9/11 Pentagon Damage - Good Quality Raw Stock Footage

[RichardRowell1]

Predator Drone, Global Hawk, or special drone w/ Airplane painted on in the shape of a rectangle. Not Boeing 757, prob not Northrop Gruman model, too big.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@RichardRowell1 There is no legit forensic evidence at the scene initially to support anything hitting the building. The building was pre-set for a demolition job, complete with smoke machines and hired media actors. The plane parts are planted. The interior shear face is clean, no broken concrete, rebar, or connections. The punchout hole has toolmarks around the perimeter of the hole. There is no evidence anything hit the building right after the crash, just a fat explosion

[RichardRowell1]

@IranContraScumDid911 That could have happened too, that means the footage of the 5 frames released is doctored...although obviously all the Osama bin Laden Intelcenter tapes are fabricated, etc.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@RichardRowell1 The impact video is fake, a blurry nothing where we see nothing. The whole video came from the people that staged the event, hardly can be trusted as objective. It came out YEARS later, while there are over 80 that can be confirmed that have still not been released. The forensic damage does not support much of a flying object hitting the building. Check out my new vid on the subject ... 9/11 Flight 77 Did Not Crash Into The Pentagon. Demolition charges caused collapse

[GeekTechMac1]

you know damn well the pentagon was the test site for a drone strike

[IranContraScumDid911]

@GeekTechMac1 I know it was a controlled demolition job, not sure if anything hit the building.

[weavepg21]

Thanks for the video. Shows the hard evidence without commentary. Interesting.

[Alaskaslim]

"Are you really telling me you believe words on a web page!!!! "

No, I believe the witnesses because I lived in D.C., and was a frequent visitor to the Pentagon.

"My Brain" counters your bullsh*t with knowing people I knew for years wouldn't lie to me when they talk about seeing their friends die, while surrounded by aircraft debris.

Ignore the witnesses? Fine, then don't expect me to listen. I don't take well to people who talk sh*t about those I know and respect.

[Alaskaslim]

@morklind F* ck it, here 's the videos since your so dense you can't look a little to the right: Pentagon cameras 1 & 2: /watch?v=L75Gga92WO8 /watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8 CitGo Gas station: /watch?v=2LJvFjsl6zk Doubletree Hotel 1 & 2: /watch?v=mseU9tpwxsA /watch?v=WlFaqmUO_j8 Here's a hand-hold for where three of these videos show the plane: /watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4 What, expecting something better? TOUGH, CCTV cameras circa mid-90s technology were sh*t quality, this is typical for the time.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Alaskaslim Too bad there was no plane crash at the scene.

[Alaskaslim]

@IranContraScumDid911

Only a plane fits the damage, there needed to be w wing spane large enough clip the lights, the generator, make the 90 feet of damage across, as well as be heavy enoughto push aside a 20 ton generator, and keep flying.

There's no missile that'll do that, the Tomahawk and it's puny engine would cry foul in trying.

Not to mention they found a hub disk over twice as wide as a Tomahawk engine.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Alaskaslim shut up, there was no plane crash. The forensic damage to the building and lack of airplane confirm this. All the rest of your bullshit is just suppporting the rape of the US Constitution and rebuilding the middle east. You were sucker punched, conned into working FOR Saudi Arabia and Israel to rebuild the middle east. They were never looking for the boogie man, he was fake. You got suckered, and you have all easily fake evidence but nothing real. Its pathetic.

[AlaskaFinal]

@IranContraScumDid "The forensic damage"

Read the ASCE report, you can't exactly overrule 120,000 American civil engineers just by saying so.

Counter what they have stated with the evidence, why is that a big deal?

"lack of airplane confirm this."

Lack of airplane? Hell, find this C-130, THEN tell me that:

911research . wtc7 . net/pentagon/analysis/compare/­c130crash . html

And that thing was flying HALF THE SPEED of 77, don't even try telling me this "odd".

[AlaskaFinal]

@AlaskaFinal

It's possible to be right, but make a crap argument. That's why guilty men go free.

If you're right, you're using all the wrong methods to convince me.

I don't want rhetoric, I want EVIDENCE, I want FACTS, and the Truth is, the Truth Movement GAVE UP on the Pentagon as a conspiracy due to the lack of either supporting their case.

Hell, I read some now who say that Pentagon is a real attack, and that the Gov't TRICKED them into thinking it wasn't to discredit them.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Alaskatroll There is more than enough evidence, its up to you to do resesrch. I can tell you first of all where to start. Start with Isaac Newton and the 400 year old, never disproven, laws of motion. Physics tells us what we should see but do not. The interior shear face is clean, NO BREAKS, no cracked concrete, no broken rebar, no broken fasteners or connections. The punchout has tool marks on the exterior limestone. You have a 25IQ, thats why you miss it. Dont bother replying

[AlaskaTemp]

@IranContraScumDid911

Wrong, if you have evidence, YOU need to bring it forward, I'm do NOT need to look for it FOR you. You cannot accuse someone that way in court, THAT is unconstitutional.

But one other thing, sorry, but I lived in D.C. when this happened, I've been to the Pentagon, I know people who were there, just look here:

i217 . photobucket . com/albums/cc160/AlaskaSlim/Al­aska%20Slim/Pentagon0938 . jpg

The people of our United States Army, call your bullsh*t.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@AlaskaFinal Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. You dont understand the laws of motion, nor do you understand the damage you are looking at. I am not even going o debate the subject, this is all years old stupid troll talk, solved long ago. The end result is you are supporting the rewriting of the US Constitution and a socialist gloabl muslim nation building project.

[AlaskaTemp]

@IranContraScumDid911

Sorry, but no. I got my degree in aviation, from bernoulli's principle, to ground effect, to weight & balance & dispatching, I' am well familiar with the physics of of aviation.

But do you know what else i was taught? HISTORY, Aviation HISTORY, and I know of at least 4 crashes just like this one.

Are saying those 4 are "conspiracies" as well? The Azari C-130? The '45 Empire State Building crash? The Dutch 747? American 191? History is against you.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@AlaskaTemp If I gave a solid reply that disproved everything you said you would not listen, you are wasting my time and spamming bullshit all over my video. Just leave, your troll bullshit fails to see the whole event unified gathering ALL the evidence, or lack of it, then unifying it. You graduated with a degree in aviation but cannot see the obvious. Its a joke, seriously. Basic childlike scientific observation says you are wrong. You are even wrong about your case study, sleeper

[morklind]

@Alaskaslim Pointless. You are blinded by your fear. LOOK at those videos with your eyes OPEN. You think I have not seen these videos? Quite apart from the fact that these cameras take 60 FPS and suddenly when the nose appears it goes down to 5. You are right Architects they dont need to refer to Pentagon. WTC 3 is smoking gun. If you conclude that was brought down by nefarious means - its a can of worms. But carry on in your world. You are content like sheep so get back in your pen.

[Alaskaslim]

@morklind "LOOK at those videos"

Right here, outline of a plane:

/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q#t=1m10s

No one saw a missile, no one saw a drone, the video backs up the witness statements.

You're trying to tailor your theory to escape the evidence, rather than acting THROUGH the evidence to prove your point.

So long as I know people who were there, and I do:

i217 . photobucket . com/albums/cc160/AlaskaSlim/Al­aska%20Slim/Pentagon0938 . jpg

I'm rather confident I know the truth.

[morklind]

So many smoking guns ... so many ignorant lazy jounalists. You'd think someone .. somewhere in this modern age .. would have seen a fucking big plane come down so low and then fly into the pentagon .. but no. Not one .. anywhere. Funny noone has picked up on that.

[Alaskaslim]

@morklind

There were over 100 witnesses to the plane crashing.

If you're complaining that no one had a video camera, you seem to for get

1. Camera phones weren't around then.

2. The Pentagon is a military installations, it does occasionally have tourists, but the numbers are completely different compared to New York

"Smoking guns", You don't know much about air traffic control then, and how the record show there isn't any.

[morklind]

@Alaskaslim WTH! who cares about mobile phones! This the Pentagon we are talking about! probably one of the most CCTV'd buildings on earth - look at the building - it is surrounded from everywhere and NOT ONE inch of footage has been released to shut up all the conspiracy theorist NOT ONE SECOND of footage! .. why not? WHY NOT??!! If only to stop the rumour mongers. 100 witnesses?! dont make me laugh!

[Alaskaslim]

@morklind

104 witnesses, right here:

sites . google . com/site/wtc7lies/911pentagonf­light77evidencesummary

These are the people who DIRECTLY saw it crash, and who gave their statements, I didn't pull that figure out of thin air.

20,000 people go to work at the Pentagon each day, frankly I'm surprised it wasn't more.

[morklind]

@Alaskaslim WTH is this! Sit down, have a coffee and a muffin and let your conscience speak to you. Are you really telling me you believe words on a web page!!!! FUCK! this is what is wrong with the American people!. Answer my question with YOUR BRAIN. ALL CCTV footage confiscated by FBI, 10 years later still not released. WHY? WT3 collapsed. 1,637 architects, engineers, physicist, academics = 1000's years of experience cant be ALL wrong. Wake up buddy.

[Alaskaslim]

@morkli

"ALL CCTV footage confiscated by FBI"

As what typically happens when a crime occurs on FEDERAL property.

Were you at all confused when the FBI confiscated the evidence for the OK city bombing? How about the IRS building crash? I mean who the F*ck else did you think it be?

"still not released"

Again, those videos are in the RELATED VIDEO LIST, so you need to STOP saying this. You're in DENIAL, or do I need to post the links directly?

Arichtect = said nothing on the Pentagon

[scammedbygov]

Surely someone on YouTube has a copy of the very first live footage (CNN) about 2 minutes after the so-call plane hit the pentagon. It's 30 seconds of "smoking gun" evidence. You will clearly see a perfect round hole in the wall before it collapsed and no wreckage. Cruise Missile was my guess at the time.

[Alaskaslim]

@scammedby

Cruise missile have high explosives, as such, they WOULD leave bigger holes ... nope, scratch that, it would have just taken down the entire section, and left a crater.

If you think this was a cruise missile, you never seen the afermath of one before.

If this replicates any weapon, it's solid kinetic penetrators, like the SABOTS fired from tanks.

Problem is, you can't make a missile in the usual sense out of it, they're too heavy, hence WHY they're fired from tanks.

[sir4ki]

wag the dog

[zenoist2]

Since it didnt go into the building where is the plane wreckage? Think of wings tailplane engines. Unfortunately for the official story they are part of your plane.

[lennhart]

@zenoist2 There never was a plane. A 757 has TWO TITANTIUM/STEEL ALLOY compressor rotors between 11 to 15 ft in diameter as I recall. Even if the plane was NUKED, the rotors would have been recovered; they are TRACEABLE. ONLY 1 rotor was found. It's 1/3 the size of the 2 larger rotors found on 757s. The ONLY ROTOR found is, rather, traced to a ROLLS-ROYCE engine that is used in the U.S. GLOBAL HAWK, a payload carrying missile that the U.S. flew from CA to Australia by remote control.

[Alaskaslim]

@lennhart

No, the ENGINES are 11 to 12 feet, the COMPRESSOR disks are only four, I have the damn schematic for the engines if you want to see, you recall wrong.

Global hawks don't use Rolls Royce engines, nor the RB211, which the debris was matched to.

Of the planes that use the RB211, the 757 is the smallest.

"a payload carrying missile "

Global Hawks are drones, not missiles, and it can't fly fast enough for people to mistake it for an airliner, it isn't big enough.

[NoNORADon911]

Boss de plane de plane? Tiss not here boss?

[lennhart]

@NoNORADon911 You are absolutely correct! There is no plane and never was one. Ali Baba's ...uh...Bin Laden's 19 hijackers DID NOT repeal the laws of physics with help from Allah.

[surfjerr]

@mrconradhoppe then it makes sense lol

[jayone451]

I'm sick of people blaming zionists for 9/11.... It was ordered by the Pope to kick start another blood thirsty crusade,the Jews are a scapegoat used by the Vatican. This tactic was even used in the bible by Pontious Pilot...Ashkenazi=European royalty

[TheCorruptA]

The mainstream media is a joke for ignoring the facts they are apart of the PROBLEM now

[longliveegypt1]

there is no plane and even if you turned the whole universe upside down you will not find any plane or any part of it the real enemy for you guys are zionist banker and the industrial complex

peace

[andyOsalek]

this is good

[surfjerr]

@mrconradhoppe lmao your a fool look up jet fuel and its burning capicity, It would only burn long enough to start fires not burn metal,

[DackIsBack]

Watch: "9/11 Commissioner slips up, says missile hit Pentagon"

/watch?v=o3LJXoXpAHE

[XANZYX]

Where is the plane?

[loosechangeexposed]

@XANZYX this video was taken after the plane had already vanished into the building, i explain exactly how it hit in my video "loose change answer number 053"

[IranContraScumDid911]

@loosechangeexposed The laws of motion prove the plane could not have "vanished" into the building". Watching "loose change answer number 053" would be serious waste of your time.

[lennhart]

@IranContraScumDid911 Laws of the conservation of matter and energy say that a craft of ANY MASS with leave that much MASS as debris. No one has ever said the Pent was nuked! Therefore --a conventional aircraft weighing -say --100 tons should leave 100 tons behind after factoring out spent fuel.NO ONE has ever traced a SCRAP to an airliner of any type, let alone, flt 77 which BTS and NTSB sez were not sked to fly. & no one DARES claim that better than 100 tons of wreckage was recovered.

[lennhart]

@loosechangeexposed NO plane 'vanished' into the building Matter does not VANISH. Mere kerosene fires DO NOT defy the laws of the conservation of matter and energy. Look that up at M.I.T. or any other reputable PHYSICS DEPARTMENT. Aircraft of any size DO NOT VANISH. Perhaps you believe that David Copperfield walked through the Great Wall of China and that other guy levitated over Las Vegas LOL LOL LOL

[akaknocksville]

@XANZYX YOU WONT WHEN IT WAS A MISSILE !!

[FreedumbFighter28]

Can it get anymore obvious? Really people...you have been betrayed.