No rule says you can't start and finish at a different locality... but using the same number twice is like adding another number to a linear equation. Even adding the extra operator which acts with the first number twice, is proving the use of an additional number. Using the same number twice by adding an operator which wouldn't be used in a linear equation, would be breaking the rules.
@Roger8710 thats why he said 3 ones can equal 4. He's proving a point about direction and form. I don't know why you guys don't get this, its simple. If you question your teachers you're on the right track to discovery and understanding... if you sit back and follow orders and simply accept things, you're just like every other sheep.. and the other sheep are morons.
Good man- your right, there is more to mathematics, than just vectors and linear forms to be explained by our organisation of numbers - we are only knew to math - do some more practical examples and speak louder so we can hear you - to show all these other confused people, what you mean with written examples. I like your idea- it should be worked on more.
His same argument goes for reading left-to-right, instead of reading triangles of letters to make words. His complaint is linear is simple, and you CAN make direction matter, but there is no point to making direction matter. It's useless to make an equation more complex by having to define directions.
And also; we have geometric equations, they're called matricies. Integrals of linear equations; that's precisely how you add extra diminsions; not by twisting sensicle lines in on themselves
This is ridiculous... the direction has nothing to do with it... we read the way we do because you have to read in some direction and so we picked one... in till of course we find a new way but that's just something we've used to explain the abstract with.
1+1 has been used to manage quantities... and has proved successful hence why we use it... algebra derives from the characteristics of quantities in an attempt to explain a bigger picture...
Awesome but all I need is linear math that moves on that line at lightspeed so 1's 2's and 3's all moving at the speed of light invent that for me please
I'm studying maths and can say we do care about "direction" or "order" and not restricted to physics.
Our current mathematics is not linear, we do have various orders, which are not linear. Check out differential equations.
The reason why mathematics is all on a single line is because, why the hell make it more complicate than it really is? Simplicity is key and being able to describe in an equation is one of the ultimate goals, where a "linear" equation can captures multi-dimensions anyway!
this guy is just crazy. he dosn't understand anything of maths, just some words, and with that he makes mystic esoteric out of it, going into geometry, an with that he will prove another math. but really, he just mixes up mixed pickles!
Sounds intriguing, but I'm not sure it really says anything. Direction already matters when you include multiple operators, as most people know 1+2*3 is computed by doing the multiplication first. Adding numbers in some sort of spacial configuration is equivalent to adding another operator (which would represent the act of spatially configuring , and maybe another operator to specify flow) whose order matters.
Also, a plane is LINEAR in the mathematical sense.
This is disfinity . The wrong side of infinity. Taking what we imagine and think we know and endlessly describe and divide and re-imagine. It is a process of denial of unity and inclusiveness. The more you know the less you know. Never going to get to a theory of "everything" in this way. "Everything" is an experience of infinity. The right side of infinity. Old School stuff. ~ I could be wrong.~
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
I think he's trying to describe recursive mathematics, or possibly a graphed equation that he failed to understand... I feel bad for anyone who takes this seriously. He's recounting the same "1". If you take one apple and put it into a basket, then another, you can NOT take the first apple and put it in the basket again, because it's already there. That's your 3 dimensional/volumetric mathematics that he wants lol. Simple logic.. As for his request, we have functions and arrays for that.
@steveecker IMHO what if his adding of geometric shape and direction is adding quantum physics to the situation in real life with apples where when the direction changes there is an apple which appears because of quantum physics which is incredibly unlikely but still could happen. Your using real life situations to explain the math where i a using math to explain real life situations. (just a thought)
If you apply this teory it means we are primitive as we speak left to right and write left to right and many other activities that we normaly do left to right
Like any theorist, I will take it for what it's worth (worth depending on which direction I take it) and apply this to physics, an attempt to create the missing link between quantum mechanics and conventional mechanics. I will announce my findings in about twenty years.
Quaternian allows this. James Clerk Maxwell gave us a blueprint for higher thinking until Heavyside got hold of it and simplified for us the wonderful rigors of absent meaning and listless rote we all so enjoyed in grade school. Bastards like that should be dug up and hanged for sake of propriety and as a show of earnest apology to our children. Besides, we make the meaning in numbers. They're nothing more than adjectives in applied fields. One can of soda to me might be 9 billion atoms to you.
