Added: 2 years ago
From: R0flCh0pterz
Views: 113,449
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,301)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What a joke. One of our missile subs holds 18 ICBMs that MERV into 12 nuclear warheads each, which equals a total of 196 nuclear warheads, each capable of devastating a metropolis-size city from 4,000 miles away. These boats commonly patrol SE Asia, which spans several million square miles of ocean. The numbers are classified, and their course is plotted by the captain, so not even the Secretary of the Navy or the President knows where they are until they come into port.

  • Alright, let me just point out, as a Canadian, that Canada does not have the bomb. This video shows multiple launches from what seems to be Quebec City and central Ontario.

  • Before I got into war simulations, I'd pick up dictionaries and style guides and learn to communicate in writing first.

  • So The whole of NATO will only launch about 5 nukes at Russia ?

    And like 1 at China while the whole of the Western world is being destroyed ?

    unlikely

  • @nssurge 1 nuke to china will kill over 1 million because they are so densely packed

  • @beastlyman01265 It all depends on the location. A direct nuke hit at Manhattan can kill even more, while a hit in the Gobi desert will probably harm nobody.

  • @RaptureandZune Haha why would NATO fire a nuke into the middle of the Gobi ? They would aim for beijing, Hong Kong, or Moscow

  • @TheQueenIsAHORE Exactly. Back to the initial argument, that means the PRC and Russia would nuke NYC, London, DC as well. By the way, NATO may not nuke Hong Kong due to the large number of EU citizens there.

  • You just recorded yourself playing Defcon?

  • Where's Commander Shephard when you need him?

  • i think in the will be something like caucassian/bloodmixed vs asians, something like all AMERICA continent + europe + russia + india(caucasic if don't believe me)+ arabs vs china japan blinking people lol.

  • *no clue WHAT is going on here*

  • No the Balkans , i can`t hide . :( Fuck NATO

  • Seriously, I really do believe that you are biased. Do the American people really have such low faith in their own nation that they would be 'suprised' so thoroughly [its spelled surprised by the way]? AS for unbiased results, what does your 'simulation' tell you about US and other country nuclear subs, fleets, etc? Or are they also sleeping peacefully? NORAD is a shared Canadian US project, I assume that the Canucks are also missing in action? Bah.

  • russia and china to nato are easy targgets china is so dependant on exports that nato Would blockade its lanes and force them into a naval and aerial battle against america which would cripple their economy china's GDP per capital is 10 times less than the U.S meaning 70-80% of their people live in poverty they cant even provide for their on people ho are they suppose to go to war against NATO? china easy target. , Russians contend with European (U.K,German,french) in the east? NATO wins easy.

  • Oooh goody, I love deadly fallout for breakfast.

  • no the chinese and russia wouldnt attempt to do that or we would fucking nuke them as well and china to

  • you obviously didnt think this through

    

  • If Russia attacks China from the rear will Greece help?

  • i would have to disagree with this. if china and russia/ussr were to join up, we would immediately go to DEFCON 3. if war was declared by china or russia, NATO would immediately begin conventional attacks on russia and china, and they would do the same. if china and russia were to launch, we would go to DEFCON 1, and the combined ICBMs of the US, UK and france would immediately launch on moscow, beijing, shanghai, st petersburg, volgograd, hong kong and other major cities. in short, this would

  • @AnimeBeatlesFan24 happen to the whole of the us, europe, china and russia, not just the us

  • @AnimeBeatlesFan24 I would disagree. If the worlds people find this out, people will over run their own gov't to ensure a truce with everyone. Yes, people will still be killed trying this but, everyone would die if no one did anything. Would you just sit around waiting for someone else to make a plan for you and your family's death? Don't think so.

  • @spareaxe that would happen definitely in europe, probably in america, unlikely in russia, and not a chance in hell in china. in china, the govt. would just send you off to a gulag with your family to work for a bowl of rice a day and then get nuked. in russia, the govt. would probably enact martial law, and see any demonstration as treason against the russian federation. in the us, it might happen, but it might not. in europe, they would revolt against the govt for siding with nuclear war

  • @AnimeBeatlesFan24 Completely agree with your view. I was going to post exactly the same fact that this vid doesn't mention the UK and France counterattacking China/Russia. Since France ia a past victim of invasion (Germany ww2), I could see France taking the initiative against an aggressor and use nukes first.

