Woot woot louis c.k. is fat and sweaty and traumatizes his children by being a public pervert and smelling like greasy puss and being an unfit dad, but he is right on the money with this asstoot observation. Goes to show you that some people can be completely incapable of living and still be cool/smart.
To paraphrase Bill Hicks, have you ever noticed that creationists generally look unevolved? Cro-magnon brow line, hunched posture, spouting things like "I believe god created me in 1 week."
Evolutionary Biologists predicted that for a human to evolve from a great Ape, one pair of Chromosomes simply had to fuse, for us to posess one less pair. They accepted if that was not found, the theory was dead. Would you believe it? When the technology arrived to check that, there it is the fused base pair giving us 23 instead of 24. How amazing that god planted that to trick us and make it looked like we evolved from apes. Why waste so much time trying to get people to accept him....
@RitzDaCracker1 Humans did not evolve from Monkeys, but an Ape-like ancestor. Theres a big difference; Monkeys are small and not so intelligent, Apes are much larger and more intelligent. Monkeys and apes still exist because there is still an evolutionary need for them in nature.
the only thing i dont get about evolutions is, if monkeys evovlved, why are there still monkeys? if some of the species gets left behind and dont evolve, then why arent there caveman dudes walking around still? WHy did only the Monkey stage not fully evolve? Can anyone answer that?
@RitzDaCracker1 look up the richard dawkins video about that. It's a very simple answer actually, youtube comments are just not good enough for it. Again, there is a very specific Dawkins video on just that.
@RitzDaCracker1 Why not study it instead of asking in youtube comments. Short answer: you're looking at it in a way that's too linear. We share a common ancestor with the great apes. Speciation is when species essentially split off from one species into another. as far as the "caveman dudes" they're not around b/c they weren't adapted well enough to survive. homo sapiens were the best adapted, so we dominated the others and/or the others died out.
@RitzDaCracker1 BECAUSE WE ARE NOT MONKEYS! We have a common ancestor, but we ARE NOT MONKEYS. It's like asking why lizards haven't evolved into dinosaurs right about now. Evolution takes years and years of adaptation and DNA alterations/mutations to create new groups of organisms. How about you go get some "edjamacation" from one of those fancy learnin' schools and become informed on these topics?
@RitzDaCracker1 1. Monkeys around today are the evolved form of a similar ancestor. 2. Humans are not evolved from monkeys, but rather from that similar ancestor. 3. Evolution doesn't quite work that way. There are many mechanisms in evolution including natural selection, genetic mutation, etc. 99% of all species that have existed are extinct. Extinction happens constantly in geological time. cavemen are believed to be human species, just early in our evolutionary history. We are still evolving
I like you and have no reason not to. I like you and have no reason not to :) Hey did you hear about that magical baby born in Bethlehem? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH dead.
i dont understand why there is such a contraversy.....evolution is a fact and yes it does contradict the bible so ppl have the need to deny it. but we also know that the earth is round, something that also contradicts the bible.....in fact most 21st century science contradicts the bible.The scientific community is in concensus that its fact, and ill take 21st century scientists opinions on science over bronze age literature anyday and its silly not to.
This was like a conversation with my Dad after explaining evolution to him multiple times when he says I ain't no monkey it just makes him look like more of one b/c any person with a brain and a 6th grade level education should be able to grasp the concept of evolution.
@WilliamTyndale1 At least you can comprehend the theory and can therefore make your mind up about whether you think it's right or wrong. My Dad has a little wall built up in his head and just cannot understand the theory. I'd be fine with him continuing, like I know he will, thinking it's a theory but I wish he'd open up to an explanation.
@mavinajfan " At least you can comprehend the theory" No he can't. anything he knows about it he got from websites trying to "debunk" evolution. he hasn't studied it at all, it's obvious.
@WilliamTyndale1 Yeah... because biology is implausible. If you find it implausible, you don't understand it. Go read that bible again and tell me which makes more sense.
@WilliamTyndale1 einstein found quantum theory implausible. later in his life he had to admit it was valid. this shows that even experts in the field can be wrong about theories. the difference between you and einstein, besides the genius part, is 1. he was actually a scientist and an expert in his field. 2. he was intellectually honest.
@XGod0 You are right about that. There is no other side. What kind of God would it be if he only sent people to Heaven for believing in him? What a stupid notion. It has the fingerprints of humanity all over it. "Believe it or you won't go to this awesome place with gardens and rainbows after you die! Oh, but we have absolutely no evidence for this. In fact all the evidence is against it." That is the way most mentally capable people see it.
@karim3343 Well based on my interpretation of Christian beliefs not only must you believe in God, the Son, and the Holy spirit, but you must merit the moral values and obey the teachings. Simply believing in God and sining nonstop with no sense of remorse or intention to do better will still result in a rather unpleasant afterlife.
@XGod0 And yet, you could be the best person in the history of the planet... Giving your life to save children, and other people. STILL, not enough, and at the end of the day, you will be burned in Hell for having a different opinion about the universe. What a ridiculous and abhorrent way to view other people. I'm just happy that most Christians today forgot about all the despicable verses in their Bible, unlike Muslims. If Christians today really did follow, then they would be as bad as Muslims
@karim3343 Well the first testament is where a lot of controversy arises, and in actuality that book has more weight in the eyes of Jews versus Christians. Certain areas of the scripture is meant to be interpreted literally while others symbolic and metaphoric. In addition, those in power (Illuminati for example) have altered the contents over centuries to misinform/construe the true teachings to create more conflict and divide the population. I believe in Jesus's teachings and the power of love
@skershaw2000 Yes because Nazis were persecuting Muslims. And no, I don't group all Muslims as bad. My ENTIRE family is Muslim, so screw off with your preconceived notions. I'm ignorant because I find the Babble to be a set of moral ideals only fit for barbaric cavemen? Just give me the word and I'll pull a dozen Babble verses from memory. But you don't want that do you?
@skershaw2000 That is obviously not true. There is always a dis-proportionality in crime, violence, war, poverty, education, literacy, etc. when it comes to culture/religion. Don't be politically correct with me and say everyone has the exact same beliefs. That is bullshit! Today for example, Muslims ARE responsible for most of the wars on the planet; that is a fact! 8 out of the 10 current "low intensity conflicts" are perpetrated by Muslim nations. And my entire family is Muslim, so enough.
@skershaw2000 I don't think it is possible to know the genuine beliefs of the leaders of Al Queda. I do know that their existence depends on belief in god. They rely on Mosques and religious persuasion for recruitment and strong faith in Allah in recruiting suicide bombers.
I am sure that without religion, people still would have fought wars. However, only faith can convince good people that they are doing the right thing. Without it, only evil people would commit evil acts.
@skershaw2000 You can see examples of belief being used as the front man for wars although they may have an alternate objective. Look at the crusades as easily the most recognizable holy war. Regardless of the power gained of the resources gained or land conquered, the war was operated under the flag of religion, And many of the wars supporters supported the war primarily because of the religious connotations. Your turn.
@skershaw2000 YES, top leadership of Al-Qaeda DO believe in God. Don't you dare tell me they do not. Two of my good friends are Musa and Haroun Bin Laden. Their uncle was the infamous Osama Bin Laden. I know people in the Muslim Brotherhood; in fact the son of the former leader (Ali Al-Swedey) is a good friend of mine. I know the radicalists and terrorists viewpoints on MOST things, so don't try to outwit me on that.
@skershaw2000 Really? Then Google them. They are not famous at all. I went to CAC (Cairo American College) with them from Kindergarten to my senior year. I don't care if you act like that's impossible, just ask them yourself. Here is his twitter feed @HaroonBinladin. Just Google it and click on his Twitter feed. Ask him if he went to school with Karim Al-Sharif (my name) or just look at his friends and you'll see my brother (Joe Al-Sharif). I've done more than enough to prove it to you.
@Pleendriver ?? Umm, that was my point. It was a little bit of sarcasm because of what skershaw2000 said. He called me a Nazi for stereotyping Muslims (which I did not attempt to do in the first place).
@lukaskaetano - Nah - I'd rather live vicariously through you. Do you swallow? I bet to you "Life ith FABOULITH" - hahahhaha - fag. Tell me honestly - when you're all ALONE, in your room, sitting in the DARK - do you have peace? Joy? Feel loved? OR do you feel sad, lonely, anxiety, fear & depression? Let me guess - HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!
I do believe in creation but he's still right, MOST people that argue sound completely rediculous because they haven't looked into it, they just pick a side.
"mom said god exists someone else said he didn't... mom also said santa claus exists..."
