This is just water electrolysis... the reason why it burns is because the water molecules split, releasing Oxygen and Hydrogen (Hydrogen is EXTREMELY flammable). Once you light the stream of Hydrogen coming out, well...
Also the reason why the saltwater part is significant is that electrolysis (the splitting of a water molecule using electricity) of water is only efficient with large amounts of salt in the water.
I wonder what Radio Frequency he was using?? Also how much RF Power was he using for the Test?? I know you can light up a Florescent Light under some High Voltage Power lines, that is at extremely low Frequency... Anyway, I think it’s a really cool experiment.. I give him an A+ for his invention!!!
@AviatorGuy About 14 Mhz. Actually RF is one of many Ionization energies. If you google RF Ion energy source this is similar, but used with gas based ions. Solution based ions are more stable. This isn't just restricted to salt water. The ion types such a chlorine may provide better results than sodium.
This is a better way to extract HHO than with electrolysis. With this, i think a car running only on water is more than possible. Japaneese company Genepax said thay made a prototype
This is great! You only have to have a high power electromagnetic transmitter and a big extension cord to run it and you too disassociate enough hydrogen to make a little-bitty flame. Of course, you have to keep the engine in the tiny little space next to the transmitter where it has enough power density to light up a florescent light bulb.
The energy required to cause electrolysis of the salt water (i.e. generating hydrogen, and, technically, oxygen) requires more energy then that which will be available for use once the gas(es) are produced. It is a grossly inefficient system because you must have much more energy going into the system then it will generate. It cannot sustain itself. There are no gains here, just a series of very massive loss after loss.
@MrIHADANACCOUNT I agree, this sounds like another meens of producing HHO but at an extremly high loss factor. unless they can produce this radio frequency with a minature unit and a car battery I dont see this having any effect of anything. conventional electrolosis is more effiecient than this.
@MrIHADANACCOUNT It is very obvious you are not a scientist and are just talking out of your ass! Is some corpuration putting you up to it to be a nay sayer? If you Build one feel free to explain it and how it works, until then keep you disinformation to yourself and Shut the Fuck UP!
cancer has already a cure. it's been suppressed and i wouldn't doubt it if some corp. comes along and suppresses this technology as well to protect the oil companies. This man could very well end up dead if he isn't very careful.
Haha! Hes using electricity to power a machine that burns the salt water which runs the steam engine... Why not just power the motor directly with the electricity?
@Otherworld314 I am no scientist, and see the point you make however, when I think about it, lets say this took off (which it hasnt obviously ) you could use a tiny amount of coal to power the radio emitter, which then initiates the combustion of the salt water... then the salt water would continue to power the radio emitter, whilst more saltwater is combusted to produce more energy for your needs... so it would become an endless cycle of abundant, and clean energy... I think, its a cool idea
they use RF in the new sulphur plasma lighting technologies. You get about the same amount of lumens as a 600w HID for only half the wattage. So I would imagine that it wouldn't cost too much energy in RF radiation as one would think, derp
The question is, does it consume more or less energy then it uses to create the effect. Unless it produces more energy then it uses to produce the radio waves it's just a fancy parlor trick.
Considering it takes energy to generate the radio waves to separate the hydrogen in this process it's not really a viable solution for are growing energy crisis. But its medical applications look very promising. Can I invest with you? I really believe the medical applications from this technology will be a game changer in the cancer treatment . I'm really interested to see where this will all go in a few years.
@tampabayismyhome If you use an external energy to seperate enough hydrogen once you can then used the result of this as fuel for more seperation. It really is an amazing solution.
It's just one little problem.. how much energy does that radio frequency generator use? about equivalent to the amount of energy you get from burning the saltwater (hydrogen gas) maybe?
@pelkas87 it doesn't matter, the efficiency is always higher than 1. You just give an initial input of energy with the radio waves and water starts to burn, just imagine a pool of gasoline is the water and a lighter radio waves.
@sickjedi3 I understand your comparison, but the difference is that the process needs a continuous "stream" of strong radiowaves to maintain the saltwater burning. So, in theory, the salt is involved in some sort of chemical reaction to release the energy stored in the water.. but what is left after the reaction? i'm just wondering about the chemical substances involved here, and by that make a calculation of how much energy you could actually gain from the process.. if any.
@pelkas87 Just thought of another thing.. the only molecule that can be made from the atoms involved that can burn with a flame like that, is hydrogen gas, and extracting hydrogen gas from water is normally a VERY energy demanding process (in which you actually lose some energy in the long run).
@paulgw3 No shit the energy is heat.. tell me something i don't know.
But that heat has an equivalent energy (almost) to that which is consumed by the radio frequency generator.
Your answer does not explain why and how the process can produce more energy than it consumes..
You have to give some scientific explanation of this specific process which proves your statement.. it's just that nobody can, because there is no such thing as gaining energy from water.
@pelkas87 ok... and your point is what exactly? The HEAT is still the factor here. I'm sure you can come up with a few creative ways to use HEAT I'm sure.. It doesn't take a scientist to figure this one out. What runs the combustion of your car?? What keeps you warm in the winter? Do I need to continue? And the process of this can be achieved by other means than this equation, but I'm going to assume you haven't gotten that far this semester yet.
@paulgw3 It's pretty clear that you do not know what you're talking about.
Your point is, if i've got this right, that you get energy from this process like you do when for example gasoline is combusted in a piston engine?
Gasoline is a carbohydrate (a molecule that contains mostly carbon and hydrogen atoms), a NON OXIDATED molecule. a substance which contains high energy value, that we extract from raw oil. It's an easily ignited fluid that can give heat and/or pressure energy while burning.
@paulgw3 BUT in the case with water, a molecule which contains one oxygen and 2 hydrogen atoms, (which is an OXIDATED molecule), it takes an equivalent amount of energy to SEPARATE the atoms to extract the hydrogen gas (H2), which is the "fuel" in the process, that the process itself can produce. This process is, of course, the hydrogen oxidates (burns) to convert back to water. If you understand the basics of chemistry and physics, you would know exactly what i'm talking about.
@paulgw3 And if you don't understand the basics, this is one of the most fundamental rules: Energy can not be created or destroyed, it can only change form
@paulgw3 So, in gasoline, there is STORED energy, which we use when we take a drive in our cars, while in water, you DO NOT have stored energy. Does that answer make it easier for you?
@pelkas87 everything is energy, some useful some only not as useful yet because we have no idea how to use it. FIRE and HEAT is usable energy that can be transferred from one object to another... This is like trying to explain something to a dog. Thy're interested, but just don't seem to get it.
@paulgw3 Yes there's different kinds of energy, that can be used in different ways, but it's still the same AMOUNT of energy, no matter what state it's in.
I wonder who's the dog in this conversation.. or cockroach more like it.
@pelkas87 do have any idea how much energy is in 1500c heat? Do have any clue how many application that energy can be transferred too which consumes less than what has been created? Use your head here buddy, you are making yourself look like an idiot. Seriously! Everyone else seems to get it but you for what ever reason. I’m assuming that’s how your life typically is in general at this point.
