Personally wwe being PG is not the problem i think that wwe are just biest and give cena and orton the spotlight wwe needs to give other ppl the spotlight cuz god forbid orton and cena get a carrer ending injury then what do you do then?
@WWERandomvideos15 You are a PG Lover arent ya do you have a screaming 5 year old son at home who watches John Cena well f**k him PG Is the problem because there is no blood allowed make him watch Barney the f****ing dinosour instead of WWE Cena fan.
Personally wwe being PG is not the problem i think that wwe are just biest and give cena and orton the spotlight wwe needs to give other ppl the spotlight cuz god forbid orton and cena get a carrer ending injury then what do you do then?
Even if WWE were TV-14, excessive bleeding and chair shots to the head should forever b banned. U guys want realistic? The bumps wrestlers take r as real as they come. Some moves require certain tricks to avoid injuries and deaths but for the most part, the only thing "fake" about wrestling is the fact that there r storylines. I don't like blood but it's pretty ridiculous that matches r paused to wipe it off. If the blood's real, keep the match going. It's blade jobs I'm totally against.
Cont. It would b great if WWE found a middle ground wherein their programming doesn't have to contain the overly violent and/or sexual content the Attitude Era had nor do they have to b as cheesy as they've been from 2009-2010 when their initial idea of PG was in full effect. It seems like they're getting it right this time and have realized it is possible to have an edgy program with a PG rating. I think The Rock and Stone Cold's returns have proven that along with CM Punk's weekly rants.
PG is definitely NOT the problem. I enjoyed the Attitude Era for what it was and it will always b my favorite period in wrestling but I don't want it back. I could care less about the rating and the thing PG cured WWE of was all the unecessary bleeding and head shots. What I hate is WWE's idea of PG having to equate to corny by resorting to camp humor, childish segments and overly simplistic storylines.
@Mr1131988 Look what we have here another Cena fan who says PG Is not the problem f**k pg they can suck my a** listein to Disturbed Slipknot Korn or Drowning Pool instead stop lisining to Justin F****ing Bieber or Nicki Minaj watck The Rock and like TV 14 Instead ya jerk!
I agree with the other stuff you way. To add to that, they should bring back the Hardcore and European belts to give more wrestlers a spotlight. But PG is really part of the problem. What would happen if shows like Dexter or Weeds went to PG? It would suck. Lets not forget that WWE is still a show. If WWE brings back TV-14, wrestlers will be more entertaining because they won't have to make themselves to be all kid-friendly and corny. Just look at Cena before WWE went PG. Now people boo him
@jaguar94able My bad, Cena was likable till he dropped the rapper gimmick around 2006. But my point is that TV-14 will create better storylines and give the wrestlers more freedom to say or do whatever they want. But as for now, everything is dumbed down.
@REDRAPIST Yeah I loved Rapper Cena and TV14 Attitude era, but wouldn't TV14 overuse cussing and blood? I think they should stay PG but still let the wrestlers say what they. Kinda like mature PG.
@REDRAPIST I prefer TV-14 because wrestlers will have more freedom to say or do what they want. At the same time, there's so much that can b done with PG despite the limitations. PG or not, as a fan I could do away with too much blood or overly sexual content. When The Rock returned, I realized PG wasn't the problem. From 2009-2010, I was so fed up with their programming that I quickly blamed the rating but now I understand good writing and character development will triumph over everything.
@Mr1131988 I totally agree with most of your points but I think saying the segments and other content is childish is kinda false, mostly because sure they don't cuss but they certainly don't have promos where the argue like children.
@WCWnumba1 Good point. It's not the lack cussing that makes it childish 2 me. What made PG corny 2 me before Rock, Austin and Punk started using foul language this year was all the campy segments with Hornswoggle, D-X, John Cena and all the dumb guest hosts. I know WWE can b comedic once in a while but drop the dumb jokes. Even some G-rated comedies r funnier than that. Santino Marrella may portray an Italian stereotype but at least his jokes r witty.
What was the last time you saw someone from the PG era say ASS BITCH DAMN b4 The Rock came back that NEVER! heppend
Ive NEVER seen that for 7 YEARS
no 1 ever dimensioned the Attitude but The Rock
and when you said We have seen Blood in the PG era thats BULLSHIT seeing someones noise Bleed ain't shit for Example: the other week on Smackdown Cody Rhodes was Bleeding and all the cosmetics had to Hide it Before all the little bitches get a seizure.
Well no offence but you kinda insulted me..... :/ I want chair shots and tlc matches and street fights but i want them in WWE not freakin TNA....I Guess my opinion doesnt fucking matter.....
I agree 100 percent, Sean. Current WWE is like a PS3: It has something for everyone! It's not what it used to be, but I still enjoy it, and will keep enjoying it. And people, PG isn't and era, it's a TV rating. I don't think this era has a name yet. WWE Universe era, perhaps? I know, it sounds kind of ridiculous.
i think the might need a another bigger show or make superstars BIG! cause if they get some main eventers they will get more viewers. its borring seeing yoshi totsu(whos time is upp and needs to goo) wrestle tyler recks. its annoying. push em or put on raw or smackdowrn or release em. thats what i dont get. and make alex riley a bigger star
Many of these people know absolutely nothing about TV rating system, WWE's use or it, and their history of using it. I'll admit, I hated the PG rating before I did any kind of research, because I was part of that typical IWC bandwagon. Now, after doing research on this stuff, I gained so much logic and realized what the problems are.
Also, PG IS A TV RATING, NOT AN ERA. Eras have always been named after what was advertaised, since Rock N Wrestling. Therefore, 2008-2011 was The Universe Era.
@AJ36sXe You are mostly right, except eras are known by more than advertising. The 1980's are called an era based on the time frame (though the 1980's era actually extended to 1994 when the New Generation began). Rock And Wrestling was only 1983-1985, not the whole 1980's era. People in the industry call this the PG era, so I have no problem saying it. What is dumb is smarks ignore the DEBACLE Ruthless Aggression era and pretend WWF went right from Attitude to PG for no reason at all.
@LynnLeapord Good for you, I like the PG era too. The most fun thing about liking the PG era is being hated on by all the mutant web smarks (who all watch the PG stuff just to whine and piss about it). The talent now is way beyond the losers McMahon had a few years ago. No more WCW / ECW wash out losers like Steroid Steiner, Goldturd, RVD, Tommy Dreamer, etc. All the young flops like Booby Lashley, Rob Conway, Mohammed Hassan, Chris Masters, etc. are gone too. The roster now is way better.
