ago
@prschuster To continue, women will never be as likely to compete as easily as men in physically aggressive careers like the military or police work, but they will always have an advantage in dealing with small children. These are biological differences which have few exceptions. But most occupations are socially constructed and don't favor either sex, like medicine, business or law. The women's movement has at least opened doors in those areas. It's the rad fems that hi-jacked feminism.
prschuster 2 months ago
@prschuster Thanks for your points. You make some interesting comments. Word of warning however, I have repeatedly had it proven to me that ALL feminists are delusional, and often liars, that will do anything to perpetuate their myths. They rant about the same old hyperbole involving rape, domestic abuse, pay gaps et al - it never ends. Feminism is a philosophy rotten to its core I'm afraid. Look at Laci Green as an example - they all succumb to the lies in the end because they love the crusade.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
I dont have to check out stats, figures and studies regarding female violence etc. Ive lived a long time now and know through personal experience that women are and can be violent etc. Most of any category you wish to choose on DV I can tell you I have experienced and many many men and boys, women and girls can say the same. It starts in the home and its usually if not always from Mother! Thats where people learn violence first. Thanks again for a reminder of truth MrE.
tatiebogle 2 months ago
@tatiebogle All I ask is that we stop making violence a gender issue. The truth is far more nuanced than that. Women are perfectly cpapable of violence. While women are not as directly violent as men they can be incredibly cruel and manipulative - which is a terrible concoction when it comes to abusing children, as well as spousal abuse.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE MrE I agree with all you are saying. But in my experience as a child and adult I have experienced direct physical violence from women. They are well capable of direct violence . Given a chance and armed with the assurance that they are generally immune from prosecution or blame they will unleash their fury. This feminist gender issue as you say clouds the truth of DV and child abuse with the corruption of truth and in many cases justice and vindication for victim and false accused.
tatiebogle 2 months ago
@tatiebogle I am not saying that women are incapable of direct violence - far from it. But criminal profiling often tells us that women can be motivated by cruelty and manipulation. Women CAN use direct violence when they have a broken or subservient victim, but they will also use equalisers like a weapon, object, or drugs to even the playing field.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Agreed, we need to translate those acts into quantifiable means so there's no doubts in the minds of the people.
luckybozo1 2 months ago
Good point. I recall that black lady on a lecture tour at college discussing racism. She snuck around and vandalized her own car with words like "nigger" and "bitch." She was finally found out. What a disgrace!
People should never forget the Duke Lacrosse rape case. False charges led to the end of the entire lacrosse team and season. A top four team! Then the New Black Panthers marched through town demanding justice. Justice is jailing the lying black bitch, you stupid Panther racist pukes!
DexterHaven49 2 months ago
@DexterHaven49 While I can sense your frustration I ask that you don't use racial words like "black" combined with insults on my channel. I have no desire to be dragged into this sort of rhetoric.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE dont be a fucking pussy
allstar00442288 2 months ago
once again brilliant video!! I think their thinking of rape is disgusting. "if you regret sex the morning after then it's rape" or "if you have sex without a condom then the woman regrets it, then it's rape." Feminism is disgusting and has a hold over society, many people cannot see it but those of us with crystal vision can see it very clearly.
BmovieBaby 2 months ago 3
@BmovieBaby There is not only a cultural societal wall to break down, there is also a biological one. Men are programmed to feel that women are "good", while sacrificing themselves to the altar of male disposability.
RockingMrE 2 months ago 5
@RockingMrE This is too true, Steve Moxons book "the woman racket" was an excellent study on this very issue.
Stepstoneau 2 months ago
RockingMrE does a fine job, again, of breaking the stereotypical women only suffer rape and domestic violence lie we all are fed. I know a man that was raped, by another man. Pulled out in a parking garage late at night. There was zero support for him. We lost touch over the years and this was the trigger. I only hope he is still alive and well. Good Job RockingMrE. Well done.
1godthor 2 months ago
@1godthor Male rape is seriously underreported, though where to begin when it comes to women violating men sexually. It is simply too much of a taboo at the moment. Society is not ready for the truth. Cheers for your support :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
Thank you for this. I've been having discussions with one guy who claims to be both a feminist and an MRA who insists that other MRAs don't need to attack feminism in order to address men's issues. We need more videos like these.
TheLordmep 2 months ago
@TheLordmep Be very careful of those who claim to understand men's issues while being sympathetic of feminism. I have yet to find one person who fits this profile who is not a wolf in sheep's clothing. Feminism needs to be attacked because it declared war on men long before men like us woke up.
