I'm no expert, but if that is a human hand it is really deformed. Start around 1:08 and keep your finger on the play/pause button. Around 1:10 you'll get a good shot of the hand. Notice how thin the entire hand is and then the thin elongated fingers. NOT HUMAN!
@revskull It's kind of funny how there are those who would rather think an alien was running around in the forest climbing 14 feet up a tree to mess with my cameras or play in the mud. Keep in mind the mud print cooberates the photos and that they were taken about about 6 miles and several weeks appart. Notice how the mud print below the palm and on the arm was made from hair. 11 inches from plam to tip of the longest finger
azvideoguy (3 weeks ago) Fingers seem elongated, but it is a optical illusion caused by fast movement. Probably a poacher trying to mess with the camera or steal it.
dude...pause it at 0:14 and tell me do poachers have those kinds of fingers!!...this is whats irritating..susanfarns is tryin their best and show all they have and people still claim its somethin else..a poacher would steal the damn cameras..if they can steal game and poach they will take a darn camera...its a no brainer
I did fingerprint the camera. I got one good print on the infared motion sensor. The rest were smears. I did a video called "Bigfoot fingerprints" in which I show the prints.
For those interested, I did pick up a fingerprint kit and I will be dusting the camera ASAP. It is good I didn't go hang it back up in the trees again.
NewsPaper? Maybe you mean the Phoenix Magazine, October 2009 issue. Or the Channel 3 (Phoenix) video? There are links to those at my web site.
You just never know. It would be worth printing though if for nothing but further reference.
Could have been an optical illusion of poacher/prankster or a big guy. The image is just too unclear. One thing is certain, they know cameras and they don't like them. Camera shy doesn't begin to express it. It seems like they know that a pic capture would be bad for them. Weird.
Whatever was playing with the camera sure has long fingers. If it was a human then I'm thinking the camera might have disappeared. Humans being honest as they are. Strange capture though.
The hand movement is in the wrong direction to cause the optical illusion due to fast movement. In both cases the hand is moving upward, not across with the length of the fingers. And then there is the mud prints. Not an obtical illusion there. One of my cameras gave up some hair. Microscopic examination shows no medula and matches BF hair found in MD, CA and Or,
There was a photo taken and posted in the twin cities newspaper of a bigfoot. It too was taken by a game camera. They state the creature is right at 7 feet tall. Measuring the hand and the height, a ratio is developed and the hand length can be calculated. They are approximately 11 inches long with the fingers being longer than the palm of the hand (not Human proportions). And get this--no fur or hair on the hands.
No. I had not even thought about that. I wouldn't even begin to know where to get the dust or brushes. Or what to do once I got the prints. I still have the cameras, I suppose I could give it a try and then post photos on the internet for someone to run or ID as non human.
Does anyone know where I can purchase a fingerprint kit? And, what should I be looking for in fingerprints? Or should I be looking for anything that doesn't look right. I know footprint dermal ridges run differently than humans. Does anyone know that Bigfoot's fingerprints should look like?
Ok, I went and purchased a fingerprint kit and dusted my entire camera. Most of it was smudges and non usuable. However, on the movement sensor there was a print. I managed to pull it off. I don't know much about fingerprints, but I do know human prints curl or swirl. These dermal ridges are straight. No curl to them. They could be human, but then again, maybe not. I will post them for people to look at to get their opinion since I know no fingerprint experts.
This camera was placed 14 feet up a pine tree. I had to use tree spikes to climb up there to place the camea. I removed the spikes. Therefore, the owner of the hand is very tall to be able to reach it from the side instead of from the bottom.
thats definatly a bigfoot hand..you can tell by how dirty it was because bigfoot doesnt wash his hands and those long finger nails also.keep up the great work
My cameras were not missing. Just entirely beat up. As for some human messing with it, this area is very big and heavily wooded. I sometimes have troubles finding my own cameras. Let alone someone guessing where I was and showing up with a fake monster hand? Probably not. I did get another hand last year that was long, slender, with grey skin and red hair.
it kinda of reminds me of the 'fake' alien hands (that were in handcuffs) during the press conference in Arizona when the governor(politician) says" you are all way too serious"
hmm my take on this vid though, I would say prob human hand(s) at work at 0:14 you can see the thumb and it definately looks like a persons thumb... BUT..
doesn't explain the pinky finger looking abnormally short, could be caused by a cam phenomenon. no visible hair?
Yes, it is in one of my posted clips from last year. It is not open handed, but closed fisted. You can see the knuckles, hair and fore fingers. It will be with a picture of the hand owners face. However it is blury due to the close proximity and different type of camera.
