Yes......NASA Nazis didn't genocide 25000 slaves in their underground ICBM lair, NASA Freemasons don't hoodwink for Lucifer, the "Federal" Reserve Bank is a government agency audited every year and gives all income tax revenue to govt, Bohemian Grove is a heterosexual Christian presidential retreat, Operation Northwoods is a boy scout summer camp, Gulf of Tonkin was a real attack and we never killed millions in Nam, Cambodia, Loas, Thailand, JFKs are still alive and psychopaths dont exist.
Who really think that NASA would allow these glorified special effects nerds to disprove their claims of a moon landing by using their own NASA equipment? I think not. Really, a TV show is what you base your knowledge on? Might be time to rethink the daily misdirection being pumped into your every orifice,stand back, and ask a few questions before jumping on the band wagon and agreeing with everything you see. Departmentalisation/compartmentalisation, look them up and understand how it happened
@Bumcrumpets - Late but... :) Here's a doc that also disproves many of the same moon hoax myths that MythBusters looked at, and some that MythBusters didn't cover in that episode;
/watch?v=t4tk-3KeYNQ
They get the same results using different methods and with no involvement by NASA.
It's over 3 years since that MBs episode, so where are all the moon hoax videos doing the same experiments prove them all wrong? Just because you believe in a hoax it doesn't mean you must believe ALL the claims.
@dublime420 So is the ISS (International space station) Fake as well. How about your GPS or sat nav system, are they fake, both only about due to the moon missions.
Do you know started the CT, even after 500 million world wide watched the launch of the first rocket?
Was every independate radio telescope, tracking station, observation station and amatur telescope user also paid by Nasa to lie?
none of the experiments these guys do is credible. the footprint in the vaccum they make looks nothing like the one on the moon. plus the soviets did the lazer thing with unmanned probes, what evidence is there that the americans didnt do the same thing? plus all of the footage thats been proven to be false (wires visible, false lighting, flag blowing wildly in space) its quite clear that its fake. why such rudeness to moonhoax beleivers? why is it so bad to speak ill of the almighty usa? stupid
@MrToiletface why? why? why because the moon landings are the most documents event in human history. Sum of the worlds greatest minds, dr brain cox, prof steven hawking, sir oatrick moore, to name just 3, would laugh in the face of any CT! It isnt even a question, it's a fact, man has been to the moon!
Werhner Von Braun said that astronauts would be wise to seek the shelter of a cave to escape the barrage of micro-meteorites pelting the moon's surface.
@RussiaNukesAmerica2 Q: What were the Soviet Space Tracking Systems tracking, they had 9 seperate systems in 1969?
NIP-16 at Yevpatoriya was equipped to handle interplanetary probes. The Pluton system sent commands to the probe, while the Saturn system received data. these systems tracked the module?
It would simply be impossible to keep such a gigantic secret . Just like the top secret Roswell NM incident and noone has ever heard of the top secret area 51 .
So, the mythbusters have proven the photo's can be faked using just one lightsource, when this lightsource is to close. So what did they prove actually? NOTHING. They only said the people who said there are 2 lightsources might be wrong, but the photos can be faked.
@gijsshu so that was all you took from this program, nothing else? we all know pictures can be faked, i can put my self ina picture with bin laden oif i wanted to, but the amount of pictures, the videos, they proved they were in a vacuum, and that they were ina low grav area, both of which are impossible to build even today on earth, and the long range LRV videos show that the set must have been at nleast a mile + square, which is impossible on earth? so, they went to the moon!
@TheeBaker I must be going blind, because I didn't see the LRV in this video. The other thing I took from THIS video is: They are saying the closest thing to lunardust is ordinary sand. But what do they say later in the program about lunardust? I didn't even say they didn't go to the moon. I'm just saying the 'experiment' is crap. BTW was it a serious comment when you said you don't know it was daytime all the time? Do you know how long a lunarday last?
I guess this has been debunked, but i wud like to hear what the answer is again, thank you in advance CT's
What was the russian Lunar satellite network tracking (KIK tracking system IN USE SINCE THE 50'S) on its way from earth to the moon, was it the LM by any chance? Thanx for clearing this up!
I dont know what you mean, But I would have thought the lunar module wud have had sum exterior lights on, to light up out side at night, but im not sure! i dont know if it was day time the whole time tho?
@AgentEnigma yer i had to, these CT muppest cant just search an watch it them selves so i upped it as well! keep fighting the fight, the truth is out there!
How old are you?
unparallelshadows 1 month ago
Yes......NASA Nazis didn't genocide 25000 slaves in their underground ICBM lair, NASA Freemasons don't hoodwink for Lucifer, the "Federal" Reserve Bank is a government agency audited every year and gives all income tax revenue to govt, Bohemian Grove is a heterosexual Christian presidential retreat, Operation Northwoods is a boy scout summer camp, Gulf of Tonkin was a real attack and we never killed millions in Nam, Cambodia, Loas, Thailand, JFKs are still alive and psychopaths dont exist.
operationnorthwoodz 2 months ago
Who really think that NASA would allow these glorified special effects nerds to disprove their claims of a moon landing by using their own NASA equipment? I think not. Really, a TV show is what you base your knowledge on? Might be time to rethink the daily misdirection being pumped into your every orifice,stand back, and ask a few questions before jumping on the band wagon and agreeing with everything you see. Departmentalisation/compartmentalisation, look them up and understand how it happened
Bumcrumpets 4 months ago
@Bumcrumpets - Late but... :) Here's a doc that also disproves many of the same moon hoax myths that MythBusters looked at, and some that MythBusters didn't cover in that episode;
/watch?v=t4tk-3KeYNQ
They get the same results using different methods and with no involvement by NASA.
