Added: 8 months ago
From: FoxNewsInsider
Views: 1,480
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (113)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Shouldn't you be busy bitching about WWF wrestling you stupid, bearded, child sodomizing papist faggot?

  • Cut, Cap & Balance is a cop-out. It gives congressmen an excuse to not do their job. It is Congress' job to balance the budget. We don't need an Amendment to do it for them.Grow up!

  • oh my freaking god thats my uncle no joke!

  • It's all just a very convenient defense mechanism against that period of the year... THE SLOW NEWS SEASON!

  • They found NOTHING! LMAO!!!!!!! They fear Palin....

  • The commie Weiner sucking media has jizz all over their face.

  • The more the left and the media hates Sarah Palin, the more I like her!

  • @CorrosionX3 . You know, the left hates slavery and war.. I hope you don't use this poorly thought out methodology to make all your decisions.

  • @blackadm Not necessarily, but I sure enjoy the way she does it.

  • @CorrosionX3 does what?

  • @blackadm She lets them expose their liberal bias and irrational hatred for her, and they end up looking like clowns.

  • @CorrosionX3 not true. She does everything she can to try to control public perception. Her desire is to get the media to cover her in a good light. She has failed so far because of her inability to say "I don't know" when she doesn't know the answer to a question. She is responsible for her own blundering. This can't be blamed on the media.

  • @blackadm She knew from the beginning that as a beautiful conservative women, she would never get treated fairly by the biased liberal media. She uses this to her advantage. Maybe you just don't see strategy.

  • @CorrosionX3 She is paranoid about her public perception and never takes responsibility for her mistakes. This does not work in her favor because she has to insert herself into the public eye to try to control her media coverage and then makes it worse for herself. She is the sole contributor to her never ending spiral of poor coverage, because she is an ignorant person, who needs to take her place alongside Andrew Dice Clay and Omarosa as a contestant on the Apprentice.That is her stock.

  • @blackadm That's your opinion....and you know what they say about opinions....

  • @blackadm

    Are you serious?!? Sarah never thought the leftist media would ever cover her "in a good light". No constitution loving American wants that. It would be the ultimate insult.

  • @qpwillie spare me the hyperbole. If she thought that she should have stayed the fuck home.

  • @blackadm

    Nobody should stay home just because of what the leftist media wants to do. They wish they had that much power.

    "PDS" is Palin Derangement Syndrome. You don't get out much, do you? ........... Hmmmm, maybe the leftist media corps is making you stay home. ROTFL!!!!!!

  • @qpwillie what does the leftist media want to do besides make money? You don't know how this works? Ratings=$. That's it. How that relates to Palin is that she is a moron who makes a spectacle of herself. We like to watch spectacles. That translates into $ for the media. The same reason Jersey Shore is on. If she was a proper and dignified woman,who knew how to conduct herself and when to be quiet, like Hilary Clinton, she wouldn't have this problem. And she can always choose to stay home.

  • @blackadm

    Sarah doesn't have a problem. What are you talking about?

    So Hillary Clinton is a "proper and dignified woman"? Now you're trying to be a comedian.

  • @blackadm

    Hillary is a bitter old man hater due to the fact she was an unpopular, pathetic dork throughout her school years. The only person she ever admired was her Marxist college professor whose personality she has been trying to assume ever since. She latched onto Bill because he was easy to manipulate and she has pushed him through the political process so she can ride along to hopefully obtain the power to punish the country she blames for her pitiful life.

  • @qpwillie HDS? you are clearly and sadly afflicted. lol.

  • @blackadm

    Nope, I just research these people to a hilt. I have loads of text files in a group of folders. When someone on YouTube posts a video about Hillary, you'll see a normal amount of comments. When someone posts a video about Sarah Palin, most of them have hateful comments flowing in so fast you have to turn off the automatic updates to even read part of them.

    People with PDS even blamed Sarah for the Arizona shootings. Now that pretty much tells the tale.