Ohh, I love Louis CK. (seriously, I saw him live and almost suffocated by laughter) I believe God created everything, but man he is spot on. There are a lot of people who do say really dumb sounding things like that. A lot of people believe stuff that they don't know how to defend, (on all sides), and in this world where science rules, its easy to sound dumb defending creationism.
@ldoooooggggg Listen.. I"m not the one that is limiting my open-mindedness to "only" the physical realm... I wasn't home schooled butnhow deosn't that have any difference. I alsmot wish that I would've have been sometimes.
@TheBBear86 science does not rule the world look at the american gov. everyone on youtube loves ron paul but he doesnt even believe in evolution a presidential nomiinee
@Khrystoffar This kind of "comedy" is inherently divisive. You would find far more derisive comments from those who would be offended by a clip that contained a caricature of evolutionary theology that goes, "I think most ppl who argue against creationism sound really stupid. Because most ppl who actually argue against it say things like 'In the beginning there was Nothing...and then it exploded.'"
I have yet to find an evo who was anything but outraged by that short summary of their position.
@LogicalF4ll4cY There you go..thank you for proving my point :) You couldn't help but be irked by what you took as a gross mischaracterization of your beliefs so you commented.
Didn't prove anything actually. Don't mistake curiosity of why one would get mad at that statement for someone actually getting mad. I was stating that one would have to have either no sense of humor about what they believe or a very short fuze. The example was merely a mockery of how silly it sounds and what I expect its opposite would be for the opposing view. I don't know why someone would get upset over it except for reasons previously mentioned.
@WilliamTyndale1 I get what you're saying. But my main deal is that there are vids that have that type of forum. Because most of the people that comment on these vids are all talking opinion and have no intent on changing their way of thinking. So to me it makes ZERO sense to have a religious argument if no one is going to be changed and especially since most ppl came here because the guy's a comedian. Not saying that ppl shouldn't respond if u feel strong enough, but choose your battles.
@Khrystoffar To that, if it is applied both ways (as I think you intend it), I heartily agree. Take for instance Christian worship songs on youtube. Probably NOT the forum for debate, yet many of them, esp. those with quite a few views, are absolutely cluttered with atheist comments denigrating Christians and God. If only the "tolerant" could be more tolerant,lol
@WilliamTyndale1 lol, exactly what i'm saying and some people are forgetting that no one is forcing them to comment. Then those same people get mad when someone responds. smh, lol
@WilliamTyndale1 I'd imagine that many of those commenters live in countries where Christians enforce their religion on people through laws and other means. No, it isn't an appropriate venue, but sometimes intolerance is reactionary.
@AstoriaRego I am very curious to hear any stories of you or others having had Christianity enforced on you through laws and other means. Quite intriguing. I had heard of Islamic states doing this, but wasn't aware that it was happening in traditionally Christian countries.
I was always under the impression that it was only in traditionally Christian countries (as opposed to Atheist regimes or Islamic states) where rights to freedom of speech and religion were honored?
@WilliamTyndale1 1. DOMA. 2. Prohibitions on gay marriage. 3. DADT. 4. Blue laws. 5. Until recently, lack of access to OTC emergency birth control. 6. Historical prohibitions on abortion. 7. Laws requiring Sunday closure of businesses, and case law denying exemption to Jews. 8. Tax exemption for religions. 9. denial of alcohol permits based on proximity to churches. 10. Efforts to curb pagans in the military from equal access to religious practice.
@AstoriaRego You 4got laws against pedophilia,bestiality&necrophilia.Ought2throw that on this list2round it out.Sounds like hedonism has really just been shut right down, lol
Of course,1 of the most heinously offensive acts is when they put their nativity scenes out, that just SCREAMS intolerance.
I've got an idea.Why don't atheists&sodomites&baby butchers band together,raise up the cash&buy one of the third world tropical islands over its head in debt and found their own"free&tolerant"society?
@WilliamTyndale1 We have laws against non-consensual sexual relationships because they cause harm. My list was of behaviors that do not cause harm, but are legislated because people want to impose their religious values on society as a whole.
I think I'll just stay here in the U.S. and help it become the country it could be - the one that was founded based on freedom of religion and whose constitution guarantees freedom from invidious discrimination.
@AstoriaRego Well if that's your attitude...by all means stay :)
You do realize that those that founded this country (16th-19th century) were the ones who put in place the laws you listed as being intolerant? Maybe not the exact wording that existed in more modern times, but if anything, far more stringent against perversion. You might do well to study what makes a strong country and what caused the collapse of ancient Rome. We are on a nearly parallel course. One more generation, two at most.
Let me ask you this: Do you accept/believe evolutionary theory? Do you reject the Judeo-Christian God?
If you do not accept the living God, why would you want to have anything to do with the institution He ordained? Marriage makes absolutely NO sense in a strictly secular, hedonistic, evolutionary, survival-of-the-fittest paradigm where the "strongest and fittest" take as many mates as possible in order to reproduce and strengthen and advance the stock...
@WilliamTyndale1 Marriage predated monotheism. Granted, it was originally a pagan institution, but it has a strong secular purpose. It makes a lot of sense in a secular society, since it grants a host of important legal rights.
Pagans ripped off the original. There was never a time in the history of mankind when at least some of the race did not worship the one, true God. I don't expect you to accept that, however. But I would like to see what REAL concrete proof you have to back up that claim. Even in your paradigm, there is a huge gap between the motivations of ancient pagans and those of modern man (of the past couple generations) that you have glossed over.
@AstoriaRego "...since it grants a host of important legal rights."
It has only been during the past few generations that mankind has started to think of marriage in terms of "rights," and it has only been approx. 100 years in this country since marriage was an institution of the state (the first mistake). Certainly there has to be better reasons for getting married than to take advantage of tax breaks? What would homosex couples want in way of rights? Children?
@WilliamTyndale1 Evolution is a scientific fact, not a behavioral dictate. There are plenty of things that would make me more fit for survival that I do not partake in. Just because my ancestors increased genetic strength by having many mates doesn't mean I have to make the same choices.
@AstoriaRego "Evolution is a scientific fact, not a behavioral dictate."
So at what point during our long, slow crawl out of the primordial ooze was the hierarchichal structure evident in most mammal family prides, packs and herds (wherein only the most dominant are given breeding rights) abandoned in favor of a marriage system, and how exactly was this permitted by and alright with the dominant males? And can your beliefs be substantiated by real, scientific fact?
Perhaps you justify your "tolerant" position on abortion by saying, "If you don't like abortion, then don't have one*." and "If you don't like sex, then don't have it."
(Implying that those who point to God's law that sex outside of your marriage partner is sin don't "like" sex.),
*Never mind that our govt uses the tax dollars of BOTH pro-life&pro-death people2finance the abortion industry.How tolerant is THAT??
How about,"If u hate life&taking responsibility4ur actions,&u hate the Originator of life so much that u want the legal right2rip the arms off&suck the brains out of the skulls of infants it in the womb,then don't have sex"(e.g.Don't engage in God's institution of sexual union whereby life is conceived thereby cutting the opportunity4life to nil)?
@WilliamTyndale1 I'm sorry, I don't understand your last post. Is there any way you could write it in plain English?
As to abortion, the analogy is not apt. The criticism against abortion is that it takes the life of a third party, and thereby causes harm. There is no tangible harm alleged by gay marriage; no third party is hurt and you are unaffected by it.
If you hate life, if you hate taking responsibility for your actions, if you hate the Originator of life so much that u want the legal "right" to rip the arms off & suck the brains out of the skulls of infants in the womb, then don't have sex"
(e.g.Don't engage in God's institution of sexual union whereby life is conceived, thereby cutting the opportunity to bring forth life to nil)
@AstoriaRego If they were given the "right" to children, I would certainly argue that many children (as third parties) would be hurt by showing them that perversion was "natural." If you are conditioned to think of gay "rights" as civil rights, remember, there are thousands of former gays who have come to Christ, and NOT ONE "former black" or "former Hispanic" or "former Asian,"etc. & if u insist that some people are just "born gay," you are implying that we do not CHOOSE who we have sex with.
@AstoriaRego Ought we to recognize the "right" of a pedophile to have sex with a five-year-old, simply because he is "attracted" to him? Would the rationale that they were "just born that way" fly then?
NOTE: This is NOT a call to "legislate the bedroom." What gays and sexual deviant individuals of all kinds do to one another as "consenting adults" behind closed doors is between them and the God they will one day answer to.