RockingMrE 2 months ago 2
Liked and favorited!
LeftoverJedi 2 months ago
Cultural marxism has so many destructive tenticles by which it tries to destroy noble integrity of a folk body,and the fact that these tenticles are push by minority group campaigners(i am not talking about races here btw);that some of these groups under the collective umbrella of cultural marxism actually contradict eachothers efforts .Typically the pro porn and degeneracy vs the feminist anti-sex symbolisation of women etc.Two cheeks working against eachother for the good of the same arsehole.
ANGUSJOCKHITLER 2 months ago
Another factor to think about which i won't divert from the topic too much is interacial crime rates of which rape is a common denominator.Advocates of feminism and the eternal "woman victim status" who are also part of the operating mechanics of cultural marxism;I just wonder what they have to say on that aspect,and whether their crusade is the same on those grounds or whether it is conveniently bypassed because it suits(or doesn't suit)their overal agenda(concern for women or family fragmented
ANGUSJOCKHITLER 2 months ago
I remember a woman being austed from her own established organisation(it was a womans refuge of some sort)by feminists who hijacked her endevours to help genuine women because she once suggested that certain women were "serial victims"...
In this the "serial victims" were stealing the resources away from those who needed help who were likely to recover and find a better permanent stability.
Feminists were wasting time with their "all women are victims" mentality.
ANGUSJOCKHITLER 2 months ago
Is that a Mark Rothko behind you??????
Don't agree with everything you say but, boy, are you worth listening to.
godeau12 2 months ago
@godeau12 No, it's a picture painted by my cousin :-)
Thanks for watching.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
If women could only see that they are becoming the knuckle dragging, sex offender, spousal abusers that men used to be. Likewise, GOV is setting them up for an even bigger fall by the Babies 4 Bank, Kids 4 Cash and Body for Booty schemes. But let them swim in their river of denial and when the GOV drops them like a women does to an unwanted man remind them that men tried to help them see they were wrong.
usmcoth 2 months ago
@usmcoth Sorry my man, but you cant use that gender stereotype against men perpetuated by Feminists. The arch you are referring to is a myth, men have always been protective of women with few incidents of provocation where that imagery has been exploited by non-examination of her, or too far small actual figure of criminal males who do pose to have a problem with Domestic Violence i.e. actual males come in have excellent wife, but his dinner is cold on the plate so he sends her to the hospital.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake - lost in translation. I was not bashing men and support your evidence and concepts. I too speak out against the Feminazi approach to men today. Women said they wanted equality but now hate their jobs. They wanted independence and yet they are more dependent. Babies 4 Bank, Kids 4 Cash and Body for Booty schemes have turned nearly 100% of women into nothing more than prostitutes. AChildsRight org is where I have spoke my peace on the subject.
usmcoth 2 months ago
@usmcoth Yes I know, I think you were making a very important observation, however it fell foul of a gender stereotype that we have all been programmed by. There is lots of study to be done here just on that one point. We have all been duped by females psyche that this is how things used to be- men being chauvinistic pigs.However MrE made an excellent point at the beginning of his upload that this is just about evolution or a meritocracy for hundred of thousands of years only now being violated
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake - I also speak out about how dramatic a change in such a short period of time that women have turned into the knuckle dragging, spouse beating, child molesting leaders of the world. I suspect that Pharma has poisoned their birth control to effect such a large audience so easily.
usmcoth 2 months ago
I think feminism should be disassociated from women - period. I hate feminists as much as guys do but still get racked in with those stupid b... because I lack a penis :P
chocoboasylum 2 months ago 9
@chocoboasylum Believe me there are women who feel like you do - they are waking up all the time. Check out girlwriteswhat on my other channel's section.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Thanks, I will.
chocoboasylum 2 months ago
@chocoboasylum I (and many other MRA's) agree, and make concerted efforts to do just that, remembering that feminism is an ideology consisting of both men and woman, but not consisting of all women. However it is difficult to disassociate women and feminism when any criticism of feminism results in accusations of "misogyny" (AKA the hatred of women). Feminists maintain a connection by claiming that feminism and woman are synonymous.
MNeilGri 2 months ago
@chocoboasylum There is a necessary dignity that women can find in feminism,sadly though "femassholeism" blights the fight for womens rights.
There are a large number of women determined to sabotage positive activism because they don't want a level playing field.They want to keep operating under the watch of the patriarch.
