oh and btw the 2ms is not referring to input lag not response time. I still have to see the first monitor that specifies its input lag, because it is frame and resolution dependant. In my tests the NEC is outperforming the iiyama although the NEC is stating 5ms resp. time against the iiyamas 2ms...
in games, its the lag that matters, not the pixel response time
I just want to add that both monitors dont feel laggy when playing. The 'smoothness' however is still not CRT like, but I guess that will never be the case
CRT is iiyama visionmaster pro 510 22", LCD 1 = NEC EA241WM and LCD 2 was IIYAMA 22" ProLite E2209HDS-B1
the iiyama has an average of 12ms inputlag, the nec performed a little better with average 8ms inputlag.
I have taken about 40 pictures for each test and made averages (not all were readable, about 50% was readable) the tests were done using a splitter cable, not in clone mode.
It's not nerdy, input lag bothers people across all fields, sports, movies, games, music, word processing Lol anything, companies cut corners with cheap electronics and use false advertising that's why people go into detail about it (:
it is nerdy! I use cheap monitors at my college, i use a cheap monitor for gaming! I even use it for my xbox and watching movies, it makes no difference!
Its your camera dumbshit. You should do a video with you moving it on the other display, and the results would be the same. Reasearch a little, and get a better camera for god's sake.
Yours is 8ms response time for the pixels to change from grey-to-grey. Whereas input lag is the delay between the processing of the images from the GPU to them being displayed on the screen.
I'm not saying I'm wrong, I just got other things to do than leave comments, like maybe going to work, or spending time with family, not arguing. I'm sorry, but if having an argument is your idea of a good time, then I cannot help you.
The dell monitors DO LAG significantly,I have a dell 2408WFP and its a little better than the previous 2407WFP but it still lags alot, gaming on the one sucks, period, ofcourse unless we want to be owned all the time.
I stick to CRT for games when the edge matters. ofcourse playing against someone on a dell, you can beat em hands down with any 2ms TN panel lol
you are full of shit tbone. I game on a 2407 and you can't tell the difference from a fp2001. More than likely you have a shit card. There is no way in hell a human can detect a .01 second lag. Hell, you have built in lag from the bus communicating with the video card.
Anyone that mentions they have a CRT for the "edge" is pure bullshit.
shikerul you are making quite a fool of yourself, but it's a free world :)
there really is a big difference between pixel reponse time and input lag. .
but it looks like these concepts are too complex for you to grasp, so I have a tip for you: hook up a CRT with a vga splitter next to your slow ass dell and you will get the same laggy result as in the video below
checkout youtube vid /watch?v=pi2OE6hSh00
sorry if you bought the dell for gaming, but you made the wrong choice, happy laggin
There are reflexes in the human body at less than .01, and while it's true that we can't react that fast i.e. event->reaction we can still synchronize at .01 or feel desynced-ness, i.e. there are music games with 12ms timing windows etc.
Have you compared your CRT and your 2ms panel? I heard a typical (minimum) lag is 16.7ms or 33.3ms (1 or 2 frames at 60hz) and the 2ms is false advertising can someone verify this?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
These videos are so retarded!!!
Did you even TRY to move the window while on the DELL screen instead? Its the video card lagging.. NOT the monitor. The video card has to process both sides moving the window on 1 monitor.
Sigh, I was quite interested in this monitor but not after seeing this. I'm not a massive gamer these days but do like to FPS at times, and that would kill it for me. Looks like the mouse would act somewhat like it was attached via elastic bands to [that which is being controlled].
Even worse is I'm coming of a 21" CRT so the difference would be even more stoopid than that Viewsonic.
Uncool. So I guess I need to shop around some more now
It seems the Dell 2408WFP are using a "scaler" so the input lag are very visible... ummm I am not going to buy this 2408 thing, too stupid in design in terms of usage...
i have the 2408wfp, and I have to say it has the nicest display i have ever seen in contrast and color. I have not noticed any lag, i'd like to know which kind of plug his using on both monitors. This is the only monitor i have seen that has a display that seems to be perfectly calibrated from the beginning and a very powerfull display in terms of how bright and dark it goes. I dunno what your talking about with the desig, the sharp monitors have the most un-annoying design there is. :P
ya. but i just ate a raman noodle packet with no water. then i thought I could eat some of the seasoning from the little packet right after i bit a chunck of the noodle brick off. It was a bad idea in the end. cause the noodles were all hard so my tounge didn't touch the powder to the roof of my mouth. So when i breathed in, it shot a bunch of loose, chicken flavored, HIGHLY potent flavor powder down my throat. I coughed for ever... and each cough was this wierd chicked flavored hell..