  • @skypilot5973 i know, and even if it came to nuclear war, china has a no-first-strike policy, which i think is the same with russia. this is completely wrong, because the uk, us, france or possibly israel to start a nuclear war between china/russia and nato/us

  • That sucks, it looks like I'm going to be blown up first.

    I disagree with this simulation. US have more weapons than other countries combined. This clearly shown that US are so weak that we just get blown to pieces. We have enough to blow up China, Russia, & Iran. So by then end of the war. Those countries should all be green too.

  • @kenlee514 We (The US) actaully have enough to blow up the world 900 times over and over. If we were to go down, so would the rest of the world, sadly.... Our + NATO military spending is 72% of the worlds military spending. Nonetheless, mass bloodhsed, but we have weapons at all parts of the world. Wouldn't be beneficial to anyone..

  • Comment removed

  • im dieing? NOOOO

  • this is some fake ass bs. there isn't gonna be a nuke war and us won't be using them if there is every one needs to realize america can shoot down any incoming threat no matter what it is and if we attacked any one we would use bombs that aren't nuclear, thats the best part about having the best military we have the best technology. so every one needs to stop saying use this and that cause we won't be alone russia iran and china will be out gunned this isn't wwII this is modern warfare.

  • @kylewest100 Stealth missles are a reality, stealth bombers are a reality, your armies are heavily outnumbered and out-gunned by Russia or China alone.

    Don't be so sure you're the best.

  • @serpent17412 look i don't care what you have to say cause russia would be the only threat period. china might have a shit load of ppl but numbers count for nothing, haven't you watched 300. Iran would be backed up by russia and china but they couldn't do nothing but sit back and watch. so its just china and russia and they aren't gonna use nukes if they did that would be suicide for them cause close by nato countries have nukes too and america has the ability to shoot down missiles.

  • @kylewest100 You used 300 as a piece of evidence backing your nuclear war theory.

    All arguements you make are invalid.

  • @serpent17412 its just a figure of speech ass hole, if i wanted to be a smartass i would have came up with a more complicated theory, and why should it be complicated its war, war is the most simple thing there is. the human race knows killing best, you pick up what ever you can and try your best to stay alive. so next time you comment don't point out the obvious cause it makes you look even more retarded.

  • Your forgetting about our alley israel.

    400 nukes.

    

  • M.A.D

    mutually assured destruction.

    no one wins.

  • This isn't even a simulation. This is the video game Defcon.

  • everyone know that us and nato would bomb the red army and the chinesse and n koreans to teh stone age

  • earth is a sphere. move your subs to the north. also i think Gibraltar's detroit is large enough to let the entire fleet pass. this is the most moronic strategy i ever seen.

    Darwin.

  • you're just pathetic Americans who love gorging and die from obesity, your nato suck our army ... Suck

  • @Rbkk1000 you can suck my massive cock you brainless twat.

  • How long would the sim actually last?

  • WAIT !? Why did U.S.A. threw a nuclear bomb to Turkey in 0:17 ? They both are in NATO..

  • Nobody wins. Its been that way since that god forsaken weapon was created

  • fuck yeah my state survived! :D

  • Awww douchebags. Why'd they nuke canada? I mean... we're pretty much fucked just cause we're so close, but they threw nukes directly at us too. That's it. Movin to australia. But really, I kinda doubt if the americans would go down without absolutely plastering everyone and anyone who ever looked at them crossways.

  • great idea and good programming/design, but realisation.... there is submarines' launches? And wtf is flying from AUG trought all Africa to Europe? JETS??? Do you know range of carrier-based jet fighter? So, you should remake it to look more realistic.

  • Let's not forget the 11 aircraft carrier carrying F/A18 Hornets etc. and the countless destroyers.

  • fuck nato

  • @maxed150 fuck u too

  • the western countries shouldve just destroyed china in ww3 if this is how they say thank u to them for helping them defend their shitty country from japan

  • @xie584 And only 2 shipyards which build ~90% all US ships:

    "Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding Newport News" in Newport News, Virginia (unique, capable to build aircraft carriers) ~10км² - 3-5 nukes

    and "Electric Boat" in Groton, Connecticut (builds all US submarines) also.