@paulgw3 Everyone else but me? i guess you haven't read any of the other comments on this video, but if you do, and there still is some braincells in that pothead of yours, you might get a clue of who's the idiot.
I'm making points that has scientific foundation, and you're just rambling about "so much energy in 1500c heat" xD give me a break.
Now i want you to explain in detail how you reasoned while you "figured out" that you could create energy by this process.. i'm waiting.....
@paulgw3 And please, in contrary to all of your other dumb ass comments, just TRY to put in some scientific foundation in your answer, or we would have to determine you as a real lowlife moron who actually thinks he's got a clue.
Now i'm gonna give you a quote for you to reflect on; "Arguing with idiots who has no scientific knowledge or insight, is like arguing with religious people;
proof has no value, only their own opinion does, no matter how absurd".
@pelkas87 hey idiot.. are you going to answer any of my questions, or are you going to try to argue your way into trying to make me look like you? I have asked you 5-6 questions and yet you seem to have ignored the entire basis for this discussion. You are a child, and nothing more. Go away... Loser, and get a job!
@paulgw3 Really? i'd say it's the other way around... the only thing i've done is explaining to you why you're wrong. @paulgw3; The wheel spins, but the hamster is dead, get it? guess not.
PS: I've got a job, a really fucking good one, but i suppose you're either stuck in some shitty factory or just unemployed living off the tax payers like fucking leach
@pelkas87 LMAO JUSt watch the videos below and they'll explain what you obviously cant come up with on your on.. you tool. Critical thinking is a great attribute, and soo sad when others have no ability to do so.
@paulgw3 BTW in your ranting, you have YET to answer any of my quastions.. proving me to be yet again CORRECT!! LMAO You are seriously dumber than you make yourself out to be.
@paulgw3 And what happens when the water "burns" is that it's transforming back to water - which gives exactly the same amount of energy as you needed to put in to separate the atoms in the first place, unless you add energy in the process.. but then you go +-0 anyway.
And if you failed pedants want to quibble whattayasay you check out "Orbo" technology by Steorn. That should give you all kinds of things to quack about.
@1mkwalker Oh yeah? Have you heard anything new about this "revolutionary" technology lately? All i've heard is that a test jury of independent scientists in this specific area has established that you can not get a net energy output by using the orbo technology.... do you even know how it presumably works, or did you just happen to trip over it while roaming the internet and decided it was the truth?
@dirkjardiggler Make him dissapear. After millions of people have seen the "invention." After everyone knows how it works. Setting aside the fact that this 'invention' isn't worth stealing, they would have to make everyone that watched this video dissapear... and everyone who found a way to download it, because this video shows you everything you need to know about how to recreate it.
@SittingOnEdgeman ..And considering this, why would'nt someone by now have created a device that would work, in incontrary to steorns joke of invention?
John Kanzius is an American hero. He had almost found a cure to cancer, meanwhile accidentally creating an alternative fuel source. It is a shame we lost him almost 2 years ago to the day.
Interesting how nobody in the video says how much energy was required by the machine to burn the fuel. If it was less, then they could use the saltwater energy to fuel the machine to burn more saltwater, thus creating a cycle of INFINITE ENERGY.
Oh wait, shit doesn't work that way...
Big oil didn't stop this, and neither did the government. It was just a stupid idea to begin with. I can't believe this garbage actually passes for journalism.
@redherrings SURE, he didn't find infinite energy. But that wasn't the goal of Kanziuses Research. What you may not have known is that machine that Kanzius was developing was the cutting edge in research for the cure to cancer. His research was critically acclaimed by many institutions as the most viable method to cure cancer.
Unfortunately Kanzius left us too soon. He died February of 2009 from Pneumonia.
@redherrings And please, also note that not even a month after his salt water discovery, Kanzius openly admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas.
it's hilarious how many people in these comments think this guy was onto something and "the man" held him down. you must believe in chemtrails too.
salt water isn't a fuel here, it's a medium being acted on by a large wave generating machine powered by electricity. why would you use that energy to make a flame to run a steam engine when you could have just used the electricity to power an electric motor? it's like putting a glass of water in the microwave, nothing more.
@JJJJZ It's been a couple years since I saw this video and I don't have sound on my computer right now but:
In the video didn't they say that once ignited, the salt water will just continue "burning" without any need for external energy? In which case, we'd be using the chemical energy of the salt water as energy, not electricity like you said. So how do you explain that
@garycalgary If we do want our civilisations to have a decent future here on Earth, the best thing would be to forbid inbred idiots like you to have kids, by which means you would spread your diseased DNA and thereby reverse the human genetic evolution.
Wow, even the reporter was taken by this crap. "The only fuel is salt water." Uh, no. It seems pretty clear that the energy is coming from the RF field that he's bombarding the salt water with. It's not free energy.
That said, it's still a really interesting invention he's got there. I had no idea that you could split water with an RF field. Does he ever say the specifics of the field he is generating? Wavelength and power density, anything?
More energy is required than what is released by the burning hydrogen. Similar to electrolysis of water, might even be cheaper, though electrical motors are more efficient anyway.
Funny he is looking for cure for cancer when there is a cure. Its in whole organic raw foods, good health, hemp oil and more.
Why not keep this technology for the masses and not sell it to big oil. This would eliminate many causes to today's unsustainable practices which in turn would eliminate many stress causing environments for the whole planet.
This is the same story of the man who built a battery what would take a car 300 miler per charge. Patent sold to Chevron. Sick world.
Nothing more disheartening than realizing BP YouTube Channel is a Suggestion to viewers of this video. lol... fuck my life right? Wonder if the masses will always get fucked over by the wealthy or if it will ever change =/
SO he just built a homemade radio wave generator before he did this big version.. How hard can that be with pie pans = aluminum which reflects radio waves, sorta like how lasers works reflecting light energy between 2 mirrors and amplifying it, or concentrating the waves parabolicly.. he mentioned that he made radio wave generator after the kind of kit they sold when he was young, on another video.
so why not just add variable tuning capacitor to find the sweet spot?
huge machine, tiny motor...... I'll have to see some numbers instead of a journalist's hype. You think you can cure cancer? I'll give you my money. You think you need to come up with a "free energy source" to get a new grant? I'll pass
Nobody bought this an hid it, this shit comes up every few years, some guy comes along and claims he's discovered how to get more energy out of something than the energy put in. When they rewrite the Law Of Energy Conservation, let us know.
@TheJomogogo But he isn't getting more energy out of the system. Energy from the microwaves acts on the water allowing it to give off that energy as heat. The remarkable thing is how the energy is transferred. That's what is so special about it. It's a very efficient device for transferring electrical energy into an intense flame.
@yodathepimp2 John Kanzius died from pneumonia on February 18, 2009, aged 64, at a hospital near Sanibel, Florida, where he had a winter home. The pneumonia developed as complication after two recent rounds of chemotherapy.
@biketouristpodcast Very true, but the input power is, obviously, electricity which can be generated. It will certainly be less than electronically powered cars and it replaces fossil fuels.
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the coverup is very strong,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
Meh, you will still need the machine to produce the frequency on the water so the fire is kept alive. To run the machine you need electricity, to get electricity you need a generator... and a powerful one.