@AstoriaRego But they are demanding that they be given the "right" to participate in the institution of matrimony that was given to mankind by the very God they refuse to obey. This seems to me to be utmost intolerance and hypocrisy, though, certainly our culture has a million excuses to justify it, as they do the rest of their behavior.
Also, this is not to be misconstrued as part of the non-biblical "God hates fags" ideology that some have adapted to justify their hatred.
@WilliamTyndale1 The institution of marriage predates written history. Since Judaism began after written history began, we can know that marriage was not created by Judeo-Christians even if we do not understand its origin.
Regardless, marriage has important secular purposes, and has been established as a civil right in the U.S. It is therefore unethical to deny it to a particular group of people without good reason. The fact that it violates your religion is not enough.
@AstoriaRego God loves ALL mankind, and while we have not all engaged in sodomy, we HAVE all sinned against God and come short of His perfection. We ALL need to accept Christ as our savior. God condemns ALL sin and there is only one way to escape the righteous judgment of the infinitely just Creator: Through the precious blood of Jesus Christ who gave Himself for our sins.
God loves gays, even the most militant, just as He loves all mankind.
@AstoriaRego But God HAS given us guidelines to live within in order that we might have peace and fulfillment in this life. When a man and a woman are joined IN Him, they no longer seek to just have their "needs met," but to give of themselves and treat each other as they would want to be treated, loving each other with the love of God. And to pervert this sacred union by making it a "covenant" between two people of the same sex is about as much of an insult as you could give its Originator.
@AstoriaRego It is in a category even above those who piss on gravestones and burn flags because those symbols are man-made and marriage is God-made.
Now, if God is not a reality in your life, you are not likely to agree. But you were born in a country founded by people who DID believe these things. You will not find the freedom to dissent in an Islamic state or an Atheist regime. Only in historically Christian cultures have basic rights and freedoms been granted. But these are never enough.
@WilliamTyndale1 Some of those who founded my country were Christians, some were deists and emphatically non-Christian. Regardless of the religious beliefs of these authors, we have kept the rights and structure they created because of the inherent goodness of the government it results from.
I believe in continuing to establish the best and fairest system possible knowing what we do now. Their religion isn't relevant to that.
@WilliamTyndale1 "I have yet to find an evo who was anything but outraged by that short summary of their position" outraged? no. a singularity isn't "nothing" and you're talking about cosmology, not evolutionary theory. so probably you get ragged on because you sound like a retarded child talking to adults.
@BillKiernan OK Bill, if the singularity WAS Something, what was it? How did it get there? What force put the tremendous amount of energy into it that the Big Bang Theory requires? And if you say 'IDK,' is your faith still science?
@Khrystoffar You can always just not read the argumentative comments. It's ludicrous to complain of other people's behavior when you are exposing yourself to it.
All you argumentative and stubborn people ruin Louis's stand-up. It's comedy, therefore you take it with a grain of salt no matter what you believe in. If you don't like it, don't watch it and shut up
@mchandler2112 LOL- That's just nonsense now isn't it. I will admit that LCK does hit it on the head. But I do think that this is changing with many wanting to know more about defending their faith.
Hey guys... I have an idea!? Why don't we all join in on the badwagan and act like school kids, calling names for someone that doesn't believe in the foolishnish that we do. Then we can all have fun acting like the apes that we think that we are..." You guys are idiots..... LOL- Childish ones at that. I Swear, you guys come out of the woodwork on youtube like flies on shit when a anti-evotard speaks up. I bet most of you haven't even read past 2 pages of comments becasue you're to lazy...
@crazy77iii Yeah, people who believe in evolution are retards, aren't they. That's right, most scientists are retards, isn't that right? 99% of geneticists and biologists are idiots when it comes to science. Seriously, do you hear what you're saying? You're calling the entire science community idiots. Here's an idea; why don't you go and pay a visit to the guys at The National Academy of Sciences and explain to them how "retarded" they are. Why don't you go and school all those dumb scientists!
@cornflakeclusters Let me ak you something... Do you think that it's possible for a group of people to go insane? A whole country? How about the entire World? If not, then picture hitlers "group".
I thought maybe Louis C.K. would explain how evolution works in this clip. Alas, he does no such thing. "Did you read the thing?" Thought-provoking stuff.
@GewgleTubeExplorer Why would he do that? Richard Dawkins does a great job of that. I like the segment. He's highlighting the absurdity of those who deny evolution based on straw man arguments and strident incredulity. It's good for people - not all of whom think like you - to have it made simple and obvious how ridiculous the debate over evolution is, namely that there is no debate.
@crazy77iii "YOu can laugh all that you want at the words that I type but no matter how hard you laugh at them they will Still Reign True Forever and Ever"
You believe in talking donkeys, zombies and flying people. These things never happened, you're deluded. You're a religious maniac, you hate science and you believe in ridiculous fairy-tales that are based on no evidence. You think religious websites are more reliable than actual science and you're immune to logic. Fuck off.
@crazy77iii "Divine Proof written 100's to 1000's of years before science was even in the minds of Humans, In Ancient Scriptures that have Passed the Test of time"
The fact that the Bible was created during a primitive time is even more reason not to take it seriously. It was written by people who didn't know anything, why would I pay it any credence? The Bible is just made-up nonsense.
Hinduism is even older than Christianity, does that mean Hinduism is true?
@cornflakeclusters "The fact that the Bible was created during a primitive time " You are not even understanding what you just Implied and Proved... The Bible, which you think was written by supposedly primitive man, predicted Looooong before genetics were even invented that they would be invented and not to "Give Heed" to them as it would only "Miniter questions" instead "Godly Edifying". Tell me how this is possible?
@crazy77iii There are two ways to live life. You can live according to reason - the same faculty that has brought you computers, the internet, medicine, everything you value in life, the theory of evolution. The other way is to live without reason, according to what others simply tell you is reality - the same strategy that results in things like mass starvation, brutality, and genocide. Evolution is fact, and mere incredulity - the strategy of evolution deniers - is not enough to disprove it.
@scientrophic Please don't forget it was the Union of the Militant Godless that perfected "mass starvation, brutality and genocide" in the Ukrainian Holodomor 80 years ago. And likewise today the secular-zionist NATO countries are among the most brutal in implementing aerial firebombing and starvation-sanctions which affect mostly civilian populations. When Orthodox Christians and Muslim theists protest to these un-Christ-like injustices are we not using our reasoning faculties?
@GewgleTubeExplorer Of course you would be! But that's a different subject altogether. I find it interesting how fast you changed from saying that he doesn't explain evolution to claiming that atheists are "brutal" and "unjust" the moment someone said that he doesn't need to explain. If you want to know what evolution is, you can. There are many excellent resources out there, from the Internet to your library. I would have expected you to know this already, but maybe I overestimated you.
@GewgleTubeExplorer State religions that worship an ideology or a leader are just that - religions that require one to suspend reason and just do what you're told. Be careful: just because it correlates with a state-organized rejection of mainstream religions so that the state can dominate the will of the people does not pin reason with the responsibility. Reasoning based on false facts - e.g. the gypsies are killing the economy - may as well be faith. Secular-zionism? You need to unpack that.
@GewgleTubeExplorer Oh wow, you're blaming the atrocities committed by Israel on atheists? Let's see, Israeli settlers (who are religious zealots) are responsible for stealing land that was previously owned by Palestinians and the entire premise for Zionism is from the Bible (Genesis 15:18-21). The main funder of Israel is America (a mostly Christian country that has never had an atheist leader). How is any of this the fault of atheists?
@scientrophic See this is were Many are wrong. Evoluiton is not in the same catagory as the others. Just because Variation can be observal doesn't make Evolution Anything More Than Just That.....
@crazy77iii Just answer one question: have you actually studied all of the research behind evolution? Have you studied it at a college level? Don't say anything else. Just answer the question: to what extent have you actually looked into this scientific subject?
@scientrophic Deeply. As much as some may beg to differ. :o) I'm sure that there is only a fraction of a percent of people, especially on YT that can say that they have studied ALL areas of science.
@scientrophic Have you Studied All Areas of Science, with a degree in every area? reason being is that you first quoted the same phrase that I've seen many, Many, MANY times by YTers... It's common.
@crazy77iii Yes, I have a degree in neuroscience and I am currently undertaking graduate studies. Have you read Origin of Species? Any of the academic literature? Are you familiar with digital evolution? No theory is material, and therefore does not "exist" in one sense. You're just playing semantics here. Entropy doesn't "exist", but it does. Evo describes a process that matter undergoes. Macro-evo is not a term. Define it.
