Added: 4 years ago
From: BubbaLouis
Views: 187,692
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (682)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They're allegedly building a nuclear bomb, so we need to drop a nuclear bomb on them.

    Wankers.

  • Neutron bomb.

  • free the world - bomb iran

  • @dobrovoljac1971 free the world by shutting the fuck up

  • @msskool as a good muslim i dont talk to women

  • @dobrovoljac1971 what makes you think I'm a women dumbass? my names not mrskool its msskool

  • @msskool ok yea true, my fault. asche auf mein haupt. in the meantime go and watch one of your liked videos: "How To Approach Women Without Fear" muhahahaha

  • @dobrovoljac1971 what assumptions do you have for watching a video? what a shallow person you are.

    suck a dick

  • Give Peace a Chance. Bomb Iran with nuclear bunker busters! The fallout produced by the nuclear bunker buster is extremely localized. Rain removes radioactive particles from the atmosphere.

    A U.S. survey of 1000 likely voters by Pulse Opinion Research found that 49 percent of Americans said the U.S. should use military force to stop Iran from developing or acquiring a nuclear weapon, compared to 31 percent who said military force should not be used and 20 percent who said they were not sure.

  • I wrote a letter to The United States congress : To stop the Government from making RNEP's I gave them millions of reasons why not to make them in (DETAILl). Thanks to my letter they stopped the Government from making RNEP ,and I even got a letter back from the US congress thanking me  for writing my letter to them .

    So get off your lazy fucking asses ,and do something instead of fucking arguing to each other like a bunch of monkeys fucking a football

  • drop this bomb 3 million terroristic muslims less to deal with.

  • There are so many things in this video that are wrong with no credibility and or the main key point evidence “In this simulation developed by the pentagon” Really? So now the Pentagon releases classified metal….such a crap video go back to editing school euro noob

  • Union of Communist Scientists LOL

  • Pilot can't aim for shit.

  • The Union of Concerned Scientists pussys are allIranian dogs. All this while the Iranians are planning to anihilate humanity in the name of their religion.

    Make no mistake, Iran is on a willing suicidal path with a goal to destroy the planet, including themself, in the name of their religion. Remeber the virgins story? Iran trully believes it, and they have legions of wannabe martyrs in their suiciadal brigades

  • @RomanicusMaximus Iran has never attacked or invanded another country and they have never threatened to invade or attack another nations. They have never started a war, there are no evidences for any nuclear ambitions at all, only empty accusations, allegations from the same people who spread the empty accusations, allegations, about Iraqi WMDs.

    And you are talkin about Iran as warhungry? Maybe you should have a look at the USA and check the facts which country who is the real threat

  • @Jasminewynja Yeah, sure, fagg, Iran NEVER treaten to wipe Israel off the map. They never tried to get their hands on the nukes, oh, no, the fucker as as peacefull as they come. What, they lost their voice now cuz we send a few rafts in their back yard. I really hope they make a move, these fuckers. Fuck Iran and fuck ya too, cock sucker!

  • @Romanicus "Iran NEVER treaten to wipe Israel off the map"

    Correct!

  • @Jasminewynja What bitch, do you live in a different world?

  • @RomanicusMaximus Nope. IF you are sure, please prove yourself correct.

    1. The quote exactly.

    2. The source for the quote.

    Should be simple if it's me who lives in a different world. And please.... I'm above "bitch" this and "bitch" that. You can't provoke me with such nonsense. Is there seriously any reason for that kind of meaningless language? I am serious. IF he, Ahmadinejad, said something i don't know about i'm really interested. It might change my opinion.

  • @Jasminewynja "How Israel should be destroyed," The book quotes extensively from the views of Ayatollah Khomeini, founder of the Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, under the heading, "Israel Must Be Destroyed." The book's editor Hojjat-ol-Eslam Mohammad Ebrahim-Nia stresses that this prescription has the force of a fatwa (religious edict) and is binding on every Muslim. 

  • Comment removed

  • @Jasminewynja satisfied, babe? I say get a dive deep in your trance music and smoke that JUJU makes you wet and sticky inside and give me a pm

  • a biological response is the best course of action, just saying.

  • DROP IT NOW!

  • this video is propagange. u.s.a already have a better bomb ( penetrate way farther ) 

  • kill millions,sure america and nato are experts at killing millions,,,scumbags

  • conventional weapons delivered to the entry ways are the best option.