Man 4get about the PG era.......now we are in the New Altitude ERAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!! and i heard there gonna be something new very soon...i cant say anything yet its a secret....WWE is coming to a new start/...one clue is their channel coming in 2012....more clues would come......... .....
@GeekedUpShaqyRocks You are 100% full of crap and are making stuff up. For 1 thing, Linda McMahon is running for Senate again in 2012, so Vince McMahon is not going to do anything that would tarnish or scandalize her, though Linda quit WWF many years ago. Second, McMahon has many long term deals signed with major companies, such as Mattel, Pepsi, 7-11, et cetera, which REQUIRE McMahon to maintain the PG rating. The corporate web site says right on it the company is dedicated to PG entertainment
@iseebwoii Where do you make up these fake era names? 1990 - 1997 was NOT a Golden era as the entire wrestling industry was on its butt and almost totally died. What is commonly called the Golden era by wrestling fans and those in the business is the 1950's when television made wrestling first explode. 1997 - 2001 is the Attitude Era. There was no pre Attitude era as the era before Attitude was called New Generation. You really think Doink, Vader, and Shamrock were huge, entertaining, stars?
yeah seans damn right............before in the golden era hulk hogan, ric flair bret hart, shawn michaels, vader, mankind etc they made the show great back in the early 1990's then in the mid 90s WCW competed with WWF and beated them.
then vince mcmahon used his brain and started the attitude era with guys like stone cold , the rock, undertaker as a ministry/biker kane kurt angle etc. they introduced more bloodshed. hot divas etc. THEN came PG era with john cena and his babyface crew.
@iseebwoii This is ridiculously stupid, but common on the smark and dirt sheet nonsense on the web. The Attitude era DID NOT lead directly to the current PG era. Smarks and dirt sheets ignore the SUPER FAILED Ruthless Aggression era from when Attitude was finally declared dead in 2002 until PG started in 2008. At first during Ruthless Aggression blood, smut, violence, and all the smark loved crap was ramped up, whixch led to financial disaster in 2003. From 2004-2008 content was made cleaner
@mcsweeney24 Yes, it is too much to ask. I do not see you or any of the other blood crazed smarks tearing your heads open with razors like you want wrestlers to do. No need to risk disease transmission, staph infections, and other health risks to appease a few mutant smarks. There will always be accidents where guys get busted open, but blade jobs are gone for good. As Bret Hart said, you are not fooling any body any more with blade jobs, so there is no place for them in modern wrestling.
@MRobert21 valid point...but as for me and my friends tearing my head open...im not getting paid and ive been told to NOT TRY THIS AT HOME so i mean i leave it to the professionals but its not like i want guys bleeding every Monday but i dont think its too much to ask for a little bit of ''realness'
@mcsweeney24 You want "realness" (though most of the world besides you know wrestling is 100% FAKE). What "real" sport or entertainment form do performers slice themselves open with razors in? NONE. In "real" sports or entertainment when there is an injury involving blood, action is stopped and the injury is immediately addressed, just like in McMahon's company now at days. I knew you would come up with a CHICKEN reason to not injure yourself like you stupidly demand these people to do.
@MRobert21 believe me dude....if i was being paid to razor myself id have no problem with it...there would be no need for blood if i could be more intrigued by storylines as the storylines of today SUCK
@mcsweeney24 I shall now ignore you as my work on you is done on this video here after this final comment since you have given up your lame attempts at trying to defend your mutant blood lust and are now just in generic web smark "story lines suck" mode. You EPIC FAILED to demonstrate any reason sports entertainers should slice themselves open for your perverse amusement. No, I do not believe you since you are like all the other web smarks who live vicariously through others bleeding and hurting
Also they need the cruiserweight belts back . that was my favourite part of the wcw, and its the best part of tna to have the x division. I didnt agree with your slating of tna, the problem with tna is hogan. I do like how HHH has put alot more into tag teams but now it seems theres an overload of tag team matches. lets get some gregory helmes vs billy kidman or something. Evan bourne vs justin gabriel
what it needs is prolonged storylines. The nwo span on for years and years. Michael cole being an ass was a great story line but then it just ended one day and now he and Lawler are buddies again.
I agree with making the intercontinetal and us belts bigger! I like dolph ziggler and cody rhodes as champions but they need more of a push than facing randy orton for rhodes' example. Because once randy orton wins that match it makes the intercontinental belt meaningless!
you say that the pg is not the problem. You say if you want blood and violence watch tna, and tna is not getting great ratings. Just to tell you that in the 90's there was ecw that was like tna and wwe was pg those days. then wwe turned the product up side down to tv-14 and it did it's best ratings ever. so what you said doesn;t make that lot of sense when it comes to, " if you want violence watch tna, tna is not successful" . Thanks. Love to listen to your episodes.
@NEWGENERATIONv1 In the darkest days of WCW and WWF in the 1990's, they were always making way more $ being PG than ECW did with its smut, violence, and trash. Even after ECW toned down when ECW got on pay per view and national cable television, it still never made $. That is not even counting what super business disasters ultra trash companies like CZW, XPW, and IWA - MS have been. If people wanted TV14 crap, people would watch TNA, which nobody does watch because nobody wants that garbage.
the wwe was at it's best back in the early to mid 90s, it's been getting worse and worse since the late 90's, there needs to be more feuds like there used to be, and I miss when all the wrestlers were on Raw and Smackdown didn't exist.
@MrDCfan93 Really, you think WWF was at its best early to mid 1990's when nobody was watching the show and WWF lost so much $ that it almost closed for good. I quit watching WWF totally from 1994-1998 because it stunk so bad. WWF today is way better financially and creatively than it was during most of the 1990's. The over all talent roster is way younger and deeper than it was then. WWF has always had secondary shows, they just used to not be as popular and profitable as Smackdown is now.
@reyjed619 Really, Vince McMahon's company is failing huh? I guess that is why The WWF has made a profit despite a GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEPRESSION every fiscal quarter of every year since 2004. I guess that is why JP Morgan Chase Bank just gave Vince McMahon a $200 million loan to expand his business with his new television network and increased digital content. Major banks often like to give hundreds of millions of $ to failing businesses, so the banks themselves will not get the $ back and fail.
I agree with you that they need to make fewer but better matches on RAW but they are stating to do that with Some midcarders. The JoMo vs ADR was a good match. I say WWE needs to make SD! better.
@RonnShad It is because smarks love to piss and moan. They watched and pissed and moaned just the same when it was TV14. If McMahon went TV-MA tomorrow, they would piss and moan just the same. This is why McMahon usually wisely ignores the smarks, Smarks get off whining and crying and acting like know it all experts when they know NOTHING whether the rating is TV-Y or TV-MA. Just have a laugh at the smarks and take them with a grain if salt as I do. Their complaining is just humorous.
