@kasia97 Its unbelievable that there is still a lot of people disorientated and brainwashed by all that sci-fi movies we have. In space movies, directors always puts lots of stars on background because it looks better. But if you see some nice effects in movie, it does not mean its real. Why do you think you cant see any stars from the city? Or when the full moon is on the night sky?
why do so many people refer to our planet as a rock, for me it is much more than just a rock. For me it´s beautiful and just to think how many species can call this their home! I find this very emotional!
If you fancy seeing possibly the most extraordinary photo ever just wikipedia "pale blue dot". It was a photo taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft at a distance of about 6million km. The earth is just visible as a tiny speck of light.
oh yea... so wheres the ten thousand satalites. and the space station.. we dont even see a flicker ... a twinkle.. but we can see clouds water land... lmfao.. no stars either.. but we clearly see sun light and shadows. yea right. go look at live satalites around the earth.... then come back and look at this video again and ull know you should be able to see at least twinkles of them this video is two clear and too pristine.. hd right. WHERES THE SATALITES AND SPACESTATION.........
@tinman842 You can't see them because they are too small to be seen from that distance. Look at the size of Australia and then remember how big these satellites are on earth and then you'll realize that it would be too small to see a satellite flying in space from the moon. Remember too that these satellites stay fairly close to Earth and are nowhere near the moon.
@tinman842 wow whatta dumb comment. cloud paterns can spread over a lot of miles. a storm cloud pattern is typically more bigger than ISS, shuttle, or whatever satellite. also you dont see stars due to the fact the HD cameras light received is overwhelming any distant specks similar to the original apollo footages.
@VeritasAmantesVocat It does rotate at a speed synchronous to its orbit around the earth. The ability to film an earth rise/fall comes because of this "wobble" motion here: watch?v=FCKmZXhVvkQ
Errrm its widely accepted that the original shot is fake. The second one looks even more fake. You wouldnt be able to see seas or continents due to the atmosphere glowing from the suns radiation. Some folk will believe anything though i suppose
@daftweebrush -- No. It is not "widely accepted that the original shot is fake."
And of course you can se seas and continents. It's Earth. It's not Venus. Not everything is covered in clouds all the time. Weather satellites see seas and continents all the time.
(Only the kind of people who claim you couldn't see continents would think it's "fake.")
But then, some people will believe any kind of fraudulent "analysis" if it tells them something they can consider special.
its always been my life long dream to travel to space. the only thing stopping me is the $13.5 million for a seat on the shuttle and the cancellation of the nasa space program
@yesiamawizardjonny hahaha! You dont have the proper picture in your head. the same side of the moon is always facing the earth. How can the earth rize or set from the moon? Think about it.
@dt28469 Because the moon orbits the Earth, numbskull... Try it. Take a tennis ball and a basketball. Revolve and rotate the tennis ball around the basketball.. Now take a little command module or satellite replica and have it orbit the tennis ball. You'll notice you move out of the line of sight of the Earth and then back into it. Hence, an Earth rise.
@3KOBAIN Fail... Take a tennis ball and a basketball. Revolve the tennis ball without spinning it at all. It will not have the same side facing the basket ball. Not rotate the tennis ball slowly as you revolve it. It will make it so the same side of the tennis ball always faces the basketball. The moon spins, trust me..
@3KOBAIN The moon has to spin, for the same side to face Earth all the time. The moon makes one complete revolution around Earth every 27.3 days and rotates on it's axis once every 27.3 days
@dt28469 The satellite was orbitting the Moon. You are correct that a stationary observer on the Moon could not observer and "Earthset" or "Earthrise".
@dt28469 But it does appear to be moving; take a look at the ground at the image at 0:30 compared to the image at 0:45. It's obvious that the satellite has moved in that time.
@Psychoactivated You cant caputre starlight with a regualr camara. But on the other hand, the earth DOESNT SET on the moon unless your moving away from it.
@Hahaokman how can you say "Amazing what *AMERICA* has accomplished". The whole world accomplished this ever since day one. Without one and others inventions and improvement in technology we would not be where we are today.
oh and P.S this is a *JAPANESE* video *NOT* *AMERICAN*.
@shannonkuch Americans were the first ones to land on the moon dumbass.. And don't say anything you think would be correct that is not.. Go look it up.
@shannonkuch Well the nazis did have some good scientists BUT!!! The american people are the ones who progressed to landing on the moon and other amazing things... But I don't even care so...
who else gets that weird feeling when they realize everything thing the human race has ever done, everything it has ever achieved, everything we know in life all happened on that tiny little blue rock in the middle of nowhere.
@sometimesdonkey54 well it's not a blue rock it's a rock covered with many things like water! which is the blue part you were talking about <.< do you understand?!!?! :P
@sometimesdonkey54 The point is everything we have done is in the name of discovery, humanity greatest achievement is not landing on the moon but the will the carry on and discover new worlds, its such a shame that today the shuttle has ended. For the future of mankind we need to venture further and further into the cosmos
This would be incredible to witness first hand. Sadly the closest I think I'll get in this lifetime is that signed photo of 'Earth Rising' hanging on my office wall - the bloke was a dear friend of my parents.
The moon is tidally locked to the Earth, which means the same side is always facing the earth. There can't be an Earth-rise on the moon, unless you "emulate" it by moving towards the side of the moon that faces the Earth.
Uh the moon does not spin to make an Earthrise. The same face of the moon ALWAYS faces the Earth. The moon spins as Earth as its axis making so the moon is always facing the earth from the same point on the moon. No rising of Earth possible.
