I think Beck is a white Supremacist. He gives them an open platform on his show. Racists don't deserve platforms. They need to be locked up in the projects for a couple weeks.
What the... based on what? And what racists has he had on his show?
You really need to stop throwing the race card so irresponsibly.
And by the way... I tried to post a bunch of URLs to images of black people attending and speaking or performing at Tea Parties. Maybe YouTube blocks posting URLs? Wasn't that hard to find them. This kind of refutes your allegation of everyone at Tea Parties being white.
Right. Thanks for proving my point with the Glenn Beck remark. He is indeed a Libertarian. What don't you like about Glenn Beck? The fact that he exposed Marxists and Communists in the Obama administration?
You see, there is no average American. You Republicans don't get it. The average American now has mixed ancestries, color, cultures. Most Repubs think the average American is (1) White (2) Male (3) Has his gun ready (4) Pays too much in taxes (5) Wants to have sex with Sarah Palin.......sounds like last years face of the Republican Party
Yes there is. You Liberals are in denial about this. By the way... I am not a Republican. Almost ALL Americans have mixed ancestries... confirming my point. Wouldn't this trait then be "typical" for Americans? "Average American" has nothing to do with race, gender, 2nd Amendment rights , or taxes. LIBERALS are the ones obsessed with race, gender, erradicating 2nd Ammendment rights, raising taxes and having sex.
You need to grow up. You seem incapable of having a substantive discussion about issues. All you can do is call Republicans racists, sexists, homophobic, gun toting, hormones who don't want to pay their taxes. That is sophomoric and unintelligent of you to say that. We are ALL colors, both genders, believe in the WHOLE Constitution (not just the parts we like, so yes... the 2nd Amendment), and we don't like giving half our incomes to people who refuse to earn their own living.
Yes...WE are all colors, not Republicans. You see the tea parties. Everyone is WHITE....maybe you didn't hear that WHITE. You wouldn't know what the 2nd amendment was if it hit you in the face....
Actually... Republicans are all colors too. Stop promoting lies. YOU are a RACIST. I saw the Tea Parties and I saw AMERICANS!!! YOU are the noticing SKIN COLOR.
Really? I wouldn't know what the 2nd Amendment is? Care to explain what the hell that is supposed to me? I don't know what the right to keep and bear arms is? OK... let me know when you aren't high anymore.
You saw Americans, but you didn't see any blacks. You say I am noticing skin color. Did you see any blacks there ? Why do you think thre weren't any there ? I don't promote lies. I leave that to Sarah Palin and her death panels. Yes...you have the right to bear arms, but there should be common sense restrictions. You guys fight common sense restrictions.
The "death panels" will exist if healthcare gets passed.
You also said I didn't know what the 2nd Amendment was, which was also a lie. I proved you wrong. Now you want to push past this and discuss "common sense restrictions"??? There aren't any. Get over it. How about this for a "common sense restriction"... Murder someone and we execute you! Oh wait... the Left is always fighting that one... oops!
Sure it is. You clearly don't know much about Christianity. God actually commanded us to execute for certain sins.
Not really. Cant' think of any. If there aren't any in the Constitution... then maybe there shouldn't be any?
Besides... we already have many restrictions in place anyway. You have to be licensed to have a gun. Background checks. Gun registration. No automatics. Some states have even stricter statues on gun ownership than the federal laws.
Surely you know even less, because Christ never sanctioned death for any sin........and you can show me where he did if you know anything about Christianity!
Come on, man... he ALLOWED himself to be executed. Why would he allow himself to be executed if it was wrong to execute?
Yes, he was... and yes he did. Try reading Leviticus, dude. There are some pretty surprising grounds for being executed in the Bible. Adultery, homosexuality... execution. Sorry man. It's the brutal reality.
.....when she was running for Governor of Alaska she promised to give her all, to do her best. Then she quits when she gets a whiff of money from a book deal ? Looks like she sold out to me. Even if things just got too hard, this was Alaska politics. How could she ever hope to be able to handle politics on a national level ?
I think she DID do her all and give her best. She didn't quit for her book. She resigned because bogus ethics charge after bogus ethics charge was being brought against her by Leftist activist groups and her staff was spending 24/7 having to fight them. She couldn't do her job effectively anymore, so she unselfishly stepped down for the GOOD OF ALASKA. Looks to me like she was keeping her promise to Alaskans like few politicians would be willing to do!
How do you know she didn't quit because of the book ? You can't be certain. Also, a few of those bogus ethics charges were legitimate. Sarah also used these very same ethics laws to combat political foes and get Republican legislators record fines. These laws helped her get her "Reformer" tag and elected Governor. Now, when they are used against her, she cries foul. The left sees her as a hypocrite. Like preaching abstinence when you and your daughter conceive children out of wedlock.
