To Shakespeareand more: I always wanted to see the whole of this, and I love John Cleese - have you posted this whole series? I've searched, can't find the beginning!
I have never seen any actor play any Sheakespeare role better. He acts, he brings life to the words/ He does not just recite bland poetry like so many so called actors do.
Dear me! This is indeed the legendary English jokester from Monty Python, who is known to the world for his acting as many authority figures like Sir Lancelot the Brace, Reg the leader of the Peoples Front of Judea, Adolf Hitler, the Roman Centurion from the Life of Brian and so forth? He should have embarked a lot more in serious films: With the beard no one recognizes him and to see him as Macbeth, Oedipus the King, Orestes, Hamlet, Richard III or Earl of Kent would be quite entertaining.
But what I am to do with the play itself, my dear Shakespeare? Was this some short of a cry for help as Petruchio suggested by asking that anyone should speak if he does know a better way to tame a shrewd? How could a poet, who usually employs a lot of heroines like Imogen, Beatrice, Cordelia, Lady Macbeth or Portia draw so simple a picture of women? One cannot deny his art of composing verses and his playful dialogues, jumping by clues in all directions; certainly not his greatest work.
Cleese here delivers performance of rare calibre, at least in screen terms, in managing to make the text feel almost new-minted and utterly his own. I approached with trepidation, I confess, the very concept of Cleese with less than the most bizarre offshoots of Shakespeare, but this is a version which has brought innumerable of my students who knew nothing of Basil the feeling that The Bard can be enjoyable, not perforce stodgy.
Directed, I believe by Dr. Jonathan Miller, a member, along with Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, of "Beyond the Fringe," a sketch revue that preceded and overlapped with "Monty Python."
Has anybody noticed that one of the cronies of the father is being played by Frank Thornton, "Capt. Peacock" from "Are You Being Served?"
It's quite good, the acting more along the lines of what I envisioned rather than the Burton/Taylor version, which in my opinion thought was awful. But the quick banter between Petruchio and Katherine is missing (movable, wasp & sting, etc.), which drags it down quite a bit IMHO.
@Felicity1247 I think you're quite right. Petruchio's monologues are well done, but the quick exchanges with Kate are too slow and too serious. The Taylor/Burton version, for all its different style, manages to do the banter rather well, don't you think?
@Jon93715: I think the Taylor/Burton one was amusing, but sometimes cringingly so. I disliked the scene where they rolled around in the haystacks and when Kate walked on the roof. My favorite banter is the 1980s version with Freddie Ulster and Marc Singer, where the actors really make it funny--with acrobatics too.
@Felicity1247 Is that version online anywhere? I don't think I'd ever mind seeing a new version of this scene, orof IV.i (the dinner). I searched on youtube but couldn't find it.
@Jon93715 Sorry, the production was actually in 1976. It's called "Longer Version of Kate Meets Petruchio" and in the information section you should see stuff about Italian commedia dell'arte.
This is the best Shakespeare I have ever seen, You can actually hear the words, He doesn't gabble, and make too much of the rhythm of it. He does not overact, He acts, perfectly. I remember this from its first showing.
does anyone have the part of the play when they are all having dinner at the end after bincas wedding. and john cleese does that huge wheeze laugh? holy shit that is so funny
Yes, he's pretty much doing Basil Fawlty but to make that specific comic style, delivery, and character work within Shakespeare is brilliant, I think. I wish Mr. Cleese continued in his life to take projects like this one rather than his slow trent into just making the Hollywood film appearances he makes now. He was a genius whose talent sadly has faded with increasing American fame and age.
Comment removed
wvoelcker 3 months ago
To Shakespeareand more: I always wanted to see the whole of this, and I love John Cleese - have you posted this whole series? I've searched, can't find the beginning!
vrikey 4 months ago
At 3:17, is anyone else reminded of Vermeer's "The Music Lesson"?
fishhead06 5 months ago 2
Is there somewhere where one can purchase this fine version?
camp4christ 7 months ago in playlist Shakespeare: Comedies
My favorite version of Taming of the Shrew HANDS DOWN!!!
zannoah25 10 months ago
think u can help me out, wat would betrayal be in this movie(on any character),if u can let me know thankz(bout 6 or more betrayal partz)
pako49r 1 year ago
Cleese's delivery and timing are phenomenal here. I suppose it took a genius like Jonathan Miller to have the courage to cast him.
EliCross 1 year ago
How can you figure out which is the next part after this one?
Ranger308 1 year ago
I have never seen any actor play any Sheakespeare role better. He acts, he brings life to the words/ He does not just recite bland poetry like so many so called actors do.
romanbrough 1 year ago
Dear me! This is indeed the legendary English jokester from Monty Python, who is known to the world for his acting as many authority figures like Sir Lancelot the Brace, Reg the leader of the Peoples Front of Judea, Adolf Hitler, the Roman Centurion from the Life of Brian and so forth? He should have embarked a lot more in serious films: With the beard no one recognizes him and to see him as Macbeth, Oedipus the King, Orestes, Hamlet, Richard III or Earl of Kent would be quite entertaining.