No, this is just how S-PVA works. You get good colors for a decent price, but high input lag. Perfect for people who works with photos or just use it as a every day desktop / workstation / .., crappy for FPS gamers. Probably ok for MMORPG and such.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah very bad in what way? this response time makes no difference in fps because if you have ever pinged a website it takes about 100ms depending on where you live to get to the website and back so your not going to have an advantage if your monitor has a lower response time because its still gunna take about 200ms before you get that head shot and there's 1000 milliseconds. Those who really get into their games don't give a damn about response time as long as the image quality is good.
Your talking about how fast data is sent during an fps game.
if another player is lagging only his character will be skipping across the screen, not the whole game.
what i am talking about is if the response time of the monitor is too slow...you will have problems with the controls...you will get a delay like in the video above.
Is it my eyes or do you have the dreaded red tint on your dell 2408? I ordered the 2408 the day they were officially released and noticed half the screen is brighter and there is a slight red tint, tons of other people have this problem. Not cool for $700
Notice how much brighter the Dell LCD is? With MVA panels the pixel response time rises dramatically with an increase in brightness, so to do a comparison you have to put the monitors at the same brightness...
how can be awarded of this "feature" (lol) before buy ? :P
foxycorredor 7 months ago
what are the response times for those models?
JaredProject 1 year ago
WOW really impresionant!!!
AGSystem27 1 year ago
different resolutions is all, quite obvious. your comparing proggressive against interlaced. p will win all the time.
ListresS2 1 year ago
oh and btw the 2ms is not referring to input lag not response time. I still have to see the first monitor that specifies its input lag, because it is frame and resolution dependant. In my tests the NEC is outperforming the iiyama although the NEC is stating 5ms resp. time against the iiyamas 2ms...
in games, its the lag that matters, not the pixel response time
tbonesixtynine 2 years ago
@tbonesixtynine
thats not at all true because you change dirrections faster. therefore you take less damage.
carniverouslady 1 year ago
I just want to add that both monitors dont feel laggy when playing. The 'smoothness' however is still not CRT like, but I guess that will never be the case
tbonesixtynine 2 years ago
@NicolXIX
I have just done some extensive testing
CRT is iiyama visionmaster pro 510 22", LCD 1 = NEC EA241WM and LCD 2 was IIYAMA 22" ProLite E2209HDS-B1
the iiyama has an average of 12ms inputlag, the nec performed a little better with average 8ms inputlag.
I have taken about 40 pictures for each test and made averages (not all were readable, about 50% was readable) the tests were done using a splitter cable, not in clone mode.
tbonesixtynine 2 years ago
input lag, I have a dell monitor and it does not bother me at all!
IMHO if you are going into detail such as input lag or etc this is just beyond nerdy!!!
And i only watched it to find out what a input lag test looks like
imunreal 2 years ago
@imunreal
It's not nerdy, input lag bothers people across all fields, sports, movies, games, music, word processing Lol anything, companies cut corners with cheap electronics and use false advertising that's why people go into detail about it (:
NicolXIX 2 years ago
@NicolXIX
it is nerdy! I use cheap monitors at my college, i use a cheap monitor for gaming! I even use it for my xbox and watching movies, it makes no difference!
imunreal 2 years ago
Its your camera dumbshit. You should do a video with you moving it on the other display, and the results would be the same. Reasearch a little, and get a better camera for god's sake.
MaestroBLC 2 years ago
@MaestroBLC 64ms Input lag is VERY noticeable.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
@LessthanJake14 mine is only 8ms, rev a03. idk wat ur talking about.
MaestroBLC 2 years ago
Input lag =/= response time...
Yours is 8ms response time for the pixels to change from grey-to-grey. Whereas input lag is the delay between the processing of the images from the GPU to them being displayed on the screen.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
@MaestroBLC congratiolations, you are an true idiot
MarkQP 2 years ago
W/E, I'm not gonna argue anymore on this topic, its too old.
MaestroBLC 2 years ago
@MaestroBLC lag is increasing and games are getting faster, this topic is fresh, not old.
NicolXIX 2 years ago
I'm saying that the original comment was left a while ago, and now I have things to do.
MaestroBLC 2 years ago
@MaestroBLC other things are boring.
MarkQP 2 years ago
@MaestroBLC you can also just admit your wrong, you know?
MarkQP 2 years ago
I'm not saying I'm wrong, I just got other things to do than leave comments, like maybe going to work, or spending time with family, not arguing. I'm sorry, but if having an argument is your idea of a good time, then I cannot help you.
MaestroBLC 2 years ago
The dell monitors DO LAG significantly,I have a dell 2408WFP and its a little better than the previous 2407WFP but it still lags alot, gaming on the one sucks, period, ofcourse unless we want to be owned all the time.