It is in the last half of Bigfoot is Still Active. It looks very dark on You-Tube, but there is a better photo of it on my website in the photo gallery.
Very interesting. Hand looks very human except for the seemingly abnormally long fingers. Then when you add in the prints, it does get puzzling indeed. Great video.
Something isn't right with the fingers Mitch. There is something abnormally long about them. Too long for even a human. I don't know if it could be a bigfoot or something altogether different entirely. Study 1:10 which provides the best shot of the fingers.
That is what caught my attention. At first I thought it was my hands when I went to take the camera down, but then I got a glimpse of the fingers...Anyone know how to get a hold of Meldrum?
Yes, I have his address and phone number somewhere in my files. Let me go through them and I'll send it over asap ok? He works at university, last info I had.
I have no idea of what a bigfoot hand should look like. But I can tell you this isn't human. As far as someone messing with the camera, this is not likely. This camera is not near any roads and is in very dense territory. Takes a great deal of effort to get there. There were three people when I set this camera up. One was my grandson and the other was my brother. Grandson doesn't drive, and brother would never do that.
Its a Baby bigfoot. mama was around. they let them explore and tamper with things. But usually you will see the younger Bigfoots in trees. And the skinny long fingers is because its a baby. thats all. Not as much hair as an Adult Bigfoot. Thats all.
and the camera was 14' up? That would indicate a sasquatch about 9' or 10' tall with nice long arms. Could those hand prints in the mud possibly be foot prings where the foot slid backwards leaving lond toe prints?
The fingers were all about the same diameter and only four. The big toe would be there if it were a foot and it would be bigger than the rest. That's why I thought them to be hand prints.
So what do you think the squatch was doing? Wiping off it's fingers or getting them a bit dirty so it could grip something better? Of course there's no way of telling, but those are two possibilities.
I think they were marking the creek to where anything past the mark was visible from the camp. Another words, don't go past this point, they (the humans) can see you.
If they're messing with your cam then cover it with bees wax in a covert fashion, offsite or whatever. To me that hand looks human and you've had any number of people familiar with your site there. No hair on that hand whatsoever and terribly manicured looking hand. The length of fingers appears to be caused by lens. Not saying it's not but sure looks pampered and distorted. Take a pic of your own hand and see if you have distortion on your LEFT hand.
I tried messing with the camera to dupliicate the hand. My hand still has stubby fingers no matter what I do. Besides if it was my hand, you would see nails. I have fairly long nails including the thumb and index finger. Definately not mine.
The camera was up a tree approx 14 feet. It didn't seem to have any troubles pummeling my camera. I've lost 5 cameras. They just quit working. I think this one might be an older juvenile. No way to tell for sure.
Hard to believe that a human who wanted to steal this camera wasnt able to take it off the tree, noway it was a human being
Hawk1545 3 weeks ago
Juvenile squatch?
rodslinger86 1 month ago
Those are some of the most delicate looking Bigfoot fingers ever.
mdv409 9 months ago
Try filming the same kind of motions yourself using your hand. The deformities could be something funky with the focus or shutter speed or something.
unknownpoltroon 1 year ago
@unknownpoltroon We have tried to duplicate it, and was not able to do it. Besides, they match the prints in the mud. That is no opitcal illusion.
SUSANFARNS 1 year ago
I'm no expert, but if that is a human hand it is really deformed. Start around 1:08 and keep your finger on the play/pause button. Around 1:10 you'll get a good shot of the hand. Notice how thin the entire hand is and then the thin elongated fingers. NOT HUMAN!
971QKE 1 year ago
@bigfootproofsite Any suggestions?
SUSANFARNS 1 year ago
or an alien hand??? definately not a wookie...
revskull 1 year ago
@revskull It's kind of funny how there are those who would rather think an alien was running around in the forest climbing 14 feet up a tree to mess with my cameras or play in the mud. Keep in mind the mud print cooberates the photos and that they were taken about about 6 miles and several weeks appart. Notice how the mud print below the palm and on the arm was made from hair. 11 inches from plam to tip of the longest finger
SUSANFARNS 1 year ago
azvideoguy (3 weeks ago) Fingers seem elongated, but it is a optical illusion caused by fast movement. Probably a poacher trying to mess with the camera or steal it.
dude...pause it at 0:14 and tell me do poachers have those kinds of fingers!!...this is whats irritating..susanfarns is tryin their best and show all they have and people still claim its somethin else..a poacher would steal the damn cameras..if they can steal game and poach they will take a darn camera...its a no brainer
fokai1980 2 years ago
I did fingerprint the camera. I got one good print on the infared motion sensor. The rest were smears. I did a video called "Bigfoot fingerprints" in which I show the prints.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Do you have any kind of link to the photo in the newspaper you mentioned? I'd like to see it. Surely its online somewhere. Thanks
TheFlames40 2 years ago
For those interested, I did pick up a fingerprint kit and I will be dusting the camera ASAP. It is good I didn't go hang it back up in the trees again.
