If you don't get as much and let a single article that tell you how you think, Then you're batshit fucking stupid. The BBC did wrote an article stating that there was confusion over names and identities. The news finally got the real names of the highjackers who were on the the flights. Well i know your not going to take it and only take the previous story seriously.
You know what, I notice that most truthers are not attractive looking people. They are either fat, too skinny, weird looking or just plain ugly all around. They seem like the types that were the outcast in high school and were looking for a click to connect with in their adult life.
You'd think that people would be too stupid to fall for the 911 "truth" movement but they fall for global warming by the nut-load. So the World Trade Center's destruction was a government plot? OK, the two jet liners were just a creation of the imagination of a million people. Steel doesn't melt? Then how the hell do you cast metal? And the governent also blew up the Pentagon, right? The jetliner was another illusion.
My father had a great catch-all name for these people: stupe-nagles.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
haha libre your a lame ass, i'm still waiting for my video of the plane hitting the pentagon plus a MATCHING engine that came from it. I'm still waiting for you to debunk that 8 of the hijackers are still alive. Your an idiot fuck! haha
@ctcole77 Must add Judy Wood and her latest fiction novel: Where The Towers Went. The story of the DEATH STAR LASER, er "directed energy weapon" and how it destroyed the Twin Towers but...didn't harm a hair on the heads of any of the people at the bases, who were able to run away when collapse began.
Don't forget Alex Jones either, syndicated radio show, 2 websites each with store fronts selling all kinds of kook merchandise.
well that was the biggest piece of pointless unentertaining shit I've ever seen.
Not everyone donates you know, even if everyone did it doesn't follow that these guys are doing this for the sole purpose of making money. You're perpetuating a misconception that you've been bamboozled into believing. You are indeed a sheep.
Pretty ironic coming from someone whos been brainwashed their whole life & doesn't even know it. TV, advertising, suggestive thinking, they got you, chump.
Perfect aye? thanks dude, I thought it was well done, too. I basically copied you, seeing as that was all you had to offer in your rebuttal in the first place, lame-o. & yeah, puzzles kick ass, they stimulate the mind, something that you'll never get to experience with your cmpromised capacity to think for yourself. It's been proven that tv, news & advertising use suggestive thinking & that it works, thats why they do it, & they got you, chump.
alright then, if it's all about the dollar dollar bills thn why is all th info put on the net for free? Wouldn't it be more lucrative to simply charge for eveything?
Arre you serious with that question? Why do they ask for money at all? Like its soo expensive to run a little website and why are many of them outside the US? Dont be a sucker.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Some people wanna order dvd copies of their films, I don't think 10 bucks is that big an ask. Some people may also wanna donate money for the cause, the website directs them to where & how they can do it. If people wanna give their money to them it shouldn't be a problem, you probablt tip waiters & things like that right? Same deal. I wouldn't give them any money but some people want to, whats the big deal about that?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I can see why you'd say that but I don't think it's fair to lump all these guys in with televangelist scumbags, some of them for sure but most aren't as blood sucking. But you at least see where I'm coming from?
If they want to sell stupid crap fine. Asking for donations is a scam. If they are promoting "truth" then why ask for money? I do think televangelists are a perfect example. Like televangelist they know how to manipulate their audience.
YES!!! Everything is going by the master plan!!! Tomorrow we will turn on teh giant lazor beamz in space that will melt the steel, and the same way it melted steel in twin towers and building 7, it will melt the Tin foil caps on the heads of conspiracy nuts, giving them first degree burns!!! MHUAHAHA, Alex Jones won't help you now suckas!!!
The thing about the fall of the buildings is yes they were thousands of tons of steel and concrete so would fall hard. But then they thousands of tons of steel and concrete so we would expect them to be pretty strong. They were holding themselves up. But they stopped doing this so completely that they fell as if they had no strength left at all. The problem you have is that 'Inside Job' is a crazy idea. The events show it to be fact.
You want to know why so many "truthers" as you call them are lonely, mentally ill bored, out of work guys living with their family still? Because they have nothing to lose. Nothing invested in the lie that people who HAVE jobs and mortgages fight so hard to defend.
Society is a state of mind invested in by the unquestioning masses. From a control perspective it's genius. Get the herd to build and defend their own prison.
How many things lock you into the grid hmmm? You're self-made prison...
You mean 'Respectable' people. If 9/11 was an inside job it makes mugs of us all. Who wants to be a mug? The good news is that more and more people are deciding that the conspiricy theory of the world is making more and more sense. I say it's good news because I believe it's the truth. If I am mistaken then it's bad news.
I bet you think the New World Order is purely the domain of nuters too right? Check the news for Obama and Gordon Brown announcing it today and brace your dumb arse for reality to bite you in the ass.
I think you're one of the "twoofers" as you so eloquently put it, trying to discredit genuine scepticism, which is a healthy thing. Healthy in both directions I might add. The official story does not make any sense to anyone informed on the matter.
You say in your channel you are here on youtube to just attack people you don't like, yet everything you say is about 911. You're here on youtube every single day fighting for the official line.
Not very good though. You're repetitive and childish.
I'm no conspiracy nut, but as you are a self proclaimed debunker of pretty much everything, let me ask you this LIBREPUB... If the FBI took every single security tape that showed the plane hitting the pentagon, (and they said they did, not some nutter) why hasn't the impact been played on TV over and over again like the twin tower impacts?