@scientrophic That's Very commendable! I bet you are one smart cookie. ;o)
I have read Origin of Species and it's garbage. Liek I've told others, it's a "fun" idea that allows one to feel free of feeling accountable from the afterlife but brother... I"m telling you... HOW is it possible for "just a book" written thousands of years ago, to predict so everything that it has So Finely detailed and accurately? I don't think it is possible without Divinity. It even calls out evolution in 1 Timothy..
@crazy77iii We don't believe in evolution because it makes us "feel free of feeling accountable from the afterlife", we believe in evolution because it's a proven scientific explanation for the origin of organisms. Religion is an emotional security blanket; people believe in religion because the thought of an afterlife makes them feel all warm and fuzzy. The idea that when you die, you float off to paradise is a comforting belief that helps people sleep at night. But it's just bullshit.
@cornflakeclusters See you and all of the rest of group are failing to regocnize is that you belive in an explaination that is "Suppsedly proven" by Many, Many Many, Assumptions. but that still is good enough for you. I don't think that scientists are idiots by the way. Although, I do think that a world can become so self indulged an arrogant that the fail to recognize the actual truth of "What" we actually are. You all say that we are "deluded" but you guys are too. There's no way around it.
@cornflakeclusters You believing in evolution must amke you warm and fussy inside as well. Otherwise why would you even need to "know". There is something inside all of us, no matter who you are, that has a deep inevitable desure to "know" why and how we are here and for what purpose. Don't you find it very odd that we are the only Creature that is Asking these questions about ourselves? Why did mutate, in the same envrionment, WAY past every other life form on this earth, IF evo is true?
We haven't 'mutated way past' as all we have over the primates is a better developed central nervous system but we can't fly, aren't the strongest, have no sting or camouflage.
We've become self aware, that is all, and can form abstract thoughts so we can plan things, thats it.
There is SO much evidence for evolution that is you don't believe it ya aint studied it and all because some arsehole priest said you'd party into eternity with your skydaddy.
@Rockster969 "We've become self aware, that is all, and can form abstract thoughts so we can plan things, thats it. " "That's IT" huh? WOW, you really need to get outside and look around. Tell me please, if that's it and we are a race that has merely evolved from an ancester of apes, then why is it that the First Languages are Only within the Past 6k years? And don't throw this crap out about Dated proof past that either.. Cause that is all nonsense. Explain Subjective Experience!? (ie. Souls)
@crazy77iii "Why did mutate, in the same envrionment, WAY past every other life form on this earth, IF evo is true?"
We just happened to have evolved more advanced brains. Humans' forte is intelligence in the same way that a cheeter's forte is agility and speed. Humans just have very evolved brains. What's so confusing about that?
If you're saying that people who believe in evolution are deluded, then you're calling the whole science community deluded. You're just so wrong.
@cornflakeclusters Evolution is yeilded from chance. No? It's all relevent if you look at all areas of science at once, as one big explaination. If one concedes that "maybe" God did create us, but then follows up with evo explains how God created us... That is Theistic evolution and that deosn't follow what the Bible says in Genesis. Some say, "Abiogenesis has nothing to do with how evolution works". but indeed it is relevant as IF Abiogenesis is Explained by God, then we are as he Created us.
@scientrophic P.S. I don't understand how YOU of all people in science can sit and Think about how Each of our multi-trillion cells has a Neuron Fiber attached to it and then say. "Defintely must have been by chance...". I'm assuming this as you being versed in that field, would have to be pretty intelligent, therefore wouldn't also Claim Theistic-evolution. Cause that its completely condradictory to what God portrays to us in Genesis.
@vidfest Here let me stoop to your level... " I was here first" and "they started it!" LOL Take a hike... or contribute to the conversation in a mature and intelligent manner...
@scientrophic "computers, the internet, medicine, etc.." Those are things that we can observe and are Made by man and Real things. Unlike Macro-evo. Which is nonexistent...
@crazy77iii The Bible mentions genetics? Tell me more, I've never heard about this before. I'm assuming that you're going to tell me about an extremely vague passage from the Bible and proceed to interpret it to mean whatever you want it to mean.
@cornflakeclusters Yes it does. There is NO Interpreation needed. It's Very Clear what it says.... (JKV) 1 Timothy 1:4 "neither give heed to Endless Fables and "Genealogies...".
@crazy77iii This is amazing, you are just flat-out denying the fact that most scientists believe in evolution. You can believe in creationism all you want, fine, but don't deny that nearly all scientists believe in evolution.
Taking into account only those working in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences, there are about 480,000 scientists, but only about 700 believe in "creation-science". Why aren't you getting this?
I don't know what I expected to see when I scrolled on down to the comments section, but I should have seen the religious argument coming.
RandomTask3000 17 hours ago
Woot woot louis c.k. is fat and sweaty and traumatizes his children by being a public pervert and smelling like greasy puss and being an unfit dad, but he is right on the money with this asstoot observation. Goes to show you that some people can be completely incapable of living and still be cool/smart.
beautifulbabyandrew 21 hours ago
Is it odd if I find this man very attractive...maybe I'm just ovulating...eh either way attractive, intelligent and funny. No complaints.
ElainaWhitacker 1 day ago
To paraphrase Bill Hicks, have you ever noticed that creationists generally look unevolved? Cro-magnon brow line, hunched posture, spouting things like "I believe god created me in 1 week."
Yeah, looks like he rushed it...
brocmt 2 days ago 2
Gods fake.....accept it sorry to break it to you
GOMLrandom 2 days ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
if you want to hear about Jesus and learn HOW TO BE SAVED call 1-800-78grace or 1-877-567-8989!!
hpnc 2 days ago
@hpnc I tried it. How come Jesus calles me "honey" and wants to know what Im wearing?
CognosSquare 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolutionary Biologists predicted that for a human to evolve from a great Ape, one pair of Chromosomes simply had to fuse, for us to posess one less pair. They accepted if that was not found, the theory was dead. Would you believe it? When the technology arrived to check that, there it is the fused base pair giving us 23 instead of 24. How amazing that god planted that to trick us and make it looked like we evolved from apes. Why waste so much time trying to get people to accept him....
KowBoySpace 2 days ago
@RitzDaCracker1 Humans did not evolve from Monkeys, but an Ape-like ancestor. Theres a big difference; Monkeys are small and not so intelligent, Apes are much larger and more intelligent. Monkeys and apes still exist because there is still an evolutionary need for them in nature.
StuffandThings85 3 days ago
the only thing i dont get about evolutions is, if monkeys evovlved, why are there still monkeys? if some of the species gets left behind and dont evolve, then why arent there caveman dudes walking around still? WHy did only the Monkey stage not fully evolve? Can anyone answer that?
RitzDaCracker1 4 days ago
@RitzDaCracker1 look up the richard dawkins video about that. It's a very simple answer actually, youtube comments are just not good enough for it. Again, there is a very specific Dawkins video on just that.
TrojanGold1314 4 days ago
@RitzDaCracker1 Why not study it instead of asking in youtube comments. Short answer: you're looking at it in a way that's too linear. We share a common ancestor with the great apes. Speciation is when species essentially split off from one species into another. as far as the "caveman dudes" they're not around b/c they weren't adapted well enough to survive. homo sapiens were the best adapted, so we dominated the others and/or the others died out.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
@RitzDaCracker1 BECAUSE WE ARE NOT MONKEYS! We have a common ancestor, but we ARE NOT MONKEYS. It's like asking why lizards haven't evolved into dinosaurs right about now. Evolution takes years and years of adaptation and DNA alterations/mutations to create new groups of organisms. How about you go get some "edjamacation" from one of those fancy learnin' schools and become informed on these topics?
CrazyLazySnazzyJazzy 2 days ago
@RitzDaCracker1 1. Monkeys around today are the evolved form of a similar ancestor. 2. Humans are not evolved from monkeys, but rather from that similar ancestor. 3. Evolution doesn't quite work that way. There are many mechanisms in evolution including natural selection, genetic mutation, etc. 99% of all species that have existed are extinct. Extinction happens constantly in geological time. cavemen are believed to be human species, just early in our evolutionary history. We are still evolving
triphip2 2 days ago
Well my granddaddy ain't a monkey.
TheEnviroFriend 5 days ago
crazy77iii is a monkey. I don't know how the IQ scale for monkeys works, but I know that this person is retarded even compared just to other monkeys.
booksRbad 5 days ago
actually, as members of infraorder catarrhini, we are monkeys
winston2015 6 days ago
Well i ain't a monkey!