  • @qpwillie I see. It's a conspiracy. The Bilderberg group with the help of the socialist media and "they" who have PDS are all working in unison to get some overinflated sportcaster whose celebrity is as relevant and important as octo-mom.

    Or maybe the public recognizes she has no place in the public eye and is just booing her to get off the stage and she is too stupid to take the hint.

  • @blackadm

    You sure give her a lot of attention for somebody who is irrelevant.

    Jessy Jackson is irrelevant. That's why most of us pretty much ignore him.

  • @qpwillie lots of people who are irrelevant get attention. Snookie from Jersey shore for example. or Gary Busey. You know, people who make spectacles of themselves because they are useless otherwise.

  • @blackadm

    Sorry. I have no idea who either of those two people are. If they're some of those Hollywood socialists, I have no interest in them. They don't get any of my money.

    I'm sure I haven't seen people attacking, slamming and slandering them and their entire families like they constantly do to Sarah. When do you suppose the entire leftist media be digging through Snookie and Gary Busey's emails like a bunch of crazed necrophiles?

  • @blackadm

    I never said I research every actor and TV personality. I realize that leftists see no difference but I was talking about people who actually have an effect on the country and the world.

  • @qpwillie no, you are talking about Palin, a tv personality, who has as much effect on the world as the rehash of Hawaii 5-0. Now, I realize that her talking points, being spoonfed to her by Fox, make it seem that she is in tune with subjects that are important to the public, but her regurgitations of whatever Hannity said last night don't have any impact beyond the saturation of the subject by the guys at the top who set the agenda. Her ability to parrot is actually quite inconsequential.

  • @blackadm

    And still you bust your butt looking for an opportunity to trash her, the entire leftist press corps puts aside everything else to follow her up and down the road and solicit the general public to help them dig through her emails hoping to find something that might destroy her. (They would be praying to find something except that leftists can't believe there could possibly be something greater than themselves.)

  • @qpwillie no, actually. I don't have to try at all. She makes it quite easy. I am having trouble understanding something, though. Can you define "the entire leftist press corps" and tell me who that exactly includes? You keep saying it over and over but it has no meaning... just a soundbyte to summon an emotional understanding. I've noticed that people who use it don't really know what they mean or how the media works. They are typically victims of groupthink.

  • @blackadm

    I seriously doubt you would be capable of recognizing the leftist media because you just listen to them and take everything they say without question. That's why when you hear something form Fox News, you automatically that Fox is the one who is wrong.

    So, Sarah hangs around your house and forces you to find her videos on YouTube and listen to MSNBC attack her. I don't have that problem. She never drops by here so I'm able to find plenty of time to give my attention to things.

  • @blackadm

    For decades, the left had completely taken over the broadcast media. Most people knew it but didn't know anything to do about it. Many important events happened that never got reported. The things that did get reported were greatly slanted to favor the left. That's why Fox News was created. It's also why all the others have been in steady decline ever since. At this time, Fox News has a larger audience than any three of the others.

  • @qpwillie paranoid and delusional claims with no substantiating evidence.

    "The left" is a made up label to villianize Fox's competition in the industry. That is why it is inclusive of all networks but Fox, and why you cannot give clear and specific examples, because there are none. Just a made up boogey-man to keep you all dependant on a company whose real business is to sell you gold, tax software and disaster insurance. They're an ad comapny that uses politics to get your attention.

  • @blackadm Why don't you actually give names to 3 of the others and we'll see how your audience claim stacks up?

  • @blackadm

    Here's a good indicator. If a media outlet demands to go through somebody's emails and they have never, ever, in ALL existence, never, forever back through time, ever done it to anybody else, you can be pretty sure it's a leftist propaganda agent.

  • @qpwillie what media outlet did that? None that I am aware of. And your assertion that such an outlet necessarily must be a leftist propaganda agent is a non sequitor. Get it together. You're flailing here.