@RonnShad $ talks and bull crap walks as the saying goes. Petitions mean nothing. If the smarks want PG gone then all they have to do is collect their pennies and pay McMahon the few hundred million $ he would lose in advertising, investors, sponsorships, and rights fees to replace PG. Instead, the smarks just piss and moan and sign their worthless petitions online nobody cares about. When the smarks make over a BILLION $ at wrestling like McMahon has, then I will listen to them over him.
the pg of this era isnt the problem, the brand expansion is the problem you mentioned making the intercontinental and u.s. title relevant that can never happen as long as there are 2 world champions
@UnifiedaxxS You are 100% right. Smarks blame everything on PG, but most changes have nothing to do with PG. Chair shots and lots of mover were banned as part of safe style to prevent concussions and neck injuries, such as what retired Edge and Austin. Blading was banned to prevent disease transmission and staph infections. All of this is a part of the Wellness Policy to make wrestlers healthier and I am all for it. Smarks can watch TNA and indie crap if they want to see that type of junk.
@MRBOBTHEROB1TV You are 100% right. I was skeptical of the current PG Era when it started in 2008, but it has been really good. It is not terrible as WWF was when it was PG and lousy from 1992-1997. WWF is WAY better now than it was in the Ruthless Aggression crap Era from 2002-2007. I was watching some old crap shows from back then and if PG means I never have to see Al Wilson, Katie Vick or Doctor Heiny again to name a few old crap angles, then I am 100% for PG lasting forever.
@Jonster13ify I am 34 years old and I love the PG Era. When I was 20 years old I loved the Attitude Era, but then I grew up. That is what happened to the Attitude Era was all us Attitude Era fans grew up (except for a few socially retarded web smarks) and they quit watching the smut and trash. It was time to move to a family and kid centered product to build a new audience (actually McMahon should have gone PG 5 years before he did). The WWF I grew up on was PG in the 1980's, so PG is good.
@AwesomeOne513 It is just smarks being smarks, so ignore them. Before McMahon went PG in 2008, they all still pissed and moaned about the show. The smarks pissed and moaned about all the trashy crap like exploding limos, humping corpses, lesbian plots, et cetera, so McMahon eliminated all that garbage and the smarks still complain. PG draws $ period. PG has drawn more sponsors, advertisers, investors, rights fees, and other $, which is why it is here to stay no matter who hates on it.
@TheDieHardWWEAddict Thank you very much. Near 4 years of smarks pissing and whining about PG. As Randy Orton has said, if they do not like it, then please stop watching. When I did not like wrestling in the past, I just quit watching for a while, I did not piss and moan about it all the time. All I care about is that the company makes $ and stays in business entertaining me whether it is rated G or XXX. 2003 when the company was trashiest was when WWF last lost $ before it changed.
@TheDieHardWWEAddict I accepted it and I like it. I hated feeling dirty when watching crap like Doctor Heiny and Vince blowing himself up and now I do not need to feel that way any more. The PLANET is in a GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEPRESSION. Considering companies are going out of business all over the place, I think Vince McMahon is doing just fine. They sold out Summerslam for over a million $ live gate alone and have done the same already for Survivor Series. Not too bad in my opinion.
The WWE needs better Writers... FINALLY SOMEONE WHO AGREES WITH ME! Hence one reason I started SWS, although I think WWE is watching and copying my ideas. Think about it, Kanes Heel turn in '08? The appearance of Nikki Bella in '08 after Brie Bellas debut? CM Punk ruining Rey's Daughters birthday before Mania 26? Similar stuff happened in my videos before those. Coincidence? But still, a lot of the storylines in WWE are a little stale and repetitive.
Man they need that unpredictible element in wrestling. your video is kinda meaninless this time when you think of a star like Stone cold steve Austin .
Despite the PG rating, WWE still does well enough with or without it. It can be debated that the PG rating strayed away loyal fans or if it attracted more fans, I really don't know which is more true. I'd like it if they didn't have the PG rating, but who am I to complain? If it works for them, keep it. If they really wanted to, don't you think they would have went Y7 by now if they wanted to please kids that much?
Yes the PG Era isn't killing WWE but I still hate it! TNA's ratings aren't low because of blood and chair shots to the head! It's LOW BECAUSE TNA IS UN-INTERESTING AND STUPID! Blood and Chair Shots have nothing to do with it! It's just because TNA sucks! I don't need blood and chair shots to the head! WWE is just boring to me. There writing and their booking sucks! That's why I don't like WWE! But TNA is still worst no matter what!
They really do need to allow other stars to shine & a good way to do that is to take John Cena out of every single main event & allow other guys to build up their Star power. John Cena has got to start putting other talent over clean & I really do believe a Cena Heel turn would only do good for the business as it would open the door for Cena's fans to find a new hero & stop making everything about Cena.
@TheDieHardWWEAddict I would say that is generally true. Attitude Era smarks are just silly. It is gone and not coming back. What is stupid is all the Attitude Era stuff is on the web and video, so if people like that, then just watch it. People can watch TNA and all the other trash indie companies that do blood, smut, potty mouthing, and other crap if they need to see it. There is no need to piss and moan about current PG if people want to live in the past. Times always change.
right now wwe is being good right now i can see the tag team division making a come back evan bourne and kofi are great together but their name sucks lol and R truth and the miz is gold right now
I thumbed this video up for addressing the attitude era smarks at the beginning of this vid. Those guys apparently don't seem to realize WWE (or rather WWF at the time) was TV-PG for years (decades even) and they continued to be a successful company.
I agree. I don't think PG is the problem at all. It is just a rating at the top of the tv screen. It doesn't mean jack. I wish some of the stubborn people in the IWC would get that through their heads.
@NightRanger71379 You are 100% right, but you are wasting your time trying to be rational and reasonable with the smarks because they enjoy pissing, moaning, and acting like know it alls no matter what the rating is. Fact is WWF started toning way down in 2004 4 years before the official move to PG in 2004 because 2003 with smut, violence, and trash was a financial disaster, As HHH said recently, people used to say ass 100 times a show and nobody cared, now somebody says ass once and it is big
Bring the World Tag Team Titles Let The Us And Intercontinental Championship have its prestige. Younger Talent or make a new brand for people that dont get oppurtunities
Triple H in the attitude era was the same as Cena and Orton today. HHH was always champ and always in the title picture.
So often was Stone Cold, The Rock, Undertaker and Kurt Angle.
