Whatever; still this video shows what Muslims do best. This proves just how peaceful a religion Islam really is. All of those hijakers were devout Muslims; especially the pilots.
This type of speculation is worthless. What a person "would have done", how they "should have reacted", why they moved the camera this way not that way--this kind of "evidence" amounts to nothing.
@existenceisfake No one is saying this is evidence. Is it bad to ask questions. The video is suspicious. Hezarkhani himself is not allowed to talk about the video, call him :D
@LithuanianGuitar The title says "3 more clues". A "clue" is evidence of something. Is it "bad" to ask questions? No, but worthless speculation is still worthless.
@existenceisfake Clue - "Something that serves to guide or direct in the solution of a problem or mystery." Found that in a dictionary. It's definately not the meaning of 'evidence' lol. Much closer to 'question' than to evidence. Or in between maybe. Also, this ain't worthless speculation. This video begs to ask questions.
@LithuanianGuitar Webster's for "evidence" definition 1. a : "an outward sign : indication". I believe a clue is an outward sign. Regardless, this is neither evidence nor clue. It's a biased interpretation--and it's meaningless.
@existenceisfake Evidence is evidence. Based on arguments. If this video was presented as evidence of fakery, believe me, you would have seen a word in the video, called 'evidence'.
@LithuanianGuitar The fact that you want to argue semantics is evidence that you missed my original point--which is--the biased speculating being presented here as "clues" is nothing of the sort. It's nonsense. To compare something you BELIEVE Hezarkhani did or didn't do to what a "normal person" WOULD HAVE done is futile. Why? Because there is no way to know what he was really doing or thinking, and there is no such thing as a normal person's reaction to a shocking and horrifying event..
@existenceisfake No nonsense at all. You clearly don't know what clue is even when I presented it to you. THIS IS NOT MEANT TO BE EVIDENCE IN ANY MEANS. I understand your point. It's clues and to me, the video is suspicious. No people filmed around, superb aim at the alleged plane. If you put it together with some videos that have been proven fake, for eg. Fairbanks, Naudet (video and audio fakery), the word 'pointless' doesn't really fit here. Clues are clues and they beg questions.
@LithuanianGuitar You're clueless. There are formal and informal uses for the term, "evidence". I provided you with one definition--an outward sign or indication. I have never asserted that this video was trying to propose some kind of formal or forensically tenable "evidence" or proof. Is it intended as evidence--of something? Absolutely. It is trying to make EVIDENT that the Hezarkhani footage is suspicious. Because it relies purely on subjective interpretation, it fails.
@existenceisfake This video didn't prove that the shot of M. Hezarkhani is fake. It looks like you are clueless after all. You see, the video doesn't try to make you immediately think that the shot is fake, it begs you asking questions. 'Clue' and 'evidence' are 2 different things. This video doesn't need any evidence that the shot is suspicious since it begs asking questions even if it's subjective. Go call Hezarkhani himself. He is not even allowed to talk about the video. I wonder why...
@LithuanianGuitar Nice lecture, but you're wrong. A clue is a kind of evidence.
Webster's: clue: "Something that guides through an intricate procedure or maze of difficulties; specifically : a piece of EVIDENCE that leads one toward the solution of a problem."
Oxford:: clue: "That which points the way, indicates a solution, or puts one on the track of a discovery; a key. Esp. a piece of EVIDENCE useful in the detection of a crime."
@existenceisfake A piece of evidence, but NOT A COMPLETE EVIDENCE or a SOLUTION. Got that? No one lacks anything, just these 911 images have a major lack of reality :). The video is not evidence of it. The clues provided here lead to the questions that can lead to the evidence. Now we only have to ask M. Hezarkhani himself (but he is very shy here lol). You see, speculation would be pointless, if there would be no evidence of Naudet and Fairbanks fakery. But, there is.
@existenceisfake Just in case you are being sarcastic, check september clues (dot) info : articles, forum, vids. Just to make sure. Or call Hezarkhani.
