@BeyondNeptune The fact that your argument against him is that you don't like him shows how weak your personality is. Perhaps you're just incapable of understanding things you disagree with?
U would have to have the mind of a child to find this a compelling testable empirical argument. When I see people with gray hair soaking this up, it blows my mind.The masculine index is 19th century voodoo science.These people also have an index for evolution. According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior. Don't believe me? listen to what the Great Noble Prize winning James Watson had to say concerning this topic.
cont...Darwinism in my opinion is 19th century voodoo science. Natural selection is completely valid however the limitations of natural selection have been known for years. Maybe the Altenberg 16 summit which Newman was a part of will change the further digging of a whole some have dug themselves into. Eugenie Scott and the NCSE did and do not support the opening question of the modern synthesis and boycotted the event, even though they are fellow evolutionist.
Do you believe you can tell how masculine a person is by the shape of there head. I have seen hard looking muscle heads run at the first sign of danger and have seen baby faced young men beat and stab other men to death. If you don't believe me. asked a seasoned cop if he can tell how masculine someone is by the size of their heads. No, cops are much more smarter in this area. You cant tell by physical appearance. This is voodoo science. Ive seen flaming homosexuals open up a can of whoop ass.
I believe it is ok and completely reasonable and rational to say, we just don't know, were trying to work on it, but at this time we just don't know. Instead we give this white washed sanitized version were the positive is accentuated and the major problems are not even discussed acknowledged or hand waved away. Stuart Newman in an interview by Susan Mazur discusses this problem as well as the need to create a new extended synthesis. The modern synthesis is insufficient and holding us back...
"According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior."
-
When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker skin.
Stop using arguments like this. You know it's dishonest and all you are doing is applying moral standards on reality. Eg., rape is natural and also immoral. Does it mean it's unnatural? No, but it's still sick. One has to do with facts, the other, morals.
When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker skin.
Please cite this study, were do you guys get this stuff from?
I might not survive in hotter areas if I had darker skin??? wtf
These are not my arguments. Francis Crick proposed it and its not the first. Don't blame me, I don't believe in this bullshit.
"When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker*** skin."
***FAIRER skin, my bad.
Well, we can test adaptation. Take an individual from a species adapted to a cold environment and put it in a desert.
Now, take a species as a population and have them migrate to a hotter region from a polar one. Given time, they will adapt. If you want to see it in your lifetime, pick short-lived species.
@benthemiester "According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior".
What the hell are you talking about? Clearly you know NOTHING about evolutionary theory. There is no such thing as genetic superiority or inferiority. If you think evolution works like a ladder where things get continually better and humans are at the top, you don't get it AT ALL. You've been taught a warped misunderstanding by some moron who opposed evolution for religious reasons.
@compactdisk2 Are you denying that Darwin, Huxley and even some contemporary evolutionary scientist dont or didn't believe that Blacks are or were less evolved than the nordic white male? What do you think Darwin meant by the lower races of man. What do you think James Watson in 2007 when he said
“There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically" When speaking of Black people.
@compactdisk2 "There is no such thing as genetic superiority or inferiority. If you think evolution works like a ladder where things get continually better and humans are at the top, you don't get it AT ALL"
Hate to tell u this, but yes this was the theory. This is why the discovery of C value enigma was such a shock to evolutionist. Descent with modification from lower forms is the theory. We now know that there is no such thing as lower forms & this discovery contradicts the modern axiom.
Harry H. Laughlin Madison Grant's The Passing of the Great Race
Eugeneics Compulsory sterilization in Puerto Rico by the US government. American Association of Physical Anthropologists from 1930 to 1961 Multiregional origin of modern humans
This is a pile of bullshit on hot ice. That's why this talk focuses on philosophy and 0 on empirical testable evidence. Darwins theory has been over turned by scientific observation since the 17th century starting with Reddi, then on to Pasture,Mendel,studies of vestigials,Junk DNA.molecular phylogenies/homology,Mutation theories,anthropic principle, law of entropy, Cvalues /Cvalue paradox and cotrary to statments made on this vid He was wrong about Pangenes concerning worms and fungus.
rotten personality really? i haven't seen that. maybe you just don't agree with him.
surly74 1 year ago
this guy subtly reveals what a rotten personality he has throughout his talk. I know this type - huge asshole.