@blacknwhite6969 The moon we see now is colorful, and because of its atmosphere and the how far it is away from us, the colors fade away and you see it as white. The same would happen vice versa, since our planet is colorful, and we know it is, but because of our atmosphere and the distance, it'll appear white like we see the moon.
@myBuddy1017 -- The Earth is not white because it is blue. The oceans are the largest feature of the Earth.
The moon does not have an atmosphere. If it had an atmosphere, we would be able to see it. The atmosphere would cause distortions as we look across the edge of the moon at stars.
and your happy man gived down in the dark parth ... soo he was visible....becouse he's from USA right ?... WAHAHA now STFU and keep your opinion for yourself....oh and Ru..is not friend with USA anymore...sacker :P I preffer growup in Ru than USA even if someone come at me and say ,,come in USA and live forever '' Ru No.1 oh yeaaa
Hey Billy...let's fight and :D haha and I say GO FUCK YOURSELF..now u have a reason to hit me :D Yuri Gagarin maybe was first Ru.. who walk on the moon...but in USA I can't trust anything it was in time of ,,COLD WAR'' soo they needed publicity..haha.. and one more....the Flag was in moved...why? becouse one the moon exist wind <3 ? ohh verry intristing.. hahaha next date when they will walk one moon I can see water ? oh btw and in shadow of moon nothing can be visible .
"Earthset" at 1:05 is hilarious. As "Earth" goes down behind hills, you can see the Earth cover the tips of those hills just briefly. Worst special effects ever.
Everthing about Man to Moon is a big lie so STFU ( ohhh one more....they use a stupid camera Non-color only black and writh when pretend walked to moon and after that use a color camera to recording earth hmm don't you think that's really sucks ? maybe don't but keep your thinks ( have a good day ) or maybe not :D
@yowyowjim You really think Russia would allow the US to fake it? They tracked every moment of the US space flights. I guess the US and Russia were great friends back then and they decided to let the US fake the moon landings so we could win the space race. Even if you ignore the fact that there is no evidence at all the moon landings were fake, do you really think Russia wouldn't scream foul? You conspiracy people are funny with your total lack of thinking ability along with a dash of paranoia
@shananagans5 Arguing with hoaxers is pointless. They exist in a world of "9/11 inside jobs", toxic contrails and Art Bell books. It's all the same bunch. Real life is too boring for them apparently, so they have to make up James Bond-ish conspiracies to give their lives meaning.
@jtkirkfan2002 No doubt. It's irritating that you can't look through NASA vids without seeing conspiracy nuts everywhere. It can be amusing when I am in the mood but That is not very often.
It's real. The dialogue in the beginning is as well.
Just do some research on the first clip. Type the date and earthrise and it's easy enough to find out all you want to about it. I really don't see why the debate about it being fake. It has already been said, but the stars won't show up with the contrast it is really common sense.
the same side of the moon is always facing earth. It's in synchronous rotation. So someone who understands this concept should explain to me how they filmed an "earth rise" and "earthset". . .
Don't anyone think I'm for the "lunar landing hoax" conspiracy because of this. I am fascinated by the moon, and the rest of space also, and the synchronous rotation thing popped into my head.
@jordanbaker424 When You orbit the Moon, sometimes You are above the side we see from the Earth and sometimes You are above the far side. When You go round the Moon from the far side to "our" side, You must of course see the Earth "rise" behind the lunar horizon. They were in an orbit, not on the surface.
@jordanbaker424 The device was in orbit of the moon, just like the astronauts who took the pictures in 1968 were. The "Earthrise" effect was created when they moved from the dark side to the light side.
don't make comparations of sport stadion with this big sky full of stars...lol you can see in same nights more stars one the sky.... and you can see verry low when in the sky are clouds ( now you can go to moon with no clods no nothing... and tell me you will see few stars than from earth ) hah.... how you see my english's bad but nvm that ...don't try to explain something couse this is just a big joke :P
@yowyowjim You can SEE stars from the Moon if You look straight up and if You not have the very brightly illuminated ground in Your field of view: You can even photograph the stars that way. But You can NOT have the comparatively faint stars on the same photo as the sunlit ground, without totally overexposing the ground. That should be easy to understand, i think.
@Misguidedism The stars are there, but theres too much contrast to see them with such a short exposure. Its the same on Earth, you cant see stars in the daytime. Its not an artifact of our atmosphere, but of pure contrast.
@MrAmerica99997 One very weird thing about the moon is the way it always keeps the same face to the earth. Another weird thing is how it's the perfect size to eclipse the sun. Yet another is how it has a reflective surface as if it's intended as a night time replacement for the sun.
@RavenPrecept That's earth gravity that locks its rotation like that. Mercury does the same with the sun. The size isn't anywhere near perfect, since to see a "total eclipse" you need to be in a precise area of the Earth's surface when it happens, otherwise you see a "partial eclipse".
It doesn't have a particularly more reflective surface than the average asteroid. It's just very very close (astronomically speaking).
@bobafetthotmail You miss my point. During the total eclipse you can see the moon is the same size in the sky as the sun. The amount of light reflected by the moon is very significant, being the difference between a very dark night and hardly dark at all.
@RavenPrecept I was saying that to see a total eclipse you need to stay in particular places of the globe at a particular time. This means the moon just projects a shadow on Earth, its size isn't "perfect".
The amount of light reflected by the moon is significant, but that is due to sheer huge surface and close vicinity to Earth, not because of its supposedly magical material.
