WW3 is coming Jew are about to started again, but this time it's going to be Nuclear those cities in the america will be decimated america will not exist
After ww1 sudetenland and ostpreussen was give to chech and polen with the deeep evil knowledge that the deeep and brutal german hate from this lands will bring nothing but problems and ethnic hate to central europe ! Engeland is nothing but the reason for all this misfortune !!
Britans are proud for beating germany in WW2. In my opinion they should be proud that germany couldn't invate thier island. Everybody knows that britan had not he power to beat germany so they needed financial and military help. Btw One day long time ago Bismark said that germany ( that time the german reich ) should focus on the problems inside their bordes. Right decision, today you see what is been left over of the britan empire.
In 1942 in France, there was an attack against the Nazis every 6 hours and in early 1944 that was one every hour, it means more than 8000! So did France totally surrender ?
sat at their cafes watching the troops advance, yea thats the french alright.What a waste of lives liberating that lot.They were doing very well looking after the germans.
Germany has a steam roller for an economy today but it's military isn't up to par. Their military is well trained and well equipped but it doesn't have the power that England or the US does. I can't speak for the French because they are just about as powerful militarily as Germany is. But should the truth be told the major military powers are England, the United States, China, and India.
Germany still kicked the French's ass in WW2. That battle was great. And Hitler humiliated the French when he made them sign that treaty in the railway car of the German's surrender in WW1. And then had it on tour, destroyed the monument & torched the railway car.
the french are shite they could not fight there way out of a paper bag the only thing the french can do is wave a white flag ..hate the french ungrateful frogs
the french are shite they could not fight there way out of a paper bag the only thing the french can do is wave a white flag the ..hate the french ungrateful frogs
The only power in Europe is the European court of human rights. If I was Prime Minister of England, I'd tell them where to stick their pathetic views that favour criminal scum. Who elected those morons anyway?
nice going there allies . where is ur unity now huh.i think its on vacation .u won the war but after learning a deadly lesson. so dont u dare again backstab the world .other wise a second hitler will rise.
@ImperialAdelaar I dont understand what you are implying here? Backstab the world in what way? The western allies always hoped best for europe and the world. The communists not so much. The only thing about france Im worried about is that the radical muslims are taking over and they are not trying to contain this threat. In the usa the muslims are pretty mellow. However it seems when they become a larger percent issues arise
@meronmotors britian is one of main allies part and they won the war against mughals of asia by back stabing them(pretended to be traders) .they tried to backstab america (tea traders) .they back stabbed arabia (lawrence of arabia).now what else do u want to know?
An Englishman, a Frenchman are walking on a beach. They find a lantern and a genie pops out. "I will give you both one wish, " says the genie.
The Frenchman asked, "I want a wall around France, so that no one can come into our precious country." Genie : 'POOF' - there was a wall around France. Englishman asks, " Please tell me more about this wall.
Genie explains, " it's about 150 feet high, 50 feet thick and nothing can get in or out."
Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe.
World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain
War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu
French Revolution - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.
The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.
American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."
Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots
Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.
The Dutch War - Tied
War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War - Lost, but claimed as a tie.
Gallic Wars - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman."
Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.
"What do you expect from a culture and a nation that exerted more of its national will fighting against DisneyWorld and Big Macs than against the Nazis?" — Dennis Miller
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion. You just leave a lot of useless noisy baggage behind." — Jed Babbin, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense
French resistance played her part, but French fighters were not only Beret resistance Hollywood craps. A lot of ignorant Anglosaxons are brainwashed by Saving Ryan and DDAY stuff and sum up WW2 to this event. DDAY operation was huge and useful, but almost a joke compared to the 4 years of Russian bloodbath. Staligngrad, Koursk, and many other battles. 27 million Russian casualties. Total US casualties of this war, on all fronts, Pacific and Europe, were 416800, less than the French, 600000.
Entire parts of France have never seen the least British soldier foot, like all the south who was mostly liberated by Free French divisions of De Lattre. 256000 French soldiers landed there in August 1944, with the help of US logistic. It's the French moutains divisions of Marechal Juin who broke German defenses in Cassino, in 1944. They fought in the Alps, until Germany, even in Normandy with the 2ND Leclerc Armored division. Look Free French Forces or 2ND Leclerc armored division on Wikipedia.
what about the entire nation that Germany defeated in 5 weeks? Pitiful France- most of the country eagerly worked with Germans. Only America propping up France in the cold war kept the lie alive that France is some how a world power, same for England. The world power in Europe is Germany.
@chaipasquoi I was merely pointing out that a handful of people were harmed for being "collaborators" when the whole nation of France worked with Germany- not in the least all of Vichy. So why a few scap goats. Any way, Germany is master but Europe is no prize.
@trevlacme My grandmother had a way to look away from stereotypes:she was in the salvation army in Paris, hidding Jews, was denounced by collaborators to a German Captain who helped her to escape refugees to Switzerland... some soldiers in Switzerland helped her, while a few bankers collaborated like many others around the world (even England and US) with an international banking corporation called the BIS who collaborated with Nazism....the world of this time was already a mess.
It's always easy to talk,when you know wars only in movie theaters,watching saving private Ryan craps.When i read dumb comments as "most of the country eagerly worked with Germans",it makes me laugh.The big majority of the French population was indifferent,and above all interested in looking for something to eat.Collabors and resistants were only a tiny minority.The French experienced centuries of wars in their backyards when USA were still a desert populated by Indian nations.
I don't think that it's the French state who promoted this idea.I think that it come from Hollywood industry,with their dozen of films about this thing during decades,after the war.There were maquis,for instance in Central France, in Limousin region,in Brittany,or in the Alps.They suffered atrocious casualties and inflicted heavy losses to Wehrmacht and SS, particularly in the Vercors maquis. Others resistants were involved in undergroud networks, providing informations to allied.