    Fuck this, and they will lose 95 % of navy industry.

    This work will make only 2-3 R-36 (nato SS-18 Satan) or 8 Topol's (SS-27 Sickle B)

  • @xie584 bla-bla-bla. You are typical filipino shit. "800 naval basis"??? LINK IN STUDIO BITCH!!!

    At them only 288 ships. Only 3 ports capable to accept ships class "aircraft carrier" and SSBN:

    Norfolk 25,8 км² (75 ships inc. 5 aircraft carrier) - 5-10 nuke warheads - and this crater.

    San Diego - 3,95 км² - 1-2 nuke

    and Kitsap ~ 3 км² (16 SSBN "Ohio") also largest vault of nuclear weapons in world. This residence evil. Sword of new world order. - 1-2 nuke.(I here 100 would charge)

  • haha crazy,,, you forgot the allies of US surrounding china... and hey! fuck on your face, they will not rich sea near US,,, and fair to be with US they have 800 naval basis all over the world while others don't have any... China is not deserving to lead the world becouse of its greediness...

  • AT 2:32 NOOO BELIN

  • Comment removed

  • And of course whether your vassals and slaves in Europe, Africa, Asia, South America will go behind your masono-sectarian government making satanist ceremonies and changing a paper on gold, when you lose power to control them? And if "yes" - as long they for you go?

  • American high technologies... Where for creation 1 plane, or rocket need thousand different factories which can't the friend without friend participate. Your army ready to LOW "technologies"?

    Fleet.. How many in US ports, capable to accept on service ship of class "aircraft carrier"? three or five? it only one ICMB.

  • But Russian 3000 500kt warheads against American cities where in center town stone constructions, and on suburb private houses from gypsum cardboard and plastic, where walls cut saw, punched even blow of hand and burn as matches...uuuuuu...you only imagine it. Paradise for nuclear explosion.

  • @RS00023 Can i have some of what you are smoking? Not very often you see a person write out such a list of B.S. with nothing to back it up.

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE yours "3,000 500kt" "weapons" against China where 70% population and industry in countryside - nothing.

  • a few problems with this. one, Russia and China hate each other. two, since WWII no one is stupid enough to outright attack the USA. and three, the USA and Russia are actually very close allies.

    if you said Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea, China, etc team up. I would agree with you more but still very unlikely.

  • hey look at the east coast of america not one scrach lolz

  • @JCH3006 ohhhhh nevermind.......

  • Yeah! Nuke those american bastards!

  • Who needs property in South Africa? The true land of the free!

  • This game is cool !

  • I love how they didn't bomb Nova Scotia!

  • A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  • Imagine if this came to happen nearly 50 years ago... a lot of us wouldnt be here or ill with some radiation disease

  • Nuclear war is pointless. Nobody would win because we would all be dead.

  • @waterninja8 not if you live in South Africa!

  • Name of the song?

    

  • so wtf does this mean? the most advanced military in the world gets smoked right off the bat even tho we have missile defense tht they havnt even began to build or figure out? Like everything made in china, this video is a shame.

  • First, I honestly think that the United States has a better missile defense system than we let people know. Second, within 30 minutes of any war between china and or russia and the united states we will destroy their missile launch sites

  • @DJgodrocks2 I concur. We are at least 50 years ahead of where the global community thinks we are.

  • Seriously? The whole chuck norris thing was funny like 8 years ago.. Time to move on bud

  • Clearly whoever made this video isnt aware at all of current world events, or the fact that neither china or russia can even come close to launching a nuke without the US,Europe,and Israel wiping them off the face of the planet. GOOD LUCK CHINA

  • australia one ,, this was our plan the whole time,, look up brabeery or what ever that auzzy ice skater name is, he was agenst the best in the world ,, they all fell over and he got a gold medal ,, eny way do u want to buy some more uranium ?? u can have as much as u want ,, !!! oh well at the end of the day can they afford the carbon credits for this war ???

  • good thing i live in australia :)

    

  • You left our the mightiest of fighters the Aussies.....