@RavenPrecept And, what about dark nights, and not so dark nights? It's only during full, or almost full Moon that the night is not so dark. In other times, and also with heavy clouds, the Moon doesn't give much light. So, what's the "significans"?
@YDDES I don't know the mechanism by which the moon is significant. I am working top down, not bottom up. I don't believe that it makes sense to assume that the Earth and the Moon being the same size in the sky is a co-incidence. Being as this planet supports life it would be fair to say that any unlikely arrangements are in fact the conditions needed for life to develop. I would suggest that a womans menstrual cycle and the period of the Moon are linked. I am not the first to note that.
@RavenPrecept WEll, do You also think that it may be significant for life on Earth that the highest mountain and the deepest deep are almost the same, counted from the oceans surface? That is, just for this moment. There have been much bigger differences. It's a totally unscientifical behaviour to search for significance where it isn't appearent from the outset.
The womens and the Moons periods has nothing to do with the amount of arc seconds the Moon occupies in the sky. Continued...
@RavenPrecept ... continuing: It's more likely that it has to do with the tide. Maybe as long back as when we crawled up on land. Or, as some scientists say, were "watermonkeys", living at the shores. I'm sure there are scientifical theories about it, but I haven't studied it much.
But, i still wonder how You can think that the Moons appearant size can be of any importance for existence of life, since it has slowly moved away from the Earth since it was formed.
@RavenPrecept "I would suggest that a womans menstrual cycle and the period of the Moon are linked. I am not the first to note that." You aren't the first to be wrong in this either. ww w.skepdic.c om/fullmoon.html
@bobafetthotmail If you believe in Darwin's natural selection then you might imagine that there would be many slight variations on what we have as a solar system. If the moon could have been that bit bigger or smaller in the sky than the sun then we could be living on that planet. Perhaps it's a natural selection thing that our moon eclipses the sun precisely. There are many such chance arrangements which are probably required for life. After all we would not be discussing this on a dead planet.
@RavenPrecept natural selection just states that suckers die, really.
Astronomy is another thing entirely.
For life to develop a planet must have a decent atmosphere, to have a decent atmosphere it must have a magnetic field (otherwise you get Mars or Venus-like planets), and to have a magnetic field, it must be big as the Earth at least.
@bobafetthotmail This is my point, we do not live on Mars. Maybe there is a microbe on Mars but not a man. Natural selection did not select Mars. If Earth was not in exactly the right place in the solar system then we would not be here. God may have put the Earth where it is or Darwin's Natural Selection says that out of all the variations of planets this one was the fittest, or at least fit enough for life. So look at the Earth and Solar System and realize this is the way it needs to be.
@RavenPrecept The Moon eclipses the Sun just for this moment. It slowly moves outwards, so, in some million years, it can no longer eclipse the Sun entirely. And the eclipses have nothing to do with the ability of life on Earth.
@YDDES This planet and this solar system are perfect for the type of life we see on earth. This could be the result of natural selection. With the billions of other solar systems out there it is possible that there are ones with the moon just a bit bigger than the sun in the sky. However we are ALIVE on one where the moon is the same size as the sun pretty much. We do not live on Mars, it has to be noted. Conditions on Earth are just right, therefore anything could be significant.
@RavenPrecept Do You have any theory WHY the the visible size of the Moon could be significant? As I said, during most of the four billion years there has been life on this planet, the Moon has been much bigger than the sun in the sky. And, every sun-eclipse is seen only from a very limited area, during a very short time. How can that be significant for the evolution of life? I think You invent a "theory" without the slightest scientifical support.
@YDDES If you were to multiply all the odd random co-incidences that came together to allow life on Earth you will see that it's not just chance that we live here. When you lose your keys you always find them in the last place you looked (you don't keep looking once you found them). If you evolve on a planet then you always evolve on one that can support life (or else you would be dead). Therefore the strangest things we see in the solar system are the things required for the life we see here.
An ultraviolet telescope was taken to the lunar surface on Apollo 16 and operated in the shadow of the lunar module. It captured pictures of the earth and of many stars, some of which are dim in visible light but bright in the ultraviolet. These observations were later matched up with observations taken by orbiting ultraviolet telescopes. Furthermore, the positions of those stars with respect to the earth are correct for the time and location of the Apollo 16 photographs. Hoaxtards are idiots.
Germany systematically uses torture and murder to silence any opposition. Some of the murders known to the public: Uwe Barschel, Jürgen Möllemann, Heiner Gehring, Martina Pflock, Tron, Karl Koch, Bernd Seiffert, Kirsten Heisig, Fritz Bauer.
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage.
German snitchers are following me on youtube and immediately flag my postings.
is it me or does this video look a tad...cartoonish?
BeanShip 22 hours ago
love the video man
grisgrisy 6 days ago
what i would do to see this for myself
0001Virus1000 1 week ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 2 weeks ago
Japs need to get better at CGI, this looks from a 1998 movie
darkins779 3 weeks ago
It's a joke.
kennjohnsen 3 weeks ago
the earth set brought a tear to my eye , we are distroying this drop of blue in the darkness
zghvbn1 3 weeks ago
the earth aka germany
skiegiek 2 months ago
How can you even press the dislike button.
This is fantastic!
vandorz 2 months ago
i cant see any borders
zenoparodie 3 months ago 2
Breathtaking, then, now and forever!
kimmetje1976 3 months ago
where are all the stars though?
kasia97 3 months ago
@kasia97 Its unbelievable that there is still a lot of people disorientated and brainwashed by all that sci-fi movies we have. In space movies, directors always puts lots of stars on background because it looks better. But if you see some nice effects in movie, it does not mean its real. Why do you think you cant see any stars from the city? Or when the full moon is on the night sky?
