Disproving Evolution: No Transitional Fossils

[greenarcher180]

If you do not believe in evolution then please explain the ability of bacteria and viruses to become resistant to medications, vaccines, antibiotics, etc.

An uneducated, delusional mind is a terrible thing.

[SokemRokemRobot]

Good job...

Since Stephen J. Gould admitted the transitional fossils "absent", he and fellow evolutionist, Niles Elderedge, came up with the Punctuated Equilibrium idea to explain why gradualism doesn't exist in the fossil record. Gould and Richard Dawkins even argued about it. Dawkins would rather lie about the transitionals.

You was mentioning what I typed, at the end of your video, when I was typing it. Instead of deleting my comment, I'm just leaving it :)

[TheWoodyWoodsworth]

It's gonna be funny when Jesus finally comes back... All these hate comments are gonna be so irrelevent. Good job on the video man!

[greenarcher180]

@TheWoodyWoodsworth Jesus coming back? If he ever existed he is dead now. End of story and start of your indoctrinated delusion.

[DrQuinnMW]

I suggest you learn what evolution really is and read CURRENT sources. Why not a textbook in biological anthropology? They usually sum up evolution and especially human evolution really well. The 6th edition of Michael Alan Park's "Biological Anthropology" is what I read in my intro to Bio Anthropology and I recommend it.

[craigymann]

Man, I used to be a hard-core evolutionist and read science publishings. I started finding a trend in so many articles... "maybe" and "could have" were appearing a lot. There were many assumptions based on nothing. I also seen a trend of evolutionists finding problems with their own research trying to prove their own theories... All the facts kept pointing against what they were trying to prove. It's not that hard to see the truth if you completely take personal views on religion out of the pic.

[zfinet3]

Tiktaalik

[balanceseeker]

Hello. I presume that you are not blinded by the quotes that have been minded out of context that you present. As such, I suggest AronRa's video series, The Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism. Specifically, as it relates to this video, start with the 9th Foundational Falsehood, which covers the very claim you are making here. I assure you that it is worth your time and the information is valid. If there is anything else I can answer regarding evolution, let me know.

Have a good day.

[lumnatiq]

You are interpreting these words so very wrong these words that I can't even comprehend what you are trying to say exactly....

[vader300]

One of the popes even came out and said that evolution was possible if not true. How do you know that not how god set things up

[deepashtray]

Would you please name a company or industry that uses YEC science to produce anything useful or profitable? Energy industry? Minerals? Engineering? Hydrology? Agriculture? Pharmaceuticals? Electronics and computers? Transportation? Shoes? Anything at all....

[davelantor]

...... a example for evolution of human race. Today there are more fossil examples [dont know the current number] ... btw, incase you are not familiar with how Pieces support evolution would be like having a 3000 piece puzzle of world map, and only mission like 10% of the pieces, you would know its the picture of earth, and odds of it being something alse is very remote, but you would be able to reach that conclusion without the need of having all the mission parts of the puzzle.

[thecasinoschool4]

@davelantor your puzzle theory is incorrect. When you have a puzzle it is usually portraying a picture of something you know exists. For instance, a children's puzzle may illustrate a lion. If we have 90% of the puzzle we know where the rest of the missing pieces fit because we have a proven reference point. However, if we have a puzzle which illustrates an animal that nobody has ever seen we cannot assume to know what the rest of that 10% looks like because it's guess without a reference point

[davelantor]

@thecasinoschool4 thats why i used "Like" since i wanted to relay a aspect to the view. In relation to evolution. it comes down to this. Evolution can be proven by several methods, for example retroviruses ... amongst them fossil records is just a bonus. we got fossils, but not every transitional animal was kind enough to leave a fossil, and concerning evolution, there can be billions of transitions. But with other methods combined we can see the big picture, so we dont need to find all fossils.

[davelantor]

Funny thing is if you knew about evolution, you would know that Fossils dont prove evolution.. of before you burst into your keyboard. read this, Evolution was already proven, the fossils are just a extra eye candy, and Surely if you think about it .. i mean just stop the think about it, not every creature that died left a perfectly preserved fossil, But archeologists have been finding many of the mid points, like at the Darvins years there was only known 2 fossils that could be showed as ......

[emancoy]

can you please tell me why the aeroraptor and the archeopteryx aren't transitional fossils?

[TychoCelchu]

There are transitional fossils. Stop getting all of your information from creationist websites, they're blatant disinformation and quote mining.

If you genuinely want to learn about evolution, try a site like talkorigins.