@cresidue Don't you mean the entire U.S. Government they own? A politicians only job is to get the masses to STFU by making them think all the problems of the world are out of our control.
@cresidue The reason it's not on the market is because its useless. The laws of thermodynamics and energy conservation make this idea completely obsolete as a viable fuel. You have to put in a LOT of energy to cause that burning to occur.
@jaffey2006 Don't comment to me unless you know what you're talking about, I don't have time or the inclination to school you on HHO or the tech behind it. You're blocked.
@cresidue Actually I do know what I'm talking about, and apparently much better than you do. Let me explain it to you. Lets take a simpler version.. the standard HHO process: H2O + Energy --> H2 + O2 --> H2O + Energy. The energy you get out cannot by the laws of physics be more than what you put in. Water is NOT a fuel, it must be turned into fuel by putting energy in. Disprove me, since you know so much.
@jaffey2006 Are you still there, what did you do Cut & Paste that from Wikipedia? Wow, that's impressive & I bow down to your superior ineptitude, now STFU!! "Disprove" you, you're doing a great job showing everyone what a simpleton you are without my help... I don't have time to school YOU but, you might look up Stanley Meyer fuel cell & VIC (that's Voltage Intensifying Circuit) & if your small brain doesn't explode I might give you a little more info later!
I'm familiar with the VIC, however it is still not effective at making water a viable fuel. I've said it before and I'll say it again - if this idea was so great, it would be on the market and would be used in cars all over the world already. You cannot create a net gain of energy from the splitting and then combusting of water. The VIC is a better method, but still does not produce more energy then is consumed.
@SittingOnEdgeman I've love you armchair scientist types, if the world was left to people like you, the wheel, the new world, the automobile, powered flight, human space flight would not have been invented! The laws of physics prove that a bumble should NOT be able to fly, yet no one told the bumble bee so he goes on his merry flight anyway. Now, think for one small moment that someone created a way to generate power for a Stanley Meyer type fuel cell by using a free abundant energy source...
@cresidue I'm not an "armchair scientist". I'm an engineer. Automobiles, powered flight, and human spaceflight come from my profession- so, you're welcome
By the way: google "bumble bee flying physics" and click on any of the links.
We've known for a while how bumblebees fly- and it doesn't defy the laws of physics.
There's no such thing as a free lunch. You can't create energy from nothing. It can be made from mass, and mass can be made from energy, but not nothing.
@SittingOnEdgeman My point was a simple one, I'll explain it for your tiny mind. Physicists had to be PROVEN wrong, & when our (technical) ability to examine the bumblebees flight was made possible they were! UNTIL that point "physics" claimed that it was impossible for the bumblebee to fly. In the same way you & others cannot fathom HHO technology that defies your precious "laws of thermodynamics" free thinking scientists are working on these problems. Hence ARMCHAIR SCIENTIST stands! So STFU!
@cresidue Physics never claimed it was impossible for the bumblebee to fly; they just didn't know how it was done. Show me one peer reviewed, scientific paper claiming bumblebee flight was impossible by the laws of physics.
@cresidue HHO doesn't defy the 'law of thermodynamics'. It just plain doesn't work. It's never been replicated in a laboratory, despite many attempts; people 'burn water' in physics classes every day around the country and no one finds HHO. And BTW- there is no such thing as HHO. It's H2O. HHO is a myth that no one has ever found chemically, nor ever proven possible.
@cresidue I will be fair. He COULD power a car with this... but he's still powering the cycle with outside electricity. Stanley meyer's device or this one, if actually created, would end up being little more than very, very, very inneficient electric cars. You expend energy and increase entropy by forcing a chemical reaction that doesn't happen in nature and then reverse it, yielding up-at best- the same amount of heat energy as you put into it as work. It would be more efficient to use a motor.
@SittingOnEdgeman Oh it was "actually created" and when he died everything was confiscated from his home & workshop. Now, without getting too conspiratorial, who do YOU think would actually benefit from suppressing this or ANY competing technology to petroleum?!! As for you "entropy" that is the same tired excuse people like you have been using for decades, & I'll simply point to nuclear breeder reactors as an obvious counterpoint to you more in less out argument.
Nuclear breeder reactors don't violate the laws of thermodynamics.
You're releasing thermal energy from the breaking of atoms of an element, transforming that element into a different element, and increasing entropy while doing so because heat transfer increases entropy. You're decreasing the energy and entropy of the fuel to increase the energy and entropy of water, from which you can extract work. The products are subsequently used- again to produce entropy by fission and increased entropy.
@SittingOnEdgeman NO ONE said "nuclear breeder reactors" violate the "laws of thermodynamics" only YOU. I was talking about your "entropy" argument & I proved your previous statements wrong & incoherent with that one simple fact. Stop trying to compete with your intellectual superiors; you're only on this post as an obvious FLAMER..
@cresidue Entropy IS the Second Law of Thermodynamics; so if Nuclear Breeder Reactors don't violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics, then they don't prove me wrong about entropy. And I proved they do not destroy entropy- which means they don't violate the second law of thermo, which means they don't prove me wrong about entropy.
"Stop trying to compete with your intellectual superiors; you're only on this post as an obvious FLAMER.."
@cresidue Or, if you want a less technical explanation, google "do fast breeders reactors violates thermodynamic laws" (with quotes) and look for a result titled "What Is the First Law of Thermodynamics", should be the first one.
Basically, all a breeder reactor does is refine the uranium for you- you can't reverse the process and get net work, you can't decrease entropy with it, etc.
@cresidue Y'all are funny. What's happening here is equivalent to electrolysis plus an open flame. The water gets separated from the hydrogen because of the energy input into the water. What's burning is hydrogen.
This guy is going around his elbow to get to his ass. Water isn't burning.
Setting that technical detail aside, he's putting in more power than he's getting out. He's putting in 1.4 kW to the RF generator, and won't get anything like that out of it electrically or mechanically.
I see this fuel source applying more to large scale power production than autos. Who cares how much initial energy must be applied...once the industrial boilers are up to pressure you will be producing all the energy you need to keep the radio waves coming. I believe a 2000+ degree flame will be more than ample to create steam The main problem lies in our economic system in relation to energy production for the masses.
yea but did u hear what the lady said in the begining " it could change the world" but the fact is that the goverment wont let it..the dont control us but they control what we can and can't have...same with the cure for cancer...and if they do it wont be cheap that is a promise......
Don't you see the price of water will be more expensive than gas. Bottled water is already more than gas. They will make a buck off us one way or another. If it's better for the environment then that's great. So who will be the first salt water car dealer in the US?
Hi sir, lets exchange knowlige, i am know 2 plants here in Australia which one very good to healing cancer, write me and i am happy to telling you all about free for you.
@Funchaku It's not DESTORYING the water... burning things just breaks them up into molecules. So the water will still be there, just in tiny particles floating around the air. And i'm sure we already have tiny water molecules floating around the air... look outi
Yet another news agency duped by idiots promoting pseudo science, they really should hire a research dept to discover BS like this before they make asses of themselves and air this crap.
