I didn't know this piece needed a conductor lololz. But Ligeti was a great innovator in music, and created new sounds, some coherent (think the viola sonata and string quartets) and some (think Lontano and Lux Aeterna)...not as much lol.
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
Never do the people understand the art of their own time, NEVER!!!, except when the popes and kings were paying the artists. They even said, Mozart had too many notes
right on buddy i gave u a thumbs up, this comment explains 90% of the crap on all these youtube music videos i watch. all these comments from conservative philistines lol, they are so dim witted but arrogant at same time
I like this piece, though, this performance, and the props around the performance I didnt like at all. Not one of Ligeti's GREAT works... but a fine work none the less IMO. The performance was crap though.
There's a lot of noise and disturbances - but the performance is good - they play with verve! Ligeti didn't approve of this opus - but I think it's great!
Funny in what way? Atonal music, this is what this is, that is the term for this kind of music. I am confused at what you mean by noise and disturbances.
Don't get me wrong. I have heard that piece in various concert halls for many times and also own three or four different recordings. I can very well distinguish between the sound intended by the composer and the rather noisy surroundings. I suspect that the audience was not really up to it. I thought you meant to be funny by suggesting that atonal music is nothing but noise. Sorry about that misunderstanding.
Misunderstanding understood, I thought you were talking about the music having disturbances and noise. I also apologise for the misunderstanding. I have been responding to many people who do not comprehend Atonal music and I misread your comment thinking you were another person that needed explaining to. Sorry about that.
The soap-opera, the advertisements, the movies, radio, TV, enable and habituate the people to listen one kind and system of music; there is no understand but habit. Speak a language and can read is necessary to understand Shakespeare, but his work undestanding is not possible 'cause the people just speak.
This kind of opinion come certainly of people that believe that they understand the music of Bach or Mozart merely 'cause they can just listen the music. For them, the "right" artist are spontaneuos, don't think, just take the music from the ethereal or the nature. But music, from Bach, Mozart or Beethoven ore Ligeti is product and consequence of thought and intellectual work. The people listen music like speak: from the merely use or exposition. (to continue)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This kind of music is a great imposture. There are fools thinking to be intellectual or sophisticated why "understand" a music that is not for all, while it is only an error upon an other error.
You're the fool that doesn't understand this. Ligeti's works are based on very articulated mathematical models. I love his music and I'm not alone. Kubrick asked him to use his "Lux aeterna" in his movie "2001 a space odyssey". If you are little for this music, go listen pop and don't act like a moron.
The little fleshy folk look cold and listless...
radiootoo 1 year ago
very nice
fabiopalma 1 year ago
I've got very deep depression...this is very good aid for it!
Ligeti was great artist!
Kapomafioso 1 year ago
Ma dov'è la musica???????
amioparere1 2 years ago
@amioparere1 La musica sta qui.
jdbrown371 11 months ago
@amioparere1 E' lì... attento!...attento!... azz'.. andata!
gilgamesh1971 8 months ago
I think it is unfair to "expose" this music along with the other works, because everything else looks then so "decorative" and it truly isn't.
Komalantz 2 years ago 2
What a nice composition!
sucking345 2 years ago 2
I don't know this music...
CutePrincessxo 3 years ago
Beautiful.
MLAOTNMCC 3 years ago 7
Well, I understand the music, but I do not enjoy it, I agree with laurion69 that it is a great imposture
SwePianoholic 3 years ago
I understand this music too, but.. trying to feel this kind of music is a step further on (that's the goal, I think).
Sorry for my english.
regnar666 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is this music?
SwePianoholic 3 years ago
this is music
Knoxoleum 3 years ago 7
It's a Quarter-tone piece, isn't it?
rceretta 3 years ago
It's divided into two ensembles, the first is tuned a quarter-tone (higher I think).
Awesome piece.
stevtomato 3 years ago 2
why reply is bugged ? .. bha
gnubboleso 3 years ago
Quite eerie. Lovely when they all come together. I got goosebumps.
CarmenxSandiego 3 years ago
I didn't know this piece needed a conductor lololz. But Ligeti was a great innovator in music, and created new sounds, some coherent (think the viola sonata and string quartets) and some (think Lontano and Lux Aeterna)...not as much lol.
tempodimarcia 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Here is nothing to understand. This music is only a big mistake.
laurion69 3 years ago
and u are bufoon
gnubboleso 3 years ago
You Know nothing.
rceretta 3 years ago
Great! too bad there was so much noise in the background, and my headphones suck :(
Werwolf2x 3 years ago
4:20 game me a chill all down my back
Pinchoro 3 years ago
Gorgeous!
I wish I could play something like that and keep it together!