Because this is what she said and... it totally makes sense. How do YOU know DEFINITIVELY that she DID quit because of her book? You don't.
Ethics laws exist for a reason. There is a time and place to use them: against REAL corruption. Not just to attack someone because you disagree with them.
We don't CARE what the Left thinks of her. Hypocrisy ABOUNDS in your party. You claim to love feminism, but then the Left savages Palin because she is not liberal. Nice. Just one example of many.
I don't know definitely if she quit for sure cause of the book....but she is a quitter. She may have quit because she started believing her own hype and started thinking she was a rockstar and Alaskan politics wasn't self serving enough anymore, which means she's not an ordinary person anymore.
Good for you for admitting this. Now... since you admit you don't know, perhaps you shouldn't make such accusations?
Let those who support Sarah decide what they think her motives are. You clearly don't, which is fine, but try being responsible and just discuss the issues and stop making ad hominem attacks on her. Let's discuss the issues more and attack those we disagree with less. Cool?
How is Palin advocating abstinence hypocrisy on Palin's part just because her daughter had a child out of wedlock??? Palin and her daughter are two completely separate individuals. Her daughter made a poor choice despite the values her parents taught her. Children do this all the time. How does her daughter's actions make Palin herself a hypocrite? Try some intellectual honestly, will ya?
......you mean proof she's a quitter. Jeez, that Republican adultering Governor from South Carolina won't even quit. She also quit her post on the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Council after being appointed by the Governor after a short stint.
No, proof of your stupid allegation that "she eloped cause she was pregnant also." How does this make any sense? Didn't she just have a baby like a year or so ago? Doesn't she have like 4 or 5 kids? Now for some reason she has to hide her pregnancies??? You are not making any sense. Why don't you go comment on a topic you are more qualified on... like Britney Spears?
Let me see......she was married on 8/29/88. Her Oxycontin snorting son Track was born on 4/20/89. Wow.....not even 8 months......hhhmmmmm You still think she eloped cause her daddy didn't have the money ? Wake up." How does this make any sense?" You tell me. Take your blinders off. She probably isn't the great mom you think she is either. I'm almost certain Bristol has been raising the younger children.
Wow... now we are actually taking a journey back to 1988??? What a LOSER you are. YOU are the one that needs to wake up from your blind seething hate.
Just say you disagree with Palin and walk away. You are making yourself look stupid engaging in these absurd ad hominem attacks on Palin and Conservatives. You aren't helping your cause. You are out of control.
....why is it so hard for you to believe that Todd was tagging her before they were married, or engaged, she found out she was pregnant, told him, and they eloped ?
Actually... it's not so hard for me to believe. If I was Todd, I probably would have tried to nail her too... but you are seriously trying to discredit her based on them possibly having pre-marital sex in 1988??? Do you have any idea how absurd you sound? I don't know how to make it any more clear.... I don't CARE if they were getting it on in '88. I can't believe anyone WOULD care about this!! THAT is my point.
All I am saying is it is kind of hypocritical to try to influence others into abstinence only programs when you yourself couldn't do it. And it didn't work for your daughter. Doesn't matter when it happened. ALSO........I don't hate Sarah. I'd like to bend her over a fence and tear that up! She's cute. I don't want her representing the country though and I don't want her to talk after I bend her over either cause her voice irritates me like nails on chalkboard!
Dude... 1988. That's all I'm saying. Did you not do anything stupid when you were in highschool or college, learn from it and then encourage others not to make the same mistakes? This would make you a hypocrite? Can't go with you on that logic.
being a hypocrite is saying one thing and doing another. Like Ted Haggard preaching against gays and then snorting meth off a male prostitutes ass. Like Gov. Sanford preaching family values and getting caught lying about camping while he was banging his Argentinian soulmate........
I can't help but notice you don't have any LIBERALS on that cute list of hypocrites of yours. Like Rangle writing the tax code and then not paying his? Like Al Gore preaching about Global Warming and then touring on a fuel guzzling private jet? See... it's on both sides.
OK... well, you sure ad hominem attack her a LOT for someone who doesn't hate her.
I will definitely agree with you that she is totally hot. She is a sharp lady and I lover her energy and how relatable she is. To each their own. At least we can both agree she is a cutie. You and I probably agree on even more than this if we got to know each other. We both want what is best for this country. We simply disagree on the specifics, right?
We just don't understand why the right treats her like a rockstar.......the left sees her for what she really was.......a desperate attempt to try to turn around an election.
The Republicans have lots of exciting people to choose from. Mitch Daniels, Mike Pence, Michelle Bauchmen, Bobby Jindahl, and MANY more. I mean... who does the LEFT have? They are giving us their best now. Obama is supposed to be AMAZING us with his diplomacy and persuasion skills. What happened???