BeyondNeptune 1 year ago
@BeyondNeptune The fact that your argument against him is that you don't like him shows how weak your personality is. Perhaps you're just incapable of understanding things you disagree with?
compactdisk2 9 months ago
U would have to have the mind of a child to find this a compelling testable empirical argument. When I see people with gray hair soaking this up, it blows my mind.The masculine index is 19th century voodoo science.These people also have an index for evolution. According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior. Don't believe me? listen to what the Great Noble Prize winning James Watson had to say concerning this topic.
benthemiester 2 years ago
@benthemiester "19th century voodoo science" hahaha and you say other people have the mind of a child lol
kappkids 2 years ago
cont...Darwinism in my opinion is 19th century voodoo science. Natural selection is completely valid however the limitations of natural selection have been known for years. Maybe the Altenberg 16 summit which Newman was a part of will change the further digging of a whole some have dug themselves into. Eugenie Scott and the NCSE did and do not support the opening question of the modern synthesis and boycotted the event, even though they are fellow evolutionist.
benthemiester 2 years ago
Do you believe you can tell how masculine a person is by the shape of there head. I have seen hard looking muscle heads run at the first sign of danger and have seen baby faced young men beat and stab other men to death. If you don't believe me. asked a seasoned cop if he can tell how masculine someone is by the size of their heads. No, cops are much more smarter in this area. You cant tell by physical appearance. This is voodoo science. Ive seen flaming homosexuals open up a can of whoop ass.
benthemiester 2 years ago
@benthemiester so what do you believe then?
kappkids 2 years ago
I believe it is ok and completely reasonable and rational to say, we just don't know, were trying to work on it, but at this time we just don't know. Instead we give this white washed sanitized version were the positive is accentuated and the major problems are not even discussed acknowledged or hand waved away. Stuart Newman in an interview by Susan Mazur discusses this problem as well as the need to create a new extended synthesis. The modern synthesis is insufficient and holding us back...
benthemiester 2 years ago
@benthemiester what you just said mad no sense... it has nothing to do with this video.. what sense are you even trying to make.. bad analogy.
kappkids 2 years ago
"According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior."
-
When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker skin.
Stop using arguments like this. You know it's dishonest and all you are doing is applying moral standards on reality. Eg., rape is natural and also immoral. Does it mean it's unnatural? No, but it's still sick. One has to do with facts, the other, morals.
justforflag2 1 year ago
When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker skin.
Please cite this study, were do you guys get this stuff from?
I might not survive in hotter areas if I had darker skin??? wtf
These are not my arguments. Francis Crick proposed it and its not the first. Don't blame me, I don't believe in this bullshit.
benthemiester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"When put in a colder area with less sun, then yes, they might not manage to survive. Just as you might not survive in a hotter region, if you had darker*** skin."
***FAIRER skin, my bad.
Well, we can test adaptation. Take an individual from a species adapted to a cold environment and put it in a desert.
Now, take a species as a population and have them migrate to a hotter region from a polar one. Given time, they will adapt. If you want to see it in your lifetime, pick short-lived species.
justforflag2 1 year ago
@benthemiester
joniaiki 1 year ago
@benthemiester "According to the theory, Dark skinned people are GENETICALLY inferior".
What the hell are you talking about? Clearly you know NOTHING about evolutionary theory. There is no such thing as genetic superiority or inferiority. If you think evolution works like a ladder where things get continually better and humans are at the top, you don't get it AT ALL. You've been taught a warped misunderstanding by some moron who opposed evolution for religious reasons.
compactdisk2 9 months ago
@compactdisk2 Are you denying that Darwin, Huxley and even some contemporary evolutionary scientist dont or didn't believe that Blacks are or were less evolved than the nordic white male? What do you think Darwin meant by the lower races of man. What do you think James Watson in 2007 when he said
“There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically" When speaking of Black people.
benthemiester 9 months ago
@compactdisk2 "There is no such thing as genetic superiority or inferiority. If you think evolution works like a ladder where things get continually better and humans are at the top, you don't get it AT ALL"
Hate to tell u this, but yes this was the theory. This is why the discovery of C value enigma was such a shock to evolutionist. Descent with modification from lower forms is the theory. We now know that there is no such thing as lower forms & this discovery contradicts the modern axiom.
benthemiester 9 months ago
@compactdisk2
The Bell Curve (1994
Mankind Quarterly
Harry H. Laughlin Madison Grant's The Passing of the Great Race
Eugeneics Compulsory sterilization in Puerto Rico by the US government. American Association of Physical Anthropologists from 1930 to 1961 Multiregional origin of modern humans
benthemiester 9 months ago
This is a pile of bullshit on hot ice. That's why this talk focuses on philosophy and 0 on empirical testable evidence. Darwins theory has been over turned by scientific observation since the 17th century starting with Reddi, then on to Pasture,Mendel,studies of vestigials,Junk DNA.molecular phylogenies/homology,Mutation theories,anthropic principle, law of entropy, Cvalues /Cvalue paradox and cotrary to statments made on this vid He was wrong about Pangenes concerning worms and fungus.
benthemiester 2 years ago
Very interesting. Awesome presentation Dr. Forbs.
XstainlesX 3 years ago