I have a first hand account of someone that had the same thing happen to him as a result of a later admitted mistake on YouTube's behalf. They didn't send him any notification either. So yes; it is true.
I tend to agree with you on the points about free speech. I may disagree with you on what you say, but to censor it because it's unpopular is not fair. However, Youtube is not the federal government. They are a business and have the right to do with it as they will. Perhaps you could move your discussion to private board where you can control the conversation.
hi, sorry to bother you, but my account was taken down the same also .. I see you got the channel back, how did you manage to do that ? .. I would love to be able to get mine back...
So you only advocate the right to free speech and expression of yourself or those you agree with? Since you disagreed with the existence of my other channel, it's a victory for anything else I say in any other venue to be systematically removed?
@SecularAstronomer - Sorry, but that argument doesn't work here. You have no right to free speech here. You have the privilege of speech only to the extent which YT affords you and YT can revoke that privilege at any time for any reason. (The same with GodTube.) You yourself have admitted that this wasn't the result of false-flagging, so obviously you ran afoul of YT's policies. Instead feigning innocence and complaining about YT, maybe you should carefully examine your own behavior.
"Sorry, but that argument doesn't work here. You have no right to free speech here. You have the privilege of speech only to the extent which YT affords you and YT can revoke that privilege at any time for any reason. (The same with GodTube.) … As I already have pointed out, it's not censorship, so please stop accusing YT of it."
No, that argument doesn't work, as it addresses an argument I never made. I never said YouTube doesn't have the right to censor.
And yes, right or wrong (I say wrong) it is perfectly legal censorship on YouTube's behalf. Please look up the word in a dictionary: "to suppress or delete as objectionable." YouTube could even decide to ban certain races of people, if they wanted. It would be legal, but not necessarily acceptable in the eyes of most.
@SecularAstronomer - It's not censorship when you have no inherent right to post whatever you want. If a cop takes away you protest sign on a public sidewalk, that's censorship. When a private company asks you to remove your sign (and yourself) from their property, that's not censorship.
The point I was actually making is that it could easily be inferred from your callous response to legal, yet unprovoked censorship (with no discernable justification) of one that you disagree with, that you only support the speech/expression rights of those you agree with.
"You yourself have admitted that this wasn't the result of false-flagging, so obviously you ran afoul of YT's policies. Instead feigning innocence and complaining about YT, maybe you should carefully examine your own behavior."
Your assumption is unfounded. I know for a fact that I violated no policies on that channel (either in my two uploaded videos or in any comment section).
@SecularAstronomer - How can you know for a fact that you didn't violate any policies when you admit you don't really know why they took the channel down?
I bet you would claim, too, that you didn't violate any policies on GodTube with your SoldierInGodsArmy account there.
I have a first hand account of someone that had the same thing happen to him as a result of a later admitted mistake on YouTube's behalf.
I also have a first hand account that YouTube sometimes responds to a mere alleging of harassment by doing this as well. And I know that I never harassed NephilimFree, or anyone else.
It is obvious that YouTube either deleted my MBV account by mistake or as a result of false claims. This is corroborated by the fact that YouTube reinstated the account months ago.
But I doubt you will consider any of this, JMcH, as your mind seems to be quite made up about me, as a whole (so to speak).
Well, unlike some, I agree with the statement that "the only way to make sure people you agree with can speak is to support the rights of people you don't agree with (Eleanor Norton)," and would never sink so low as to take pleasure in, or gloat about, the censorship of anyone (like what happened to NephilimFree, himself, not long ago).
@SecularAstronomer - As I already have pointed out, it's not censorship, so please stop accusing YT of it. I'm not gloating about what happened to you. I'm expressing my lack of sympathy for your predicament due to your past behavior. The only pleasure I'm taking is in the fact that this is just "punishment" based directly upon your behavior.
"I'm not gloating about what happened to you. I'm expressing my lack of sympathy for your predicament due to your past behavior. The only pleasure I'm taking is in the fact that this is just "punishment" based directly upon your behavior."
Exactly; you take pleasure in harm befalling those you don't agree with. That's where we quite thankfully differ. NephilimFree, for instance, treated me very poorly, in our exchange, yet I took no pleasure in seeing people false DMCA him.
@SecularAstronomer - I take pleasure in justice befalling people who deserve it. Thanks for being a typical lying atheist and twisting around what I said in order to misrepresent my statements.
Lol, says the kid who lies to himself on a daily basis, when he pretends to believe in a fairy-tale charater from an ancient X-rated book of Middle Eastern slasher fiction. B)
And again, YouTube either deleted my MBV account by mistake or as a result of a false flagging, and has reinstated the account months ago. So this is unrelated to my perfectly compliant behavior on the MBV channel specifically.
The damn creationists want to brainwash everyone to think their way. NephilimFree is obviously trying to do the almost impossible. Brainwash everyone into thinking EXACTLY like him and/or his brethren.
what if when i try to login it says "Account disabled, please use a different email. " and when i try to go to the channel, it says "This account is suspended." Does this mean Permanently Suspended?
That is incorrect. There is no question that some ERVs have functions in organisms, but there are no wholly functional ERVs—only functional components, with the remainder deleted or mutated into non-functionality.
For instance, the contribution of enJS56A1 and enJS5F16 (of the mere ~20 enJSRVs) to placental growth/differentiation regulation is achieved solely by their env genes with open reading frames (Dunlap et al., 2006; Palmarini et al., 2000).
Although they also have an open gag reading frame (causing gag-gag interaction that restricts pathogenic JSRVs), they are the only ones known to have this (Mura et al., 2004). And every studied enJSRV has a closed pol reading frame (Murcia, Arnaud, & Palmarini, 2007).
Another example is the transcriptional contribution of LTRs to genes' promoters:
1) Not only are most ERVs not at a loci that even makes it possible for them to contribute to transcriptional activity, but most ERVs have recombined into solo LTRs. Since only the LTRs of active full-length ERVs can contribute (Cohen, Lock, & Mager, 2009, p.107), even most ERVs in the right position have no effect. Just as with enJSRVs, these ERVs represent a very small percentage of the whole.
2) The actual genes of these ERVs contribute nothing—only their promoter sequence-rich LTRs do. Again, just as with enJSRVs, these are examples of functional ERV components, rather than functional ERVs.