What a shock that a list of conservatives be uninspiring to a liberal.
Why not? She represents something that few politicians on EITHER side represent these days: Average Americans. They relate to her, and the Left is TOTALLY freaked out by this.
The Right doesn't want AMERICA to fail, just the Left. Failure on the Left means no socialized healthcare, no "necessarily skyrocketing" fuel and utility prices (Obama's words) and no Marxists in the White House. Yes... we want THIS to fail.
I don't think she represents average Americans. What is the average American ? White, overweight and undereducated. Thats who I see at the tea parties and conventions. So why don't you tell me what an average American is......and the left isn't as freaked out about her as you think. After all. she helped Obama win the election!
OK, probably because you are liberal, but fine. Average Americans are hard working, have children, raise families, have jobs, go to church, take kids to soccer (or hockey), are self-made, etc.
Palin is not overweight or uneducated. And that is not all you see at Tea Parties. Why do you have to hate people because they believe in smaller government and lower taxes??? That is absurd. Do you hate the Founding Fathers too? That's what they believed in.
Oh yes they are. The Left is TOTALLY freaked out about her. Palin didn't help Obama win. McCain did. Palin is going to help Obama LOSE in 2012, whether she runs or not. That is a promise.
You are good at yelling "Liberal" at people, the right has done a good job on you. Name calling is what people do when they have no real argument.
Sara is another incompitant politician brought to us by the right. There are some of us who don't want the right making the decisions on who are leaders should be, because they are not sane enough to make an educated decision. As they did with Bush.
Sara appeals to "average Americans" and thus is what? As dumb as they are?
Why are Liberals so afraid of being called Liberals? It isn't name calling. It is an identifier. If I meet someone from Britain and I call them British... would I be calling them names??? Of course not. Don't be dumb.
Palin is not incompetent. You who say she is are completely intellectually dishonest. DISAGREE with her all you want, but to hate her or call her incompetent (whether they spell it correctly or not) is simply sophmoric.
...I never said she was incompetent. That was the other guy. She can read a speech and draw a crowd. That means the RNC will use her to campaign for others. FundraisingIng makes her valuable to the Repubs. She will never win elected office again in my opinion, however.
You are ALL taking shots at Palin's competence and intelligence.
She can also deliver a great unscripted speach and inspire thousands of Americans with them. They may use her for fundraising, if Palin stays with the Republican party. She may not. You may be right... but we shall all see about whether she is ever elected to anything ever again. Hell, she may never even run for office again.
Well, that's debatable. But Liberals demonize Conservatives and Libertarians (genius of the Left?), and I would be proud to be called either. Accept who you are, man.
Yes, it does. I get that Palin makes no sense to you... but say that. Don't call her stupid or incompetent. Just say you disagree with her.
No worries on the spelling. It's "demonized" in case you are interested, but I mispell things too. Not a problem.
So... Americans who disagree with you are automatically dumber than you? Very tolerant of you. Wait... isn't that being a "bigot"? Interesting.
You are playing the elitist card. All Americans who don't agree with your "superior intelligence" are just dumb. Ironic since your spelling, punctuation use and grammar are atrocious.
Elitist is not synonymous with "rich". Elitist means you believe your beliefs and opinions are vastly superior to everyone else's, therefore theirs are irrelevant.
Elitism: The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
You believe that since conservatives are dumber than you that their opinions should be disregarded. Nice democracy there!
How about ANYONE who thinks that anyone who does not agree with them is just stupid, therefore their opinion doesn't matter? The word ELITIST doesn't necessarily have to have anything to do with money. Did you actually READ the definition above? Intellect? Social Status?
Ah... so can you name anyway who is brainwashed and not dumb? Come on. Try some intellectual honesty. Not as hard as it may seem. You can do it.
I believe in fiscal conservatism, but not only when the opposition is in. like you guys. The Repubs forget it wasn't too long ago they were the ones adding trillions to the national debt. Back then they said it's no problem. Now to prevent a depression, all of the sudden it's a huge problem.
If you support Obama's healthcare, cap and trade, and the rest of his taxpayer funded social programs... then you are not a "fiscal conservative". If you don't support these things, then you and I have something in common.
Yes, many Republicans are guilty of increasing government and spending. I absolutely agree with you... but I am not a Republican. I am a Libertarian/Conservative. Palin is MUCH better than most Republicans and ALL Democrats about wasteful spending.
So....you are a registered Libertarian ? I don't support cap and trade. I didn't think it would ever go through either. Obama doesn't have a healthcare plan. Congress is working on that one. Repubs think we should keep healthcare the way it is. Just let insurance companies go over state lines and limit lawsuit amounts. Not much of a plan. I think healthcare should be made available to rich and poor.