  • @blackadm

    EVERY leftist media outlet did that. Not law enforcement; they weren't interested in it.

    BTW, when you see a media outlet personality saying he feels a thrill going up his leg when Obama speaks, you are safe to bet that's a leftist propaganda agency.

  • @qpwillie no national media outlet demanded her emails be released. It was an independant watchdog acting within his legal right and duty. When the state made them available, did MSNBC request a copy? You betcha.

    But no, a single talking head giving his own personal opinion is not a safe bet that he is acting beyond his own behalf and certainly isn't a strategic move from the top of any organization.

  • @blackadm

    Oh, and I'm sorry. I didn't realize that you have a problem with English. A "minority" means less than half of the total.

  • @qpwillie A minority of "what" is the question. You claim that "you leftists"(which you haven't established what that exactly means or how I fit in) are in the minority, but you haven't said of what. Pretending that I don't understand the definition of a minority is pretty weak. If you can't answer the question just say so. Don't fucking red herring me. What are leftists the minority of? people who watch pro wrestling? People who own Hummers? You have no point if there isn't a point of reference

  • @blackadm

    In any normal context, Practically everybody would have understood that I was talking about a minority of the American people.

    To sum it up, leftists want to "fundamentally transform the United States of America". Rightists want to "fundamentally restore the United States of America". Leftists believe in "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Rightists believe in equal opportunity, not guaranteed equal results.

  • @qpwillie Oh, well then I agree. Leftists are a minority. As well as rightists. The majority are in the middle and like the idea of retrofitting, where we take the beauty of the old and necessity of the new so our system is efficient and practical for our 21st century needs. "Restoration" also requires transformation.

    BTW, when you say "fundamentally restore" what I hear is the revocation of women's rights to vote and blacks rights to own property. Which is better how?

  • @blackadm

    I see evidence of someone influenced with this new "revised" version of history. I don't believe there was a time when blacks couldn't own property. I know there were many blacks who owned blacks throughout the slavery period. NO, I'M NOT ADVOCATING SLAVERY. (I knew that would be your next claim.)

    "Fundamentally transform" is a totally different term which does not imply fixing things that need to be fixed. It also takes on another meaning when you isolate one of the two words.

  • @qpwillie eh... Dred Scott v. Sanford? the Black Codes as a response to the 13th amendment? the necessity of the 14th amendment ring a bell? Funny how you accuse ME of adhering to a revised version of history.

    Here you are, trying to give me a history lesson and completely unaware of some of the most fundamental epochs marking our advancement as a country. I mean, this is grade school, Paul Revere stuff....

    I hope you don't homeschool.

  • @blackadm

    So you just want to tear the country down from the foundation and create a new type of country? That's what "fundamentally transform" means. I'm sure your Harvard scholar hero in the white house knows exactly what it means.

  • @qpwillie no, sir. You've assumed this whole time that I am one of these boogeymen you fear. But I've given no indication that should make you think so. The country needing to be fundamentally transformed means different things to different people. As Americans we don't fit into these nice broad categories of "us" and "them." The real villians are those that would have you think this to be the issue so they can hand you an entire ideology with one simple label. It does'nt work that way, though.

  • @blackadm

    "Fundamental" comes form the SAME root word as "foundation".

    "Transform" means to recreate into something totally different. It's part of the English language. It means ONE THING and that's fundamentally transform.

  • @qpwillie do you have a point?

  • @qpwillie And I don't have any heros. I am my own hero. Obama is just another man. He is well educated and that is admirable and necessary for his job, but he is neither my councelor or advisor. I choose where I stand on a case by case basis. And I am not going to sit here and defend everything he does, except by allowing him to make mistakes occassionally because he is only human. This, to me, is a more worthy position rather than pretending he is faultless the way Palin is treated by her fans.

  • @blackadm

    I don't think you know anything about Obama prior to his run for president.

    His stated heroes at Columbia said "Hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government with a flood of impossible demands thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse."