@existenceisfake I don't take everything in SC seriously and I'm sceptical and as I said, I have found several innacuracies in the research. But if you are not able to see evidence of the major fakery in 911 videos (atleast some), try opening your eyes. And ofcourse, if you think SC is ABSOLUTE bullshit, you are free to debunk whole research in their forums (septemberclues (dot) info), they have a challenge in there. :)
@LithuanianGuitar I do believe it's absolute BS. I've yet to see one substantial claim of fakery presented by Simon Shack. The guy has the analytical sophistication of a six-year-old. SC is laughable. As far as opening my eyes--I would recommend for you to open your mind--it might provide answers to why your eyes are fooling you.
@existenceisfake SC is only the start. There are many follow-ups, that even go further and find more evidence of media fakery. I'll give you 2 examples (naduet footage): watch?v=dBzSJz8XWfU and watch?v=l0A4BdlPmAA&feature=related
@LithuanianGuitar The shifting buildings--it's a DVD compression artifact--a kind that is well known. Video compression artifacts and subtle differences between footage that has trans-coded, e.g., from PAL to NTSC, and processed and re-precessed does not prove fakery. These are silly arguments.
@existenceisfake Since when compression artifacts look like that lol? Can you provide me any video with that kind of stuff?(travelling buildings). Also, what about the audio fakery in naudet and in the other videos? Don't even get me started on the naudet 2nd hit lol. Obviously used drum cymbal samples and the ridicoulous video cuts (yet the audio isn't cut). I posted a comment about it on that video (911veritas) and it was deleted, I got blocked from commenting. Fishy stuff.
@existenceisfake What is this video trying to prove? Radar error? So? Maybe I didn't understand the video due to my language problems, but really, what is the point of it?
actually the target is pretty obvious by now. only a fool woud take the camera off the only target in new york city but gee i didnt exactly film the murrah federal building getting blown up did i.
i dont get it how is that a lucky shot the videos on that day could have been 10x better like from a roof next to the building and them not looking behing them when they heard the noise its like jumping off a cliff in to water on the way down someone screams are you going to look back..the adrenalin pumping effects your hearing and im sure people watching that day adrenalin was pumping still does for me even watching videos.
Too much LAG from impact to sound of impact. He was farther away then what is claimed. There is no way a normal person would not check out what is coming at you after the 1st attack.
Even the sound of the pitch of the engines does not sound correct. It was farther away.
Well just like you I can say that I have any degrees relevant to the conversation. Until I see a timestamped photo of you holding said degrees I choose to believe that you're simply like the majority of people posting in these insane threads and that you have no relevant skills or education and are simply posting opinion.
No, I'm saying that you almost certainly don't have the technical knowledge required to back up your opinion. I'm saying you're part of a fringe group that has little more than wild theories to substantiate absurd statements such as "There weren't any planes!" These statements show a fundamental lack of technical understanding that shows how fucking ridiculous people like you are. NOW we're done.
@Gunny467 , you are wrong. Check out YouTubers videos like FakePlanes, Spacecowboy1954, Tankerenemy, and you will see many examples of jet holographs where 1 or more engine seems to disappear. Or a wing. There is some sort of technology being used that projects an image of a jet. Many chemtrail researchers have accidentally discovered this while filming what they thought were jets spraying trails were really not jets at all. There are many similar comparisons to what we saw on 9-11's 2nd hit.
@Gunny467 , also what Magnus was trying to say is that a plane cannot fly at 560 mph at such a low altitude. When the "plane" hit, it was only at an alitude of a 1000 feet, or the length of a football field. The density of air at such a low altitude makes it impossible to fly a jet at that speed. Same goes for the Pentagon.
@GrassyKnollTrolls And this is a patently untrue statement. Planes can, and do, break the sound barrier at sea level. They do it all the time. We have people in the corp that do tower buzzes at easily 600kph. I'm sorry, but science disagrees with you again.
So what your saying is that planes flying within a mile of each other crash? So places like LAX and other large airports are a hoax because hundreds of planes are "said" to be operating within much less than a mile of each other? You, sir, are clearly a liar when you state you're a pilot.
That has nothing to do with your inane statement that the aircraft vortex would remain stable when exposed to a massive concussion wave caused by the displacement of a large volume of air visa vi an explosion caused by a catastrophic collision with a building. The heat and concussion wave alone would have obliterated it.