I am actually registered as a Republican, but have considered on and off changing my registration for several years. Haven't because doing so wouldn't allow me to vote in the primary.
Good. Cap and Trade would skyrocket our energy prices. You are right about OBama himself not having a specific Heatlhcare plan, but he supports the bad ones. No, Republicans want reform too, just a different kind... but you never hear about this in the media.
Healthcare IS available to the rich and the poor now. No, not everyone can afford it, but the liberal plan is for the ones who CAN afford it pay for those who CAN'T. This does nothing to reduce prices. We need to stop giving incentives to biz to provide benefits, put that money in the workers paycheck, give the incentive to the employee instead of the biz, then let everyone shop for healthcare like they do anything else... then prices will PLUMET and be VASTLY more affordable for ALL of us!!!
They are part of the elite, but it's part of the name calling they are so good at.
Bush, having multiple degrees from Harvard, Yale, and Andover accuses John Kerry of being an elitist. Both belonged to the Skull and bones.
Difference between the Bush administration and Kerry was that Kerry actually went to Viet Nam and really was a hero. The chicken hawks had to make him into a coward. That's why I'll never identify myself with the right.
Because unlike Obama, Biden, Clinton, McCain, Snow, Frank, Dodd, Pelosi, Rangle, Reid, and almost all of the rest, she IS NOT WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT!!! We want a regular American with REAL American values in office! We want someone who gets what it means to live in America and isn't out of touch or serving special interests! Palin resonates with the American people because we are tired from the status quo from both parties!!
I know... Me too. I shot that vid at like 7:30 this morning and she wasn't arriving until roughly 11 hours later!!! I couldn't go because I had to go to work.
I think Beck is a white Supremacist. He gives them an open platform on his show. Racists don't deserve platforms. They need to be locked up in the projects for a couple weeks.
publiknme 2 years ago
What the... based on what? And what racists has he had on his show?
You really need to stop throwing the race card so irresponsibly.
And by the way... I tried to post a bunch of URLs to images of black people attending and speaking or performing at Tea Parties. Maybe YouTube blocks posting URLs? Wasn't that hard to find them. This kind of refutes your allegation of everyone at Tea Parties being white.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Michael Hill, founder a president of the League of the South
publiknme 2 years ago
Right. Thanks for proving my point with the Glenn Beck remark. He is indeed a Libertarian. What don't you like about Glenn Beck? The fact that he exposed Marxists and Communists in the Obama administration?
nieten7642 2 years ago
No, Reagan wasn't an elitist. Not in the least. Elitism is an attitude, not wealth or celebrity. You should really study the meaning of this word.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Glenn Beck isn't a Libertarian, he's a piece of shit
publiknme 2 years ago
Wasn't Ronald Reagan the epitome of Hollywood elitists ?
publiknme 2 years ago
You see, there is no average American. You Republicans don't get it. The average American now has mixed ancestries, color, cultures. Most Repubs think the average American is (1) White (2) Male (3) Has his gun ready (4) Pays too much in taxes (5) Wants to have sex with Sarah Palin.......sounds like last years face of the Republican Party
you guessed it...........Joe the Plumber!
publiknme 2 years ago
Yes there is. You Liberals are in denial about this. By the way... I am not a Republican. Almost ALL Americans have mixed ancestries... confirming my point. Wouldn't this trait then be "typical" for Americans? "Average American" has nothing to do with race, gender, 2nd Amendment rights , or taxes. LIBERALS are the ones obsessed with race, gender, erradicating 2nd Ammendment rights, raising taxes and having sex.
nieten7642 2 years ago
You need to grow up. You seem incapable of having a substantive discussion about issues. All you can do is call Republicans racists, sexists, homophobic, gun toting, hormones who don't want to pay their taxes. That is sophomoric and unintelligent of you to say that. We are ALL colors, both genders, believe in the WHOLE Constitution (not just the parts we like, so yes... the 2nd Amendment), and we don't like giving half our incomes to people who refuse to earn their own living.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Yes...WE are all colors, not Republicans. You see the tea parties. Everyone is WHITE....maybe you didn't hear that WHITE. You wouldn't know what the 2nd amendment was if it hit you in the face....
publiknme 2 years ago
Actually... Republicans are all colors too. Stop promoting lies. YOU are a RACIST. I saw the Tea Parties and I saw AMERICANS!!! YOU are the noticing SKIN COLOR.
Really? I wouldn't know what the 2nd Amendment is? Care to explain what the hell that is supposed to me? I don't know what the right to keep and bear arms is? OK... let me know when you aren't high anymore.
nieten7642 2 years ago
You saw Americans, but you didn't see any blacks. You say I am noticing skin color. Did you see any blacks there ? Why do you think thre weren't any there ? I don't promote lies. I leave that to Sarah Palin and her death panels. Yes...you have the right to bear arms, but there should be common sense restrictions. You guys fight common sense restrictions.
publiknme 2 years ago
Yes you do. I've just proven it.
