Recently according to the Guardian, the BBC is now funded by US Sate Dept, its no surprise the quality of news and impartiality is pretty obvious with half a brain
You could say the BBC is the propaganda arm for the city of london international bankers who are responsible for 90% of strife in the world today. They control Drugs and Terrorism globally. The world would be a much better place if we eliminate this international banker menace out of the City of London.The BBC is especially disgraceful for their open support for the Narco-Terrorists the LTTE. The worst terrorists in the world a group the BBC propaganda news openly supports.
BBC is also vandalizing the name "Persian Gulf" by calling it "the Gulf," despite all the official United Nations legal documents/maps that suggest that the ONLY correct name for the gulf between Iran (Persia) and the Arabian Peninsula is, in fact, Persian Gulf. Not only this, the name Persian Gulf is a name that is part of the Persian heritage. Consequently, the BBC is violating international regulations and undermining its journalistic accuracy and trust. It also insults the Persian history!
you really care about the persian gulf its so important for you i dont understand why but what do you care about what other people calls it you call it whatever you like and i can call it gulf of hate im free
and about what you wrote in you channel there is many people love iran like my self but you dont find a persian loves the arabs. why? you people are full of hate
The BBC knows the score. America is blind to what its government is doing, if they captured Bin Laden then one of their major reasons for this war on terror would be lost.
He's worked for the CIA, he's been treated at US military hospitals. They know exactly where he is.
Example Robin Hood has been remade by the BBC as a family schedule prog. Friar Tuck has been written out ( too Christian!)and in his place a muslim,asian,female( ...minus burqa ) who is full of wise words,etc ( y'know the smart arse type!).The crusades likened to the war in Iraq with WMD,a war-mongering Pope likened to Bush,Killer priests,etc. Yawn! ...You get the picture
A pro-islamic, anti-christian agenda is being force fed to the British people by its media.
Easter ( important to all Christians ) goes largely unnoticed by the TV channels, Ramadan regularly gets coverage by the "it's great to be a muslim" brigade on both BBC and C4.
This clip just shows the tip of the iceberg!Thank goodness I'm not the only one who can see the BBC's anti-American/pro-islamic biased broadcasting, this propoganda is not confined to their "news/documentary" stuff but also to their entertainment progs. I'm not right-wing but I am Brit who can think independently and can reasonably assess whether the info supplied to me is impartial.
Enlighten me. How can you choose not to financially support them? Given that they are commercial broadcasters, you support them with every single product you buy. It would be impossible to ensure that a commercial broadcaster wouldn't receive your money.
"With other media outlets you can chose not to financially support them. American tax dollars go to support the biased Beeb (through NPR/PRI) yet they consistently vilify us."
I didn't know US citizens had to pay for their TV too!
Why don't you quote the rest of what he said?? I know exactly where you got that from and the piece as a whole is not anti-American in any way. Besides, Justin has a history of pro-US bias.
Yeah, cos what you didn't like was that the BBC broadcasted the truth. And, how can they be bias if these reports happened? Americans were hit the BBC website hard, primarily because they could not get the truth from American output, through the Iraq war, just look at Fox news!
Nah, what you didnt like is the fact that the BBC portrayed the reality of war, bringing the truth AND!! look at them now, THEY WERE RIGHT. Look at Iraq
Thank god for the BBC, I would never trust any other network.
The BBC is one of the most respected organisations in the world, not least because the quality and integrity of the service is maintained by the British public through the TV license fee, which every houshold in the country has to purchase. (This means no advertising at all, thank God) I have never seen a documentary or political show which was ever biased in recent years. Sure they have made gafs, then again they are human aswell.
what would you expect, wuth so many muslims audience, who really want to mess wuth them. we all see waht heppen whan a danish cartoonist did something thay dont like. 1.2 bilion muslims that have the privilige to kill terror, and burn ,against 15 milion jews. apperantly we are only see what the muslims will wont get angry about.
A truly pitiful effort. Of course the BBC is biased in favour of the UK and US and Israel, just not quite as much as the US channels so it horrifies the poor dupes who think Fox is fair and balanced.
2. Appears the maker has started out from the position of wanting to "prove" that there is an institutional bias at the BBC and so has taken quotes out of context (no matter how tenuously) to prove his/her opinion. Even give all this effort, it doesnt actually do anything other than to discredit the makers cause.