I stick to CRT for games when the edge matters. ofcourse playing against someone on a dell, you can beat em hands down with any 2ms TN panel lol
tbonesixtynine 2 years ago
you are full of shit tbone. I game on a 2407 and you can't tell the difference from a fp2001. More than likely you have a shit card. There is no way in hell a human can detect a .01 second lag. Hell, you have built in lag from the bus communicating with the video card.
Anyone that mentions they have a CRT for the "edge" is pure bullshit.
shikerui 2 years ago
shikerul you are making quite a fool of yourself, but it's a free world :)
there really is a big difference between pixel reponse time and input lag. .
but it looks like these concepts are too complex for you to grasp, so I have a tip for you: hook up a CRT with a vga splitter next to your slow ass dell and you will get the same laggy result as in the video below
checkout youtube vid /watch?v=pi2OE6hSh00
sorry if you bought the dell for gaming, but you made the wrong choice, happy laggin
tbonesixtynine 2 years ago
actualy the 2407 has like 40+ms input lag which is alot. on 60 fps that would make for 2-3 frames or worse.
Muscleduck 2 years ago
@shikerui
There are reflexes in the human body at less than .01, and while it's true that we can't react that fast i.e. event->reaction we can still synchronize at .01 or feel desynced-ness, i.e. there are music games with 12ms timing windows etc.
NicolXIX 2 years ago
@tbonesixtynine
Have you compared your CRT and your 2ms panel? I heard a typical (minimum) lag is 16.7ms or 33.3ms (1 or 2 frames at 60hz) and the 2ms is false advertising can someone verify this?
NicolXIX 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These videos are so retarded!!!
Did you even TRY to move the window while on the DELL screen instead? Its the video card lagging.. NOT the monitor. The video card has to process both sides moving the window on 1 monitor.
LRN2UNDERSTAND computer mechanics.
BGZDurel 2 years ago
no, you failed ;/ Input lag is causing this. rendering 2d doesnt take video card even 0.1 ms time so it doesnt make any difference.
Ballero0 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this comparison is bullshit
fl89 2 years ago
Bullshit because you own the Dell and don't want to believe the results? Too bad.
YukonTrooper 2 years ago 13
you're right zaffle, the A01 was supposed to correct that input lag problem but I haven't found any official nor any posts to confirm that.
I also heard that a A02 revision was available.
Can anybody confirm that the input lag issue has been fixed with the A01 or A02 revision ?
carambaroz 2 years ago
Most people seem to be confusing input lag and ghosting. I suggest googling around before posting rush comments.
VoxAcies 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow Dell monitor is EPIC FAIL. Who buys that American shit lol.
footlover5 3 years ago
lol fuck yuz
liedsonpl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah...try dragging the window on the dell side......the same thing will happen on the viewsonic...
Deathegg33 3 years ago
lol.
You made my day :)
awelux 3 years ago 3
lol.. XD
Cybercreeps 3 years ago
wat, you fool. the dell is well known to have quite a bad input lag, although supposedly the A01 firmware has fixed this.
zaffle 3 years ago
LOL
bookshelffury 3 years ago
See the Techreport web page podcast--HP LP2475w vs. Dell 2408WFP w/A01 revision.
glen1ster 3 years ago
by the way, have u guys seen the HP w2448hc ?
perfect! webcam, built in speakers, HDMI, USB,..
eerereps 3 years ago
maybe its not the input lag of the monitor, but its the output lag of the graphic card for the second port.
eerereps 3 years ago
I wonder what would happened if he pulled that window on the Dell side.
Elix17 3 years ago 4
Sigh, I was quite interested in this monitor but not after seeing this. I'm not a massive gamer these days but do like to FPS at times, and that would kill it for me. Looks like the mouse would act somewhat like it was attached via elastic bands to [that which is being controlled].
Even worse is I'm coming of a 21" CRT so the difference would be even more stoopid than that Viewsonic.
Uncool. So I guess I need to shop around some more now
wutdaflek 3 years ago
i tested it today. its REALLY HORRIBLE. actions and WoW are completely unplayable for me. fuck. and it seemed to be so perfect.. fuck you, dell! :(
FuNonsens 3 years ago 3
Apparently this has been fixed now..
e1337prodigy 3 years ago
not at all , it's still around 50ms which is awful.
Daclaem 3 years ago
Not at all: I just sent mine back due to the lag in FPS (CS:S to be specific).
bathawes 3 years ago
thanks for making this!
