conservapedia really is better than wikipedia!

[JMUDoc]

Conservapedia is one of the funniest sites I've seen this year. It's educational, too - apparently, not having a conservative bias is the same as having a liberal bias.

"God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist, whether in the physical universe or in the spiritual realm (Heaven)."

No intentional comedy has ever been this good:D.

[jamalaron]

Obama is a socialist. Because giving everyone free healthcare  and providing them with basic human needs is SO bad.

[theredviola]

I like how everyone who uses Conservapedia uses a camcorder to shoot their videos... shows you how much they really know.

[gregrutz]

conservapedia is like watching a Hovind video.

[Anon11674]

I must go out and troll Conservapedia. O.o

[Jh5kRadio]

I Lol'd.

[dragonsder]

Conservapedia is only good for the really stupid pages that make you lol

[jwh30385]

Conservapedia is the most ridiculous website I have ever encountered. I thought it was a parody until a couple of weeks ago..

[Kurzula5150]

Hahahaha fantastic

[Mattysmyth0593]

They call Intelligent design a "Theory" on conservapedia. that is just hillarious.

[upsilon054]

I checked the Conservapedia website today (12 October 2010), and the last sentence has been deleted. I'm absolutely no fan of Conservapedia, but it is quite possible that the last sentence was vandalism.

[cristoballs]

@upsilon054 i think the whole site is vandalism:-)

[upsilon054]

@cristoballs Agreed! And to think that other use Conservapedia as a reference! Ugh!! Y

[gphhawkins]

@cristoballs its all bs its right wing crazy batshittedness

[SylvanaForrester]

Who is ShockofGod anyway? And why is he one of the three people who have mysteriously subscribed to my YouTube channel? I don't even upload videos.

[baval5]

@SylvanaForrester most likely hes hoping you are a sheep, and seeing that he subscribed to you you will subscribe to him as a thank you.

[Powerslave138]

LMAO. subbed and liked

[bushonomics]

Hehe sweet :)

[BluJugganaut]

good stuff! lol

[TheAtomicist42]

No abbreviations- I laughed my ass off!

[pendulousphallus]

LMFAO! Surprise ending!

[pendulousphallus]

He only mentions Conservapedia when it mentions him.

[uxtalzon]

This video is awesome.

[cristoballs]

@uxtalzon about time you watched it:-P

[Texemosis]

what? sounds like a stupid website. I'm sorry, but a website that straight out shows it will be biased in favor of ANY political party, isn't worth putting in 100% of your trust. Please, he doesn't research homosexuality, lot of the shit he says is opposite of what the research studies show. Or maybe he uses bullshit sources from a joe shmuck with bad peer reviews and no citations.

[cristoballs]

@Texemosis do a google search on ken(neth) demyer and the demyer law. it pretty much confirms your last statement.

[iamaliberal]

@Texemosis stop sucking on bush's cock

[DragonRomer]

Ahahaha.

[themaiasaura]

the first time I went to conservapedia, I thought it was a parody site.

[cristoballs]

@themaiasaura it isn't???

[inmedx]

Well, guess we should all start using that now. Seems legit! ;D

[styrofoamheart]

SNAP!!!

[anthonzi]

lmfao

[hellshade2]

all your base are belong to us!

but you can keep shockofgod.....

[snipzor]

Huzzah for conservapedia and direct homophobia as well as user edited passive homophobia.

[cristoballs]

@snipzor define user passive homophobia:-P...

[snipzor]

@cristoballs 4chan silliness of course. I'd get into the whole socially acceptance of the type of insult, but whatever.

[cristoballs]

@snipzor yeah, i sensed the joke could be taken to be a little offensive, but i think most people realize that it wasn't an insult towards gays, but rather a stab at sog's obvious insecurities about homosexuality and his own "machismo". :-)

[geffel]

Perhaps there should be a Liberapedia as an antidote to Conservapedia.

Instead of it being a neutral, unbiased and heavily monitored source of information, like say, Wikipedia, Liberapedia could be an encyclopaedia with a heavy left wing bias.