On another note, I'm almost certain that "Truthers" are the real trolls here. I'm just calling you idiots out on your lunacy.
The explosion sound took 4 seconds to travel from ground zero to the camera's mic.
There is no air vortex in the smoke surrounding the impact cavity. An air vortex is an invisible wake of air being moved where mass used to occupy, so the plan could not have been real.
Aluminum cannot poke a hole through concrete & steel beams
Explosion particles cannot fall in front of the foreground tree (watch it carefully)
LOL you are on drugs dude you could not spell that correctly.
Yes Explosive Bolts have been around since the Apollo Space Program and although I watched us land on the Moon you were not even shitting in your pants.
Explosive bolts cause the Engine to snape off on impact which the FAA found saved more lives during a crash.
Even now that I know for sure that is a fake, still feels hard to watch. Too many years believing that the videos were real. My mind knows the videos are fake, but my heart still doesn't.
the shot with the octopuss in the background was that done b4 911 I also seen it in a goverment show on smallpox does anyone know the story behind that shot and where i could find it
Yes indeed. The birds are flying strangely. I'm also surprised to only hear "Oh my God!". People around are not cursing or even saying "Oh my God" in another languages like French or something. Maybe someone is speaking in Japanese but I'm not sure. Is it not supposed to be a boat for tourists? This shot is not realistic at all. How can he remain so cool. and why does he say what everyone saw?
Yeah, of course but this guy just remains so cool. He does not even try to find the source of the roaring just like the video is underlining. Why does he say what we saw? I agree with you but that vid is a fake. Killtown exposed the soundtrack. On some hezarkhani does not even speak! watch the vid! Unbelievable!
i hear ya, my man ... dont forget the operations ala ajax and northwoods, and toss in some mena arky and the USS LIERTY and MAINE... what they teach in school is bullshit, another racket to brainwash ... when Hez keeps hanging up on Jeff on the companion vid about tells the whole story ... this is one of biggest blazing guns of 9/11, the avg. sheep is beyond clueless ... great post!!
i know wat happend before we pick up the sound on this camera he hears it coming he turns around with his head then turn back zooms out trys to turn but to late he pans up to catch the crash all of this is caught at a great time oand a person behind him says look a plane ow my god at that time i think he turned around his head at that note i rest my case
he owns a diamond shop in LA and he got a bounch of money after giving the video to the fed and cnn, hope he gets cancer and all of his childrens. he is a filty liar who deseerv to be in JAIL after the collapse of NEO-NAZI regime in usa
visit septemberclues.info
kansasinnovember 1 year ago
Whatever; still this video shows what Muslims do best. This proves just how peaceful a religion Islam really is. All of those hijakers were devout Muslims; especially the pilots.
StephenB58 1 year ago
@StephenB58 INCORRECT. When you see research, get familiar with it. Muslims didn't do anything on 911
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
This type of speculation is worthless. What a person "would have done", how they "should have reacted", why they moved the camera this way not that way--this kind of "evidence" amounts to nothing.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake No one is saying this is evidence. Is it bad to ask questions. The video is suspicious. Hezarkhani himself is not allowed to talk about the video, call him :D
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar The title says "3 more clues". A "clue" is evidence of something. Is it "bad" to ask questions? No, but worthless speculation is still worthless.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Clue - "Something that serves to guide or direct in the solution of a problem or mystery." Found that in a dictionary. It's definately not the meaning of 'evidence' lol. Much closer to 'question' than to evidence. Or in between maybe. Also, this ain't worthless speculation. This video begs to ask questions.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar Webster's for "evidence" definition 1. a : "an outward sign : indication". I believe a clue is an outward sign. Regardless, this is neither evidence nor clue. It's a biased interpretation--and it's meaningless.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Evidence is evidence. Based on arguments. If this video was presented as evidence of fakery, believe me, you would have seen a word in the video, called 'evidence'.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar The fact that you want to argue semantics is evidence that you missed my original point--which is--the biased speculating being presented here as "clues" is nothing of the sort. It's nonsense. To compare something you BELIEVE Hezarkhani did or didn't do to what a "normal person" WOULD HAVE done is futile. Why? Because there is no way to know what he was really doing or thinking, and there is no such thing as a normal person's reaction to a shocking and horrifying event..
