It's odd that the intro touts Griffin's Christian faith, because his staunch 9/11 truther stance demonstrates a hateful, suspicious, malevolent view of humanity that's at odds with Christ's teachings.
Griffin has made a lot of money and become an alt-media celebrity selling books pandering to people's suspicion, resentment, and paranoia. Truly, how much less Christian can his message be?
1) The World Trade Center (WTC) twin towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions.
This is how the collapses may have appeared to non-experts, but demolition experts point out many differences:
• Demolition professionals always blow the bottom floors of a structure first, but the WTC tower collapses began at the upper levels, where the planes hit the buildings.
@BlatendCrude You dont get it. I know the firememen and witnesses reported explosions and pop pop pop etc. I know this
I just added that link from a US gov website to show how they try to cover things up. Building 7 the 47 story CIA building that collapsed at 5.20pm that evening collapsed in exactly the same way as a controlled demo according to A US GOV website
@ctcole77 Missile was only what part of the people in 911 truth movement believes. Some of us still think it is a plane. And frankly, I have no idea what happened. I only know that US government didn't tell me the truth. I don't believe what they said. And that's it. Nothing more to it. I don't claim the knowledge of what actually happened. And this movement is about just that. An offical investigation and find out the truth. None of us claims we know the truth, we only know government lied.
the 'landing gear that somehow got to the roof of 45 Park place , guess what , Building owned by a well known Zionist. Now this site is home for the latest anti Islamic initiative the ground Zero mosque
did you know that Mark Loizeaux of controlled demolition had been in WTC7 two months before????? I wonder if he had popped in for bagels with his friend Larry
Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)
as for the fire weakening the steel argument , what we saw was two buildings on fire and then a suddenn instant collapse to the basement
Does that seem like a localised fire weakening some beams ? if that had been the case the building would lean to one side , no the OCT is untrue and against common sense
@thisisyourwakeup David Ray Griffin is a snakeoil peddler. He is a player in the cottage industry known as 9/11 "truth". He has been discredited several times over by know. He makes a living by telling lies with every keystroke and word he can muster.
No, it's "know". I wrote it that way, and there it is.
"can you name the lies?"
Sure. Google "Screw Loose Change" and plug "Griffin" into their search engine. You'll get the phone book. One I remember off the top of my head is when he tried to say that AA-77 had no operable seatback Airfones (yes, I said "Airfones", with an "f", for the spelling police). That was proven to be a lie.
other important [personalities in the 911 truth movement are Richard Gage, Webster Tarpley, Steven Jones, Christopher Bolleyn, David Chandler, William Rodriguez, Kevin Ryan,Dave von Kleist, Barry Zwicker,Howard Zinn,Hunter S Thompson, Charlie Sheen, Rose O'Donnell, Jesse Ventura, Dario Fo, Andreas von Bulow, Francisco Cossiga, Dylan Avery, Alex Jones, David Icke,David Shayler,
and many others
Please note I am not endorsing every single view by these personalities
Respond to this video... The only views I endorse are my own but in general I agree with almost everything DRG says except the fact he does not name names
@falconApoda this is the famous softened steel argument that was alleged to have created the pancake theory that led to the collapse of the buildings.Both buildings collapsed in an identical fashion ( which considering the 'planes' hit on different floors and at different angles is very remarkable
one engineer ( was it Mark Loizeaux? ) said that the collapse was far too symmetric to be the result of an airline impact ( I am paraphrasing)
One thing about the motive... I still can't believe they would do this for US world domination... Always thought if they did it for anything it'd be for oils in Middle East.
It's odd that the intro touts Griffin's Christian faith, because his staunch 9/11 truther stance demonstrates a hateful, suspicious, malevolent view of humanity that's at odds with Christ's teachings.
Griffin has made a lot of money and become an alt-media celebrity selling books pandering to people's suspicion, resentment, and paranoia. Truly, how much less Christian can his message be?
unRompecabezas 1 month ago
that 4 people (or shills) (marked this down is very disturbing
thisisyourwakeup 5 months ago
1) The World Trade Center (WTC) twin towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions.
This is how the collapses may have appeared to non-experts, but demolition experts point out many differences:
• Demolition professionals always blow the bottom floors of a structure first, but the WTC tower collapses began at the upper levels, where the planes hit the buildings.
.america.gov/st/webchat-english/2009/May/20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355.html#ixzz1RCCEXluJ
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup
Come on.....!! There are a kazillion firefighters who said there were multiple explosions in the lobby, basement and other lower floors.
Plenty plenty whitnesses.
Or don't you believe the firemen?
BlatendCrude 8 months ago
@BlatendCrude You dont get it. I know the firememen and witnesses reported explosions and pop pop pop etc. I know this
I just added that link from a US gov website to show how they try to cover things up. Building 7 the 47 story CIA building that collapsed at 5.20pm that evening collapsed in exactly the same way as a controlled demo according to A US GOV website
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew?
