Added: 5 years ago
From: JoannaDark2
Views: 8,580
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this game along with just about every other game got eaten by codmw and halo 3

    prooves rare right for joining microsoft

  • 4:44

    That's a waterfall. >_>

  • IGN was rubbish those days they get so much more into there reviews now.

  • so do ppl still play this game online?

  • I tried to get online so i could play it but it won't work >:[

  • i tried it todAy. worked fine online. a bit boring for me though

  • the single player was really disapointing but the multipalyer kicks ass

  • I agree - I love multiplayer

  • Would a male homosexual enjoy this game?

  • uh...why not?

  • lol - wtf moment

  • LOL

  • that question makes no sense

    Gay people can be gamers to anything

    You should have said "Would a person like me enjoy this game" than describe your self?

    D8?

  • this game rocked hard all the way till rainbow six 1 then the only started to die of quickly but i believe that theres still about 10 games going online at all time after 3-4 years of release i thought the campaigne was boring and i didnt bother with it and iv still got it now

  • reviwers need to shutup this game is nice and its not like they can make games at all

  • This game is Amazing in my oponion, Everything although the online Kicked ass

  • has anyone notice that Rare lost there edge when microsoft got it

  • I actually think they got better. I never really liked Banjo Kazooie for the N64. Plus, Goldeneye was... Meh.

  • then you obviously didn't play goldeneye in 1997

  • yah games like ghoulies plus the mostrecent banjo and perfect dark were both worse than their predeccesors and if microsft shuts em down like its been rumored for a while ill be pissed i think nintendo should get themback if microsoft losses em at all ya know i guess that didnt make too much sense

  • or they could go work for sony since they always support there companies and there exclusive's ( even tho their marketing sucked but there fixing that ) look at LBP without sony's support media molecule wouldn't have delivered a fantastic and extremely well done game and wouldn't have won studio of the year or PS3 game of the year

  • i still play golden eye with my cousin and its still really fun

  • same lol

  • Goldeneye is amazing!

  • yeah rare needs to be partners with anyone but fuckin microsoft no offense but rare really needs to be with nintendo or even sony like u said cus if rare cant find a way to use their own series they can build on nintendo's francises like donkey kong plus rare is best at making kid friendly games and theres not a huge market for that on xbox, nuts and bolts despite its strange concept would have sold better on the wii its not just that rare kicked ass on n64

    why not wii too?

  • actually Rare can make a adult game they did make Killer Instinct and Perfect Dark

  • i know but they don't, killer instinct, perfect dark and conker dont forget that one, were all great but rare is reluctant to make sequels (ok im on video review of PD zero) but besides PD none of them had sequels (ok killer instinct too) but what i mean rare isnt what they once were, golden eye was great because it proved n64 could have great shooters

    and adult games and it changed they way we played them

    NAB doesnt bring back platformers, and PD zero was just another shooter on the xbox

  • this game sucked sooooo bad first game i got 2 =(

  • hitler

  • this game sucks...would much rather ut3 or tf2...MUCH RATHER

  • Err, this was released far before ut3 or tf2, this was one of the first 360 games.

  • Do people still play this game online?

  • with halo 3, cod4/5 and gears of war 2...i highly doubt it

  • Worth the money

  • honestly the single player sucked but the multiplayer kicked ass

  • man i thought this game was a BIG let down. i'd much rather play the N64 version and tbh i thought the reviewer was way too generous. the character models look like they were made for a cartoon, the guns might look nice but theyr all pretty boring cos they didn't keep the best ones, the vehicles sucked compared to halo's and the list goes on, seriously i would NOT recommend buying this game

  • I actually owned the game, and ur right about everything. This game was so damn easy to beat, and a major let down. Im disappointed in rare for making Perfect Dark a pile of dog shit cuz of this. If they make another one, they better not fuck it up.

  • I don't know who the review was done by, but i think it's IGN dudes cause i got the vid off of IGN.

    Yeah that's probably a good clue..

  • LOL YEAH MAN.

  • COOL

  • I got my Xbox 360 for Christmas. And this was my very 1st game i got for it. And too this day i still play it cas i find its one of the best games made

  • stafax,in the video it even shows him holding a grenade without any weapon,also i only had a grenade one day,no weapons,only my grenade

  • wish my copy still wasnt broken

  • i just bought this game for like 6 dollars

  • GAWD! 2 Many First person shooter nowadays!

  • dude any game that allows you to play a hot girl and kill a bunch of guys with big ass guns regardless of story plot has to be good.

  • This game is good. But not awesome!

  • I don't really like this game.

  • Does this game hav a good story?

    (I'm asking to the actual fans)

  • This game really doesn't seem nearly as bad as some people make it out to be. There are times where I wonder if I am the only person who didn't really care all that much for PD64's storyline or voice acting, honestly...

  • After what Halo 2 did to Xbox, going to this game just felt like a step backwards. Halo 2 you can jump, throw a grenade while holding any weapon (unless dual wielding) and it just had a simple and solid experience. Then I went to this and you can't jump, inventory management was odd, you can only throw a grenade if you have a hand gun plus grenades take up a slot as a weapon. All these little things just made the game play feel outdated from day one.

  • My suggestion, get the N64 game instead.

  • Looks pretty good, to me. I'm still getting caught up on all the top tier titles for 360, though, so it'll be a while before I pick this up.

  • when he mentioned 60fps.. i dont really care about how fast a game is.. i dont really notice these things.

  • me too unless it's slow and ugly. then i notice it.

  • i think this game is better than what they said

  • the guns make zero damage in this game

  • No. this game is all about mastering the controls and getting insanely good at headshots, and thats a good thing because it really divides the the pro's from the noobs, unlike Halo 2 and 3 for instance.

  • The IGN watermark is in the bottom right hand corner of the screen, so I presume its by them.

  • that's what i thought, because i got it off of IGN, but i was wondering what staff memeber did the voiceover, or if it was only one staff member's thoughts.

  • Ahhh right. You're right, usually it says the name of the reviewer.

    What did you think of the review? I'm kinda dissapointed by how it sounds, I'd have thought this much time in development would have led to some serious A.I advances at least and that seems to be where this game lacks.

    Multiplayer sounds intense though!

  • Charles Onyett did the review. It shows his name in the beginning of the review.

  • 1st one was a lot better it got a 9.9 but this still kicks ass

  • duh

  • It's a review.

  • duh

  • from ign duh

  • duhhhhh 5 months later

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more