    Now picture a series of historically gigantic bills which "must be passed immediately to save the economy".

  • @qpwillie It doesn't matter what you think, because you don't know. I'm from Illinois. I saw him debate Alan Keyes live. I predicted he would be president long before he was on the national radar.

    Oh, and the Cloward-Pivon myth has been debunked.

  • @blackadm

    Obama's history of "questionable activities goes back to long before he arrived in Illinois. However, it was in Chicago where he publicly expressed his disdain for the constitution.

    No, the Cloward - Piven Thing has not been "debunked". Only in leftist blogs. The fact is, Frances Fox Piven still pays her visits to the white house.

  • @qpwillie Look, whatever proboem you have with Obama, you'll have to take up with him. I'm not his rep and it is not my job to knock down all the strawmen you are likely to set up or to explain how Piven's visit when Clinton was in office can give no indication that Obama is implementing a Cloward-Piven strategy. If you are fine with employing faulty logic in order to believe what you want, that's your own ignorance, and has no bearing on me.

  • @blackadm

    Those historically gigantic bills were passed against the will of 65% of the people by congress slithering around in locked back rooms in the wee hours, making bribes and threats. Bills which congress admittedly didn't even know what's contained in them. ...And Obama either didn't know what's in them or he lied through his teeth about them ... or both. Of course, lying is what he does best.

  • @qpwillie and now you are guilty of false attribution and slander, with no way to even remotely demonstrate your claims.

    The only way to determine how accurate you are is by inference through how accurate you have been in the past. And you have been doing pretty shitty so far, not even knowing that blacks couldn't own property. Now you're just throwing anything out there hoping something will stick. Why don't you tell me that 9/11 was an inside job, next?

  • @blackadm

    The Dred Scott decision stated that slaves and their descendants were not protected by the constitution but blacks still owned property. That one has already been restored anyway.

    The "9/11 truthers" are leftists who want to carry the "it's all Bush's fault" tactic one step further.

  • @qpwillie whatever makes you sleep better at night...

  • @blackadm

    My claims of how congress crammed those bills down the throats of the American people are publicly reported, common knowledge. The results of which were things like the "cornhusker kickback", the Louisiana purchase", et al.

  • @qpwillie what bills are you even talking about?

  • @blackadm

    Sarah doesn't request any of this. It's ALL driven by an uncommon hatred and fear that one little soccer mom from Alaska might somehow be able to reinstate our constitution and turn the government back over to the people where it was intended to be.

  • @qpwillie Sure, cause that's reasonable... she's quaint and underqualified with the most basic of skillsets but can still turn our government on it's head? with talking points? You are sincerely confused.. If she has this power, she is welcome to use it anytime.

  • @blackadm

    The left and the right have been around far longer than Fox News. I can give you several examples but what good will it do? If it agrees with you, you'll think it's just normal. If it doesn't, you'll just say Fox News has something to do with it. It's for the same reason you leftists can't accept the fact that you're in the minority. You'll never understand that concept.

    -

    CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, ... all those that were around before anybody was competing with them.

  • @qpwillie you're kidding, right? CNN has only been around since 1980. MSNBC is a partnership between Microsoft and NBC from 1996. News Corp (Fox News)? 1979. ABC, CBS and NBC have no leftist association or agenda.

    And your claim that "leftists are in the minority" has no meaning/reference. Minority of what? If this is another audience reference, CNN is the ratings leader when it comes to hard news. So your conspiracy theory and egocentric puffery is fizzled.

  • @blackadm

    If Hillary hadn't came along, Bill would be a sleazy ambulance chaser in Hope Arkansas.

  • @qpwillie *facepalm

  • Palin is a Connnn just like Tricky Dick was in his days

  • These emails were requested 3 YEARS AGO. Palin managed to hide them and it took three years for the under-educated Alaskan hillbilly to destroy the evidence. You probably won't find any emails relating to the time when she was blowing Brad Hanson. Or about Bristol giving birth and Sarah claiming the baby was hers. Emails related to Troopergate won't be their either. It took her three years to finally get rid of anything that would show her for what she is. A piece of hillbilly trash.