1 4 27 256 3125 46 656 823 543 16 777 216 376 420 489 10 000 000 000 tetric chart of possibilities ..also called the numerical dimension graph .if u have 1 number and one space to conceive that number in there could only be one possibilty..if u had 2 numbers and two spaces you could have 4 possible conceptions an example could be as this i am using letters instead of numbers A.A A.B .....BA....BB
this is re-learned...how do you think the artisans designed and built the pyramids? math! volumnic & planar math! the fact that those great examples sit there tells u empirically that this ain't new thinkin'...uh duh
math...like any language... Spanish, French, English...euclidean, vedic...same difference...our problem is not seeing an area of planar or volumnic math for what it is as he described...it is considered physics...but mathematicians should be doing this because French ain't Spanish.
"you have to know the (right) question to know what the answer means" how do you think the pyramids were designed and laid so precisely ...ohhhhh so long ago? why don't we have volumnic mathematics? it's not physics...why treat it as such? he asks a great question...that honestly deserves an answer
@transfixedtornado i dont think you quite get what hes saying, so you think the universe is made of lines huh...also i had pretty much the same shut it scenario in school, i have proved them wrong times now.
Three 1's = Four because he used the same 1 twice...(Starting point) 0.o I think hes tricked himself. Not only that but because his made up equation is triangular with no conclusion/equals it would circle upon itself essentually equalling infinity...
@davenslice it is "legal" to use same 1 twice or any number of times you want as long as you are using non-linear method. That's exactly what he was trying to explain.
@davenslice He did use the same one twice but he never repeated an operator. He did one of the one's twice because the operator in his example instructed him to.
@hufon009 well if he uses the same "1" twice...wouldn't that really make it "two"?? SO to express his triangular volumetric equation in the traditional linear style equation it would be 2+1+1=4??
I guess I don't really see the point to what he is doing...what is the practical value?
@davenslice Maybe it could be used as a short hand way to identify geometric figures? For example, the value of a triangle would therefore before 4, a square would be 5, and I am sure 3d shapes would have their own unique identity with his system... However I think counting the sides is probably just as effective. I personally don't see the point either, other than maybe getting people to think outside the box. I'd rather see someone take on the question of if negative integers are necessary...
this reminds me of a quote "Any fool can make things more complicated, it takes a genius to do the opposite" you want to know who said it? Einstein...
yes but things that looks simple does usualy have more to it then it looks and to get progress we need to look at things in new directions. even einsteins laws had alot of errors that needed to change. But yup this guy looks more fun then usefull
@Kikkankleiven well said. I believe 1 needs to decide weather he is trying to invent different ways to play a game, or rather focus on the game itself. Math is our too for understanding the universe better. And ofcourse for daily calculations. What this person is doing, could be considered a personal amusement which is absolutely fine, but it has absolutely no relavance to mathematics. Unless he wants to invent his own theory and go from there...
He's playing word games. Anyone can come up with an obfuscated inversion of fundamental concepts like this. He's switching between the arrangement of symbols, their meanings, and their relative patterns without any regard for why we chose those arrangements. I could use the same distractions, for example, to convince you that ducks are blue by confusing you about colors, changing the meaning of words, and so on. So what's the point of this?
yes, the direction has a fundamental effect. This gentleman is creating linear equations but he is moving in different directions in a linear fashion. Geometry does what he is talking about as well imo.
but all jokes aside though, he is correct about the direction you pick to make a math equation, or to even get a certain type of answer baced on certain conditions and the direction approached...even in non-math this rule applies...The Direction of the convo determines the outcome in a favorable, non0favorable or neutral...But in all reality i think this guy is just rambling to get another dollar from the poor cameraman haha
Shut up you're an idiot. It's called obey the order of operations according according to what ever calculus you may be doing, commutative and distributive properties. You know why we don't do math in 3 dimensions? Because if you're gonna do math in 3 dimensions you'd may as well graph the mother fucker! Stupid shit, he isn't right in the slightest, he took every rule of mathematics and broke it, thus his answer isn't constant. We want math to be constant fool.
for those of you that have completed higher math...he is right about algebra is better than simple arithmetic for solving problems...if you studied geometry, trig, calculus, physics...you understand planes...he is right...his point if that linear equations is limiting...planar and/or volumnic mathematics should exist and could change our way of life...listen to him again...somehow mathemeticians end at a place that physicists have used for some time...planar and volumnic...grow
yea he is correct if you can actually change the space continuum without any effort at all. you change the direction in that way means you are change the physics of the operator itself, therefore you are acutaly 2 different systems. Of course you get different answer. That is not because of direction but all he did is link that BS into the direction forcefully.