The theme has been going on for decades, but if you can't see it, that means you just really hate todays WWE and it is time to give it up and move on in life, cos the WWE sure has.
PG Era is fine. It makes money, we are the has been audience, we aren't where the money is.
The kids of today are. The WWE broke away from the 80s, and focused on the kids of the 90s, people like me. So it is normal for them to now focus on the kids of today, get the fuck over it people.
the problem with wwe is the fact that they flash too much of the same superstars instead of giving everybody a chance don't get me wrong I've been a fan of cena since he started but even i need a break from you can't see me
@kinglarry12 WRONG, EVERYTHING on McMahon produced television shows is PG. If it was not PG, the government could fine and jail McMahon for putting a false rating on the shows as well as pull the shows and the networks off the air. Read the corporate web site and the company mission statement clearly says it is to provide PG programming. Smarks just like to pretend the stuff they like is not PG while the stuff they hate is PG. WWF was PG from 1983-1996, then resumed PG in 2008.
@kinglarry12 I do not know why you are typing this at me KID, but WWF programming during most of the Attitude Era and all of the Ruthless Aggression trash era was TV14 (this is according to American content ratings) before McMahon wisely changed to PG. I do not know if some foreign country used a different rating or edited something to be PG on an international WWF broadcast. There is very little difference between PG and TV14. TV-Y, TV-Y7, TV-Y7-FV, and TV-G are all lower ratings for kids .
@humankiller99 Ya you tell him PG Sucks Attitude Rules screw that guy SVETV988 AKA Sean for loving PG if The Rock Beats John Cena at Wrestlemania i would be very happy because The Rock is definitly Better than Cena thumbs up also if you want Stone Cold to host Wrestlemania this year and WWE TO go back to TV 14 Sorry Sean me and humankiller99 also hate PG Go and cry yourself to sleep with Cena posters in your room.
I just want to see some blood and shorten all the talking on the microphone so wwe just shut up and fight
wwekane1999 1 week ago
Personally wwe being PG is not the problem i think that wwe are just biest and give cena and orton the spotlight wwe needs to give other ppl the spotlight cuz god forbid orton and cena get a carrer ending injury then what do you do then?
WWERandomvideos15 3 months ago in playlist WWERandomvideos15's favorites
@WWERandomvideos15 You are a PG Lover arent ya do you have a screaming 5 year old son at home who watches John Cena well f**k him PG Is the problem because there is no blood allowed make him watch Barney the f****ing dinosour instead of WWE Cena fan.
MrFreddykreuger11 2 weeks ago
Personally wwe being PG is not the problem i think that wwe are just biest and give cena and orton the spotlight wwe needs to give other ppl the spotlight cuz god forbid orton and cena get a carrer ending injury then what do you do then?
WWERandomvideos15 4 months ago
Even if WWE were TV-14, excessive bleeding and chair shots to the head should forever b banned. U guys want realistic? The bumps wrestlers take r as real as they come. Some moves require certain tricks to avoid injuries and deaths but for the most part, the only thing "fake" about wrestling is the fact that there r storylines. I don't like blood but it's pretty ridiculous that matches r paused to wipe it off. If the blood's real, keep the match going. It's blade jobs I'm totally against.
Mr1131988 4 months ago
Cont. It would b great if WWE found a middle ground wherein their programming doesn't have to contain the overly violent and/or sexual content the Attitude Era had nor do they have to b as cheesy as they've been from 2009-2010 when their initial idea of PG was in full effect. It seems like they're getting it right this time and have realized it is possible to have an edgy program with a PG rating. I think The Rock and Stone Cold's returns have proven that along with CM Punk's weekly rants.
Mr1131988 4 months ago
Comment removed
Mr1131988 4 months ago
PG is definitely NOT the problem. I enjoyed the Attitude Era for what it was and it will always b my favorite period in wrestling but I don't want it back. I could care less about the rating and the thing PG cured WWE of was all the unecessary bleeding and head shots. What I hate is WWE's idea of PG having to equate to corny by resorting to camp humor, childish segments and overly simplistic storylines.
Mr1131988 4 months ago
@Mr1131988 Look what we have here another Cena fan who says PG Is not the problem f**k pg they can suck my a** listein to Disturbed Slipknot Korn or Drowning Pool instead stop lisining to Justin F****ing Bieber or Nicki Minaj watck The Rock and like TV 14 Instead ya jerk!
MrFreddykreuger11 2 weeks ago
I agree with the other stuff you way. To add to that, they should bring back the Hardcore and European belts to give more wrestlers a spotlight. But PG is really part of the problem. What would happen if shows like Dexter or Weeds went to PG? It would suck. Lets not forget that WWE is still a show. If WWE brings back TV-14, wrestlers will be more entertaining because they won't have to make themselves to be all kid-friendly and corny. Just look at Cena before WWE went PG. Now people boo him
REDRAPIST 4 months ago
@REDRAPIST I see your points but people hated him before PG too.
jaguar94able 4 months ago
@jaguar94able My bad, Cena was likable till he dropped the rapper gimmick around 2006. But my point is that TV-14 will create better storylines and give the wrestlers more freedom to say or do whatever they want. But as for now, everything is dumbed down.
REDRAPIST 4 months ago
@REDRAPIST Yeah I loved Rapper Cena and TV14 Attitude era, but wouldn't TV14 overuse cussing and blood? I think they should stay PG but still let the wrestlers say what they. Kinda like mature PG.
jaguar94able 4 months ago
@REDRAPIST I prefer TV-14 because wrestlers will have more freedom to say or do what they want. At the same time, there's so much that can b done with PG despite the limitations. PG or not, as a fan I could do away with too much blood or overly sexual content. When The Rock returned, I realized PG wasn't the problem. From 2009-2010, I was so fed up with their programming that I quickly blamed the rating but now I understand good writing and character development will triumph over everything.
Mr1131988 4 months ago
@Mr1131988 I totally agree with most of your points but I think saying the segments and other content is childish is kinda false, mostly because sure they don't cuss but they certainly don't have promos where the argue like children.
WCWnumba1 3 months ago
@WCWnumba1 Good point. It's not the lack cussing that makes it childish 2 me. What made PG corny 2 me before Rock, Austin and Punk started using foul language this year was all the campy segments with Hornswoggle, D-X, John Cena and all the dumb guest hosts. I know WWE can b comedic once in a while but drop the dumb jokes. Even some G-rated comedies r funnier than that. Santino Marrella may portray an Italian stereotype but at least his jokes r witty.