SDSup3rCharg3rs 6 days ago
hey everybody! shutup.
Nindojo 6 days ago
I like you and have no reason not to. I like you and have no reason not to :) Hey did you hear about that magical baby born in Bethlehem? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH dead.
charliepossenriede 1 week ago
i dont understand why there is such a contraversy.....evolution is a fact and yes it does contradict the bible so ppl have the need to deny it. but we also know that the earth is round, something that also contradicts the bible.....in fact most 21st century science contradicts the bible.The scientific community is in concensus that its fact, and ill take 21st century scientists opinions on science over bronze age literature anyday and its silly not to.
arcejason 1 week ago
This was like a conversation with my Dad after explaining evolution to him multiple times when he says I ain't no monkey it just makes him look like more of one b/c any person with a brain and a 6th grade level education should be able to grasp the concept of evolution.
mavinajfan 1 week ago
@mavinajfan I can grasp it, but reject it as implausible.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 At least you can comprehend the theory and can therefore make your mind up about whether you think it's right or wrong. My Dad has a little wall built up in his head and just cannot understand the theory. I'd be fine with him continuing, like I know he will, thinking it's a theory but I wish he'd open up to an explanation.
mavinajfan 1 week ago
@mavinajfan " At least you can comprehend the theory" No he can't. anything he knows about it he got from websites trying to "debunk" evolution. he hasn't studied it at all, it's obvious.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
@WilliamTyndale1 Yeah... because biology is implausible. If you find it implausible, you don't understand it. Go read that bible again and tell me which makes more sense.
asp1124 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 einstein found quantum theory implausible. later in his life he had to admit it was valid. this shows that even experts in the field can be wrong about theories. the difference between you and einstein, besides the genius part, is 1. he was actually a scientist and an expert in his field. 2. he was intellectually honest.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
I love Louis CK, its unfortunate we will not meet on the other side.
XGod0 1 week ago
@XGod0 You are right about that. There is no other side. What kind of God would it be if he only sent people to Heaven for believing in him? What a stupid notion. It has the fingerprints of humanity all over it. "Believe it or you won't go to this awesome place with gardens and rainbows after you die! Oh, but we have absolutely no evidence for this. In fact all the evidence is against it." That is the way most mentally capable people see it.
karim3343 1 week ago
@karim3343 Well based on my interpretation of Christian beliefs not only must you believe in God, the Son, and the Holy spirit, but you must merit the moral values and obey the teachings. Simply believing in God and sining nonstop with no sense of remorse or intention to do better will still result in a rather unpleasant afterlife.
XGod0 1 week ago
@XGod0 And yet, you could be the best person in the history of the planet... Giving your life to save children, and other people. STILL, not enough, and at the end of the day, you will be burned in Hell for having a different opinion about the universe. What a ridiculous and abhorrent way to view other people. I'm just happy that most Christians today forgot about all the despicable verses in their Bible, unlike Muslims. If Christians today really did follow, then they would be as bad as Muslims
karim3343 1 week ago 32
@karim3343 Well the first testament is where a lot of controversy arises, and in actuality that book has more weight in the eyes of Jews versus Christians. Certain areas of the scripture is meant to be interpreted literally while others symbolic and metaphoric. In addition, those in power (Illuminati for example) have altered the contents over centuries to misinform/construe the true teachings to create more conflict and divide the population. I believe in Jesus's teachings and the power of love
XGod0 1 week ago
Comment removed
skershaw2000 1 week ago
@skershaw2000 Yes because Nazis were persecuting Muslims. And no, I don't group all Muslims as bad. My ENTIRE family is Muslim, so screw off with your preconceived notions. I'm ignorant because I find the Babble to be a set of moral ideals only fit for barbaric cavemen? Just give me the word and I'll pull a dozen Babble verses from memory. But you don't want that do you?
karim3343 1 week ago
Comment removed
skershaw2000 1 week ago
@skershaw2000 That is obviously not true. There is always a dis-proportionality in crime, violence, war, poverty, education, literacy, etc. when it comes to culture/religion. Don't be politically correct with me and say everyone has the exact same beliefs. That is bullshit! Today for example, Muslims ARE responsible for most of the wars on the planet; that is a fact! 8 out of the 10 current "low intensity conflicts" are perpetrated by Muslim nations. And my entire family is Muslim, so enough.
karim3343 1 week ago
Comment removed
skershaw2000 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@skershaw2000 I don't think it is possible to know the genuine beliefs of the leaders of Al Queda. I do know that their existence depends on belief in god. They rely on Mosques and religious persuasion for recruitment and strong faith in Allah in recruiting suicide bombers.
I am sure that without religion, people still would have fought wars. However, only faith can convince good people that they are doing the right thing. Without it, only evil people would commit evil acts.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago in playlist Videos
This has been flagged as spam show
@skershaw2000 You can see examples of belief being used as the front man for wars although they may have an alternate objective. Look at the crusades as easily the most recognizable holy war. Regardless of the power gained of the resources gained or land conquered, the war was operated under the flag of religion, And many of the wars supporters supported the war primarily because of the religious connotations. Your turn.
TheDebtisslavery 1 week ago
@skershaw2000 YES, top leadership of Al-Qaeda DO believe in God. Don't you dare tell me they do not. Two of my good friends are Musa and Haroun Bin Laden. Their uncle was the infamous Osama Bin Laden. I know people in the Muslim Brotherhood; in fact the son of the former leader (Ali Al-Swedey) is a good friend of mine. I know the radicalists and terrorists viewpoints on MOST things, so don't try to outwit me on that.
karim3343 6 days ago
Comment removed
skershaw2000 6 days ago
@skershaw2000 Really? Then Google them. They are not famous at all. I went to CAC (Cairo American College) with them from Kindergarten to my senior year. I don't care if you act like that's impossible, just ask them yourself. Here is his twitter feed @HaroonBinladin. Just Google it and click on his Twitter feed. Ask him if he went to school with Karim Al-Sharif (my name) or just look at his friends and you'll see my brother (Joe Al-Sharif). I've done more than enough to prove it to you.
karim3343 6 days ago
@karim3343 "because Nazis were persecuting Muslims"
No, they weren't. The Grand Mufti visited Nazi Germany to discuss the elimination of the Jews. They were very matey.
Pleendriver 1 week ago
@Pleendriver ?? Umm, that was my point. It was a little bit of sarcasm because of what skershaw2000 said. He called me a Nazi for stereotyping Muslims (which I did not attempt to do in the first place).
karim3343 6 days ago
"It didn't happen in 1972." LOL
Turtleposer 1 week ago
Would be really funny if louis ck died screaming - and asked God for help - and the response he got is "Talk to the hand"!!! HAHAHAHA
gomergilligan 1 week ago
@gomergilligan go suck a black cock
lukaskaetano 1 week ago
@lukaskaetano - Nah - I'd rather live vicariously through you. Do you swallow? I bet to you "Life ith FABOULITH" - hahahhaha - fag. Tell me honestly - when you're all ALONE, in your room, sitting in the DARK - do you have peace? Joy? Feel loved? OR do you feel sad, lonely, anxiety, fear & depression? Let me guess - HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!
gomergilligan 1 week ago
I was born in 1972!
splooged 1 week ago
its funny cause im a monkey.
jameswoodsist 1 week ago
Somebody mentioned religion. EVERYBODY FIGHT!!!!!!!
StephenAndrew777 1 week ago 32
I do believe in creation but he's still right, MOST people that argue sound completely rediculous because they haven't looked into it, they just pick a side.
"mom said god exists someone else said he didn't... mom also said santa claus exists..."
Protaneum 1 week ago
@Protaneum Yeah. I believe that if something did create us, our little religions piss it off.
StephenAndrew777 1 week ago
WELL MY DADDY AINT A MONKEY!
...did you read the thing? It doesn't sound like you read it.
mekkabon 1 week ago
@Rockster969 Please stop with your insults. You're making the entire scientific community look bad.
moldybakedbeans 1 week ago
Ohh, I love Louis CK. (seriously, I saw him live and almost suffocated by laughter) I believe God created everything, but man he is spot on. There are a lot of people who do say really dumb sounding things like that. A lot of people believe stuff that they don't know how to defend, (on all sides), and in this world where science rules, its easy to sound dumb defending creationism.