Hey I'm delivering a message from Allah's temple of holy cocks. YOU'RE A FAGGOT LOLOL *Urinates on your mother's grave...thank's for nothing sloppy bitch. realgundam has AIDS though haha look your grandpa just ripped ass right through the diaper la la la la hitler was so right
math is linear when its supposed to be. If I was counting the number of dogs in my yard I wouldnt subtract them from the number of cats. with that said he is almost on to something.
ur get up,,,,,beared mustach with a long hair,,,,,,,name albert or smthing lik dat,,,,,,coz of ur age people might surf on ur site and u wud earn some money,,,,,,good job,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
We have to do this to maintain the uniqueness and consistency of calculation for our routine dealings and economics. We use one dimensional mathematics because if we use two or three or multi dimensional maths (as used in Disc Operating Systems or DOS in computers) we would have to specify the number of dimensions used for that specific calculation.
You have ignored the operator "=". You chose to put it wherever you wanted while eliminating the dimensions. operators are the limits we put on calculations to get a concluding outcome, which is predefined and which has a specific implementation for that particular instance. Concludingly, You are 1) eliminating all the dimensions, 2) disregarding the choice of operator and 3) removing the subjectivity of calculation.
This can give you various results and will always differ.
The custom is not there to restrict on the way you can use mathematics, but is there to maintain the consistency of our daily interactions in terms of numbers.
@me3tv@me3tv now ask yourself why the consistency of our daily interactions is such a sacred subject matter that can not be changed. Consistency, stability, safety, preservation, comfort zones, resistance to change. All these things have a reason, and it seems to me there is only one reason such things exist
No direction still doesnt matter, your simply just re-adding the same number, thats not how math works. if you have 3A+4A you get 7A, not 10A or 11A, you dont just keepp going. Its called combining like terms so if you have 2 terms you end with one. you have no logical leg to stand on
a true word SirThunderbird. Adding a number twice and not removing it after already adding it is wrong, or at best just a little pseudo mathematical trick. But still kinda funny to watch. I´m in the mood for apples now
this is NOT profound at all he is simply wrong. He added 1+1+1 and then added the frist 1 again, so there are four ones. He then says oh three 1s equals four, NO four ones equal four, because you counted the first one twice, therefore it is (2*1)+1+1 and direction is still irrelevant. Complicated does not eqqual smart
@colombian800 you are simply talking about linear method. for a linear method that bum is obviously wrong, but the problem here is that the bum is not talking about linear method to begin with )
im sorry to say that this guy has no idea of what he is saying. As true as this all sounds, it has no place in problem solving because it does not solve anything in the mathematic world
3a + a ... in algebra I would say 4a.
TragicomicJoker 1 month ago
yeah like all the scientist were waiting for was the answer to this ancient mystery: 1+1?
abdosdt 1 month ago
He clearly has type 1 schizophrenia
rapplejab 1 month ago
fruitcake
johnnybraut 2 months ago
No rule says you can't start and finish at a different locality... but using the same number twice is like adding another number to a linear equation. Even adding the extra operator which acts with the first number twice, is proving the use of an additional number. Using the same number twice by adding an operator which wouldn't be used in a linear equation, would be breaking the rules.
maxzutter 2 months ago
You got a better way to teach ALGEBRA?
uilium 2 months ago
You use an old microphone?
uilium 2 months ago
can someone explain to my why he can use more than two ones
verblac2 3 months ago
Sorry old man but your adding one of the ones twice
Roger8710 3 months ago
@Roger8710 thats why he said 3 ones can equal 4. He's proving a point about direction and form. I don't know why you guys don't get this, its simple. If you question your teachers you're on the right track to discovery and understanding... if you sit back and follow orders and simply accept things, you're just like every other sheep.. and the other sheep are morons.
Takiado 1 month ago
@Takiado ummm Takiado, drugs are bad, mmmkay?
rapplejab 1 month ago 2
Good man- your right, there is more to mathematics, than just vectors and linear forms to be explained by our organisation of numbers - we are only knew to math - do some more practical examples and speak louder so we can hear you - to show all these other confused people, what you mean with written examples. I like your idea- it should be worked on more.
nice888you 3 months ago
master bullshitter.
jovanholden1 3 months ago 5
So, in his idea, there is no such thing as a singular object, like a circle, but really an infinite amount of circles within that circle.
lol
NickVrahoretis 3 months ago
I dont get it
PigsWing1977 3 months ago
He is stoned.
sajidullah 3 months ago
what is he talking about, you cant use one 1 twice :P
or maybe its me.. well well i still stick to the good old 1+1=2 :D
armenac92 3 months ago
lol
qrais 4 months ago
nowadays everybody wanna talk like they got sompm da say, but nothin comes out when they move they lips, Jes a buncha gibberash
CaptainArrrgh 4 months ago
this reeks of speciousness. he's suSPECIOUS.
BigOldMrKnish 4 months ago
ya look stinky my brotha
theturkeycrew 4 months ago
His same argument goes for reading left-to-right, instead of reading triangles of letters to make words. His complaint is linear is simple, and you CAN make direction matter, but there is no point to making direction matter. It's useless to make an equation more complex by having to define directions.