@Camarale Come on now, don't French schools books also promote the idea? They teach that France was liberated by the resistance and De Gaulle, when it was the British and the Americans essentially who liberated France from the Nazis.
I think that your views are biased.Everyone in France knows that it was allied troops who did the big part of the job,mostly US.Concerning this point,the truth needs to be adjusted,too. DDAY battle was only 2 months, compared to 4 years of ferocious fights on Russian front.It's there that 80 % of Nazi war machine was really defeated. A lot of Anglosaxons ignore that a French regular army participated at many battles after 1942. Free French regular troops were 1,3 million in 1945.
But, as i previously said, the enormous majority of French population was indifferent and interested above all in one thing : survive to this shit, like British in Coventry or London under the blitz. French fighters, them, were on both sides. One of the most famous SS division was French, the 33rd Charlemagne Waffen SS division. They fought on eastern front, and were the last defenders of Hitler's bunker during the battle of Berlin.
@trevlacme It is a shame that the french hate the american so much when we did like them. THe brits are good people, Even thought we critisis each other the brits are our very closest allie. No matter the situation the brits have our back as we do there. Germany is our second closest allie in europe.
@trevlacme Well germany has always been a world power as far as recent times. Great britain is a world power but they are an island, No Island is able to become powerful without taking. They used to take they no longer do so it is VERY difficult. Thats why japan wanted china. The usa has land. ussr had land. you need resources. Isnt germany the largest west european nation?
@trevlacme Germany is the economic power of Europe, not military one. Only France and England are!
Btw, you speak about the French defeat in 1940 against Germany but you should know that Germany won because they raped international recognized belgian neutrality and French army chiefs didn't expected that and because Germany also pass through the Ardennes which were thought impassable! (same for the Albert Canal). Believe me if Germany haven't done that, it would've be very difficult
@91OCB hmm im sure in 1942 the france army still had never a chance against the wehrmacht same with england they had NEVER a chance without usa s help to fight allone against the germans
the germans had the better technologies ,weapons and troops etc...
and today germany isnt more a military power just because they had lost 2 world wars exspecialy the ww2
but germany are still today high superior than england and france in economic ways and thats the main in the 21st century not a army !!!
@budspencer1929 In 1942 yes of course. But as I said, and even Hitler and Goering said it, in 1939 and in 1940 as Germany invaded Poland, they were very scared about France invading Germany cause at that time, France had a stronger army than the Wehrmacht. And yes, economic is very important today, and the EU wouldn't be strong enough without Germany. But for countries like France, Germany or England, the military makes the importance of the diplomatic voice.
@91OCB nope. actually i can read. and i do read that you complain about "international recognized neutralitys" which were ignored. thats war and every side gives a fuck about "international agreements" as soon as they do not go along with their aims. and the fact that the french were beaten because of a military masterstroke does it make "unfair" in your eyes?!?! and please keep your "if"s to you, because it wont change anything and all you you-tube experts wont rewrite history anyways.
@satanic666sonic You know what i hate about people like you? you are trying to make me say something i never said. Blitzkrieg strategy was one of the greatist ideas of military. German wehrmacht did something that France and the Allies thought impossible. Pass the Albert Canal and the Ardennes in Belgium. It's a masterpiece of strategy. I never said the unlike. But the fact is that if Germany did respect belgian neutrality, it would 've been difficult for them to pass the Maginot line.
@91OCB there was no belgian neutrality because british and french troops were allowed by belgium to pass their frontiers to fight against germany the german army just moved a bit faster same in norway then they were just a few hours ahead of the british expedition corps
@mjoelnir58 False again... French and British went into Belgium after Germany invaded Belgium and they did this to stop the Germans and to save the Belgian Neutrality like it was said in the treaty. Belgium even separated her troops in 1939 and send half of them at the french border cause France asked Belgium to pass. Do you know what is "War law"? A neutrality is there to be respected. Germany got punished for not respecting it. Now stop saying bullshit please
The difference between what the British / French troops and what the German Armies did in Belgium wasn't one of speed - it was one of permission and of intent. Britain and France had Belgium's permission to enter and their intent was to defend Belgium. Germany entered without permission with a view to subjugating its people and using it as a route to attacks on other nations. This sort of action is generally referred to as an invasion.
Hitler himself considered France (and even after 1940) as the greatest ennemi for Germany, he speaks about that in "Mein Kampf". Also, Hitler often said to his nearest friends and ministers or army chiefs that the french nation would always be able to raise an Army even in 1942. People who says that French Army was Bullshit and that they lost the War like shit do not really know about this battle and about military.
@Tonin41992 to be fair we should have never joined the race to prop up the British and French (and Dutch) "empires" world war 2 is a direct result of world war 1 which was one of many Bristish attemps to weaken, divide and dominate Germany and continental europe. America had no business before, now or ever in saving and propping up England
@trevlacme You speak as though USA had no part in WW1 nor in the framing of the Treaty of Versailles that set the conditions that led to WW2. Britain (not just England) entered the war in reaction to Hitler invading Poland. Britain did not have any self interest in entering the war other than in defence of weaker nations as Hitler was continually at pains to sign an Anglo German peace agreement. And if USA had not entered the war what level of horror would the holocaust and subjugation reached?
@66scampi One can only wonder why England did not bomb the rail lines to the concentration camps, many of which produced war materials. I guess they were saving their bombs for Dresden and like many peoples occupied by the Reich they were gald to be rid of their Jews, or why did they collaborate so fully in arresting them and handing them over?
@trevlacme But why didn't The US airforce bomb the railway lines? Britain has never had an anti-semitic culture but has a long standing Jewish population and many prominent Jewish politicians across the political divide.