  • I think the NEWS / Media need to take their heads out their ass and do their jobs right... fair

  • The media will do ANYTHING to destroy Palin.......

  • @MetalDetroit they don't have to try very hard. All they have to do is show up and she does the rest.

  • Will Obama's / Pelosi's / Weiner's email be next?

  • Does the bias and incompetency of the American Press make your blood boil?

    Media Puts Palin Emails Under Microscope- Yet Ignore Obama’s Missing Records

    by Sheri Urban –

    I wonder why the NY Times, Washington Post and LA Times have not hired any staff to look into the information that is completely unknown about Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. You know, little things like…

    * Punahou School records

    * Occidental College records

    * Columbia College records

    * Columbia Thesis paper

  • @Jonah42946 The two aren't comparable. School records are priveleged. Her public office communications are public property. That is why.

  • @blackadm My children had to provide college transcripts in order to get a job but no, not Obama. He refuses to present any and all records to a court of law. What about... * Passport records * Complete medical records (not a 2008 brief) * Illinois Bar Records * Illinois State Senate records * Illinois State Senate schedule * Law practice client list * Harvard Law Review articles that were published * Emails as State Senator * Emails as U.S. Senator WHAT IS HE HIDING?
  • @Jonah42946 I'm sorry. I don't think these are requirements written in the constitution to be president. In fact, I know they're not. He has no legal reason to be compelled to do so. If you want Obama's emails from when he was a senator, I suggest you look into the FOIA of Illinois, and pay the thousands of dollars in fees necessary to obtain them. His bar record and client list are irrelevant, unless you are a legal firm and he is applying for a job as a lawyer.

  • Bozo is OUTRAGED! Gee, that's unusual.

  • Leftists never fail to be repulsive gangsters.

  • Comment removed

  • Good!!! long live The New World Order!

  • @ratt7777

    Sarah Palin has outsmarted you all. She has the entire leftist press corps following her up and down the road like a bunch of starved puppies waiting for a crumb and grumbling about it all the way. The woman is a genius.

    She didn't win in 2008 because she wasn't running for anything. In America, we don't vote for the vice president.

  • @qpwillie I suppose Paris Hilton is a genious, too? Being an attention whore is what stupid girls do. Not geniuses.

  • @blackadm

    You people who suffer from PDS will find a way to justify your hatred, no matter how ridiculous you have to get to do so.

    When a certain Boston history professor found that Sarah was correct about Paul Revere, down to the fine details, he could find no way around it so he just concluded that Paul Revere was lying in his letter.

    It's very sad but extremely amazing.

  • @qpwillie you people? I am not a part of whatever group you have aligned yourself against. And I am familiar with Prof. Allison's claims, which he does not say that she was correct down to the fine detail. Only that her lining up the march to Concord as a 2nd amendment issue was partially right. Revere never fired his gun or rang any bells. I've read the letter. Throwing half-truths at a dart board and going along with whatever seems to stick isn't accurate, honest, or the sign of a genius.

  • @qpwillie no. Palin said he (Revere) was firing those shots and ringing those bells.... which is wrong. She was not accurate at all. His ride was done in secret and he was not given charge to say anything to the Brits and only did so after being captured. Her account was wrong even though she had plenty of opportunity to prepare before she arrived.

  • @blackadm

    My original point was about your PDS with which you are clearly and sadly afflicted. ..And yes, you people who share the affliction.

  • @qpwillie wtf is PDS? If it means that I oppose revisionist history and people who don't acknowledge their mistakes, then sure. The point is that she is just another undereducated American who is sloppy in her understanding of history and politics. Pretty average. You could get the same skill-set from an average Kohl's shopper. This type of midwest hero worship is common. Roseanne Barre? Gretchen Wilson? It's all irrelevant to me until you start literally rewriting history to glorify her.