But doesn't that strike you as just a little bit fishy? if not then you simply have a low IQ and it isn't your fault or you are a coward scared to face reality.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
calling truther twoofer is retarded and childish;believing the word of a government with such obvious agendas is just plain stupid /and satire actually has to be funny
Believing the shit you believe is retarded and childish;believing the word of a group of people with such stupid agendas is just plain stupid /and you are funny.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This moron calls those in the 9/11 truth movement sheep, but the beginning of the video reads, "an NWO Illuminati production" and is funded by FEMA.
With shepherds like that, who's the sheep?
And the various factions within the Illuminati, who this drone admittedly follows (hence the term 'sheep') are the biggest beggers of financial "contributions."
On another note, the author is following a known terrorist organisation (Illuminati) and is, therefore, a terrorist.
When will you sad little drones wake up? Your beloved government rapes you daily and you thank them for it. Why do you refuse to acknowledge the truth that they surround you with? They throw it in your awckward little faces and you deny, acting like you don't see it.
Drop your fears and wake up! All it takes is an opened mind and a little common sense, though unfortunates like you are so lacking.
1:11....I swear to God that if I find any of those fucktards there the next time I go downtown (on the National Mall), that I will do my very best to ensure that at least one of them ends up in one of those reflecting pools...
Do you remember they found a couple of terrorists pasports in the street below the towers after the planes hit? I heard that first on the news, not infowars.
I think I have showed you a lot of stuff to be getting on with. No it's us Truthers that can't decide if it was a plane or a missile. The government has always said it was a plane. I feel it was a missile since a plane would have left wing and engine holes. If you want to see something then look at the bit of Loose Change FC where they show how the plane should have left wing holes. Small bit's of scrap plane don't explain the lack of engines. Government says engines vaporized, happy with that?
You havent shown me shit. You claim there is some great contradiction, bit cant show it.
Loose Change is a freaking joke man! You honestly telling me fuxing dropouts and failed pizza drivers are your expert sources in metalurgy, physics, construction and aviation?
oilempire*us/bogus*html
Look at the pics yourself. There was wing damage to the pentagon, and its 100% consistent with the aircraft.
Fux dude! Loose change? Dylan Avery? THATS ur source? u cant be fuxing serious!
You don't have to like Dylan Avery as a person to be impressed by the documentry. There are serious points for further investigation but enough evidence to show it was an inside job. The plane that crashed into a field made a smaller dent in the ground than a fighter plane I saw crash at an airshow.
1) Witness staements often contain inconsistencies. Especially in Air Crashes.
2) Not even sure that it is inconsistent, as the wings hit the building, and the fuselage punches it, youre going to get some aft flex before the wing tanks ruputre and fuel explodes.
1) THATS made up. What he said was "I saw this jet...and American Airline jet. It was like....it was like a cruise missle with wings..."
Thats a simile.
2) Again, a witness statements are often inconsistent in air crashes. So, the fact that a witness ays something that isnt 100% exact (especially given the split-second, traumatic nature of the event) is expected. Not at all an indication of anything sinister.
Point 1, that's right, like a cruise missle, not actually one.
Point 2 I am refering to the 9/11 Remembered which is at least a year after the event. He is addressing the isssue of why the hole seemed too small. The eye movements I am refering to indicate an imagined event rather than a remembered one. If what actually happend was the wings smashed wing holes in the pentagon then why would he say they folded? I am looking at this from all angles, not just the CTs or official explaination.
I especially like the part where they show the plane launch a missile before it hits lol. Come on its time to give it up, you had a good run, but the story makes no sense. Go to a steel foundry, and you will see fire melting steel. Aluminum melts at an even lower temperature. The steel didnt have to melt, it had thousands of tons of weight on top of it, and support beams were broken by the plane. I thought it was going down from the structural damage alone.
I don't remember a bit were the plane launches a missile. There is a bit of the first plane hitting that looks like an explosion in the building before the plane hits.
They may have removed that part from the new movie, but its been a while since I saw the movie. They claimed that it was a military plane with a pod on the bottom that launched a missle right before it hit. I dont know if its been removed from the "iron clad" theory that they are using today. There was no explosion before the plane hit. Can you imagine the timing that would require.
There are lots of detailss to be picked at and no perfect explaination. However a lump of concrete tossed off the top of a 400 metre tall twin tower would not turn to baby powder when it hit the concrete below. If you dropped the top section above the plane hit then it would not pulverise to baby powder. Yet it fell through all the other floors and kept on falling even when it was just fine dust. You can see how the speed of distruction is actually falling as fast as the ejected debry.
what kind of force was put on that piece of concrete to shoot it out? I dont know the design, but if most of the load is on the steel, and the steel failed due to its loss of strength, then the concrete was overloaded with forces that it was not designed to carry, it has to fail. It is possible that the concrete was overloaded and destroyed in the building before it hit the ground. that would explain the shooting out of concrete at the levels as you go down, the weight, plus the air pressure.
Weight plus air pressure? Yes I agree that the concrete was distroyed before it hit the ground. Remember the concrete is able to hold the whole building up for years. You can clearly see that the distruction starts near the plane impact and travels downwards at the speed of something falling through air. You can see how energetic the distruction is. Is the weight of the building driving the building to tear itself apart? Turning to dust and throwing out massive chunks of steel and concreate?