How many times did William Rodriguez change his 911 testimony?
If flight 77 was a missile and not a plane, what knocked down the pole lights outside the Pentagon?
ctcole77 7 months ago
@ctcole77 Missile was only what part of the people in 911 truth movement believes. Some of us still think it is a plane. And frankly, I have no idea what happened. I only know that US government didn't tell me the truth. I don't believe what they said. And that's it. Nothing more to it. I don't claim the knowledge of what actually happened. And this movement is about just that. An offical investigation and find out the truth. None of us claims we know the truth, we only know government lied.
Guanchen 4 months ago in playlist Guanchen's favorites
@Guanchen
How did the US govt lie?
Be specific. Give some examples.
ctcole77 4 months ago
@ctcole77 watch the video. They gave 3 offical statements regardling Norad early warning system alone. Each different from one another.
Guanchen 4 months ago
the 'landing gear that somehow got to the roof of 45 Park place , guess what , Building owned by a well known Zionist. Now this site is home for the latest anti Islamic initiative the ground Zero mosque
Yeah Right
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
did you know that Mark Loizeaux of controlled demolition had been in WTC7 two months before????? I wonder if he had popped in for bagels with his friend Larry
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here)
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
as for the fire weakening the steel argument , what we saw was two buildings on fire and then a suddenn instant collapse to the basement
Does that seem like a localised fire weakening some beams ? if that had been the case the building would lean to one side , no the OCT is untrue and against common sense
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
anybody who marks down David Ray Griffin has neither a brain nor a conscoiunce
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup David Ray Griffin is a snakeoil peddler. He is a player in the cottage industry known as 9/11 "truth". He has been discredited several times over by know. He makes a living by telling lies with every keystroke and word he can muster.
You are his unwitting sales rep.
falconApoda 8 months ago
@falconApoda can you name the lies? also its now not know
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thisisyourwakeup "also its now not know"
No, it's "know". I wrote it that way, and there it is.
"can you name the lies?"
Sure. Google "Screw Loose Change" and plug "Griffin" into their search engine. You'll get the phone book. One I remember off the top of my head is when he tried to say that AA-77 had no operable seatback Airfones (yes, I said "Airfones", with an "f", for the spelling police). That was proven to be a lie.
falconApoda 8 months ago
other important [personalities in the 911 truth movement are Richard Gage, Webster Tarpley, Steven Jones, Christopher Bolleyn, David Chandler, William Rodriguez, Kevin Ryan,Dave von Kleist, Barry Zwicker,Howard Zinn,Hunter S Thompson, Charlie Sheen, Rose O'Donnell, Jesse Ventura, Dario Fo, Andreas von Bulow, Francisco Cossiga, Dylan Avery, Alex Jones, David Icke,David Shayler,
and many others
Please note I am not endorsing every single view by these personalities
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup "Please note I am not endorsing every single view by these personalities..."
And that's a good thing, since some of them contradict one another. And some of their "views" are decidedly batshit.
Hilarious. They're all "important" in your mind, yet you don't endorse each and every one of their views.
So what "views" do you endorse? All of them and none of them.
falconApoda 8 months ago
@falconApoda since we are not privy to all the details its impossible for sincere people to be totally sure of every specific
in your cloudy mind this is proof of some weakness but in my opinion to admit that we do not have ALL the facts is a strength.
However everybody brings important elements of research to the table.
Nice try but no cigar
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
Respond to this video... The only views I endorse are my own but in general I agree with almost everything DRG says except the fact he does not name names
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
@thisisyourwakeup "Respond to this video..."
44 minutes into it: The official report does not claim that fire "melted" the steel. This is a strawman construction of Griffin's construction.
There are really too many to name here, given the character limit. Google SLC, or cite an argument by Griffin that you find to be the most compelling.
falconApoda 8 months ago
@falconApoda this is the famous softened steel argument that was alleged to have created the pancake theory that led to the collapse of the buildings.Both buildings collapsed in an identical fashion ( which considering the 'planes' hit on different floors and at different angles is very remarkable
one engineer ( was it Mark Loizeaux? ) said that the collapse was far too symmetric to be the result of an airline impact ( I am paraphrasing)
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
@falconApoda so. whats your thoughts about the occultist clues surrounding 9/11?
zezt 7 months ago
One thing about the motive... I still can't believe they would do this for US world domination... Always thought if they did it for anything it'd be for oils in Middle East.
Guanchen 8 months ago
@Guanchen
motives 1) Israel 2) Insurance fraud 3) Oil grab 4) power 5) Military industrial Complex,
expensive oil is great news for oil companies , extra profits, please see Eisenhower on the Military Industrial Complex
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago
Thank you David. Truth is the finest weapon against Goliath
thisisyourwakeup 8 months ago