It is the same with every case observed; again, there are no "functional ERVs;" only a small percentage of ERVs with functional components.
But it's a moot point, because we know that ERVs are insertions:
The hallmark of an insertion is a displacement of chromosomal DNA, and the hallmark of insertion by integrase is the presents of target site duplication, due to the way it attacks the 5' and 3' phosphodiester bonds with an offset of a few base pairs (Skinner et al., 2001). Since ERVs are accompanied by target site duplications and DNA displacement, they are necessarily endogenized/fixed proviral insertions.
So any functional components are necessarily post-insertion exaptations, and the fact that they are necessarily insertion means that they can not be part of any 'original design.' The issue of functionality is simply a red herring, when discussing how ERVs necessitate common ancestry.
For an understanding of scaffolding (p.365-366) and exaptation (p.361-363), including various "paths to exaptation," refer to the first half (p.358-366) of "The Evolution of Complex Organs" by Dr. Gregory (2008).
The information I am spreading is accurate, but when you say that the "ERV prediction is wrong," you are not doing the same, toobsucker.
Cohen, C. J., W. M. Lock, and D. L. Mager. "Endogenous retroviral LTRs as promoters for human genes: a critical assessment." Gene 448.2 (2009): 105-14.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Cohen2009
Dunlap, K. A., M. Palmarini, M. Varela, R. C. Burghardt, K. Hayashi, J. L. Farmer, and T. E. Spencer. "Endogenous retroviruses regulate periimplantation placental growth and differentiation." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103.39 (2006): 14390-5.
Gregory, T. R. "The Evolution of Complex Organs." Evolution: Education and Outreach 1.4 (2008): 358-89.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Gregory2008
Mura, M., P. Murcia, M. Caporale, T. E. Spencer, K. Nagashima, A. Rein, and M. Palmarini. "Late Viral Interference Induced by Transdominant Gag of an Endogenous Retrovirus." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101.30 (2004 Jul 27): 11117-22.
Murcia, P. R., F. Arnaud, and M. Palmarini. "The transdominant endogenous retrovirus enJS56A1 associates with and blocks intracellular trafficking of Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus Gag." J Virol. 81.4 (2007): 1762-72.
Palmarini, M., C. Hallwirth, D. York, C. Murgia, T. De Oliveira, T. Spencer, and H. Fan. "Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of Three Type D Endogenous Retroviruses of Sheep Reveal a Different Cell Tropism from That of the Highly Related Exogenous Jaagsiekte Sheep Retrovirus." J Virol 74.17 (2000 Sep): 8065-76.
Skinner, L. M., M. Sudol, A. L. Harper, and M. Katzman. "Nucleophile Selection for the Endonuclease Activities of Human, Ovine, and Avian Retroviral Integrases." Journal of Biological Chemistry 276.1 (2001): 114-24.
i have had several accounts suspended, these accounts havent had any *nasty* names/ backgrounds/icons ect and have had NO videos that could be flagged,i to have had no warning and all comments removed!!!! crazy
i even mad an account never used it, never added an icon/background and never commented with it, went to it after about 3 months and it was suspended ?
The point is that if this is the case, then you are right. The point is that if we let this type of behavior force us to quit, then they will win. That is one possibility I am not, nor ever will be willing to concede.
I am very disheartened to hear about this Jon. You are by far one of very favorite YouTubers for your unabashed defense of Materialism, Evolution, and Cosmology. I personally have watched many of your videos and have read literally HUNDREDS of your comments on your videos or other users videos or channels. Sometimes we all get a bit aggressive in expressing beliefs, but I have never read any comment by you where you were not at least civil.
Maybe you werent as civil and right as you thought you were. Youtube doesnt suspend channels with no explanation. You had to have received numerous warnings about your conduct. To atheists, your attitudes and comments are innocent because its the norm for you when in actuality your lack of respect and arrogance in addition to your uneccessary aggression is reprehensible.
"Youtube [doesn't] suspend channels with no explanation. You had to have received numerous warnings about your conduct."
That is incorrect on two fronts. Firstly, YouTube's own terms of use states that they do reserve the right to suspend accounts with no warning or e-mail for offenses they deem serious, and harassment would clearly fall in that category. But keep in mind that they also say they use US law regarding those issues as their criteria for determination.
Secondly, there are many firsthand accounts of people that have had their accounts suspended with no such warning. One person that had their account suspended and all their comments deleted by YouTube, put considerable effort into getting their case examined, and eventually YouTube reinstated them and restored their comments. YouTube also sent them an e-mail saying that it turns out the whole thing was an accident on their behalf.
"To atheists, your attitudes and comments are innocent because [it's] the norm for you when in actuality your lack of respect and arrogance in addition to your [unnecessary] aggression is reprehensible."
Regarding the atheists, Christians, Muslims, etc, I often see engaging in "[unnecessary] aggression," I agree that it is reprehensible. But I also find it offensive to just single out atheists as being guilty of this behavior, and to generalize to the degree it appears you are doing now.
Hi, I am sorry to hear about what had happened to your account. You should contact >[dprjones] and ask him and thunderf00t to campaign for youtube to restore your channels. Both of them.
As of yesterday, dprjones is also suspended, thanks to Shawn's doctored video and false allegations (it was probably one of Shawn's followers obeying the last set of command he gave before leaving YouTube).
damn these fanatical morons... religion seems more and more to ma like a self-propagating form of brainwashing, a virus that, after so many generations of.. mutation and speciation, is still with us, sometimes almost symbiotic, most of the times destructive, to knowledge, free thought, to ourselves as a species.
I say we flag the christian videos as "Hate". There should be free speech that doesn't apply to religious christian heresy. Christian heresy should be punishable by death under State Atheism. America should become a evolutionary atheist state.
Sort of a sad awakening for someone who clearly has no idea that there is no freedom of speech on venues like yotube. If you come under scrutiny of the corporate oligarchy and they don't like what you have to say then they can do as they please. You act like user agreements are binding to youtube also. You could put 40 years of your lifes work on youboob and it would mean absolutely zilch if they erased it all.
no-no. Christ doesn't love him. He thinks he is Christ. Just look at how Venom treats any Christian even who so much as questions him as a complete and total apostate or how he seems to think that with his channel gone that Christians in general no longer have a voice on Youtube...
Your videos -- *ALL* of them are extremely valuable. If YouTube wants to be a haven for creationists, then so be it.