@66scampi Your Jewish politicians pretended to be Anglicans- and Churchill wanted the Jews dead so England could exploit Palestine, but yes America should have bombed the rails too (but we fought on the rwrong side of the war)
@66scampi railway lines were extensively bombed during ww2. part of the reason for the allied victory in normandy was that railways and infrastructure was destroyed depriving elite german reserve panzer units from transport, not allowing them to crush the beachhead in a counterattack
@mackshayster no go to any concentration camp or extermination camp and you can see how perfectly intact they are today. Even though the camps and their populations were actively producing war materials the camps and the rails to them were never bombed-
@trevlacme the camps themselves were never bombed, i was just saying that the allied airforces bombed railways as a way of crippling the german war effort
@66scampi almost 80% of allied divisions on the western front in late 1944 were american, as well as the fact that the us was the almost sole player for the allies in the pacific with help from the aussies, so ww2 probably couldve gone a lot longer if it wasnt for the american entry into the war, and im not even sure if the russians could have beat germany without the american entry
@trevlacme Just read this comment re: to be fair we should never joined...I agree with BabylonSage, you are historically illiterate. How many hundreds of years has it been since the Dutch could be regarded as a colonial power?! Also Britain through the 20th century far from wanting to dominate Europe merely wanted to avoid war. Not heard the term Britain's "Splendid Isolation" refering to its indifference to European affairs other than need to retain peace? Britain's interest was in its empire.
@66scampi You are the historically illiterate one, the Dutch were only thrown out of Indonesia in 1949 after a war for independance by Indonesians and they only gave up when America made it clear they would not support European colonial empires. Britain used American money and corpes to prop up their so-called empire- look up the Suez crisis and see what happened when America said no.
@trevlacme You are missing the point noone is saying the Dutch had no empire but could not be regarded as a colonial power by the mid 20th century. Nor would Spain or Portugal for that matter. Only Britain and France would come into this bracket in Western europe. And you still miss the point that the war in Europe was nothing to do with the British empire.Nor was the war against Japan other than to say that those British troops posted in Singapore etc... came under attack from Japan.
@trevlacme You also seem to be an apologist for Germany. Let us remember that it was Germany that annexed the Sudetenland, etc then invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland. It then systematically brutalised Europe and led the most heinous systematic, state sponsored, industrialised extermination of men, women and children the world has ever seen. And if you read any history you would know that historians such as AJP Taylor and even many German scholars place the blame for WW1 at the door of Germany.
@66scampi Germany was given the Sudentenland and the 3.5 million Germans living there by international agreement. I think you have mixed the actions of the british with Germany.
@trevlacme What?! Germany bullied Czechoslovakia and Britain/France into conceding the Sudetenland and then invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia regardless of promises otherwise. What was Britain guilty of other than appeasing an aggressor? Germany then invaded Poland and we all know what happened next. What planet have you come down from?!!!!!! Germany started two world wars and was responsible for the most heinous genocide imaginable. Britain plus other English speaking peoples to the rescue!
@66scampi: Britain's sellout of their client Czechoslovakia was their last attempt to forge an anti-Soviet alliance with Hitler. Both had been pouring money and weapons to Franco's fascists in Spain, Churchill himself had nothing but praise for Hitler until about 1938. Britain didn't rescue anybody but themselves. Their attitude towards their victims throughout the world differed little from the Nazis.
@hectorbolshevik Point 1. Britain's (and France) "sell out of Czechoslovakia was a desperate attempt to avoid war with a militarily superior Germany 2. Pouring money into Franco is utter nonsense. 3 Churchill spent most of the thirties berating Govt to rearm and take the menace of Germany seriously. He was treated as an outcast for doing so. 4. Britain declared war on Germany after it invaded Poland. Hitler had no desire for conflict with Britain and so Britain acted for common good.
@YUSKHAN Re the good thing...Are you serious? Liberated millions of slaves? Britain had abolished slavery by 1833 the first power to do so. Japan and Germany killed milliions upon millions of civilians on their rampage. They both used POW and civilian slave labour. Germany did not liberate one country through Europe and created its own empire and Japan just swapped one benevolent imperialism for a brutish violent empire of their own.
the american loved slavery they loved the sweet labour and sweat of the black man and loved the sweat fruits and land of the red man, You're forgetting that the same country who dawned from the extinction of Native Americans took up the cause of zionist jew people a centuries later. What happened to 110,000 million native americans, what happened to the 3million vietnamese, 4 million Iraqis and refuges, 1 million Afghans america have murdered more humans then any tyrant on earth
@YUSKHAN Most of Eastern Europe originally invaded by Germany was subsequently occupied and subjugated by the Russians. Only the USA prevented more Japanese bloodshed in the Pacific and only USA and Britain did the same in Western Europe.
Your relay lucky that Russia went against Germany and Japan what would of happened if they didn't Germany,Russia and Japan could have crushed america Germany would probably built their amerika bombers and Nuked america
@YUSKHAN "You're really lucky..." Russia would never have sided with Germany or Japan. Russia was communist and Germany a fascist regime. They were polar opposites. Stalin would have been perfectly happy to not get involved and sit on his half of Poland if Germany had not broken their non aggression pact and invaded Russia.And in any case Russia was heavily armed by the US so probably would not have had the wherewithall to be effective without this support. .
Communism, fascism, zionism same shit, If germany was fascist then america is fascist, what happens when governments get taken over buy cooperation, what did that pig Mussolini say about true fascism, what happened to the 110,000 million native americans the cherokees, camaccees etc were they fascistically murdered
@hectorbolshevik History lesson number two. You need it. The S.U. whilst deserving much credit for its efforts and sacrifice in defeating Germany only entered the war once it was invaded. Stalin was quite content to let Hitler "get on with it" and sit on the spoils of half of Poland. Your comment about the attitude of Britain to"its victims" being no different to that of the Nazis would be laughable if it was not meant with conviction. You are clearly an idiot or have "an axe to grind" or both.