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF (based on the Maxwell's equations) that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation.
In mass production, making a 6kW generator will cost $1200, value of the energy produced yearly $5400. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
theres an old guy who invented a car that runs on water a honda accord model 90 or something like 10 years ago or more but the goverment of his country didn't let him patent the car or the cell couse that would brake down all the oil industry. the video is on you tubue why putting these guys on the news instead of that old man who invented it first.
The reason we have not seen any practical applications of these so called "free energy" systems on the market is not due to covert asassinations by shady government agencies, but simply due to the fact that none of these hair-brained schemes actualy work. You CAN NOT produce energy from nothing, it violates the laws of physics.
Not only that, but converting any heat produced back into electricity is terribly inefficient, and so most energy is lost in the process.
Likewise his cancer idea was equally bullshit. Cancer cells are the same as regular cells, except for the fact that their replication switch is stuck in the on possition so to speak, and hence they keep reproducing themselves unchecked. They are no more or less likely to attract "tiny bits of gold" (lol) than any other cells in the body.
This psuedo-scientific kook has no place being on the news.
Gandlbass is entrirely correct, this system uses more energy than it produces. The fuel is not "salt water alone" as the narator states, but salt water and radio waves, which take a lot of power to generate.
@dzgfdg because number one water is free, and the goverment is not gonna let water fuel take the place of oil fuel because they wanty to keep taxing the hell out of it, open your eyes you dumbasses, electric cars have been around since the 1800s! look it up, so why hasnt the goverment done anything about this better fuel effiecency? because its all about money! the american goverment is playing everyone like a dumbass, just like you!
This is just water electrolysis... the reason why it burns is because the water molecules split, releasing Oxygen and Hydrogen (Hydrogen is EXTREMELY flammable). Once you light the stream of Hydrogen coming out, well...
Also the reason why the saltwater part is significant is that electrolysis (the splitting of a water molecule using electricity) of water is only efficient with large amounts of salt in the water.
pengald 5 days ago
Amazing!
KillBaddBugz 2 weeks ago
I can see the price of salt going up then... lol.
frantastic2012 1 month ago
What they don't show is the radio generator plugged into the wall...
SpanishFlyGuy 2 months ago
I wonder what Radio Frequency he was using?? Also how much RF Power was he using for the Test?? I know you can light up a Florescent Light under some High Voltage Power lines, that is at extremely low Frequency... Anyway, I think it’s a really cool experiment.. I give him an A+ for his invention!!!
AviatorGuy 4 months ago
@AviatorGuy About 14 Mhz. Actually RF is one of many Ionization energies. If you google RF Ion energy source this is similar, but used with gas based ions. Solution based ions are more stable. This isn't just restricted to salt water. The ion types such a chlorine may provide better results than sodium.
Phantasm911 2 months ago
This is a better way to extract HHO than with electrolysis. With this, i think a car running only on water is more than possible. Japaneese company Genepax said thay made a prototype
igrecman 5 months ago
Haha awesome! This will do just fine when my boat is finished... now on to some magnetic energy here :P
spectrospirit 5 months ago
This is great! You only have to have a high power electromagnetic transmitter and a big extension cord to run it and you too disassociate enough hydrogen to make a little-bitty flame. Of course, you have to keep the engine in the tiny little space next to the transmitter where it has enough power density to light up a florescent light bulb.
justinrayjackson1 6 months ago
The energy required to cause electrolysis of the salt water (i.e. generating hydrogen, and, technically, oxygen) requires more energy then that which will be available for use once the gas(es) are produced. It is a grossly inefficient system because you must have much more energy going into the system then it will generate. It cannot sustain itself. There are no gains here, just a series of very massive loss after loss.
MrIHADANACCOUNT 6 months ago 4
@MrIHADANACCOUNT I agree, this sounds like another meens of producing HHO but at an extremly high loss factor. unless they can produce this radio frequency with a minature unit and a car battery I dont see this having any effect of anything. conventional electrolosis is more effiecient than this.
SeanofZeus 4 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT It is very obvious you are not a scientist and are just talking out of your ass! Is some corpuration putting you up to it to be a nay sayer? If you Build one feel free to explain it and how it works, until then keep you disinformation to yourself and Shut the Fuck UP!
diballynibally 2 months ago
@diballynibally Your illiteracy speaks volumes!
MrIHADANACCOUNT 2 months ago
@MrIHADANACCOUNT Right now not a possibility, but possibly can be useful in the future.
xNevlosx 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stream.,.It`.`Now``,
ＷＷＷ.ＭＯＶＩＥＴＩＭＥＯＮＬＩＮＥ.ＴＫ
Copy",.&.'`Paste.."
satisfyingfirewIO 6 months ago
cancer has already a cure. it's been suppressed and i wouldn't doubt it if some corp. comes along and suppresses this technology as well to protect the oil companies. This man could very well end up dead if he isn't very careful.
QunahMelchizedec 6 months ago
A genuin American inventor! USA is so funny, making the hole world laugh :)
danielkarlssonbbod 6 months ago
Haha! Hes using electricity to power a machine that burns the salt water which runs the steam engine... Why not just power the motor directly with the electricity?
Otherworld314 7 months ago
Comment removed
cjlouis1029 6 months ago
@Otherworld314 I am no scientist, and see the point you make however, when I think about it, lets say this took off (which it hasnt obviously ) you could use a tiny amount of coal to power the radio emitter, which then initiates the combustion of the salt water... then the salt water would continue to power the radio emitter, whilst more saltwater is combusted to produce more energy for your needs... so it would become an endless cycle of abundant, and clean energy... I think, its a cool idea
zibafu 6 months ago
like stem cells, WHY AREN'T WE INVESTING THIS? Oh wait. Globalization strikes again
Goldenfightinglink 7 months ago
cool as fuck!
TheUNCC23 7 months ago
they use RF in the new sulphur plasma lighting technologies. You get about the same amount of lumens as a 600w HID for only half the wattage. So I would imagine that it wouldn't cost too much energy in RF radiation as one would think, derp
isaacsmothers 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY`':COPY'`;&`,:PASTE`;,
ＷＷＷ.ＮＥＷＳＴＲＥＡＭＭＯＶＩＥＳ.ＴＫ
SIMPLY,`.COPY..`&;:'PASTE.;`
HartleyBaxter 8 months ago
Comment removed
paulgw3 9 months ago
it amazes me how simple minded people are on this world.. lol
paulgw3 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The question is, does it consume more or less energy then it uses to create the effect. Unless it produces more energy then it uses to produce the radio waves it's just a fancy parlor trick.
NANOELMAGO 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
they killed him!!!!!!!!
davidshareef 9 months ago
Considering it takes energy to generate the radio waves to separate the hydrogen in this process it's not really a viable solution for are growing energy crisis. But its medical applications look very promising. Can I invest with you? I really believe the medical applications from this technology will be a game changer in the cancer treatment . I'm really interested to see where this will all go in a few years.
tampabayismyhome 9 months ago
@tampabayismyhome If you use an external energy to seperate enough hydrogen once you can then used the result of this as fuel for more seperation. It really is an amazing solution.