No, thats where you go wrong. The concrete and steel system held up the building. Once the steel was weakened, then the system failed. The concrete was designed to hold up its part. When it inherited the weight that the steel was holding it failed. Then you have things moving out of place and unbalanced forces. The air pressure is from the air trapped inside the building that had to excape. Send me an email, if you still want to discuss this, this is my last post on here.
Good point. There is a lack of official info on the Pentagon. A lack of video evidence. I think we are agreed that all CCTV tapes were collected but never released. There is an eye witness who says he saw the wings fold back, I think he is lieing but many debunkers of Loose Change believe him. The evidence you put to me says the plane crashed without the wings folding back. Although I am having a hard time seeing the wing holes.
Although I am having a hard time seeing the wing holes. ""
But what you also saw, without a doubt, is that Dylan Avery lied in Loose Change. Its not just one, 18 foot hole. Thwe damage all along the first floor is consistent to a 757 hitting the pentagon.
Loose Change intentionally lied to you, ignored the wing damage on the 1st floor, and lined up their outline of the plane, as if the plane hit the 3rd floor--no wing damage on the 3rd floor.
Edgeman, Still you do not address the passports in the street. You just brush it off as irrelivant, does this mean you are aware that they found passports in the street?
I don't want to have to do the thinking for you but since you insist. We saw how the 2nd plane hit the tower in a huge fireball which burst through the other side. We can deduce the 1st plane did a similar thing. Yet the hijackers passports flew from their pockets and landed undamaged in the street below. Do you agree with that or do you have an explaination?
Some personal effects survive almost every crash of a plane. Fro example, Lisa Frost (from UA175) mileage plus card was also found. Some of the US Mail that was on the planes was recovered as well.
Some personal effects survive evert crash. Even PSA 1771 that slammed in at over 700 mph.
Nothing to explain. Anyone even slightly educated in the issue of airline crashes knows there is nothing unusual in finding some personal effects.
Agreed that this can and does happen. Most of the items would have been lost. It stretches credibility to say that the hijackers passports were the ones that escaped. At the time I just assumed it was a white lie used as shorthand for "we know who the hijackers were because...". What do you think?
Well it shouldnt stretch the credibility. The hijackers, being in the cockpit or (as reported by phone calls) were forward, near the cockpit.
As the plane hits the building, breaks apart and the fuel explodes, the forward fuselage would have momentum and still travel forward away from the explosion, before the explosion hit it. The aft fuselage would carry forward right INTO the explosion.
So the cockpit and 1st class cabin area would be the most likely area to find personal items from.
It's a possibility. It says a lot about you that you are prepared to accept that they found passports. I thought my explaination that it was made up was more likely. Why would the spooks want to reveil their methods, they just wanted the message to go out that they had identified some of terrorists. If they had been tracking them for ages then questions would have been asked as to why the attack was not prevented.
It says a lot about you that you are prepared to accept that they found passports.""
Again, why would it be made up? Its normal and expected to find some personal effects.
Thats the point skippy. It really was a terrorist attack, and all the little things that dont make sense to twoofers are ONLY because they never took the time to do the research and become informed on the reality of the events.
I have explained that they would make this up so they don't have to explain in complex detail how they have been tracking the terrorists from before the attack.
Remember this struck me at the time, years before I became a twoofer. You don't need to believe this particular white lie to accept the official version, you can read between the lines. However it's also consistant with the conspiricy theory and a larger body of lies that we say were told.
You must have done quite a bit or research to come up with all those images. Did you come across anything that you had to check out in depth? For instance why the plane was allowed to hit the Pentagon and not shot down?
I believe it was a missile because the evidence shows that wings did not hit the Pentagon. There is a witness who says that the wings did not hit the pentagon, he says they folded back when the nose hit. Now that thinking could damage brain cells.
Good video. These Truthers tell us it's an inside job but don't do SHIT to prosicute the criminals. They then create all kinds of excuse and ask you for money in donations so they live off of their supporters.
I thought I replied to this before. Yes it's probably true about the beard and the pony tails. That's not an argument against what they are saying. Infact those sorts of discussions are few and far between on here. However someone did raise a good point about the missile/plane thing in response to me, but I can't find it.
Yes, it feels a bot like being an electric monk (Douglas Adams reference), believing many contradictory things at the same time. Most people don't know enough about 9/11 to have any problems. However the more you learn, the more things that can't all be true. The official story, when you include everything, contradicts itself.;
Damn, I knew that Darth faked his death and Luke was in on it. The body that was burned inside Darths suit was really Greedo. The Tattoine police records show no burial of his body after Han shot him in the cantina. He just "disappeared" . Yeah right, the apple doesnt fall far from the tree LUKE!!! Why are you wearing black in Jedi??? This whole thing stinks of NWO (new Wookie order) . Also, Yoda is a Jew and is Shel Silverman's uncle. Thanks for helping expose this vile conspiracy!
Two words to debunk twoofers; Alex Jones
krishnalite 3 months ago
Gosh, nobody sends me money, just encouragement. Alex is media - I don't need to know anything else.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN9IIFakes
Thats cuz your a CunT !!
SkuIICrusherGhost 3 months ago
All glory to the NWO! :)
VictorRovial 1 year ago
ontime34
If you don't get as much and let a single article that tell you how you think, Then you're batshit fucking stupid. The BBC did wrote an article stating that there was confusion over names and identities. The news finally got the real names of the highjackers who were on the the flights. Well i know your not going to take it and only take the previous story seriously.
warlord2080 1 year ago 2
You know what, I notice that most truthers are not attractive looking people. They are either fat, too skinny, weird looking or just plain ugly all around. They seem like the types that were the outcast in high school and were looking for a click to connect with in their adult life.