@trevlacme You remind me of one of those mad Irishman that will argue that black is white and white is black and that every action that britain has ever made is wrong and has evil motive. If it wasn't for your pathological love in with Germany I'd say you were a plastic paddy i.e. Irish American.
@trevlacme The Potato Famine? Another great myth that Britain was to blame. Again academics, at least the ones without "an axe to grind", have universally concluded that no fault of Britain here. You are massively out of your depth on all these historical arguments. If you have an opinion at least make sure it is an informed opinion.
@finsterwald181167 I should read back what you have written. It makes no sense at all. Why do cronies like you attribute everything negative to Britain (England)? The parties responsible for Treaty of Versailles included the French and Americans but you choose to blame Britain only. Germany instigated WW1 and someone had to make the peace. Given that Germany was to blame and were defeated then only natural that land be ceded. Europe is full of pockets of ethnic groups living across borders.
@trevlacme "to be fair." Again anyone who has given this comment a thumbs up is an historical illiterate.The First World War resulted from Germany's drive for empire and to compete militarily with Britain and France. They invaded Belgium as a tactic to attack France to initiate the war. The main architect of Treaty of Versailles were the USA and the main driver for punitive German reparations were the French. Hitler fed on the Versailles settlement to instigate WW2.
@trevlacme "to be fair" cont... Britain during the latter part of 19th century and early 20th century had no interest or ambitions at all in Europe save to try and avoid international conflict. It's focus was completely in its empire. If by having no business "propping up England" you mean USA should not have intervened in European conflict in WW2 then you are condoning the mass murder of millions of civilians and also the holocaust.
@trevlacme God, why Youtube is filled with absolutely ignorant idiots? Buy yourself a good book on history or visit a historical library, morons, educate yourself instead of expressing your primitive and pathetic opinions here. Read WHY France failed in the beginning of WWII, read WHAT France and England were like during the Cold war.
@msmoviefanatic They were cast out, society would not accept them, would not sell to them, would not allow them to live with them or near them, until there hair grew out
@playinragz Would it not have been nicer had you said " I would suggest that the right hand corner would be a better place for the copyright label". So sick of unnecessary sarsacasm on YT. That is how wars start.
It was the british and french who started ww1, ww2 vie their Jewish handlers
YUSKHAN 1 month ago
@YUSKHAN yet another stupid moron !! Read up on your history before you comment, find out WHAT actually was the cause of WW1 you moron !
cellarman411 5 days ago
@cellarman411
WW3 is coming Jew are about to started again, but this time it's going to be Nuclear those cities in the america will be decimated america will not exist
YUSKHAN 4 days ago
After ww1 sudetenland and ostpreussen was give to chech and polen with the deeep evil knowledge that the deeep and brutal german hate from this lands will bring nothing but problems and ethnic hate to central europe ! Engeland is nothing but the reason for all this misfortune !!
finsterwald181167 5 months ago 4
@finsterwald181167 very true! and the case of Hungary even worse
trevlacme 5 months ago
Britans are proud for beating germany in WW2. In my opinion they should be proud that germany couldn't invate thier island. Everybody knows that britan had not he power to beat germany so they needed financial and military help. Btw One day long time ago Bismark said that germany ( that time the german reich ) should focus on the problems inside their bordes. Right decision, today you see what is been left over of the britan empire.
JesusSalvatore 5 months ago
Comment removed
tmmy773 7 months ago
In 1942 in France, there was an attack against the Nazis every 6 hours and in early 1944 that was one every hour, it means more than 8000! So did France totally surrender ?
Tonin41992 9 months ago
sat at their cafes watching the troops advance, yea thats the french alright.What a waste of lives liberating that lot.They were doing very well looking after the germans.
xfire7 9 months ago
Germany has a steam roller for an economy today but it's military isn't up to par. Their military is well trained and well equipped but it doesn't have the power that England or the US does. I can't speak for the French because they are just about as powerful militarily as Germany is. But should the truth be told the major military powers are England, the United States, China, and India.
USsocomDeltaForce141 9 months ago
Comment removed
Centurator 9 months ago
@peartreepictures you are right , so fucking right ! can l adopt you , ..lol
APhilCollinsFan 11 months ago
Germany still kicked the French's ass in WW2. That battle was great. And Hitler humiliated the French when he made them sign that treaty in the railway car of the German's surrender in WW1. And then had it on tour, destroyed the monument & torched the railway car.
Brad420Folks 11 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
the french are shite they could not fight there way out of a paper bag the only thing the french can do is wave a white flag ..hate the french ungrateful frogs
PearTreePictures 11 months ago
the french are shite they could not fight there way out of a paper bag the only thing the french can do is wave a white flag the ..hate the french ungrateful frogs
PearTreePictures 11 months ago 4
So, no biased views on this thread then.
yiblon 11 months ago
The only power in Europe is the European court of human rights. If I was Prime Minister of England, I'd tell them where to stick their pathetic views that favour criminal scum. Who elected those morons anyway?
bananasplitsable 1 year ago
Finally someone who make sense ! l dont known what the french put in there pipe,.. BUT,..as to be good stuff.
APhilCollinsFan 1 year ago
@s6u6r6f6 WOW ! BRAVO ! BRAVO ! YOU COULN'T BE MORE RIGHT ON THE TARGET!
APhilCollinsFan 1 year ago
nice going there allies . where is ur unity now huh.i think its on vacation .u won the war but after learning a deadly lesson. so dont u dare again backstab the world .other wise a second hitler will rise.
ImperialAdelaar 1 year ago
@ImperialAdelaar I dont understand what you are implying here? Backstab the world in what way? The western allies always hoped best for europe and the world. The communists not so much. The only thing about france Im worried about is that the radical muslims are taking over and they are not trying to contain this threat. In the usa the muslims are pretty mellow. However it seems when they become a larger percent issues arise
meronmotors 1 year ago
@meronmotors britian is one of main allies part and they won the war against mughals of asia by back stabing them(pretended to be traders) .they tried to backstab america (tea traders) .they back stabbed arabia (lawrence of arabia).now what else do u want to know?