OliverTheApple 9 months ago
wow! I want a car that runs on salt water! I've been talking about this for a long time!
serpephone 9 months ago
can you make How-to? :D
Dri0m 9 months ago
It's just one little problem.. how much energy does that radio frequency generator use? about equivalent to the amount of energy you get from burning the saltwater (hydrogen gas) maybe?
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 it doesn't matter, the efficiency is always higher than 1. You just give an initial input of energy with the radio waves and water starts to burn, just imagine a pool of gasoline is the water and a lighter radio waves.
sickjedi3 9 months ago
@sickjedi3 I understand your comparison, but the difference is that the process needs a continuous "stream" of strong radiowaves to maintain the saltwater burning. So, in theory, the salt is involved in some sort of chemical reaction to release the energy stored in the water.. but what is left after the reaction? i'm just wondering about the chemical substances involved here, and by that make a calculation of how much energy you could actually gain from the process.. if any.
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 Just thought of another thing.. the only molecule that can be made from the atoms involved that can burn with a flame like that, is hydrogen gas, and extracting hydrogen gas from water is normally a VERY energy demanding process (in which you actually lose some energy in the long run).
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 the energy is the heat it creates and at 1500c there is more energy than you might think
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 No shit the energy is heat.. tell me something i don't know.
But that heat has an equivalent energy (almost) to that which is consumed by the radio frequency generator.
Your answer does not explain why and how the process can produce more energy than it consumes..
You have to give some scientific explanation of this specific process which proves your statement.. it's just that nobody can, because there is no such thing as gaining energy from water.
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 ok... and your point is what exactly? The HEAT is still the factor here. I'm sure you can come up with a few creative ways to use HEAT I'm sure.. It doesn't take a scientist to figure this one out. What runs the combustion of your car?? What keeps you warm in the winter? Do I need to continue? And the process of this can be achieved by other means than this equation, but I'm going to assume you haven't gotten that far this semester yet.
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 It's pretty clear that you do not know what you're talking about.
Your point is, if i've got this right, that you get energy from this process like you do when for example gasoline is combusted in a piston engine?
Gasoline is a carbohydrate (a molecule that contains mostly carbon and hydrogen atoms), a NON OXIDATED molecule. a substance which contains high energy value, that we extract from raw oil. It's an easily ignited fluid that can give heat and/or pressure energy while burning.
pelkas87 9 months ago
@paulgw3 BUT in the case with water, a molecule which contains one oxygen and 2 hydrogen atoms, (which is an OXIDATED molecule), it takes an equivalent amount of energy to SEPARATE the atoms to extract the hydrogen gas (H2), which is the "fuel" in the process, that the process itself can produce. This process is, of course, the hydrogen oxidates (burns) to convert back to water. If you understand the basics of chemistry and physics, you would know exactly what i'm talking about.
pelkas87 9 months ago
@paulgw3 And if you don't understand the basics, this is one of the most fundamental rules: Energy can not be created or destroyed, it can only change form
pelkas87 9 months ago
@paulgw3 So, in gasoline, there is STORED energy, which we use when we take a drive in our cars, while in water, you DO NOT have stored energy. Does that answer make it easier for you?
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 everything is energy, some useful some only not as useful yet because we have no idea how to use it. FIRE and HEAT is usable energy that can be transferred from one object to another... This is like trying to explain something to a dog. Thy're interested, but just don't seem to get it.
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 Yes there's different kinds of energy, that can be used in different ways, but it's still the same AMOUNT of energy, no matter what state it's in.
I wonder who's the dog in this conversation.. or cockroach more like it.
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 do have any idea how much energy is in 1500c heat? Do have any clue how many application that energy can be transferred too which consumes less than what has been created? Use your head here buddy, you are making yourself look like an idiot. Seriously! Everyone else seems to get it but you for what ever reason. I’m assuming that’s how your life typically is in general at this point.
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 Everyone else but me? i guess you haven't read any of the other comments on this video, but if you do, and there still is some braincells in that pothead of yours, you might get a clue of who's the idiot.
I'm making points that has scientific foundation, and you're just rambling about "so much energy in 1500c heat" xD give me a break.
Now i want you to explain in detail how you reasoned while you "figured out" that you could create energy by this process.. i'm waiting.....
pelkas87 9 months ago
@paulgw3 And please, in contrary to all of your other dumb ass comments, just TRY to put in some scientific foundation in your answer, or we would have to determine you as a real lowlife moron who actually thinks he's got a clue.
Now i'm gonna give you a quote for you to reflect on; "Arguing with idiots who has no scientific knowledge or insight, is like arguing with religious people;
proof has no value, only their own opinion does, no matter how absurd".
Which one is you?
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 hey idiot.. are you going to answer any of my questions, or are you going to try to argue your way into trying to make me look like you? I have asked you 5-6 questions and yet you seem to have ignored the entire basis for this discussion. You are a child, and nothing more. Go away... Loser, and get a job!
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 Really? i'd say it's the other way around... the only thing i've done is explaining to you why you're wrong. @paulgw3; The wheel spins, but the hamster is dead, get it? guess not.
PS: I've got a job, a really fucking good one, but i suppose you're either stuck in some shitty factory or just unemployed living off the tax payers like fucking leach
pelkas87 9 months ago
@pelkas87 LMAO JUSt watch the videos below and they'll explain what you obviously cant come up with on your on.. you tool. Critical thinking is a great attribute, and soo sad when others have no ability to do so.
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 BTW in your ranting, you have YET to answer any of my quastions.. proving me to be yet again CORRECT!! LMAO You are seriously dumber than you make yourself out to be.
paulgw3 9 months ago
@paulgw3 And what happens when the water "burns" is that it's transforming back to water - which gives exactly the same amount of energy as you needed to put in to separate the atoms in the first place, unless you add energy in the process.. but then you go +-0 anyway.
pelkas87 9 months ago
And if you failed pedants want to quibble whattayasay you check out "Orbo" technology by Steorn. That should give you all kinds of things to quack about.
1mkwalker 10 months ago
@1mkwalker Oh yeah? Have you heard anything new about this "revolutionary" technology lately? All i've heard is that a test jury of independent scientists in this specific area has established that you can not get a net energy output by using the orbo technology.... do you even know how it presumably works, or did you just happen to trip over it while roaming the internet and decided it was the truth?
pelkas87 9 months ago
Imagine ships, submarines, or underwater homes powered by this kind of fuel. Or cars. Or heat for homes. Say Buh Bye Big Oil...
1mkwalker 10 months ago
64 people have shares in oil companies.
MartinThatcher 10 months ago
Is he still alive or have the feul companies killed him.
controledinsanity 10 months ago 3
@controledinsanity cancer killed him
jkuvinator 2 weeks ago
This guy better be careful, the government will make him disappear, if u get my drift
dirkjardiggler 10 months ago
@dirkjardiggler Make him dissapear. After millions of people have seen the "invention." After everyone knows how it works. Setting aside the fact that this 'invention' isn't worth stealing, they would have to make everyone that watched this video dissapear... and everyone who found a way to download it, because this video shows you everything you need to know about how to recreate it.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@SittingOnEdgeman ..And considering this, why would'nt someone by now have created a device that would work, in incontrary to steorns joke of invention?
pelkas87 9 months ago
ok.. we gotta reverse engineer this
ZippoLag 10 months ago
It runs on water man !!!!