And also; we have geometric equations, they're called matricies. Integrals of linear equations; that's precisely how you add extra diminsions; not by twisting sensicle lines in on themselves
Xylos144 4 months ago
you could of proved direction matters by just using division. 1 divided by 3 is different from 3 divided by 1.
mindlesstube 4 months ago
This is ridiculous... the direction has nothing to do with it... we read the way we do because you have to read in some direction and so we picked one... in till of course we find a new way but that's just something we've used to explain the abstract with.
1+1 has been used to manage quantities... and has proved successful hence why we use it... algebra derives from the characteristics of quantities in an attempt to explain a bigger picture...
If you're a genius I'm screwed.
Dolphidood 5 months ago
Awesome but all I need is linear math that moves on that line at lightspeed so 1's 2's and 3's all moving at the speed of light invent that for me please
13sam31 5 months ago
When you decide to embezzle from your employer, you hire this guy to start keeping the books.
boydcrochet 5 months ago
I'm studying maths and can say we do care about "direction" or "order" and not restricted to physics.
Our current mathematics is not linear, we do have various orders, which are not linear. Check out differential equations.
The reason why mathematics is all on a single line is because, why the hell make it more complicate than it really is? Simplicity is key and being able to describe in an equation is one of the ultimate goals, where a "linear" equation can captures multi-dimensions anyway!
zasderf 6 months ago
its a contradiction. by adding the first 1 again, your're also taking 1 away at the same time.
justinroseart 6 months ago
But Why do this?
dudemandye 7 months ago
i don't know wtf this buy is talking about. is he talking about vectors? vectors has unit of one and different directions lmao
17phi 7 months ago
This subject matter is retarded yet he explains what 1 + 1 like a professor doing a lecture.
CiaoBello21 7 months ago
Do this;
1. Grab two apples
2. Count them
3. You will have two apples
4 Grab another apple
5. Count them
6 . You will have 3 apples.
7. Mix them up in 3d space.
Guess what 3 apples!
cory1337 8 months ago
@cory1337 Put it in a blender and guess what? Applesauce bitch!
cory1337 8 months ago
This is what happens when you divide zero in your head. Your brain will implode like this man did.
TKgeniusHELLTX 8 months ago 2
@TKgeniusHELLTX hahahahahahahaha!
mcmillianq 7 months ago
silly hobos....
MegaBEANER1000 9 months ago
this guy is just crazy. he dosn't understand anything of maths, just some words, and with that he makes mystic esoteric out of it, going into geometry, an with that he will prove another math. but really, he just mixes up mixed pickles!
long live the invisible pink unicorn!
Humanyu1 9 months ago
Sounds intriguing, but I'm not sure it really says anything. Direction already matters when you include multiple operators, as most people know 1+2*3 is computed by doing the multiplication first. Adding numbers in some sort of spacial configuration is equivalent to adding another operator (which would represent the act of spatially configuring , and maybe another operator to specify flow) whose order matters.
Also, a plane is LINEAR in the mathematical sense.
What about matrices/tensors?
ForcesOfOdin 10 months ago
This is disfinity . The wrong side of infinity. Taking what we imagine and think we know and endlessly describe and divide and re-imagine. It is a process of denial of unity and inclusiveness. The more you know the less you know. Never going to get to a theory of "everything" in this way. "Everything" is an experience of infinity. The right side of infinity. Old School stuff. ~ I could be wrong.~
3877michael 10 months ago
"it's linear...no matter how you go about it"
IcepickCatfish 10 months ago
but what if someone is holding a mirror nearby, then it would be double.
thumb this up.
glinka57 10 months ago
He is correct, it all depends on the direction.
davidallany1 11 months ago
please don't waste our time with your non-sense.
dudemode 11 months ago
I think he's talking about 3 dimensional mathematics. Geometrically speaking, where current mathematics explains things in a 2 dimesional way.
tubesurfer007 11 months ago
why did he do this while it was raining?
penguindiverz 11 months ago
die already
darrenzimm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
skiMackski 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
skiMackski 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Folks this is what happens when you use mind altering drugs that wipe out your past, you start talking about nothing, the number zero is a place holder too.
skiMackski 1 year ago
If he's so bright why hasn't he got an umbrella!
JurassicPlank 1 year ago
i can tell how complex computations is by looking to his beard....
xHizukax 1 year ago
I'm glad he doesn't live in the White House.
sportnwoody 1 year ago
he's still right...stop thinking linear...all of nature curves
TheFunnyQQ 1 year ago
ill tell you WHAT I DO KNOW!!! this mother fucker needs to go back to GRADE SCHOOL!!!
death2opposeme 1 year ago
i need this mother fuckers extra chromosome!
death2opposeme 1 year ago
LOL he's never heard of a matrix...