Mr1131988 3 months ago
Comment removed
REDRAPIST 4 months ago
yep thats why i stopped watching
What was the last time you saw someone from the PG era say ASS BITCH DAMN b4 The Rock came back that NEVER! heppend
Ive NEVER seen that for 7 YEARS
no 1 ever dimensioned the Attitude but The Rock
and when you said We have seen Blood in the PG era thats BULLSHIT seeing someones noise Bleed ain't shit for Example: the other week on Smackdown Cody Rhodes was Bleeding and all the cosmetics had to Hide it Before all the little bitches get a seizure.
FUCK WWE =)
lobbyhobbybobbydubob 4 months ago 21
@lobbyhobbybobbydubob Dude they say ass bitch and damn and hell in pg era
WWERandomvideos15 4 months ago
Well no offence but you kinda insulted me..... :/ I want chair shots and tlc matches and street fights but i want them in WWE not freakin TNA....I Guess my opinion doesnt fucking matter.....
TheMattharrington123 5 months ago
I agree 100 percent, Sean. Current WWE is like a PS3: It has something for everyone! It's not what it used to be, but I still enjoy it, and will keep enjoying it. And people, PG isn't and era, it's a TV rating. I don't think this era has a name yet. WWE Universe era, perhaps? I know, it sounds kind of ridiculous.
ale7xtreme1001 5 months ago
i think the might need a another bigger show or make superstars BIG! cause if they get some main eventers they will get more viewers. its borring seeing yoshi totsu(whos time is upp and needs to goo) wrestle tyler recks. its annoying. push em or put on raw or smackdowrn or release em. thats what i dont get. and make alex riley a bigger star
JAREDCHAMP 5 months ago
Many of these people know absolutely nothing about TV rating system, WWE's use or it, and their history of using it. I'll admit, I hated the PG rating before I did any kind of research, because I was part of that typical IWC bandwagon. Now, after doing research on this stuff, I gained so much logic and realized what the problems are.
Also, PG IS A TV RATING, NOT AN ERA. Eras have always been named after what was advertaised, since Rock N Wrestling. Therefore, 2008-2011 was The Universe Era.
AJ36sXe 5 months ago
@AJ36sXe You are mostly right, except eras are known by more than advertising. The 1980's are called an era based on the time frame (though the 1980's era actually extended to 1994 when the New Generation began). Rock And Wrestling was only 1983-1985, not the whole 1980's era. People in the industry call this the PG era, so I have no problem saying it. What is dumb is smarks ignore the DEBACLE Ruthless Aggression era and pretend WWF went right from Attitude to PG for no reason at all.
MRobert21 5 months ago
21 dumbfucks stil cant realize that
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
i like the PG ERA haha
LynnLeapord 5 months ago
@LynnLeapord Good for you, I like the PG era too. The most fun thing about liking the PG era is being hated on by all the mutant web smarks (who all watch the PG stuff just to whine and piss about it). The talent now is way beyond the losers McMahon had a few years ago. No more WCW / ECW wash out losers like Steroid Steiner, Goldturd, RVD, Tommy Dreamer, etc. All the young flops like Booby Lashley, Rob Conway, Mohammed Hassan, Chris Masters, etc. are gone too. The roster now is way better.
MRobert21 5 months ago
PG era 2008-now John Cena, Randy Orton, Christian, Alberto Del Rio CM punk etc
crap storyline, but cm punk gets it a lil better.
iseebwoii 5 months ago
Man 4get about the PG era.......now we are in the New Altitude ERAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!! and i heard there gonna be something new very soon...i cant say anything yet its a secret....WWE is coming to a new start/...one clue is their channel coming in 2012....more clues would come......... .....
GeekedUpShaqyRocks 5 months ago
@GeekedUpShaqyRocks Do you know why WWE had the Attitude Era to begin with? If you do then you would realize, why there will never be one again...
AJ36sXe 5 months ago
@GeekedUpShaqyRocks You are 100% full of crap and are making stuff up. For 1 thing, Linda McMahon is running for Senate again in 2012, so Vince McMahon is not going to do anything that would tarnish or scandalize her, though Linda quit WWF many years ago. Second, McMahon has many long term deals signed with major companies, such as Mattel, Pepsi, 7-11, et cetera, which REQUIRE McMahon to maintain the PG rating. The corporate web site says right on it the company is dedicated to PG entertainment
MRobert21 5 months ago
the point is that there are diffrent wrestlers at certain times to entertain people.
Golden Era 1990-1997 Vader, HBK, Bret Hart, Hulk Hogan Undertaker Doink etc
they had little or no storylines then but they put great matches then
Pre Attitude era (near to attitude) 1997-1999 Bret hart, Stone Cold, Kane, Undertaker, Ken Shamrok Debut of the rock etc
the mic skills were awesome, and a hell lot of cursing.
ATTITUDE- Stone cold, the rock, kurt angle, triple h etc
cursing, blood sex etc
iseebwoii 5 months ago 3
@iseebwoii Where do you make up these fake era names? 1990 - 1997 was NOT a Golden era as the entire wrestling industry was on its butt and almost totally died. What is commonly called the Golden era by wrestling fans and those in the business is the 1950's when television made wrestling first explode. 1997 - 2001 is the Attitude Era. There was no pre Attitude era as the era before Attitude was called New Generation. You really think Doink, Vader, and Shamrock were huge, entertaining, stars?
MRobert21 5 months ago
yeah seans damn right............before in the golden era hulk hogan, ric flair bret hart, shawn michaels, vader, mankind etc they made the show great back in the early 1990's then in the mid 90s WCW competed with WWF and beated them.
then vince mcmahon used his brain and started the attitude era with guys like stone cold , the rock, undertaker as a ministry/biker kane kurt angle etc. they introduced more bloodshed. hot divas etc. THEN came PG era with john cena and his babyface crew.