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake No nonsense at all. You clearly don't know what clue is even when I presented it to you. THIS IS NOT MEANT TO BE EVIDENCE IN ANY MEANS. I understand your point. It's clues and to me, the video is suspicious. No people filmed around, superb aim at the alleged plane. If you put it together with some videos that have been proven fake, for eg. Fairbanks, Naudet (video and audio fakery), the word 'pointless' doesn't really fit here. Clues are clues and they beg questions.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar You're clueless. There are formal and informal uses for the term, "evidence". I provided you with one definition--an outward sign or indication. I have never asserted that this video was trying to propose some kind of formal or forensically tenable "evidence" or proof. Is it intended as evidence--of something? Absolutely. It is trying to make EVIDENT that the Hezarkhani footage is suspicious. Because it relies purely on subjective interpretation, it fails.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake This video didn't prove that the shot of M. Hezarkhani is fake. It looks like you are clueless after all. You see, the video doesn't try to make you immediately think that the shot is fake, it begs you asking questions. 'Clue' and 'evidence' are 2 different things. This video doesn't need any evidence that the shot is suspicious since it begs asking questions even if it's subjective. Go call Hezarkhani himself. He is not even allowed to talk about the video. I wonder why...
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar Nice lecture, but you're wrong. A clue is a kind of evidence.
Webster's: clue: "Something that guides through an intricate procedure or maze of difficulties; specifically : a piece of EVIDENCE that leads one toward the solution of a problem."
Oxford:: clue: "That which points the way, indicates a solution, or puts one on the track of a discovery; a key. Esp. a piece of EVIDENCE useful in the detection of a crime."
I guess they lack superior symantical acumen.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake A piece of evidence, but NOT A COMPLETE EVIDENCE or a SOLUTION. Got that? No one lacks anything, just these 911 images have a major lack of reality :). The video is not evidence of it. The clues provided here lead to the questions that can lead to the evidence. Now we only have to ask M. Hezarkhani himself (but he is very shy here lol). You see, speculation would be pointless, if there would be no evidence of Naudet and Fairbanks fakery. But, there is.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar OK so let me see if I can put all of these clues about evidence together.
A clue is "definately not the meaning of 'evidence' lol. Much closer to 'question' than to evidence. Or in between maybe."
"THIS IS NOT MEANT TO BE EVIDENCE IN ANY MEANS"
"'Clue' and 'evidence' are 2 different things. This video doesn't need any evidence that the shot is suspicious since it begs asking questions "
It is "A piece of evidence, but NOT A COMPLETE EVIDENCE or a SOLUTION. Got that?"
Got it..
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Just in case you are being sarcastic, check september clues (dot) info : articles, forum, vids. Just to make sure. Or call Hezarkhani.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar Come on--if you take september clues seriously--you truly are gullible.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake I don't take everything in SC seriously and I'm sceptical and as I said, I have found several innacuracies in the research. But if you are not able to see evidence of the major fakery in 911 videos (atleast some), try opening your eyes. And ofcourse, if you think SC is ABSOLUTE bullshit, you are free to debunk whole research in their forums (septemberclues (dot) info), they have a challenge in there. :)
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar I do believe it's absolute BS. I've yet to see one substantial claim of fakery presented by Simon Shack. The guy has the analytical sophistication of a six-year-old. SC is laughable. As far as opening my eyes--I would recommend for you to open your mind--it might provide answers to why your eyes are fooling you.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake SC is only the start. There are many follow-ups, that even go further and find more evidence of media fakery. I'll give you 2 examples (naduet footage): watch?v=dBzSJz8XWfU and watch?v=l0A4BdlPmAA&feature=related
Call me, when you debunk this :).