  • i love how this song is always used for these kind of dramatic simulations

  • this video russian nerd dreams

  • Interesting simulation.

    However, you leave out the 14 Ohio Class SSBNS that are constantly patrolling the coasts of these countries.

    Each Ohio Class SSBN carries 24 Trident II missiles.

    Eash Trident II missile can deliver four 475kt weapons or eight 100kt weapons.

    This translates into 1,344 475kt weapons or 2,688 100kt weapons.

    The Trident II has a range of 7,000 miles and travels at 13,422 miles per hour.

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE The Sino-Soviet split is also a factor, pending on current relations between Russia and China.

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE America Fuck Yeah!!! Glad there our number one allie

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE Good point. The Navy rocks!!!

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE l0l owned him

  • @CancermanNIGHTMARE Yeah he mised that, also where are the russian subs?

  • Lol you do know evidence just came up that US has more Nuke's than China and Russia right? Chinese would get owned Russia would be say damn...then would submit. All Hail Europe and NORTH AMERICAN CONTINENT, India and Australia are awesome also :)

  • you forgot to add that china and russia would be blown back to the stoneage

  • You know the US has nuke subs the would fuk up China Right/

  • why exactly is Canada bombing the US?!

  • @m0rbusPolytox

    That wouldn't be Canada. Russian and U.S. missiles would come in over the pole. It's a shorter distance.

  • hurra die sowjets gewinnen!

  • USA and Europe looks fucked.

  • It's time to move to Australia!!!

  • africa wins @@

  • что за хуйня китай никогда не вступит в союз с россией, если конечно мы не отдадим им часть восточных территорий нашей страны. Скорее америка подчинит себе этот лживый мир. у вас американцев дохуя ядерного оружия и флот напорядок мощнее российского, поэтому нехер тут пиздеть про бедную несчастную америку, что лежит в руинах. Америка подобно куску дерьма никогда не утонет, разве что засрет все вокруг себя, весь земной шар, своей лживой демократией.

  • @MrGary3289 HE SAID:

    that the garbage China will never enter into an alliance with Russia, unless of course we will not give them part of the eastern territories of our country. Rather, America subdue this deceitful world. You Americans Doha nuclear weapons and more powerful Russian fleet naporyadok so neher then complain about the poor poor America, which lies in ruins. America is like a piece of crap will never drown, except that zasret all around, the globe, its false democracy.

  • @xXgAvInArNoLdXx

    this is more correctly.

  • Ahh the ole' "Surprise!! Our nuclear equipped fleet of ships snuck up on the worlds number one nuclear capable war mongering paranoid country!" trick.. Would never happen, what a lame scenario.

  • Why is europe all times such....fucked from east and West? Caus we are the kingdom of middle, that means your fucked up by invaders.

  • Southern Hemisphere just chillin'.

  • Ha they don't ev en show how flatten russia and china would be from a single u.s. sub alone. But neither here nor there for surly everyone and everything living would be dead in a matter of days maaaybe weeks. That's how I see it...

  • holy shite, that last comm. xxazurenekoxx hit the nail right on the motha fu*in head! its that Fed up i do believe it would go down very similarly almost to the tee! well put buddyguy! :-)

  • A war between the US and China would be awkward. US would be all like "Now I'm never paying you back." Then Russia would say "Stop picking on meh buddeh!"D< Then NATO would be like "Trolol, bitches please." Then America would be all "Come at me bro."...Whatever, in the end, we're all screwed.

  • russia/china/arabs r the evil forces of this world

  • @dan3nad are u sure about that.

  • xD great in live in nicaragua and dont happend nothing great :)

  • Good stuff being brazilian these days =)

  • thank god i in singapore a very little island now it big

  • I am moving to Argentina, no bombs there

  • yep

    

  • NATO's got nukes stashed everywhere. They'd prob be the first to drop.

  • That's it.. im moving to Australia, mate!

  • @jojjepojje You can come stay at my house :)

  • It's amazing how huge those bombs are. Not even factoring in the fallout they leave behind. We are all so amazingly stupid.

  • i am nowhere near the nukes :p

  • It's good time to be in Africa

  • This is so fucking retarded lmao. All those nuclear explosions would create deadly fallout which would get into the air-current and make the ENTIRE planet in-hospitable. Other countries would intervene in a war against countries with nuclear weapons and ultimately be silenced. So this simulation is a failure.