Don't lose hope. The importance is the material. If YouTube doesn't know how to foster a community or appreciate quality videos when they see them then perhaps somewhere else it is possible.
I can't remember subscribing to you. I must admit I have unsubscribe from a lot of atheist vs religion channels. This because I do not want to be come part of the personal attacks that lead to people having there accounts closed.
Best to read the TOS before badassing people I say.
I certainly wasn't "badassing" anyone; unless you consider the term to include civil discourse on scientific topics.
And I have read YouTube's terms of service; as well as their privacy policy and community guidelines. My conduct came no where near violating any of them.
It's pity I have not seen the video you are talking about. I prefer to hear what was on the video that read a load of text. I know I personally was not happy last year when someone asked me for a video response to there video. The guy used parts of my video without permission to make his points.
That's interesting. I would have expected him to be open about it and somewhat proud, if he was responsible. Perhaps he isn't responsible.
It is possible that YouTube deleted my account and censored my comments accidentally, as they did, and admitted to doing, with ThatOneQuestion.
I would certainly like to believe that NephilimFree had nothing to do with this, but given high level of dishonesty he displayed in our discussion, I just don't trust him enough to take his word for it.
It hard to call what he does dishonest because he truely believes in what he says, people like VenomfangX and Hovind are dishonest but Neph is just stupid.
I agree that he genuinely believes that the evolutionary model is incorrect and unscientific, and merely does so out of ignorance. But there are two reasons I say he's dishonest:
1) When he is confronted with a specific counterargument that cites supporting research, he finds that he doesn't understand it, or the cited publications. At that point, the honest thing to do is to stop making the argument, until you read the publications and research the counterargument and respond to it. Instead, he ignores both the counterargument and the cited publications, and continues parroting the exact same argument.
2) After I specifically refute his arguments, cite my sources, and ask him to cite his, as well as stop parroting his original arguments until he responds to my counterarguments, he responds like this:
"Address my points. But if you are incapable [or] unwilling to, why should I bother reading a single thing you post?"
As you can see, he pretends our roles are reversed (presumably to save face with any third party spectators).
reupload them here,private. Share them with me & I will upload them to my channel.. I do not [yet] make my own content,& only wish to serve the community,and specifically free & fair speech.
keep harassing youtube. google's alleged (though not evident) ideology is openness and freedom of speech, so keep at them to reopen your account. your videos demonstrate a high level of knowledge of biology and will be missed. i contacted you well over a year ago so i could host your ERV video but i since had a hard drive failure and my website is no longer running :) but it was featured on my website for roughly a year
This makes me sad and pisses me off at the same time. I suggest you re-upload the videos (on YT or somewhere else) so that everyone else can mirror them. Even if your account doesn't get reinstated at least the content will be spread.
It is really lame to see somethings like this happen on youtube. But i hope you don't give up, and start uploading those video's and starting to comment what you stand for again! You have many fans to worry about, and don't take this 'ban' personally, cuz they attacked your fans with this too!
It seems you tube is no longer the bastion of free speech it once was prior to Google taking it over..... its so very saddening. I'm very sorry for your loss. It is reminiscent of a a very similar situation to yours Coctupus had found himself in If you haven't already you should contact the league of reason. Also if u have copies of the removed videos i would be happy to mirror them on my channel.
Is it really that unbelievable that the people who monitor Youtube are just as likely to be the same defensive and malicious Theists populate 90% of the world? Its typical.
The spirit of anti-intellectualism is alive and well in our soon to be 3d world country. I wonder if they ever suspended any of the faithful that used filthy language, and/or wishes for my death, when responding to me.
so sorry to hear about this happening to you but I have to say it doesn't surprise me at all. If you ran around on cam in a cat suit YT would love you but show the slightest bit of intellect they ban, suspend and/or delete. Is ignorance really bliss or just needed to be a YouTuber?
Thank you very much for this information. I was quite pessimistic about the comments being restored, even upon reinstatement, and this definitely gives me a reason to persist.
I think I know exactly how you feel, because I was very annoyed at seeing ALL of my comments from several years being stripped away from the channel as if they were plagued or something.
Mine came back when I was reinstated, and I really hope yours return as well!
I recently signed up to a forum site but then I left because the mods were trigger happy with censorship. But what has happened to you is far worse. I'm seriously thinking about leaving Youtube because of this shit. But then again, what's the point? It ain't gonna make a difference. Try posting your videos on Dramatube (dot) net.
Google has retracted that as its motto associated with their re-entering the Chinese search engine market with a censored version (apparently nothing interesting happened in 1989 in Tianmen Square.)
Google is a corporation. They have stockholders. Little can be done. Moneyed interests are mechanically incompatible with freedom of speech.
My main problem with the way information has been centralized (e.g. wikipedia, youtube, etc) is that it makes it a juicy target for manipulation by extremists and conmen of all stripes.
It also makes it quite easily to delete not only debate, but any sign there was a debate - the internet needs to get back to its decentralized roots.
That is a good idea. Fortunately, I've already been doing that, and even better; I also save almost every comment I type in Word documents, and still have the deleted ones on my hard drive right now.
This form of censorship has got to stop. Its terrible to think that without even giving you a reason, they took away your hard work and even deleted all your comments!
I'm such a very small fish in this big ocean, but I'll do what I can to help. I agree with Newitt888 and RouletteRog, talk to these folks. They may be able to help. Hang in there!
Sorry to hear about this. You should get other prominent youtube users to upload your old videos and get you new subscribers. You might just be able to turn a negative into a positive that way and get your material out to more creationists!
I agree with Newitt888, more-or-less... This wouldn't be DMCA abuse, though a lot of creationists use that erroneously, but were I in your situation I would contact DPRJones and the guys on the DMCAAbuse channel. This may be right up their alley. At any rate, they've been in the trenches with YouTube quite a bit on this.
I was in a similar situation. I was trolled by someone that had several accounts and kept on bothering me. I e-mailed youtube requesting that this person be ip banned. Youtube messaged me back pretty much saying that they deleted all of his comments and suspended the account. This was over 2 years ago. So it is possible.
Thank you for telling me this, TheAtheistPaladin. All things considered, I am now more convinced than ever that my suspension is the work of NephilimFree.