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
But what I am to do with the play itself, my dear Shakespeare? Was this some short of a cry for help as Petruchio suggested by asking that anyone should speak if he does know a better way to tame a shrewd? How could a poet, who usually employs a lot of heroines like Imogen, Beatrice, Cordelia, Lady Macbeth or Portia draw so simple a picture of women? One cannot deny his art of composing verses and his playful dialogues, jumping by clues in all directions; certainly not his greatest work.
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
really wish to get a full clip of this video>
wckabuoh 1 year ago
Cleese here delivers performance of rare calibre, at least in screen terms, in managing to make the text feel almost new-minted and utterly his own. I approached with trepidation, I confess, the very concept of Cleese with less than the most bizarre offshoots of Shakespeare, but this is a version which has brought innumerable of my students who knew nothing of Basil the feeling that The Bard can be enjoyable, not perforce stodgy.
Alcagaur 1 year ago
Directed, I believe by Dr. Jonathan Miller, a member, along with Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, of "Beyond the Fringe," a sketch revue that preceded and overlapped with "Monty Python."
Has anybody noticed that one of the cronies of the father is being played by Frank Thornton, "Capt. Peacock" from "Are You Being Served?"
tuxguys 1 year ago
XD THAT IS FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
loonytoongonemad 1 year ago
well... let them eat kate then...hahahahaha...who want cake now? ...hhahahaha
TheDooRMowsEE 1 year ago
i like the stage one better... the one from 1976. not a huge fan of the elizabeth taylor one. this one's ok... but not physical enough for me.
poisonwood23 1 year ago
It's quite good, the acting more along the lines of what I envisioned rather than the Burton/Taylor version, which in my opinion thought was awful. But the quick banter between Petruchio and Katherine is missing (movable, wasp & sting, etc.), which drags it down quite a bit IMHO.
Felicity1247 2 years ago
@Felicity1247 I think you're quite right. Petruchio's monologues are well done, but the quick exchanges with Kate are too slow and too serious. The Taylor/Burton version, for all its different style, manages to do the banter rather well, don't you think?
Jon93715 1 year ago
@Jon93715: I think the Taylor/Burton one was amusing, but sometimes cringingly so. I disliked the scene where they rolled around in the haystacks and when Kate walked on the roof. My favorite banter is the 1980s version with Freddie Ulster and Marc Singer, where the actors really make it funny--with acrobatics too.
Felicity1247 1 year ago
@Felicity1247 Is that version online anywhere? I don't think I'd ever mind seeing a new version of this scene, orof IV.i (the dinner). I searched on youtube but couldn't find it.
Jon93715 1 year ago
Comment removed
Felicity1247 1 year ago
@Jon93715 Sorry, the production was actually in 1976. It's called "Longer Version of Kate Meets Petruchio" and in the information section you should see stuff about Italian commedia dell'arte.
Felicity1247 1 year ago
this movie version suks. katherina looks like shiyaaT!!!!
the other move version is cooler!
Danerd9 2 years ago
Cleese's reaction at 5:10 is priceless.
tevyef 2 years ago 2
Petruchio is indeed a pimp.
Zerozero27 2 years ago 2
This is the best Shakespeare I have ever seen, You can actually hear the words, He doesn't gabble, and make too much of the rhythm of it. He does not overact, He acts, perfectly. I remember this from its first showing.
romanbrough 2 years ago
Wow she really smacked him there!
Tonyblack261 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jesus shakespeare shits me - does he have to use that snotty nosed speech?
mallamoozoo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yep. Because it works.
tblack2628 2 years ago
Wrong, this is act 2 scene 1
YellowBordello 3 years ago 2
lol i like the insults =)
dustpokeland2 3 years ago
does anyone have the part of the play when they are all having dinner at the end after bincas wedding. and john cleese does that huge wheeze laugh? holy shit that is so funny
platzie 3 years ago
no you can buy this on dvd from ambrose video. they have a website.
ryancyrusshams 3 years ago
JOHN CLEESE! DUDE! AWESOME!
Concetta20 3 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hws just being Basil Fawlty
Moonstone860 3 years ago
Yes, he's pretty much doing Basil Fawlty but to make that specific comic style, delivery, and character work within Shakespeare is brilliant, I think. I wish Mr. Cleese continued in his life to take projects like this one rather than his slow trent into just making the Hollywood film appearances he makes now. He was a genius whose talent sadly has faded with increasing American fame and age.
ryancyrusshams 3 years ago 8
In the name of John Wayne,Old Glory,Spiny Norman the Hedgehog,Doug Dinnsdale & Teddy Rooseveldt, I agree.
RasMajnouni 2 years ago
@ryancyrusshams
Absolutely bang-on! Hear hear!
jbally9365 1 year ago
John's best performance ever. Bar none.
ken131 3 years ago
Brilliant!
rsl98 3 years ago
EXCELLENT! Thank you SO much for uploading this! :D
choirfreak26 3 years ago 3