ThePandems 2 years ago 9
You'd think that people would be too stupid to fall for the 911 "truth" movement but they fall for global warming by the nut-load. So the World Trade Center's destruction was a government plot? OK, the two jet liners were just a creation of the imagination of a million people. Steel doesn't melt? Then how the hell do you cast metal? And the governent also blew up the Pentagon, right? The jetliner was another illusion.
My father had a great catch-all name for these people: stupe-nagles.
Liberty9m 2 years ago 6
I can think of a better video of yours to upload! :)
chayaus 2 years ago
:P :P
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Hehehehe
chayaus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha libre your a lame ass, i'm still waiting for my video of the plane hitting the pentagon plus a MATCHING engine that came from it. I'm still waiting for you to debunk that 8 of the hijackers are still alive. Your an idiot fuck! haha
ontime34 2 years ago
TOP 5 MOST FAMOUS 911 TWOOFERS
Jared Lee Loughner - Murdered 6 people in Tucson
James von Brunn - Murdered a security guard at the Holocaust Museum
Luke Rudkowski – Stole 20,000 dollars from WeAreChange to pay his college tuition
Richard Gage - 75,000 dollar salary + expenses from A&EFor911LIES
David Ray Griffin – 50 dollars per ticket, 500 per conference, 20 conferences = 500,000 dollars per year
ctcole77 11 months ago 3
@ctcole77 Must add Judy Wood and her latest fiction novel: Where The Towers Went. The story of the DEATH STAR LASER, er "directed energy weapon" and how it destroyed the Twin Towers but...didn't harm a hair on the heads of any of the people at the bases, who were able to run away when collapse began.
Don't forget Alex Jones either, syndicated radio show, 2 websites each with store fronts selling all kinds of kook merchandise.
Oz1976 9 months ago 4
those sheep probably didn't appreciate being compared to twoofers
nons420 2 years ago 16
LULZ
nagasama75 2 years ago 2
well that was the biggest piece of pointless unentertaining shit I've ever seen.
Not everyone donates you know, even if everyone did it doesn't follow that these guys are doing this for the sole purpose of making money. You're perpetuating a misconception that you've been bamboozled into believing. You are indeed a sheep.
bukkake2007 2 years ago
The NWO thanks you for your opinion, now go back to your life as a brainwashed jackass.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Pretty ironic coming from someone whos been brainwashed their whole life & doesn't even know it. TV, advertising, suggestive thinking, they got you, chump.
bukkake2007 2 years ago
OK nutbag, just go watch The Matrix and V For Vendetta and everything will be ok. Irony, haha. Now that is funny sheep. Pat on the head little boy.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Nutbag aye? Oooo, ouch, my poor feelings. & yeah, you calling me a sheep or brainwashed is very ironic, you're an ignoramus.
bukkake2007 2 years ago
Perfect with your "I know you are, but what am I?" defense. Typical boring little truther, have fun in the puzzle factory.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Perfect aye? thanks dude, I thought it was well done, too. I basically copied you, seeing as that was all you had to offer in your rebuttal in the first place, lame-o. & yeah, puzzles kick ass, they stimulate the mind, something that you'll never get to experience with your cmpromised capacity to think for yourself. It's been proven that tv, news & advertising use suggestive thinking & that it works, thats why they do it, & they got you, chump.
bukkake2007 2 years ago
I know you are, but what am I? X10
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
yeah, good comeback, way to prove it's all about money.
bukkake2007 2 years ago
Thanks, I'm glad you agree.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
alright then, if it's all about the dollar dollar bills thn why is all th info put on the net for free? Wouldn't it be more lucrative to simply charge for eveything?
bukkake2007 2 years ago
Arre you serious with that question? Why do they ask for money at all? Like its soo expensive to run a little website and why are many of them outside the US? Dont be a sucker.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Some people wanna order dvd copies of their films, I don't think 10 bucks is that big an ask. Some people may also wanna donate money for the cause, the website directs them to where & how they can do it. If people wanna give their money to them it shouldn't be a problem, you probablt tip waiters & things like that right? Same deal. I wouldn't give them any money but some people want to, whats the big deal about that?
bukkake2007 2 years ago
Waiters? That an awful comparison. Televangelist would be a better example.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I can see why you'd say that but I don't think it's fair to lump all these guys in with televangelist scumbags, some of them for sure but most aren't as blood sucking. But you at least see where I'm coming from?
bukkake2007 2 years ago
If they want to sell stupid crap fine. Asking for donations is a scam. If they are promoting "truth" then why ask for money? I do think televangelists are a perfect example. Like televangelist they know how to manipulate their audience.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
YES!!! Everything is going by the master plan!!! Tomorrow we will turn on teh giant lazor beamz in space that will melt the steel, and the same way it melted steel in twin towers and building 7, it will melt the Tin foil caps on the heads of conspiracy nuts, giving them first degree burns!!! MHUAHAHA, Alex Jones won't help you now suckas!!!
Annu1tco3pt1s 2 years ago 15
what's the music?
JJarv213 2 years ago
mussorsky- pictures at an exhibition-(closing)
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
lol i love your beginnings :P
AwsomestKill 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow more useless disinformation, thanks!