It only took a day for them to respond. However, I doubt that there even was an ip ban. It felt very automated. So I agree that you are justified in believing that NephilimFree did a similar complaint. Apparently he realized that blocking you wasn't going to do any good.
If he did do it, than how did he contact youtube in order to expedite this process? youtube isn't exactly the easiest to get a hold of, let alone for any kind of help.....
Like I said, that was over two years ago. Youtube support back then wasn't a massive rat maze as it is now. I just guess NephilimFree found a way to get the cheese.
I liked your videos and thought they constituted great teaching material.
Assuming there were no copyright infringements or other I.P. issues tied to the cool graphics contained in the presentations, what other reason there could be - aside from opposition to the content itself by religious fundamentalists?
Try to keep up the good work, nonetheless. We rational thinkers appreciate you and your good work.
Comment removed
gingergiblet 2 weeks ago
Thats not true. Youtube sends a warning message if a user receives a strike for posting spam and other bad comments.
CrazyBrandondorf 9 months ago
@CrazyBrandondorf
I have a first hand account of someone that had the same thing happen to him as a result of a later admitted mistake on YouTube's behalf. They didn't send him any notification either. So yes; it is true.
SecularAstronomer 9 months ago
Ever thought about contacting youtube directly?
trultima 11 months ago 3
I believe your old account was restored... with vids... the links work anyway....
BlitzNeko 1 year ago
Happened to my oldest yt account too, i had about 400 videos, all were removed.
supersaninpikachu 1 year ago
I tend to agree with you on the points about free speech. I may disagree with you on what you say, but to censor it because it's unpopular is not fair. However, Youtube is not the federal government. They are a business and have the right to do with it as they will. Perhaps you could move your discussion to private board where you can control the conversation.
asatruteacher 1 year ago
@JMch hey everybody has the right to believe in whatever they want
DMNC21 1 year ago
hi, sorry to bother you, but my account was taken down the same also .. I see you got the channel back, how did you manage to do that ? .. I would love to be able to get mine back...
JENAM1C 1 year ago
Do you see this ===> .
That's the tiny violin I'm playing for you.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
So you only advocate the right to free speech and expression of yourself or those you agree with? Since you disagreed with the existence of my other channel, it's a victory for anything else I say in any other venue to be systematically removed?
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - Sorry, but that argument doesn't work here. You have no right to free speech here. You have the privilege of speech only to the extent which YT affords you and YT can revoke that privilege at any time for any reason. (The same with GodTube.) You yourself have admitted that this wasn't the result of false-flagging, so obviously you ran afoul of YT's policies. Instead feigning innocence and complaining about YT, maybe you should carefully examine your own behavior.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
"Sorry, but that argument doesn't work here. You have no right to free speech here. You have the privilege of speech only to the extent which YT affords you and YT can revoke that privilege at any time for any reason. (The same with GodTube.) … As I already have pointed out, it's not censorship, so please stop accusing YT of it."
No, that argument doesn't work, as it addresses an argument I never made. I never said YouTube doesn't have the right to censor.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
And yes, right or wrong (I say wrong) it is perfectly legal censorship on YouTube's behalf. Please look up the word in a dictionary: "to suppress or delete as objectionable." YouTube could even decide to ban certain races of people, if they wanted. It would be legal, but not necessarily acceptable in the eyes of most.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - It's not censorship when you have no inherent right to post whatever you want. If a cop takes away you protest sign on a public sidewalk, that's censorship. When a private company asks you to remove your sign (and yourself) from their property, that's not censorship.
JMcH 1 year ago
The point I was actually making is that it could easily be inferred from your callous response to legal, yet unprovoked censorship (with no discernable justification) of one that you disagree with, that you only support the speech/expression rights of those you agree with.
So I asked you if this was the case. No response.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - It's your assertion that this was "unprovoked." I'm sure YouTube would beg to differ.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
No, you're not sure that Youtube would beg to differ. You're lying and projecting your own desires.
elvishairdude12 1 year ago
@elvishairdude12 - YouTube does nothing that is unprovoked. They don't just randomly and senselessly remove people's accounts.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH And the government doesn't lie to people.
Synthmilk 1 year ago
@Synthmilk - Thanks for the non sequitur.
JMcH 1 year ago
"You yourself have admitted that this wasn't the result of false-flagging, so obviously you ran afoul of YT's policies. Instead feigning innocence and complaining about YT, maybe you should carefully examine your own behavior."
Your assumption is unfounded. I know for a fact that I violated no policies on that channel (either in my two uploaded videos or in any comment section).
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - How can you know for a fact that you didn't violate any policies when you admit you don't really know why they took the channel down?
I bet you would claim, too, that you didn't violate any policies on GodTube with your SoldierInGodsArmy account there.
JMcH 1 year ago
I have a first hand account of someone that had the same thing happen to him as a result of a later admitted mistake on YouTube's behalf.
I also have a first hand account that YouTube sometimes responds to a mere alleging of harassment by doing this as well. And I know that I never harassed NephilimFree, or anyone else.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
It is obvious that YouTube either deleted my MBV account by mistake or as a result of false claims. This is corroborated by the fact that YouTube reinstated the account months ago.
But I doubt you will consider any of this, JMcH, as your mind seems to be quite made up about me, as a whole (so to speak).
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SecularAstronomer
Most likely, he flagged all of your comments as spam. If enough people flag your comments as spam then I think your account can be deleted.
elvishairdude12 1 year ago
Well, unlike some, I agree with the statement that "the only way to make sure people you agree with can speak is to support the rights of people you don't agree with (Eleanor Norton)," and would never sink so low as to take pleasure in, or gloat about, the censorship of anyone (like what happened to NephilimFree, himself, not long ago).
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - As I already have pointed out, it's not censorship, so please stop accusing YT of it. I'm not gloating about what happened to you. I'm expressing my lack of sympathy for your predicament due to your past behavior. The only pleasure I'm taking is in the fact that this is just "punishment" based directly upon your behavior.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
"I'm not gloating about what happened to you. I'm expressing my lack of sympathy for your predicament due to your past behavior. The only pleasure I'm taking is in the fact that this is just "punishment" based directly upon your behavior."