MobiusCoin 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
MobiusCoin 1 year ago
When I was in Junior High my friend told me that the night before his dad explained to him that "1 = 0" and said he was creeped out XD
SuperHaloStarwarsFan 1 year ago
That's why we have basic addition and then algebra they're both right
Jbinkley79 1 year ago
why defend the obvious, he's funny though
annihilus2 1 year ago
I think he's trying to describe recursive mathematics, or possibly a graphed equation that he failed to understand... I feel bad for anyone who takes this seriously. He's recounting the same "1". If you take one apple and put it into a basket, then another, you can NOT take the first apple and put it in the basket again, because it's already there. That's your 3 dimensional/volumetric mathematics that he wants lol. Simple logic.. As for his request, we have functions and arrays for that.
steveecker 1 year ago
@steveecker IMHO what if his adding of geometric shape and direction is adding quantum physics to the situation in real life with apples where when the direction changes there is an apple which appears because of quantum physics which is incredibly unlikely but still could happen. Your using real life situations to explain the math where i a using math to explain real life situations. (just a thought)
ZombieSlushy 1 year ago
@ZombieSlushy any level of logical thought expresses the same end result. he misunderstood what hes trying to explain lol.
steveecker 1 year ago
Dumbledore!!!
brightonboarder 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy is an idiot
renegatt 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure mathematics considers direction. It's called geometry.
bodhidarma1 1 year ago
the movie "Contact" covered this. Australians....
NWDEstroyer 1 year ago
If you count the same thing too many times you will think you have more than you do. This may well be why you are homeless.
gnamp 1 year ago
you counted the one twice your just trying to prove somebody wrong
prime342 1 year ago
if we add 1drop water + 1 drop water we get still 1 drop water ! :)
sarathbat 1 year ago
this video speaks physics - vector algebra ( applied mathematics ) .. am surprised to know that '=' means much more than just numbers !
sarathbat 1 year ago
Comment removed
abadrutt 1 year ago
If you apply this teory it means we are primitive as we speak left to right and write left to right and many other activities that we normaly do left to right
abadrutt 1 year ago
i get it
RayWilliamJohansen 1 year ago
@RayWilliamJohansen no you don't!
scavenski 1 year ago
All this video shows me is a part of why this guy is homeless.
tazdevil112 1 year ago
@tazdevil112 jajjjjja lololol
mostterr3 1 year ago
directed graphs are already known and are descibable through known mathematics. nothing new here.
sp4zzpp2 1 year ago
Like any theorist, I will take it for what it's worth (worth depending on which direction I take it) and apply this to physics, an attempt to create the missing link between quantum mechanics and conventional mechanics. I will announce my findings in about twenty years.
pauldavidmerritt 1 year ago
Quaternian allows this. James Clerk Maxwell gave us a blueprint for higher thinking until Heavyside got hold of it and simplified for us the wonderful rigors of absent meaning and listless rote we all so enjoyed in grade school. Bastards like that should be dug up and hanged for sake of propriety and as a show of earnest apology to our children. Besides, we make the meaning in numbers. They're nothing more than adjectives in applied fields. One can of soda to me might be 9 billion atoms to you.
USpaladin 1 year ago
lol what an idiot he is completely wrong haahhaha
nicknack9879 1 year ago
Oh dear God... Help this man.
danrayson 1 year ago
He is right about the scientific philosophy and he did make a good point. you can look at this equation for aspacs of your life as well
TylerThrashPeace 1 year ago
illuminati33rddegree 1 year ago
@illuminati33rddegree 387 420 489 ..I AM WRITING THIS NUMBER AGAIN FOR REASONS COMPLETELY ATOMIC
illuminati33rddegree 1 year ago
hahaha
this isnt even worth it. what a joke of an idea. this guy is hilariously ignorant. thanks guy who posted this, glad you found it - good laughs
EboIaSniper 1 year ago
1 )take a deep breath
2)think of sum1 u like
3)press f10 five times
4)copy dis to five videos
5)look at ur backqround 10 uur ge
sirnoach 1 year ago
this is re-learned...how do you think the artisans designed and built the pyramids? math! volumnic & planar math! the fact that those great examples sit there tells u empirically that this ain't new thinkin'...uh duh
VoiceOfReasonQQ 1 year ago
math...like any language... Spanish, French, English...euclidean, vedic...same difference...our problem is not seeing an area of planar or volumnic math for what it is as he described...it is considered physics...but mathematicians should be doing this because French ain't Spanish.