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar The shifting buildings--it's a DVD compression artifact--a kind that is well known. Video compression artifacts and subtle differences between footage that has trans-coded, e.g., from PAL to NTSC, and processed and re-precessed does not prove fakery. These are silly arguments.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Since when compression artifacts look like that lol? Can you provide me any video with that kind of stuff?(travelling buildings). Also, what about the audio fakery in naudet and in the other videos? Don't even get me started on the naudet 2nd hit lol. Obviously used drum cymbal samples and the ridicoulous video cuts (yet the audio isn't cut). I posted a comment about it on that video (911veritas) and it was deleted, I got blocked from commenting. Fishy stuff.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@existenceisfake The TV broadcast video had those same anomalies. It didn't change :).
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar If you're really interested in what's suspicious about flight AA11 that has nothing to do with specious "fakery" claims try this:
watch?v=3OtrdIl1ijo
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake What is this video trying to prove? Radar error? So? Maybe I didn't understand the video due to my language problems, but really, what is the point of it?
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
Comment removed
existenceisfake 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LithuanianGuitar See if this helps you underdstand:
Baseball is a game.
A game is a competetive recreational activity.
Therefore, basebal is a competetive recreational activity.
The video is a clue,
A clue is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
Therefore, the video is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
I know, it's complicated, but hang in there, you'll get eventually.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@LithuanianGuitar See if this helps you:
The video is a clue.
A clue is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
Therefore, the video is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
I know, it's complicated, but hang in there, you'll get eventually.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Little advice here: you should get it yourself before trying to handle it out to me :).
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@existenceisfake See if this helps you underdstand:
Baseball is a game.
A game is a competetive recreational activity.
Therefore, basebal is a competetive recreational activity.
The video is a clue,
A clue is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
Therefore, a clue is evidence that leads one toward a solution.
I know, it's complicated, but hang in there, you'll get eventually.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
Ironic that the accent is Israeli too.
GrassyKnollTrolls 1 year ago
actually the target is pretty obvious by now. only a fool woud take the camera off the only target in new york city but gee i didnt exactly film the murrah federal building getting blown up did i.
datzfast 1 year ago
@IMDguy
definite inside job and heres the indisputable proof, watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
911 TABOO
SEPTEMBER CLUES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
PATHETIC THEORY
ScottS183 2 years ago
i dont get it how is that a lucky shot the videos on that day could have been 10x better like from a roof next to the building and them not looking behing them when they heard the noise its like jumping off a cliff in to water on the way down someone screams are you going to look back..the adrenalin pumping effects your hearing and im sure people watching that day adrenalin was pumping still does for me even watching videos.
n8tivguitar 2 years ago
Too much LAG from impact to sound of impact. He was farther away then what is claimed. There is no way a normal person would not check out what is coming at you after the 1st attack.
Even the sound of the pitch of the engines does not sound correct. It was farther away.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
I'm sure your degrees in both video engineering and acoustics in Urban environments gives you a large amount of credibility in the real world.
Gunny467 2 years ago
Nope just my REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE as a Pilot and Common Sense. I sure you have ALL THE DEGRESS LISTED as well Gunny.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
Well just like you I can say that I have any degrees relevant to the conversation. Until I see a timestamped photo of you holding said degrees I choose to believe that you're simply like the majority of people posting in these insane threads and that you have no relevant skills or education and are simply posting opinion.
Gunny467 2 years ago
Well Moron even an Expert Testimony IN COURT is still JUST AN OPINION.
Yes, I have an Opinion. Now that I know you are Young punk Troll we are done.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
No, I'm saying that you almost certainly don't have the technical knowledge required to back up your opinion. I'm saying you're part of a fringe group that has little more than wild theories to substantiate absurd statements such as "There weren't any planes!" These statements show a fundamental lack of technical understanding that shows how fucking ridiculous people like you are. NOW we're done.
Gunny467 2 years ago
@Gunny467 , you are wrong. Check out YouTubers videos like FakePlanes, Spacecowboy1954, Tankerenemy, and you will see many examples of jet holographs where 1 or more engine seems to disappear. Or a wing. There is some sort of technology being used that projects an image of a jet. Many chemtrail researchers have accidentally discovered this while filming what they thought were jets spraying trails were really not jets at all. There are many similar comparisons to what we saw on 9-11's 2nd hit.