Exactly; you take pleasure in harm befalling those you don't agree with. That's where we quite thankfully differ. NephilimFree, for instance, treated me very poorly, in our exchange, yet I took no pleasure in seeing people false DMCA him.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@SecularAstronomer - I take pleasure in justice befalling people who deserve it. Thanks for being a typical lying atheist and twisting around what I said in order to misrepresent my statements.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
Lol, says the kid who lies to himself on a daily basis, when he pretends to believe in a fairy-tale charater from an ancient X-rated book of Middle Eastern slasher fiction. B)
elvishairdude12 1 year ago
@elvishairdude12 - Please continue to prove my statements about atheists to be 100% true. Thanks.
JMcH 1 year ago
@JMcH
The truth about your cultic worldview hurts I guess :/
elvishairdude12 1 year ago
@elvishairdude12 - What truth? You've provided nothing but lies and penis jokes.
JMcH 1 year ago
And again, YouTube either deleted my MBV account by mistake or as a result of a false flagging, and has reinstated the account months ago. So this is unrelated to my perfectly compliant behavior on the MBV channel specifically.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
@JMcH
It looks more like your penis - except it's a little longer than I expected.
elvishairdude12 1 year ago
@elvishairdude12 - Wow. A penis joke. Did you think that one up all by yourself?
JMcH 1 year ago
Dont leave I love your videos
runningweasel86 1 year ago
Hang in there SA!
Science WILL win.
And yes-censorship sucks but I don't have an answer for you on that.
Best of luck, Stay thoughtful.
1ListerofSmeg 1 year ago
The damn creationists want to brainwash everyone to think their way. NephilimFree is obviously trying to do the almost impossible. Brainwash everyone into thinking EXACTLY like him and/or his brethren.
Worldpeacekid 1 year ago
i came here trying to find a censored version of an eminem song :D thats too bad tho.
KittenzScreamoBand 1 year ago
what if when i try to login it says "Account disabled, please use a different email. " and when i try to go to the channel, it says "This account is suspended." Does this mean Permanently Suspended?
ThisIsntMyAccountShh 1 year ago
Maybe because your spreading false information. ERVs have been recently found to code for things. just as with JUNK DNA, this ERV prediction is wrong
toobsucker 1 year ago
@toobsucker
That is incorrect. There is no question that some ERVs have functions in organisms, but there are no wholly functional ERVs—only functional components, with the remainder deleted or mutated into non-functionality.
For instance, the contribution of enJS56A1 and enJS5F16 (of the mere ~20 enJSRVs) to placental growth/differentiation regulation is achieved solely by their env genes with open reading frames (Dunlap et al., 2006; Palmarini et al., 2000).
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
Although they also have an open gag reading frame (causing gag-gag interaction that restricts pathogenic JSRVs), they are the only ones known to have this (Mura et al., 2004). And every studied enJSRV has a closed pol reading frame (Murcia, Arnaud, & Palmarini, 2007).
Another example is the transcriptional contribution of LTRs to genes' promoters:
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
1) Not only are most ERVs not at a loci that even makes it possible for them to contribute to transcriptional activity, but most ERVs have recombined into solo LTRs. Since only the LTRs of active full-length ERVs can contribute (Cohen, Lock, & Mager, 2009, p.107), even most ERVs in the right position have no effect. Just as with enJSRVs, these ERVs represent a very small percentage of the whole.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
2) The actual genes of these ERVs contribute nothing—only their promoter sequence-rich LTRs do. Again, just as with enJSRVs, these are examples of functional ERV components, rather than functional ERVs.
It is the same with every case observed; again, there are no "functional ERVs;" only a small percentage of ERVs with functional components.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
But it's a moot point, because we know that ERVs are insertions:
The hallmark of an insertion is a displacement of chromosomal DNA, and the hallmark of insertion by integrase is the presents of target site duplication, due to the way it attacks the 5' and 3' phosphodiester bonds with an offset of a few base pairs (Skinner et al., 2001). Since ERVs are accompanied by target site duplications and DNA displacement, they are necessarily endogenized/fixed proviral insertions.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
So any functional components are necessarily post-insertion exaptations, and the fact that they are necessarily insertion means that they can not be part of any 'original design.' The issue of functionality is simply a red herring, when discussing how ERVs necessitate common ancestry.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
For an understanding of scaffolding (p.365-366) and exaptation (p.361-363), including various "paths to exaptation," refer to the first half (p.358-366) of "The Evolution of Complex Organs" by Dr. Gregory (2008).
The information I am spreading is accurate, but when you say that the "ERV prediction is wrong," you are not doing the same, toobsucker.
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
References
Cohen, C. J., W. M. Lock, and D. L. Mager. "Endogenous retroviral LTRs as promoters for human genes: a critical assessment." Gene 448.2 (2009): 105-14.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Cohen2009
Dunlap, K. A., M. Palmarini, M. Varela, R. C. Burghardt, K. Hayashi, J. L. Farmer, and T. E. Spencer. "Endogenous retroviruses regulate periimplantation placental growth and differentiation." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103.39 (2006): 14390-5.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Dunlap2006
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
Gregory, T. R. "The Evolution of Complex Organs." Evolution: Education and Outreach 1.4 (2008): 358-89.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Gregory2008
Mura, M., P. Murcia, M. Caporale, T. E. Spencer, K. Nagashima, A. Rein, and M. Palmarini. "Late Viral Interference Induced by Transdominant Gag of an Endogenous Retrovirus." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101.30 (2004 Jul 27): 11117-22.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Mura2004
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
Murcia, P. R., F. Arnaud, and M. Palmarini. "The transdominant endogenous retrovirus enJS56A1 associates with and blocks intracellular trafficking of Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus Gag." J Virol. 81.4 (2007): 1762-72.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Murcia2007
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
Palmarini, M., C. Hallwirth, D. York, C. Murgia, T. De Oliveira, T. Spencer, and H. Fan. "Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of Three Type D Endogenous Retroviruses of Sheep Reveal a Different Cell Tropism from That of the Highly Related Exogenous Jaagsiekte Sheep Retrovirus." J Virol 74.17 (2000 Sep): 8065-76.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Palmarini2000
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
Skinner, L. M., M. Sudol, A. L. Harper, and M. Katzman. "Nucleophile Selection for the Endonuclease Activities of Human, Ovine, and Avian Retroviral Integrases." Journal of Biological Chemistry 276.1 (2001): 114-24.
tinyurl(DOT)com/Skinner2001
SecularAstronomer 1 year ago
i have had several accounts suspended, these accounts havent had any *nasty* names/ backgrounds/icons ect and have had NO videos that could be flagged,i to have had no warning and all comments removed!!!! crazy
i even mad an account never used it, never added an icon/background and never commented with it, went to it after about 3 months and it was suspended ?
