Geoff Boulton who remains on the panel is even more biased. He worked at UEA for 18 years - has toured the country giving lectures on climate change declaring 'the science is settled', 'the himalayan glaciers will be gone by 2050' and criticising 'deniers'. He shrugged off claims of bias saying 'I think the inquiry needs someone like me'. Looks like he'll be running the show since the properties of the 'issues' paper pdf reveal HE was the author. The fix is in. Standby for the whitewash.
2:32 Jon Snow thinks is the main issue here is not the obvious bias of the rigged enquiry, but that Cambell's resignation would provide a 'field day for the sceptics'. What hope do we have for democracy and freedom in this country when the media are entirely run by left-wing eco-loonies like Jon Snow.
I was very happy to hear Cameron ask Brown 3 times, to confirm that he is introducing a levy in the region of £8k each individual, in respect of his planned, highly flawed new care scheme (rejected by all experts).
Following Brown's refusal to comment, Cameron further confirmed in Parliament that this is the reason why Brown is taking cash payments off the sick & disabled elderly.
This is what I mean about things finally getting into the media.
Have a question do you not find it strange that hemp is not used to make paper and that temps clearly have decreased. NWO scientists are to be trusted like Nazi scientists with their Eugenics bullshit. This one world banking elite need to have their power removed they clearly are not fit to run it and their shcemes can only be called evil trying to tax air and starving Africans to death what scum they are
@properwired Chlorella and Hemp could feed and clothe the world. Back in the 90s (sic) the Rockefella foundation did a study into feeding Africa with Chlorella and found that "it contains too much saturated fats". Now that is TOTAL bollocks. I take this stuff everyday, and as it's a superfood, and to be a superfood it must have the right ratios of fats, proteins and minerals. Same with DMT too, that could have saved about 20 millions lives, but they banned it!
I love the environment to but I belive that such beliefs put little or no faith in our own planet which has survived some of the most extreme of natural disasters, cosmic in scale or otherwise, over the course of billions of years all with life intact, climates change as to do environments, they've been changing for billions of years if the best we as a species can do is a degree or two over a century or more. then I think well be fine. That and due to recent info the data is fake
Well I like the idea of sustainable living and in that sense it strikes me as a good idea to avoid polluting and to replant and grow to the level that we require, while keeping a watchful eye out for things like depleting soils of its own goodness. But to that end I cease being a modern greeny. The people in Greenpeace - the hordes that follow like sheep - are good hearted but emotionally driven. Its no wonder they believe man made climate change is real. I agree the data is falsified (for NWO)
Any independent view will be flawed by MONEY. Everyone needs some of the pie so if X up's the price for Y to write a BLA BLA BLA "Y" will do it for the right money.
Fault with the system or fault with the system maker ?
I think any group of people can become corrupt, especially when there is money to be made. This is why we have inspectors for different things, from medicine to food, metals to timber. Everyone must be held accountable, and I think that's why they got out of hand, in the first place. Imagine if they got away with it.
interesting, even the reporters reporting on it mentions that they needed, not a "skeptic" but someone familiar with the "peer review process" - perhaps what they need is an independent researcher? ;) It would only keep them fair.
Geoff Boulton who remains on the panel is even more biased. He worked at UEA for 18 years - has toured the country giving lectures on climate change declaring 'the science is settled', 'the himalayan glaciers will be gone by 2050' and criticising 'deniers'. He shrugged off claims of bias saying 'I think the inquiry needs someone like me'. Looks like he'll be running the show since the properties of the 'issues' paper pdf reveal HE was the author. The fix is in. Standby for the whitewash.
MMGWsceptic 2 years ago 2
damn, not good at all.
wideshutuk 2 years ago
2:32 Jon Snow thinks is the main issue here is not the obvious bias of the rigged enquiry, but that Cambell's resignation would provide a 'field day for the sceptics'. What hope do we have for democracy and freedom in this country when the media are entirely run by left-wing eco-loonies like Jon Snow.
MMGWsceptic 2 years ago 2
Dear oh dear eh?
Thou shalt not speak?
I was very happy to hear Cameron ask Brown 3 times, to confirm that he is introducing a levy in the region of £8k each individual, in respect of his planned, highly flawed new care scheme (rejected by all experts).
Following Brown's refusal to comment, Cameron further confirmed in Parliament that this is the reason why Brown is taking cash payments off the sick & disabled elderly.
This is what I mean about things finally getting into the media.
FreeBritain1 2 years ago
Linguistic problems. We were just to thick to understand.
kderules 2 years ago
I'm a skeptic and I love the environment..... Is that ok?
(im whooping even now)
voiceboxguy 2 years ago 2
Have a question do you not find it strange that hemp is not used to make paper and that temps clearly have decreased. NWO scientists are to be trusted like Nazi scientists with their Eugenics bullshit. This one world banking elite need to have their power removed they clearly are not fit to run it and their shcemes can only be called evil trying to tax air and starving Africans to death what scum they are
properwired 2 years ago 4
Here Here! I agree with you. As for hemp... I dont particularly mind how paper is made, as long as we replant as many trees as we destroy.
voiceboxguy 2 years ago
@properwired Chlorella and Hemp could feed and clothe the world. Back in the 90s (sic) the Rockefella foundation did a study into feeding Africa with Chlorella and found that "it contains too much saturated fats". Now that is TOTAL bollocks. I take this stuff everyday, and as it's a superfood, and to be a superfood it must have the right ratios of fats, proteins and minerals. Same with DMT too, that could have saved about 20 millions lives, but they banned it!
32GaugeSlug 2 years ago
They banned DMT? Isn't that brain chemical?
wideshutuk 2 years ago
@wideshutuk DDT I mean hahaha. They banned DMT too, as they don't want people realising who they are.
32GaugeSlug 2 years ago
@voiceboxguy
I love the environment to but I belive that such beliefs put little or no faith in our own planet which has survived some of the most extreme of natural disasters, cosmic in scale or otherwise, over the course of billions of years all with life intact, climates change as to do environments, they've been changing for billions of years if the best we as a species can do is a degree or two over a century or more. then I think well be fine. That and due to recent info the data is fake
WoodlandRavah 2 years ago
Well I like the idea of sustainable living and in that sense it strikes me as a good idea to avoid polluting and to replant and grow to the level that we require, while keeping a watchful eye out for things like depleting soils of its own goodness. But to that end I cease being a modern greeny. The people in Greenpeace - the hordes that follow like sheep - are good hearted but emotionally driven. Its no wonder they believe man made climate change is real. I agree the data is falsified (for NWO)
voiceboxguy 2 years ago
Skeptic = objective examiner
1965ace 2 years ago 6
Any independent view will be flawed by MONEY. Everyone needs some of the pie so if X up's the price for Y to write a BLA BLA BLA "Y" will do it for the right money.
Fault with the system or fault with the system maker ?
GuildF40 2 years ago
I think any group of people can become corrupt, especially when there is money to be made. This is why we have inspectors for different things, from medicine to food, metals to timber. Everyone must be held accountable, and I think that's why they got out of hand, in the first place. Imagine if they got away with it.
IntiHehlua 2 years ago 2
interesting, even the reporters reporting on it mentions that they needed, not a "skeptic" but someone familiar with the "peer review process" - perhaps what they need is an independent researcher? ;) It would only keep them fair.
AlterEgoTrip 2 years ago 4