iseebwoii 5 months ago
@iseebwoii This is ridiculously stupid, but common on the smark and dirt sheet nonsense on the web. The Attitude era DID NOT lead directly to the current PG era. Smarks and dirt sheets ignore the SUPER FAILED Ruthless Aggression era from when Attitude was finally declared dead in 2002 until PG started in 2008. At first during Ruthless Aggression blood, smut, violence, and all the smark loved crap was ramped up, whixch led to financial disaster in 2003. From 2004-2008 content was made cleaner
MRobert21 5 months ago
ok i can agree with u sean,but the PG Era still sucks
DropKickFilmz 5 months ago
i mean some blood everyone once in awhile isnt too much to ask...calm down douche
mcsweeney24 5 months ago
@mcsweeney24 Yes, it is too much to ask. I do not see you or any of the other blood crazed smarks tearing your heads open with razors like you want wrestlers to do. No need to risk disease transmission, staph infections, and other health risks to appease a few mutant smarks. There will always be accidents where guys get busted open, but blade jobs are gone for good. As Bret Hart said, you are not fooling any body any more with blade jobs, so there is no place for them in modern wrestling.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 valid point...but as for me and my friends tearing my head open...im not getting paid and ive been told to NOT TRY THIS AT HOME so i mean i leave it to the professionals but its not like i want guys bleeding every Monday but i dont think its too much to ask for a little bit of ''realness'
mcsweeney24 5 months ago
@mcsweeney24 You want "realness" (though most of the world besides you know wrestling is 100% FAKE). What "real" sport or entertainment form do performers slice themselves open with razors in? NONE. In "real" sports or entertainment when there is an injury involving blood, action is stopped and the injury is immediately addressed, just like in McMahon's company now at days. I knew you would come up with a CHICKEN reason to not injure yourself like you stupidly demand these people to do.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 believe me dude....if i was being paid to razor myself id have no problem with it...there would be no need for blood if i could be more intrigued by storylines as the storylines of today SUCK
mcsweeney24 5 months ago
@mcsweeney24 I shall now ignore you as my work on you is done on this video here after this final comment since you have given up your lame attempts at trying to defend your mutant blood lust and are now just in generic web smark "story lines suck" mode. You EPIC FAILED to demonstrate any reason sports entertainers should slice themselves open for your perverse amusement. No, I do not believe you since you are like all the other web smarks who live vicariously through others bleeding and hurting
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 if the storylines of today were good then there would be no reason for me to be in need for blood!!!!
mcsweeney24 5 months ago
We give our opinion , and he calls us stupid
hearthagram 5 months ago
Also they need the cruiserweight belts back . that was my favourite part of the wcw, and its the best part of tna to have the x division. I didnt agree with your slating of tna, the problem with tna is hogan. I do like how HHH has put alot more into tag teams but now it seems theres an overload of tag team matches. lets get some gregory helmes vs billy kidman or something. Evan bourne vs justin gabriel
lordjoesnow 5 months ago
what it needs is prolonged storylines. The nwo span on for years and years. Michael cole being an ass was a great story line but then it just ended one day and now he and Lawler are buddies again.
I agree with making the intercontinetal and us belts bigger! I like dolph ziggler and cody rhodes as champions but they need more of a push than facing randy orton for rhodes' example. Because once randy orton wins that match it makes the intercontinental belt meaningless!
lordjoesnow 5 months ago
hey sean u kno anything about the real sincara face off wit fake sincara
tmoney6936 5 months ago
you say that the pg is not the problem. You say if you want blood and violence watch tna, and tna is not getting great ratings. Just to tell you that in the 90's there was ecw that was like tna and wwe was pg those days. then wwe turned the product up side down to tv-14 and it did it's best ratings ever. so what you said doesn;t make that lot of sense when it comes to, " if you want violence watch tna, tna is not successful" . Thanks. Love to listen to your episodes.
NEWGENERATIONv1 5 months ago
@NEWGENERATIONv1 In the darkest days of WCW and WWF in the 1990's, they were always making way more $ being PG than ECW did with its smut, violence, and trash. Even after ECW toned down when ECW got on pay per view and national cable television, it still never made $. That is not even counting what super business disasters ultra trash companies like CZW, XPW, and IWA - MS have been. If people wanted TV14 crap, people would watch TNA, which nobody does watch because nobody wants that garbage.
MRobert21 5 months ago
the wwe was at it's best back in the early to mid 90s, it's been getting worse and worse since the late 90's, there needs to be more feuds like there used to be, and I miss when all the wrestlers were on Raw and Smackdown didn't exist.
MrDCfan93 5 months ago
@MrDCfan93 Really, you think WWF was at its best early to mid 1990's when nobody was watching the show and WWF lost so much $ that it almost closed for good. I quit watching WWF totally from 1994-1998 because it stunk so bad. WWF today is way better financially and creatively than it was during most of the 1990's. The over all talent roster is way younger and deeper than it was then. WWF has always had secondary shows, they just used to not be as popular and profitable as Smackdown is now.
MRobert21 5 months ago
Pg is the reason why wwe is failing
Trolololololololololol
reyjed619 5 months ago
@reyjed619 Really, Vince McMahon's company is failing huh? I guess that is why The WWF has made a profit despite a GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEPRESSION every fiscal quarter of every year since 2004. I guess that is why JP Morgan Chase Bank just gave Vince McMahon a $200 million loan to expand his business with his new television network and increased digital content. Major banks often like to give hundreds of millions of $ to failing businesses, so the banks themselves will not get the $ back and fail.
MRobert21 5 months ago
they show favoritism now? what about rock, stone cold, hhh, taker... they were the cena/orton of the attitude era
the same main events over and over? how many times did we see austin vs rock? austin vs mcmahon?
lack of star power? orton, cena, christian, sheamus, triple h, cm punk, mysterio, daniel bryan...
make the ic/us titles relevent? thats what rhodes is doing
and your idea about moving raw to tuesday... simply idiotic
lennylynk 5 months ago
yes, but the childish shit is stupid.
roryfitzpatric 5 months ago in playlist More videos from SVETV988
Comment removed
Jonster13ify 5 months ago
well at least we know how you feel about TNA now
curthaynes 5 months ago
I agree with you that they need to make fewer but better matches on RAW but they are stating to do that with Some midcarders. The JoMo vs ADR was a good match. I say WWE needs to make SD! better.
Chthonian121 5 months ago
I agree with Sean 110%
ALCEDO31 5 months ago
55th coment
cenexus15 5 months ago
Why do people care about PG? You're still watching it so STFU
RonnShad 5 months ago in playlist More videos from SVETV988
@RonnShad It is because smarks love to piss and moan. They watched and pissed and moaned just the same when it was TV14. If McMahon went TV-MA tomorrow, they would piss and moan just the same. This is why McMahon usually wisely ignores the smarks, Smarks get off whining and crying and acting like know it all experts when they know NOTHING whether the rating is TV-Y or TV-MA. Just have a laugh at the smarks and take them with a grain if salt as I do. Their complaining is just humorous.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 True that. No one will get them to change their mind except them. Even if theres 3,000,000 people signed on a petition.
RonnShad 5 months ago
@RonnShad $ talks and bull crap walks as the saying goes. Petitions mean nothing. If the smarks want PG gone then all they have to do is collect their pennies and pay McMahon the few hundred million $ he would lose in advertising, investors, sponsorships, and rights fees to replace PG. Instead, the smarks just piss and moan and sign their worthless petitions online nobody cares about. When the smarks make over a BILLION $ at wrestling like McMahon has, then I will listen to them over him.