PizzaGeezer 1 year ago
i am a freak about ERV's i think they use them to change people in to full robotic form.
FULLR0B0TICFORM 1 year ago
I LOVE YOUR WORK, sorry about youtube hope you can share your work somewhere safer
OjibweWonder 1 year ago
anyone else ever have a problem with comments not posting? happens to me daily and im guessing its youtube censoring me.
iAMr3VOLution1 1 year ago
The point is that if this is the case, then you are right. The point is that if we let this type of behavior force us to quit, then they will win. That is one possibility I am not, nor ever will be willing to concede.
TheWeizOne 2 years ago
Maybe a creationist got a job at YouTube and now YouTube is infected with a loose cannon.
WarmWeatherGuy 2 years ago
The day creationists and idiotes begin to run Youtube, it will loose 99% of its users.
Sorry to hear what happend here. But it is to rise after every fall that is important, not to never fall.
daarco2 2 years ago
I am very disheartened to hear about this Jon. You are by far one of very favorite YouTubers for your unabashed defense of Materialism, Evolution, and Cosmology. I personally have watched many of your videos and have read literally HUNDREDS of your comments on your videos or other users videos or channels. Sometimes we all get a bit aggressive in expressing beliefs, but I have never read any comment by you where you were not at least civil.
Those Who Can Should Mirror All Your Videos!
JohnHasSeriousQ 2 years ago
I was wondering what happened to your old account. You must have pissed off the creationists something awful.
In any case, you should keep at it. Continue exposing creationist propaganda for what it is.
Zdrazy 2 years ago
What's the deal here? Don't you want the information in your videos to be seeded and spread?
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Maybe you werent as civil and right as you thought you were. Youtube doesnt suspend channels with no explanation. You had to have received numerous warnings about your conduct. To atheists, your attitudes and comments are innocent because its the norm for you when in actuality your lack of respect and arrogance in addition to your uneccessary aggression is reprehensible.
lindsey2021 2 years ago
"Maybe you [weren't] as civil and right as you thought you were."
I do know I was civil, as I was the one that authored the statements.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
"Youtube [doesn't] suspend channels with no explanation. You had to have received numerous warnings about your conduct."
That is incorrect on two fronts. Firstly, YouTube's own terms of use states that they do reserve the right to suspend accounts with no warning or e-mail for offenses they deem serious, and harassment would clearly fall in that category. But keep in mind that they also say they use US law regarding those issues as their criteria for determination.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
Secondly, there are many firsthand accounts of people that have had their accounts suspended with no such warning. One person that had their account suspended and all their comments deleted by YouTube, put considerable effort into getting their case examined, and eventually YouTube reinstated them and restored their comments. YouTube also sent them an e-mail saying that it turns out the whole thing was an accident on their behalf.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
"To atheists, your attitudes and comments are innocent because [it's] the norm for you when in actuality your lack of respect and arrogance in addition to your [unnecessary] aggression is reprehensible."
Regarding the atheists, Christians, Muslims, etc, I often see engaging in "[unnecessary] aggression," I agree that it is reprehensible. But I also find it offensive to just single out atheists as being guilty of this behavior, and to generalize to the degree it appears you are doing now.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
Don't give up mate. I second the suggestion to drop Tunderfoot a line. I'm sure he would be more than happy to give this the publicity it deserves.
FWIW I will drop him a line myself.
Tapecutter59 2 years ago
That's a good idea. Tfoot would eat this up.
opiates 2 years ago
Contact the BBB!
zlafrance24 2 years ago
Don't let them win, I'll mirror your old videos and try to get all the major players to take an interest.
TheScienceFoundation 2 years ago
Do you still have the videos? They should be mirrored by as many people as possible now
OperationOperafox 2 years ago
Hi, I am sorry to hear about what had happened to your account. You should contact >[dprjones] and ask him and thunderf00t to campaign for youtube to restore your channels. Both of them.
kenshin0694 2 years ago
As of yesterday, dprjones is also suspended, thanks to Shawn's doctored video and false allegations (it was probably one of Shawn's followers obeying the last set of command he gave before leaving YouTube).
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
Fortunately, he has already been reinstated. (yup; it was Shawn again)
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
Argh. This really makes me angry.
TheSensuousAtheist 2 years ago
You Tube censors are probably all zombie worshippers.
maxpolaris99 2 years ago 3
damn these fanatical morons... religion seems more and more to ma like a self-propagating form of brainwashing, a virus that, after so many generations of.. mutation and speciation, is still with us, sometimes almost symbiotic, most of the times destructive, to knowledge, free thought, to ourselves as a species.
synth3s1s 2 years ago 3
I say we flag the christian videos as "Hate". There should be free speech that doesn't apply to religious christian heresy. Christian heresy should be punishable by death under State Atheism. America should become a evolutionary atheist state.
Long live State Atheism.
Jtaylor1 2 years ago
Oh youtube, will you ever learn......
They are so destructive and such a willing tool for anyone trying to limit free speech. It is somewhat disgusting.
Clausfarre 2 years ago 16
Added to the play list
rozeboosje 2 years ago
Sort of a sad awakening for someone who clearly has no idea that there is no freedom of speech on venues like yotube. If you come under scrutiny of the corporate oligarchy and they don't like what you have to say then they can do as they please. You act like user agreements are binding to youtube also. You could put 40 years of your lifes work on youboob and it would mean absolutely zilch if they erased it all.
Saromatae 2 years ago
The least YouTube could do is explain which terms of service you have unwittingly transgressed so that you don't repeat the error.
For all their claims of a higher morality, the religious fundamentalists resort to their dirty, underhand tricks at the drop of a hat.
thatgaybloke 2 years ago 3
btw VenomfangX is not dishonest, he's mentally retarded. When he says Christ loves him, he's telling the truth. So does Napoleon and Santa.
AziMeX 2 years ago
no-no. Christ doesn't love him. He thinks he is Christ. Just look at how Venom treats any Christian even who so much as questions him as a complete and total apostate or how he seems to think that with his channel gone that Christians in general no longer have a voice on Youtube...
BalzacCinema 2 years ago 2
PM me a link to your videos. I will mirror them, and this one.
