Quit being fucking stupid and saying the puck stopped advancing toward the net...look at it in slow-mo, it clearly keeps moving, slowly, but still moving. Don't be jealous because he's one of the best captains to ever lace them up and he's a fucking monster on the ice.
My opinion, just make it one shot anything goes. I mean the shoot out is nothing more than an act anyway, so why not just go all out and turn it into the Show the NHL wants it to be. Plus it would take away controversy like this.
love marty st louis but i honestly dont think this should be allowed in a shootout. he stopped in front of the net and the puck stopped too, after the spin he stopped the puck to help get elevation off the backhand
@TommyLeTerror You're a fucking idiot. He never stopped. he went really slow, but never stopped. Check what you're looking at before you automatically assume it's right you idiot
@MattyG2for3 way to get really upset about a youtube comment. and looking at the slow mo he pretty clearly stops the puck in front of the net. i saw what you were saying about him moving slowly, but from what i see the puck stopped.
Nothing like Omark - St. Louis was deking out Corey Crawford, fooling Crawford into thinking that he would go stick side, and he went glove side instead.
The little guy with the big heart, He deserves the Conn Smythe, He is one amazing hockey player, My Dad was friends with Bobby Hull, Gordie Howe and Bobby Orr and he has always told me how great this kid was going to be and he was right even off the ice he is a great humanitarian =]
YOU GUYS ARE IDIOTS, MARTY STLOUIS IS THE BEST HEARTED HOCKEY PLAYER, HE IS A GREAT FATHER TO HIS BOYS AND HE LIVES HOCKEY AND PREPARING FOR HOCKEY, ON THE ICE HE IS VOCAL AND ALWAYS MOTIVATING HIS TEAMMATES TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE LIKE HE DOES SO OFTEN
@ChopperCity47 I agree these people criticizing him for stupid crap ! who cares hes a good hockey player and whether you like the blackhawks or not you should respect that
I guess when Martin St. Louis scores a flashy goal in the shootout, it's okay. But when Linus Omark or anyone else does it, according to him, it's showboating and uncalled for.
bullshit move, then should and will ban spin o ramas, like dean L. said what if like the philly-NYR shootout last year, the playoffs were determined by this cheap move, not gonna happen
@82hky82 i respect it i've done the skate backwards and scored before if you have done it you will know your still have motion towards the net any motion forward counts.
Filthy move, and St. Louis is a great player, but I saw this live and instantly I was like "oooo, is that legal?" TECHNICALLY the puck needs to moving towards that net at all times, but with stick-handling and all that that can't happen. But it really looks like St. Louis stops and intentionally brings the puck back. I'm know it's a legal goal and it was a beauty, but I can see why Crawford would be pissed off
i am seeing this for the first time, because i had to see what the big deal was on nhl networks coverage of the general managers meetings. they are making a big deal about nothing it seems like. seems legal to me.
if you can't handle losing in a shootout with a spin move then can you really say you deserve to be a professional hockey player?...lol isn't this game all about toughness?...yet st louis and you people are worried about how omark's goal made veterans feel....that is some backwards stuff right there
yea, u omark fans are pretty dense. respect to the kid, but yes, his first game and shootout he comes out like he's the best in the world, yes it worked, but for a kid to come in and do that is a little much in the face of seasoned vets that have paid their dues is a little outrageous, kinda like subban coming in with his swagger, a lot of seasoned vets dont like it so kids like this put big bullseyes on their back. stlouis has paid his dues more then a lot of hockey players so u cant say a word
He’s a young kid. Whatever he did, it worked. “Do we need that? I don’t know. It’s kind of a slap in the face a little bit, you know? Maybe it’s a little too much, I don’t know. To get beaten in the shootout and to get beaten with something like that, it’s tough to take, but he did it and it worked.
Why doesn't anyone whining about the Lightning criticizing Omark realize that Omark spun at the blue line and St. Louis & Stamkos spun in front of the goalie and shot from the spin-o-rama, rather than using it solely for a flashy move (Omark merely wristed it through 5-hole).
lol if he really did criticize omark then that is stupid...you can do whatever the hell you want at the blue line as long as you score afterwords, that is all that matters....also, omark's spin was NOT pointless...think about it, it's a mental thing...if omark had just skated in normally and done that fake shot, it wouldn't have worked out like that, the goalie wouldn't have been fooled...it was the combination of his speed, the spin, and then the fake shot that threw the goalie off just enough
Why is there such a huge argument about whether or not this is legal? The spinorama has been done many times in the shootout. Pierre Marc Bouchard, Ryan Shannon, Jason Blake, Mikhail Grabovski and others have all done it before, and they all counted. Why shouldn't this one count?