VoiceOfReasonQQ 1 year ago
Another person who always fail his maths.
IceyFoxy 1 year ago
I like his theory except I would have to add that direction still dosnt matter until after the first computation.
metapatriot 1 year ago
"there is no such thing as a straight line" Immanuel Kant
ising2love 1 year ago
"you have to know the (right) question to know what the answer means" how do you think the pyramids were designed and laid so precisely ...ohhhhh so long ago? why don't we have volumnic mathematics? it's not physics...why treat it as such? he asks a great question...that honestly deserves an answer
VoiceOfReasonQQ 1 year ago
he is describing a loop...closed...don't think linear...think "curve"
VoiceOfReasonQQ 1 year ago
for + and * are commutative like that, but / and - are not.
His whole argument is unfortunatley invalid.
And what he is demonstrating here is not "linear" algebra, it's arithmetics.
Nice background music though!
transfixedtornado 2 years ago
@transfixedtornado i dont think you quite get what hes saying, so you think the universe is made of lines huh...also i had pretty much the same shut it scenario in school, i have proved them wrong times now.
KKinsane2009 2 years ago
Three 1's = Four because he used the same 1 twice...(Starting point) 0.o I think hes tricked himself. Not only that but because his made up equation is triangular with no conclusion/equals it would circle upon itself essentually equalling infinity...
davenslice 2 years ago 19
@davenslice it is "legal" to use same 1 twice or any number of times you want as long as you are using non-linear method. That's exactly what he was trying to explain.
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
@davenslice He did use the same one twice but he never repeated an operator. He did one of the one's twice because the operator in his example instructed him to.
hufon009 11 months ago
@hufon009 well if he uses the same "1" twice...wouldn't that really make it "two"?? SO to express his triangular volumetric equation in the traditional linear style equation it would be 2+1+1=4??
I guess I don't really see the point to what he is doing...what is the practical value?
davenslice 10 months ago
@davenslice Maybe it could be used as a short hand way to identify geometric figures? For example, the value of a triangle would therefore before 4, a square would be 5, and I am sure 3d shapes would have their own unique identity with his system... However I think counting the sides is probably just as effective. I personally don't see the point either, other than maybe getting people to think outside the box. I'd rather see someone take on the question of if negative integers are necessary...
hufon009 10 months ago
this reminds me of a quote "Any fool can make things more complicated, it takes a genius to do the opposite" you want to know who said it? Einstein...
ramtinking 2 years ago 15
yes but things that looks simple does usualy have more to it then it looks and to get progress we need to look at things in new directions. even einsteins laws had alot of errors that needed to change. But yup this guy looks more fun then usefull
Kikkankleiven 2 years ago
@Kikkankleiven well said. I believe 1 needs to decide weather he is trying to invent different ways to play a game, or rather focus on the game itself. Math is our too for understanding the universe better. And ofcourse for daily calculations. What this person is doing, could be considered a personal amusement which is absolutely fine, but it has absolutely no relavance to mathematics. Unless he wants to invent his own theory and go from there...
ramtinking 2 years ago
He's playing word games. Anyone can come up with an obfuscated inversion of fundamental concepts like this. He's switching between the arrangement of symbols, their meanings, and their relative patterns without any regard for why we chose those arrangements. I could use the same distractions, for example, to convince you that ducks are blue by confusing you about colors, changing the meaning of words, and so on. So what's the point of this?
planetdarwin 2 years ago
he's still right
VoiceOfReasonQQ 2 years ago
yes, the direction has a fundamental effect. This gentleman is creating linear equations but he is moving in different directions in a linear fashion. Geometry does what he is talking about as well imo.
chicknwangs 2 years ago
I have watched this video many times and i really begin to understand the simple truth in Don Alberts idea, amazing you are Don Albert..
aramfare 2 years ago
not even gonna watch the whole thing but a wast of time
theonlymoy 2 years ago
Interesting
otkmaster 2 years ago
repoman-im here to take ur house
homeless guy-oh no!take my house,and everthing elts,just not my camera!!!
beastmoder112 2 years ago
ur homeless but u have a camera?lol
beastmoder112 2 years ago 2
but all jokes aside though, he is correct about the direction you pick to make a math equation, or to even get a certain type of answer baced on certain conditions and the direction approached...even in non-math this rule applies...The Direction of the convo determines the outcome in a favorable, non0favorable or neutral...But in all reality i think this guy is just rambling to get another dollar from the poor cameraman haha
MadMAn12gauge 2 years ago
Shut up you're an idiot. It's called obey the order of operations according according to what ever calculus you may be doing, commutative and distributive properties. You know why we don't do math in 3 dimensions? Because if you're gonna do math in 3 dimensions you'd may as well graph the mother fucker! Stupid shit, he isn't right in the slightest, he took every rule of mathematics and broke it, thus his answer isn't constant. We want math to be constant fool.
therealfactor 2 years ago
yap yap yap idiot yap yap yap yap operations yap yap yap yap commutative yap yap yap dimentions yap yap yapshit yap yap yap slightest yap yap yap broke yap yap yap constant yap yap yap math yap yap yap
MadMAn12gauge 2 years ago
this guy needs to lay off the peyote...