IAmARationalApe 2 years ago
This is absurd. You need to make sure more people are aware of this!
Minttzz 2 years ago
Your videos -- *ALL* of them are extremely valuable. If YouTube wants to be a haven for creationists, then so be it.
Don't lose hope. The importance is the material. If YouTube doesn't know how to foster a community or appreciate quality videos when they see them then perhaps somewhere else it is possible.
websnarf 2 years ago 2
I can't remember subscribing to you. I must admit I have unsubscribe from a lot of atheist vs religion channels. This because I do not want to be come part of the personal attacks that lead to people having there accounts closed.
Best to read the TOS before badassing people I say.
MicrosoftsourceCode 2 years ago
I certainly wasn't "badassing" anyone; unless you consider the term to include civil discourse on scientific topics.
And I have read YouTube's terms of service; as well as their privacy policy and community guidelines. My conduct came no where near violating any of them.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
It's pity I have not seen the video you are talking about. I prefer to hear what was on the video that read a load of text. I know I personally was not happy last year when someone asked me for a video response to there video. The guy used parts of my video without permission to make his points.
MicrosoftsourceCode 2 years ago
I asked Neph if he new anything about you getting kicked off youtube and he said that he didn't.
sweatytoothmadman 2 years ago
That's interesting. I would have expected him to be open about it and somewhat proud, if he was responsible. Perhaps he isn't responsible.
It is possible that YouTube deleted my account and censored my comments accidentally, as they did, and admitted to doing, with ThatOneQuestion.
I would certainly like to believe that NephilimFree had nothing to do with this, but given high level of dishonesty he displayed in our discussion, I just don't trust him enough to take his word for it.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
"given high level of dishonesty "
It hard to call what he does dishonest because he truely believes in what he says, people like VenomfangX and Hovind are dishonest but Neph is just stupid.
sweatytoothmadman 2 years ago
I agree that he genuinely believes that the evolutionary model is incorrect and unscientific, and merely does so out of ignorance. But there are two reasons I say he's dishonest:
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
1) When he is confronted with a specific counterargument that cites supporting research, he finds that he doesn't understand it, or the cited publications. At that point, the honest thing to do is to stop making the argument, until you read the publications and research the counterargument and respond to it. Instead, he ignores both the counterargument and the cited publications, and continues parroting the exact same argument.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
2) After I specifically refute his arguments, cite my sources, and ask him to cite his, as well as stop parroting his original arguments until he responds to my counterarguments, he responds like this:
"Address my points. But if you are incapable [or] unwilling to, why should I bother reading a single thing you post?"
As you can see, he pretends our roles are reversed (presumably to save face with any third party spectators).
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
@sweatytoothmadman: No -- you can tell the difference between the dishonest and the pure stupid. NephilemFree is clearly in the dishonest camp.
websnarf 2 years ago
reupload them here,private. Share them with me & I will upload them to my channel.. I do not [yet] make my own content,& only wish to serve the community,and specifically free & fair speech.
AtheistCitizen 2 years ago
let's keep harassing YouTube. let's get on that change YouTube for 2010 band wagon.
kenshin304 2 years ago
keep harassing youtube. google's alleged (though not evident) ideology is openness and freedom of speech, so keep at them to reopen your account. your videos demonstrate a high level of knowledge of biology and will be missed. i contacted you well over a year ago so i could host your ERV video but i since had a hard drive failure and my website is no longer running :) but it was featured on my website for roughly a year
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
This makes me sad and pisses me off at the same time. I suggest you re-upload the videos (on YT or somewhere else) so that everyone else can mirror them. Even if your account doesn't get reinstated at least the content will be spread.
Zoppellaccia 2 years ago
It is really lame to see somethings like this happen on youtube. But i hope you don't give up, and start uploading those video's and starting to comment what you stand for again! You have many fans to worry about, and don't take this 'ban' personally, cuz they attacked your fans with this too!
sonnyboy209 2 years ago
It seems you tube is no longer the bastion of free speech it once was prior to Google taking it over..... its so very saddening. I'm very sorry for your loss. It is reminiscent of a a very similar situation to yours Coctupus had found himself in If you haven't already you should contact the league of reason. Also if u have copies of the removed videos i would be happy to mirror them on my channel.
l3ft0v3rcr4ck 2 years ago
What a joke. I can't believe this crap.
solitary200 2 years ago
Is it really that unbelievable that the people who monitor Youtube are just as likely to be the same defensive and malicious Theists populate 90% of the world? Its typical.
mithrandel111 2 years ago
*that populate
mithrandel111 2 years ago
Thsi is so wrong, on so many levels.
YT is as out of control as Political Correctness!
YT=/= Freedom of speech
YT = Freedom from speech!
MilitantPeaceist 2 years ago
The spirit of anti-intellectualism is alive and well in our soon to be 3d world country. I wonder if they ever suspended any of the faithful that used filthy language, and/or wishes for my death, when responding to me.
Is there another option other than Y.T.?
pmarie2003 2 years ago
damn, thats crazy sh*t
juggaloryan3 2 years ago
I am mirroring your video. We must work to re-instate your lost account. We can't let this kind of thing stand.
Please create a temporary account for your molecular bio vids, and re-upload them.
qYnBzWFc 2 years ago
so sorry to hear about this happening to you but I have to say it doesn't surprise me at all. If you ran around on cam in a cat suit YT would love you but show the slightest bit of intellect they ban, suspend and/or delete. Is ignorance really bliss or just needed to be a YouTuber?
MortishaCassavetes 2 years ago
What the ..... ?
This is all shades of wrong.
askegg 2 years ago
Yeah, I was suspended once too, and I'd spent years on a channel. All 7000 some comments were gone.
Later I was reinstated because of, what they say, was a technical issue, they were all restored back to where they were.
So... there is that, at least. Your comments might return when you are reinstated.
ThatOneQuestion 2 years ago
Thank you very much for this information. I was quite pessimistic about the comments being restored, even upon reinstatement, and this definitely gives me a reason to persist.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
Glad that gave you hope =)
I think I know exactly how you feel, because I was very annoyed at seeing ALL of my comments from several years being stripped away from the channel as if they were plagued or something.
Mine came back when I was reinstated, and I really hope yours return as well!
Good luck!!