Oh my god! Everyone call the cops, the goverment and the sponsers! That was illeagal, no spin-o-rama! He could of hurt the best player of all time! Call the cops, tell your mom! That is so dirty I am sick! AAGGHH! Why isn't he suspended! Give him five years!! AAGGHH! Call the cops someone please!
watch the last slow mo replay, it looks like he stops the puck with forehand after the spin, but then when he lifts his stick to go to his backhand you can see the puck clearly keeps sliding an inch or two before he touches it again...by the laws of physics (Newton's) it is impossible for the puck to have stopped...objects at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force...there was no outside force yet the puck moved an inch or two so it is LITERALLY impossible for it to have stopped
watch the last slow mo replay, it looks like he stops the puck with forehand after the spin, but then when he lifts his stick to go to his backhand you can see the puck clearly keeps sliding an inch or two before he touches it again....by the laws of physics (Newton's) it is impossible for the puck to have stopped...objects at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force...there was no outside force yet the puck moved an inch or two so it is LITERALLY impossible for it to have stopped
I wish these spin-a-rama type goals didn't count, they pretty cheap and easy to do but nearly impossible to stop for a goalie. I actually wish they got rid of shootouts completely.
Grow up, move to Canada and learn the rules people. It's a clean goal... he moved the puck back and forth before the shot... it never came to a COMPLETE stop. You're just mad because he won the game and you didn't ;)
This is a good shootout goal Right until the moment he moves the puck BACKWARDS just a couple inches. the puck WAS in constant motion, but that motion cannot be like that
Shit like this is dumb, they might as well allow all five players on at once going 5-0 on a goalie and then allowing goalie interference plays and if they net gets knocked off before they score then thats okay too.
look at 0:30 he stopped the puck and moved it backward for a second, aka Illegal, another thing Tampa bay is the most hypocritical team ever, criticize linus omark shootout, then both stamkos and st louis does something with spinning, and linus omark did his thing way better, and i am no oilers fan.
@buddhistgangstamonk Haha it's pathetic how ppl like you can compare Linus goal with the ones Stamkos and St Louis did, sayiong he did it better. He does it at the blueline.. and it's just becaues he's an entertainer who gain confidence by doing it. And btw I'm from Sweden and have always loved Omarks moves I just think it's pathetic how you can compare the goals..
So this retard criticises Omark for starting a shootout attempt with a spinorama, and then does this himself right in front of the goal? I give him credit for his on-ice skill, but he gets no respect from me as a person or as a sportsman
@vince117 How hard is it for you idiots to understand that he criticized him because he was a rookie who was showing off and not because of the move itself? holy fuck you Omark fanboys are dense.
@DzekoSucks I couldn't care less for Omark. Just saying that St Louis comes off as a douche for criticising people (no matter rookie or not) for flashy moves and then doing it himself
@vince117 He didn't criticize him for using flashy moves, he criticized him for using flashy moves as a rookie. St. Louis has earned the right to make flashy moves. So has Stamkos. Omark has not. Would you like me to explain it to you once more or has whatever common sense you have kicked in yet?
@vince117 st louis is a great sportsman he has won the lady byng trophy in the past. linus omark did the spinorama at center ice to show off. st louis did the spinorama to fake the goalie
@vince117 okay i didn't think he should have critized Omark either but serouis Omarks was 40 away from the net and pretty much just for show St.Louis is part of the move
@vince117 Marty perfected the spinarama, check his shot against fluery if you don't believe that! Oh and let the better team win! Check the standings if you don't believe me.
hahaha, look at you retards wasting time arguing over a SHOOTOUT goal that means nothing but 1 extra point between two teams that are locked for playoff spots already. Wow, get a life.
Hey Tards, the NHL Rulebook specifically addresses the spin move being legal in a penalty shot scenario which is what the shootout it. It's under rule 24.2 paragraph 3. Which you can read on the NHL's website.
@tpizzutelli hey tard. it also says it has to be one straight through movement you fucking idiot the puck can't go backwards and clearly it did. learn hockey before you try and repeat what espn says cause they know shit.
@chihockey030 are you serious?? the puck went back maybe 3 inches ,, thats not enough to call off a game winning goal .. lets blame the goalie for allowing such a ridiculos thing to happen to him. St. Louis is soo effing talented that he made that look easy. Im a goalie and i love that. You cant micro anylize shit like that. there has to be some common sense in this sport or else everything could be argued and controversial Chara getting crucified now for a fair hit . I say "good goal"
@tpizzutelli Hey Tard the controversy isn't in the spin move. If you paid attention the controversy is that the puck failed to maintain speed towards the net which isn't allowed.
I really enjoy watching St Louis and I think this goal is phenomenal.. as do tons of others, which is why I don't understand why this is ok, but when Linus Omark of the Edmonton Oilers did a spin-o-rama move he was called disrespectful and a showoff?
--- to clarify, I'm not saying St. Louis is either of those two things. I just find it interesting.