What piffle! The whole point is that their bias is veiled and covert; that way they aim to most effectively manipulate British people's opinions. In contrast, US News tend to give open opinions that the viewer can accept or reject; a far healthier approach.
Piffle. The major US news networks are owned by large pro-republican corporates, have massive market penetration and do not make any gestures to indicate they are overtly biased one way or another.
This shoddy attempt to use a few grabs out of context and drop them together fails to reflect the whole of the BBC output fairly, some of which is criticised by domestic politicians here for being to anti-war/anti-governement.
You really need to work a bit harder on your theory.
The terror of nightmares was a biased piece did bye a journalist, biased on Straus theories that fear will help you keep rule. Justin Webb who was once a BBC Washington correspondent wrote a piece about America that shows how some in BBC feel about America. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/4400865.stm read right above disagreement.
"When you question the news, we question the news makers" - Thats the biggest load of horse shit ever
ImperialismStop 11 months ago
Recently according to the Guardian, the BBC is now funded by US Sate Dept, its no surprise the quality of news and impartiality is pretty obvious with half a brain
ImperialismStop 11 months ago
cool story bro
cluch9 1 year ago
Don't watch the BBC news - it's completely biased in favour of Islam and the Left.
afewtube 1 year ago 2
bbc is a glove puppet of the hard left..
sneakeysmoker1 1 year ago 3
Would have been better if you could actually read the stuff presented.
DumblyBrilliant 2 years ago
All the british people remember about 7/7 is that an illegal alien was shot by the police a few days later, thanks to the BBC. Tossers!
MrBeefmuncher 2 years ago 2
You could say the BBC is the propaganda arm for the city of london international bankers who are responsible for 90% of strife in the world today. They control Drugs and Terrorism globally. The world would be a much better place if we eliminate this international banker menace out of the City of London.The BBC is especially disgraceful for their open support for the Narco-Terrorists the LTTE. The worst terrorists in the world a group the BBC propaganda news openly supports.
markjayaweera 3 years ago 7
BBC is also vandalizing the name "Persian Gulf" by calling it "the Gulf," despite all the official United Nations legal documents/maps that suggest that the ONLY correct name for the gulf between Iran (Persia) and the Arabian Peninsula is, in fact, Persian Gulf. Not only this, the name Persian Gulf is a name that is part of the Persian heritage. Consequently, the BBC is violating international regulations and undermining its journalistic accuracy and trust. It also insults the Persian history!
PersiaMyLove 3 years ago
you really care about the persian gulf its so important for you i dont understand why but what do you care about what other people calls it you call it whatever you like and i can call it gulf of hate im free
and about what you wrote in you channel there is many people love iran like my self but you dont find a persian loves the arabs. why? you people are full of hate
jaf8max 2 years ago
The BBC knows the score. America is blind to what its government is doing, if they captured Bin Laden then one of their major reasons for this war on terror would be lost.
He's worked for the CIA, he's been treated at US military hospitals. They know exactly where he is.
paranoia4132 3 years ago 5
"also to their entertainment progs"
Example Robin Hood has been remade by the BBC as a family schedule prog. Friar Tuck has been written out ( too Christian!)and in his place a muslim,asian,female( ...minus burqa ) who is full of wise words,etc ( y'know the smart arse type!).The crusades likened to the war in Iraq with WMD,a war-mongering Pope likened to Bush,Killer priests,etc. Yawn! ...You get the picture
Message Islam=good, christianity=bad
iceguyred123 4 years ago 2
A pro-islamic, anti-christian agenda is being force fed to the British people by its media.
Easter ( important to all Christians ) goes largely unnoticed by the TV channels, Ramadan regularly gets coverage by the "it's great to be a muslim" brigade on both BBC and C4.
iceguyred123 4 years ago
This clip just shows the tip of the iceberg!Thank goodness I'm not the only one who can see the BBC's anti-American/pro-islamic biased broadcasting, this propoganda is not confined to their "news/documentary" stuff but also to their entertainment progs. I'm not right-wing but I am Brit who can think independently and can reasonably assess whether the info supplied to me is impartial.
C4 and to a lesser extent ITV are just as guilty.
iceguyred123 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The creator of this video claims that they are biased cause of the fact that they allow people that arent bribed by USA come on the air.