ThatOneQuestion 2 years ago
I wish you can upload your videos again. Really, we must not let the dumb people think they are the only ones in youtube!
superCatia 2 years ago
When I was DMCA'd, my comments were all deleted as well; it's clearly automatic.
1RadicalOne 2 years ago
"I really don't know how much longer I can keep putting work into a site that takes it all away without thinking twice."
That's much worse than just fighting an uphill battle. Isn't there any way to contest this?
andr0oS 2 years ago
@andr0oS
There is. I kept emailing multiple departments/services in youtube to ask that they take a look into my situation, because I knew it wasn't right.
I eventually got a response, and they reopened my account after realizing something was wrong.
...but it took a while
ThatOneQuestion 2 years ago
I suppose it could have been worse, though it's not like this kind of thing should be happening in the first place.
andr0oS 2 years ago
I recently signed up to a forum site but then I left because the mods were trigger happy with censorship. But what has happened to you is far worse. I'm seriously thinking about leaving Youtube because of this shit. But then again, what's the point? It ain't gonna make a difference. Try posting your videos on Dramatube (dot) net.
Justinfhtube 2 years ago
Did you cite research which was unpublished, etc?
WillSKB88 2 years ago
No. And much of what I cited was open-access.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
You pissed on an advertiser or one of the major media umbrella's executives.
TheGrowdaddy 2 years ago
creationist + Youtube = evil
RevDevilin 2 years ago
I think it is highly l;ikly that there are creationist forces working covertly within you tubes set up.
ooglebydoogleby 2 years ago
Jebus moles, christian jihadists trying to bring down YT from the inside?
I would find it difficult NOT to beleive that possible. The deluded zealots will stop at nothing in their "War on Reason."
ONQproductions 2 years ago
Apparently they are everywhere. Its rather popular apparently with those who preffer to trust faith in the unseen than the seen
ooglebydoogleby 2 years ago
Youtube and google have an interesting way of applying "Do no evil."
I think their motto is just some marketing scam to make people think they are a good corporation.
thegoodlocust 2 years ago
Google has retracted that as its motto associated with their re-entering the Chinese search engine market with a censored version (apparently nothing interesting happened in 1989 in Tianmen Square.)
Google is a corporation. They have stockholders. Little can be done. Moneyed interests are mechanically incompatible with freedom of speech.
websnarf 2 years ago
My main problem with the way information has been centralized (e.g. wikipedia, youtube, etc) is that it makes it a juicy target for manipulation by extremists and conmen of all stripes.
It also makes it quite easily to delete not only debate, but any sign there was a debate - the internet needs to get back to its decentralized roots.
thegoodlocust 2 years ago 15
I totally agree with you..
SIGA...I suggest that you create a website and host your vids on that, while posting on here at the same time.
Creationists have one quality that rational human beings do not have, and that is the ability to band together, like a mass of blind zombies.
You need to publicise this as much as you can. I will also gladly mirror any videos, as I'm sure a lot of people here will.
There is strength in numbers.
AziMeX 2 years ago
@thegoodlocust: Good insight.
websnarf 2 years ago
They didn't even send you a mesage?
Unbelievable!
DeletedDelusion 2 years ago
Save every video file you make to disc and set up a backup account just in case.
Christheatheist1 2 years ago
That is a good idea. Fortunately, I've already been doing that, and even better; I also save almost every comment I type in Word documents, and still have the deleted ones on my hard drive right now.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
That is why you shouldn't feed the trolls. Sorry to hear that though
WorBlux 2 years ago
dont give up hope!!
someonesperson 2 years ago
Oh no!
This form of censorship has got to stop. Its terrible to think that without even giving you a reason, they took away your hard work and even deleted all your comments!
I'm such a very small fish in this big ocean, but I'll do what I can to help. I agree with Newitt888 and RouletteRog, talk to these folks. They may be able to help. Hang in there!
phenixwryter 2 years ago
Support dude! ... One partial solution (used by others) -
Upload your vids to another site and post a link here. You have a back up that way.
As for the comment removal, I've not hear of that before. ????
Danmill23 2 years ago
Sorry to hear about this. You should get other prominent youtube users to upload your old videos and get you new subscribers. You might just be able to turn a negative into a positive that way and get your material out to more creationists!
niqueth 2 years ago
I agree with Newitt888, more-or-less... This wouldn't be DMCA abuse, though a lot of creationists use that erroneously, but were I in your situation I would contact DPRJones and the guys on the DMCAAbuse channel. This may be right up their alley. At any rate, they've been in the trenches with YouTube quite a bit on this.
RouletteRog 2 years ago
I was in a similar situation. I was trolled by someone that had several accounts and kept on bothering me. I e-mailed youtube requesting that this person be ip banned. Youtube messaged me back pretty much saying that they deleted all of his comments and suspended the account. This was over 2 years ago. So it is possible.
TheAtheistPaladin 2 years ago
Thank you for telling me this, TheAtheistPaladin. All things considered, I am now more convinced than ever that my suspension is the work of NephilimFree.
SecularAstronomer 2 years ago
It only took a day for them to respond. However, I doubt that there even was an ip ban. It felt very automated. So I agree that you are justified in believing that NephilimFree did a similar complaint. Apparently he realized that blocking you wasn't going to do any good.
TheAtheistPaladin 2 years ago
If he did do it, than how did he contact youtube in order to expedite this process? youtube isn't exactly the easiest to get a hold of, let alone for any kind of help.....
7othestars 2 years ago
Like I said, that was over two years ago. Youtube support back then wasn't a massive rat maze as it is now. I just guess NephilimFree found a way to get the cheese.
TheAtheistPaladin 2 years ago
I liked your videos and thought they constituted great teaching material.
Assuming there were no copyright infringements or other I.P. issues tied to the cool graphics contained in the presentations, what other reason there could be - aside from opposition to the content itself by religious fundamentalists?
Try to keep up the good work, nonetheless. We rational thinkers appreciate you and your good work.
tripleVeeVee 2 years ago
The fuck?
GenerationXeroFilms 2 years ago
WTF? Fucking youtube...
GwydionMapDon 2 years ago
If you haven't already, get in touch with AndromedasWake and the League of Reason about this.
Newitt888 2 years ago
as well as user rozeboosje
achtungcircus 2 years ago
freespeechvids
seriouslymatsteele 2 years ago
WTF? O.o
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago