Added: 4 years ago
From: darkwinglh
Views: 54,837
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (215)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what do all videos of BF have in common. only Pattys has some unobstructed views. guess if yr making a hoax u sure don't want a costume to have no foliage in front of it.. P is real and i hope it's always the 'right' people who know it, and that they, too, destroy any proof that endangers.. anything.. that's at great risk of being exploited.

    hey everyone, what would you do with,say, irrefutable genetic proof? and if you cud provide a location w 98% likelihood of a capture?

  • remember people the original film this is not! this is a copy of a copy of a copy of a crappy copy! you can't even see the original anymore! it has the detail that would blow your mind! Bigfoot is real and out there I hope we never find it!

  • You know, this does bring up a valid point though about the buttocks. They're very clearly defined on the ape, but the Patty just has one big round furry mass of a butt with no definition. Why?

  • @TheSnuzzle Actually that is not true. On another video, it shows a frame which shows a very distinct buttcrack. Besides, she has more fur on her ass than that gorilla.

  • Comment removed

  • if there really was a bigfoot, wouldnt it already be found. seriously. most of the terrain in the jungles are explored. scientists are finding tiny bugs in remote regions all over the world. yet they can't find a 8 ft tall smelly ape? Don't you guys watch all the documentaries claiming to look for bigfoot? whats the result. always 100% they never find one. They make tons of money with those shows though, because people want to believe it.

  • @donisthabomb1 Actually most of the terrain in jungles HASN"T been explored. Not sure why you think it has been. There are still locations which haven't been fully explored. Just because one researcher walks a mountain trail and doesn't see anything doesn't mean a forest has been 100% explored. People tend to stick to trails and commonly walked paths, animals only occationally enter these paths. Only when researchers look off the beaten path do they find the really unique creatures.

  • @donisthabomb1 its part of living. i want to have faith in something that i cant see. There is no reason that this creature known as bigfoot can't exist.

  • It's real, sorry but in all likelihood it really is. -Hopefully you can recreate it, no one's done it so far...

  • bigfoot might be real but anyone who still thinks patty isnt a hoax are out with the fairies !!!!

  • I saw an interesting document on National Geographics channel. Scientists got the original Patterson film from Pattersons widow. They measured the creature to be about 250 cm (8.2 ft.). Legs are relatively shorter than human legs so it excludes using of extended legs. They also notized perfect anatomy of the body/muscles, and compared it to human body. There was a significan difference which says it's hard to believe it's a suit. I cant say is this real or hoax but indeed interesting features.

  • Comment removed

  • Notice how the Gorilla has a butt crack and the Big Foot doesn't? I mean, isn't that an obvious problem? How does the Big Foot eliminate waste for cripes sake?

  • It's got an ass like my mother in law

  • Yea retrobloke the indians chill with bigfoot on their shitty reservations all the time

  • @retrobloke78 Your stereotyping and disdain of other cultures and animals is disgusting. It's unfortunate that people like you are alive.

  • @retrobloke78 Maybe you misunderstood the point: that skeptics make ridiculous claims that people are misidentifying bears as Bigfoot. Indians that live in the forest, and hunted bears and other animals, depended on their knowledge of those animals for survival. An indian that sees a bear would never claim it was a Bigfoot - plain & simple. The native peoples acknowledge the existence of Bigfoot. Let me ask you, when is the last time you lived among other animals in the wilderness?

  • Regarding the white feet, I will throw this into the mix: I suspect a primate who spends its life walking barefoot in the woods/mountains would have a very densely calloused sole, covered with thick highly keratinized epithelial tissue, which covers the melanocytes at the granulosum layer. Scratch your skin to notice a white line. Now imagine the entire surface of thick keratinocytes being constantly abraded by walking. Also, melanocytes are less where "the sun don't shine".

  • Actually, it's the other way around...quite obviously extremely depressing to the 'skeptics' that it is in fact a true living being they merely can't wrap their heads around possibly being real...