The "death panels" will exist if healthcare gets passed.
You also said I didn't know what the 2nd Amendment was, which was also a lie. I proved you wrong. Now you want to push past this and discuss "common sense restrictions"??? There aren't any. Get over it. How about this for a "common sense restriction"... Murder someone and we execute you! Oh wait... the Left is always fighting that one... oops!
nieten7642 2 years ago
...executing isn't very Christian-like is it ? You don't think their should be any gun restrictions whatsoever ?
publiknme 2 years ago
Sure it is. You clearly don't know much about Christianity. God actually commanded us to execute for certain sins.
Not really. Cant' think of any. If there aren't any in the Constitution... then maybe there shouldn't be any?
Besides... we already have many restrictions in place anyway. You have to be licensed to have a gun. Background checks. Gun registration. No automatics. Some states have even stricter statues on gun ownership than the federal laws.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Surely you know even less, because Christ never sanctioned death for any sin........and you can show me where he did if you know anything about Christianity!
publiknme 2 years ago
Christ himself DIED for our sins! He himself was EXECUTED so we would not have to pay the ultimate price ourselves. Are you kidding me???
nieten7642 2 years ago
....just cause he was executed doesn't mean he sanctioned it for others......that is ludicrous
wasn't he forgiving of sins, any kind of sin ? No way Christ would have condoned capital punishment and no way to argue that.
publiknme 2 years ago
Come on, man... he ALLOWED himself to be executed. Why would he allow himself to be executed if it was wrong to execute?
Yes, he was... and yes he did. Try reading Leviticus, dude. There are some pretty surprising grounds for being executed in the Bible. Adultery, homosexuality... execution. Sorry man. It's the brutal reality.
nieten7642 2 years ago
yo...Leviticus isn't Christ is it ? He didn't allow himself to be executed cause he thought it was OK. He had made up his mind to die for your sins.
publiknme 2 years ago
Uh, yes it is. The entire Bible is Christ. He made up his mind to die for my sins... via execution. Are we seriously arguing this?
nieten7642 2 years ago
And yes, Todd Palin is a lucky man... but I am a lucky many myself. I have MY OWN beautiful wife.
Do you get much action living in your parents basement lurking online doing Obama's bidding? No, I didn't think so.
nieten7642 2 years ago
hmmm, she bailed on Alaskans...she bailed on Noblesville, glad I wasn't there
swtmol 2 years ago
She didn't bail on Alaskans or Hoosiers. I'm glad you weren't here either.
nieten7642 2 years ago
.....when she was running for Governor of Alaska she promised to give her all, to do her best. Then she quits when she gets a whiff of money from a book deal ? Looks like she sold out to me. Even if things just got too hard, this was Alaska politics. How could she ever hope to be able to handle politics on a national level ?
publiknme 2 years ago
I think she DID do her all and give her best. She didn't quit for her book. She resigned because bogus ethics charge after bogus ethics charge was being brought against her by Leftist activist groups and her staff was spending 24/7 having to fight them. She couldn't do her job effectively anymore, so she unselfishly stepped down for the GOOD OF ALASKA. Looks to me like she was keeping her promise to Alaskans like few politicians would be willing to do!
nieten7642 2 years ago
How do you know she didn't quit because of the book ? You can't be certain. Also, a few of those bogus ethics charges were legitimate. Sarah also used these very same ethics laws to combat political foes and get Republican legislators record fines. These laws helped her get her "Reformer" tag and elected Governor. Now, when they are used against her, she cries foul. The left sees her as a hypocrite. Like preaching abstinence when you and your daughter conceive children out of wedlock.
publiknme 2 years ago
Because this is what she said and... it totally makes sense. How do YOU know DEFINITIVELY that she DID quit because of her book? You don't.
Ethics laws exist for a reason. There is a time and place to use them: against REAL corruption. Not just to attack someone because you disagree with them.
We don't CARE what the Left thinks of her. Hypocrisy ABOUNDS in your party. You claim to love feminism, but then the Left savages Palin because she is not liberal. Nice. Just one example of many.
nieten7642 2 years ago
I don't know definitely if she quit for sure cause of the book....but she is a quitter. She may have quit because she started believing her own hype and started thinking she was a rockstar and Alaskan politics wasn't self serving enough anymore, which means she's not an ordinary person anymore.
publiknme 2 years ago
Good for you for admitting this. Now... since you admit you don't know, perhaps you shouldn't make such accusations?
