Duh! Hell yea the actions of whites have been devilsh ok? If rev. Wright did talk about it and called whites oppressors and devils like duh aren't yal? Unbelievable U go to all countries and reek havoc yet u ain't a devil? Yesterday was MLK B'day reflected much on how whites waterhosed blacks,billy clubbed blacks, lynched blacks hello and u call yourself a saint & we ain't suppose to talk about it daaaamn! Dr. Hill makes me proud of my race, he puts it down! Go Bro! Represent!
OMG Bill O'Reilly is a dumbass Idiot! TeaParty people have intimidated the President by carrying displayed guns around him! That is very much wrong yet just the other day a woman from Tenn. got arrest for carrying a gun to groundzero /911 site but yet it's ok to carry a gun openly near our President of the US of kkk? come on now what's wrong with this picture? Guess the president's life ain't important wow! Under No circumstances should people be allowed to carry guns around any President!!!
Marc Lamont Hill rocks. and he's right.....i don't think ppl quiet understand what institutionalized quiet means. Look at drug laws. The two most prominent drugs to bust people for are crack and crystal meth. So right there you have institution (govt.) that targets poorer blacks and poorer whites. Where is crack predominantly found, in impoverished black communities...where is crystal meth predominantly found, in impoverished white communities. Why not target more expensive drugs like cocaine?
First of all racism is a social construction. There is no such thing as racism, only prejudice. Also, O'Reilly is not a real journalist. He is not a real reporter. If you want the real story, you are supposed to ask unbiased questions and allow the person to respond. You can not ask a question and goad the interviewee into a particular response you are looking for. If you want to expose someone, allow them to do it on their own accord. He didn't even allow the man to give an answer.
No change of mind then people? lol Sloganeering again - leftist liberal - racists etc. Will someone actually address the fact that everyone in the USA is in competition to be "right". And therefore the opposition is always "wrong". Bill O'Reilly doesn't listen. Glenn Beck talks nonsense and goodness knows what his version of well known history is meant to impart. All I hear is Racist - liberal/conservative/progressive or what every TEA PARTY is meant to mean.
Typical leftist liberal fucktard. Messing with the definition of words.
Heres a news flash mr fucking ph.d.
Racism = Bigotry.
Bigotry =/= Racism.
And always with the "oh, I haven't seen/heard that video/soundbyte" when it could have 6 million views on youtube. But something that has zero proof for (like the spitting on the senator and calling him nigger) hes all like "I seen it/ heard it!" Like a white trash hillbilly claiming he saw a flying saucer.
Actually, Bill does listen. But every time he asked a question, the racist refused to answer it or skidded around the question.
Sorry you think asking tough questions, and demanding an answer to that specific question and not going off on a tangent or refusing to answer it, then giving up cause the interviewee is a racist cock who knows hes been nailed, and pussyfoots around is "pigeon holing".
why did Lamont back away from the point that whites, as a whole have been and continue to be oppressors of blacks - an elementary review of history proves that. the legacy of institutional white racism persists today and that is what Wright/Farrakhan address, as well as the lack of initiative of blacks to better themselves. there is no history of blacks enslaving or lynching whites in the name of Jesus or oppressing them as a collective b/c they're whiteness makes them inferior. none.
You're full of it. Granted, this nation has a long history of racism, but the notion that whites continue to institutionalize their racism against blacks is manifestly presposterous. I find it idiotic that someone can make that argument in a country where a black man is the president.
@KinglyNumbaOne the fact that Obama felt compelled to avoid his blackness while Hillary Clinton touted her feminist agenda proves my point. What if Obama had refused to outright renounce his pastor but praised the good and expressed disappointment in the bad. Obama was stripped of any aspect of the black experience that did not please whites, albeit willingly. The way he ran and governs proves that instit'l white racism exists. No prominent white will be forced to renounce the tea party.
@KinglyNumbaOne Obama has something in his policy bag for Jews (proxy wars), hispanics (amnesty), feminists(supreme court), conservative whites (compromise on healthcare), and gays (repeale of DADT); while blacks are debating whether he should have a black agenda. Let's see if he does anything to repeal the discrepancy in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine.
Marc Lamont Hill is an idiot, but O'Reilly is even stupider than he is. (By the way, I am a conservative.)
Why would any sane person accept the premise that Tea Partiers have racists in their ranks when every case of racism in the Tea Parties, where we know who is perpetrating it, has been committed by some form of liberal posing as a Tea Party member?
Hill's points, like most liberal arguments, are laughably weak, at best, and ponderously idiotic, at worst.
i agree with Bill O'Reilly. Marc Lamont Hill is so far out there he doesn't see it from both sides, only his side.
CooperMcKay 3 days ago
Duh! Hell yea the actions of whites have been devilsh ok? If rev. Wright did talk about it and called whites oppressors and devils like duh aren't yal? Unbelievable U go to all countries and reek havoc yet u ain't a devil? Yesterday was MLK B'day reflected much on how whites waterhosed blacks,billy clubbed blacks, lynched blacks hello and u call yourself a saint & we ain't suppose to talk about it daaaamn! Dr. Hill makes me proud of my race, he puts it down! Go Bro! Represent!
therealestsista 1 month ago
OMG Bill O'Reilly is a dumbass Idiot! TeaParty people have intimidated the President by carrying displayed guns around him! That is very much wrong yet just the other day a woman from Tenn. got arrest for carrying a gun to groundzero /911 site but yet it's ok to carry a gun openly near our President of the US of kkk? come on now what's wrong with this picture? Guess the president's life ain't important wow! Under No circumstances should people be allowed to carry guns around any President!!!
therealestsista 2 months ago
So typical of white people to have the blind shutters on and b n denial pitiful
therealestsista 9 months ago
keep describing the blacks but using the white name
shooterman13 2 months ago
O Reilly is a idiot.