The spin move he makes is completely legal, but the half second pause of him and the puck, which happens to be exactly what threw off Crawford, is not. Both him and the puck stop for a good chunk of time before he flips it in the now half empty net.
No goal. The puck stops then moves away from the net. I know it needs a micrometer, but it does. Check it out. Bettman loves this though -- goofy goals, near death dirty hits. It's turned into a circus. NHL (Nascar Hockey League - it sells in the small market USA) Give NHL teams to Winnipeg, Quebec, Hamilton, Halifax. There will always be sell outs there.
I hear the NHL doesn't really care about the first 65 min of a game when it ends in a tie so they send it to a skills comp that has nothing to do with playing a team game.
AND THEN when someone in the skills competition decides to not follow the rules, the NHL continues not to care.
In this game all we saw was a group of officials officiating like the dudes that are down at your local rink on a weekend reffing a bunch of 8 year olds.
@UltimateHockeyFan91 LOL classless? he just spun at the centre of ice..what about St.Louis going backwards to score a shootout goal...i mean why does it matter what a person does leading up to the net..if doing a lil spin at centre ice is classless than how is skating backwards any different?
@Snotnarok it does look sick, but the rule is that the puck must continue moving forward at all times. when he transitions to his backhand, he stops the puck for a second. it shouldnt have been a goal.
@xXxsIckICkxXx Strange rule, I never really got to terms with all the rules I just enjoy it as a spectacle on the odd day. So forgive my ignorance but that does seem like a very silly rule.
@UltimateHockeyFan91 Nope. The shootout provides skill. You do anything to throw off the goaile. Omark threw off Tampa's Goalie (Cant remember who was in net) and scored. Classless is saying it was he shouldn't be doing that, while St.Louis pulls this off. For that St.Louis pulled an unclassy move.
I love how people have the need to bring oup the omark goal again, they were complaining ye ... but are they the first ones to?, does it make them hypocrites ? no .... And people who are saying that the ref gave the game to Tampa , go do some research and you'll see that it's exactly what they have done against Tampa, and that's not just one time ..
These were the same guys who were complaining Omark's spinerama was too much? Come on. I like Tampa, but all of those TB guys complaining are hypocrites. Stamkos had a similar shootout goal against Montreal. They came to a complete stop. Shouldn't be a goal
Omark's goal, back in December, was a perfect example of continuous, fluid motion off the spin. Unlike St. Louis, last night, Omark's movement was continuous, all the way through the shot. St. Louis stopped for a second BEFORE shooting. Therefore, NO GOAL. That's 3 imes, for sure, this season where the refs have jobbed the Hawks out of points.
That was bullshit! Most folks I know that ACTUALLY KNOW the rules are saying NO GOAL. Blackhawks had a point stolen from them by officials who obviously wanted Tampa to get the W. This wasn't the only bad call against Chicago in this game but it was the worst of them.
@winterhawks29 There were Chicago "fans" last night that cheered for a goal. Only problem was that it went in an empty net on a delayed offsides. Some hockey knowledge there.
That hit the crossbar so hard
wowmodblake 1 month ago
Puck definitely stopped
ztraina24 2 months ago
Quit being fucking stupid and saying the puck stopped advancing toward the net...look at it in slow-mo, it clearly keeps moving, slowly, but still moving. Don't be jealous because he's one of the best captains to ever lace them up and he's a fucking monster on the ice.
Iknowaghost19 3 months ago
The shootout is so stupid. It's completely irrelevant to how the game goes, and does not dictate the winner and the loser of the game.
baseball79512 4 months ago
the puck stopped moving. the goal shouldnt have counted
pantsparty1000 4 months ago
My opinion, just make it one shot anything goes. I mean the shoot out is nothing more than an act anyway, so why not just go all out and turn it into the Show the NHL wants it to be. Plus it would take away controversy like this.
Kartkid024 4 months ago
Crawford needed a map to tell where that one was going
offtherock11 6 months ago
Some of his backhand goals from 2002-2004 are absolutely unbelievable. This guys backhand is ridiculous
offtherock11 6 months ago
That was smexy!
shortdrummer991 6 months ago
his backhand is inhuman,
stainableiowa 7 months ago 2
what a beauty.
CanuckBoss123 7 months ago
I LOVE!!!!!!
le4a7 7 months ago
BEAUTIFUL GOAL
moobieNews 8 months ago
That's actually such a beauty of a goal,
You know he's got confidence if he does that during a shootout, and he can have that confidence, cause clearly he's fucking good haha
MattBeardyKH202 8 months ago
love marty st louis but i honestly dont think this should be allowed in a shootout. he stopped in front of the net and the puck stopped too, after the spin he stopped the puck to help get elevation off the backhand
TommyLeTerror 8 months ago
@TommyLeTerror You're a fucking idiot. He never stopped. he went really slow, but never stopped. Check what you're looking at before you automatically assume it's right you idiot
MattyG2for3 8 months ago
@MattyG2for3 way to get really upset about a youtube comment. and looking at the slow mo he pretty clearly stops the puck in front of the net. i saw what you were saying about him moving slowly, but from what i see the puck stopped.