Let those who support Sarah decide what they think her motives are. You clearly don't, which is fine, but try being responsible and just discuss the issues and stop making ad hominem attacks on her. Let's discuss the issues more and attack those we disagree with less. Cool?
nieten7642 2 years ago
How is Palin advocating abstinence hypocrisy on Palin's part just because her daughter had a child out of wedlock??? Palin and her daughter are two completely separate individuals. Her daughter made a poor choice despite the values her parents taught her. Children do this all the time. How does her daughter's actions make Palin herself a hypocrite? Try some intellectual honestly, will ya?
nieten7642 2 years ago
I believe Palin eloped cause she was pregnant also. They are proof that abstinence only doesn't work and never will.
publiknme 2 years ago
OK, back to YOUR standard... where is your proof of that allegation?
No, there isn't... but at least you FINALLY address an issue for a change instead of attacking Palin personally. It's an improvement, I guess.
nieten7642 2 years ago
......you mean proof she's a quitter. Jeez, that Republican adultering Governor from South Carolina won't even quit. She also quit her post on the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Council after being appointed by the Governor after a short stint.
publiknme 2 years ago
No, proof of your stupid allegation that "she eloped cause she was pregnant also." How does this make any sense? Didn't she just have a baby like a year or so ago? Doesn't she have like 4 or 5 kids? Now for some reason she has to hide her pregnancies??? You are not making any sense. Why don't you go comment on a topic you are more qualified on... like Britney Spears?
nieten7642 2 years ago
Let me see......she was married on 8/29/88. Her Oxycontin snorting son Track was born on 4/20/89. Wow.....not even 8 months......hhhmmmmm You still think she eloped cause her daddy didn't have the money ? Wake up." How does this make any sense?" You tell me. Take your blinders off. She probably isn't the great mom you think she is either. I'm almost certain Bristol has been raising the younger children.
publiknme 2 years ago
Wow... now we are actually taking a journey back to 1988??? What a LOSER you are. YOU are the one that needs to wake up from your blind seething hate.
Just say you disagree with Palin and walk away. You are making yourself look stupid engaging in these absurd ad hominem attacks on Palin and Conservatives. You aren't helping your cause. You are out of control.
nieten7642 2 years ago
...I prove to you Palin and her daughter are sluts and you call me a loser ? That's rich.
publiknme 2 years ago
No you didn't. You didn't PROVE anything of the kind... but you still alledge it. So yes... that makes you a loser.
nieten7642 2 years ago
....why is it so hard for you to believe that Todd was tagging her before they were married, or engaged, she found out she was pregnant, told him, and they eloped ?
Why is that so hard for you to believe ?
publiknme 2 years ago
Actually... it's not so hard for me to believe. If I was Todd, I probably would have tried to nail her too... but you are seriously trying to discredit her based on them possibly having pre-marital sex in 1988??? Do you have any idea how absurd you sound? I don't know how to make it any more clear.... I don't CARE if they were getting it on in '88. I can't believe anyone WOULD care about this!! THAT is my point.
nieten7642 2 years ago
All I am saying is it is kind of hypocritical to try to influence others into abstinence only programs when you yourself couldn't do it. And it didn't work for your daughter. Doesn't matter when it happened. ALSO........I don't hate Sarah. I'd like to bend her over a fence and tear that up! She's cute. I don't want her representing the country though and I don't want her to talk after I bend her over either cause her voice irritates me like nails on chalkboard!
publiknme 2 years ago
Dude... 1988. That's all I'm saying. Did you not do anything stupid when you were in highschool or college, learn from it and then encourage others not to make the same mistakes? This would make you a hypocrite? Can't go with you on that logic.
nieten7642 2 years ago
being a hypocrite is saying one thing and doing another. Like Ted Haggard preaching against gays and then snorting meth off a male prostitutes ass. Like Gov. Sanford preaching family values and getting caught lying about camping while he was banging his Argentinian soulmate........
publiknme 2 years ago
I can't help but notice you don't have any LIBERALS on that cute list of hypocrites of yours. Like Rangle writing the tax code and then not paying his? Like Al Gore preaching about Global Warming and then touring on a fuel guzzling private jet? See... it's on both sides.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Rangel is a hypocrite. He should be put out to pasture. Same with Sen. Byrd, he's a racist.
publiknme 2 years ago
Good for you! I am proud of you! See? We both agree that there is hypocrisy on both sides. And Al Gore and his big jet? And eating meat?
nieten7642 2 years ago
OK... well, you sure ad hominem attack her a LOT for someone who doesn't hate her.