TommyTMOD 3 months ago
@TommyTMOD light pollution.
ZachTechnicolour 3 months ago
i think the old one looks better
Falcon843 4 months ago
wow !
1vannam1conthuyen 4 months ago
why do so many people refer to our planet as a rock, for me it is much more than just a rock. For me it´s beautiful and just to think how many species can call this their home! I find this very emotional!
ger1ist 5 months ago 2
If you fancy seeing possibly the most extraordinary photo ever just wikipedia "pale blue dot". It was a photo taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft at a distance of about 6million km. The earth is just visible as a tiny speck of light.
1ScouserNProud1 5 months ago
oh yea... so wheres the ten thousand satalites. and the space station.. we dont even see a flicker ... a twinkle.. but we can see clouds water land... lmfao.. no stars either.. but we clearly see sun light and shadows. yea right. go look at live satalites around the earth.... then come back and look at this video again and ull know you should be able to see at least twinkles of them this video is two clear and too pristine.. hd right. WHERES THE SATALITES AND SPACESTATION.........
tinman842 6 months ago
@tinman842
i can't see your house either all the way from the Moon, lol...
dazp1 5 months ago
@tinman842 You can't see them because they are too small to be seen from that distance. Look at the size of Australia and then remember how big these satellites are on earth and then you'll realize that it would be too small to see a satellite flying in space from the moon. Remember too that these satellites stay fairly close to Earth and are nowhere near the moon.
Scott89878 5 months ago
@tinman842 wow whatta dumb comment. cloud paterns can spread over a lot of miles. a storm cloud pattern is typically more bigger than ISS, shuttle, or whatever satellite. also you dont see stars due to the fact the HD cameras light received is overwhelming any distant specks similar to the original apollo footages.
nakazatoGTR 5 months ago
The jap video looks like fucking CGI.
Didn't take CSI to work that one out.
spoonracing2011 6 months ago
0:01
puppet410 6 months ago
Third rock from the sun.
ghostalin 6 months ago
could be better... they need to hire a better team to make this computer generated images work
Gr8Success 6 months ago
why does the camera go back on the earth decent and forward on the rise....
come on
hughezee 6 months ago
Thank you so much for this vid man.
Thirras88 6 months ago
I thought the moon didnt rotate?
VeritasAmantesVocat 6 months ago
@VeritasAmantesVocat It does rotate at a speed synchronous to its orbit around the earth. The ability to film an earth rise/fall comes because of this "wobble" motion here: watch?v=FCKmZXhVvkQ
DeePhlat 6 months ago
@VeritasAmantesVocat Although, the rise seen from the kaguya satilite because it is orbiting the moon
DeePhlat 6 months ago
1:20 Dark side of the moon? Wait a minute, where the fuck at the transformers? lol
mastercdric 6 months ago
We should look after that blue ball a bit better.
capricious71 6 months ago
there aint starts in the frigging space?!
AQWorldRatburgers 6 months ago
@AQWorldRatburgers You're freaking retarded.
jedihunter176 6 months ago
@jedihunter176 so youre mom
AQWorldRatburgers 6 months ago
@AQWorldRatburgers Is that even a sentence? That makes no sense whatsoever.
jedihunter176 6 months ago
YEPPP THE GLORY HOLE!!!!
CocktaiLMolotovX 7 months ago
Informative Video. Greet from Pakistan
lucaishaky 7 months ago
i love earth, its where we come from. Not countries or whatever territories, but earth.
spongeprince123 7 months ago 21
Comment removed
moonblade1337 7 months ago
Wonderful imagery, gives meaning to life.
Pudersepp 7 months ago
Errrm its widely accepted that the original shot is fake. The second one looks even more fake. You wouldnt be able to see seas or continents due to the atmosphere glowing from the suns radiation. Some folk will believe anything though i suppose
daftweebrush 7 months ago
@daftweebrush -- No. It is not "widely accepted that the original shot is fake."
And of course you can se seas and continents. It's Earth. It's not Venus. Not everything is covered in clouds all the time. Weather satellites see seas and continents all the time.
(Only the kind of people who claim you couldn't see continents would think it's "fake.")
But then, some people will believe any kind of fraudulent "analysis" if it tells them something they can consider special.
nesokretep 7 months ago
its always been my life long dream to travel to space. the only thing stopping me is the $13.5 million for a seat on the shuttle and the cancellation of the nasa space program
cdrsportspaintball 7 months ago
why doyou want Earth man
siTTinLo420 7 months ago
THERE IS NO RISING EARTH IN MOON'S SKY !!!!!!!!!!!
earth doesn't move in the sky watching from moon surface!!!!
mariomeraviglioso 7 months ago
@mariomeraviglioso
Except that the satellite isn't watching from the surface, it's watching while it's orbiting. So the earth looks like it's moving.
QuickdrawMcShaw 7 months ago
haha, almost every real piece of footage of the earth is so badly over exposed xD
tarrizzzzzzzzz 8 months ago
fake and gay
Lucasdeboer 8 months ago
this vid was fake
3KOBAIN 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out this video about what NASA has to say about the acclaimed "moon landing" in this hilarious FAIL of an interview:
/watch?v=vhveYoYZOws&feature=channel_video_title
AndyHarglesis 8 months ago
what is the name of the song ?
MajorHoward7 8 months ago
WTF? the moon is tidely locked (It doesnt spin). How the hell is the earth gonna set?