They wish to be underdogs under the care of "big daddy" not big brother.
It's a good way to keep other intelligent,independent,women down.
MoorLetoh 2 months ago
once again, great vid
MGsven 2 months ago
@MGsven Thanks :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
I think the MRM needs to grow and for it to define its own study and definition of the word Domestic Violence. DV needs to become as socially repulsive as the word feminism is- because largely it is a disorder of the mind leading to false accusation, than being real. MRA's need to come together and find an appropriate label and in a legal sense campaign for what that definition IS, as with many other labels. DV needs to be put back in its box so to speak as does Feminism. I'll comment more later
apekillssnake 2 months ago
Ah my favorite subject of study- Female on-male violence! Big Subject BIG SUBJECT. Just to add into the debate I dont actually think that Domestic Violence on men should be recognised under that heading. DV admittance by men is actually a way to further emasculate men psychologically inside the same syndrome against men that fails to recognise Male DV in the first place. Like the word Bullied traps or reinforces the victim that way, part of the condition is being reinforced. Im adamant about ...
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake Personally I think the admittance that domestic violence is gender blind is a result. The truth is now emerging that, while men and women are different in their approaches to violence, that women and men are both equally capable of abuse. Once violence is no longer used as a political weapon then this will be a result in itself.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE To be clear I'm not saying men should not admitt to DV if they are responsible, and I think also a lot more changes inside the system needs to happen regarding the examination of that. Im saying that once they are channeled by the label Domestic Violence on men they are infact further being abused. I think speaking from the position of someone who has really studied DV by the courts and helped dads in those cases, that it is far far darker than most can imagine, to a remit by most.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@apekillssnake So, I'm seeing you say that male victims of abuse should not be identified as such, but I don't see a proposed solution... Am I missing something? Because without a proposed solution, all your doing is trying to hide/bury these men under more shame, by making the claim to victim even more shameful than it already is.
MNeilGri 2 months ago
@MNeilGri I did offer a title being "female on-male violence", but I put it to a consensus if the MRM could come up with a more definitive term that ensured no victimology. That is the very point I am making. I would have to put forwards a thesis on this and I hate writting in the small comments section on anything serious. I treat it as a debate section and expect other MRA's to already be on a par with what I am saying.Lets see if it gets debated or I will write something up and send it to you
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@RockingMrE I agree with your points of it being used as a political weapon used against the personal by Statists. However the reality is that women generate DV and not the other way around. Take for example the DailyMail report Yesturday by Nick Clegg, that is to mask by newly introduced policy from the system internally the evidence or rate at which women abuse men- by saying controlling is to excuse females hitting- for them to say I hit him coz he controlled me- as is DV murder excuse used.
apekillssnake 2 months ago
@RockingMrE If you also look across from this comments bar you will see a female face on the manwomanmyth-comestic violence- the. These person is responsibile inside the system of performing a profiling system on men- of each personality type that uses DV that affectively is impossible for any innocent male to not be typecase by. As proof of the abuse of DV inside the system, no such profiling system exists for women who perpetuate Domestic Abuse by the insular region of the brain. NO TIME TODAY
apekillssnake 2 months ago
Great job man! SPEAK UP AND TELL THE WORLD YOUR GREAT OPINION. You are right! Tell them off!
You are great! keep spreading the word of the hypocrisy of feminism.
crangdaniel 2 months ago 6
@crangdaniel I will endeavour to continue to do so ;-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
50 years is certainly a long and debilitating time. Bezmenyov said in that KGB vid that it's 2 generations needed in terms to wash out the education factor in brainwashing.
pinegrove33 2 months ago
@pinegrove33 Yeah I remember Bezmenyov saying that. We're not dealing with rational people anymore. They are truly brainwashed beyond repair in most cases. They have to be frozen out of the process and exposed for what they are. Failing that people have to be angry enough to stand up and say "no more". There is no other choice except total assimilation by these leftists.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
I commend your patience to be able to sit through an annoying Laci green video.
lashkaretoiba 2 months ago
@lashkaretoiba Yeah, she is clueless. She obviously thinks that because she quotes that 1 in 15 men are victims of domestic abuse, along with the rest of her hyperbole, that she is an egalitarian.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE How benevolently egalitarian of her, indeed. I'm telling you, man, when she busted out the glenn beck-esque crazy diagram on the chalk board that was it for me. I lost it.
lashkaretoiba 2 months ago
mister E our lord and master has returned...got only 6 hours sleep which means more time to view!