GrassyKnollTrolls 1 year ago
@Gunny467 , also what Magnus was trying to say is that a plane cannot fly at 560 mph at such a low altitude. When the "plane" hit, it was only at an alitude of a 1000 feet, or the length of a football field. The density of air at such a low altitude makes it impossible to fly a jet at that speed. Same goes for the Pentagon.
GrassyKnollTrolls 1 year ago
@GrassyKnollTrolls And this is a patently untrue statement. Planes can, and do, break the sound barrier at sea level. They do it all the time. We have people in the corp that do tower buzzes at easily 600kph. I'm sorry, but science disagrees with you again.
Gunny467 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Correct on both.
As a Pilot I can tell you those Aircraft Vortex are SO STRONG it will take many Aircraft right out of the sky.
I could not fly WITHIN one Mile the Vortex would down my Aircraft and kill me.
Furthermore, Aircraft DO NOT make it through Concrete and Steel Beams.
Inertia would have SNAPPED Tail Section Forward and Engines would have blown off because they have EXPLOSIVE BOLTS so they snap OFF on IMPACT.
This was done to save lives on Crash Landing.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
So what your saying is that planes flying within a mile of each other crash? So places like LAX and other large airports are a hoax because hundreds of planes are "said" to be operating within much less than a mile of each other? You, sir, are clearly a liar when you state you're a pilot.
Gunny467 2 years ago
I wish the FAA would allow me to put you 1 Football Field away and put ONE ENGINE at 50% Thrust and give you the "JackAss Roll" LOL.
Now that I know you are 24 year old punk Troll we are done.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
That has nothing to do with your inane statement that the aircraft vortex would remain stable when exposed to a massive concussion wave caused by the displacement of a large volume of air visa vi an explosion caused by a catastrophic collision with a building. The heat and concussion wave alone would have obliterated it.
On another note, I'm almost certain that "Truthers" are the real trolls here. I'm just calling you idiots out on your lunacy.
Gunny467 2 years ago
@Gunny467
watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Shit. Sorry Killtown my friend. Meant to put five stars but hit the fourth one.
911TruthVideos 2 years ago
More clues:
The explosion sound took 4 seconds to travel from ground zero to the camera's mic.
There is no air vortex in the smoke surrounding the impact cavity. An air vortex is an invisible wake of air being moved where mass used to occupy, so the plan could not have been real.
Aluminum cannot poke a hole through concrete & steel beams
Explosion particles cannot fall in front of the foreground tree (watch it carefully)
bzenns 2 years ago
Correct on both.
As a Pilot I can tell you those Aircraft Vortex are SO STRONG it will take many Aircraft right out of the sky.
I could not fly WITHIN one Mile the Vortex would down my Aircraft and kill me.
Furthermore, Aircraft DO NOT make it through Concrete and Steel Beams.
Inertia would have SNAPPED Tail Section Forward and Engines would have blown off because they have EXPLOSIVE BOLTS so they snap OFF on IMPACT.
This was done to save lives on Crash Landing.
Magnus2552112 2 years ago
@Magnus2552112 explosive bolts are you on druggs
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast
LOL you are on drugs dude you could not spell that correctly.
Yes Explosive Bolts have been around since the Apollo Space Program and although I watched us land on the Moon you were not even shitting in your pants.
Explosive bolts cause the Engine to snape off on impact which the FAA found saved more lives during a crash.
Obama retard
Magnus2552112 1 year ago
@Magnus2552112 snape off? did you misspell snap off. explosive bolts do not and never have held aircraft engines on.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast and sinse you could have google this and didnt you must be on drugs
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast
Believe what you like.
Side issue this is rare for me to get to talk to Obama Moron you are in la la land I hope I get your ass in the war.
Enjoy sucking air while you still can because your days are numbered when this country is taking back which will start very soon.
At least a bonus is that you pussies cannot fight worth a shit.
Bryan
Magnus2552112 1 year ago
Even now that I know for sure that is a fake, still feels hard to watch. Too many years believing that the videos were real. My mind knows the videos are fake, but my heart still doesn't.
JonaylaCronicas11S 2 years ago
its fake obviously
chibangin007 3 years ago
Oh, my God...
I can not believe that any sane person could possibly believe that the Hezarkhani video is genuine.