  • That is just overexposure of this particular clip or print. People are always on about her 'white feet', in actuality her soles have a lighter color because of the soil/wet mud stuck to her feet, same color as the ground. Couple that with the aforementioned overexposure on some prints you see, the age of the film, the fact that colors fade with time and that her skin (soles) might actually be of a much lighter tone, plus sun light hitting her... What do you get then - 'white', right. Simple.

  • @komodoman admit it, its a guy in a suit. I'm sorry if thats depressing to you that your bigfoot doesnt really exist.

  • @donisthabomb1 fool... you don't even know.

  • @komodoman Many Bigfoot videos contain creatures with Ostman's pads ie the grey/white pads on the bottom of the feet

  • @komodoman i agree. i dont think there is any ape on this earth that has hair on the souls f their feet or palm of their hands. (including humans of course)

  • @komodoman

    Nothing suit like?

    what about the white Material at the bottom of her foot?

  • @thehumanbirdie many primates including humans have light colored foot pads.

  • i hate to piss on your bonfire but this video is so fake (for so many reasons, look at the soles of its feet for crying out loud!) get over it it's been 60 years already yeesh! bigfoots dont exist sorry

  • @lilmissfarah I'm always curious to hear what skeptics have to say about this video and all you can advise is to look at the sole of the feet???? I reckon the only fake thing around here is you!! Looks like your nappy worked effectively coz your filthy diseased urine never got close to my bonfire.

  • @amakdissi79

    HAHAHAAAA i find your anger hilarious, seriously get over it. ps, yes the soles of his feet - looks like ugg boots, not like actual animal feet

  • @lilmissfarah Yeah...that's why Peter Burke from Jim Henson's creature shop said "I have no idea how they would have made a suit like this in 1967." How do YOU know what the soles of an unknown primate's feet would look like??

  • @joeyvader

    how would i know? i study anatomy, so i know how the muscles of the feet work and how evolutionary adapted primates are and if you study any human, chimp, orangutan etc you can see a definitave pattern in both our hands and feet. how would they make a suit that looked like that? i dunno, maybe some fur, a gorilla mask, yes it looks divine but people can do and have done wonders with textiles for centuries now.

  • @lilmissfarah if you ever get the chance to look at a chimp or orang's feet and hands close up,you would be in no doubt what is real and what is a pair of as you put it" ug boots" I cannot believe this is still being touted on here as genuine. and i see their best defence is someone who worked for jim henson said he didn't know how they could of made it..well they did.It walks like a man in a suit.an it looks like all be it for the time a good one,but still a suit.especially the padded rear end

  • @nastymonsters1 And a real gorillas butt looks "padded" too

  • @nastymonsters1 Facts:

    1. Patterson went to his grave saying they filmed a real creature, Gimlin still verifies it's authenticity.

    2. Anatomists concluded it is physically impossible for a human to have this shoulder breadth & ankle movement.

    3. Hundreds of similar sighting are still seen each year - not just this one

    If it helps you sleep at night, then believe it's a costume, but the reality is that these creatures exist independent of belief.

  • @banthamobile Thank you. I know from personal experience these creatures exist. The skeptics are those who refuse to accept that something exists outside of their "normal" realm of experience. They dismiss out of hand and have no real curiosity or interest in challenging their belief systems.

  • @grejambri You're absolutely right. Skeptics dismiss theses creatures simply because they haven't seen one, and can't wrap their small minds around the idea. If you've seen one, you're very fortunate, because they rarely allow themselves to be seen by certain people. My father's people are Iroquois indian - our tribe and many other tribes have seen the "Bigfoot" animal-people for centuries. Indians that live in the wilderness know more about its inhabitants than city dwellers can understand.

  • @lilmissfarah drop me a message would love to discuss primate anatomy.

  • @lilmissfarah Ugg boots??? Are you sure its not air jordan snikers!

  • Has anybody asked himself the question why everybody seems to assume that Bigfoot is immortal?

  • @BenHeffernan

    Immaculate Conception. Ever seen a bigfoot committing a sin?