Quoyled 4 years ago
no, the actual piece sounds like it. It s lovely
aberotter 4 years ago
well i think the piece is fine..but this cunductor..looks like this is his first performance
matzeeeeeee 4 years ago
This piece is awesome.
And i think this music is not to be understood. Maybe it is just to sit down and feeling the waves.
Andore665 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
A music ugly and without a sense.
Dajaner 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
TheBigBullshitDebate 4 years ago
Never do the people understand the art of their own time, NEVER!!!, except when the popes and kings were paying the artists. They even said, Mozart had too many notes
GreggaryPeccary 4 years ago 2
damn man i really love this comment
right on buddy i gave u a thumbs up, this comment explains 90% of the crap on all these youtube music videos i watch. all these comments from conservative philistines lol, they are so dim witted but arrogant at same time
LackingLack0 3 years ago
Isn't that part of the Stanley Kubrick 2001 a Space Odysee Soundtrack
VIDEOARTER 4 years ago
No, but Kubrick used other pieces by Ligeti in 2001 and in other films as well.
Bolender 4 years ago
Ligeti is the best thing since Beethoven....
maestroanth 4 years ago
I like this piece, though, this performance, and the props around the performance I didnt like at all. Not one of Ligeti's GREAT works... but a fine work none the less IMO. The performance was crap though.
bet23 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
On behalf of musicians everywhere fuck you.
maestroanth 4 years ago
Is the performance bad or is this a makeshift recording? I think the performance is fine.
Bolender 4 years ago
There's a lot of noise and disturbances - but the performance is good - they play with verve! Ligeti didn't approve of this opus - but I think it's great!
ippolit23 4 years ago
You have to understand that the "noise" and "disturbances" are the music, it's called Atonal music.
shakinjamaican101 4 years ago
Is this supposed to be a funny remark?
ippolit23 4 years ago
Funny in what way? Atonal music, this is what this is, that is the term for this kind of music. I am confused at what you mean by noise and disturbances.
shakinjamaican101 4 years ago
Don't get me wrong. I have heard that piece in various concert halls for many times and also own three or four different recordings. I can very well distinguish between the sound intended by the composer and the rather noisy surroundings. I suspect that the audience was not really up to it. I thought you meant to be funny by suggesting that atonal music is nothing but noise. Sorry about that misunderstanding.
ippolit23 4 years ago
Misunderstanding understood, I thought you were talking about the music having disturbances and noise. I also apologise for the misunderstanding. I have been responding to many people who do not comprehend Atonal music and I misread your comment thinking you were another person that needed explaining to. Sorry about that.
shakinjamaican101 4 years ago
very beautiful work, but this performance is not the best.
anxiousnightingale 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
contemporary music is end of the music!!! Post-modern music is not really...
serjhonn 4 years ago
That's what the critics said about Beethoven's late quartets on first hearing...
Art wouldn't exist if it art wasn't/isn't pushed to the boundaries.
Doppleganger123 4 years ago 4
Ligeti, the pure and absolute music genious of the second part of the 20th century... am i wrong? i really really love his work
elgranrafa 4 years ago 2
The soap-opera, the advertisements, the movies, radio, TV, enable and habituate the people to listen one kind and system of music; there is no understand but habit. Speak a language and can read is necessary to understand Shakespeare, but his work undestanding is not possible 'cause the people just speak.
{It's important to say that this record is bad)
MaestroCanedo 4 years ago
This kind of opinion come certainly of people that believe that they understand the music of Bach or Mozart merely 'cause they can just listen the music. For them, the "right" artist are spontaneuos, don't think, just take the music from the ethereal or the nature. But music, from Bach, Mozart or Beethoven ore Ligeti is product and consequence of thought and intellectual work. The people listen music like speak: from the merely use or exposition. (to continue)
MaestroCanedo 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This kind of music is a great imposture. There are fools thinking to be intellectual or sophisticated why "understand" a music that is not for all, while it is only an error upon an other error.
laurion69 4 years ago
You're the fool that doesn't understand this. Ligeti's works are based on very articulated mathematical models. I love his music and I'm not alone. Kubrick asked him to use his "Lux aeterna" in his movie "2001 a space odyssey". If you are little for this music, go listen pop and don't act like a moron.
sousukesagaraJKD 4 years ago 4
and what does make sense? try to find a sense?
frankcerra 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Simply a music that does not make sense.
laurion69 4 years ago
Fabulous... Awesome, this music! Only Ligeti to compose this...
MrLithar 4 years ago
They never ended the tuning part :S
hugogamelas 4 years ago
Terrific and terrifying.
I was kinda scared that those baby sculptures would come alive...
argentapothecary 4 years ago