Added: 4 years ago
From: 911NeverForget
Views: 3,001
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (46)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if you look closely you will see two big ass buildings vaporized in a few seconds

    plane or explosives?

    hmm

  • osama bin laden got shot in the face....but...ever wondered how that tiny bullet could kill a whole man??.. well....it's becasue he had thermite in his turban..

  • The building is built with layers of steel, the heat in the upper levels made that metal soft which collapsed it, ( the heat came from the burning of the jet fuel), then the weight of the previous floor added to that softness of the heated metal on the next floor down, caused the next to fall, and it kept doing that until the pure weight of the floors that had already fallen, collapsed the floors under them. It's the way the towers were built.

  • It's debris being forced outwards. The top of the building clearly tilts and 'freefalls'.

  • it doesn't "freefall".

  • this video is bullshit in the clips you can see explosions. are you blind or something idiot

  • those arent explosions.

  • @911NeverForget I quite agree. It is debris being forced outwards, not the building itself due to a 'planted' explosive device.

    How on earth could something be planted in advance, hidden from sight in a public office (remember, the amount of explosives needed would not have fitted in an envelope), and be placed in the exact floor of where the plane hit? It's an insane theory!

    The American People: Demand your full investigation, but don't cloud that demand with foolish propaganda.

  • the pancake theory?, haha... Fire caused them to fall? sure, haha. Wtc 7 hit by debris and caused it to fall at free fall speed. haha. sure. What about the explosions heard? hmmm a fax machine maybe haha.....So many people were decieved by the 9/11 fraud....its terribly sad

  • first off, it wasnt a fraud. secondly they didnt say bombs.

    explosions can mean anything. lots of things make explosions. there were those that said LIKE an explosion too, in which they were comparing something TO an explosion.

  • your one of the DISINFO K

    GO TO HELL

  • assuming you're talking to me...

    did mommy give you your bottle yet?

  • Comment removed

  • "...9/11: Total Proof that Bombs Were Planted." seen it. find it BS.

    "...Moviemaker." why? because they're right? oh, and it's WINDOWS Movie Maker, not Microsoft Moviemaker.

    "...bangs." bangs do not automatically equal bombs or explosives. it can be anything... such as people hitting the ground.

    "...bangs." the loudness of the bangs mean absolutely nothing as to whether they were bombs or not.

    "...knucklehead." sums you up nicely....that and your repetitive insults.

  • Comment removed

  • "So any proof of WITNESSES and actual EXPLOSIONS is "BS". " thanks for taking my quote out of context. further proof you're a moron.

    your insults arent helping. it just ruins your credibility even more.

  • Comment removed

  • i still saw your comment in my inbox. it doesnt remove them there.

    "...is your quote taken out of context, wizard? Do you know what context is or are you just using the word because it sounds adult?" no. i was calling that vid you recommended BS, genius. NOT witnesses and "explosions" even though i perfectly explained the explosions part (but as usual, like a moron, you ignored it).

    "...games." i suggest you take your own advice. you havent made one valid point and i doubt you ever will.

  • So are you.

  • I watched a video today in class....and there is no way the fires in those building caused them to fall. Jet fuel burns at a max of 1300 degrees and the steel in those buildings melts at 2500 degrees....and when WTC 7 fell there was fire on either side but it fell perfectly collapsing in the centre first. Just like a Demo.

  • "Jet fuel burns at a max of 1300 degrees and the steel in those buildings melts at 2500 degrees" so? the steel didnt melt. it was weakened. you dont need the steel to melt to make them fail.

    "it fell perfectly collapsing in the centre first" no it didnt. it fell to the south and west, but mainly to the south.

  • Isnt there a rumour that the news station got a tip thw towers were gonna fall 23 minutes before it actually happened?

  • no, however im sure they knew it would happen to the North Tower after the ST collapsed.

  • I just found a clip, of course I cant find it now, but on that clip they talk about both towers being down, while you can still see one of the towers in the background.. this was 23 mins before it fell, and about 5 mins before it falls, they cut the connection to the reporter....

  • thats WTC 7 you're talking about.

    the reason why they were doing that is because firemen and many others at the scene were SURE that the building would collapse. the news was told of this, and somehow they got it HAD collapsed out of it WOULD collapse.

    this was common for rumors and wrong info to be brewing on 9/11. there was so much confusion that day...

  • ooooh ok... Got it.. :D But then I still think its wierd that WTC 7 collapsed..

  • WTC 7 was hit by debris from the collapse of the North Tower. the result was fires that started and a 30 floor gash on the building. it was left unattended for many hours until about 1-2pm. by then, the fires had grown to intense levels. by about 2:30-3pm, the buildings fate had been sealed. the fires were being fed by deisel generators that were located in the building, and were where the fires had been their strongest. about 5:30pm, pieces of the building began to fall.

  • soon East Penthouse falls, spliting the building in two followed by the rest of the building which fell south. it took 18 seconds total.