THATS IMPOSSIBLE!
dt28469 8 months ago
@dt28469 The moon spins you fucking idiot.
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny hahaha! You dont have the proper picture in your head. the same side of the moon is always facing the earth. How can the earth rize or set from the moon? Think about it.
dt28469 8 months ago
@dt28469 Because the moon orbits the Earth, numbskull... Try it. Take a tennis ball and a basketball. Revolve and rotate the tennis ball around the basketball.. Now take a little command module or satellite replica and have it orbit the tennis ball. You'll notice you move out of the line of sight of the Earth and then back into it. Hence, an Earth rise.
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny the moon does not spin, it is always facing the same way.
3KOBAIN 8 months ago
@3KOBAIN Yes, the moon spins. It rotates at the same rate as it revolves. If it didn't spin, we wouldn't always see the same side of it.
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny no we see the same side because it doesn't spin
3KOBAIN 8 months ago
@3KOBAIN I it does not spin we would see the dark side of the moon every month, it does spin, one lunar day is 28 days long.
musicbruv 8 months ago
@3KOBAIN Fail... Take a tennis ball and a basketball. Revolve the tennis ball without spinning it at all. It will not have the same side facing the basket ball. Not rotate the tennis ball slowly as you revolve it. It will make it so the same side of the tennis ball always faces the basketball. The moon spins, trust me..
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@3KOBAIN The moon has to spin, for the same side to face Earth all the time. The moon makes one complete revolution around Earth every 27.3 days and rotates on it's axis once every 27.3 days
deadlyradiation 8 months ago 8
@dt28469 The satellite was orbitting the Moon. You are correct that a stationary observer on the Moon could not observer and "Earthset" or "Earthrise".
bluecode320 8 months ago
@bluecode320 OK I believe that, but why doesnt the ground appear to be moving?
dt28469 8 months ago
@dt28469 But it does appear to be moving; take a look at the ground at the image at 0:30 compared to the image at 0:45. It's obvious that the satellite has moved in that time.
bluecode320 8 months ago
@bluecode320 Oh yeah thats true. I can see it now.
dt28469 8 months ago
@dt28469 it's orbiting the opposite way
jackbauer27Psn 8 months ago
Is it just me or does the moon look kind of fake??
stevenmarkgalway 9 months ago
the Japan images look to be fake. I am not discrediting the poster of but something looks weird about it/
chance0982 9 months ago
@chance0982
Yeah.. Same thing.. Where is stars.. Look very fake..
Psychoactivated 9 months ago
@Psychoactivated You cant caputre starlight with a regualr camara. But on the other hand, the earth DOESNT SET on the moon unless your moving away from it.
dt28469 8 months ago
If I could of have been on one mission it would have been Apollo 8.
To see this planet as it truly is for the first time as it rises above the moon must have been an emotional overload.
Throw in the reading of Genesis on christmas eve and you've got one of the most poetic moments in human history.
tretrioeciii 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Recuerdas cuando la informacion del video estaba a la derecha?
Recuerdas cuando no habia anuncios comerciales?
Recuerdas cuando Youtube no era controlado por las corporaciones?
Recuerdas cuando habia un sistema de 5 estrellas?
Recuerdas cuando no habia trabas en el contador de reproducciones?
Recuerdas cuando no habia problemas de copyright?
Recuerdas cuando la musica era subida por los usuarios, no por VEVO?
Quermos devuelta a Youtube! copia este mensage en otros videos
agrochicho 9 months ago
Amazing what America has accomplished :)
Hahaokman 9 months ago
Comment removed
shannonkuch 9 months ago
@Hahaokman how can you say "Amazing what *AMERICA* has accomplished". The whole world accomplished this ever since day one. Without one and others inventions and improvement in technology we would not be where we are today.
oh and P.S this is a *JAPANESE* video *NOT* *AMERICAN*.
shannonkuch 9 months ago
@shannonkuch Americans were the first ones to land on the moon dumbass.. And don't say anything you think would be correct that is not.. Go look it up.
Hahaokman 9 months ago
@Hahaokman you know who started nasa? NAZIS and NAZIS are GERMAN, NOT AMERICAN :P
shannonkuch 9 months ago
@shannonkuch Well the nazis did have some good scientists BUT!!! The american people are the ones who progressed to landing on the moon and other amazing things... But I don't even care so...
Hahaokman 9 months ago
@Hahaokman yeah neither do i
shannonkuch 9 months ago
@Hahaokman The first moon landing was a hoax ....now whos the dumbass
BananafiedBread 9 months ago
@BananafiedBread Im sure it was a hoax
Hahaokman 9 months ago
The Earth "rises" and "sets" because the Kaguya is orbiting the Moon, not standing on it...
AlexandruUrsachi 9 months ago
Imagine tripping acid on the moon........ WAYYYYYYYYY too intense
jaffey2006 10 months ago 2
yea but id give anything to rip my bong up there
ondamountain 9 months ago
who else gets that weird feeling when they realize everything thing the human race has ever done, everything it has ever achieved, everything we know in life all happened on that tiny little blue rock in the middle of nowhere.
sometimesdonkey54 10 months ago 72
@sometimesdonkey54 well it's not a blue rock it's a rock covered with many things like water! which is the blue part you were talking about <.< do you understand?!!?! :P
shannonkuch 9 months ago
@shannonkuch i hope that is you just tryna be funny.
amor987654321 9 months ago
@sometimesdonkey54 Carl Sagan does
zackhunt86 8 months ago
@sometimesdonkey54 i do...