Darkillpalazzo 10 months ago
@jaffey2006 it's 2 H2O+ energy yields 2 H2 and O2
scienceman64 10 months ago
Derp! I wonder if it's hydrogen? God these people are retards. We've known how to do this for years. Hell, I did it with batteries when I was a kid.
cptnblackbeard 10 months ago
derp, how much energy was imputed?
goddamnfaggots 10 months ago 14
this guy needs to read about Dr. Ruth B. Drown her Radionics studies done during the 1900's that where stolen by the government
starks758 10 months ago
John Kanzius is an American hero. He had almost found a cure to cancer, meanwhile accidentally creating an alternative fuel source. It is a shame we lost him almost 2 years ago to the day.
God rest you John Kanzius
PsuedoNam 10 months ago
Steam Engines & Compressed Air - 2 Undeveloped Technologies That Have Been Around For Hundreds & Thousands of Years.
44AlphaMale44 11 months ago
O Jesus, son of Mary! Is thy Lord able to send down for us a table spread with food from heaven
ow (DOT) ly/41YZ6
ahmd1431 11 months ago
Anyone want to guess what is produced in this video? Here's a clue... It rhymes with asthma.
Nutricidal 11 months ago
Interesting how nobody in the video says how much energy was required by the machine to burn the fuel. If it was less, then they could use the saltwater energy to fuel the machine to burn more saltwater, thus creating a cycle of INFINITE ENERGY.
Oh wait, shit doesn't work that way...
Big oil didn't stop this, and neither did the government. It was just a stupid idea to begin with. I can't believe this garbage actually passes for journalism.
redherrings 11 months ago 2
@redherrings SURE, he didn't find infinite energy. But that wasn't the goal of Kanziuses Research. What you may not have known is that machine that Kanzius was developing was the cutting edge in research for the cure to cancer. His research was critically acclaimed by many institutions as the most viable method to cure cancer.
Unfortunately Kanzius left us too soon. He died February of 2009 from Pneumonia.
PsuedoNam 10 months ago
@redherrings And please, also note that not even a month after his salt water discovery, Kanzius openly admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas.
PsuedoNam 10 months ago 2
it's hilarious how many people in these comments think this guy was onto something and "the man" held him down. you must believe in chemtrails too.
salt water isn't a fuel here, it's a medium being acted on by a large wave generating machine powered by electricity. why would you use that energy to make a flame to run a steam engine when you could have just used the electricity to power an electric motor? it's like putting a glass of water in the microwave, nothing more.
JJJJZ 11 months ago 9
Comment removed
cjlouis1029 6 months ago
@JJJJZ It's been a couple years since I saw this video and I don't have sound on my computer right now but:
In the video didn't they say that once ignited, the salt water will just continue "burning" without any need for external energy? In which case, we'd be using the chemical energy of the salt water as energy, not electricity like you said. So how do you explain that
theguyi26 6 months ago
@JJJJZ well, it's a little more than a microwave. Microwaves don't ignite it.
Hrel88 4 months ago
wow bitter comments, the government is coming to getcha
I am sure some company is working on it right now
if you can't be positive for the future, lie down in a field and blow your brains out of your head or don't have kids
garycalgary 11 months ago
@garycalgary If we do want our civilisations to have a decent future here on Earth, the best thing would be to forbid inbred idiots like you to have kids, by which means you would spread your diseased DNA and thereby reverse the human genetic evolution.
pelkas87 9 months ago
1:49 to 1:58 hahahaha sorry i bet that guys really smart it was just funny
driscol1818 11 months ago
Wow, even the reporter was taken by this crap. "The only fuel is salt water." Uh, no. It seems pretty clear that the energy is coming from the RF field that he's bombarding the salt water with. It's not free energy.
That said, it's still a really interesting invention he's got there. I had no idea that you could split water with an RF field. Does he ever say the specifics of the field he is generating? Wavelength and power density, anything?
MathDoobler 11 months ago 2
Hmm.. so there has been no progress since? This is more than 3 year old info.
frosted1030 11 months ago 2
something tells me the radio frequency generator uses more power than the heat creates... just a hunch
roofy2k 11 months ago 3
anyone that uses 80/20 in their shop is cool by me lol
roofy2k 11 months ago
More energy is required than what is released by the burning hydrogen. Similar to electrolysis of water, might even be cheaper, though electrical motors are more efficient anyway.
lleksikon 11 months ago
Funny he is looking for cure for cancer when there is a cure. Its in whole organic raw foods, good health, hemp oil and more.
Why not keep this technology for the masses and not sell it to big oil. This would eliminate many causes to today's unsustainable practices which in turn would eliminate many stress causing environments for the whole planet.
This is the same story of the man who built a battery what would take a car 300 miler per charge. Patent sold to Chevron. Sick world.
vigilance71 1 year ago
Nothing more disheartening than realizing BP YouTube Channel is a Suggestion to viewers of this video. lol... fuck my life right? Wonder if the masses will always get fucked over by the wealthy or if it will ever change =/
AutofireDev 1 year ago
This is not good... Can you imagen someone using this to evap. water in the ocean. Crazy huh!?
aricuzzi 1 year ago
@aricuzzi ...and to evaporate enough water to even be noticable, it would require more energy than the earth could ever produce in a mans lifetime...
pelkas87 9 months ago
i now know what they mean by saying fight fire with fire
ELFHUNTER50 1 year ago
Is he dead what happend to him all this years????
MaltaWheels 1 year ago
Comment removed
ESTAUST01 1 year ago
now point the machine at ocean :D big bada boom XD
predvcecerom 1 year ago
@predvcecerom lol 5th element
CondemnedPatriot 1 year ago
Comment removed
dnabiologic 1 year ago
SO he just built a homemade radio wave generator before he did this big version.. How hard can that be with pie pans = aluminum which reflects radio waves, sorta like how lasers works reflecting light energy between 2 mirrors and amplifying it, or concentrating the waves parabolicly.. he mentioned that he made radio wave generator after the kind of kit they sold when he was young, on another video.
so why not just add variable tuning capacitor to find the sweet spot?
frank0067 1 year ago
Amazing, this guy should take the next step & make a salt water engine, because sad to say you know our government doesn't want this to happen.
tjgates4888 1 year ago
huge machine, tiny motor...... I'll have to see some numbers instead of a journalist's hype. You think you can cure cancer? I'll give you my money. You think you need to come up with a "free energy source" to get a new grant? I'll pass
maconswift 1 year ago
This is amazing, thank you!
Isaacthompson 1 year ago
RIP Mr. Kanzius
Coondog3607 1 year ago
Late night space cakes can give you these amazing ideas.
SaveDurban 1 year ago
Did he own that station.?
SaveDurban 1 year ago
Has he gone missing.?