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
PainInDaBrain 2 years ago
Follow the money
PeakOil13 2 years ago
Fools die fools deaths.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
The you should be very careful..DING!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
The thing about the fall of the buildings is yes they were thousands of tons of steel and concrete so would fall hard. But then they thousands of tons of steel and concrete so we would expect them to be pretty strong. They were holding themselves up. But they stopped doing this so completely that they fell as if they had no strength left at all. The problem you have is that 'Inside Job' is a crazy idea. The events show it to be fact.
RavenPrecept 2 years ago
Truth hurts doesn't it... that's why you need to be an adult to face things. Be a man.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
I will be man enough to say I'm glad you can admit you need medication. Your mom and I are proud. MEAT!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
You want to know why so many "truthers" as you call them are lonely, mentally ill bored, out of work guys living with their family still? Because they have nothing to lose. Nothing invested in the lie that people who HAVE jobs and mortgages fight so hard to defend.
Society is a state of mind invested in by the unquestioning masses. From a control perspective it's genius. Get the herd to build and defend their own prison.
How many things lock you into the grid hmmm? You're self-made prison...
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Shut up meat and take some medication.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Someday soon, we'll break free. You just wait. We'll all live in our parents basements. Viva la Revolución!
optiuum67 2 years ago 2
You mean 'Respectable' people. If 9/11 was an inside job it makes mugs of us all. Who wants to be a mug? The good news is that more and more people are deciding that the conspiricy theory of the world is making more and more sense. I say it's good news because I believe it's the truth. If I am mistaken then it's bad news.
RavenPrecept 2 years ago
You're in the same boat as us dickhead... and we hate you.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
DING!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Aww the truthers don't like it when other people call them sheep? Go buy a t-shirt about it.
optiuum67 2 years ago 2
*nutters
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
DING!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
I bet you think the New World Order is purely the domain of nuters too right? Check the news for Obama and Gordon Brown announcing it today and brace your dumb arse for reality to bite you in the ass.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
DING! All hail the NWO!!!!!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
I think you're one of the "twoofers" as you so eloquently put it, trying to discredit genuine scepticism, which is a healthy thing. Healthy in both directions I might add. The official story does not make any sense to anyone informed on the matter.
You say in your channel you are here on youtube to just attack people you don't like, yet everything you say is about 911. You're here on youtube every single day fighting for the official line.
Not very good though. You're repetitive and childish.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
DING! You act like I make the rules. So funny.....DING! DING! DING! No biscuit meat....
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
What rules?
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
You made a video about an extremely serious subject and refuse to answer a simple question about the subject in question.
I know who Pavlov was, but I fail to see the relevance here. Is there any reason you keep saying meat or is it like tourette syndrome?
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Man, you just keep coming... DING!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Sorry...MEAT! I forgot.....
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Have you got a diagnosed mental problem?
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
DING! No treat, get a towel!
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
I think most people who chant stuff like 911 inside job are as stupid as people like you LIBREPUB.
I think for myself and you're way to scared to do that.
Unlucky, meat boy.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Oh wow, that really hurts. DING! No treat this time, so you just have to sit there and salivate meat.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
I kind of figured the whole thing was a scam. Great satire video
Nefyst 2 years ago 3
Answer my question LIBREPUB. The answer is very simple and obvious... to most people at least.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
You are like Pavlovs dog. DING! Answer this question meat. Why are you such a sissy?
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
How does Ward Churchill fit into that?
O_o
coffeebeaner 2 years ago
I just thought he looked like that crazy sheep and he's an a-hole. Thats it really.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Oh. I actually think he's pretty cool, but most 9/11 Truthers don't want to hear that.
coffeebeaner 2 years ago
Thats cool
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
What does meat mean? Do you often insert random words into your speech? That's a pretty debilitating illness you have there.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
You know what the sausage that means.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
You just lost what tiny credibility you once had. Have fun you strange little man.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
That the cheese talking I think. Try harder meat.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
Stop calling me strange names and answer my original question please.
It's a very basic question, which you refuse to answer. Why is that?
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Because you are a douche bag.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm no conspiracy nut, but as you are a self proclaimed debunker of pretty much everything, let me ask you this LIBREPUB... If the FBI took every single security tape that showed the plane hitting the pentagon, (and they said they did, not some nutter) why hasn't the impact been played on TV over and over again like the twin tower impacts?
Give me a decent explanation.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Because you are a conspiracy nut. I don't debate, just debase. Take it somewhere else loser.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
But doesn't that strike you as just a little bit fishy? if not then you simply have a low IQ and it isn't your fault or you are a coward scared to face reality.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
No, that makes you a liar. Now if you don't mind I have a meeting with MOSSAD. Find some medication and the voices will go away.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
What are you talking about? Mossad? You mean the mossad, Israeli intellligence? Strange boy.
What voices? I don't hear voices thank you.
It was a simple question and you instantly resorted to silliness. That speaks volumes about you as a person.
Coward.
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Nice to see you got a new channel. haha.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
New channel? What does that mean? Do you feel OK?
Oh wait you think I'm someone else. Riiiight. you're so important people follow you right? LMFAO OKAY FT!
MrMcGreggorsGarden 2 years ago
Oh boo hoo you hurt my feelings meat.
LIBREPUB 2 years ago
I like the song!
gur1337 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
calling truther twoofer is retarded and childish;believing the word of a government with such obvious agendas is just plain stupid /and satire actually has to be funny
vendetta1066 3 years ago
Shut up retard!!!!
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Believing the shit you believe is retarded and childish;believing the word of a group of people with such stupid agendas is just plain stupid /and you are funny.