[MassacreBlast]

There are many fossils that corroborate Evolution. I think you just don't accept Evolution because it conflicts with your God belief. Well sorry to say but there is absolutely no evidence of miracles or phantasmagorical beliefs. Sorry to say man but the simplest explanation tends to be correct, when you die, that's it. Simple, effective, most likely the truth.

[TheFallibleFiend]

Old news - and utterly refuted.

[DancingRabbit52]

Fossilization is a relatively rare event. When things die usually they get eaten, washed away or just rot. If scientists found a transition fossil exactly halfway between two previously found fossils would still mean we we would have to find 2 transitions between them and so on and so on. The requirement for transition fossils is an infinite regression which is not possible to produce. Just because we don't know it all doesn't mean we don't know anything.

[DUTWA03]

@DancingRabbit52 Very well said sir. Two thumbs up!

[thecasinoschool4]

@DancingRabbit52 not knowing a minimal amount could be enough to create a gravely inaccurate theory though. 100 years ago scientists were SURE of certain things that have now been disproved by science itself. At one point, for instance, scientists were "SURE" that the atom was the smallest thing on earth, now they know differently.

[DancingRabbit52]

@thecasinoschool4 Of course scientific theories change as we gain more scientific data. That is why science is superior to bronze age books when it comes to giving us an understanding of the world around us.

[BlessedShreder911]

awesome job God Bless

[MrSkate4weed]

idiot, its becoming more complete everyday, also look at and research the fact that a human fetus starts off looking exactly like a fish, then continues forming into shapes similar to other animal fetus, not to mention we share 98% of our DNA with chimpanzees, about 80% with wolves (just an example) and most other mammals, 60% with most plant life, we even share genetic code with viruses, bacteria, all types of archaea, go learn about science, it proves evolution, any logical man will see it

[thecasinoschool4]

@MrSkate4weed actually, sharing 60% of our dna with most plant life proves that sharing 98% of our dna with chimps doesn't mean anything.

[MrSkate4weed]

@thecasinoschool4 it proves we are all somehow related, there is so much unknown though, no one will even know how life began, but thanks to science we can pick up on it somewhere in the middle and know how shit went from there, same species- extremely close dna

same genus - very close dna

same family- close dna

order- similar

class- related

phylum- shared

kingdom- dna in common

After all DNA and physical features are the classifiers of all things living

[PluralOfEverything]

So you trust science when it denies evolution, but not when it supports it. It sounds like you're biased. When a christian claims to have evidence against evolution, you must see how dubious it is. You're clearly just trying to maintain and spread your belief in the magical sky daddy, for which there isn't even evidence to refute. All you have are arguments, and they only go so far.

[thecasinoschool4]

@PluralOfEverything Christians do not reject science though, they simply reject the evolutionary "THEORIES" (THEORIES, NOT PROVEN FACTS BTW) so your argument doesn't hold weight. They can use science to support their claims as well as reject some arguments of many scientists. it doesn't mean anything

[PluralOfEverything]

@thecasinoschool4 Theories ARE proven facts. A hypothesis is an untested guess and the word you were trying to think of.

[thecasinoschool4]

@PluralOfEverything not true, a theory is the same as speculation. It may have been constructed by observing facts and interpreting them in a certain way, but a theory is not a proven hypothesis (i.e. a fact in itself)

[PluralOfEverything]

@thecasinoschool4 You are quite wrong. Have you heard of music theory? It doesn't mean music speculation. Have you heard of atomic theory? We're pretty sure that atoms exist, since we've split them and used them to blow up cities, but it's still called a theory. A hypothesis is a guess as to the explanation for natural phenomena. A theory is what happens when many scientists do independent research and experimentation and agree on the same thing.

[TucsonDave111]

Did you miss the fact that we actually HAVE Lots and lots of transitional fossils?

You’re ignoring the bulk of the evidence and choosing every small gap to suggest evolution didn’t happen.

Cherry picking rare comments from honest scientists.

This is really disgusting. Here’s an idea. Next time you or a loved one needs medical care please go to the church instead of a hospital.

Much of modern medicine is based on the fact of evolution.

[patrickledford420]

just an ape? we ARE apes

[DancingRabbit52]

@patrickledford420 Yep. We ARE apes. We are also mammels and animals. Few still dispute that we are animals. I don't understand why the big deal over us being a species of ape.

[JesusLovinBuddy]

@k87jury So are you saying the information taken from the science journals I listed in the more information box has been perverted to reflect a young earth creationist perspective?