SaveDurban 1 year ago
i can burn a candle, with more flame to money costs. ffs
TedFnBuckle 1 year ago
GO TO THE ETHANOL 1 COMMERCIAL U TUBE
THEMESSIAHISETHANOL1 1 year ago
How much do you bet it was bought and hidden away?
yodathepimp2 1 year ago 34
@yodathepimp2
Nobody bought this an hid it, this shit comes up every few years, some guy comes along and claims he's discovered how to get more energy out of something than the energy put in. When they rewrite the Law Of Energy Conservation, let us know.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo But he isn't getting more energy out of the system. Energy from the microwaves acts on the water allowing it to give off that energy as heat. The remarkable thing is how the energy is transferred. That's what is so special about it. It's a very efficient device for transferring electrical energy into an intense flame.
yodathepimp2 1 year ago
@yodathepimp2 John Kanzius died from pneumonia on February 18, 2009, aged 64, at a hospital near Sanibel, Florida, where he had a winter home. The pneumonia developed as complication after two recent rounds of chemotherapy.
tobigforyou 1 year ago
@tobigforyou Aww man that just sucks..
yodathepimp2 1 year ago
That happans to me to i will be looking for somthing and i will find somthing else that i lost.
omega4chimp 1 year ago
"water the most abundent element in the world" element? learn basic chemistry before you try to save the worlds energy needs.
isorry4strokin 1 year ago
@isorry4strokin clearly he's speaking of the four elements: air, fire, earth and water. give the guy a break ;)
equanimity1113293 1 year ago
@isorry4strokin Yes h2o
rayorj 1 year ago
@rayorj
Which is a molecule not an element. It is made up of the elements Oxygen and hydrogen.
isorry4strokin 1 year ago
What about the input power? How much power are you putting versus what you get out, in other words, how efficient is it? Thanks, cool discovery!
biketouristpodcast 1 year ago
@biketouristpodcast Very true, but the input power is, obviously, electricity which can be generated. It will certainly be less than electronically powered cars and it replaces fossil fuels.
narutofan190249 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unlimited energy sources are out there!But the coverup is very strong,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the energy revolution!
urgencyharviefcem 1 year ago
Another great American invention that will never come to be because of Big Oil & the politicians they own!
cresidue 1 year ago 24
@cresidue
Meh, you will still need the machine to produce the frequency on the water so the fire is kept alive. To run the machine you need electricity, to get electricity you need a generator... and a powerful one.
KingOfTheBeyond23 1 year ago
@cresidue Don't you mean the entire U.S. Government they own? A politicians only job is to get the masses to STFU by making them think all the problems of the world are out of our control.
CondemnedPatriot 1 year ago
@CondemnedPatriot I'll agree with that. :)
cresidue 11 months ago
@cresidue The reason it's not on the market is because its useless. The laws of thermodynamics and energy conservation make this idea completely obsolete as a viable fuel. You have to put in a LOT of energy to cause that burning to occur.
jaffey2006 10 months ago
@jaffey2006 Don't comment to me unless you know what you're talking about, I don't have time or the inclination to school you on HHO or the tech behind it. You're blocked.
cresidue 10 months ago
@cresidue Actually I do know what I'm talking about, and apparently much better than you do. Let me explain it to you. Lets take a simpler version.. the standard HHO process: H2O + Energy --> H2 + O2 --> H2O + Energy. The energy you get out cannot by the laws of physics be more than what you put in. Water is NOT a fuel, it must be turned into fuel by putting energy in. Disprove me, since you know so much.
jaffey2006 10 months ago
@jaffey2006 Are you still there, what did you do Cut & Paste that from Wikipedia? Wow, that's impressive & I bow down to your superior ineptitude, now STFU!! "Disprove" you, you're doing a great job showing everyone what a simpleton you are without my help... I don't have time to school YOU but, you might look up Stanley Meyer fuel cell & VIC (that's Voltage Intensifying Circuit) & if your small brain doesn't explode I might give you a little more info later!
cresidue 10 months ago
@cresidue
I'm familiar with the VIC, however it is still not effective at making water a viable fuel. I've said it before and I'll say it again - if this idea was so great, it would be on the market and would be used in cars all over the world already. You cannot create a net gain of energy from the splitting and then combusting of water. The VIC is a better method, but still does not produce more energy then is consumed.
jaffey2006 10 months ago
@cresidue As to the Stanley Meyer fuel cell: Look up the "First Law of Thermodynamics".
At the beginning of the cycle, you have water.
At the end of the cycle, you have water.
At the beginning of the cycle, you input electrical work.
At the end of the cycle, you get a portion of that work back- up to a maximum of 100%, if you can find a way to make all four processes isentropic.
Unless you are creating energy from nothing- or from nuclear sources- you cannot extract work from this cycle.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@SittingOnEdgeman I've love you armchair scientist types, if the world was left to people like you, the wheel, the new world, the automobile, powered flight, human space flight would not have been invented! The laws of physics prove that a bumble should NOT be able to fly, yet no one told the bumble bee so he goes on his merry flight anyway. Now, think for one small moment that someone created a way to generate power for a Stanley Meyer type fuel cell by using a free abundant energy source...
cresidue 10 months ago
@cresidue I'm not an "armchair scientist". I'm an engineer. Automobiles, powered flight, and human spaceflight come from my profession- so, you're welcome
By the way: google "bumble bee flying physics" and click on any of the links.
We've known for a while how bumblebees fly- and it doesn't defy the laws of physics.
There's no such thing as a free lunch. You can't create energy from nothing. It can be made from mass, and mass can be made from energy, but not nothing.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@SittingOnEdgeman My point was a simple one, I'll explain it for your tiny mind. Physicists had to be PROVEN wrong, & when our (technical) ability to examine the bumblebees flight was made possible they were! UNTIL that point "physics" claimed that it was impossible for the bumblebee to fly. In the same way you & others cannot fathom HHO technology that defies your precious "laws of thermodynamics" free thinking scientists are working on these problems. Hence ARMCHAIR SCIENTIST stands! So STFU!
cresidue 10 months ago
@cresidue Physics never claimed it was impossible for the bumblebee to fly; they just didn't know how it was done. Show me one peer reviewed, scientific paper claiming bumblebee flight was impossible by the laws of physics.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@cresidue HHO doesn't defy the 'law of thermodynamics'. It just plain doesn't work. It's never been replicated in a laboratory, despite many attempts; people 'burn water' in physics classes every day around the country and no one finds HHO. And BTW- there is no such thing as HHO. It's H2O. HHO is a myth that no one has ever found chemically, nor ever proven possible.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@cresidue ...Which would be? xD "free abundant energy source" LOL i'm presuming you're joking?
pelkas87 9 months ago
@cresidue I will be fair. He COULD power a car with this... but he's still powering the cycle with outside electricity. Stanley meyer's device or this one, if actually created, would end up being little more than very, very, very inneficient electric cars. You expend energy and increase entropy by forcing a chemical reaction that doesn't happen in nature and then reverse it, yielding up-at best- the same amount of heat energy as you put into it as work. It would be more efficient to use a motor.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@SittingOnEdgeman Oh it was "actually created" and when he died everything was confiscated from his home & workshop. Now, without getting too conspiratorial, who do YOU think would actually benefit from suppressing this or ANY competing technology to petroleum?!! As for you "entropy" that is the same tired excuse people like you have been using for decades, & I'll simply point to nuclear breeder reactors as an obvious counterpoint to you more in less out argument.
cresidue 10 months ago
Nuclear breeder reactors don't violate the laws of thermodynamics.