TheBBear86 1 week ago
@TheBBear86 I agree 100%.
crazy77iii 1 week ago
@crazy77iii were you home-schooled?
ldoooooggggg 1 week ago
@ldoooooggggg Listen.. I"m not the one that is limiting my open-mindedness to "only" the physical realm... I wasn't home schooled butnhow deosn't that have any difference. I alsmot wish that I would've have been sometimes.
crazy77iii 1 week ago
@TheBBear86 science does not rule the world look at the american gov. everyone on youtube loves ron paul but he doesnt even believe in evolution a presidential nomiinee
]
ronjonsurf39 1 week ago
... Anybody else tired of youtube arguments in comments of funny vids...
Khrystoffar 1 week ago 32
@Khrystoffar i am
Pontusky 1 week ago 9
@Pontusky what special is this from?............or somewhere else?
dhawansoumya 1 week ago
@dhawansoumya its an outtake from "Live at the Beacon"
Pontusky 1 week ago 4
@Khrystoffar I think they're hilarious.
jonasgrant 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar Anybody else tired of youtube arguments all together instead of mature adult conversations and discussions?
crazy77iii 1 week ago
@crazy77iii lol ikr, some ppl are missing the point of twitter and online blogs. smh
Khrystoffar 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar Yeah, I think so. heck , this is better as you get something to watch at the same time! lol
crazy77iii 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar This kind of "comedy" is inherently divisive. You would find far more derisive comments from those who would be offended by a clip that contained a caricature of evolutionary theology that goes, "I think most ppl who argue against creationism sound really stupid. Because most ppl who actually argue against it say things like 'In the beginning there was Nothing...and then it exploded.'"
I have yet to find an evo who was anything but outraged by that short summary of their position.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 Evolution =/= Big Bang. Good try though.
That line is a silly as, "In the beginning there was nothing...then a giant sky wizard farted."
LogicalF4ll4cY 1 week ago
@LogicalF4ll4cY There you go..thank you for proving my point :) You couldn't help but be irked by what you took as a gross mischaracterization of your beliefs so you commented.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1
Didn't prove anything actually. Don't mistake curiosity of why one would get mad at that statement for someone actually getting mad. I was stating that one would have to have either no sense of humor about what they believe or a very short fuze. The example was merely a mockery of how silly it sounds and what I expect its opposite would be for the opposing view. I don't know why someone would get upset over it except for reasons previously mentioned.
LogicalF4ll4cY 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 I get what you're saying. But my main deal is that there are vids that have that type of forum. Because most of the people that comment on these vids are all talking opinion and have no intent on changing their way of thinking. So to me it makes ZERO sense to have a religious argument if no one is going to be changed and especially since most ppl came here because the guy's a comedian. Not saying that ppl shouldn't respond if u feel strong enough, but choose your battles.
Khrystoffar 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar To that, if it is applied both ways (as I think you intend it), I heartily agree. Take for instance Christian worship songs on youtube. Probably NOT the forum for debate, yet many of them, esp. those with quite a few views, are absolutely cluttered with atheist comments denigrating Christians and God. If only the "tolerant" could be more tolerant,lol
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 lol, exactly what i'm saying and some people are forgetting that no one is forcing them to comment. Then those same people get mad when someone responds. smh, lol
Khrystoffar 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar :)
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 I'd imagine that many of those commenters live in countries where Christians enforce their religion on people through laws and other means. No, it isn't an appropriate venue, but sometimes intolerance is reactionary.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago in playlist Videos
@AstoriaRego I am very curious to hear any stories of you or others having had Christianity enforced on you through laws and other means. Quite intriguing. I had heard of Islamic states doing this, but wasn't aware that it was happening in traditionally Christian countries.
I was always under the impression that it was only in traditionally Christian countries (as opposed to Atheist regimes or Islamic states) where rights to freedom of speech and religion were honored?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 1. DOMA. 2. Prohibitions on gay marriage. 3. DADT. 4. Blue laws. 5. Until recently, lack of access to OTC emergency birth control. 6. Historical prohibitions on abortion. 7. Laws requiring Sunday closure of businesses, and case law denying exemption to Jews. 8. Tax exemption for religions. 9. denial of alcohol permits based on proximity to churches. 10. Efforts to curb pagans in the military from equal access to religious practice.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago in playlist Videos
@AstoriaRego You 4got laws against pedophilia,bestiality&necrophilia.Ought2throw that on this list2round it out.Sounds like hedonism has really just been shut right down, lol
Of course,1 of the most heinously offensive acts is when they put their nativity scenes out, that just SCREAMS intolerance.
I've got an idea.Why don't atheists&sodomites&baby butchers band together,raise up the cash&buy one of the third world tropical islands over its head in debt and found their own"free&tolerant"society?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 We have laws against non-consensual sexual relationships because they cause harm. My list was of behaviors that do not cause harm, but are legislated because people want to impose their religious values on society as a whole.
I think I'll just stay here in the U.S. and help it become the country it could be - the one that was founded based on freedom of religion and whose constitution guarantees freedom from invidious discrimination.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago in playlist Videos
@AstoriaRego Well if that's your attitude...by all means stay :)
You do realize that those that founded this country (16th-19th century) were the ones who put in place the laws you listed as being intolerant? Maybe not the exact wording that existed in more modern times, but if anything, far more stringent against perversion. You might do well to study what makes a strong country and what caused the collapse of ancient Rome. We are on a nearly parallel course. One more generation, two at most.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego pt1
Let me ask you this: Do you accept/believe evolutionary theory? Do you reject the Judeo-Christian God?
If you do not accept the living God, why would you want to have anything to do with the institution He ordained? Marriage makes absolutely NO sense in a strictly secular, hedonistic, evolutionary, survival-of-the-fittest paradigm where the "strongest and fittest" take as many mates as possible in order to reproduce and strengthen and advance the stock...
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 Marriage predated monotheism. Granted, it was originally a pagan institution, but it has a strong secular purpose. It makes a lot of sense in a secular society, since it grants a host of important legal rights.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego "Marriage predated monotheism."
Pagans ripped off the original. There was never a time in the history of mankind when at least some of the race did not worship the one, true God. I don't expect you to accept that, however. But I would like to see what REAL concrete proof you have to back up that claim. Even in your paradigm, there is a huge gap between the motivations of ancient pagans and those of modern man (of the past couple generations) that you have glossed over.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AstoriaRego "...since it grants a host of important legal rights."
It has only been during the past few generations that mankind has started to think of marriage in terms of "rights," and it has only been approx. 100 years in this country since marriage was an institution of the state (the first mistake). Certainly there has to be better reasons for getting married than to take advantage of tax breaks? What would homosex couples want in way of rights? Children?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 Evolution is a scientific fact, not a behavioral dictate. There are plenty of things that would make me more fit for survival that I do not partake in. Just because my ancestors increased genetic strength by having many mates doesn't mean I have to make the same choices.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego "Evolution is a scientific fact, not a behavioral dictate."
So at what point during our long, slow crawl out of the primordial ooze was the hierarchichal structure evident in most mammal family prides, packs and herds (wherein only the most dominant are given breeding rights) abandoned in favor of a marriage system, and how exactly was this permitted by and alright with the dominant males? And can your beliefs be substantiated by real, scientific fact?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego pt2
(which means that homosex is ALSO detrimental 2 the evo paradigm) instead of one man joining to one woman,regardless of their strenght or "fitness."
Certainly the tolerant would want2abstain from the "injustice" of yoking two people together for life??
I have heard, "If you don't like gay marriage, don't get one" espoused as the "tolerant" viewpoint.
How about,"If u despise God&don't want anything2do w/Him,then don't have anything to do w/His institution between a MAN&a WOMAN"?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego pt3
Perhaps you justify your "tolerant" position on abortion by saying, "If you don't like abortion, then don't have one*." and "If you don't like sex, then don't have it."
(Implying that those who point to God's law that sex outside of your marriage partner is sin don't "like" sex.),
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego pt4
*Never mind that our govt uses the tax dollars of BOTH pro-life&pro-death people2finance the abortion industry.How tolerant is THAT??
How about,"If u hate life&taking responsibility4ur actions,&u hate the Originator of life so much that u want the legal right2rip the arms off&suck the brains out of the skulls of infants it in the womb,then don't have sex"(e.g.Don't engage in God's institution of sexual union whereby life is conceived thereby cutting the opportunity4life to nil)?
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 I'm sorry, I don't understand your last post. Is there any way you could write it in plain English?
