Added: 1 year ago
From: ANCalerts
Views: 3,511
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Are you sure? I think you have to talk with your remedial teacher again sir...

  • Comment removed

  • WHAT THE?! Come on! DNA testing would prove his innocence--that he did not commit the crime! Hello?! It would more than prove his alibi!!!!

  • @goofypet

    "DNA testing would prove his innocence--that he did not commit the crime! Hello?! It would more than prove his alibi!!!!"

    WRONG! IF THE DNA TESTING SHOWS THAT THE SAMPLE DOES NOT MATCH HIS DNA, IT STILL DOES NOT FOLLOW THAT HE DID NOT RAPE CARMELA. WHY? BECAUSE IT'S POSSIBLE HE ONLY HAD PENETRATION BUT DID NOT ACHIEVE EJACULATION WHEN HE RAPED CARMELA. MOREOVER, SINCE THERE WAS CONSPIRACY (ACT OF ONE, ACT OF ALL), EVEN IF HE WAS ONLY THE LOOKOUT HE CAN BE CONVICTED OF RAPE.

  • 0:34 -0:48 How stupid can you get Mr Speaker?

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more