  • i want to find bigfoot but i dont want people lock him up and study him as is bound to happen if hes found but i do want to find a bigfoot and show it humans arent scary

  • it was going to walmart, funny has arrived yet or returned to this area ever since

  • there so many fake vids about bigfoot on youtube and if this one is fake they sure did a good job, this was done in the 60s and no one can do it better almost 50 years later. and thats what makes me wonder if this is real.

  • Sorry it's not, Baldy. A human couldn't even reach Patty's head to get inside a mask, from the waist up she's basically too tall evidently not sporting BobH's mushroom corpus, his own body's limited by what limits every human on this planet regardless of height. Not even actors in their cute dresses can escape it, this damning bodily evidence preventing their realistic portrayal of Bigfoots; human anatomy vs. reported Bigfoot anatomy. You actually ought to applaud this, as it reveals fakes.

  • The world is full of "experts" A human can walk that way .. because this is one .. in a suit... you don't need to be an "expert' in anything to see that.. we see humans walking every day of our lives.. we can claim to be expert on that..

  • They're not commenting on it, are they? Easy, see. Same with UFOs. Let it be. Easy. Let others tlak and be the kooks, you'd never trust your super power Government ever again if they did talk... You live in the United States of Wonderland, seymour, I'm amazed you're not willing to admit that...

  • At least keep your conspiracy theories straight Komo. First you said the government was keeping bigfoot secret when I asked how come no one had ever found a specimen. Then when I asked how the government could keep all bigfoot in the whole country hidden you say they're not. No wonder you Bigfooters have no credibilty---you can't even keep your own fairy tales straight.

  • They're not getting to them, seymour, that's the whole idea...they're ignoring it all and probably leaving them alone. Which isn't too difficult by the way in a big country like the US, I suppose they've figured just let them be spotted from time to time, you can't help that anyway. 'Let the lunatic fringe believe in them, we don't have to do anything'... Piece of cake. So discovery will happen when discovery will happen, there's no rush...

  • Please explain to me Komo how in a country as big as the USA that the government can get to every Bigfoot and space ship,unicorn and whatever else you say they're hiding? Explain that please. Like I said your excuses are just that...excuses.

  • Mr. Gorilla needs longer legs and a lower forehead.

  • It's the same with UFOs too seymour, I'm afraid your leaders are pussies and under the thumb of others...you're all in a way both slaves and victims of your past, there are certain rules and traditions none of you can break at will, the primary one being religion the other one being that almighty green paper stuff... The problem with you is you accept staus quo, and refuse to dig and look deeper...because what you'll find is way too scary and complicated. Not in itself, but the repercussions...

  • No not reasons,excuses. Reasons are proven. The reason an airplane rises is the lift generated over the top of the wing. The reason a rock falls to the ground if you drop it is gravity. Bigfoot hasn't been found because the president doesn't want it to happen is an EXCUSE. For it to be a reason ,once again,you'd need proof. And I know the word "proof" is like poison to you.

  • These aren't excuses, seymour - they're reasons. And they're all good. Plenty of food, shelter and space to live in - and not enough pesty people bothering them. So instead of wondering about these perfectly natural reasons, you should start digging into what is more likely the real reason we have no body on (official) display...perhaps your founding fathers and leaders and preachers and bosses don't want it. Yeah, that's a much better probable cause...unfortunately.

  • Wet sand,faded film,hard to work cameras,yadda yadda yadda. Doesn't it get old Komo having to come up with another silly excuse why no evidence of bigfoot exists? We could clear cut all trees from the Rockies to the Cali coast and see no bigfoot and you'd say Bigfoot lived underground.Always more excuses,never any proof.

  • Actually I'm perfectly aware there's no perfect evidence or final proof yet, does that change anything at all...no. Keep saying the feet are white, I think your feet or anyone's feet would look like that too on an old color-faded 16mm film looking like crap here on YT, especially after you'd stepped in wet sand... Now who's in denial...I'm afraid it's you, seymour.