ImperialAdelaar 1 year ago
Comment removed
ImperialAdelaar 1 year ago
An Englishman, a Frenchman are walking on a beach. They find a lantern and a genie pops out. "I will give you both one wish, " says the genie.
The Frenchman asked, "I want a wall around France, so that no one can come into our precious country." Genie : 'POOF' - there was a wall around France. Englishman asks, " Please tell me more about this wall.
Genie explains, " it's about 150 feet high, 50 feet thick and nothing can get in or out."
The Englishman says, "Fill it up with water."
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe.
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
@s6u6r6f6 America should not keep France as an ally, that way we are sure to win (and with Germany excel)
trevlacme 1 year ago 4
@trevlacme Also what on earth did the war in Europe have to do with propping up the British empire? Where did you learn your history from? a comic?
66scampi 8 months ago
World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain
War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
French Revolution - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.
The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.
American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
The Complete Military History of France
Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots
Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.
The Dutch War - Tied
War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War - Lost, but claimed as a tie.
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
The Complete Military History of France
Gallic Wars - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman."
Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
"What do you expect from a culture and a nation that exerted more of its national will fighting against DisneyWorld and Big Macs than against the Nazis?" — Dennis Miller
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion. You just leave a lot of useless noisy baggage behind." — Jed Babbin, former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense
s6u6r6f6 1 year ago
French resistance played her part, but French fighters were not only Beret resistance Hollywood craps. A lot of ignorant Anglosaxons are brainwashed by Saving Ryan and DDAY stuff and sum up WW2 to this event. DDAY operation was huge and useful, but almost a joke compared to the 4 years of Russian bloodbath. Staligngrad, Koursk, and many other battles. 27 million Russian casualties. Total US casualties of this war, on all fronts, Pacific and Europe, were 416800, less than the French, 600000.
Camarale 1 year ago
Entire parts of France have never seen the least British soldier foot, like all the south who was mostly liberated by Free French divisions of De Lattre. 256000 French soldiers landed there in August 1944, with the help of US logistic. It's the French moutains divisions of Marechal Juin who broke German defenses in Cassino, in 1944. They fought in the Alps, until Germany, even in Normandy with the 2ND Leclerc Armored division. Look Free French Forces or 2ND Leclerc armored division on Wikipedia.
Camarale 1 year ago
hahahaha 1:02. he said "gay."
FrieRie 1 year ago
french girls loved hard Nazi cock, the were very sad when they left.
michaelwright999 1 year ago
Rest in peace my german brothers
WIKINGERxFROST 1 year ago
what about the entire nation that Germany defeated in 5 weeks? Pitiful France- most of the country eagerly worked with Germans. Only America propping up France in the cold war kept the lie alive that France is some how a world power, same for England. The world power in Europe is Germany.
trevlacme 1 year ago 30
@trevlacme You type like a tyrant! It's about time that mankind act in a more civilised way and stop to listen to imperialist-primitivity.
chaipasquoi 1 year ago
@chaipasquoi I was merely pointing out that a handful of people were harmed for being "collaborators" when the whole nation of France worked with Germany- not in the least all of Vichy. So why a few scap goats. Any way, Germany is master but Europe is no prize.
trevlacme 1 year ago
@trevlacme My grandmother had a way to look away from stereotypes:she was in the salvation army in Paris, hidding Jews, was denounced by collaborators to a German Captain who helped her to escape refugees to Switzerland... some soldiers in Switzerland helped her, while a few bankers collaborated like many others around the world (even England and US) with an international banking corporation called the BIS who collaborated with Nazism....the world of this time was already a mess.
chaipasquoi 1 year ago
@trevlacme
It's always easy to talk,when you know wars only in movie theaters,watching saving private Ryan craps.When i read dumb comments as "most of the country eagerly worked with Germans",it makes me laugh.The big majority of the French population was indifferent,and above all interested in looking for something to eat.Collabors and resistants were only a tiny minority.The French experienced centuries of wars in their backyards when USA were still a desert populated by Indian nations.
Camarale 1 year ago
@Camarale yes, but after the war the French state promoted the myth that the French mostly fought against the Nazis in the resistance.
Ilikelink 1 year ago
@Ilikelink
I don't think that it's the French state who promoted this idea.I think that it come from Hollywood industry,with their dozen of films about this thing during decades,after the war.There were maquis,for instance in Central France, in Limousin region,in Brittany,or in the Alps.They suffered atrocious casualties and inflicted heavy losses to Wehrmacht and SS, particularly in the Vercors maquis. Others resistants were involved in undergroud networks, providing informations to allied.
Camarale 1 year ago
@Camarale Come on now, don't French schools books also promote the idea? They teach that France was liberated by the resistance and De Gaulle, when it was the British and the Americans essentially who liberated France from the Nazis.
Ilikelink 1 year ago
@Ilikelink
I think that your views are biased.Everyone in France knows that it was allied troops who did the big part of the job,mostly US.Concerning this point,the truth needs to be adjusted,too. DDAY battle was only 2 months, compared to 4 years of ferocious fights on Russian front.It's there that 80 % of Nazi war machine was really defeated. A lot of Anglosaxons ignore that a French regular army participated at many battles after 1942. Free French regular troops were 1,3 million in 1945.
CYCY950 1 year ago
@Ilikelink
But, as i previously said, the enormous majority of French population was indifferent and interested above all in one thing : survive to this shit, like British in Coventry or London under the blitz. French fighters, them, were on both sides. One of the most famous SS division was French, the 33rd Charlemagne Waffen SS division. They fought on eastern front, and were the last defenders of Hitler's bunker during the battle of Berlin.