TommyLeTerror 8 months ago
@TommyLeTerror ur wrong it was moving the whole time open ur eyes
zImpacT9 5 months ago
@zImpacT9 this comment was over 2 months ago. open yours
TommyLeTerror 5 months ago
God damn do i need to get laid, lol - i just loe dick
ChickWithPurpose 9 months ago
Nothing like Omark - St. Louis was deking out Corey Crawford, fooling Crawford into thinking that he would go stick side, and he went glove side instead.
AEMoreira81 9 months ago
jesus, you know he has a backhand when he moves the whole net on the fucking shot hahaha
datsyuk13a 10 months ago
The little guy with the big heart, He deserves the Conn Smythe, He is one amazing hockey player, My Dad was friends with Bobby Hull, Gordie Howe and Bobby Orr and he has always told me how great this kid was going to be and he was right even off the ice he is a great humanitarian =]
GhostsInMyAttic 10 months ago 5
The little guy with the big heart, He deserves the Conn Smythe =]
GhostsInMyAttic 10 months ago 2
I agree, St. Louis is a great player..... except I was there and I'm a blackhawks fan so it didn't feel so great.
Nitrological 10 months ago
who says the hawks will be in the playoffs?
dankphish24 11 months ago
Hey idoit blackhawk fans! ... hows it feel to be swept by the lightning this season?! enjoy your short run in the playoffs this year crybabies.
deftonesrule311 11 months ago
@deftonesrule311 you are quite buttmad
CaptainCrazzzy 11 months ago
YOU GUYS ARE IDIOTS, MARTY STLOUIS IS THE BEST HEARTED HOCKEY PLAYER, HE IS A GREAT FATHER TO HIS BOYS AND HE LIVES HOCKEY AND PREPARING FOR HOCKEY, ON THE ICE HE IS VOCAL AND ALWAYS MOTIVATING HIS TEAMMATES TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE LIKE HE DOES SO OFTEN
ChopperCity47 11 months ago 38
@ChopperCity47 I agree these people criticizing him for stupid crap ! who cares hes a good hockey player and whether you like the blackhawks or not you should respect that
dg79511876 10 months ago
@ChopperCity47 I LOVE CAPITAL LETTERS
chodewarriors1123 2 months ago
@ChopperCity47 and he is defintley lady byng like
sportsrules84 2 months ago
awesome move
YouGotMerkd 11 months ago
pro
MichaelJacksonfan628 11 months ago
I guess when Martin St. Louis scores a flashy goal in the shootout, it's okay. But when Linus Omark or anyone else does it, according to him, it's showboating and uncalled for.
dpnmnwgo1 11 months ago
bullshit move, then should and will ban spin o ramas, like dean L. said what if like the philly-NYR shootout last year, the playoffs were determined by this cheap move, not gonna happen
82hky82 11 months ago
@82hky82 he skated backwards at what point did he do a spin o rama (360 or even a 240)
XAcesxXx 11 months ago
@XAcesxXx 0:05-0:07, im calling it a spinorama, calling that he stopped foreward motion, and calling it a no goal, IMHO
82hky82 11 months ago
@82hky82 i respect it i've done the skate backwards and scored before if you have done it you will know your still have motion towards the net any motion forward counts.
XAcesxXx 11 months ago
@82hky82
The rule is the puck... not the body O.o CLEARLY seen. good shit.
Arrfist 11 months ago
.... SIICKK
ashley123monica 11 months ago
Filthy move, and St. Louis is a great player, but I saw this live and instantly I was like "oooo, is that legal?" TECHNICALLY the puck needs to moving towards that net at all times, but with stick-handling and all that that can't happen. But it really looks like St. Louis stops and intentionally brings the puck back. I'm know it's a legal goal and it was a beauty, but I can see why Crawford would be pissed off
ShadowBeatzInc 11 months ago
i am seeing this for the first time, because i had to see what the big deal was on nhl networks coverage of the general managers meetings. they are making a big deal about nothing it seems like. seems legal to me.
chalklinerefusal1 11 months ago
Beautiful goal and it was perfectly legal, nobody does it better than Marty!
