I know a few. One pair (brothers) consists of a happy-go-lucky joker and an overly-serious, oft-angry fellow. They are different heights, have different faces (slighty), enjoy different foods, and have lived together since birth.
"I had reached a considerably more relaxed period in my life – a time when I had come to feel that there was more to living than science, a time of awakening of my social consciousness and amiability, a time when I was open to new experiences"
Carl Sagan as Mr x, about his experience with Canabis
Carl Sagan obviously went through a maturity, including in his choice of words; we see this on the Food Channel as they pick chefs to try out for television and many cannot even look at the camera--bam. Carl Sagan refined his look, as someone picked as a media personality.
Disappointing. Sagan doesn't even look at the camera when he speaks in this clip and thus projects no charisma at all. Clearly, this was not the same brilliant person we knew from COSMOS.
Disagree. The fact that he doesn't look at the camera and appears to be so enthralled by what he is reading, even sort of ignoring that we are watching him in the privacy of his office, projects loads of charisma. I think what you mean is he went from being a charismatic young scientist to a to a charismatic science populariser, a showman in many ways.
I think it was a mutual understanding between the talent (Sagan), and the director. It was a different time, a time when all involved could agree that the project was about the science, not the personalities. And so all could agree about keeping the audience's attention focused on the subject matter.
It's a different age now. Science, as with all subjects, must be presented with pizazz, to keep the video/gaming-generation engaged. And "talent" today grasps any opportunity for self-promotion.
Mercury doesn't have much an atmosphere, much less an acidic one. He must have been talking about Venus. Venus's clouds are made up of sulfuric acid. It actually rains sulfuric acid although it evaporates before it reaches the ground because of the high temperatures at lower altitudes.
@amcnea a clone of sagan would be genetically identical to Sagan. However, his personality would be completely independent of that of Sagan. The argument that genetics solely determine one's demeanor is a fallacy; a combination of environmental and perhaps some genetic factors create who we are. Thus, the new being would have some genetic predisposition towards Sagan-like qualities; however, the he would be an individual in his own right. That is, with different intelligence, personality, etc.
First off, the original statement was "This is great, its strange seeing him so young. The world needs more people like Carl."
My reply was, "I agree, I am thinking cloning. I hope someone stored some of his blood."
Are you disputing a clone of Carl Sagan would be Carl Sagan like? Furthermore, I never stated that genetics was the sole determination of demeanor, but I do believe genetics plays a larger role then what you implied. For more details, look at Steven Pinker's work.
@amcnea Genetics play a part, but one's environs ultimately shape than. I'm saying another Carl Sagan cannot exist; this is the wrong idea people associate with cloning. You are not bringing him back; you are merely producing an identical twin.
Twins' genomes are completely identical. However, even if they are raised in the same household and are exposed to the same things, they may grow to be completely different. Forget about cloning someone from the past in a different circumstance
I disagree, do you have evidence to support this view?
"Twins' genomes are completely identical ... [but] they may grow to be completely different"
Actually they tend to be very similar even if separated and raised in different cultures. This is one area Steven Pinker addressed in his work. Which is why I referenced him.
Do you have any evidence or research to back your opinions? Or is this what you just feel like believing?
@amcnea I studied the genetic basis of behavior at Brown. I agree that genetics do have an affect; but, the circumstance in which one lives plays a HUGE part in his personality. A child's surrounding influences have, collectively, a profound impact upon who we are. Carl Sagan grew up in a distinct environment which formed the astronomer we knew and loved.
Ohh, you have studied at Brown. Well, excuse me. I had no idea you were studied at Brown. Well then, I am sure you went into the field, interviewed identical twins, and took cat scans of their brains to compare similarities? You know, like Steven Pinker did. I am sure you are published in such theories and have put your ideas out to be scrutinized by the peer review process? You know, like Steven Pinker did.
Where I can find your published works? I would love to read them?
@cornflakeclusters We need more young people who refuse to limit their learning to the underfunded school programs. People who continue to question the teachers and the text books until they find a more satisfying answer. We need people who don't listen to those who say we CAN'T be like Carl Sagan.
I remember where I was when he died. No other scientist and think has made a better and more positive contribution, or was a better champion for the cause of education to the masses. Men like him are rare. And that is why we need to listen carefully.
life exists on earth where temperatures are close to those on venus and or mercury at their hottest. geysers on the ocean floor have temperatures over 600 degrees fahrenheit i hear - and there are organisms that live next to them.
there are also organisms that live in glacier ice in antarctica. life can exist in many forms.
they also say that there is life on many asteroids. some theorize that asteroids have brought strains of viruses here. this theory is indeed possible!
"there are also organisms that live in glacier ice in antarctica. life can exist in many forms."