  • depressing....:(

  • in this situation...we need a chuck norris on every state to just tap the bomb back

  • Ok Guys, Follow me to Africa ! ;D

  • South America and Africa :Troll Face: lol

  • Canada doesn't even have nukes, and yet from north america thats the only place launching them? o.0

  • ...and again in the middle of the biggest mess is Poland. Our ancestors have picked up the worst place ever to settle. It is time to move our country to Australia :)

  • wtf man why so many missles shooting at america?! thats like the only place getting hit in the first minute of the video.... bullshit! :(

  • @TheAnimefreak1000000 Why not ?

  • @TheAnimefreak1000000 Because you're the most hated country on the planet, deal with it lol

  • me no like u u made britain get attacked ur mean britain did nothing to make them launch nukes on us

  • Why does Russia fuck up everyone? WE wouldve found out that they were building nukes, so we wouldve done the same. Yet we get fucked up like Africa

  • Wouldn't you prefer a nice game of chess?

  • @bartosh2010 Aha, good movie

  • Australia would not be safe... the USA is hitting SE Asia, Samoa, New Zealand, Australia within the next few years to compete with China... Watch the news every now and then... not to mention the hundreds of island nations... come one now... one nuke attack on the US... and trust me we're all dead. If Ron Paul, for instance; had his way... those places would not be inhabited by the US. All the bases would be closed, and the USA would be totally helpless against such attacks.

  • @jsnsexton Ron Paul is the best candidate for the U.S precisely because he's isolationist when it comes to foreign policy. But the American people do not deserve him. Your warmonger people deserve to start a WW3 and then be massively nuked.

  • @apresesco hehe,, i saw yesterday a similar comment under a RT video.

    xD

  • @wichreligion :o)

  • @apresesco Leave the Nukes alone!!! Bad nukes... bad!

  • @jsnsexton that's beautiful, but the U.S. has nukes and refuses to get rid of these weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, other countries need to develop nukes to protect themselves from U.S. nuclear threat.

  • What the hell kinda retarted shit was that? First off a fleet would never make it to our shores. Second the second a nuclear missle launched the US would have about 1,100 nukes dropping all over Russia, and China. Yet in your stupid video it like shows 6 maybe 7 nukes hitting Russia, and China. You sir are an absolute dumb ass and need a new hobby.

  • TURKISH WORLD WITH TURKEY KAZAKHSTAN AZERBAIJAN OZBEKISTAN KIRGISTAN TURKMENISTAN UIGUSRTAN AND MUSLIM REPUBLICS ARABIC IS THE BIGGEST WORLD...

  • the US got owned

  • it's a video game retards.

  • This one is chilling. 

  • the fallout is affecting all northern mexico,they didn't do anything.

  • And then the US launches all of their nukes and the world is over.

  • @Eclipsinq Russia has more Nuclear Weapons than the US, and yet you blame us for the end of the war?

  • @mrcereal16 у американцев намного больше ядерного оружия; их экономика может себе это прозволить в отличае от российской. Ну а война будет, это лишь вопрос времени.. но просто так они нас не нагнут)

  • A small cock Asian made this shitty video.

  • First of all Yes.. China and russia BOTH are protecting Iran.. So yes, china and Russia teamed up

  • @canons20091 They aren't guard dogs for Iran in case of invasion. They are just backing up Iran with military small arms and words of "friendship". If the US were to attack Iran, China and Russia were not to intervene.

  • @Brian91506 We will intervene.

  • Worst sim ever. America would first nuke the middle of china. This would take out 90% of the military. Everything else is unrealistic. Japan and Australia would be one of the first nuked due to blocking China from the Pacific ocean.

  • music is awesome

  • Japan, Africa, and Austrailia=SAFE!

  • the americans always think's the russian federation is the bad in all histories , please stop watching movies

  • Wait, China and Russia teaming up? That will never happen and before trolls come on here swearing and blurting crap they don't critically think about, Look at the Relations between India and Russia and then the relations between Pakistan and India and then China and Russia. K thanks :D

  • @owen82100

    dude russia was communist but china is communist so they combine