TBLfan33 11 months ago
if you can't handle losing in a shootout with a spin move then can you really say you deserve to be a professional hockey player?...lol isn't this game all about toughness?...yet st louis and you people are worried about how omark's goal made veterans feel....that is some backwards stuff right there
kmorris4100 11 months ago
yea, u omark fans are pretty dense. respect to the kid, but yes, his first game and shootout he comes out like he's the best in the world, yes it worked, but for a kid to come in and do that is a little much in the face of seasoned vets that have paid their dues is a little outrageous, kinda like subban coming in with his swagger, a lot of seasoned vets dont like it so kids like this put big bullseyes on their back. stlouis has paid his dues more then a lot of hockey players so u cant say a word
slickwilly9684 11 months ago
He’s a young kid. Whatever he did, it worked. “Do we need that? I don’t know. It’s kind of a slap in the face a little bit, you know? Maybe it’s a little too much, I don’t know. To get beaten in the shootout and to get beaten with something like that, it’s tough to take, but he did it and it worked.
--quote by Martin St. Loius.
What a jackass
AusSpenRon 11 months ago
so disrespectful
bigcheefnick 11 months ago
Why doesn't anyone whining about the Lightning criticizing Omark realize that Omark spun at the blue line and St. Louis & Stamkos spun in front of the goalie and shot from the spin-o-rama, rather than using it solely for a flashy move (Omark merely wristed it through 5-hole).
Wilhemet 11 months ago
lol if he really did criticize omark then that is stupid...you can do whatever the hell you want at the blue line as long as you score afterwords, that is all that matters....also, omark's spin was NOT pointless...think about it, it's a mental thing...if omark had just skated in normally and done that fake shot, it wouldn't have worked out like that, the goalie wouldn't have been fooled...it was the combination of his speed, the spin, and then the fake shot that threw the goalie off just enough
kmorris4100 11 months ago
It is legal. But I think shootouts are getting further and further away from the original format.
johnsoncody17 11 months ago
Why is there such a huge argument about whether or not this is legal? The spinorama has been done many times in the shootout. Pierre Marc Bouchard, Ryan Shannon, Jason Blake, Mikhail Grabovski and others have all done it before, and they all counted. Why shouldn't this one count?
bigllama99 11 months ago
Totally classless
Pat12151215 11 months ago
that was just dirty.
joshreid182 11 months ago
Oh my god! Everyone call the cops, the goverment and the sponsers! That was illeagal, no spin-o-rama! He could of hurt the best player of all time! Call the cops, tell your mom! That is so dirty I am sick! AAGGHH! Why isn't he suspended! Give him five years!! AAGGHH! Call the cops someone please!
eef5510 11 months ago
watch the last slow mo replay, it looks like he stops the puck with forehand after the spin, but then when he lifts his stick to go to his backhand you can see the puck clearly keeps sliding an inch or two before he touches it again...by the laws of physics (Newton's) it is impossible for the puck to have stopped...objects at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force...there was no outside force yet the puck moved an inch or two so it is LITERALLY impossible for it to have stopped
kmorris4100 11 months ago
watch the last slow mo replay, it looks like he stops the puck with forehand after the spin, but then when he lifts his stick to go to his backhand you can see the puck clearly keeps sliding an inch or two before he touches it again....by the laws of physics (Newton's) it is impossible for the puck to have stopped...objects at rest stay at rest unless acted upon by an outside force...there was no outside force yet the puck moved an inch or two so it is LITERALLY impossible for it to have stopped
kmorris4100 11 months ago
Shit I'm quite the Hawks fan but damn.. get owned Crawford
esp2323 1 year ago
That puck stopped. Nice stuff, but it's illegal.
kellerbier2 1 year ago
filthy? more like fucking amazing!
domeROCKk 1 year ago
@domeROCKk. filthy means amazing. learn your hockey lingo
kanyeezy24 1 year ago
@kanyeezy24 i said fucking amazing!, its different than amazing
domeROCKk 1 year ago
ohh myy goddd
TheRevolutionary465 1 year ago
Omark's spin move was to intimidate the goalie - it was more of a confidence gesture rather than a move to put the puck in the net.
jimmythesnagglepuss 1 year ago
I wish these spin-a-rama type goals didn't count, they pretty cheap and easy to do but nearly impossible to stop for a goalie. I actually wish they got rid of shootouts completely.
HabsFanTom 1 year ago
Grow up, move to Canada and learn the rules people. It's a clean goal... he moved the puck back and forth before the shot... it never came to a COMPLETE stop. You're just mad because he won the game and you didn't ;)
Arrfist 1 year ago
I thought the puck was suppose to be moving forward at all times.
gaminkalv 1 year ago
@gaminkalv it is :P
Kevgodee 1 year ago
@gaminkalv He stops it for a brief second before he shoots.
gaminkalv 1 year ago
This is a good shootout goal Right until the moment he moves the puck BACKWARDS just a couple inches. the puck WAS in constant motion, but that motion cannot be like that
disfiguration 1 year ago
The arguement isnt about the spin move, its the motion of the puck....tardotelli
81MCHI 1 year ago
Shit like this is dumb, they might as well allow all five players on at once going 5-0 on a goalie and then allowing goalie interference plays and if they net gets knocked off before they score then thats okay too.