  • No the feet are the first thing anyone notices especially on close up versions of the film. Featureless toeless flat white soles---impossible on a beast of this sort. Speaking of proof there isn't one speck of scientific evidence bigfoot exists. That is a fact you're in denial about.

  • You wanna talk proof, seymour? Give me some then, all you've blastered about is rumors and what you'd like it to be like leather soles. And now we hear you think it's a Stooges costume, and I thought I'd heard it all. Show me Costello/Stooges ape suits that look like this, I know you don't even buy your own drivel...it's just that, drivel. What features are you on about, you expect to see dermal ridges there? You even realize their feet ARE flat? You're just spamming here, a perfect denier.

  • Exactly 211. The flat featureless leather soles of this ape costume was one of the earliest indicators that this thing was fake. Its the same leather soles we've all seen in dozens of ape costumes from cheapo B movies. This Patty costume is probably one we've seen on screen chasing the 3 Stooges or Abbott and Costello.

  • Nice compariso to a gorilla suite and all but wheres the toes on the creature?

    See the right foot and try to find the toes on the costume foot.

    The scary thing is adults believe this is real!!Have a child watch it and see what they say.

  • Once again Komo you sidestep when confronted with responding to someone who disagrees with you. Between sidestepping and personal attacks you post very little of anything that would help support your viewpoint. Of course when you've no scientific proof I guess all you can do is shuck and jive.

  • Stop babblin', seymour...

  • Yeah yeah I know it couldn't be a guy in a suit no way---i heard the same babble from the dogman gable film bunch who said there wasn't any way a human could do those moves.they were wrong

    . And this patterson creature is way simpler than gable was. Stop drinking the kool-aid. Think rationally.

  • seymour, of course you haven't considered that since these creatures obviously are primates like us, extremely humanlike even, there'll always be similarities...so who knows, if shown incorrectly they may actually resemble us...

  • These Bigfoot 'people' aren't gorillas or even any apes/animals, in my opinion anyhoo.

  • Actually the more I look at gorillas, the less I believe this is real...

  • @GhostyFilms The more I believe this is real, the less I look at gorillas...

  • @joeyvader I'm not sure what to infer from your comment.

  • There isnt a mammal on this contenant that hasnt been discovered on the grill of a semi truck.Countless reports of them running across roads and you misunderstood me the casts have toes not the creature in the video.Why do you get insulting when someone sheds doubt?Is your mind only open to believing the video is real?

  • Right you are of course, joey, female primates must have breasts too. No biggie. People only have male Bigfoots in mind, yet there must be females too and that happened to be what they ran into...

  • Wow a guirella suit looks like a guirella!

  • @thewormbin Your profile maintains that you enjoy 'educational' books....I suggest that the next one you purchase be a spelling primer...

  • @joeyvader I challenge you to watch more of these patterson bigfoot videos and find the toes on its feet.Patterson took casts of the footprints and there were toes. Your just mad because other people challenged your beliefs when it should be you challenging your own beliefs.

  • @thewormbin "Patterson took casts of the footprints and there were toes."...funny...every pic I see of him holding up the feet show toes...a quick google will confirm this.. Do you type in Braille too???

  • Gorillas arent that tall.

  • @seymourbrest When you find one, check it's ass and let us know too.

  • well i thought i would finally put this to rest. i am real but those vids are not me and i dont live in the woods.... i live in wolverhampton , england . there are lots of us here infact thousands, our ancesters came from africa, but we tell everyone were jamaican, sounds cooler. hope this clears it up for you

  • Dumb, dumber, peak199...

  • I understand that perfectly, yes. Also, I don't think renowned scientists would even dare conclude it's real if there's any chance someone would one day turn up with the suit, or more footage/pics to porve it's fake. That'D make them look really silly, so I'm guessing they know what they're talking about when they conclude it's real and no hoax.

  • lo unico parecido es su trasero xD

  • Why don't you just forget about it then, if you think it's a costume...it's only getting old if/when you go on...