GeorgeGallowayfan 4 years ago
Enlighten me. How can you choose not to financially support them? Given that they are commercial broadcasters, you support them with every single product you buy. It would be impossible to ensure that a commercial broadcaster wouldn't receive your money.
realkorova 4 years ago
"With other media outlets you can chose not to financially support them. American tax dollars go to support the biased Beeb (through NPR/PRI) yet they consistently vilify us."
I didn't know US citizens had to pay for their TV too!
millasvids 4 years ago
Why don't you quote the rest of what he said?? I know exactly where you got that from and the piece as a whole is not anti-American in any way. Besides, Justin has a history of pro-US bias.
ijclark76 4 years ago
Yeah, cos what you didn't like was that the BBC broadcasted the truth. And, how can they be bias if these reports happened? Americans were hit the BBC website hard, primarily because they could not get the truth from American output, through the Iraq war, just look at Fox news!
Nah, what you didnt like is the fact that the BBC portrayed the reality of war, bringing the truth AND!! look at them now, THEY WERE RIGHT. Look at Iraq
Thank god for the BBC, I would never trust any other network.
easy1355 5 years ago
Comment removed
economistBR 5 years ago
boring.. >_<
andyee 5 years ago
The BBC is one of the most respected organisations in the world, not least because the quality and integrity of the service is maintained by the British public through the TV license fee, which every houshold in the country has to purchase. (This means no advertising at all, thank God) I have never seen a documentary or political show which was ever biased in recent years. Sure they have made gafs, then again they are human aswell.
BBMix 5 years ago
Check out my vid about the BBC using license payers' money to block a damaging report of bias.
IslamExposed 5 years ago
what would you expect, wuth so many muslims audience, who really want to mess wuth them. we all see waht heppen whan a danish cartoonist did something thay dont like. 1.2 bilion muslims that have the privilige to kill terror, and burn ,against 15 milion jews. apperantly we are only see what the muslims will wont get angry about.
jckgkvzni 5 years ago
bbc sux
PillyPlonkins 5 years ago
A truly pitiful effort. Of course the BBC is biased in favour of the UK and US and Israel, just not quite as much as the US channels so it horrifies the poor dupes who think Fox is fair and balanced.
test915 5 years ago
Exposing Zionism and Terrorism
iamthewitness dot com
sega88 5 years ago
1. Very poor picture quality.
2. Appears the maker has started out from the position of wanting to "prove" that there is an institutional bias at the BBC and so has taken quotes out of context (no matter how tenuously) to prove his/her opinion. Even give all this effort, it doesnt actually do anything other than to discredit the makers cause.
pityacker 5 years ago
Firstly this isn't a video, it's a slide show. Secondly flashing up lots of website grabs and quotes, all out of context proves nothing.
LuthansaTerminal 5 years ago
Whoever created this video is a silly little man, the BBC is one of the most reliable, informative, non-bias channels in the world.
jessemoore 5 years ago
Check out my vid about the BBC using license payers' money to block a damaging report of bias.
IslamExposed 5 years ago
From the planet Zog, are we?
beebisbiasedbigtime 5 years ago
From the planet Zog, are we?
beebisbiasedbigtime 5 years ago
Even if the contents of this video could be accepted as true, the BBC is not a mark on the US network news channels, whose bias is not even veiled.
I'd trust the BBC over Fox any day.
me705709 5 years ago
What piffle! The whole point is that their bias is veiled and covert; that way they aim to most effectively manipulate British people's opinions. In contrast, US News tend to give open opinions that the viewer can accept or reject; a far healthier approach.
beebisbiasedbigtime 5 years ago
Piffle. The major US news networks are owned by large pro-republican corporates, have massive market penetration and do not make any gestures to indicate they are overtly biased one way or another.
This shoddy attempt to use a few grabs out of context and drop them together fails to reflect the whole of the BBC output fairly, some of which is criticised by domestic politicians here for being to anti-war/anti-governement.
You really need to work a bit harder on your theory.
me705709 5 years ago
The terror of nightmares was a biased piece did bye a journalist, biased on Straus theories that fear will help you keep rule. Justin Webb who was once a BBC Washington correspondent wrote a piece about America that shows how some in BBC feel about America. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/4400865.stm read right above disagreement.
Cymric1959 5 years ago
For more context on the battle with Radical Islam, see the award-winning film www.ObsessionTheMovie.com
ObsessionTheMovie 5 years ago
Comment removed
economistBR 5 years ago