Of course the trouble with left-wing 'bias' is that that it's mostly just actual fact.

[JerezJulio]

Not to mention that in Conservapedia Einstein laws of Relativity are a conspiracy to turn society in Gay, because Relativity does not really mean space and time are relative to the speed of Light, but what it really mean is that if everything is relative the Gay and straight are equivalent.

I am not kidding I heard this is Conservative Caucus round table the other day.

[redFISTofEUROPE]

LMAO

[Jermbot15]

Lets hear it for the user-edited encyclopedias.

[cristoballs]

@Jermbot15 HIP HIP HOORAY!!!

[1n354a]

hahaha awesome!

[chattiestspike2]

lol that is awesome. How did someone manage to do that?

[cristoballs]

@chattiestspike2 i know. you would think with the high level of fact-checking at conservapedia, something like that could never make it on their website.

[metalebd]

fucking looooooooooooool

[Strawedify]

I say if you want the greatest laugh of the day, go read their article about wikipedia:

"The project was initiated by two atheists: entrepreneur Jimmy Wales and philosophy professor Larry Sanger on January 15, 2001. An irony of internet history is that Jimmy Wales, despite being an atheist, refers to himself as Wikipedia's "spiritual leader".[5]"

But read on, you are gonna laugh ^-^

[KnightTemplar108]

Well he does say it's a choice.

[TraePalmer]

It'd be great if WikiTrust functioned on it -- all of the pages would be orange [unreputable] LOL !

[sbatou87]

Bwahah!

[TraePalmer]

He has to get that anger out somehow, I guess LOL ^_^

[cristoballs]

@TraePalmer he's getting something out:-P

[TraePalmer]

@cristoballs Yeah, and then likely moving to the center of the circle ^_^

[Vogter2100]

hahahaha

[mrx0066600]

I had no idea shockofmoron was a self hating homosexual... what? It says so in conservapedia, that place is just loaded with facts... for me to poop on...

[jussts]

Favorite quote from Conservapedia: "Unlike Christianity, which is supported by a large body of sound evidence, atheism has no proof and evidence supporting its ideology."

When you click on "supported by a large body of sound evidence" it takes you to their article on Christian apologetics.

Someone doesn't know what evidence means... or ideology.

[jussts]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!  That's fucking epic.

[hotlavatube]

LMAO. Oh man, if only they had posted pictures.

[soulinite]

Shock of Ted Haggard is more like it.

[Godlessons]

Nobody would be able to spam their YouTube channel so blatantly on Wikipedia.

[soulinite]

@Godlessons Here Here!

[AnnCunter]

Shock's old webpage had like 5 links on "how to fight your inner gay".

I suspect shock struggles with this daily.

[cristoballs]

@AnnCunter he does say he used to be an atheist, and constantly asserts that ALL atheists are gay. think he's trying to tell us something?

[mrx0066600]

@cristoballs

that he's really a self hating piece of shit?

[soulinite]

@AnnCunter "how to fight your inner gay" ROFL at fucking classic fundamentalism.

[cristoballs]

@soulinite i guess for shockofgod, the default position is down on all fours. if he denies ask him, "what proof and evidence can he provide that he is not a self-hating piece of crap?"

[HomoCyborgZombie]

epic

[cristoballs]

@HomoCyborgZombie thanks:-)

[liknital07]

man, thats awesome. When I searched for shock, I got the page "Essay: A YouTube atheist trying to pwn Christian shockofgod"

And pwning shock is like a cheetah (?) chasing a zebra on a motorcycle.

[cristoballs]

@liknital07 user: Conservative removed the post apparently. for those who don't know, Conservative used to be a contributor to wikipedia, but was banned from it for posting biased information on the site. His real name is ken demyer. do a search on the demyer. it's some funny stuff, and he's pretty much the only contributor to the atheism, evolution, and homosexuality sections of conservapedia, and explains why conservapedia is really crap.