  • UCS is a Communist front organisation. A nuclear bunker buster would penetrate many hundreds of meters underground after coming in at supersonic speed and the blast would be focused downward, much like a conventional explosive.

  • Bullshit it'll only penetrate a few meters. There's another bunker busters bomb the penetraited 4ft of solid steel and STILL exploded.

  • The US already knows the only way to get to this Bunker in Iran is a ground strike. This is why they well start with sanctions and at some point convince some allies to go in and get them under some flag.

  • ONE MEGATON BOMB ??? FOR UNDERGROUND TARGET ? YOU TALKING BULLSHIT.THE SPESIFIC BOMB THAT SHOULD DISTROY A DEEP UNDERGRAUND TARGET ARE JUST FEW KILOTONS .

  • @oded999191 Can I have what your smoking?

  • @Cardinals525

    when you will celebrate your 13 years old come back i will tell you.

  • @oded999191 Im 15 :D

  • This video is stupid... US won't bomb Iran, Isreal will do it well before we did it. Watch "Raid on the Reactor" that details what Isreal did last time a nuclear facility was built near them.

  • There is no way the US is even considering this. This is some bullshit.

  • LOL they think that the US is going to nuke Iran? Are you fucking kidding me? These guys have no idea what the hell they are talking about.

  • fuck america

  • @DOTCurrency Fuck you!

  • the jew is the true menace for the human specie of this planet. The jew are the creators of wars.

  • They are so dumb because...

    If I country is thretend for attack and then attacked then it will cause a nucler war wich will resolt in...

    Earth+Nuke=No Earth

  • @00Unwanted00

    i disagree,earth would still be here ,just the humans on it would be gone,which could be a good thing

  • THIS IS A ZIONIST WAR MADE TO PROTECT THE ASS TO THE ZIONIST WHORE OF ISRA-SHIT USING THE MONEY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR TERRORISM AGAINST THE PEACEFULL ISLAMIC NATIONS.

  • @barbarotico You retard we don't nukes to kill Muslims. You do a good job of that training your next generation of kids to be suicide bombers! One reason you ignorant ass nut jobs target school buses full of kids, You hate because it gives you purpose in your missable life!

  • this useless this moron is concerned about somthing he obviously doesnt understand the reason why its nuclear is because its ten times more effective and the fact that bunker busters actually do penitrate much much further than shown in this video dubs it completly false.. go fuck a donkey who gives a damn this world has to many idiots on the planet any way i say kill ehm...even if its me. where all a blight on this planet

  • Funny, testing contradicts this information. Furthermore, thanks for telling us how far down Iran's bunkers are located.

  • Oooo ! And also, the bunker buster would be really loud and make big scary noises !

    Waaaa !!

  • Brought to you by the Union of Concerned Douchebags.

  • a 1MT nuke will cause a lot more damage than what they show, bunker busters go very deep these days, and America won't use anything even close to that magnitude because anything over 250KT is concidered a "Strategic Weapon", allowed only in the event of an all out nuclear war - highest yield will be no more than 15KT, which believe me is well beyond the neccessary strength...also, Israel will use nukes only in the event that it gets nuked itself, so no need to worry

  • Liberal bull$#!^

  • Why would it be a megaton... it would probably only by little boy-sized, like 15-20 kilotons

  • modern nukes have little radiation as they use little radioactive matter to start the reaction that starts fusion.

  • Leftist narative? We have the power to do the same things with non-nukelear wepons. Thought the details are streatched, this device's use is not justified.

  • The Leftist Naivete at Work...

    Life is like a TV Show..thats why we elect fun feel good celebrities to office.

    War should be like our favorite video game..fun and no consequences.

    When faced with nuclear annhilation..the USA should above all

    keep Good Housekeeping as its #1 priority..because of course

    those building nuclear bombs in Iran have the same priorities.

  • This is BS our bunker busters can go down over 300 feet, he just said that radiation doesnt go far underground so that means its contained. All tests since 1962 are illegal partial test ban treaty. (some states still do it cough north korea) the nuclear weapons are quite small. Chernobyl let of thousands of times more radiation then our biggest nukes. Only killed under 100. many birth defects and cancers but this was thousands more times then a bomb and it was open for weeks.

  • @meronmotors Hey - got a source for that "300 feet" claim you idiot?

  • Lying bastards! Bulid it and use it!