I will definitely agree with you that she is totally hot. She is a sharp lady and I lover her energy and how relatable she is. To each their own. At least we can both agree she is a cutie. You and I probably agree on even more than this if we got to know each other. We both want what is best for this country. We simply disagree on the specifics, right?
nieten7642 2 years ago
We just don't understand why the right treats her like a rockstar.......the left sees her for what she really was.......a desperate attempt to try to turn around an election.
publiknme 2 years ago
Because they have no one else and they never thought to look further.
vidguy007 2 years ago
The Republicans have lots of exciting people to choose from. Mitch Daniels, Mike Pence, Michelle Bauchmen, Bobby Jindahl, and MANY more. I mean... who does the LEFT have? They are giving us their best now. Obama is supposed to be AMAZING us with his diplomacy and persuasion skills. What happened???
nieten7642 2 years ago
Your most exciting candidate, Mitt Romney is discriminated against by his own party cause he's a mormon. I think that pretty much says it all.
publiknme 2 years ago
Bobby Jindahl, exciting? A pretty uninspiring list, but if you say so, ok.
If there is such a dynamic choice, why the support for Sara Palin?
Obama isn't as bad as the Republicans keep hammering us on, but that's what the Republicans do. Hard to believe they want the US to be successful.
You don't have to look far to find prominent spokesmen on the right to say they want failure.
With Bush, that's what we got. Failure. Guess the right hates the US.
vidguy007 2 years ago
What a shock that a list of conservatives be uninspiring to a liberal.
Why not? She represents something that few politicians on EITHER side represent these days: Average Americans. They relate to her, and the Left is TOTALLY freaked out by this.
The Right doesn't want AMERICA to fail, just the Left. Failure on the Left means no socialized healthcare, no "necessarily skyrocketing" fuel and utility prices (Obama's words) and no Marxists in the White House. Yes... we want THIS to fail.
nieten7642 2 years ago
I don't think she represents average Americans. What is the average American ? White, overweight and undereducated. Thats who I see at the tea parties and conventions. So why don't you tell me what an average American is......and the left isn't as freaked out about her as you think. After all. she helped Obama win the election!
publiknme 2 years ago
OK, probably because you are liberal, but fine. Average Americans are hard working, have children, raise families, have jobs, go to church, take kids to soccer (or hockey), are self-made, etc.
Palin is not overweight or uneducated. And that is not all you see at Tea Parties. Why do you have to hate people because they believe in smaller government and lower taxes??? That is absurd. Do you hate the Founding Fathers too? That's what they believed in.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Oh yes they are. The Left is TOTALLY freaked out about her. Palin didn't help Obama win. McCain did. Palin is going to help Obama LOSE in 2012, whether she runs or not. That is a promise.
nieten7642 2 years ago
You are good at yelling "Liberal" at people, the right has done a good job on you. Name calling is what people do when they have no real argument.
Sara is another incompitant politician brought to us by the right. There are some of us who don't want the right making the decisions on who are leaders should be, because they are not sane enough to make an educated decision. As they did with Bush.
Sara appeals to "average Americans" and thus is what? As dumb as they are?
vidguy007 2 years ago
Why are Liberals so afraid of being called Liberals? It isn't name calling. It is an identifier. If I meet someone from Britain and I call them British... would I be calling them names??? Of course not. Don't be dumb.
Palin is not incompetent. You who say she is are completely intellectually dishonest. DISAGREE with her all you want, but to hate her or call her incompetent (whether they spell it correctly or not) is simply sophmoric.
The Right makes LOTS more sense than the Left.
nieten7642 2 years ago
...I never said she was incompetent. That was the other guy. She can read a speech and draw a crowd. That means the RNC will use her to campaign for others. FundraisingIng makes her valuable to the Repubs. She will never win elected office again in my opinion, however.
publiknme 2 years ago
You are ALL taking shots at Palin's competence and intelligence.
She can also deliver a great unscripted speach and inspire thousands of Americans with them. They may use her for fundraising, if Palin stays with the Republican party. She may not. You may be right... but we shall all see about whether she is ever elected to anything ever again. Hell, she may never even run for office again.
nieten7642 2 years ago
I notice she uses a teleprompter. Probably all public speakers do, but it's a talking point for the right when Obama does it.
I agree with you, she probably will never win a major election again.
vidguy007 2 years ago
Nothing wrong with being a liberal, it's the label "Liberal" which has been deamonized by the right.
I can't help but notice that the term is used as a negative. The genius of the right.
The right makes sense to you, great, Sara Palin makes no sense to me. That's how life works.
"Deamonized" isn't in the dictionary and Youtube has no spell check. Sorry if my spelling isn't up to some people's standards.
vidguy007 2 years ago
Well, that's debatable. But Liberals demonize Conservatives and Libertarians (genius of the Left?), and I would be proud to be called either. Accept who you are, man.
Yes, it does. I get that Palin makes no sense to you... but say that. Don't call her stupid or incompetent. Just say you disagree with her.
