Added: 2 years ago
From: slickityjim
Views: 12,005
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Mracdcfan321 He won't answer, but i can. I think it's about 1000 Dollars.

    But you can download a demo version for free, like im doing now. No limited time, only differense is that you won't get the real deal, about 80% of it. Anyway, sorry for english =)

  • ok... im a biginner to cinema 4d...what is cinema 4d used for ? to create 3d animations or something like that?

  • @444004541 yes it is to make 3d simulations and animations so yes :D

  • just drop the fucking ball

  • is this mac??

  • How much is it?

  • you sound like jigsaw XD

  • The interesting thing is that Blender(it's Open-Source) had this some time ago(and still has)... and he is free, not like Cinema 4D

  • why does cinema 4d make you put an object under a cloner object to be able to give it dynamics?

  • @Que70

    It doesn't, you can use the traditional dynamics also. MoDynamics is designed to allow you to apply dynamics to cloned objects, thus you can only use it on a cloner.

  • @hobbes71002 yeah but what's the difference between the dynamics module and modynamics

  • @Que70

    As far as I know, the major difference is that MoDynamics is optimized to work with a large number of cloned objects. I recently had a scene with 20,000 cubes that were all being affected by MoDynamics. Calculation time was incredibly quick. Working with the Dynamics module, I don't know that it would even be possible for my computer to calculate that scene.

    Also, MoDyanimcs doesn't have soft-bodies. (To tell you the truth though, I use the Clothilde module for soft-bodies XD).

  • @hobbes71002 I see, I guess modynamics uses a newer way of calculating than the dynamics module, but I'm pretty sure there are some things the dynamics module can do that modynamics can't since Dynamics is an entire module and modynamics is just apart of MoGraph, do you thing Dynamics has some things that modynamics doesn't

  • @Que70

    Well, as I said, soft-body Dynamics. I haven't used MoDynamics a whole lot, but from what I can tell it has far less options than the Dynamics module insofar as the solver goes.

  • @hobbes71002 oh thankyou, but one more thing, doesn't modynamics have a soft body tag though, I would think that it would be for soft body dynamics.

  • @Que70

    I am using R11.514 and I cannot find a soft-body tag. If you know where there is one, though, I'd be happy to hear it!

  • @hobbes71002 hmm I guess not, One of my friends told me there was, but as I can see, I don't think so

  • where you download this version?

  • in your fuckin as

  • @Bluewhile yeah, i got it from there too lol

  • xD an marry x-mas ^^

  • @dios696 maxondotnet

  • buy it dude ...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more