Greeb17 1 year ago
@tpizzutelli doesn't say puck can be moved backwards, watch the clip
you're the tard in this scenario
illegal as shit
daemon119 1 year ago
NHL droppin the ball all week long. terrible
yourpolice 1 year ago
nhl 11 shootout rules off?
mrhockey673 1 year ago
What is next? Allowing rebound goals on shootout/penalty shots?
Howiedoin77 1 year ago
look at 0:30 he stopped the puck and moved it backward for a second, aka Illegal, another thing Tampa bay is the most hypocritical team ever, criticize linus omark shootout, then both stamkos and st louis does something with spinning, and linus omark did his thing way better, and i am no oilers fan.
buddhistgangstamonk 1 year ago
@buddhistgangstamonk Haha it's pathetic how ppl like you can compare Linus goal with the ones Stamkos and St Louis did, sayiong he did it better. He does it at the blueline.. and it's just becaues he's an entertainer who gain confidence by doing it. And btw I'm from Sweden and have always loved Omarks moves I just think it's pathetic how you can compare the goals..
Rearrew 1 year ago
@Rearrew when i said he did it better i meant it looked a lot better when omark did it, you wanna compare these goals? bertuzzi does it better.
buddhistgangstamonk 11 months ago
greazy
jtpwnsyou 1 year ago
i was at the game it was a goal ......dnt diss the lightning u dick, ur just made cause the pussy hawks lost
blondebabyy22 1 year ago
sick shootout goal and a great player
JoeyTZM 1 year ago
Well, the puck stopped, then changed direction... so if you follow the rulebook, it's an illegal shootout goal.
WildSeven0079 1 year ago
that wasn't filthy he did him dirty just destroy him
brandensimmons1987 1 year ago
7 goalies disliked this video
PowhatanNDNZ12 1 year ago
So this retard criticises Omark for starting a shootout attempt with a spinorama, and then does this himself right in front of the goal? I give him credit for his on-ice skill, but he gets no respect from me as a person or as a sportsman
vince117 1 year ago 4
@vince117 Great Point!
44SuperShredder 1 year ago
@vince117 St Louis's spinmove actually had something to do with his goal, Omark's was at the blueline so it was pointless
00StangGT00 1 year ago
@vince117 There's a difference between doing it at the blue line and doing it right infront of the goalie...
MikeyMike377 11 months ago
@vince117 How hard is it for you idiots to understand that he criticized him because he was a rookie who was showing off and not because of the move itself? holy fuck you Omark fanboys are dense.
DzekoSucks 11 months ago
@DzekoSucks I couldn't care less for Omark. Just saying that St Louis comes off as a douche for criticising people (no matter rookie or not) for flashy moves and then doing it himself
vince117 11 months ago
@vince117 He didn't criticize him for using flashy moves, he criticized him for using flashy moves as a rookie. St. Louis has earned the right to make flashy moves. So has Stamkos. Omark has not. Would you like me to explain it to you once more or has whatever common sense you have kicked in yet?
DzekoSucks 11 months ago
@vince117
If you dont respect St Louis for being the first leprechaun in the NHL, then throw in moves like this, it must take a lot to win you over.
85Drewbear 11 months ago
@vince117 st louis is a great sportsman he has won the lady byng trophy in the past. linus omark did the spinorama at center ice to show off. st louis did the spinorama to fake the goalie
stopdropandroll 11 months ago
@vince117 ya but st louis' goal was caused by the spin ... omark's was useless, just to show off
DarkZimmer 11 months ago
@DarkZimmer
Thank you finally someone who understands the difference.
Austin9599945 11 months ago
@vince117 okay i didn't think he should have critized Omark either but serouis Omarks was 40 away from the net and pretty much just for show St.Louis is part of the move
FTJFuelTheJet 11 months ago 11
@vince117 Marty perfected the spinarama, check his shot against fluery if you don't believe that! Oh and let the better team win! Check the standings if you don't believe me.
Arrfist 11 months ago
I only dislike because I'm a blackhawk fan, we'll get them next time
wtfyouahaa 1 year ago
Comment removed
CRASdanglin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahaha, look at you retards wasting time arguing over a SHOOTOUT goal that means nothing but 1 extra point between two teams that are locked for playoff spots already. Wow, get a life.