No worries on the spelling. It's "demonized" in case you are interested, but I mispell things too. Not a problem.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Conservatives probably demoize Libertarians more. Remember how McCain & Romney were actually laughing at Ron Paiul ? They think he's a joke.
publiknme 2 years ago
Yeah... I don't think that is really true. I am Libertarian, but I thought Ron Paul's foreign policy was a bit of a joke.
Glenn Beck is Libertarian, but the Left demonizes him all the time.
The Tea Party is a pretty Libertarian movement, but the Left mocks them all the time too.
nieten7642 2 years ago
So... Americans who disagree with you are automatically dumber than you? Very tolerant of you. Wait... isn't that being a "bigot"? Interesting.
You are playing the elitist card. All Americans who don't agree with your "superior intelligence" are just dumb. Ironic since your spelling, punctuation use and grammar are atrocious.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Elitist....I love that....here where I live, the rich elitists are all Republicans!
publiknme 2 years ago
Elitist is not synonymous with "rich". Elitist means you believe your beliefs and opinions are vastly superior to everyone else's, therefore theirs are irrelevant.
Elitism: The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
You believe that since conservatives are dumber than you that their opinions should be disregarded. Nice democracy there!
nieten7642 2 years ago
Name me some POOR elitists. I never said conservatives are dumb. Just easily brainwashed by cable TV news and catchy slogans.
publiknme 2 years ago
How about ANYONE who thinks that anyone who does not agree with them is just stupid, therefore their opinion doesn't matter? The word ELITIST doesn't necessarily have to have anything to do with money. Did you actually READ the definition above? Intellect? Social Status?
Ah... so can you name anyway who is brainwashed and not dumb? Come on. Try some intellectual honesty. Not as hard as it may seem. You can do it.
nieten7642 2 years ago
I believe in fiscal conservatism, but not only when the opposition is in. like you guys. The Repubs forget it wasn't too long ago they were the ones adding trillions to the national debt. Back then they said it's no problem. Now to prevent a depression, all of the sudden it's a huge problem.
publiknme 2 years ago
If you support Obama's healthcare, cap and trade, and the rest of his taxpayer funded social programs... then you are not a "fiscal conservative". If you don't support these things, then you and I have something in common.
Yes, many Republicans are guilty of increasing government and spending. I absolutely agree with you... but I am not a Republican. I am a Libertarian/Conservative. Palin is MUCH better than most Republicans and ALL Democrats about wasteful spending.
nieten7642 2 years ago
So....you are a registered Libertarian ? I don't support cap and trade. I didn't think it would ever go through either. Obama doesn't have a healthcare plan. Congress is working on that one. Repubs think we should keep healthcare the way it is. Just let insurance companies go over state lines and limit lawsuit amounts. Not much of a plan. I think healthcare should be made available to rich and poor.
publiknme 2 years ago
I am actually registered as a Republican, but have considered on and off changing my registration for several years. Haven't because doing so wouldn't allow me to vote in the primary.
Good. Cap and Trade would skyrocket our energy prices. You are right about OBama himself not having a specific Heatlhcare plan, but he supports the bad ones. No, Republicans want reform too, just a different kind... but you never hear about this in the media.
nieten7642 2 years ago
Healthcare IS available to the rich and the poor now. No, not everyone can afford it, but the liberal plan is for the ones who CAN afford it pay for those who CAN'T. This does nothing to reduce prices. We need to stop giving incentives to biz to provide benefits, put that money in the workers paycheck, give the incentive to the employee instead of the biz, then let everyone shop for healthcare like they do anything else... then prices will PLUMET and be VASTLY more affordable for ALL of us!!!
nieten7642 2 years ago
They are part of the elite, but it's part of the name calling they are so good at.
Bush, having multiple degrees from Harvard, Yale, and Andover accuses John Kerry of being an elitist. Both belonged to the Skull and bones.
Difference between the Bush administration and Kerry was that Kerry actually went to Viet Nam and really was a hero. The chicken hawks had to make him into a coward. That's why I'll never identify myself with the right.
vidguy007 2 years ago
Because unlike Obama, Biden, Clinton, McCain, Snow, Frank, Dodd, Pelosi, Rangle, Reid, and almost all of the rest, she IS NOT WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT!!! We want a regular American with REAL American values in office! We want someone who gets what it means to live in America and isn't out of touch or serving special interests! Palin resonates with the American people because we are tired from the status quo from both parties!!
nieten7642 2 years ago
I know... Me too. I shot that vid at like 7:30 this morning and she wasn't arriving until roughly 11 hours later!!! I couldn't go because I had to go to work.
nieten7642 2 years ago
I wish I could have been there.
pastorgorman 2 years ago
Go stand out in the rain and talk to yourself, it's much the same thing.
vidguy007 2 years ago
Why? When I have YOU here keeping me company? ;)
nieten7642 2 years ago