KinkNAbmx 8 months ago
@sometimesdonkey54 If the known universe was twice the size of the sun, the earth would be smaller than an electron.
the81stviewer 8 months ago
@sometimesdonkey54 You sir, sound cheesy as fuck
randomstough 7 months ago
@sometimesdonkey54 The point is everything we have done is in the name of discovery, humanity greatest achievement is not landing on the moon but the will the carry on and discover new worlds, its such a shame that today the shuttle has ended. For the future of mankind we need to venture further and further into the cosmos
BonkersFFXI 6 months ago
idk that Japan footage looks an awful lot like 3d rendering that looks nothing like the moon. Im sorry.
ILuv2troll 10 months ago
i can see my house
187BURNZY 10 months ago 30
@187BURNZY no you cant
lifethelifetoday 9 months ago
Can someone help me find what music this is? Amazing video by the way, I've watched this soooooo many times!! Thank you :)
magicreelmedia 10 months ago
1:04 beautiful sunset, i mean earthset, my home is beautiful
brahim121985brahim 10 months ago 3
damn I left the bathroom light on !
roy00200 10 months ago 2
This would be incredible to witness first hand. Sadly the closest I think I'll get in this lifetime is that signed photo of 'Earth Rising' hanging on my office wall - the bloke was a dear friend of my parents.
lank05 11 months ago
The moon is tidally locked to the Earth, which means the same side is always facing the earth. There can't be an Earth-rise on the moon, unless you "emulate" it by moving towards the side of the moon that faces the Earth.
Quartrez 11 months ago
Comment removed
Quartrez 11 months ago
Uh the moon does not spin to make an Earthrise. The same face of the moon ALWAYS faces the Earth. The moon spins as Earth as its axis making so the moon is always facing the earth from the same point on the moon. No rising of Earth possible.
Ritercrazy 11 months ago
Fantastic
jojoajaj 11 months ago
The US at it's peak!
We will be a 'has-been' country if the wrong right have their way.
luveraaab 11 months ago
@luveraaab
The US will become a 2nd rate country not because of any specific group of Americans, but because of Chinese & Indian (+ maybe EU) tax revenue.
notfromthistime 11 months ago
When do you stop being above the Earth and start being away from it...
Tyrannobeast 11 months ago
@Tyrannobeast Technically, you can't go above the Earth, you always go away from it.
Quartrez 11 months ago
@Tyrannobeast How long is a piece of string?
lank05 11 months ago
How is it possible that the Earth is blue when viewed from the moon? It should be white. If you question my comment then use google.
myBuddy1017 1 year ago
@myBuddy1017 why would Earth be white? (not arguing, just curious)
blacknwhite6969 1 year ago
@blacknwhite6969 The moon we see now is colorful, and because of its atmosphere and the how far it is away from us, the colors fade away and you see it as white. The same would happen vice versa, since our planet is colorful, and we know it is, but because of our atmosphere and the distance, it'll appear white like we see the moon.
myBuddy1017 1 year ago
@myBuddy1017 do you have any sort of source to back this up? it sounds a bit like rubbish to me, that's why i ask!
blacknwhite6969 1 year ago
@myBuddy1017 -- The Earth is not white because it is blue. The oceans are the largest feature of the Earth.
The moon does not have an atmosphere. If it had an atmosphere, we would be able to see it. The atmosphere would cause distortions as we look across the edge of the moon at stars.
nesokretep 11 months ago
buen video
theartstroza 1 year ago
and your happy man gived down in the dark parth ... soo he was visible....becouse he's from USA right ?... WAHAHA now STFU and keep your opinion for yourself....oh and Ru..is not friend with USA anymore...sacker :P I preffer growup in Ru than USA even if someone come at me and say ,,come in USA and live forever '' Ru No.1 oh yeaaa
yowyowjim 1 year ago
Hey Billy...let's fight and :D haha and I say GO FUCK YOURSELF..now u have a reason to hit me :D Yuri Gagarin maybe was first Ru.. who walk on the moon...but in USA I can't trust anything it was in time of ,,COLD WAR'' soo they needed publicity..haha.. and one more....the Flag was in moved...why? becouse one the moon exist wind <3 ? ohh verry intristing.. hahaha next date when they will walk one moon I can see water ? oh btw and in shadow of moon nothing can be visible .
yowyowjim 1 year ago
"Earthset" at 1:05 is hilarious. As "Earth" goes down behind hills, you can see the Earth cover the tips of those hills just briefly. Worst special effects ever.
kaderoder 1 year ago
Everthing about Man to Moon is a big lie so STFU ( ohhh one more....they use a stupid camera Non-color only black and writh when pretend walked to moon and after that use a color camera to recording earth hmm don't you think that's really sucks ? maybe don't but keep your thinks ( have a good day ) or maybe not :D
yowyowjim 1 year ago
@yowyowjim "
You must be one of those conspiracists thinking he is smarter than 41 years worth of science and engineering.. get over it; we went to the Moon.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@yowyowjim You really think Russia would allow the US to fake it? They tracked every moment of the US space flights. I guess the US and Russia were great friends back then and they decided to let the US fake the moon landings so we could win the space race. Even if you ignore the fact that there is no evidence at all the moon landings were fake, do you really think Russia wouldn't scream foul? You conspiracy people are funny with your total lack of thinking ability along with a dash of paranoia
shananagans5 1 year ago
@shananagans5 Arguing with hoaxers is pointless. They exist in a world of "9/11 inside jobs", toxic contrails and Art Bell books. It's all the same bunch. Real life is too boring for them apparently, so they have to make up James Bond-ish conspiracies to give their lives meaning.
jtkirkfan2002 1 year ago 2
@jtkirkfan2002 No doubt. It's irritating that you can't look through NASA vids without seeing conspiracy nuts everywhere. It can be amusing when I am in the mood but That is not very often.
shananagans5 1 year ago
It's real. The dialogue in the beginning is as well.