  • How come you know so much about it? :)

  • ive done LOTS of research on 9/11. thats all. ;)

  • OBSERVE *how much time* the LYING SHILLS spend "debunking" (they'd like to think) the clear and obvious fact 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB.

    You will QUICKLY REALIZE that THE 9/11 COVERUP IS IN PROGRESS when there is SO MUCH EFFORT and so much of it is OUTRIGHT LIES AND DISINFORMATION. It looks like Karl Rove stays pretty busy managing his band of right-wing flying monkeys for Bush.

    Could be part of why Rove left the White House, to devote more time to propping up the coverup.

  • If I were president in office, and I knew I had 40% of my people thinking I had the blood of 3000+ people on my hands, I would exhausted as much money as was used on the "Blow Job of the century" to make the truth known. Dodging question even from main stream media is very questionalbe and should send up the red flag period.

  • 2 building fall identcially to each other. hit in different places. So apparenlty 3 floor above the impact is enough to make a building pancake too?

  • so your telling me you didn't see the building tip over in the beginning? look at 00:13-00:16 you can see the building is tipping cause thats the side where the plane hit making it weaker where it falls over too that side like a tree but since it was higher towers the top the building toppled on itself. Same thing goes for the other one.

  • Oh no your right no doubt! but the rest of structure should be enough to deflect the upper causing it to topple away from it's base support underneath. I "think" it was a controlled demo with the help of the planes being the ignition.

  • Wow do you really, mind showing me proof of these explosives? I mean.....you probably don't have any but if you ask one of your crazy troofer friends they will probably tell you they were invisible jewish explosives

  • I researched demolishing a littel. In tight quarters they wil wrap the explosives in high density shock absorbsion material. Google it it's there.

  • and what has that have to do with anything?

  • that why you do not see flashes and the popping of the explosions.

  • thats probably because their were no explosives use, duuuuhhh

  • Don't say things like duuuuuh. I am just asking questions. I am not proving theres a god or not. I just do see at this time the way the buildings fell. @ different impact point same result. Then bulding 7. I enjoy looking into this matter. If you want to continue this 3rd grade type responses I am done talking to you about it.

  • ok Im sorry I thought you were "telling me" not "asking me". Now if we could start from scratch what it your question.

  • Ok cool ! If you have the majority inner structure of a building in the center (big colums), and only 10-30% of the weight it's supporting is damaged how would it fall striaght down in the same manner? If the 30-40% of the central columns stayed up I would believe it was structural failure. I just feel there should of have been some type of toppling.

  • If you hold on a second I'll get back to you cause I gotta do something important so your probably gonna get a answer a little later today.

  • YOU area fucktard! All buildigs buckle befor they fall!! That what gets them to collapse in the envelope of the building !! WTF!!!

  • "an example of the greatness of video???" .... are you serious or what? .. more like an example of a seriously conditioned conformist who actually believes in all those nice media lies...laughable....

  • ".... are you serious or what? .. more like an example of a seriously conditioned conformist who actually believes in all those nice media lies...laughable...."

    i find CTists to be laughable, specifically because they laugh at ANYTHING that debunks their claims.

  • OBSERVE *how much time* the LYING SHILLS spend "debunking" (they'd like to think) the clear and obvious fact 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB.

    You will QUICKLY REALIZE that THE 9/11 COVERUP IS IN PROGRESS when there is SO MUCH EFFORT and so much of it is OUTRIGHT LIES AND DISINFORMATION. It looks like Karl Rove stays pretty busy managing his band of right-wing flying monkeys for Bush.

    Could be part of why Rove left the White House, to devote more time to propping up the coverup.

  • another LiarExposer account...

  • 911CommissionCoverup is right.

    THIS IS A LYING FUCKING SHILL VIDEO FOR THE 9/11 MASS MURDERERS, ASSISTING IN THE COVERUP.

    "WashDCDemocrat" is another SHILL account by the author of this LYING SHILL video, WORKING FOR THE 9/11 MASS MURDERERS.

  • Oh stop frothing at the mouth and present some evidence of explosives or thermite or energy beams or whatever the hell your imagination tells you brought down the towers. The shrill routine isn't working.

  • good video,when ctist say it fell at free fall speed im sure they say it like it collapsed from the top but it didnt

  • Who are you going to believe?

    A) A few LYING right-wing losers like the author of this video who go to AN AWFUL LOT OF WORK trying to maintain the 9/11 coverup to protect the real mass murderers?

    B) HUNDREDS of professional architects, engineers, physicists and other scientists, pilots, and educated people of all types, NOW including 7 CIA veterans! See my profile for details...

    LET THE TRUTH BE KNOWN!

  • for the 3rd time, stop posting crap on every one of my videos.

  • WashDC, that is exactly what I have been thinking for the past 6 years! it's obvious that the stuff being spewed out of the lower floors is just debris from higher levels above as the building collpased. It's distgusting that people even believe in a conspiracy theory. It makes me sick to my stomach.

  • I think that the "squibs" are debris from lower floors being thrown from the building.

    GOOD JOB MAN!

  • good post, thanks for sharing.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more