You're releasing thermal energy from the breaking of atoms of an element, transforming that element into a different element, and increasing entropy while doing so because heat transfer increases entropy. You're decreasing the energy and entropy of the fuel to increase the energy and entropy of water, from which you can extract work. The products are subsequently used- again to produce entropy by fission and increased entropy.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@SittingOnEdgeman NO ONE said "nuclear breeder reactors" violate the "laws of thermodynamics" only YOU. I was talking about your "entropy" argument & I proved your previous statements wrong & incoherent with that one simple fact. Stop trying to compete with your intellectual superiors; you're only on this post as an obvious FLAMER..
cresidue 10 months ago
@cresidue Entropy IS the Second Law of Thermodynamics; so if Nuclear Breeder Reactors don't violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics, then they don't prove me wrong about entropy. And I proved they do not destroy entropy- which means they don't violate the second law of thermo, which means they don't prove me wrong about entropy.
"Stop trying to compete with your intellectual superiors; you're only on this post as an obvious FLAMER.."
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@cresidue Or, if you want a less technical explanation, google "do fast breeders reactors violates thermodynamic laws" (with quotes) and look for a result titled "What Is the First Law of Thermodynamics", should be the first one.
Basically, all a breeder reactor does is refine the uranium for you- you can't reverse the process and get net work, you can't decrease entropy with it, etc.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
@cresidue Y'all are funny. What's happening here is equivalent to electrolysis plus an open flame. The water gets separated from the hydrogen because of the energy input into the water. What's burning is hydrogen.
This guy is going around his elbow to get to his ass. Water isn't burning.
Setting that technical detail aside, he's putting in more power than he's getting out. He's putting in 1.4 kW to the RF generator, and won't get anything like that out of it electrically or mechanically.
SittingOnEdgeman 10 months ago
I see this fuel source applying more to large scale power production than autos. Who cares how much initial energy must be applied...once the industrial boilers are up to pressure you will be producing all the energy you need to keep the radio waves coming. I believe a 2000+ degree flame will be more than ample to create steam The main problem lies in our economic system in relation to energy production for the masses.
overthair 1 year ago
yea but did u hear what the lady said in the begining " it could change the world" but the fact is that the goverment wont let it..the dont control us but they control what we can and can't have...same with the cure for cancer...and if they do it wont be cheap that is a promise......
karm669966 1 year ago
@karm669966 i dont think there will be cure for cancer anytime soon too much money is made from charity's
gazbom0 1 year ago
This was first shown on June 27, 2007. Where has it progressed (or not) since then?
Is it going into file 13 in some warehouse? Is some oil company going to buy the rights and kill it? Just wondering.
rdsanchez1966 1 year ago
Don't you see the price of water will be more expensive than gas. Bottled water is already more than gas. They will make a buck off us one way or another. If it's better for the environment then that's great. So who will be the first salt water car dealer in the US?
gandlbass 1 year ago
if he shoots that radio wave into the ocean we're all screwed :P
bob1012112 1 year ago
GREAT. Give the Terrorist more ideas.
Throw a radio in the ocean and destroy the entire EARTH.
XDDDD
ROFL
sundaypro 1 year ago
Hi sir, lets exchange knowlige, i am know 2 plants here in Australia which one very good to healing cancer, write me and i am happy to telling you all about free for you.
csak1@bigpond.com
Regards Joe
Joecsak1 1 year ago
wow
electradestroyer 1 year ago
it would not take a large wave generator to start the burn.
longhorndb 1 year ago
And then we eventually burn up all the water and kill the earth.... not a good idea in the long term.
Funchaku 1 year ago
@Funchaku
just wait until we burn up all of the fossil fuel in the world.
doubleclutcher336 1 year ago
@doubleclutcher336
I can survive without fossil fuel, but I kinda need water... and so does every living thing on this planet.
Funchaku 1 year ago
@Funchaku It's not DESTORYING the water... burning things just breaks them up into molecules. So the water will still be there, just in tiny particles floating around the air. And i'm sure we already have tiny water molecules floating around the air... look outi
mylilgymsock1 1 year ago
@Funchaku (cont) look outside. clouds are just water.
mylilgymsock1 1 year ago
Yet another news agency duped by idiots promoting pseudo science, they really should hire a research dept to discover BS like this before they make asses of themselves and air this crap.
Fentanyl3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF (based on the Maxwell's equations) that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation.
In mass production, making a 6kW generator will cost $1200, value of the energy produced yearly $5400. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.
H. Tomasz Grzybowski
tel. +48-512-933-540
henrykay01 1 year ago
theres an old guy who invented a car that runs on water a honda accord model 90 or something like 10 years ago or more but the goverment of his country didn't let him patent the car or the cell couse that would brake down all the oil industry. the video is on you tubue why putting these guys on the news instead of that old man who invented it first.
Snither 1 year ago
Oh look its another water energy video. What BS
Backtracer101 1 year ago
and the waves are created by? ... oh yes... some other kind of energy source :)
AFOVIDIUS 1 year ago
The reason we have not seen any practical applications of these so called "free energy" systems on the market is not due to covert asassinations by shady government agencies, but simply due to the fact that none of these hair-brained schemes actualy work. You CAN NOT produce energy from nothing, it violates the laws of physics.
Not only that, but converting any heat produced back into electricity is terribly inefficient, and so most energy is lost in the process.
spentfromnz 1 year ago
Likewise his cancer idea was equally bullshit. Cancer cells are the same as regular cells, except for the fact that their replication switch is stuck in the on possition so to speak, and hence they keep reproducing themselves unchecked. They are no more or less likely to attract "tiny bits of gold" (lol) than any other cells in the body.
This psuedo-scientific kook has no place being on the news.
spentfromnz 1 year ago
Gandlbass is entrirely correct, this system uses more energy than it produces. The fuel is not "salt water alone" as the narator states, but salt water and radio waves, which take a lot of power to generate.
spentfromnz 1 year ago
Totally useless!!!!!!
jib1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dzgfdg because number one water is free, and the goverment is not gonna let water fuel take the place of oil fuel because they wanty to keep taxing the hell out of it, open your eyes you dumbasses, electric cars have been around since the 1800s! look it up, so why hasnt the goverment done anything about this better fuel effiecency? because its all about money! the american goverment is playing everyone like a dumbass, just like you!
blazeman139 1 year ago
Salt water != fuel
agrajag46 1 year ago
watch out mate youll end up dead just like stan meyers
Retro1963 1 year ago
Comment removed
Lovenomore117 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Retro1963 He already passed away last year because of pneumonia. Give him credit for his work and who knows, it'll help both us and our environment
Lovenomore117 1 year ago
Comment removed
dzgfdg 1 year ago
say goodbye to that guy, the government will have him killed in no time, poor guy.