Alternative to the many worlds Interpretation of quantum physics

[Athrun000]

I rather believe in the many world theory than believing in Wigner's friend theory 

[nickharvey7]

@Athrun000 But can you find the many worlds can you say they are here or they are there?

A theory based on continuous change continuous creation formed by the energy exchange of light or EMR does not have this problem!

[MrDkjunk]

One of the main reasons people use the Many-worlds interpretation of QM is because wave collapse makes no sense. Whats causing the wave to collapse here, and not there? Introducing Many-worlds solves this by basically saying, the wave actually collapses in all possible places, but each place is its own universe. This video claims that many worlds isn't necessary because waves collapse happens.... ok... I'm not saying this guys idea is wrong, but it is in no way an alternative to Many-worlds.

[nickharvey7]

@MrDkjunk It is an alternative to Many-worlds interpretation the waves collapsing and reforming represent the flow of time in just three dimensions. The wave collapses when they come into contact with a physical object. Forming new photons in space and new moments in time as a process of continuous creation! The many-worlds is an infinity of future possibilities in this theory.

[EpicSqrl]

Amazing.... Actually seems similar to the many worlds interpretations in some aspects. It seems strange that merely observing something could change the outcome, but I'm new to quantum mechanics. Most of this is WAY over my head! I don't understand how there are people who understand all of this.

[nickharvey7]

@EpicSqrl Yes its similar to the many worlds interpretation it is just that in this theory the different dimensions are potential future possibilities. It is not observing but coming into physical contact that changes light from a wave to a particle. None of us understand all of this sadly.

[Cheuvin]

you keep saying that we create spacetime it doesnt make sense. Dammit though, i like a lot of the ideas. they just arent coherent enough to make sense

[nickharvey7]

@Cheuvin In the Universe we have an infinite number of inertial reference frames and the rate that time flows will only be relative to the position and momentum of the objects that are creating or forming the reference frame. I call these reference frames space-times because they have their own rate of time. If you accelerate time will slow down in your reference frame relative to someone not accelerating. Therefore you create your own spacetime relative to your position and momentum!

[Elenkhos]

Hi Nick do you remember me? How do you make these lovely graphs, I love them, you're very talented.

[nickharvey7]

@Elenkhos Thanks! They are only a slideshow made on Windows Movie Maker. I don’t remember you I have a very bad memory I don’t remember anything unless I write it down, sorry!

[readabout]

Three processes: Matter - Antimatter Collision Nuclear Fusion Nuclear Fission

The three - in descending order - most energetic processes known.

(Gravity Waves and Black Holes do no exist - fictional math)

If an equal and opposite manifestation of the interaction of EMR is gravity, then the above three processes do not exist.

I can not relate - realistically or fundamentally - your Quantum Physics to my nuclear mathematical physics.

I see no need to overhaul Nuclear Physics - do you?

[nickharvey7]

@readabout I see no reason why the outward momentum of EMR cannot form the equal and opposite inward reaction of gravity and the three above processes also exit. Why do you feel they should not exist within the theory?

[7sevo7]

This is a beautiful theory!!!

Since all of the atoms that make up our bodies were formed out of the light energy of the universe's creation, it seems as though we we present at the moment of creation.

[nickharvey7]

@7sevo7 The observer is always in the moment of now. When light waves come in contact with the observer they will form photons electron couplings and new moments in time and space or spacetime. Creation is a continuous process happening now!

[9macrina9]

your videos are so beautiful and astonishing to me......thank you,sir.

[tungstenfusion]

truly awsome-

[RevDevilin]

And quantum tunnelling ?

[nickharvey7]

@RevDevilin In this theory we have quantum tunnelling because there is no flow of time at the quantum level. The quantum particle will not need sufficient energy to penetrate a barrier because the wave function will do this. Only when the wave function collapses will we find a particle on one side or the other as a new quantum particle in space and as a new moment in time.

[TaNgLeD2121]

fascinating.... 5 stars

[nickharvey7]

@TaNgLeD2121 Thanks for this!!!

[Camyum]

How is this theory similar to or different from Walter Russells theory of light?

[nickharvey7]

@Camyum I have not read up on Walter Russells theory of light that much but I have seen diagrams of concentric rings that could be seen as light spheres in three dimensional space. I dont believe he link the momentum of light with the arrow of time or even had a concept of time but I might be wrong.