RON PAUL 2012 If everyone really knew how jacked up our government is and the bad ass record RON PAUL has as a TEXAS CONGRESSMAN, 20 plus years of being the CONSTITUTION CHAMPION, His just the only real one running for us, everyone else is for the Establishment !!!! TEA PARTY, His has the most support from the TROOPS more than all of the other people including Obama put together,, So I hope the people listen to who they want for a COMMANDER AND CHIEF. Because He will bring the Troops home
Great video. Obama is the man, the so-called man with 'no experience' is the one who refused to take the country to the war that is costing us lives and money. We need some one with a strong sense of judgment. Does Hillary know what her YES to the war is costing us today. We want to change the way things are going in the white house, with people involved not only white house Insiders. Go Obama
actually, obama wasn't even in the senate at the time that they were voting for the war, but since he's been in the senate, clinton and obama's voting record have been nearly identical.
they've both voted to continue funding the war multiple times..
If Clinton is the one with experience then why her voting record in the senate is identical to Obama's, she should not feel comfortable voting like some1 without experience.
There is no doubt that if Obama was in the senate he would have voted against the war, his voice was not heard and he struggled to get his message heard, just like the rest of us on many issues. Clinton is good at playing politics but 1 thing we deserve is a sorry just like Edwards did.
i don't think you get the point. it's not about experience.
they both have voted for funding the war, but even though obama never got the chance to vote for or against the war, to continue backing the war financially is essentially the same as supporting the war.
voting for financing the war lets me know where obama stands on the war and gives me an idea on how he would have voted if he had had the chance to vote for the war like clinton did. like they say, actions speak louder than words.
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
Just watch interviews and video clips of the candidates and their responses to issues relative to the times. People forget that when the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2002, Bush's approval rating was around 66%-80%. It wasn't Obama's opposition to the war that impressed me as much as it was his reasons why and his entire analysis of the situation. It was so accurate that it was eerie! . . .
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious. You're saying that Obama can lie easier than Hillary Clinton . . . can lie easier than Hillary Clinton . . . EASIER THAN HILLARY CLINTON?!!! You along with many others have become disillusioned and brainwashed by the Hillary Clinton machine. The way to sift through the bull is to catch each candidate in their candid moments and to use the power of hindsight.
I'm glad they voted no! I'm glad they don't support the continued waste of our money. If bush is unwilling to bring the troops home, we have to cut off funding. If he wouldn't accept the previous plans, why should democrats accept this watered down plan?
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012 If everyone really knew how jacked up our government is and the bad ass record RON PAUL has as a TEXAS CONGRESSMAN, 20 plus years of being the CONSTITUTION CHAMPION, His just the only real one running for us, everyone else is for the Establishment !!!! TEA PARTY, His has the most support from the TROOPS more than all of the other people including Obama put together,, So I hope the people listen to who they want for a COMMANDER AND CHIEF. Because He will bring the Troops home
1we7the8people6 1 month ago
Senators who vote Nay on the Universal Health Care Bill have some explaining to do.
heartlessvietboy 1 year ago
obama 08
microdeluxe 4 years ago 2
Do you trust Hillary Clinton? Do you know her voting record in the US Senate? Check out my video on my youtube/Spective10 channel!
Spective10 4 years ago
i know her record is pretty much the same as obama's..
elnegrobembon 3 years ago
Great video. Obama is the man, the so-called man with 'no experience' is the one who refused to take the country to the war that is costing us lives and money. We need some one with a strong sense of judgment. Does Hillary know what her YES to the war is costing us today. We want to change the way things are going in the white house, with people involved not only white house Insiders. Go Obama
ckaprince 4 years ago
???
actually, obama wasn't even in the senate at the time that they were voting for the war, but since he's been in the senate, clinton and obama's voting record have been nearly identical.
they've both voted to continue funding the war multiple times..
elnegrobembon 3 years ago
If Clinton is the one with experience then why her voting record in the senate is identical to Obama's, she should not feel comfortable voting like some1 without experience.
There is no doubt that if Obama was in the senate he would have voted against the war, his voice was not heard and he struggled to get his message heard, just like the rest of us on many issues. Clinton is good at playing politics but 1 thing we deserve is a sorry just like Edwards did.
ckaprince 3 years ago
i don't think you get the point. it's not about experience.
they both have voted for funding the war, but even though obama never got the chance to vote for or against the war, to continue backing the war financially is essentially the same as supporting the war.
voting for financing the war lets me know where obama stands on the war and gives me an idea on how he would have voted if he had had the chance to vote for the war like clinton did. like they say, actions speak louder than words.
elnegrobembon 3 years ago
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
ckaprince 3 years ago
Don't confuse supporting the troops with supporting the war. the financial backing for the war isn't just for food and equipment.
he has voted against withdrawal, voted in favor of war profiteers, and has also voted for restrictions on habeas corpus.
That doesn't sound like supporting the troops or america, or being opposed to the war..
elnegrobembon 3 years ago
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
ckaprince 3 years ago
Now that the country is at war, Obama has no choice than supporting the troops, financially and morally. In the senate, if asked about sending food, money, equipments to the troops I think you don't expect Obama to say no just because he opposed the war from the beginning. These might be the votes you are referring to. When he is in office he will bring them bk home, check his site for a withdrawal plan. When Hillary got the 3am call she gave a wrong answer, don't forget she runing on experience
ckaprince 3 years ago
Just watch interviews and video clips of the candidates and their responses to issues relative to the times. People forget that when the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2002, Bush's approval rating was around 66%-80%. It wasn't Obama's opposition to the war that impressed me as much as it was his reasons why and his entire analysis of the situation. It was so accurate that it was eerie! . . .
truthspeaks84 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hillary clinton has progressive voting record than mr Obama but Obama can lie easily and become more libral.
Vote Hillary Clinton in 2008!
ghill2008 4 years ago
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious. You're saying that Obama can lie easier than Hillary Clinton . . . can lie easier than Hillary Clinton . . . EASIER THAN HILLARY CLINTON?!!! You along with many others have become disillusioned and brainwashed by the Hillary Clinton machine. The way to sift through the bull is to catch each candidate in their candid moments and to use the power of hindsight.
truthspeaks84 4 years ago
I'm glad they voted no! I'm glad they don't support the continued waste of our money. If bush is unwilling to bring the troops home, we have to cut off funding. If he wouldn't accept the previous plans, why should democrats accept this watered down plan?
themightylex 4 years ago 2