  • why would they need a nuke? the goal is the penetrate the bunker and blow up inside of it, a nuke would be overkill for an area of that size?

  • 3 million my ass

  • The Union of Concerned Scientists is an organization of the Left, in other words, this is Bullshit. Remember Nuclear Winter? Another piece of crap from this gang of shitheads.

  • Looks like its Nuclear Winter for us boys, Scientists think they know everything.

  • Did a comedian make this? Lmfao. This is just hilarious.

  • LOL! this is more comedic than informative.. the bunker buster is what it sounds like. A BUNKER BUSTER, not an atomic bomb that would kill 3 million people..

  • Sure, block the entrances... then they can use the "modern tunneling equipment" they previously mentioned to dig it back out. This is so stupid.

  • fucking bull shit you are a dumb ass for making this video

  • Who in their right mind use a MEGATON for this?! Of course, a much smaller yield will be used.

  • the b61 mod-11 is the nuclear bunker buster of choice for the usa it has a yield of only 400kt not 1mt, the united states retired the b53 because it was to large withe a yield of 9mt

  • Total bullshit. A bunkerbuster penetrates a hell of a lot more than "a few meters" do your homework !

  • this is so stupid. The U.S. would NEVER use this. Nuclear bombs are never detonated even close to ground.

  • Whoever did this knows nothing of nukes. DA

  • what a bullshit .... omg ... come on.

    tactical nukes will never have such a huge nuclear radiation.

  • Oh look mercenaries 2 thing

  • Comment removed

  • iran is constructing nuclear weapons of its own? why build nuclear weapons if its a peaceful country

  • @ELEMENTSFAN666 iran probobly have n-bombs if not making them but theirs no evidence apart from jews screaming all day to provoke and start a war. n-bomb is nothing to be happy about but countrys with n-bomb are less likely to be taken over and stolen. lets hope this weapon never gets used again and no more (blood for oil) oops libya.

  • If Iran attacks Israel and/or the United States, "Radioactive Fallout" in Iran and the Middle East will be a Mute Point! I think that the Union of Concerned Scientists should start demanding that Iran stop it's Nuclear Program as well as North Korea!

  • Comment removed

  • Most likely nukes will only be used for bunker busters if Iran nukes Israel first. Conventional warhead bunker busters can take out very deep bunkers. Do you think we would only drop ONE on a site? We will just keep dropping them in the craters and go deeper and deeper.

  • @coldfarted Israel needs nuked, because these jews are the whole reason we're stuck in these wars. We caught mossad rats dressed like arabs in a van full of explosives on 911. Just like the King David bombing, jews dressed like arabs. We should level Israel, shut down the jew owned federal reserve, the jewish wall street swindle, and start printing our own debt free money. Then we get rid of the jewish media, jewish hollywood and America could be great once again. Subverted Nation (dot net)

  • i think the idea of killing thousands of the enemy with their own chemical and bio weapons is a great idea. As for the UCS, none of them have the intelligence god gave a rat.

  • Also...

    How many Union of Concerned Scientist members does it take to change a light bulb? Non, UoCS can't change anything.

  • @cyberslick18, Well Said!!!! The only thing that the Union of Concerned Scientists can do (Aside from change the hand on the "Doomsday Clock") is get on a News Network & "Beat The Drum."

  • I agree that there are better methods for bunker breaking, but the proposed method in the video has failed countless times before. I mean honestly, don't you think that's what we are currently doing?

    That's the standard plan, the problem is it's simply impossible to know every exit and enter point in a defensive bunker without inside intelligence. Furthermore, any strategically valuable bunker (ESPECIALLY nuclear / bio) would have a system in place for a collapse.

    Right idea, bad video.

  • this vifeo is wrong they actualy explode in the air above ground so they dont make a big crater

  • @mercs2crazy If it is designed as a bunker buster it will have a delayed fuse and penetrate the ground before it explodes.

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    you say 70% is focused forward, 30% would still go all directions(force of 20 nagasakibombs), and the 70% blast would still bounce back, hot particles would rise to the skies. Its like pulling the pin of a handgrenade than putting it in a plastic bag. You must know that a missile doesnt have the kinetic power to penetrate deep below earths surface. If it could go 100mtrs deep it might be a different story, as it is now you have a nuke going off in a shallow pit.