I bet the convo with the camera man all started at
"hey can i have a dollar?!" and boom the camera man had to sit and listen to this pointless bullshit for 5-6 minutes
MadMAn12gauge 2 years ago
for those of you that have completed higher math...he is right about algebra is better than simple arithmetic for solving problems...if you studied geometry, trig, calculus, physics...you understand planes...he is right...his point if that linear equations is limiting...planar and/or volumnic mathematics should exist and could change our way of life...listen to him again...somehow mathemeticians end at a place that physicists have used for some time...planar and volumnic...grow
VoiceOfReasonQQ 2 years ago
I clicked the playbar on various parts from left to right and right to left, I found out it doesnt make less sense. Maybe he was right.
Wazzamazizzi 2 years ago
i dont know what the fuck kind of rhetoric he is using to substantiate his reasoning, but the world i live in
1+1 = 2
ive seen that bullshit 1+1 = 0 proof, and how to use a base system other than 10.
find me a place in america that counts in base system other than 10, and ill believe this guy.
TehD00de 2 years ago
im kinda dun get it @@
abc10thousands 2 years ago
duh!...i love this guy
VoiceOfReasonQQ 2 years ago
wow that guy is so fucking smart. I wish I was fucking homeless
NearlyFriend 2 years ago
I want to punch him oh his throat!
chefjherwin 2 years ago
ok why don't we just say the answer then get asked the question???
FuckMePictures 2 years ago
"NOW SHUT UP"
hahaha
etselec2678 2 years ago
that guy is... kinda stupid if you ask me
hey! gess what dog + 7 is its 11!!!
ill prove it. dogs have 4 legs right? so you do 4 + 7 x 12000 divided by 12000 and you get 11!!!! YAAYYY MATH IS FUNN
dedeede27 2 years ago
yea he is correct if you can actually change the space continuum without any effort at all. you change the direction in that way means you are change the physics of the operator itself, therefore you are acutaly 2 different systems. Of course you get different answer. That is not because of direction but all he did is link that BS into the direction forcefully.
realgundam 2 years ago
Hey I'm delivering a message from Allah's temple of holy cocks. YOU'RE A FAGGOT LOLOL *Urinates on your mother's grave...thank's for nothing sloppy bitch. realgundam has AIDS though haha look your grandpa just ripped ass right through the diaper la la la la hitler was so right
anomiemnemonical 2 years ago
How many mushrooms does it take to become so ingenious? n? n² ? infinite number ?!?
kungullari 2 years ago
jeez he didn't start making sense until the end he could have saved me 5 minutes if he just explained the pyramid thing first
iloveme130 2 years ago
3d Mathematics
imageanative999 2 years ago
is he taking a shit.
QarbitraryQ 2 years ago
Thaks for posting this. Tell me then why 10*10=0.
Where has this 10 gone?
scentamanta 2 years ago
math is linear when its supposed to be. If I was counting the number of dogs in my yard I wouldnt subtract them from the number of cats. with that said he is almost on to something.
Davidrcobb 2 years ago
is this supposed to not make any sense?
WhackaMack 2 years ago
your comment along with the video made me laugh harder than i have in a while, thanks, i'm in tears.
marisabia07 2 years ago
:D lol
WhackaMack 2 years ago
u r very smart i must say,reason 1. look @
ur get up,,,,,beared mustach with a long hair,,,,,,,name albert or smthing lik dat,,,,,,coz of ur age people might surf on ur site and u wud earn some money,,,,,,good job,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
robinluvs 2 years ago
adk977 (part 1)
We have to do this to maintain the uniqueness and consistency of calculation for our routine dealings and economics. We use one dimensional mathematics because if we use two or three or multi dimensional maths (as used in Disc Operating Systems or DOS in computers) we would have to specify the number of dimensions used for that specific calculation.
me3tv 3 years ago
adk977 (part 2)
You have ignored the operator "=". You chose to put it wherever you wanted while eliminating the dimensions. operators are the limits we put on calculations to get a concluding outcome, which is predefined and which has a specific implementation for that particular instance. Concludingly, You are 1) eliminating all the dimensions, 2) disregarding the choice of operator and 3) removing the subjectivity of calculation.
me3tv 3 years ago
adk977 said: (part 3)
This can give you various results and will always differ.