pinegrove33 2 months ago
@pinegrove33 Rough night huh Uncle Bern? Got another leftist response over the weekend about last week's vid. These whackos just keep making these pathetic videos relentlessly - it's just all ad hom nonsense. I'll leave it here for the amusement of those who care to see how nuts these people are:
/watch?v=XZfPRJb927M
If you can believe it people are actually celebrating Karl Marx winning "best philosopher" in the comment's section.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE nah, i seem to rotate between 6 to 8 hours of sleep. I simply can't get 8 hours two nights in a row. OK, i'll watch that but i always try to watch yours twice too.
pinegrove33 2 months ago
@pinegrove33 Don't bother watching ALL of that idiot's vid. I doubt you will have the stomach for it. I got to just over 5 mins before I could stand no more.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE I watched it all. You didn't miss anything, it was just more of the same profanity and insults! He's the chuckle head! Loved this video BTW.
dalriada842 2 months ago
@dalriada842 I fail to see what the point is replying to these clowns - they are either deluded or desperate for attention - most likely both. It's a waste of time and energy even bothering to deconstruct the fallacious arguments that they put in my mouth - they would only invent more.
Glad you liked the vid :-)
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE they're even making fun of you as a guitarist. How ffing pathetic. What a bunch of desperate losers
pinegrove33 2 months ago
@pinegrove33 They are desperate. Seriously Bern - the leftists on YT are repeatedly on my back now. They hate their ideology being exposed for the hateful lie that it is. Braindead and weak-minded is what they are. They actually believe they are humanists, but nothing could be further from the truth.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE made it to the 2 minute mark, those guys simply cannot respond to what people actually have to say. Total straw man burners.
pinegrove33 2 months ago
@pinegrove33 "Total straw man burners."
Yep. They can't respond to arguments because they don't have any. They just try to distort and hide the truth. Like you always point out leftists are emotional - it is their biggest weapon, but I don't accept their guilt tactics.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE One more thing Bern. I left a few interesting vids in the info section that may interest you. One shows men getting hit on the trains in India - it's a terrible sight.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
In terms of the early women rights movement, I heard it had something to do with the government wanting female voters due to female sbeing easy to control and as such easy voters. I dont know enough regarding this matter at length but does sound like something you have come across?
Dobogio 2 months ago
@Dobogio One thing that is certain about female voting patterns today is that they do generally treat the state like a substitute husband. So they vote for bigger government as a rule. Thus female independence is an illusion under the present system - few woman actually walk the walk, as well as talk it.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Thats the one aspect about feminism that feminist never acknowledge(amongst other things). The state is essentially the new husband, it provides,supports and protects women except instead of being a loving husband who legitimately cares about them it is instead a body of complete strangers looking to gain as much profit as possible. On the note of voters, I believe their was some research done away ago that proved the government"involvement"becamse far more...
Dobogio 2 months ago
@RockingMrE imposing after the female vote was granted. It seems women are more prone to the state...perhaps the social evolutionary biology of women predisposes them to innately follow under a provider/protector. It doesnt get much better in those 2 aspects then the government as we all know.
Dobogio 2 months ago 2
@Dobogio I think there is ample evidence to show that women are predisposed to follow a provider/protector, though feminists desperately try to suggest that it was male oppression that caused this - all lies of course given that there is plenty of proof to the contrary.
RockingMrE 2 months ago 2
@RockingMrE *claps out loud*
Brilliant analysis, brother. Just brilliant.
SPQRImperator 2 months ago
@SPQRImperator Thank you for your applause *bows* :-P
RockingMrE 2 months ago
Something important we should note, surrounding all the hype promoted especially in Sweden, is it so confuses their society that Sweden is more easily lulled into joining the EU, where a privately owned central bank prints the euros and lends it to member govts as they go deeper into debt.
We should find out where these militant feminazi groups are getting their funding. I wouldn't be surprised if the money trail leads right to those very same POCBs (privately owned central banks).
Rockguitarnow 2 months ago
@Rockguitarnow The money trail for Feminism is heavily funded by private groups. It is far from grassroots, which is what Feminists try to suggest.
RockingMrE 2 months ago
@RockingMrE Very true, the rockafeller foundation and many other extremely wealthy groups have finacially sponsored and in a sense been the sugar daddies of the feminist movemnt. I even heard a rumor that Ms.Magazine was run by the CIA...in fact Ive heard a lot of the rumors over how sponsored 2nd wave feminism was by the government.
Dobogio 2 months ago