  • Yeah, because they created a costume of a Bigfoot and thought, this was so easy, lets throw some breasts on it!!! That has always struck me as peculiar. I mean, how is that detail even a part of the thought process? I guess that in a weird way the fact that this appears to be a female creature has always actually made me believe it is a real creature even more. Do you understand why I would say that?

  • @jasonjmj

    Why are people so baffled by the tits? Patterson drew a female bigfoot with tits in his book before the footage was ever shot, he based his drawing on the Rowe encounter with a female bigfoot, he even took the picture out of the book when he re-released it after the footage was shot... Why not add tits? It made people think it was real didn't it?

  • @GilbertSyndrome ..Actually Patterson's drawing looks nothing like Rowes drawing...at all...Patterson's drawings look nothing like the subject in the PGF...Rowe's drawing does though...I'm amazed at how the skeptics use this to illustrate the hoax...if Roe drew a female, then someone filmed one, would they NOT look similar??

  • @joeyvader

    I don't use this to illustrate any hoax, i just find it interesting because people talk about how strange an encounter with a female bigfoot is when Roger wrote about the Rowe encounter in his book and drew a picture of a female bigfoot....

  • @joeyvader

    Exactly. Most of Patterson's drawings don't look like Patty or the Roe image. Most of Patterson's drawings of bigfoot look more like a cave man than a bipedal ape creature. 'Patty' looks very much like the Roe image. If Roe really saw a bigfoot then why wouldn't Patty look very similar to it? She would, and that's why Patty is unlike Roger's misinformed drawings. Have you seen Roger Patterson's drawings of the Albert Ostman encounter? They are nothing like Patty.

  • rofl

  • LOL...gorilla suit...nice one..hoho, no actually it's a Santa suit... {:-]

  • YOU MEAN, a gorila walk like that? it's imposible.

  • They actually appear to have some kind of a language, it's gibberish to us, but according to vocal expert Steve Nelson (his interview on talkblogradio) it sounds almost Asian(!).

    :-)

  • Their mannerisms are often described as very humanlike, it's merely the deceiving fact that they're hairy, that makes us think they're 'apes'. They seem almost afraid to hurt us, and always break off any bluff attack, or simply walk away. I'd sure like to know their exact level of intelligence, should be interesting to find out one day. Curious but kind gentle giants. Any advice would be to leave them be, not go after them with guns. You can't remove it anyway, and may feel hands in your neck...

  • No clothes, no fire, no tools, no language = ape!! To me anyway! There is evidence that our ancestors hunted Gigantos in the past...could this have caused them to adapt their behaviour, as a defence mech, and shun humans at all costs?? Imagine if gorillas were genetically hard-wired to avoid humans...we may not know of them, save for tribal legend and folklore...

  • Gorillas walk differently. They walk from side to side, while Bigfoot walks almost human-like.

  • You're a crybaby, Gilly.

  • Dum, Bigfoot's a primate - not a fish with fins...

  • And you can also clearly see here, how the make-up on the gorillas in the Planet of the Apes films, are based on real gorillas. Patty's head is not, she also has that typical hunched-over Bigfoot no-neck posture with (turning!) head set low. Absolutely no fake, simply not (humanly) possible, but we have plenty of factual deniers out there.

  • How many deer have YOU seen in the wild?

  • I can walk out the door in the morning and look down the hollow toward the ford and watch deer cross at least twice a week. I assume they are "in the wild" as you say since the farmers can't keep them out of the orchards and certainly would if they could. I would be hard pressed to describe a "typical" posture of a deer.

    Tell everyone how many sasquatches you have laid eyes on to be able to describe the posture as "typical". As Mr. Spock might say; "I find it illogical Captain".

  • Hmm...

  • I saw a photo of Bob H. standing beside a sports car in 1967. He was 6 foot plus but weighed only 150lbs. His jeans looked to be size 28inch waist. No one of 150lbs. and skinny as a matchstick man could walk in that sized suit. It's Not Going To Happen! O.K. heatherssss get over it!!