  • @StrangeDeimos Guy, get the point that there ARE NO 1 mt bunker busters...and this is not the "coldwar era"

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    no, there arent, it was the plan though to use 'normal nuclear bombs' of high yield to destroy deep underground commandcenters. Like I pointed out this was one of the reasons to engeneer even higher yield nukes, cause there were these 'hubs' that couldnt be reached.

    It seems you have a hard time getting the point, cause it clearly was the plan to use icbms as bunker busters. do some reading. And the enviromental consequences would be devestating.

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    you were only right with you copy/paste of that specific bunkerbuster, for the most part you were totally wrong.

  • @StrangeDeimos Having fun spamming the comments? hahaha sheesh, that specific bunker buster, is what would be used TODAY...not the 50s, not the 60s, not the 70s...TODAY, get it? Don't see why you stray off topic so much, I was adressing the present day use of nukes in iran...much like *this* video.

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    never mind dude, you are obviously right. uh..... no you are not. I am not debating on what they use today to bust bunkers. Just because a weapon isnt designated to do a specific job doesnt mean it cant be used for it.

  • @StrangeDeimos of course they CAN use high yield stuff...Can't we get along and just send some delta operators in there =p

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    I would rather send bomberman, hes perfect for the mission. you would only need a 8bit console and a cartridge with the launchcodes.

  • @StrangeDeimos hahahah xD

  • @DACFalloutRanger

    this kind of blast is different from an underground test, in a test the blast is contained, i dont suppose this is the case with a bunkerbuster. Its impossible for rocket even to penetrate lets say 15mtrs of solid rock before detonation, best performing bunkerbuster were WW2 ones from the british, they could penetrate about 5m of concrete, how can you call that subsurface if you talking bout a nuclear explosion of a megaton?

  • COMMIE!!!!!!!!

  • Zulok1337...hey, genius, watch it again. The Union of Concerned Scientists created this video based on Pentagon info. Not me.

  • funny that they probably have hundreds of scientists working on this bomb who actually have reliable facts and know what they're talking about yet you make one video on youtube and you think you know all about radiation.

  • suck on that ragheads!

  • This video is so incredibly wrong on facts.

    1. B61 Mod 11 has a MAX yield of 340kt, though thought to be 10kt (1% of what they say in the video).

    2. 70% focused forward

    Put those together, it's equivalent to a ~100 kt blast AT MOST, only 10 percent of what this drivel says. These projections are so far off, it's pretty funny. I wonder why I've never heard about the "millions" that were killed in California, Colorado, Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma by the fallout from 928 nuclear tests.

  • @DACFalloutRanger High yield weapons were usually tested in poor island regions, not on usa mainland, that might be a reason. Also after optimal blast height, destruction patterns etc were established. i guess most of the tests were underground.

    reason why this might cause major death? maybe because its detonated in a densily populated area, as opposed to a desert or deserted island. its really not rocket science although it is.

  • Comment removed

  • @DACFalloutRanger fact is, you wrong, and have no concept of the scale of a nuclear explosion. Projections are for a megaton design, and yes with increasing depth of these bunkers in the coldwar era there were definetly plans to use mt yield designs to destroy underground command centers. one could even say increasing depth of bunkers and higher yield nuclear bombs went hand in hand like anti tank weapons and armor development. that 340kt would do nothing vs a deep underground bunker.

  • This video is bullshit the B-61 warhead can punch through 300meters of rock, earth and concrete because it has the ability focus 70% of its tiny .3Kt yield forward. That is like a 420,000 pound shaped charge.

    I'm not a Jew or a Zionist but I think wiping out Iran's nuclear program is a frikin swell Idea. I want to see those dingleberries crying in the streets over heir dead and puking their irradiated guts out.

  • @1138thz why...? they're people... they haven't done anything to anyone...

    personally, i'd like to see people like you wiped off the face of the earth. i think the world would be a lot better off without someone so hate filled for no good reason.

    Iran hasn't invaded any country in what? 200 years? it's nuclear ability is laughable. they haven't done anything to anyone. the only reason people push all that propaganda is because Iran is the 3rd largest source for Oil in the world. Iraq was #2.

  • @tansrn1

    It's too bad that you don't have the balls to wipe anyone off the face of the earth except in your delusional little dreams...bitch!.

    They haven't done anything to anyone? That's right Hezbollah (backed by Iran) isn't a terrorist organization. Actually Hezbollah builds new age water fountains..right?