  • Maybe Piers Morgan should go back home. I hear his show is failing anyway.

  • @topthickproducer

    Thank God for Fox News!!!!!! The country needs to see just how sleazy the leftists are. This looks like they've sunk just about as low as it gets but I've said that many times before and they always prove me wrong by sinking lower.

  • @qpwillie You assume I am a 'leftist', well you are wrong. I don't support LAME DEMS or UNDERHANDED REPUBS. But Palin is an enrich-herself-by-lying-to-foo­ls BITCH.

    And you can't deny that. Besides, I don't care about anything revealed in this information. The best strategy is to ignore her.

  • @topthickproducer

    I can deny it until you can come up with something she has lied about. ..and show some evidence that she lied.

  • @qpwillie You are such a troll. Remember the Bridge to Nowhere.

    First she was for it, then she said she was never for it.

    Is that a lie or what. You make it too easy for me to prove she is a liar.

    But definitely she is an enrich-herself-by-lying-to-foo­­ls BITCH.

    And you are one of them fools

  • @topthickproducer

    You didn't show anything she lied about. You brought up an issue where she changed her mind after seeing how things were developing. That shows character.

    On the other hand, your mighty Obama has lied every time he speaks.

  • @topthickproducer ---------------- Lies by Obama: Would have the most transparent administration in History. No “boots” on the ground Libya. The health care bill will not increase the deficit by one dime. If you like the health care plan you have you can keep it. We have run out of places in the US to drill for oil. Health Care deals will be covered on C-span. No Earmarks in the $787 Billion Stimulus. --------- I could do this all day. Let me know if you want more.
  • @qpwillie Again, you assume, I am a leftist. Which makes an ass of u and me.

    Not supporting 'IDIOT' Palin, does not mean I support Obama.

    I agree with all the lies you describe about Obama. I did no vote for him, and I

    said it , he is a corporate president.. At this time I only support Ron Paul.

    Not ignorant hillbillies like Palin. Keep your adorable idiot for yourself.

  • @topthickproducer

    You accused Sarah of being a liar and you can't back it up.

    Ron Paul came from the Appalachian Mountains in Pennsylvania. He's a "hillbilly" if there ever was one. Maybe you should rethink your bigotry.

  • Is that all the bias they have? Watch FOX for 30 seconds at any given time and there's more bias than that.

  • Yes, it would be much more useful to the nation if we released Obama's e-mails.

  • It is simply amazing that this woman has sop much power over the media and the left.

  • 50% of Americans identify themselves with the Tea Party?? Back that up. What's the source, please? I love how people of FOX News never offers up a source for the numbers they give. 50%? Give me a break.

  • @hanslute It's any of the people who see that unemployment flies up just as face as gas prices do. It's any of those people who notice that 78M Americans will lose their health coverage by 2014 because of Obama Care. People frustrated with a president who lied to them and said that unemployment wouldn't go past 8% if he let us quadruple the Bush spending, that the health care negotiations would be held on CSPAN, and that if you liked your current health care, you could keep it. LIES.

  • @hanslute

    Actually, the valid indicators show that it's more like 65% who either participate directly or support the actions of the tea party movement.

    You can check the 2010 election results. We took the house and the only reason we didn't take the senate is because only two thirds of them were up for reelection. We'll get them in 2012.

  • @qpwillie Can you provide me some kind of link to a 'valid indicator' that shows 65% participate in the Tea Party, or support their actions?

    Google the words, "gallup poll tea party demographics"--the top link is to a March 2011 Gallup poll where people were asked if they considered themselves a supporter of the Tea Party. The result was 28%, which isn't even half of your 65% number. Where are you getting this 65% number? I've provided you with my indicator. What's your 'valid indicator'?

  • Leftist Torquemadas...

  • they should do this to obama

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more