As to abortion, the analogy is not apt. The criticism against abortion is that it takes the life of a third party, and thereby causes harm. There is no tangible harm alleged by gay marriage; no third party is hurt and you are unaffected by it.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego pt4
If you hate life, if you hate taking responsibility for your actions, if you hate the Originator of life so much that u want the legal "right" to rip the arms off & suck the brains out of the skulls of infants in the womb, then don't have sex"
(e.g.Don't engage in God's institution of sexual union whereby life is conceived, thereby cutting the opportunity to bring forth life to nil)
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego If they were given the "right" to children, I would certainly argue that many children (as third parties) would be hurt by showing them that perversion was "natural." If you are conditioned to think of gay "rights" as civil rights, remember, there are thousands of former gays who have come to Christ, and NOT ONE "former black" or "former Hispanic" or "former Asian,"etc. & if u insist that some people are just "born gay," you are implying that we do not CHOOSE who we have sex with.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego Ought we to recognize the "right" of a pedophile to have sex with a five-year-old, simply because he is "attracted" to him? Would the rationale that they were "just born that way" fly then?
NOTE: This is NOT a call to "legislate the bedroom." What gays and sexual deviant individuals of all kinds do to one another as "consenting adults" behind closed doors is between them and the God they will one day answer to.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego But they are demanding that they be given the "right" to participate in the institution of matrimony that was given to mankind by the very God they refuse to obey. This seems to me to be utmost intolerance and hypocrisy, though, certainly our culture has a million excuses to justify it, as they do the rest of their behavior.
Also, this is not to be misconstrued as part of the non-biblical "God hates fags" ideology that some have adapted to justify their hatred.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 The institution of marriage predates written history. Since Judaism began after written history began, we can know that marriage was not created by Judeo-Christians even if we do not understand its origin.
Regardless, marriage has important secular purposes, and has been established as a civil right in the U.S. It is therefore unethical to deny it to a particular group of people without good reason. The fact that it violates your religion is not enough.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego God loves ALL mankind, and while we have not all engaged in sodomy, we HAVE all sinned against God and come short of His perfection. We ALL need to accept Christ as our savior. God condemns ALL sin and there is only one way to escape the righteous judgment of the infinitely just Creator: Through the precious blood of Jesus Christ who gave Himself for our sins.
God loves gays, even the most militant, just as He loves all mankind.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego But God HAS given us guidelines to live within in order that we might have peace and fulfillment in this life. When a man and a woman are joined IN Him, they no longer seek to just have their "needs met," but to give of themselves and treat each other as they would want to be treated, loving each other with the love of God. And to pervert this sacred union by making it a "covenant" between two people of the same sex is about as much of an insult as you could give its Originator.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@AstoriaRego It is in a category even above those who piss on gravestones and burn flags because those symbols are man-made and marriage is God-made.
Now, if God is not a reality in your life, you are not likely to agree. But you were born in a country founded by people who DID believe these things. You will not find the freedom to dissent in an Islamic state or an Atheist regime. Only in historically Christian cultures have basic rights and freedoms been granted. But these are never enough.
WilliamTyndale1 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 Some of those who founded my country were Christians, some were deists and emphatically non-Christian. Regardless of the religious beliefs of these authors, we have kept the rights and structure they created because of the inherent goodness of the government it results from.
I believe in continuing to establish the best and fairest system possible knowing what we do now. Their religion isn't relevant to that.
AstoriaRego 1 week ago
@WilliamTyndale1 "I have yet to find an evo who was anything but outraged by that short summary of their position" outraged? no. a singularity isn't "nothing" and you're talking about cosmology, not evolutionary theory. so probably you get ragged on because you sound like a retarded child talking to adults.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
@BillKiernan OK Bill, if the singularity WAS Something, what was it? How did it get there? What force put the tremendous amount of energy into it that the Big Bang Theory requires? And if you say 'IDK,' is your faith still science?
WilliamTyndale1 3 days ago
@WilliamTyndale1 read...a....book.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
@BillKiernan ...besides the Bible, for a change.
BillKiernan 3 days ago
@Khrystoffar You can always just not read the argumentative comments. It's ludicrous to complain of other people's behavior when you are exposing yourself to it.
AtheistScholar 1 week ago
@AtheistScholar Oh, ludicrous is it. U hear that guys its ludicrous. Apparently 31 other people agree with this 'ludicrous' statement. Ludicrous!
Khrystoffar 1 week ago
@Khrystoffar I actually find it ironic that this comment has started a youtube argument, LOL!!!
Khrystoffar 1 week ago
and I apologize for my horrific grammar
DoneWithDogma 2 weeks ago
All you supporters of evolution out there need to realize that it produced creationists, so maybe its not so goddamn hot after all.
MisterSkillet100 2 weeks ago
@MisterSkillet100 Believing evolution is true is not the same as claiming that evolution is good (or bad, for that matter). It is what it is.
XOmniverse 1 week ago
@XOmniverse Please get a highly evolved strain of a horrible flesh eating disease in your scrotum you autistic fucking humorless idiot.
MisterSkillet100 1 week ago
@MisterSkillet100 Oh yeah! Talk dirty to me!
XOmniverse 1 week ago
Darwinian evolution is a monstrous hoax. We have all been duped.
GewgleTubeExplorer 2 weeks ago
All you argumentative and stubborn people ruin Louis's stand-up. It's comedy, therefore you take it with a grain of salt no matter what you believe in. If you don't like it, don't watch it and shut up
qtpy112393 2 weeks ago 3
Holy shit he looks so much older. Grey hair??
nathonas 2 weeks ago
@nathonas no, just shitty video
faaaaaaaaaaack 2 weeks ago
I'll believe in evolution when I see an apple turn into an elephant.
mchandler2112 2 weeks ago
@mchandler2112 LOL- That's just nonsense now isn't it. I will admit that LCK does hit it on the head. But I do think that this is changing with many wanting to know more about defending their faith.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mchandler2112 "I'll believe in evolution when I see an apple turn into an elephant."
You better be a troll. I refuse to believe that any human could actually be that stupid. Please tell me you're a troll.
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@mchandler2112 ignorant fundie cunt
Rockster969 2 weeks ago
I am one of the 5 great apes, and the greatest of all of them, and I'm damn proud of it!
Keldrath 2 weeks ago
Want some scientific Tests with real Results? Google
21 Days into the Afterlife! GOD BLESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :o)
P.S. have fun with my comments since you aren't intelligent enough to have your own conversations....
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
Hey guys... I have an idea!? Why don't we all join in on the badwagan and act like school kids, calling names for someone that doesn't believe in the foolishnish that we do. Then we can all have fun acting like the apes that we think that we are..." You guys are idiots..... LOL- Childish ones at that. I Swear, you guys come out of the woodwork on youtube like flies on shit when a anti-evotard speaks up. I bet most of you haven't even read past 2 pages of comments becasue you're to lazy...
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii Yeah, people who believe in evolution are retards, aren't they. That's right, most scientists are retards, isn't that right? 99% of geneticists and biologists are idiots when it comes to science. Seriously, do you hear what you're saying? You're calling the entire science community idiots. Here's an idea; why don't you go and pay a visit to the guys at The National Academy of Sciences and explain to them how "retarded" they are. Why don't you go and school all those dumb scientists!
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters Sorry, I meant It's [meaning the action of] Retarded TO Believe in it.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters Let me ak you something... Do you think that it's possible for a group of people to go insane? A whole country? How about the entire World? If not, then picture hitlers "group".
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
I thought maybe Louis C.K. would explain how evolution works in this clip. Alas, he does no such thing. "Did you read the thing?" Thought-provoking stuff.
GewgleTubeExplorer 2 weeks ago
@GewgleTubeExplorer Why would he do that? Richard Dawkins does a great job of that. I like the segment. He's highlighting the absurdity of those who deny evolution based on straw man arguments and strident incredulity. It's good for people - not all of whom think like you - to have it made simple and obvious how ridiculous the debate over evolution is, namely that there is no debate.
scientrophic 2 weeks ago
it's because they know we're force evolved from pigs not monkeys.
sdzeit 2 weeks ago
Did you read the thing? It doesn't sound like you read it.
BesttBi 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii "YOu can laugh all that you want at the words that I type but no matter how hard you laugh at them they will Still Reign True Forever and Ever"
You believe in talking donkeys, zombies and flying people. These things never happened, you're deluded. You're a religious maniac, you hate science and you believe in ridiculous fairy-tales that are based on no evidence. You think religious websites are more reliable than actual science and you're immune to logic. Fuck off.
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii "Divine Proof written 100's to 1000's of years before science was even in the minds of Humans, In Ancient Scriptures that have Passed the Test of time"
The fact that the Bible was created during a primitive time is even more reason not to take it seriously. It was written by people who didn't know anything, why would I pay it any credence? The Bible is just made-up nonsense.