TheJafrikan 11 months ago
MLH is actually one a of a very few Leftys I will even tolerate he really makes sense sometimes.
deeperwaterz 1 year ago
Marc Lamont Hill rocks. and he's right.....i don't think ppl quiet understand what institutionalized quiet means. Look at drug laws. The two most prominent drugs to bust people for are crack and crystal meth. So right there you have institution (govt.) that targets poorer blacks and poorer whites. Where is crack predominantly found, in impoverished black communities...where is crystal meth predominantly found, in impoverished white communities. Why not target more expensive drugs like cocaine?
MartinXNewton 1 year ago
And if you think racism isn't institutionalized, then you are sadly misinformed and willfully ignorant of the social issues in minority communities.
KILLERkila 1 year ago
First of all racism is a social construction. There is no such thing as racism, only prejudice. Also, O'Reilly is not a real journalist. He is not a real reporter. If you want the real story, you are supposed to ask unbiased questions and allow the person to respond. You can not ask a question and goad the interviewee into a particular response you are looking for. If you want to expose someone, allow them to do it on their own accord. He didn't even allow the man to give an answer.
KILLERkila 1 year ago
Nit-pickin Hill as usual evades questions and is a racist himself !!! In a fancy suit!!!
HorneyToad1 1 year ago
I read both views and cogitated.
No change of mind then people? lol Sloganeering again - leftist liberal - racists etc. Will someone actually address the fact that everyone in the USA is in competition to be "right". And therefore the opposition is always "wrong". Bill O'Reilly doesn't listen. Glenn Beck talks nonsense and goodness knows what his version of well known history is meant to impart. All I hear is Racist - liberal/conservative/progressive or what every TEA PARTY is meant to mean.
RaleighDawlishRaynar 1 year ago
Typical leftist liberal fucktard. Messing with the definition of words.
Heres a news flash mr fucking ph.d.
Racism = Bigotry.
Bigotry =/= Racism.
And always with the "oh, I haven't seen/heard that video/soundbyte" when it could have 6 million views on youtube. But something that has zero proof for (like the spitting on the senator and calling him nigger) hes all like "I seen it/ heard it!" Like a white trash hillbilly claiming he saw a flying saucer.
girzwald3 1 year ago
Very interesting interview Mr Bill O'Reilly is but he does not LISTEN. He has views and his poor interviewees get pigeon holed in them.
I said an interesting interviewer. Not a particularly good one - in my stone slacker, liberal pinheaded view - of course.
Subject: I - hole hour - vapidness hidden
Anagram: Pinhead - dishonour - I shelved
RaleighDawlishRaynar 1 year ago
@RaleighDawlishRaynar
Actually, Bill does listen. But every time he asked a question, the racist refused to answer it or skidded around the question.
Sorry you think asking tough questions, and demanding an answer to that specific question and not going off on a tangent or refusing to answer it, then giving up cause the interviewee is a racist cock who knows hes been nailed, and pussyfoots around is "pigeon holing".
girzwald3 1 year ago
@4:45 O'reilly realized that the Columbia professor Hill is a Black racist
TheDavidwoody 1 year ago
@TheDavidwoody
I noticed too!
YoPimp 1 year ago
why did Lamont back away from the point that whites, as a whole have been and continue to be oppressors of blacks - an elementary review of history proves that. the legacy of institutional white racism persists today and that is what Wright/Farrakhan address, as well as the lack of initiative of blacks to better themselves. there is no history of blacks enslaving or lynching whites in the name of Jesus or oppressing them as a collective b/c they're whiteness makes them inferior. none.
hypnosquirrel 1 year ago
@hypnosquirrel
You're full of it. Granted, this nation has a long history of racism, but the notion that whites continue to institutionalize their racism against blacks is manifestly presposterous. I find it idiotic that someone can make that argument in a country where a black man is the president.
KinglyNumbaOne 1 year ago
@KinglyNumbaOne the fact that Obama felt compelled to avoid his blackness while Hillary Clinton touted her feminist agenda proves my point. What if Obama had refused to outright renounce his pastor but praised the good and expressed disappointment in the bad. Obama was stripped of any aspect of the black experience that did not please whites, albeit willingly. The way he ran and governs proves that instit'l white racism exists. No prominent white will be forced to renounce the tea party.
hypnosquirrel 1 year ago
@KinglyNumbaOne Obama has something in his policy bag for Jews (proxy wars), hispanics (amnesty), feminists(supreme court), conservative whites (compromise on healthcare), and gays (repeale of DADT); while blacks are debating whether he should have a black agenda. Let's see if he does anything to repeal the discrepancy in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine.
hypnosquirrel 1 year ago
Marc Lamont Hill is an idiot, but O'Reilly is even stupider than he is. (By the way, I am a conservative.)
Why would any sane person accept the premise that Tea Partiers have racists in their ranks when every case of racism in the Tea Parties, where we know who is perpetrating it, has been committed by some form of liberal posing as a Tea Party member?
Hill's points, like most liberal arguments, are laughably weak, at best, and ponderously idiotic, at worst.
And O'Reilly just can't debate...
KinglyNumbaOne 1 year ago
@KinglyNumbaOne I have never read a report of liberals posing as conservatives at tea party rallies.
agnosticautonomy 1 year ago
@agnosticautonomy
Perhaps you need to read more than just the New York Times...
Google "liberals infiltrate tea party" and have at it...
KinglyNumbaOne 1 year ago
@KinglyNumbaOne I goggled it and didn't find one credible article articulating your point. Just Bloggers.
agnosticautonomy 1 year ago