NewsPaper? Maybe you mean the Phoenix Magazine, October 2009 issue. Or the Channel 3 (Phoenix) video? There are links to those at my web site.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
You just never know. It would be worth printing though if for nothing but further reference.
Could have been an optical illusion of poacher/prankster or a big guy. The image is just too unclear. One thing is certain, they know cameras and they don't like them. Camera shy doesn't begin to express it. It seems like they know that a pic capture would be bad for them. Weird.
TheFlames40 2 years ago
Whatever was playing with the camera sure has long fingers. If it was a human then I'm thinking the camera might have disappeared. Humans being honest as they are. Strange capture though.
hillbilly482 2 years ago
Fingers seem elongated, but it is a optical illusion caused by fast movement. Probably a poacher trying to mess with the camera or steal it.
azvideoguy 2 years ago
The hand movement is in the wrong direction to cause the optical illusion due to fast movement. In both cases the hand is moving upward, not across with the length of the fingers. And then there is the mud prints. Not an obtical illusion there. One of my cameras gave up some hair. Microscopic examination shows no medula and matches BF hair found in MD, CA and Or,
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
There was a photo taken and posted in the twin cities newspaper of a bigfoot. It too was taken by a game camera. They state the creature is right at 7 feet tall. Measuring the hand and the height, a ratio is developed and the hand length can be calculated. They are approximately 11 inches long with the fingers being longer than the palm of the hand (not Human proportions). And get this--no fur or hair on the hands.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
@SUSANFARNS Were you able to lift fingerprints from your camera?
Malocosa 2 years ago
No. I had not even thought about that. I wouldn't even begin to know where to get the dust or brushes. Or what to do once I got the prints. I still have the cameras, I suppose I could give it a try and then post photos on the internet for someone to run or ID as non human.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Does anyone know where I can purchase a fingerprint kit? And, what should I be looking for in fingerprints? Or should I be looking for anything that doesn't look right. I know footprint dermal ridges run differently than humans. Does anyone know that Bigfoot's fingerprints should look like?
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
@SUSANFARNS there's another video on YT showing someone lifting BF Fingerprints here: /watch?v=ih_MTgvr0Mc
Malocosa 2 years ago
Ok, I went and purchased a fingerprint kit and dusted my entire camera. Most of it was smudges and non usuable. However, on the movement sensor there was a print. I managed to pull it off. I don't know much about fingerprints, but I do know human prints curl or swirl. These dermal ridges are straight. No curl to them. They could be human, but then again, maybe not. I will post them for people to look at to get their opinion since I know no fingerprint experts.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
This camera was placed 14 feet up a pine tree. I had to use tree spikes to climb up there to place the camea. I removed the spikes. Therefore, the owner of the hand is very tall to be able to reach it from the side instead of from the bottom.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Thats is really creepy. Theres something strange out there.
cxd4 2 years ago
This MOST defanitly is not a "bigfoot" hand !!! Looks Alien to me !!
73roadrunner1 2 years ago
where can I find yr website, Susanfarns, greetings from the Netherlands
mildredpierce1 2 years ago
It is listed at the end of each video clip. I can't list it here. There is an email contact on the web site too.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Very strange, That is a primate hand for sure.
craig4465 2 years ago
thats definatly a bigfoot hand..you can tell by how dirty it was because bigfoot doesnt wash his hands and those long finger nails also.keep up the great work
pigsinspace123 2 years ago
Comment removed
jda1961 2 years ago
My cameras were not missing. Just entirely beat up. As for some human messing with it, this area is very big and heavily wooded. I sometimes have troubles finding my own cameras. Let alone someone guessing where I was and showing up with a fake monster hand? Probably not. I did get another hand last year that was long, slender, with grey skin and red hair.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
still have it? is it on your channel right now?
it kinda of reminds me of the 'fake' alien hands (that were in handcuffs) during the press conference in Arizona when the governor(politician) says" you are all way too serious"
hmm my take on this vid though, I would say prob human hand(s) at work at 0:14 you can see the thumb and it definately looks like a persons thumb... BUT..
doesn't explain the pinky finger looking abnormally short, could be caused by a cam phenomenon. no visible hair?
ibfrdb 2 years ago
But.. you might have the Most advanced evolved civilized strain of bigfoot in your research area.