Hinduism is even older than Christianity, does that mean Hinduism is true?
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters "The fact that the Bible was created during a primitive time " You are not even understanding what you just Implied and Proved... The Bible, which you think was written by supposedly primitive man, predicted Looooong before genetics were even invented that they would be invented and not to "Give Heed" to them as it would only "Miniter questions" instead "Godly Edifying". Tell me how this is possible?
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii There are two ways to live life. You can live according to reason - the same faculty that has brought you computers, the internet, medicine, everything you value in life, the theory of evolution. The other way is to live without reason, according to what others simply tell you is reality - the same strategy that results in things like mass starvation, brutality, and genocide. Evolution is fact, and mere incredulity - the strategy of evolution deniers - is not enough to disprove it.
scientrophic 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic Please don't forget it was the Union of the Militant Godless that perfected "mass starvation, brutality and genocide" in the Ukrainian Holodomor 80 years ago. And likewise today the secular-zionist NATO countries are among the most brutal in implementing aerial firebombing and starvation-sanctions which affect mostly civilian populations. When Orthodox Christians and Muslim theists protest to these un-Christ-like injustices are we not using our reasoning faculties?
GewgleTubeExplorer 2 weeks ago
@GewgleTubeExplorer Of course you would be! But that's a different subject altogether. I find it interesting how fast you changed from saying that he doesn't explain evolution to claiming that atheists are "brutal" and "unjust" the moment someone said that he doesn't need to explain. If you want to know what evolution is, you can. There are many excellent resources out there, from the Internet to your library. I would have expected you to know this already, but maybe I overestimated you.
TheClampFan 2 weeks ago
@GewgleTubeExplorer State religions that worship an ideology or a leader are just that - religions that require one to suspend reason and just do what you're told. Be careful: just because it correlates with a state-organized rejection of mainstream religions so that the state can dominate the will of the people does not pin reason with the responsibility. Reasoning based on false facts - e.g. the gypsies are killing the economy - may as well be faith. Secular-zionism? You need to unpack that.
scientrophic 2 weeks ago
@GewgleTubeExplorer Oh wow, you're blaming the atrocities committed by Israel on atheists? Let's see, Israeli settlers (who are religious zealots) are responsible for stealing land that was previously owned by Palestinians and the entire premise for Zionism is from the Bible (Genesis 15:18-21). The main funder of Israel is America (a mostly Christian country that has never had an atheist leader). How is any of this the fault of atheists?
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic See this is were Many are wrong. Evoluiton is not in the same catagory as the others. Just because Variation can be observal doesn't make Evolution Anything More Than Just That.....
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii Just answer one question: have you actually studied all of the research behind evolution? Have you studied it at a college level? Don't say anything else. Just answer the question: to what extent have you actually looked into this scientific subject?
scientrophic 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic Deeply. As much as some may beg to differ. :o) I'm sure that there is only a fraction of a percent of people, especially on YT that can say that they have studied ALL areas of science.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii bullshit, ya aint studied fuck all if you are coming out with such cock snot
Rockster969 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic Have you Studied All Areas of Science, with a degree in every area? reason being is that you first quoted the same phrase that I've seen many, Many, MANY times by YTers... It's common.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii Yes, I have a degree in neuroscience and I am currently undertaking graduate studies. Have you read Origin of Species? Any of the academic literature? Are you familiar with digital evolution? No theory is material, and therefore does not "exist" in one sense. You're just playing semantics here. Entropy doesn't "exist", but it does. Evo describes a process that matter undergoes. Macro-evo is not a term. Define it.
scientrophic 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic That's Very commendable! I bet you are one smart cookie. ;o)
I have read Origin of Species and it's garbage. Liek I've told others, it's a "fun" idea that allows one to feel free of feeling accountable from the afterlife but brother... I"m telling you... HOW is it possible for "just a book" written thousands of years ago, to predict so everything that it has So Finely detailed and accurately? I don't think it is possible without Divinity. It even calls out evolution in 1 Timothy..
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii We don't believe in evolution because it makes us "feel free of feeling accountable from the afterlife", we believe in evolution because it's a proven scientific explanation for the origin of organisms. Religion is an emotional security blanket; people believe in religion because the thought of an afterlife makes them feel all warm and fuzzy. The idea that when you die, you float off to paradise is a comforting belief that helps people sleep at night. But it's just bullshit.
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters See you and all of the rest of group are failing to regocnize is that you belive in an explaination that is "Suppsedly proven" by Many, Many Many, Assumptions. but that still is good enough for you. I don't think that scientists are idiots by the way. Although, I do think that a world can become so self indulged an arrogant that the fail to recognize the actual truth of "What" we actually are. You all say that we are "deluded" but you guys are too. There's no way around it.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters You believing in evolution must amke you warm and fussy inside as well. Otherwise why would you even need to "know". There is something inside all of us, no matter who you are, that has a deep inevitable desure to "know" why and how we are here and for what purpose. Don't you find it very odd that we are the only Creature that is Asking these questions about ourselves? Why did mutate, in the same envrionment, WAY past every other life form on this earth, IF evo is true?
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii Oh dear!
We haven't 'mutated way past' as all we have over the primates is a better developed central nervous system but we can't fly, aren't the strongest, have no sting or camouflage.
We've become self aware, that is all, and can form abstract thoughts so we can plan things, thats it.
There is SO much evidence for evolution that is you don't believe it ya aint studied it and all because some arsehole priest said you'd party into eternity with your skydaddy.
Rockster969 2 weeks ago
@Rockster969 "We've become self aware, that is all, and can form abstract thoughts so we can plan things, thats it. " "That's IT" huh? WOW, you really need to get outside and look around. Tell me please, if that's it and we are a race that has merely evolved from an ancester of apes, then why is it that the First Languages are Only within the Past 6k years? And don't throw this crap out about Dated proof past that either.. Cause that is all nonsense. Explain Subjective Experience!? (ie. Souls)
crazy77iii 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crazy77iii "Why did mutate, in the same envrionment, WAY past every other life form on this earth, IF evo is true?"
We just happened to have evolved more advanced brains. Humans' forte is intelligence in the same way that a cheeter's forte is agility and speed. Humans just have very evolved brains. What's so confusing about that?
If you're saying that people who believe in evolution are deluded, then you're calling the whole science community deluded. You're just so wrong.
cornflakeclusters 1 week ago
@cornflakeclusters Evolution is yeilded from chance. No? It's all relevent if you look at all areas of science at once, as one big explaination. If one concedes that "maybe" God did create us, but then follows up with evo explains how God created us... That is Theistic evolution and that deosn't follow what the Bible says in Genesis. Some say, "Abiogenesis has nothing to do with how evolution works". but indeed it is relevant as IF Abiogenesis is Explained by God, then we are as he Created us.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii You sir, are a mental cripple.
Rockster969 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic ***Typo*** (remove "so")
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic P.S. I don't understand how YOU of all people in science can sit and Think about how Each of our multi-trillion cells has a Neuron Fiber attached to it and then say. "Defintely must have been by chance...". I'm assuming this as you being versed in that field, would have to be pretty intelligent, therefore wouldn't also Claim Theistic-evolution. Cause that its completely condradictory to what God portrays to us in Genesis.
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii You do realize that Louis CK is a comedian, right? We (his fans) don't care about you. Go peddle your nonsense elsewhere.
vidfest 2 weeks ago
@vidfest Here let me stoop to your level... " I was here first" and "they started it!" LOL Take a hike... or contribute to the conversation in a mature and intelligent manner...
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@scientrophic "computers, the internet, medicine, etc.." Those are things that we can observe and are Made by man and Real things. Unlike Macro-evo. Which is nonexistent...
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii The Bible mentions genetics? Tell me more, I've never heard about this before. I'm assuming that you're going to tell me about an extremely vague passage from the Bible and proceed to interpret it to mean whatever you want it to mean.
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago
@cornflakeclusters Yes it does. There is NO Interpreation needed. It's Very Clear what it says.... (JKV) 1 Timothy 1:4 "neither give heed to Endless Fables and "Genealogies...".
crazy77iii 2 weeks ago
@crazy77iii This is amazing, you are just flat-out denying the fact that most scientists believe in evolution. You can believe in creationism all you want, fine, but don't deny that nearly all scientists believe in evolution.
Taking into account only those working in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences, there are about 480,000 scientists, but only about 700 believe in "creation-science". Why aren't you getting this?
cornflakeclusters 2 weeks ago