So, can one argue a Bill of Rights violation in court then? It has non caps for the word "people" and such. It's very forward in it's limitations of government too! Although we see violations ever more present year after year, we do see a lot of folks winning cases. You knoe things like the right to bare arms. But also the ninth amendment is interesting. So my question is, can one argue the Bill of Rights?
This is the biggest bunch of crap I've ever heard. And other than NWO Illuminati, I can't imagine anyone buying into such bullshit, let alone propagating it. The Declaration of Independence says the People of this Country have inherent & inalienable rights. And there are numerous court cases which trump Padelford saying the sovereignty of America resides with the People. And the reason certain capitonyms are used is to distinguish between proper nouns and fictions, like 14th Amendment citizens.
@jpnovation “I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon
constitutions, upon laws and courts. These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it.” Judge Learned Hand stated in the Spirit of Liberty (189).
The Constitution itself was never a Christian document. It violated
the directives of Jesus Christ by offering a power and an exercising
@JustAboutMyPolitics “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animated contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that
ye were our countrymen.” Samuel Adams
“If we will not be governed by God, then we will be ruled by tyrants.” William Penn
@JustAboutMyPolitics Section 1. Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: Oregon Constitution (this is one of the clues)
So the question is...did you sign the Con-stitution? Are you a direct bloodline of their posterity?
So, can one argue a Bill of Rights violation in court then? It has non caps for the word "people" and such. It's very forward in it's limitations of government too! Although we see violations ever more present year after year, we do see a lot of folks winning cases. You knoe things like the right to bare arms. But also the ninth amendment is interesting. So my question is, can one argue the Bill of Rights?
Escagedo3rd 3 months ago
@Escagedo3rd No
jpnovation 1 week ago
@Escagedo3rd Negative
jpnovation 1 week ago
I don't understand what you mean by "trump"
jpnovation 1 year ago
Please provide me with the court cases that 'trump' Padelford.
Thanks JP - awesome bunch of uploads man.
mastershakes75 1 year ago
Please provide me with the court cases that 'trump' Padelford.
Thanks JP - awesome bunch of uploads man.
mastershakes75 1 year ago
@mastershakes75 go to my website and spend a little time there.
jpnovation 1 week ago
There is no such thing as Christian Anarchy.
JustAboutMyPolitics 1 year ago
@JustAboutMyPolitics Yes. Look it up.
jpnovation 1 week ago
This is the biggest bunch of crap I've ever heard. And other than NWO Illuminati, I can't imagine anyone buying into such bullshit, let alone propagating it. The Declaration of Independence says the People of this Country have inherent & inalienable rights. And there are numerous court cases which trump Padelford saying the sovereignty of America resides with the People. And the reason certain capitonyms are used is to distinguish between proper nouns and fictions, like 14th Amendment citizens.
JustAboutMyPolitics 1 year ago
@JustAboutMyPolitics "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:" 2 Thessalonians 2:11
The United States Constitution did not create a true republic. as Libera Res Publica, meaning Free from Things Public.
According to Article. IV, Section 4 the U.S. was created to “guarantee
to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…” The
United States itself was an indirect democracy which is not a Republic.
jpnovation 1 year ago
@jpnovation “I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon
constitutions, upon laws and courts. These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it.” Judge Learned Hand stated in the Spirit of Liberty (189).
The Constitution itself was never a Christian document. It violated
the directives of Jesus Christ by offering a power and an exercising
authority to men.
jpnovation 1 year ago
@JustAboutMyPolitics “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animated contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that
ye were our countrymen.” Samuel Adams
“If we will not be governed by God, then we will be ruled by tyrants.” William Penn
jpnovation 1 year ago
@JustAboutMyPolitics Section 1. Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: Oregon Constitution (this is one of the clues)
So the question is...did you sign the Con-stitution? Are you a direct bloodline of their posterity?
jpnovation 1 year ago