    And just because Ahmadinejad says he wants to wipe Israel off the map and has the ability to make as much plutonium as he needs is no reason for concern.

  • What if we design a nuclear drill! that would be sweet. Maybe one you could drop from an airplane, that would be tighter!

  • lol this is pretty retarded. A. how would we know where these bunkers that are that deep are? But the funny thing is they asume we would build a nuclear bunker buster without designing a new bomb that could drill deeper. What is the point of this video, clearly the U.S. isn't going to drop a nuclear bomb intended to destroy nukes or chemical weapons deap in a bunker if the thing can't penetrate that deep. This is just trying to get people scared of the boogyman

  • @durhamdf the point of the video is that the US's true intention would be to kill people, not actually to attack a bunker.

  • @tansrn1 I don't think so, what is the advantage of detonating a nuke slightly underground as opposed to right at the surface? I think the intention was to destroy bunkers but the technology just wasn't there.

  • John the Revelator saw the winners of the last blow up standing on a sea of glass playing their guitars and singing a victory song called "The Song of Moses".

    Better shape up Iran before it's too late. It may already be too late.

    Great Satan is going to stomp Little Satans behind till it burns.

    "Oh Mary Dont You Weep No More, Oh Mary Dont You Weep No More?

  • I think that biological agents could not survive a nuclear attack

  • Fucking hippies... Drop it! Hell, drop that fucker twice!

  • It should deter the perps.

  • do your fucking homework people....fall out does not spread underground like that unless it contaminates a water source...on top of that something with a 1MEGATON yield is barely shit.....lets use our brains and do some fucking home work you morons

  • @subatomikproduktions tell your government then to detonate one on your back yard.. it wold make nice fireworks however..

  • @tibchy144

    they did detonate that shit all over the Arizona desert, very large ones aswell. 

  • @subatomikproduktions

    does not spread like what? You have a brain defect? They show a radioactive cloud you moron not somekind of underground spread of radioactive material. jeez. plus one megaton is HUGE, what an imbecile you are, you are the one that should do some homework. 1 mt is huge overkill to destroy a bunker, thats a city leveling explosion, 65 times bigger than the hiroshima bomb. Now go and do your homework you stupid fuck

  • @StrangeDeimos

    TBH nothing wrong with a nuclear bunker buster. 500 ton nuclear bomb would be about right.

  • @boarderx113

    i responded to a guy saying one megaton is nothing, 500t is 1/2000 of a megaton bomb and probably wont even reach 20 metres into the ground so it isnt "about right" in many cases it wont be enough.

  • @StrangeDeimos

    I do know my physics mate, M = 10^6 and whatnot. But It would be enough, as you see here, the bomb isn't exploding on the surface, it's penetrating the earth then exploding, Confining the explosive in a hole such as being displayed increases the damage of the bomb, and yes 500ton would fuck up a bunker underground..

  • @boarderx113

    ehm, they say here a mt nuclear device schockwave would reach 300m deep, 500t really wouldnt do anything to an important underground complex those would be buried to deep in the ground to reach with a 500ton device.

  • Lordy! There's a lot of people posting comments who really need proffessional help.

  • Without getting into a political arguement, there are a few things wrong with this. Present coventional bunker busters use the kinetic energy of the weapon drop, plus the warhead is fired like a gun from the main body for increased penetration.

  • What a nonsence. In Gulf War I, they allready reached depths about 90m + without primedetonator. It were converted cannonbarrels of M114's. I think a union of relatively concerned scientist should know that.

  • wow this sounds like a great idea since every country mentioned is nothing more then a cancer to mankid

  • there is no way it would kill 3000000 people fucking Chernobyl only killed maybe a few thousand. which were mostly the people who cleaned it up so no that's bs.

  • SHOOT AMERICA SHOOT FOR PETROL FOR MONEY YOU AMERICANS HUMAN ? 

  • if its killing millions,... at least its killing millions of enemys.

  • 1 megaton, isn't that a bit large for a bunker buster?

  • Bomb Iran for Isreal. Fuck that. Bomb Israel for Iran.

  • All theories work to the favor of the opponent/proponent.... in a cartoon.

  • So we don't want to use that bomb because it'll poison all the other countries in the middle east?............America should care why?