MRobert21 5 months ago
Why do people care about PG? You're still watching it so STFU
RonnShad 5 months ago in playlist More videos from SVETV988
the pg of this era isnt the problem, the brand expansion is the problem you mentioned making the intercontinental and u.s. title relevant that can never happen as long as there are 2 world champions
truechamp57 5 months ago
@truechamp57 Look PG Sucks and it will always suck Attitude Rules so are you Cenas biggest fan go and cry like a baby
MrFreddykreuger11 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
better yet moved it to thursday nights and have both raw and smackdown live.
SuperMetsfan11 5 months ago
Better yet move it to Thursdays nights. and make both raw and smackdown live.
SuperMetsfan11 5 months ago
Wow Sean, you can take what everybody else says and pretend it's yours. Good job.
jozrok 5 months ago
ummm chair shots to the head werent banned because of PG.
its because wwe want to be more careful about their wrestlers
UnifiedaxxS 5 months ago 6
@UnifiedaxxS You are 100% right. Smarks blame everything on PG, but most changes have nothing to do with PG. Chair shots and lots of mover were banned as part of safe style to prevent concussions and neck injuries, such as what retired Edge and Austin. Blading was banned to prevent disease transmission and staph infections. All of this is a part of the Wellness Policy to make wrestlers healthier and I am all for it. Smarks can watch TNA and indie crap if they want to see that type of junk.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRBOBTHEROB1TV You are 100% right. I was skeptical of the current PG Era when it started in 2008, but it has been really good. It is not terrible as WWF was when it was PG and lousy from 1992-1997. WWF is WAY better now than it was in the Ruthless Aggression crap Era from 2002-2007. I was watching some old crap shows from back then and if PG means I never have to see Al Wilson, Katie Vick or Doctor Heiny again to name a few old crap angles, then I am 100% for PG lasting forever.
MRobert21 5 months ago
I'm 20 years old and I don't have a problem with the PG Era. Well ya, I miss the Attitude Era.
Jonster13ify 5 months ago
@Jonster13ify I am 34 years old and I love the PG Era. When I was 20 years old I loved the Attitude Era, but then I grew up. That is what happened to the Attitude Era was all us Attitude Era fans grew up (except for a few socially retarded web smarks) and they quit watching the smut and trash. It was time to move to a family and kid centered product to build a new audience (actually McMahon should have gone PG 5 years before he did). The WWF I grew up on was PG in the 1980's, so PG is good.
MRobert21 5 months ago
thats dman right, pg is not the problem, only attitude crazy addicts say that
AwesomeOne513 5 months ago
@AwesomeOne513 It is just smarks being smarks, so ignore them. Before McMahon went PG in 2008, they all still pissed and moaned about the show. The smarks pissed and moaned about all the trashy crap like exploding limos, humping corpses, lesbian plots, et cetera, so McMahon eliminated all that garbage and the smarks still complain. PG draws $ period. PG has drawn more sponsors, advertisers, investors, rights fees, and other $, which is why it is here to stay no matter who hates on it.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 Agree with everything man nothing but the truth
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
@TheDieHardWWEAddict Thank you very much. Near 4 years of smarks pissing and whining about PG. As Randy Orton has said, if they do not like it, then please stop watching. When I did not like wrestling in the past, I just quit watching for a while, I did not piss and moan about it all the time. All I care about is that the company makes $ and stays in business entertaining me whether it is rated G or XXX. 2003 when the company was trashiest was when WWF last lost $ before it changed.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 Very true ive accepted the pg rating and the attitude era being over
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
@TheDieHardWWEAddict I accepted it and I like it. I hated feeling dirty when watching crap like Doctor Heiny and Vince blowing himself up and now I do not need to feel that way any more. The PLANET is in a GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEPRESSION. Considering companies are going out of business all over the place, I think Vince McMahon is doing just fine. They sold out Summerslam for over a million $ live gate alone and have done the same already for Survivor Series. Not too bad in my opinion.
MRobert21 5 months ago
The WWE needs better Writers... FINALLY SOMEONE WHO AGREES WITH ME! Hence one reason I started SWS, although I think WWE is watching and copying my ideas. Think about it, Kanes Heel turn in '08? The appearance of Nikki Bella in '08 after Brie Bellas debut? CM Punk ruining Rey's Daughters birthday before Mania 26? Similar stuff happened in my videos before those. Coincidence? But still, a lot of the storylines in WWE are a little stale and repetitive.
Swordsmasterguy 5 months ago
Man they need that unpredictible element in wrestling. your video is kinda meaninless this time when you think of a star like Stone cold steve Austin .
wachtower100 5 months ago
You want to push young talent, but the older guys still draw a crowd, so totally getting rid of them is not an option.
1960Carolynn 5 months ago
haha It was funny how you accidentally said that the PG rating was "Drugging" the WWE down at 0:26!
Weezing336 5 months ago
Despite the PG rating, WWE still does well enough with or without it. It can be debated that the PG rating strayed away loyal fans or if it attracted more fans, I really don't know which is more true. I'd like it if they didn't have the PG rating, but who am I to complain? If it works for them, keep it. If they really wanted to, don't you think they would have went Y7 by now if they wanted to please kids that much?
respectthekick07 5 months ago
forget about Cena's spot isnt changing anytime soon Danielson
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
Yes the PG Era isn't killing WWE but I still hate it! TNA's ratings aren't low because of blood and chair shots to the head! It's LOW BECAUSE TNA IS UN-INTERESTING AND STUPID! Blood and Chair Shots have nothing to do with it! It's just because TNA sucks! I don't need blood and chair shots to the head! WWE is just boring to me. There writing and their booking sucks! That's why I don't like WWE! But TNA is still worst no matter what!
ahmadhbk 5 months ago
They really do need to allow other stars to shine & a good way to do that is to take John Cena out of every single main event & allow other guys to build up their Star power. John Cena has got to start putting other talent over clean & I really do believe a Cena Heel turn would only do good for the business as it would open the door for Cena's fans to find a new hero & stop making everything about Cena.
Danielson184 5 months ago
The Smarks and attitude era marks suck
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
@TheDieHardWWEAddict I would say that is generally true. Attitude Era smarks are just silly. It is gone and not coming back. What is stupid is all the Attitude Era stuff is on the web and video, so if people like that, then just watch it. People can watch TNA and all the other trash indie companies that do blood, smut, potty mouthing, and other crap if they need to see it. There is no need to piss and moan about current PG if people want to live in the past. Times always change.