CRASdanglin 1 year ago
Comment removed
CRASdanglin 1 year ago
The puck stopped, and then moved backwards. Which makes it clearly not a goal. But whatever, I'll take the 1 point right now.
scdunn85 1 year ago
look at that little fuck be sweet as hell
15smycity 1 year ago
Hey Tards, the NHL Rulebook specifically addresses the spin move being legal in a penalty shot scenario which is what the shootout it. It's under rule 24.2 paragraph 3. Which you can read on the NHL's website.
tpizzutelli 1 year ago 19
@tpizzutelli hey tard. it also says it has to be one straight through movement you fucking idiot the puck can't go backwards and clearly it did. learn hockey before you try and repeat what espn says cause they know shit.
chihockey030 1 year ago
@chihockey030 are you serious?? the puck went back maybe 3 inches ,, thats not enough to call off a game winning goal .. lets blame the goalie for allowing such a ridiculos thing to happen to him. St. Louis is soo effing talented that he made that look easy. Im a goalie and i love that. You cant micro anylize shit like that. there has to be some common sense in this sport or else everything could be argued and controversial Chara getting crucified now for a fair hit . I say "good goal"
S22GERONIMO220 1 year ago
@S22GERONIMO220 exactly... keyword being back... not only did he stop but it went BACK! NO GOAL by the rules... BS
jkmille1 1 year ago
@tpizzutelli but the puck did not continue towards the net. right before he shot he stick handled the puck toward center ice
PowhatanNDNZ12 1 year ago
@tpizzutelli yea but the puck has to be moving forward at all times, Mr. Genius.
Kevgodee 1 year ago
@tpizzutelli Hey Tard the controversy isn't in the spin move. If you paid attention the controversy is that the puck failed to maintain speed towards the net which isn't allowed.
SevasTra388 11 months ago
Sick but illegal shot
tdoll21 1 year ago
@tdoll21 it's not illegal haha.
SludgePunkGrunge 1 year ago
Disrespectful! Classless!
razorslice17 1 year ago
I really enjoy watching St Louis and I think this goal is phenomenal.. as do tons of others, which is why I don't understand why this is ok, but when Linus Omark of the Edmonton Oilers did a spin-o-rama move he was called disrespectful and a showoff?
--- to clarify, I'm not saying St. Louis is either of those two things. I just find it interesting.
LindsML 1 year ago
beutiful
crosbysakic8719 1 year ago
sick move but i think he stopped all foward progress
cincynj85 1 year ago
The spin move he makes is completely legal, but the half second pause of him and the puck, which happens to be exactly what threw off Crawford, is not. Both him and the puck stop for a good chunk of time before he flips it in the now half empty net.
bhoels202 1 year ago
No goal. The puck stops then moves away from the net. I know it needs a micrometer, but it does. Check it out. Bettman loves this though -- goofy goals, near death dirty hits. It's turned into a circus. NHL (Nascar Hockey League - it sells in the small market USA) Give NHL teams to Winnipeg, Quebec, Hamilton, Halifax. There will always be sell outs there.
geraldm38 1 year ago
I hear the NHL doesn't really care about the first 65 min of a game when it ends in a tie so they send it to a skills comp that has nothing to do with playing a team game.
AND THEN when someone in the skills competition decides to not follow the rules, the NHL continues not to care.
In this game all we saw was a group of officials officiating like the dudes that are down at your local rink on a weekend reffing a bunch of 8 year olds.
NotSoNormal27 1 year ago
I wanna hear Omark dissing St Louis for being cocky, that's what I want..
phille22 1 year ago
@UltimateHockeyFan91 LOL classless? he just spun at the centre of ice..what about St.Louis going backwards to score a shootout goal...i mean why does it matter what a person does leading up to the net..if doing a lil spin at centre ice is classless than how is skating backwards any different?
Blade025 1 year ago
whats the problem?
BigSTANKsalad64 1 year ago
That was quite awesome, I don't know what the problem is that others seem to have but then again I don't care. Quite the awesome shot.
Snotnarok 1 year ago
@Snotnarok it does look sick, but the rule is that the puck must continue moving forward at all times. when he transitions to his backhand, he stops the puck for a second. it shouldnt have been a goal.
xXxsIckICkxXx 1 year ago
@xXxsIckICkxXx Strange rule, I never really got to terms with all the rules I just enjoy it as a spectacle on the odd day. So forgive my ignorance but that does seem like a very silly rule.
Snotnarok 1 year ago
Grabovski'swas better...
4znwarrior10 1 year ago
@UltimateHockeyFan91 Nope. The shootout provides skill. You do anything to throw off the goaile. Omark threw off Tampa's Goalie (Cant remember who was in net) and scored. Classless is saying it was he shouldn't be doing that, while St.Louis pulls this off. For that St.Louis pulled an unclassy move.
hockeyfan9127 1 year ago
@hockeyfan9127 The goalie was Dan Ellis I believe.
Killdo2112 1 year ago
Disrespectful... ;-)
JCMoney 1 year ago
Sick goal!
chinggoy15 1 year ago
... and Hossa responds with that measly shot.
idlgames 1 year ago
LIGHTNING AHHHHHH love marty. Killer Goal... now lets keep winning guys. SC 2011
mercuryverado100 1 year ago
Corey Crawford hit the dislike button
origamiburitto 1 year ago
Puck never went back,we all know that the league has been lenient even encouraging to show moves like this in the shootout.Tampa dont get no respect.