It's over 3 years since that MBs episode, so where are all the moon hoax videos doing the same experiments prove them all wrong? Just because you believe in a hoax it doesn't mean you must believe ALL the claims.
MTMind2 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked.
politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio (dot) html
Cosmored 7 months ago
classic mainstream disinformation tactics.
dublime420 8 months ago
@dublime420 So is the ISS (International space station) Fake as well. How about your GPS or sat nav system, are they fake, both only about due to the moon missions.
Do you know started the CT, even after 500 million world wide watched the launch of the first rocket?
Was every independate radio telescope, tracking station, observation station and amatur telescope user also paid by Nasa to lie?
TheeBaker 8 months ago
@dublime420 You're a fool to watch this and still believe in the hoax. A damned fool.
Taraalcar 5 months ago
none of the experiments these guys do is credible. the footprint in the vaccum they make looks nothing like the one on the moon. plus the soviets did the lazer thing with unmanned probes, what evidence is there that the americans didnt do the same thing? plus all of the footage thats been proven to be false (wires visible, false lighting, flag blowing wildly in space) its quite clear that its fake. why such rudeness to moonhoax beleivers? why is it so bad to speak ill of the almighty usa? stupid
MrToiletface 1 year ago
@MrToiletface why? why? why because the moon landings are the most documents event in human history. Sum of the worlds greatest minds, dr brain cox, prof steven hawking, sir oatrick moore, to name just 3, would laugh in the face of any CT! It isnt even a question, it's a fact, man has been to the moon!
TheeBaker 11 months ago
But theres ice on the moon, so there is moisture.
kjay31colombian 1 year ago
And how do they explain when a shadow is absent?
Or when the shadow of a static object changes from a photo to the next?
Or when two objects very close to each other have perpendicular shadows?
Or when objects which converge don't have shadows which converge?
hunchbacked 1 year ago
ITS NOT BECAUSE OF MOISTURE!!!! ITS BECAUSE OF GRAVITY!!!
pufixas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Werhner Von Braun said that astronauts would be wise to seek the shelter of a cave to escape the barrage of micro-meteorites pelting the moon's surface.
ScientificalnessUSA 1 year ago
Yeah, what that guy said: " These 2 simpe-minded FAGGOTS ".
RussiaNukesAmerica2 1 year ago
@RussiaNukesAmerica2 Q: What were the Soviet Space Tracking Systems tracking, they had 9 seperate systems in 1969?
NIP-16 at Yevpatoriya was equipped to handle interplanetary probes. The Pluton system sent commands to the probe, while the Saturn system received data. these systems tracked the module?
are you really that stupid?
thanks for watching!
TheeBaker 1 year ago
It would simply be impossible to keep such a gigantic secret . Just like the top secret Roswell NM incident and noone has ever heard of the top secret area 51 .
bigdubbatoo 1 year ago
@bigdubbatoo
It's not kept secret; it it was kept secret, the moon hoax would not exist.
if the scandal is smothered, it's because there are too many interests at stake.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@JuanOhJuan oh right, so that 1 thing swings it for me, i'll take this video down now you have proved everything in it to be fake!
TheeBaker 1 year ago
Why would I possibly believe anything these two simple minded fagots have to say about anything?
oOBlackHandOo 1 year ago
@oOBlackHandOo why, because all it takes to PROVE man has been to the moon is two simple minded fagots! as you wud say!
TheeBaker 1 year ago 5
@TheeBaker yeah and all it takes to disprove that man has been to the moon is you deciding it didnt happen. Fucking ignorant twit.
Nonsensei436 4 months ago
@oOBlackHandOo maybe because they are more intelligent than you or I...
brb941 1 year ago
So, the mythbusters have proven the photo's can be faked using just one lightsource, when this lightsource is to close. So what did they prove actually? NOTHING. They only said the people who said there are 2 lightsources might be wrong, but the photos can be faked.
gijsshu 1 year ago
@gijsshu so that was all you took from this program, nothing else? we all know pictures can be faked, i can put my self ina picture with bin laden oif i wanted to, but the amount of pictures, the videos, they proved they were in a vacuum, and that they were ina low grav area, both of which are impossible to build even today on earth, and the long range LRV videos show that the set must have been at nleast a mile + square, which is impossible on earth? so, they went to the moon!
TheeBaker 1 year ago
@TheeBaker I must be going blind, because I didn't see the LRV in this video. The other thing I took from THIS video is: They are saying the closest thing to lunardust is ordinary sand. But what do they say later in the program about lunardust? I didn't even say they didn't go to the moon. I'm just saying the 'experiment' is crap. BTW was it a serious comment when you said you don't know it was daytime all the time? Do you know how long a lunarday last?
gijsshu 1 year ago
I guess this has been debunked, but i wud like to hear what the answer is again, thank you in advance CT's
What was the russian Lunar satellite network tracking (KIK tracking system IN USE SINCE THE 50'S) on its way from earth to the moon, was it the LM by any chance? Thanx for clearing this up!
TheeBaker 1 year ago
nice but.. hmm what if the other light source was from the lunar module....
lautaarmy 2 years ago
I dont know what you mean, But I would have thought the lunar module wud have had sum exterior lights on, to light up out side at night, but im not sure! i dont know if it was day time the whole time tho?
TheeBaker 2 years ago
@lautaarmy well it cud be, but more than one light source means more than one shadow, which there isnt!
TheeBaker 1 year ago
Nice one dude.
AgentEnigma 2 years ago
@AgentEnigma yer i had to, these CT muppest cant just search an watch it them selves so i upped it as well! keep fighting the fight, the truth is out there!
TheeBaker 1 year ago