Camarale 1 year ago
@trevlacme "Two things ar possibly infinite, the universe and human stupidity - and I'm not too sure about the universe" -- Albert Einstein.
Make sure you do not die with only a superificial knowldege of History . . .
sternumagnum 1 year ago
@trevlacme It is a shame that the french hate the american so much when we did like them. THe brits are good people, Even thought we critisis each other the brits are our very closest allie. No matter the situation the brits have our back as we do there. Germany is our second closest allie in europe.
meronmotors 1 year ago
@trevlacme Well germany has always been a world power as far as recent times. Great britain is a world power but they are an island, No Island is able to become powerful without taking. They used to take they no longer do so it is VERY difficult. Thats why japan wanted china. The usa has land. ussr had land. you need resources. Isnt germany the largest west european nation?
meronmotors 1 year ago
@meronmotors Singapore?
trevlacme 11 months ago
@trevlacme Germany is the economic power of Europe, not military one. Only France and England are!
Btw, you speak about the French defeat in 1940 against Germany but you should know that Germany won because they raped international recognized belgian neutrality and French army chiefs didn't expected that and because Germany also pass through the Ardennes which were thought impassable! (same for the Albert Canal). Believe me if Germany haven't done that, it would've be very difficult
91OCB 11 months ago
@91OCB hmm im sure in 1942 the france army still had never a chance against the wehrmacht same with england they had NEVER a chance without usa s help to fight allone against the germans
the germans had the better technologies ,weapons and troops etc...
and today germany isnt more a military power just because they had lost 2 world wars exspecialy the ww2
but germany are still today high superior than england and france in economic ways and thats the main in the 21st century not a army !!!
budspencer1929 10 months ago
@budspencer1929 In 1942 yes of course. But as I said, and even Hitler and Goering said it, in 1939 and in 1940 as Germany invaded Poland, they were very scared about France invading Germany cause at that time, France had a stronger army than the Wehrmacht. And yes, economic is very important today, and the EU wouldn't be strong enough without Germany. But for countries like France, Germany or England, the military makes the importance of the diplomatic voice.
91OCB 10 months ago
@91OCB so whats the point in your comment?
satanic666sonic 10 months ago
@satanic666sonic The point is that Germany is not the world power in Europe in military. Can't you read?
91OCB 10 months ago
@91OCB nope. actually i can read. and i do read that you complain about "international recognized neutralitys" which were ignored. thats war and every side gives a fuck about "international agreements" as soon as they do not go along with their aims. and the fact that the french were beaten because of a military masterstroke does it make "unfair" in your eyes?!?! and please keep your "if"s to you, because it wont change anything and all you you-tube experts wont rewrite history anyways.
satanic666sonic 10 months ago
@satanic666sonic You know what i hate about people like you? you are trying to make me say something i never said. Blitzkrieg strategy was one of the greatist ideas of military. German wehrmacht did something that France and the Allies thought impossible. Pass the Albert Canal and the Ardennes in Belgium. It's a masterpiece of strategy. I never said the unlike. But the fact is that if Germany did respect belgian neutrality, it would 've been difficult for them to pass the Maginot line.
91OCB 10 months ago
@91OCB there was no belgian neutrality because british and french troops were allowed by belgium to pass their frontiers to fight against germany the german army just moved a bit faster same in norway then they were just a few hours ahead of the british expedition corps
mjoelnir58 9 months ago
@mjoelnir58 False again... French and British went into Belgium after Germany invaded Belgium and they did this to stop the Germans and to save the Belgian Neutrality like it was said in the treaty. Belgium even separated her troops in 1939 and send half of them at the french border cause France asked Belgium to pass. Do you know what is "War law"? A neutrality is there to be respected. Germany got punished for not respecting it. Now stop saying bullshit please
91OCB 9 months ago
@mjoelnir58
The difference between what the British / French troops and what the German Armies did in Belgium wasn't one of speed - it was one of permission and of intent. Britain and France had Belgium's permission to enter and their intent was to defend Belgium. Germany entered without permission with a view to subjugating its people and using it as a route to attacks on other nations. This sort of action is generally referred to as an invasion.
TheSmithDorian 9 months ago
Hitler himself considered France (and even after 1940) as the greatest ennemi for Germany, he speaks about that in "Mein Kampf". Also, Hitler often said to his nearest friends and ministers or army chiefs that the french nation would always be able to raise an Army even in 1942. People who says that French Army was Bullshit and that they lost the War like shit do not really know about this battle and about military.
91OCB 11 months ago 3
@91OCB six weeks baby!
trevlacme 11 months ago 2
@trevlacme I accept your stupidity
91OCB 11 months ago
@trevlacme To be fair, you can't blame a nation for surrendering in 5 weeks when your own nation took 3 years to go into this conflict...
Tonin41992 9 months ago
@Tonin41992 to be fair we should have never joined the race to prop up the British and French (and Dutch) "empires" world war 2 is a direct result of world war 1 which was one of many Bristish attemps to weaken, divide and dominate Germany and continental europe. America had no business before, now or ever in saving and propping up England
trevlacme 9 months ago 10
@trevlacme You speak as though USA had no part in WW1 nor in the framing of the Treaty of Versailles that set the conditions that led to WW2. Britain (not just England) entered the war in reaction to Hitler invading Poland. Britain did not have any self interest in entering the war other than in defence of weaker nations as Hitler was continually at pains to sign an Anglo German peace agreement. And if USA had not entered the war what level of horror would the holocaust and subjugation reached?