Thunderr10 3 years ago
Glad I could make you laugh! Now back to the FEMA camp! FREEDOM!!!!!!!
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Oh that was for vendetta. haha...its Monday..... I like your channel pic.
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
haha no worries.... fear the gun monkey!
Thunderr10 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This moron calls those in the 9/11 truth movement sheep, but the beginning of the video reads, "an NWO Illuminati production" and is funded by FEMA.
With shepherds like that, who's the sheep?
And the various factions within the Illuminati, who this drone admittedly follows (hence the term 'sheep') are the biggest beggers of financial "contributions."
On another note, the author is following a known terrorist organisation (Illuminati) and is, therefore, a terrorist.
ShepherdSlayer 3 years ago
It's called satire retard. Thank you for proving my point. You guys are great at doing that. Now get back under your bed and everything will be ok.
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
When will you sad little drones wake up? Your beloved government rapes you daily and you thank them for it. Why do you refuse to acknowledge the truth that they surround you with? They throw it in your awckward little faces and you deny, acting like you don't see it.
Drop your fears and wake up! All it takes is an opened mind and a little common sense, though unfortunates like you are so lacking.
ShepherdSlayer 2 years ago
sheep.
AssaultKalashnikov 2 years ago 4
Its always hilarious. They tell you how huge the movement is. And every time they rally, its 4 people.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
Well there are only 2 types of truthers. The scamers and the scammed. The latter are the suckers holding signs.
femacamps4ever 3 years ago 3
1:11....I swear to God that if I find any of those fucktards there the next time I go downtown (on the National Mall), that I will do my very best to ensure that at least one of them ends up in one of those reflecting pools...
GooseGrl172 3 years ago 5
That would be a good start. Thanks for the view.
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
You go girl!
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
More Disinfo coming from a person who hasn't spent enough time researching on their own.
TaintedUS 3 years ago
Sorry, but switching between prisonplanet and inforwars is not research.
People who HAVE done the research know twoofers are nuttier than squirrel shit.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 4
Do you remember they found a couple of terrorists pasports in the street below the towers after the planes hit? I heard that first on the news, not infowars.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
So what?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
youre still not showing me any big contradiction where the Govt ever claimed a missle hit the pentagon.
So, where is that great, big contradiction?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
I think I have showed you a lot of stuff to be getting on with. No it's us Truthers that can't decide if it was a plane or a missile. The government has always said it was a plane. I feel it was a missile since a plane would have left wing and engine holes. If you want to see something then look at the bit of Loose Change FC where they show how the plane should have left wing holes. Small bit's of scrap plane don't explain the lack of engines. Government says engines vaporized, happy with that?
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
You havent shown me shit. You claim there is some great contradiction, bit cant show it.
Loose Change is a freaking joke man! You honestly telling me fuxing dropouts and failed pizza drivers are your expert sources in metalurgy, physics, construction and aviation?
oilempire*us/bogus*html
Look at the pics yourself. There was wing damage to the pentagon, and its 100% consistent with the aircraft.
Fux dude! Loose change? Dylan Avery? THATS ur source? u cant be fuxing serious!
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
Loose Change edgeman, yikes!!
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
You don't have to like Dylan Avery as a person to be impressed by the documentry. There are serious points for further investigation but enough evidence to show it was an inside job. The plane that crashed into a field made a smaller dent in the ground than a fighter plane I saw crash at an airshow.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
""You don't have to like Dylan Avery as a person to be impressed by the documentry. ""
True, But you do have to be a moron to be impressed by it, or to be fooled by it.
Anyone familiar with the sciences, the scientific methods, analysis, views it as a comedy.
Its cheap and obvious agit-prop. Mountains of speculation, guesses and unfounded assumptions. And some lies (in the case of "vaporised airplanes"
Then after compiling a mountain of speculation, guesses, lies and unfounded
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
cont...assumptions its absurd to then claim something is proved.
If that were a High school research project, it would fail.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
A little light entertainment ;-)
watch?v=S1QFfS-FlXA
But seriously here is Mike Walters explaining what he saw that day. From1.50 he explains how the wings folded back.
watch?v=f0vxc50xAbk
Is this consistant with the damage you are saying is evident in the pentagon photos?
You might also want to look up what all those sideways eye movements mean.
Do you think Mike might be trying to make the CT's look good?
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
1) Witness staements often contain inconsistencies. Especially in Air Crashes.
2) Not even sure that it is inconsistent, as the wings hit the building, and the fuselage punches it, youre going to get some aft flex before the wing tanks ruputre and fuel explodes.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
1. Agreed, there is one point in another interview where Mike says it was a cruise missile.
2. and the wings get drawn into the building through the hole that Mike says is smaller than you would expect.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
1) THATS made up. What he said was "I saw this jet...and American Airline jet. It was like....it was like a cruise missle with wings..."
Thats a simile.
2) Again, a witness statements are often inconsistent in air crashes. So, the fact that a witness ays something that isnt 100% exact (especially given the split-second, traumatic nature of the event) is expected. Not at all an indication of anything sinister.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
Point 1, that's right, like a cruise missle, not actually one.
Point 2 I am refering to the 9/11 Remembered which is at least a year after the event. He is addressing the isssue of why the hole seemed too small. The eye movements I am refering to indicate an imagined event rather than a remembered one. If what actually happend was the wings smashed wing holes in the pentagon then why would he say they folded? I am looking at this from all angles, not just the CTs or official explaination.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
""eye movements I am refering to indicate an imagined event rather than a remembered one.""
you want to play Amatuer psychiatrist, go for it.