The custom is not there to restrict on the way you can use mathematics, but is there to maintain the consistency of our daily interactions in terms of numbers.
me3tv 3 years ago
@me3tv @me3tv now ask yourself why the consistency of our daily interactions is such a sacred subject matter that can not be changed. Consistency, stability, safety, preservation, comfort zones, resistance to change. All these things have a reason, and it seems to me there is only one reason such things exist
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
No direction still doesnt matter, your simply just re-adding the same number, thats not how math works. if you have 3A+4A you get 7A, not 10A or 11A, you dont just keepp going. Its called combining like terms so if you have 2 terms you end with one. you have no logical leg to stand on
38conte 3 years ago
also why would we need to change the rules they work! they solve the problem
No0n3y 3 years ago
numbers are a concept anyway
logic says that 3 ones are 3 end of !!
so what if it equals 0 what is you point what is the message nothing so shut UP !!
No0n3y 3 years ago
10-12=0....
C1anMcLeod 2 years ago
Ok i see the point mine is.. Dont play with your food stop it no playing with your food.
Chaced187 3 years ago
after the video "ok i said your bullshit now give me some liqure!"
shorty962 3 years ago 2
1+1=11
cause if u put the Two ones,
You'll get 11 :) LOL
MetallicaManiacDude 3 years ago
so funny....what is he talking about!
KnowThyself24 3 years ago
what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lol!!!
timothygaskins1982 3 years ago
THIS IS SO FUNNY.....
sainterj2 3 years ago
dude is right if u keep going in directions but that makes no sense as far as mathematics on paper for testing purposes
SoonerFanJP 3 years ago
this man is wrong... he addes the smae number twice...
and btw three apples in triangle are still only three apples, not four or five...
SirThundenbird 3 years ago
a true word SirThunderbird. Adding a number twice and not removing it after already adding it is wrong, or at best just a little pseudo mathematical trick. But still kinda funny to watch. I´m in the mood for apples now
nofuckingwai 3 years ago
okay this guy is retarded if you do not eliminate the numbers when adding and add the same number twice off coarse you will get a different sum.
if a+b+c=3 (given)
a+b+c+a=4
he is not just changing the order. he changes the amount of times each number is added
hackerpimp123 3 years ago
The guy is correct
DeadlyDragon112 3 years ago
this guy is a genius
Wareflea 3 years ago
this is NOT profound at all he is simply wrong. He added 1+1+1 and then added the frist 1 again, so there are four ones. He then says oh three 1s equals four, NO four ones equal four, because you counted the first one twice, therefore it is (2*1)+1+1 and direction is still irrelevant. Complicated does not eqqual smart
colombian800 3 years ago 10
@colombian800 In Soviet Russia, 1+1 equals Marx and Engels ;)
cyberdaemon 1 year ago
@colombian800 you are simply talking about linear method. for a linear method that bum is obviously wrong, but the problem here is that the bum is not talking about linear method to begin with )
ActiveStorage 1 year ago
rofl
Smoking799 3 years ago
he added an equal sign after he added the first numbers you cant do that like
+1+1 see there thats what he did first + 1
then after he did this +1=+1 + 1
so that is the orignal problem but you cant just add the equal sign after you add thats just retarded
resistance821 3 years ago
im sorry to say that this guy has no idea of what he is saying. As true as this all sounds, it has no place in problem solving because it does not solve anything in the mathematic world
Raikiribokken 3 years ago
Yes it does! IN abstral geometry! You need to be updated!
gray55571 3 years ago
That made perfect sense to me....Nothing he said was complicating at all. And he's not a jew, you can tell by his nose! :p
Notice he said "(n)umber, (o)perator." He kept spelling NO NO NO NO NO!
Here's a question
N + 7 = 14
7 + N = 32
N + N = 64
What is N? Good luck on figuring that one out.
p.s if you know how to program the least bit you'd understand what he was talking about considering there's a lot of weird math that's put into it.
34tm3dam1T 3 years ago
is that even possible to figure out?
lilgeodaprince 3 years ago
can this be solved ? u made me curious :)).i think it's impossible
vladmytroy 3 years ago
n=7
n=25
n=32
you never said they were all the same thing :)
i think theres a way to make them all the same but i cant figure it out...
Superdeduper739 3 years ago
this is all complicated but it works completely! amazing
hahamesmrt 3 years ago
this sounds stupid but its all true
hahamesmrt 3 years ago
TOO MUCH NERD TALK!!!!!!!
Jettest 3 years ago