66scampi 8 months ago
@66scampi One can only wonder why England did not bomb the rail lines to the concentration camps, many of which produced war materials. I guess they were saving their bombs for Dresden and like many peoples occupied by the Reich they were gald to be rid of their Jews, or why did they collaborate so fully in arresting them and handing them over?
trevlacme 8 months ago
@trevlacme But why didn't The US airforce bomb the railway lines? Britain has never had an anti-semitic culture but has a long standing Jewish population and many prominent Jewish politicians across the political divide.
66scampi 8 months ago
@66scampi Your Jewish politicians pretended to be Anglicans- and Churchill wanted the Jews dead so England could exploit Palestine, but yes America should have bombed the rails too (but we fought on the rwrong side of the war)
trevlacme 8 months ago
@66scampi railway lines were extensively bombed during ww2. part of the reason for the allied victory in normandy was that railways and infrastructure was destroyed depriving elite german reserve panzer units from transport, not allowing them to crush the beachhead in a counterattack
mackshayster 6 months ago
@mackshayster no go to any concentration camp or extermination camp and you can see how perfectly intact they are today. Even though the camps and their populations were actively producing war materials the camps and the rails to them were never bombed-
trevlacme 6 months ago
@trevlacme the camps themselves were never bombed, i was just saying that the allied airforces bombed railways as a way of crippling the german war effort
mackshayster 6 months ago
@66scampi almost 80% of allied divisions on the western front in late 1944 were american, as well as the fact that the us was the almost sole player for the allies in the pacific with help from the aussies, so ww2 probably couldve gone a lot longer if it wasnt for the american entry into the war, and im not even sure if the russians could have beat germany without the american entry
mackshayster 6 months ago
@mackshayster re: almost 80% of allied divisions.....And what's your point?
66scampi 6 months ago
@trevlacme Just read this comment re: to be fair we should never joined...I agree with BabylonSage, you are historically illiterate. How many hundreds of years has it been since the Dutch could be regarded as a colonial power?! Also Britain through the 20th century far from wanting to dominate Europe merely wanted to avoid war. Not heard the term Britain's "Splendid Isolation" refering to its indifference to European affairs other than need to retain peace? Britain's interest was in its empire.
66scampi 6 months ago
@66scampi You are the historically illiterate one, the Dutch were only thrown out of Indonesia in 1949 after a war for independance by Indonesians and they only gave up when America made it clear they would not support European colonial empires. Britain used American money and corpes to prop up their so-called empire- look up the Suez crisis and see what happened when America said no.
trevlacme 6 months ago
@trevlacme You are missing the point noone is saying the Dutch had no empire but could not be regarded as a colonial power by the mid 20th century. Nor would Spain or Portugal for that matter. Only Britain and France would come into this bracket in Western europe. And you still miss the point that the war in Europe was nothing to do with the British empire.Nor was the war against Japan other than to say that those British troops posted in Singapore etc... came under attack from Japan.
66scampi 6 months ago
@trevlacme You also seem to be an apologist for Germany. Let us remember that it was Germany that annexed the Sudetenland, etc then invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland. It then systematically brutalised Europe and led the most heinous systematic, state sponsored, industrialised extermination of men, women and children the world has ever seen. And if you read any history you would know that historians such as AJP Taylor and even many German scholars place the blame for WW1 at the door of Germany.
66scampi 6 months ago 4
@66scampi Germany was given the Sudentenland and the 3.5 million Germans living there by international agreement. I think you have mixed the actions of the british with Germany.
trevlacme 5 months ago
@trevlacme What?! Germany bullied Czechoslovakia and Britain/France into conceding the Sudetenland and then invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia regardless of promises otherwise. What was Britain guilty of other than appeasing an aggressor? Germany then invaded Poland and we all know what happened next. What planet have you come down from?!!!!!! Germany started two world wars and was responsible for the most heinous genocide imaginable. Britain plus other English speaking peoples to the rescue!
66scampi 5 months ago
@66scampi: Britain's sellout of their client Czechoslovakia was their last attempt to forge an anti-Soviet alliance with Hitler. Both had been pouring money and weapons to Franco's fascists in Spain, Churchill himself had nothing but praise for Hitler until about 1938. Britain didn't rescue anybody but themselves. Their attitude towards their victims throughout the world differed little from the Nazis.
hectorbolshevik 5 months ago 4
@hectorbolshevik Point 1. Britain's (and France) "sell out of Czechoslovakia was a desperate attempt to avoid war with a militarily superior Germany 2. Pouring money into Franco is utter nonsense. 3 Churchill spent most of the thirties berating Govt to rearm and take the menace of Germany seriously. He was treated as an outcast for doing so. 4. Britain declared war on Germany after it invaded Poland. Hitler had no desire for conflict with Britain and so Britain acted for common good.
66scampi 5 months ago
@66scampi
The good thing about WW2 was the nazi and japs destroyed the british empire liberated millions of slaves
YUSKHAN 5 days ago
@YUSKHAN Re the good thing...Are you serious? Liberated millions of slaves? Britain had abolished slavery by 1833 the first power to do so. Japan and Germany killed milliions upon millions of civilians on their rampage. They both used POW and civilian slave labour. Germany did not liberate one country through Europe and created its own empire and Japan just swapped one benevolent imperialism for a brutish violent empire of their own.
66scampi 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@66scampi
the american loved slavery they loved the sweet labour and sweat of the black man and loved the sweat fruits and land of the red man, You're forgetting that the same country who dawned from the extinction of Native Americans took up the cause of zionist jew people a centuries later. What happened to 110,000 million native americans, what happened to the 3million vietnamese, 4 million Iraqis and refuges, 1 million Afghans america have murdered more humans then any tyrant on earth
YUSKHAN 4 days ago
@YUSKHAN Most of Eastern Europe originally invaded by Germany was subsequently occupied and subjugated by the Russians. Only the USA prevented more Japanese bloodshed in the Pacific and only USA and Britain did the same in Western Europe.