Just do some research on the first clip. Type the date and earthrise and it's easy enough to find out all you want to about it. I really don't see why the debate about it being fake. It has already been said, but the stars won't show up with the contrast it is really common sense.
Tharrhountes 1 year ago
the same side of the moon is always facing earth. It's in synchronous rotation. So someone who understands this concept should explain to me how they filmed an "earth rise" and "earthset". . .
Don't anyone think I'm for the "lunar landing hoax" conspiracy because of this. I am fascinated by the moon, and the rest of space also, and the synchronous rotation thing popped into my head.
jordanbaker424 1 year ago
@jordanbaker424 nevermind. I guess if you were orbiting the moon, your orbit could simulate an earthrise or set
jordanbaker424 1 year ago
@jordanbaker424 When You orbit the Moon, sometimes You are above the side we see from the Earth and sometimes You are above the far side. When You go round the Moon from the far side to "our" side, You must of course see the Earth "rise" behind the lunar horizon. They were in an orbit, not on the surface.
YDDES 1 year ago
@jordanbaker424 The device was in orbit of the moon, just like the astronauts who took the pictures in 1968 were. The "Earthrise" effect was created when they moved from the dark side to the light side.
jtkirkfan2002 1 year ago
The 2007 earthrise clip is fake. Shame, shame.
likeitharder 1 year ago
don't make comparations of sport stadion with this big sky full of stars...lol you can see in same nights more stars one the sky.... and you can see verry low when in the sky are clouds ( now you can go to moon with no clods no nothing... and tell me you will see few stars than from earth ) hah.... how you see my english's bad but nvm that ...don't try to explain something couse this is just a big joke :P
yowyowjim 1 year ago
@yowyowjim You can SEE stars from the Moon if You look straight up and if You not have the very brightly illuminated ground in Your field of view: You can even photograph the stars that way. But You can NOT have the comparatively faint stars on the same photo as the sunlit ground, without totally overexposing the ground. That should be easy to understand, i think.
YDDES 1 year ago
First one's a fake.
bweazel 1 year ago
what big joke... oO where are stars ? wtf
yowyowjim 1 year ago
@yowyowjim Wow.
MrDavey2727 1 year ago
Some people just don't get it,I mean ..this IS us,we are so shattered as a people,why?
twenty2082 1 year ago 2
some of them are fake....
Cioskar 1 year ago
I can see my house!
Tmal10 1 year ago
it almost looks fake, but I know its not OR IS IT O_O
B0rnToRoll 1 year ago
great
anonimo111able 1 year ago
It almost looks fake but its not is it?
B0rnToRoll 1 year ago
so where are the stars in this video? moon has no atmosphere to penetrate so surely the stars should be everywhere.
Misguidedism 1 year ago
@Misguidedism They are there, the light from them is just to faint to be captured with the exposure settings used.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
@Misguidedism The stars are there, but theres too much contrast to see them with such a short exposure. Its the same on Earth, you cant see stars in the daytime. Its not an artifact of our atmosphere, but of pure contrast.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
So gorgeous....
kyleaz2000 1 year ago
THIS IS COMPLETE FUKING SHIT!!! THE EARTH CAN"T RISE FROM THE MOON!
god i hate ppl who make this shitz...
MrAmerica99997 1 year ago
Comment removed
DamienDoe 1 year ago
@DamienDoe Its impossible, only ONE SIDE of the moon face the earth, the moon doesnt spin on its axis, it just orbits the earth
MrAmerica99997 1 year ago
@MrAmerica99997 Do you forget, that the spacecraft was orbiting the moon (and moving)? So there is no impossibility for a rising earth.
CHSarahBs 1 year ago
@CHSarahBs Well that is true. but if you are standing on the surface of the moon it would be impossible. But yea, you are right
MrAmerica99997 1 year ago
@MrAmerica99997 Ah ok. I have understood your post in the meaning of sitting in a spacecraft and not being on the moon surface.
CHSarahBs 1 year ago
@MrAmerica99997 One very weird thing about the moon is the way it always keeps the same face to the earth. Another weird thing is how it's the perfect size to eclipse the sun. Yet another is how it has a reflective surface as if it's intended as a night time replacement for the sun.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept That's earth gravity that locks its rotation like that. Mercury does the same with the sun. The size isn't anywhere near perfect, since to see a "total eclipse" you need to be in a precise area of the Earth's surface when it happens, otherwise you see a "partial eclipse".
It doesn't have a particularly more reflective surface than the average asteroid. It's just very very close (astronomically speaking).
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail You miss my point. During the total eclipse you can see the moon is the same size in the sky as the sun. The amount of light reflected by the moon is very significant, being the difference between a very dark night and hardly dark at all.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept I was saying that to see a total eclipse you need to stay in particular places of the globe at a particular time. This means the moon just projects a shadow on Earth, its size isn't "perfect".
Look at this pic:
en.wikipedia.o rg/wiki/File:Geometry_of_a_Total_Solar_Eclipse.svg
The amount of light reflected by the moon is significant, but that is due to sheer huge surface and close vicinity to Earth, not because of its supposedly magical material.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept And, what about dark nights, and not so dark nights? It's only during full, or almost full Moon that the night is not so dark. In other times, and also with heavy clouds, the Moon doesn't give much light. So, what's the "significans"?