  • Human or animal doesn't really matter to me ultimately, they are what they are and they're definitely there, that's the main important thing to me. One day we'll see and find out more, right now it's all just speculations.

  • Well, that's part of the mystery then isn't it? Longtime Biggy researcher Bobbie Short does not believe the Sas' to be an ape, but a type of human.

    I personally disagree; in any case, we may just need to widen our definition of what an ape is a bit in order to include the Sasquatch.

    Along those lines, I've read that some native tribes regarded them as a type of human, while others saw them as animals, and still others as interdimensional beings.

  • we know its not a gorilla otherwise it would of been called patterson video of escaped gorilla but its called BIGFOOT B-I-G-F-O-O-T bigfoot not escaped gorilla

  • There are numerous compelling features that suggest the Patterson footage is real. This comparison is good. Also, look at the Snowwalker footage. This creature has the same posture, arm ratios and conformation. I also show why the claim that Bob H is the man in the Patterson footage is false due to locomotion differences. The mistake that Bob and Morris made was having him walk in that suit!! They should have left well enough alone. This proved that Bob H is not related to the Patterson film.

  • If this isnt the real deal then someone really has to much ti me on there hands.

  • Judging by historic tales, they appear more human than ape. They're 'apes' with a mumbling language resembling a drunken hobo (if we are to believe the Morehead tapes, but why wouldn't they utter something), they also appear to be building huts with roofs, venture curiously close to human homes, throw stuff. Not all of this is like gorillas, orangutangs or chimps, but a so-far known human trait exclusively. Only when we find them will we know exactly, but my money's on some kind of 'people'.

  • There is no 'cased closed' on this case, the jury's still out - probably will be forever - but all the evidence is mightily in favor of Patty being the real deal. That body is a wonder of nature, IMO, deffo no suit. You'd have to be pretty naive not to (want to) see that. Most serious experts say so, only the armchair doctors think differently. Live in sheltered denial if it makes you happier, heather, but you couldn't be more wrong. Inadvertently you also help them by being ignorant. :)

  • This film has withstood 40+ years of intense scrutiny from scientists,photography experts,special effects wizards etc. and no one has been able to duplicate the suit with TODAYS material and technology,much less what was available in 67! This is the real deal folks. I know some dont want to believe it because it messes with their religion and long held belief system but sasquatch exist folks.

  • I have a religous friend (I'm not)that asked me one day, that if a Sasquatch was every found, if I believed that this would prove evolution, and thus crumble all religous beliefs the world over. I told him that it was my belief that these were apes....not in the human family at all...

  • Well, I would beg to differ. I myslef am CERTAINLY not religious, and I believe that if Sasquatch is ever found. (and someday they will be, Im almost positive) That it WILL prove evolution.

  • If gorillas don't prove evolution, how would these animals? They are nothing more than bipedal apes...

  • This film has withstood 40+ years of intense scrutiny from scientists,photography experts,special effects wizards etc. and no one has been able to duplicate the suit with TODAYS material and technology,much less what was available in 67! This is the real deal folks. I know some dont want to believe it because it messes with their religion and long held belief system but sasquatch exist folks.

  • and ure point

  • Yeah...his name is Bob Heironimus! Just type his name into youtube, and see his montage od stills in his new suit! He is wearing a suit that was made by Philip Morris, who claims to have made the original suit! Same guy, in a suit made by the original suit-maker! One has to wonder though...why do we only get a 'montage' of blurry stills? Why does the new suit look so laughable?? It has NO resemblance to the Patterson subject! And THAT is 'case closed'!!

  • Because the deep technical stuff..proves it isnt a human in a suit.Locomotion experts the word over have all agreed ...a human cant walk that way ...case closed.

  • @Poe397 i can walk that way now SHUUT UP

  • @dmz2002 obviously you know nothing about it as no human can walk in exactly or even nearly the same rotating fashion,So ....no I will not shut up.

  • @Poe397 shut up

  • @Poe397 your a complete moron...."deep technical stuff" get a life loser