66scampi 4 days ago
@66scampi
Your relay lucky that Russia went against Germany and Japan what would of happened if they didn't Germany,Russia and Japan could have crushed america Germany would probably built their amerika bombers and Nuked america
YUSKHAN 4 days ago
@YUSKHAN "You're really lucky..." Russia would never have sided with Germany or Japan. Russia was communist and Germany a fascist regime. They were polar opposites. Stalin would have been perfectly happy to not get involved and sit on his half of Poland if Germany had not broken their non aggression pact and invaded Russia.And in any case Russia was heavily armed by the US so probably would not have had the wherewithall to be effective without this support. .
66scampi 4 days ago
@66scampi
Communism, fascism, zionism same shit, If germany was fascist then america is fascist, what happens when governments get taken over buy cooperation, what did that pig Mussolini say about true fascism, what happened to the 110,000 million native americans the cherokees, camaccees etc were they fascistically murdered
YUSKHAN 4 days ago
@hectorbolshevik History lesson number two. You need it. The S.U. whilst deserving much credit for its efforts and sacrifice in defeating Germany only entered the war once it was invaded. Stalin was quite content to let Hitler "get on with it" and sit on the spoils of half of Poland. Your comment about the attitude of Britain to"its victims" being no different to that of the Nazis would be laughable if it was not meant with conviction. You are clearly an idiot or have "an axe to grind" or both.
66scampi 5 months ago
@hectorbolshevik Dear god, you should start taking your tablets again you know, you clearly are "not firing on all cylinders" !!
cellarman411 5 days ago
@hectorbolshevik Re: Britain's sellout....Anyone who has given a thumbs up to this comment is an idiot and an historical illiterate
66scampi 4 days ago
@trevlacme You remind me of one of those mad Irishman that will argue that black is white and white is black and that every action that britain has ever made is wrong and has evil motive. If it wasn't for your pathological love in with Germany I'd say you were a plastic paddy i.e. Irish American.
66scampi 5 months ago
@66scampi what Irish? You starved them while exporting their food
trevlacme 5 months ago
@trevlacme The Potato Famine? Another great myth that Britain was to blame. Again academics, at least the ones without "an axe to grind", have universally concluded that no fault of Britain here. You are massively out of your depth on all these historical arguments. If you have an opinion at least make sure it is an informed opinion.
66scampi 5 months ago
@66scampi As an historian you only get a name when your name come to public ! And what name come to public decide the masta !!
finsterwald181167 5 months ago
@finsterwald181167 I should read back what you have written. It makes no sense at all. Why do cronies like you attribute everything negative to Britain (England)? The parties responsible for Treaty of Versailles included the French and Americans but you choose to blame Britain only. Germany instigated WW1 and someone had to make the peace. Given that Germany was to blame and were defeated then only natural that land be ceded. Europe is full of pockets of ethnic groups living across borders.
66scampi 5 months ago
@trevlacme What a stupid arsehole you are !! Does your nurse know you`re out on your own ??
cellarman411 5 days ago
@trevlacme "to be fair." Again anyone who has given this comment a thumbs up is an historical illiterate.The First World War resulted from Germany's drive for empire and to compete militarily with Britain and France. They invaded Belgium as a tactic to attack France to initiate the war. The main architect of Treaty of Versailles were the USA and the main driver for punitive German reparations were the French. Hitler fed on the Versailles settlement to instigate WW2.
66scampi 4 days ago
@trevlacme "to be fair" cont... Britain during the latter part of 19th century and early 20th century had no interest or ambitions at all in Europe save to try and avoid international conflict. It's focus was completely in its empire. If by having no business "propping up England" you mean USA should not have intervened in European conflict in WW2 then you are condoning the mass murder of millions of civilians and also the holocaust.
66scampi 4 days ago
@trevlacme And you are obviously a nut case.
66scampi 8 months ago
@trevlacme The world power in Europe is Russia. Russians will have us by the balls because of the natural gas pipelines.
Grabpowa 8 months ago
@Grabpowa its true. not many people realise that fact.
MrTubbymarshall 7 months ago
@trevlacme
Germany is the fifth largest economy in the world.
The UK is sixth - and you're telling me England has no significance as a world power?
To add to that, France is the 8th largest.
ReadyAimDuck 7 months ago
@ReadyAimDuck Germany is 3rd and rising, England is declining
trevlacme 6 months ago
@trevlacme Even if that were true you've still missed the point completely.
ReadyAimDuck 6 months ago
@trevlacme God, why Youtube is filled with absolutely ignorant idiots? Buy yourself a good book on history or visit a historical library, morons, educate yourself instead of expressing your primitive and pathetic opinions here. Read WHY France failed in the beginning of WWII, read WHAT France and England were like during the Cold war.
BabylonianSage 7 months ago
I was born and I live in Le Mans.
Thank you very much for this precious document.
666Vredesbyrd 1 year ago
what happened to all the women who collaborated???
I know they got their heads shaved but were allowed to live, in the town ?????
msmoviefanatic 1 year ago
@msmoviefanatic They were "given" to US military base, and most of them end up in mass graves.
fangthefeared 1 year ago
@fangthefeared
Thanks, you never hear about this Part of the Wars History
msmoviefanatic 1 year ago
@msmoviefanatic They were cast out, society would not accept them, would not sell to them, would not allow them to live with them or near them, until there hair grew out
sully0001 1 year ago
You need to move that watermark of "ITN" to end side of video. If you can not do that or you got them somewhere, then you void the copyright law.
hornerm5 1 year ago
whats with the image in the center dummy?
playinragz 2 years ago
copyright, thickhead. DOH!
MrJimmyboy1972 1 year ago 3
@playinragz Would it not have been nicer had you said " I would suggest that the right hand corner would be a better place for the copyright label". So sick of unnecessary sarsacasm on YT. That is how wars start.
empressoffrance 1 year ago
Good post.
ryan3571 2 years ago