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES I don't know the mechanism by which the moon is significant. I am working top down, not bottom up. I don't believe that it makes sense to assume that the Earth and the Moon being the same size in the sky is a co-incidence. Being as this planet supports life it would be fair to say that any unlikely arrangements are in fact the conditions needed for life to develop. I would suggest that a womans menstrual cycle and the period of the Moon are linked. I am not the first to note that.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept WEll, do You also think that it may be significant for life on Earth that the highest mountain and the deepest deep are almost the same, counted from the oceans surface? That is, just for this moment. There have been much bigger differences. It's a totally unscientifical behaviour to search for significance where it isn't appearent from the outset.
The womens and the Moons periods has nothing to do with the amount of arc seconds the Moon occupies in the sky. Continued...
YDDES 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept ... continuing: It's more likely that it has to do with the tide. Maybe as long back as when we crawled up on land. Or, as some scientists say, were "watermonkeys", living at the shores. I'm sure there are scientifical theories about it, but I haven't studied it much.
But, i still wonder how You can think that the Moons appearant size can be of any importance for existence of life, since it has slowly moved away from the Earth since it was formed.
YDDES 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept "I would suggest that a womans menstrual cycle and the period of the Moon are linked. I am not the first to note that." You aren't the first to be wrong in this either. ww w.skepdic.c om/fullmoon.html
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail If you believe in Darwin's natural selection then you might imagine that there would be many slight variations on what we have as a solar system. If the moon could have been that bit bigger or smaller in the sky than the sun then we could be living on that planet. Perhaps it's a natural selection thing that our moon eclipses the sun precisely. There are many such chance arrangements which are probably required for life. After all we would not be discussing this on a dead planet.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept natural selection just states that suckers die, really.
Astronomy is another thing entirely.
For life to develop a planet must have a decent atmosphere, to have a decent atmosphere it must have a magnetic field (otherwise you get Mars or Venus-like planets), and to have a magnetic field, it must be big as the Earth at least.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail This is my point, we do not live on Mars. Maybe there is a microbe on Mars but not a man. Natural selection did not select Mars. If Earth was not in exactly the right place in the solar system then we would not be here. God may have put the Earth where it is or Darwin's Natural Selection says that out of all the variations of planets this one was the fittest, or at least fit enough for life. So look at the Earth and Solar System and realize this is the way it needs to be.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept And with that what the hell you wanna say? You're just stating the obvious.
Also, natural selection does not "select" where life will evolve, it is not a deity.
It is just a fancy name for a natural process that kills off the individuals not able to survive.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept The Moon eclipses the Sun just for this moment. It slowly moves outwards, so, in some million years, it can no longer eclipse the Sun entirely. And the eclipses have nothing to do with the ability of life on Earth.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES This planet and this solar system are perfect for the type of life we see on earth. This could be the result of natural selection. With the billions of other solar systems out there it is possible that there are ones with the moon just a bit bigger than the sun in the sky. However we are ALIVE on one where the moon is the same size as the sun pretty much. We do not live on Mars, it has to be noted. Conditions on Earth are just right, therefore anything could be significant.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
@RavenPrecept Do You have any theory WHY the the visible size of the Moon could be significant? As I said, during most of the four billion years there has been life on this planet, the Moon has been much bigger than the sun in the sky. And, every sun-eclipse is seen only from a very limited area, during a very short time. How can that be significant for the evolution of life? I think You invent a "theory" without the slightest scientifical support.
YDDES 1 year ago
@YDDES If you were to multiply all the odd random co-incidences that came together to allow life on Earth you will see that it's not just chance that we live here. When you lose your keys you always find them in the last place you looked (you don't keep looking once you found them). If you evolve on a planet then you always evolve on one that can support life (or else you would be dead). Therefore the strangest things we see in the solar system are the things required for the life we see here.
RavenPrecept 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An ultraviolet telescope was taken to the lunar surface on Apollo 16 and operated in the shadow of the lunar module. It captured pictures of the earth and of many stars, some of which are dim in visible light but bright in the ultraviolet. These observations were later matched up with observations taken by orbiting ultraviolet telescopes. Furthermore, the positions of those stars with respect to the earth are correct for the time and location of the Apollo 16 photographs. Hoaxtards are idiots.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Germany systematically uses torture and murder to silence any opposition. Some of the murders known to the public: Uwe Barschel, Jürgen Möllemann, Heiner Gehring, Martina Pflock, Tron, Karl Koch, Bernd Seiffert, Kirsten Heisig, Fritz Bauer.
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage.
German snitchers are following me on youtube and immediately flag my postings.
wwwtotalitaerde 1 year ago
hey look at my home overthere called earth lol
dazdozdaz 1 year ago 19
damn :o the hd view looks bit like 3d generated (3d designer) ^^
predatortheme 1 year ago
Beautiful...What is the music?
DramaDon83 1 year ago
FAKE!!
TheJcp1234 1 year ago
@TheJcp1234 Yes, because compared by sizes Earth from the Moon looks to small. Than the Moon from The Earth.
ShaCRaM 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And this annimation movie is quite good, but have nothing to do with reality.
Its not shit this, its good.
But everyone can see its a annimation, far from reality.
Man have never been on the moon, its simply not possible for a human.
It was about fake, money, politics and the power of USA.
Its closed and this discussion is not longer.
Every one know that... and then the naiv belivers, thats nice to belive this.
But sorry America fake so much, they do today too to keep power.
DjBjarki 1 year ago