  • screw all of the nukes just call chuk norris he can fukin end all of this with bitch slap

  • I say we let only the Israeli's deal with this attack, We, the USA will just sit back and hopefully watch Israel have it's filthy ass hand to to it. Notice I said it instead of her or him. I meant that. Israel is a thing of waste, greed, treachery, lies. It has no humanity. Nuke em till the minoras glow!!

  • Stop the liberal propaganda. No such plans. No such weapon. Would be PGM's the entire way...and WILL be, when the time comes.

    And could be done in such a way, that no one would know its the USA. But that would defeat the point.

    Rogue nations need to know who's in charge...as does the rest of the world. If no one steps up to the plate, Jihadists will run amok. People...you are aware that this is a jihad, don't you? And the israelis/jews are hiding behind, and dragging us into it.

  • You only talk about US , waht about if they do that to Israel ??? STupid...

  • @PRarmy82 You make no sense whatsoever. You part of the MFA?

  • dump video............ a nuke bunker buster ? a conventional bomb bunker buster ! maybe these are the scientists were leftout from the project that make history on

    making a bomb in such short notice... what could took scientists years to do the

    researched.... it only took... these group of scientists months !!! so be jealous just

    because your a88 didnt assinged to the project ! good thing you didnt get the job cause then... maybe it be after a decade.. you ll come up with something lame!

  • @atinlockup Another Double-Digit-IQ trying to understand the clip and comment on it. Let an adult explain it to you, and the genesis of the info.

  • This is just such bullshit.

  • Wow who ever made this is retarded...bombing the exits and entrances? LOL @ at, theyll make more you F-tard thats almost as bad as the BP ideas

  • we all waiting on a nucleair war with USA+EU VS CHINA+RUSLAND ... . and the winner wil be, nobody cus then we all death by blowing up the earth

  • Take out Iran, Afghanistan AND Pakistan... damn what arewe waiting for ?

  • @cesky69 Ya, no shit huh!

  • @cesky69 What are we waiting for? For you to sign up.

  • @BubbaLouis Been there dude, served my time and would go back and pulle the trigger if asked to do so. If some "bubbas" and their families were kilt SO WHAT?

    Better them than me.

  • Fuck it We need to just destroy them wipe them clean off the planet we dont care for them

  • @dillonshuffel Spoken like a true Zionist.

  • @BubbaLouis Here here!!

  • @BubbaLouis that's right, you shoot a rabid dog and neo Nazis must be dispatched with similar haste and efficiency.

  • @dillonshuffel Wipe the middle east into one big parking lot!

  • @dillonshuffel

    you stupid you think iran is a toy kid you can just throw in the bin.this is war they will defend themselves look at the struggle of irak and iran is not irak they have a powerful army with misiles who can reach all the us bases in neighbour coutry and could hit the petrol sites from where we get our petrol. learn before talking like a kid

  • @MegaSab100 Actually your wrong... If we launched our nukes right now it would reach them in only a couple minutes... they wouldn't have time to react once the nukes reach their horizon. And Iraq Doesn't have a single nuke yet... it was stated couple years ago they said; " Once Iraq gets there hands on nuclear weapons they will make missiles and when complete they will use them..." I guarantee in about 4 years we will be at war with Iraq...

  • @dillonshuffel

    Hitler would be so proud of you

  • @dillonshuffel are you high?! or just G.W bush's grade of retarded

  • @burn19ballz

    George bush can eat shit, he's stupid Look were he put us in this fucking economy. Bush would be too scared to even press the nuke button..

  • @dillonshuffel whos we ?

  • Gee! All those who threaten us with Nukes get comtaminated. Go figure..... Hey, live by the sword, die by the sword. 'Live in Peace?" You need to go speak at the UN. Let me know how it goes.

  • @torch39 Who threatened us with nukes? If you're implying Iran then you need to read Yossi Melman and Meier Javadanfar's book. The Israelis made all this up and had the Iranian terrorist group MEK announce it as true.

  • @BubbaLouis ONE book turned out by apologists for the enemy and you are willing to capitulate? What is this, your version of "peace in our time"? Maybe you should check out the fate of Neville Chamberlain, and the fate of Europe after he said that. The Arab Jihad dates to the Barbary Wars, and the LAST EIGHT US PRESIDENTS have been attacked by them, and responded with military force, since Nixon in 1968. 1972 Olympics, Assassinated RFK, USS COLE, Lebanon Barracks, Need more?