But, in the end there isnt one smallest shred of evidence to support an inside job. Mike Walters eye movements nothwithstanding.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Scholars for 911 Truth split into two groups?
How can Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth be considered a professional organization when 80% of its members are students?
Why are there NO professional/academic peer reviewed journals or papers substantiating 911 truther theories?
911morontwoofer 3 years ago 4
I especially like the part where they show the plane launch a missile before it hits lol. Come on its time to give it up, you had a good run, but the story makes no sense. Go to a steel foundry, and you will see fire melting steel. Aluminum melts at an even lower temperature. The steel didnt have to melt, it had thousands of tons of weight on top of it, and support beams were broken by the plane. I thought it was going down from the structural damage alone.
thedudeabides76 2 years ago
I don't remember a bit were the plane launches a missile. There is a bit of the first plane hitting that looks like an explosion in the building before the plane hits.
RavenPrecept 2 years ago
They may have removed that part from the new movie, but its been a while since I saw the movie. They claimed that it was a military plane with a pod on the bottom that launched a missle right before it hit. I dont know if its been removed from the "iron clad" theory that they are using today. There was no explosion before the plane hit. Can you imagine the timing that would require.
thedudeabides76 2 years ago 2
There are lots of detailss to be picked at and no perfect explaination. However a lump of concrete tossed off the top of a 400 metre tall twin tower would not turn to baby powder when it hit the concrete below. If you dropped the top section above the plane hit then it would not pulverise to baby powder. Yet it fell through all the other floors and kept on falling even when it was just fine dust. You can see how the speed of distruction is actually falling as fast as the ejected debry.
RavenPrecept 2 years ago
what kind of force was put on that piece of concrete to shoot it out? I dont know the design, but if most of the load is on the steel, and the steel failed due to its loss of strength, then the concrete was overloaded with forces that it was not designed to carry, it has to fail. It is possible that the concrete was overloaded and destroyed in the building before it hit the ground. that would explain the shooting out of concrete at the levels as you go down, the weight, plus the air pressure.
thedudeabides76 2 years ago 2
Weight plus air pressure? Yes I agree that the concrete was distroyed before it hit the ground. Remember the concrete is able to hold the whole building up for years. You can clearly see that the distruction starts near the plane impact and travels downwards at the speed of something falling through air. You can see how energetic the distruction is. Is the weight of the building driving the building to tear itself apart? Turning to dust and throwing out massive chunks of steel and concreate?
RavenPrecept 2 years ago
No, thats where you go wrong. The concrete and steel system held up the building. Once the steel was weakened, then the system failed. The concrete was designed to hold up its part. When it inherited the weight that the steel was holding it failed. Then you have things moving out of place and unbalanced forces. The air pressure is from the air trapped inside the building that had to excape. Send me an email, if you still want to discuss this, this is my last post on here.
thedudeabides76 2 years ago 3
Government says engines vaporized, happy with that? ""
No, Dylan Avery says the govt says the engines vaporised. Ive never heard anyone besides Dylan claim that.
You happy being lied-to and used by Dylan Avery?
You happy knowing you put all your eggs in the "basket" of a drop-out and failed pizza driver as your expert on all the relevent sciences?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Good point. There is a lack of official info on the Pentagon. A lack of video evidence. I think we are agreed that all CCTV tapes were collected but never released. There is an eye witness who says he saw the wings fold back, I think he is lieing but many debunkers of Loose Change believe him. The evidence you put to me says the plane crashed without the wings folding back. Although I am having a hard time seeing the wing holes.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Although I am having a hard time seeing the wing holes. ""
But what you also saw, without a doubt, is that Dylan Avery lied in Loose Change. Its not just one, 18 foot hole. Thwe damage all along the first floor is consistent to a 757 hitting the pentagon.
Loose Change intentionally lied to you, ignored the wing damage on the 1st floor, and lined up their outline of the plane, as if the plane hit the 3rd floor--no wing damage on the 3rd floor.
U happy being lied-to?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
No I have been stairing at the photos and I can't see wing holes. You even quoted me. I am not seeing what you are seeing.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
No, use the website. Click into the pentagon section, the even outline the damage from the wings.
Even you cant miss it.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Edgeman, no response to this? I remember at the time it was a breakthrough because they learned who two of the terrorists were.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
And again...so what? Whats the point?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Edgeman, Still you do not address the passports in the street. You just brush it off as irrelivant, does this mean you are aware that they found passports in the street?
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
You still havent given me anything to address. They found a passport? So what?
WHAT IS THE POINT THAT YOU WANT ADDRESSED??????????????
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
I don't want to have to do the thinking for you but since you insist. We saw how the 2nd plane hit the tower in a huge fireball which burst through the other side. We can deduce the 1st plane did a similar thing. Yet the hijackers passports flew from their pockets and landed undamaged in the street below. Do you agree with that or do you have an explaination?
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Some personal effects survive almost every crash of a plane. Fro example, Lisa Frost (from UA175) mileage plus card was also found. Some of the US Mail that was on the planes was recovered as well.
Some personal effects survive evert crash. Even PSA 1771 that slammed in at over 700 mph.