Oh, my God.
You know, nobody in their right mind would ever have believed this video was real in 1970.
It just goes to show you how massively dumbed down people have become in 25 years.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Option #3.The Hezarkhani video is a total fake.
CzarBomba92 3 years ago
the shot with the octopuss in the background was that done b4 911 I also seen it in a goverment show on smallpox does anyone know the story behind that shot and where i could find it
WakeUpZombies74 3 years ago
Yes indeed. The birds are flying strangely. I'm also surprised to only hear "Oh my God!". People around are not cursing or even saying "Oh my God" in another languages like French or something. Maybe someone is speaking in Japanese but I'm not sure. Is it not supposed to be a boat for tourists? This shot is not realistic at all. How can he remain so cool. and why does he say what everyone saw?
bastienjack 3 years ago
I dont see how you can comment on how someone reacts in different situations. Everyone reacts different, some scream, some cant scream at all.
M4cM4c4 2 years ago
Yeah, of course but this guy just remains so cool. He does not even try to find the source of the roaring just like the video is underlining. Why does he say what we saw? I agree with you but that vid is a fake. Killtown exposed the soundtrack. On some hezarkhani does not even speak! watch the vid! Unbelievable!
bastienjack 2 years ago
Watch '911 Taboo' and 'September Clues'. Wake up people.
hankwheels 3 years ago 6
i hear ya, my man ... dont forget the operations ala ajax and northwoods, and toss in some mena arky and the USS LIERTY and MAINE... what they teach in school is bullshit, another racket to brainwash ... when Hez keeps hanging up on Jeff on the companion vid about tells the whole story ... this is one of biggest blazing guns of 9/11, the avg. sheep is beyond clueless ... great post!!
pt1gard 3 years ago
Supa doopa wierd flock of birds @ 3:41 and 3:42. Bottom right!!
There is a cut/edit between 3:41 and 3:42
Quick stop and start recommended!
MandoMohan 3 years ago
good job showing us these video 5/5!!!! U rule!!!
dvlrocks 3 years ago
16.4 stars!
apocalypsynch 3 years ago
i know wat happend before we pick up the sound on this camera he hears it coming he turns around with his head then turn back zooms out trys to turn but to late he pans up to catch the crash all of this is caught at a great time oand a person behind him says look a plane ow my god at that time i think he turned around his head at that note i rest my case
wweadx2 3 years ago
#24 does the voice over
malchurn 3 years ago
micheal shitkhani is an iranian jewish zionist!
he owns a diamond shop in LA and he got a bounch of money after giving the video to the fed and cnn, hope he gets cancer and all of his childrens. he is a filty liar who deseerv to be in JAIL after the collapse of NEO-NAZI regime in usa
Mahdiarmy 3 years ago
STFU you personality cultist. Stop being such a follower for once in your tacky life.
SigurdSnakeEyes 3 years ago 3
That's the impression you're leaving, Sorro, i.e. U r not into the subject but simply suck up to everyone who is.
You even suck up to dickheads,
imho, of course.
MandoMohan 3 years ago
good vid, 5 stars from germany :)
horror11 3 years ago
another clue is the way the frame freezes for a brief period before the animation sequence.this is caused by some editing features one would presume.
squibfreud 3 years ago
the hazarkhani video is about as real as santa claus.
photofu 3 years ago
Is there a correct sound delay?
Is this plane looking like DARK-BLUE United or GREY?
Voltar78 3 years ago
Well done. Good points.
I'm intrigued mostly by the footage at 3:38 - 3:45 in the aftermath of the 2nd hit....
Is there more? Where do I find it to obtain for further study?
911conspiracyTV 3 years ago
That footage if from the doku "CNN Remembers." I showed all of the footage though.
WelcomeToKilltown 3 years ago
Thanks for the subscription. I need to start doing that....
911conspiracyTV 3 years ago
Good Find ...Excellent work once again.
NINEELEVENNEWS 3 years ago
Great stuff..
It seems that Hez doesnt even tries to sound convincing about what he allegedly was witnessing.
Totally fake!
Farshad1975 3 years ago
Totally fake.
EgilEld 3 years ago