ComdotSSC 3 years ago
It seems the Dell 2408WFP are using a "scaler" so the input lag are very visible... ummm I am not going to buy this 2408 thing, too stupid in design in terms of usage...
kiddjam 3 years ago
i have the 2408wfp, and I have to say it has the nicest display i have ever seen in contrast and color. I have not noticed any lag, i'd like to know which kind of plug his using on both monitors. This is the only monitor i have seen that has a display that seems to be perfectly calibrated from the beginning and a very powerfull display in terms of how bright and dark it goes. I dunno what your talking about with the desig, the sharp monitors have the most un-annoying design there is. :P
InSaneTK 3 years ago
Have you tried switching DVI ports to see if one is dominate over the other? I'd like to know...
Hogbawlz 3 years ago
some people say using a DVI to HDMI adapter significantly reduces the lag, havent tried it yet though
vvrath 3 years ago
I think this tip is for cards that support HDMI and thus can use YCbCr
vvrath 3 years ago
what does that mean, never heard of that... ycbcr?
ComdotSSC 3 years ago
who?! :)
ComdotSSC 3 years ago
viewsonic looks better
TJae1 3 years ago
ya. but i just ate a raman noodle packet with no water. then i thought I could eat some of the seasoning from the little packet right after i bit a chunck of the noodle brick off. It was a bad idea in the end. cause the noodles were all hard so my tounge didn't touch the powder to the roof of my mouth. So when i breathed in, it shot a bunch of loose, chicken flavored, HIGHLY potent flavor powder down my throat. I coughed for ever... and each cough was this wierd chicked flavored hell..
hiPlasma 3 years ago 17
Wonderful, mail us the recipe.
TJae1 3 years ago
That is the best Youtube comment I've ever read. I'd shake you by the hand if i could.
chulk607 3 years ago 5
lol
hiPlasma 3 years ago
Yeah, but that Viewsonic is TN.
spencer248 3 years ago
The ViewSonic VP2030B in NOT a TN panel. It is an MVA...
phivepointzero 3 years ago 3
wow viewsonic rocks
drawingmaniac21 3 years ago 2
No, this is just how S-PVA works. You get good colors for a decent price, but high input lag. Perfect for people who works with photos or just use it as a every day desktop / workstation / .., crappy for FPS gamers. Probably ok for MMORPG and such.
JohanKH 3 years ago 2
actually the video is showing how a slow monitor like the viewsonic vp2030b is even faster than the dell.
the viewsonic has a 16 ms response time. so the dell would be even slower. very bad for fps games.
JohnMactavish 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah very bad in what way? this response time makes no difference in fps because if you have ever pinged a website it takes about 100ms depending on where you live to get to the website and back so your not going to have an advantage if your monitor has a lower response time because its still gunna take about 200ms before you get that head shot and there's 1000 milliseconds. Those who really get into their games don't give a damn about response time as long as the image quality is good.
CrzVids 2 years ago
Your talking about how fast data is sent during an fps game.
if another player is lagging only his character will be skipping across the screen, not the whole game.
what i am talking about is if the response time of the monitor is too slow...you will have problems with the controls...you will get a delay like in the video above.
JohnMactavish 2 years ago 7
You don't know why pros use LAN to play do you?
matsis01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dude, why would you compare a full screen 20 inch monitor with a wide screen 24 inch? Absurd.
kinsolvingfan87 3 years ago
Is it my eyes or do you have the dreaded red tint on your dell 2408? I ordered the 2408 the day they were officially released and noticed half the screen is brighter and there is a slight red tint, tons of other people have this problem. Not cool for $700
mikeyturner777 3 years ago 4
So calibrate it to your likening, you can use adobe gamma if nothing else.
JohanKH 3 years ago
Notice how much brighter the Dell LCD is? With MVA panels the pixel response time rises dramatically with an increase in brightness, so to do a comparison you have to put the monitors at the same brightness...
nikkokale 3 years ago
we're not talking about pixel response
do you're reading :)
ComdotSSC 3 years ago 2
Sow.. you won't notice it you have only 1 or 2 2408WFP's.
nietsissimpel 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hooked up my xbox 360 to the dell 2408 but do not know how to get the audio working. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
geeb21 3 years ago
Could you please tell us what are the video inputs used for this test ?
DVI for both screens ?
thx
Zefram5 3 years ago
Yes, DVI for both.
ITStuff08 3 years ago
You should test with 2408WFP as primary monitor for these tests in order to be sure the problem is not the video card.
Thank you for it, I will get mine in 2 weeks. :)
Daktary2 3 years ago
It's exactly the same whether it's primary or secondary.
ITStuff08 3 years ago
Oki doki.
No matter, input lag don't bother me even in game. :)
Daktary2 3 years ago