MRobert21 5 months ago
you are kinda late Sean :)
BrianRichterTV 5 months ago
right now wwe is being good right now i can see the tag team division making a come back evan bourne and kofi are great together but their name sucks lol and R truth and the miz is gold right now
GeneralMyke74 5 months ago
I thumbed this video up for addressing the attitude era smarks at the beginning of this vid. Those guys apparently don't seem to realize WWE (or rather WWF at the time) was TV-PG for years (decades even) and they continued to be a successful company.
ststriker 5 months ago
No shit its not people need to fucking realize that
TheDieHardWWEAddict 5 months ago
PG era is fucking finished, The Reality era has begun
Fondrom 5 months ago
your right its not the problem. Bad booking and lack of star power is the problem
DML960 5 months ago
I agree. I don't think PG is the problem at all. It is just a rating at the top of the tv screen. It doesn't mean jack. I wish some of the stubborn people in the IWC would get that through their heads.
NightRanger71379 5 months ago
@NightRanger71379 You are 100% right, but you are wasting your time trying to be rational and reasonable with the smarks because they enjoy pissing, moaning, and acting like know it alls no matter what the rating is. Fact is WWF started toning way down in 2004 4 years before the official move to PG in 2004 because 2003 with smut, violence, and trash was a financial disaster, As HHH said recently, people used to say ass 100 times a show and nobody cared, now somebody says ass once and it is big
MRobert21 5 months ago
Bring the World Tag Team Titles Let The Us And Intercontinental Championship have its prestige. Younger Talent or make a new brand for people that dont get oppurtunities
LuiiVKid10 5 months ago
@LuiiVKid10
They already made a new brand for peole who dont get opportunities, Superstars, no one watches it lol.
There making the IC title prestige against and US.
Fondrom 5 months ago
Triple H in the attitude era was the same as Cena and Orton today. HHH was always champ and always in the title picture.
So often was Stone Cold, The Rock, Undertaker and Kurt Angle.
The theme has been going on for decades, but if you can't see it, that means you just really hate todays WWE and it is time to give it up and move on in life, cos the WWE sure has.
smilerboyboy 5 months ago
PG Era is fine. It makes money, we are the has been audience, we aren't where the money is.
The kids of today are. The WWE broke away from the 80s, and focused on the kids of the 90s, people like me. So it is normal for them to now focus on the kids of today, get the fuck over it people.
p.s Blood means nout tbh. It is pointless.
smilerboyboy 5 months ago
pg era is not the problem at all...... i am enjoying the pg era right now its good!
xfinisherx123 5 months ago
I think if they get better writers and push younger talent and get a divas division all the other problems would basically fix them selves
SuperMarkmoney 5 months ago
@SuperMarkmoney Agree With u 100 % Another thing is stop making cena winning all the time or have the wwe title
LuiiVKid10 5 months ago
Nice video but R truth is 39 years old
TheVeljko97 5 months ago
Nice video but R-truth is 40 years old
TheVeljko97 5 months ago
The PG rating restricts story lines they can use and what we can see and hear, the PG rating is absolutely the problem
Freshyy05 5 months ago
the problem with wwe is the fact that they flash too much of the same superstars instead of giving everybody a chance don't get me wrong I've been a fan of cena since he started but even i need a break from you can't see me
TheBigGman101 5 months ago
Great vid, I'll be making one myself on the same situation
kyle9965 5 months ago
I liked the attitude era more than the PG era becuae of the better storylines and legends that were in the WWE at the time. nothing else.
marcho12287 5 months ago
PG is not its JOHN "sucka" CENA
tnavswwe52 5 months ago
WWe has been doing PG13 stuff since the rock came back.
I remember WWE was PG in the attitude era for a couple years when its first began.
kinglarry12 5 months ago
@kinglarry12 WRONG, EVERYTHING on McMahon produced television shows is PG. If it was not PG, the government could fine and jail McMahon for putting a false rating on the shows as well as pull the shows and the networks off the air. Read the corporate web site and the company mission statement clearly says it is to provide PG programming. Smarks just like to pretend the stuff they like is not PG while the stuff they hate is PG. WWF was PG from 1983-1996, then resumed PG in 2008.
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 Kid go watch a raw is war from 1998 and tell me you dont see a PG logo pop up
kinglarry12 5 months ago
@kinglarry12 I do not know why you are typing this at me KID, but WWF programming during most of the Attitude Era and all of the Ruthless Aggression trash era was TV14 (this is according to American content ratings) before McMahon wisely changed to PG. I do not know if some foreign country used a different rating or edited something to be PG on an international WWF broadcast. There is very little difference between PG and TV14. TV-Y, TV-Y7, TV-Y7-FV, and TV-G are all lower ratings for kids .
MRobert21 5 months ago
@MRobert21 It says PG right here at the start of the show watch?v=KB0jMor5s4A
kinglarry12 5 months ago
the PG ERA SUCKS!
humankiller99 5 months ago 16
@humankiller99 WWE was PG before the Attitude Era as well...
btw who cares if it's PG? We have some amazing story lines going on at the moment, and nothing worth complaining about.
btw, do you like Edge? Because even he admits that he's glad chair shots to the head, is gone, because of the amount of concussions he's suffered...
We get some bad language, but if everyone used them all the time, It wouldn't be unique, and it would just defeat the point...
We still have great moments...
ThePrototype27602 5 months ago
@humankiller99 fuck u
cenexus15 5 months ago
@cenexus15 sorry im taken.. ;)
humankiller99 5 months ago
@humankiller99 Ya you tell him PG Sucks Attitude Rules screw that guy SVETV988 AKA Sean for loving PG if The Rock Beats John Cena at Wrestlemania i would be very happy because The Rock is definitly Better than Cena thumbs up also if you want Stone Cold to host Wrestlemania this year and WWE TO go back to TV 14 Sorry Sean me and humankiller99 also hate PG Go and cry yourself to sleep with Cena posters in your room.
MrFreddykreuger11 1 day ago
WWE biggest problem is they do need to bring in the yonger talent but also they need some old wresler to have one last match like nash and undertaker
TheBoBStation 5 months ago
Thank you. Thank you Seans View Entertainment for stating something that we already know.
ExtremeRulez13 5 months ago 20
@ExtremeRulez13 actually alot of dumbasses dont know this
UnifiedaxxS 5 months ago
@UnifiedaxxS There's a reason for that; they're dumbasses
ExtremeRulez13 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
really, really, really?
TheJojoso 5 months ago