The problem is that while life can live in really esoteric and unpleasant(to us) environments, it's somewhat harder for life(as we know it) to ARISE in those inhospitable environments. Once life exists, it can do amazing things to adapt to bizarre a niche, but that doesn't mean that life can begin in that place.
Fantastic! He had such a baby face, the young genius who had his PhD at 26 and went on to rock the world with science, yes, but a scientific conscience more importantly.
Carl Sagan, too awesome to look up.
martini1179 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very tiny sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “autumntree2011” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
(I'm not a fan of Hitler or KKK.)
autumntree2011 3 months ago
The 3 people that disliked this video were the ones that applauded at 0:10
reformedman 4 months ago
Psst! Carl! Look at the camera!
ThisNameIsNotProfane 5 months ago
This video should be called "Carl Before Pot"
theocean1973 9 months ago
@theocean1973
As much as I disagree with that, I completly agree with that.
TheKenTerry 9 months ago
@theocean1973 hahaha
fendertele1988 5 months ago
@amcnea
Twins.
I know a few. One pair (brothers) consists of a happy-go-lucky joker and an overly-serious, oft-angry fellow. They are different heights, have different faces (slighty), enjoy different foods, and have lived together since birth.
taicleis 1 year ago
"I had reached a considerably more relaxed period in my life – a time when I had come to feel that there was more to living than science, a time of awakening of my social consciousness and amiability, a time when I was open to new experiences"
Carl Sagan as Mr x, about his experience with Canabis
dafeac 1 year ago
I love the way things looked back then. The grays, greens and turquoise blues... and it look so clean. When did it become "neat" to be grungy?
ion010101 1 year ago
he looks so much better with longhair
OskIsNotAsian 1 year ago
dibs being like him
danthemanzizzle 1 year ago
"Psst!!! Carl, the camera is over here......"
IlovemyGlock21 1 year ago
he's such a handsome man
xGAARAxGIRLx 1 year ago
Carl Sagan obviously went through a maturity, including in his choice of words; we see this on the Food Channel as they pick chefs to try out for television and many cannot even look at the camera--bam. Carl Sagan refined his look, as someone picked as a media personality.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
One of the greatest scientists in the world. Thanks for this great video document.
satothequeen 1 year ago
Maybe life exists on Venus below the surface!
marasu66 2 years ago
LOL! is sagan so smart he can host a show and read at the same time?
He was the best
nystagmus 2 years ago
I think he thought the camera would be on the sheets at all times based on his pen movements at first
Hellotheres 2 years ago 2
USSR venera. Carl Sagan was unique, what a sad thing for humans now that he is no longer with us.
darkalligator 2 years ago 10
I love the forensic files guys voice.
He has the coolest voice ever.
TheCottonTop 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Disappointing. Sagan doesn't even look at the camera when he speaks in this clip and thus projects no charisma at all. Clearly, this was not the same brilliant person we knew from COSMOS.
DaleHusband 2 years ago
Disagree. The fact that he doesn't look at the camera and appears to be so enthralled by what he is reading, even sort of ignoring that we are watching him in the privacy of his office, projects loads of charisma. I think what you mean is he went from being a charismatic young scientist to a to a charismatic science populariser, a showman in many ways.
CH1CU 2 years ago 30
I think it was a mutual understanding between the talent (Sagan), and the director. It was a different time, a time when all involved could agree that the project was about the science, not the personalities. And so all could agree about keeping the audience's attention focused on the subject matter.
It's a different age now. Science, as with all subjects, must be presented with pizazz, to keep the video/gaming-generation engaged. And "talent" today grasps any opportunity for self-promotion.
TroyOi 2 years ago 4
Good call.
bigkevyredcliffe 1 year ago
Comment removed
pepicanable 1 year ago
Don't blame Sagan. Blame the director of the piece. I'm sure he was just doing as he was told.
lettersfromtheleft 2 years ago 9
GIVE THE NOOB A BREAK!!! LOL
ORACLE063 2 years ago 2
scientist do not clone carl because they are afraid the their clon guy might be smarter than the creators
w1lp34 2 years ago 4
This Carl Sagan didn´t have yet a very modulated voice. He seems shy but he would became such a great communicator
likemusicwhat 2 years ago 6
my astronomer professor said a satellite landed on Mercury and lasted 12 minutes before it was destroyed by the acidic air. lol
NegativeNick 2 years ago
Mercury doesn't have much an atmosphere, much less an acidic one. He must have been talking about Venus. Venus's clouds are made up of sulfuric acid. It actually rains sulfuric acid although it evaporates before it reaches the ground because of the high temperatures at lower altitudes.