Nothing to explain. Anyone even slightly educated in the issue of airline crashes knows there is nothing unusual in finding some personal effects.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Agreed that this can and does happen. Most of the items would have been lost. It stretches credibility to say that the hijackers passports were the ones that escaped. At the time I just assumed it was a white lie used as shorthand for "we know who the hijackers were because...". What do you think?
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Well it shouldnt stretch the credibility. The hijackers, being in the cockpit or (as reported by phone calls) were forward, near the cockpit.
As the plane hits the building, breaks apart and the fuel explodes, the forward fuselage would have momentum and still travel forward away from the explosion, before the explosion hit it. The aft fuselage would carry forward right INTO the explosion.
So the cockpit and 1st class cabin area would be the most likely area to find personal items from.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
It's a possibility. It says a lot about you that you are prepared to accept that they found passports. I thought my explaination that it was made up was more likely. Why would the spooks want to reveil their methods, they just wanted the message to go out that they had identified some of terrorists. If they had been tracking them for ages then questions would have been asked as to why the attack was not prevented.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
It says a lot about you that you are prepared to accept that they found passports.""
Again, why would it be made up? Its normal and expected to find some personal effects.
Thats the point skippy. It really was a terrorist attack, and all the little things that dont make sense to twoofers are ONLY because they never took the time to do the research and become informed on the reality of the events.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
OK, sorry about the personal attack.
I have explained that they would make this up so they don't have to explain in complex detail how they have been tracking the terrorists from before the attack.
Remember this struck me at the time, years before I became a twoofer. You don't need to believe this particular white lie to accept the official version, you can read between the lines. However it's also consistant with the conspiricy theory and a larger body of lies that we say were told.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Problem is that the "larger body of lies" are from the twoofer movement.
Like the mike wallace cruise missle lie.
Regarding 911, the entire pattern of lies is not discovered by the truth movement, its told by them.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
No this is just generalising and slandering. You know Mike said cruise missile. In my opinion he does look like he is lying.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Nope, he didnt say it was a cruise missle. I quoted it before.
Its not a slander, its a fact. A systematic pattern on intentional lies come from the truth movement. Not discovered by them
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
You must have done quite a bit or research to come up with all those images. Did you come across anything that you had to check out in depth? For instance why the plane was allowed to hit the Pentagon and not shot down?
PS. Some of the lamb pictures were very cute.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Fun. They did it for fun. Also, They wanted to make Youtube more sucessful.
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Fun possibly, but they would be unusual in thinking that is fun.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
I thought it was a missle that hit the pentagon.
Do you think twoofers will ever get together and decide on a single story?
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
I believe it was a missile because the evidence shows that wings did not hit the Pentagon. There is a witness who says that the wings did not hit the pentagon, he says they folded back when the nose hit. Now that thinking could damage brain cells.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
""I believe it was a missile because...""
1) Belief is not fact. Not even close to it.
2) If a missle hit the pentagon, why do you guys say Cheney ordered a stand down so 77 could hit the pentagon?
THAT contradcition alone is 100x and prohibitive as any you can claim the govt story makes.
Sorry, but if contradiction is the fatal flaw, the twoofer movement was dead before it started.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 3
Good video. These Truthers tell us it's an inside job but don't do SHIT to prosicute the criminals. They then create all kinds of excuse and ask you for money in donations so they live off of their supporters.
Secretvideo09 3 years ago
Truthing is a dangerous hobby. Odd things happen which kill you.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Truthing is a dangerous hobby? Dangerous to brain cells maybe.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 4
Yeah, and did you notice that most truthers have bugged out, crazy eyes, pube beards and pony tails? Not exactly NASA material...
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Very funny and quite possibly true. However that's not really addressing the points that truthers make.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
I thought I replied to this before. Yes it's probably true about the beard and the pony tails. That's not an argument against what they are saying. Infact those sorts of discussions are few and far between on here. However someone did raise a good point about the missile/plane thing in response to me, but I can't find it.
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
Yes, it feels a bot like being an electric monk (Douglas Adams reference), believing many contradictory things at the same time. Most people don't know enough about 9/11 to have any problems. However the more you learn, the more things that can't all be true. The official story, when you include everything, contradicts itself.;
RavenPrecept 3 years ago
The official story, when you include everything, contradicts itself.; ""
Really? What is it in the official story contradicts that 77 hit the pentagon, for example.
Where does the official story say 77 didnt hit the pentagon.
::making popcorn:::
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are a pathetic pile of shit!!
AiresQX4 3 years ago
Baaaaaa! Baaaaaa! hahaha
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
ONLY I KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON 911!
I AM THE ONLY TRUE 911 TRUTHER!
It was Darth Vader!
Lord Vader and Bush secretly destroyed the moon and built a third deathstar in its place.
Vader used the main gun on the deathstar to commit 911.
Afterward he smoked a joint!
911morontwoofer 3 years ago 7
Damn, I knew that Darth faked his death and Luke was in on it. The body that was burned inside Darths suit was really Greedo. The Tattoine police records show no burial of his body after Han shot him in the cantina. He just "disappeared" . Yeah right, the apple doesnt fall far from the tree LUKE!!! Why are you wearing black in Jedi??? This whole thing stinks of NWO (new Wookie order) . Also, Yoda is a Jew and is Shel Silverman's uncle. Thanks for helping expose this vile conspiracy!
LIBREPUB 3 years ago
Fema Camps for Freedom. HA! HA! Nice!
krayzewolf 3 years ago 3
I crack myself up sometimes too. Thanks for the view!
LIBREPUB 3 years ago