Theyre beast
Austin9599945 1 year ago
I love how people have the need to bring oup the omark goal again, they were complaining ye ... but are they the first ones to?, does it make them hypocrites ? no .... And people who are saying that the ref gave the game to Tampa , go do some research and you'll see that it's exactly what they have done against Tampa, and that's not just one time ..
Rearrew 1 year ago
Disgusting.
steveg261991 1 year ago
THAT DISRESPECTED THE LEAGUE OMG!!!1!1!!!!!1 :O
dShroppy 1 year ago
These were the same guys who were complaining Omark's spinerama was too much? Come on. I like Tampa, but all of those TB guys complaining are hypocrites. Stamkos had a similar shootout goal against Montreal. They came to a complete stop. Shouldn't be a goal
DecapitatedDoctor 1 year ago
Love this guy
FoxGoalie 1 year ago
Classless, just classless.
PVAimo 1 year ago
@PVAimo
just cause you never will have half the skill this guy has doesn't mean you got hate on him
SPASHOCKEY 1 year ago
@SPASHOCKEY You clearly have no clue what I meant. Check out Marty's comments on Omark's spin-move and don't just post comments.
PVAimo 1 year ago
illegal like a mexican crossing the boarder
9ava9 1 year ago 5
@9ava9
ur amount of gayness shud be illegal
gtfo here cunt
SHAKEITSHAKETHATBEAR 1 year ago
@SHAKEITSHAKETHATBEAR someones a mexican ...
9ava9 1 year ago
Great play, not sure if it's legal because forward progress was halted. But hey, they reviewed it, said it was good, so more power to him.
BigSilky85 1 year ago
nasty
hockeytownak 1 year ago
Omark's goal, back in December, was a perfect example of continuous, fluid motion off the spin. Unlike St. Louis, last night, Omark's movement was continuous, all the way through the shot. St. Louis stopped for a second BEFORE shooting. Therefore, NO GOAL. That's 3 imes, for sure, this season where the refs have jobbed the Hawks out of points.
IlliniDave68 1 year ago
It was sick, just hopefully he apologizes to omark for saying his was dirty ;)
hockeyfan9127 1 year ago
@hockeyfan9127 - Some people's (St. Louis) hypocrisy knows no bounds.
IlliniDave68 1 year ago
that was dirtier than my search history.
HughJassBard 1 year ago
What a sick goal!!! Marty is awesome!
GalilGade 1 year ago
@GalilGade - yeah, the goal was so sick, it was positively illegal.
IlliniDave68 1 year ago
That was bullshit! Most folks I know that ACTUALLY KNOW the rules are saying NO GOAL. Blackhawks had a point stolen from them by officials who obviously wanted Tampa to get the W. This wasn't the only bad call against Chicago in this game but it was the worst of them.
IlliniDave68 1 year ago
clearly illegal
karasoo02 1 year ago
illegeal
karasoo02 1 year ago
He completely stops the puck and theres like a 1 second wait before backhanding it.. = no goal to me..
espn1337 1 year ago
Still not as good as the bicycle kick. That will be the stop play on sportscenter for a long time.
tyl3r6024 1 year ago
that was sick i am going to try that
tbart76 1 year ago
how can they even think that was not a good goal xD, he is clearly not delaying anything
ihatestartrek92 1 year ago
Wow, that move was so sick it should be illegal, oh no wait.
Kartkid024 1 year ago
Bar Down. Looking like Ronald McDangle. Go Bolts!
flamesc76 1 year ago
Great shootout goal.
LunttiC 1 year ago
Very interesting: What does it says in the NHL rulebook about penaltyshoot: "The puck must be kept in motion towards the opponent’s goal line".
St. Louis stopped the puck when he was turning around. So referee should NOT allow the goal.
Flatkuttaja 1 year ago
st louis has skills......was a great shot....must be a bunch of chicago bandwagoners whining......
winterhawks29 1 year ago 11
@winterhawks29 - I'm 43, have been a Blackhawks fan all my life, and couldn't disagree with you more about the goal.
IlliniDave68 1 year ago
@winterhawks29 There were Chicago "fans" last night that cheered for a goal. Only problem was that it went in an empty net on a delayed offsides. Some hockey knowledge there.
TimCouch299 1 year ago
Linus must be shaking his head.
badbunny 1 year ago
NO GOAL
Sk3pTiCz 1 year ago
What the fuck??!!? Martin St. Louis you're a disgrace for NHL! This is so overboard!! You don't need to do that spin omfg!!! HERP DERP!!!
So funny how Tampa were bitching over Omark a couple months ago and since then I've seen players in Tampa do these spins a few times.
Ecke1692 1 year ago 2
Marty St. Hypocrite and the Tampa Bay Whining
Kerec 1 year ago 2