[k87jury]

@JesusLovinBuddy

Yes. Amazingly yes. Not to mention that they mixed in a whole bunch of lies as well.

[JesusLovinBuddy]

@k87jury regarding that video it seems evolutionists and creationists are just looking at the same fossils and are coming up with two different stories. I mean if you look at what he said (the person in the video) regarding Lucy and what I said you get to completely different stories. I claimed the added knee joint found far away did not belong to that same fossil but he claims it is a great transitional creature. To be honest it seems he is wrong at least on that point.

[whitefox998]

@JesusLovinBuddy Did you not actually look at the references you copied and pasted? Most of your sources are from the seventies and eighties, and I didn't see any that post-date 1994. Honestly how do you expect to turn people on to your religion when you repeat the exact same quote mines, fallacies, and out right lies that we "evolutionists" have heard and refuted so many times before? Also, could answer this question; what would you accept as a transitional species?

[k87jury]

@JesusLovinBuddy

Actually the knee talked about was not Lucy's and was never added to Lucy. It was a misstatement at the press conference. He was stating that a fossil knee that had been discovered a year earlier was X distance from where they found Lucy.

Creationists have been corrected on this repeatedly, but they don't care. Not to mention that a lot of the other information that you presented about Lucy was not true. I am serious about the Skype thing.

[McTaggStar]

@JesusLovinBuddy: JesusLovinBuddy, I'm gonna tell you what I tell every one else. Only when you fully understand a subject and all its intricacies can you criticize it. You do not understand evolution. I guarantee it. Only can you really understand it when you have an understanding of molecular genetics, which I'm willing to bet my tuition that you do not. My advice: (1) shut up because you're a fool, (2) go to school and learn biology. G'day.

[JesusLovinBuddy]

@k87jury Also if you make a response I would really love some science journals or some authentic sources so I can go and check it out for myself. A video like the one you posted makes it difficult for me to go back and check out the original research.

[BlizBob]

@JesusLovinBuddy

You can find many videos here on youtube where scientists themselves explaining how they know that evolution is the correct explanation to the variety of species on this planet.

You might actually check out a video where Kenneth R. Miller explains how DNA is undeniable proof that humans and chimps share a common ancestor.

In some countries people are comdemned to death on genetic evidence alone.

[SPACKlick]

I will deconstruct this video at some poin. You at least seem to be trying but you're way off.

[lnmylife]

You don`t know what evolution is, sorry. You are talking about something very different, i advise you to go to wikipedia and reed what evolution is, that should make you understand it. :D

[Jason442200]

Notice that all his resources are from the 70's and 80's and some as far back as 68. Common man.

[bdoughty814]

My gosh a basic internet search will yield many transitional fossils.....

[David578593]

Glad to see a new video dude =), keep it up

God bless from Canada,

David

[flyingscience]

Creationist are religiously motivated to fight science and defend their tradition .Evangelicals have lost 25% of their kids to secularism in 10 years due to surfing the net and self educating themselves .Fundamentalism can be left if you are curious , study and then be brave enough to leave

[ladyEulaelie]

When general scientific ideas & principals that were once held are proven, undeniably, erroneous and flawed, we HAVE to expel those concepts. It only makes sense to me. Find another theory. I understand that there doesn't need to be an answer for every gap in the theory of evolution. Thats impossible. Lets look at the big picture. Instead of bits & pieces of informatio mending together nicely, the theory is crumbling...being held only by ppl who are terrified of the theory being wrong.

[saintpine]

@ladyEulaelie says "the theory is crumbling...being held only by ppl who are terrified of the theory being wrong."

Where did you read about this ?

in a new bible translation ?

[ladyEulaelie]

This is about SCIENCE....NOT about religion. What is fact and what is fiction...what is the manifestation of man's repudiation and phobia of God/god''(s)?

People may struggle with there being a God...but God or no God, there is no way anyone should accept the theory evolution theory.

The majority who hold on to the theory of evolution are pretty much there hanging by their finger nails for better or for worse. Some (not all) are just bound to it b/c it has become apart of their identity.

[flyingscience]

@ladyEulaelie The theory explains the mecanics of evolution . Evolution is on shakey ground ONLY in creationist literature and the illiterate sheeple who buy into it . Take the time to campare and contrast mainstream science VS creationist claims . New transitional fossil species are found every 7 weeks on average .

[flyingscience]

@ladyEulaelie Genome maping has now trumped fossils as evidence for evolution .There are gapless records of several invertabrates known . Creationism is dead as is ID both are illegal now to teach in public schools .Study hard to free yourself from fundamnentalism .