Atomicskull 2 years ago 2
His face looks like Rowan Atkinson's.
slashingraven 3 years ago
This is great, its strange seeing him so young. The world needs more people like Carl.
cornflakeclusters 3 years ago 55
and then some.
phurphy 3 years ago 5
I agree, I am thinking cloning. I hope someone stored some of his blood.
amcnea 2 years ago 3
LOL =D
cornflakeclusters 2 years ago
@amcnea a clone of sagan would be genetically identical to Sagan. However, his personality would be completely independent of that of Sagan. The argument that genetics solely determine one's demeanor is a fallacy; a combination of environmental and perhaps some genetic factors create who we are. Thus, the new being would have some genetic predisposition towards Sagan-like qualities; however, the he would be an individual in his own right. That is, with different intelligence, personality, etc.
lolctusachina 1 year ago
@lolctusachina
First off, the original statement was "This is great, its strange seeing him so young. The world needs more people like Carl."
My reply was, "I agree, I am thinking cloning. I hope someone stored some of his blood."
Are you disputing a clone of Carl Sagan would be Carl Sagan like? Furthermore, I never stated that genetics was the sole determination of demeanor, but I do believe genetics plays a larger role then what you implied. For more details, look at Steven Pinker's work.
amcnea 1 year ago
@amcnea Genetics play a part, but one's environs ultimately shape than. I'm saying another Carl Sagan cannot exist; this is the wrong idea people associate with cloning. You are not bringing him back; you are merely producing an identical twin.
Twins' genomes are completely identical. However, even if they are raised in the same household and are exposed to the same things, they may grow to be completely different. Forget about cloning someone from the past in a different circumstance
lolctusachina 1 year ago
@lolctusachina
"but one's environs ultimately shape than"
I disagree, do you have evidence to support this view?
"Twins' genomes are completely identical ... [but] they may grow to be completely different"
Actually they tend to be very similar even if separated and raised in different cultures. This is one area Steven Pinker addressed in his work. Which is why I referenced him.
Do you have any evidence or research to back your opinions? Or is this what you just feel like believing?
amcnea 1 year ago
@amcnea I studied the genetic basis of behavior at Brown. I agree that genetics do have an affect; but, the circumstance in which one lives plays a HUGE part in his personality. A child's surrounding influences have, collectively, a profound impact upon who we are. Carl Sagan grew up in a distinct environment which formed the astronomer we knew and loved.
lolctusachina 1 year ago
@lolctusachina
Ohh, you have studied at Brown. Well, excuse me. I had no idea you were studied at Brown. Well then, I am sure you went into the field, interviewed identical twins, and took cat scans of their brains to compare similarities? You know, like Steven Pinker did. I am sure you are published in such theories and have put your ideas out to be scrutinized by the peer review process? You know, like Steven Pinker did.
Where I can find your published works? I would love to read them?
amcnea 1 year ago
@amcnea will you please suck my dick? nigga
lolctusachina 1 year ago
@lolctusachina
Good to see that Brown still holds it self to the highest standards.
amcnea 1 year ago
@cornflakeclusters We need more young people who refuse to limit their learning to the underfunded school programs. People who continue to question the teachers and the text books until they find a more satisfying answer. We need people who don't listen to those who say we CAN'T be like Carl Sagan.
keetonbob 9 months ago 2
billions and billions... (classic carl phrase)
cottonclubcola 3 years ago 8
I remember where I was when he died. No other scientist and think has made a better and more positive contribution, or was a better champion for the cause of education to the masses. Men like him are rare. And that is why we need to listen carefully.
chopin65 3 years ago 8
life exists on earth where temperatures are close to those on venus and or mercury at their hottest. geysers on the ocean floor have temperatures over 600 degrees fahrenheit i hear - and there are organisms that live next to them.
there are also organisms that live in glacier ice in antarctica. life can exist in many forms.
they also say that there is life on many asteroids. some theorize that asteroids have brought strains of viruses here. this theory is indeed possible!
RebbyPDX 3 years ago
"there are also organisms that live in glacier ice in antarctica. life can exist in many forms."
The problem is that while life can live in really esoteric and unpleasant(to us) environments, it's somewhat harder for life(as we know it) to ARISE in those inhospitable environments. Once life exists, it can do amazing things to adapt to bizarre a niche, but that doesn't mean that life can begin in that place.
ValeofAldur 3 years ago 2
I remember him doing an astronomy show in the early 60s on channel 2 in Boston, my earliest memory of Carl Sagan.
caseyg5 3 years ago
Carl made science interesting. His optimism about exploration was infectious.
rickcain41 4 years ago 14
Fantastic! He had such a baby face, the young genius who had his PhD at 26 and went on to rock the world with science, yes, but a scientific conscience more importantly.
Colorscheme 4 years ago 10
Classic Carl.
Life on Venus was on the menu in'63 I wasn't born yet.
This is great, Nostalgic and I wasn't even there.
MikkalaTube 4 years ago 5
Great! Great! Great! Thanks a lot!!!!
alegareca 5 years ago
wow. i would love to see this whole video!
doctordave 5 years ago 3