Can you tell me more about the soda the 'BF' took out of your cooler? was it a can(pop top) or bottle?
ibfrdb 2 years ago
The soda was a can of diet coke, very shiney and wet..
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Yes, it is in one of my posted clips from last year. It is not open handed, but closed fisted. You can see the knuckles, hair and fore fingers. It will be with a picture of the hand owners face. However it is blury due to the close proximity and different type of camera.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
It is in the last half of Bigfoot is Still Active. It looks very dark on You-Tube, but there is a better photo of it on my website in the photo gallery.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
You know the hands I found online were part of a set with a mask too, so maybe someone really was messin with you.
marvelhd 2 years ago
I was just doing an art assignment involving alien hands and those you have there look very close to what i had going on. Just creapy...
marvelhd 2 years ago
Very interesting. Hand looks very human except for the seemingly abnormally long fingers. Then when you add in the prints, it does get puzzling indeed. Great video.
rjdalchow 2 years ago
The fingers look very human. I've had people climb up in trees and mess with my cameras before.
derekfoot 2 years ago
Does this camera have a convex lens? If it does, it could distort the image a little especially if the subject it that close.
Raylroad72 2 years ago
I pulled out the same camera today and tried to recreat the hand. It's not the camera or lens. My fingers are still fat and stubby.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Something isn't right with the fingers Mitch. There is something abnormally long about them. Too long for even a human. I don't know if it could be a bigfoot or something altogether different entirely. Study 1:10 which provides the best shot of the fingers.
justagrrlinny 2 years ago
That is what caught my attention. At first I thought it was my hands when I went to take the camera down, but then I got a glimpse of the fingers...Anyone know how to get a hold of Meldrum?
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Yes, I have his address and phone number somewhere in my files. Let me go through them and I'll send it over asap ok? He works at university, last info I had.
justagrrlinny 2 years ago
I have no idea of what a bigfoot hand should look like. But I can tell you this isn't human. As far as someone messing with the camera, this is not likely. This camera is not near any roads and is in very dense territory. Takes a great deal of effort to get there. There were three people when I set this camera up. One was my grandson and the other was my brother. Grandson doesn't drive, and brother would never do that.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
I would like to hear from Jeff Meldrum and what he thinks. I do not want to bug him, but I think he might be interested in this.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
Its a Baby bigfoot. mama was around. they let them explore and tamper with things. But usually you will see the younger Bigfoots in trees. And the skinny long fingers is because its a baby. thats all. Not as much hair as an Adult Bigfoot. Thats all.
drmassone 2 years ago
did you find any tracks in that snow?
wyleecoyotee 2 years ago
It looks like snow, but it isn't. That is the IR lighting on the grass and bushes. It's all green stuff. There was a lot of pushdown, but no tracks.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
and the camera was 14' up? That would indicate a sasquatch about 9' or 10' tall with nice long arms. Could those hand prints in the mud possibly be foot prings where the foot slid backwards leaving lond toe prints?
wyleecoyotee 2 years ago
The fingers were all about the same diameter and only four. The big toe would be there if it were a foot and it would be bigger than the rest. That's why I thought them to be hand prints.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
So what do you think the squatch was doing? Wiping off it's fingers or getting them a bit dirty so it could grip something better? Of course there's no way of telling, but those are two possibilities.
wyleecoyotee 2 years ago
I think they were marking the creek to where anything past the mark was visible from the camp. Another words, don't go past this point, they (the humans) can see you.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
If they're messing with your cam then cover it with bees wax in a covert fashion, offsite or whatever. To me that hand looks human and you've had any number of people familiar with your site there. No hair on that hand whatsoever and terribly manicured looking hand. The length of fingers appears to be caused by lens. Not saying it's not but sure looks pampered and distorted. Take a pic of your own hand and see if you have distortion on your LEFT hand.
BFResearchSE 2 years ago
damn grey aliens always getting in the way of our BF research.
mhatsko 2 years ago
Alien? Bigfoot? I wouldn't mind catching a good picture of either one. Actually, I have caught a hand before. It had grey skin and red hair.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
That's the first thought I had too.
hillbilly482 2 years ago
I tried messing with the camera to dupliicate the hand. My hand still has stubby fingers no matter what I do. Besides if it was my hand, you would see nails. I have fairly long nails including the thumb and index finger. Definately not mine.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago
think it maybe a juvenile ?
Bigftsotherncal 2 years ago
The camera was up a tree approx 14 feet. It didn't seem to have any troubles pummeling my camera. I've lost 5 cameras. They just quit working. I think this one might be an older juvenile. No way to tell for sure.
SUSANFARNS 2 years ago