They rigged the regulations at the expense of the public. I'm feeling it right now in the air, a tower less than 3 miles away, the SOB's didn't test it. The other night it was very loud ALL night, and I felt the signal washing over me!
I felt nothing at all until July 2008, then they started poisoning the air with this unsafe signal in BRANDON, FL!
Is it a MacDill AFB signal surrounding TAMPA, or is it this awful EVERYWHERE?
(I entirely understand if the average reader doesn't believe me, too!)
The most astonishing thing is that the cellular industry promised to do safety studies a decade and a half ago, but have not done them!
I wonder WHY they won't do public studies about the safety of this cellular CRAP, maybe their internal research pointed in the wrong direction, so they choose to pretend to be ignorant of the dangers, does that remind you of some other crooked industry, COUGH COUGH?
Our broken Free Market does not find the safest way to do things, only the most profitable.
Cell phone towers are considered 'non ionizing' radiation and as such is impossible to establish any cause or effect relationship by Govermental/Industrial regulations.
@rbolo29 - To add to what this person has said, "Non-ionizing (or non-ionising) radiation refers to any type of electromagnetic radiation that does not carry enough energy per quantum to ionize atoms or molecules—that is, to completely remove an electron from an atom or molecule." (source - wikipedia, or any decent science book).
In other words *really, really* weak.
Visible light is another example of non-ionising radiation. Are you going to call for warnings on torches too?
@frostek So if all non-ionizing radiation is too weak to really have an effect...why do they keep on going on about melanomas caused by too much exposure to ultra-violet radiation?
They rigged the regulations at the expense of the public. I'm feeling it right now in the air, a tower less than 3 miles away, the SOB's didn't test it. The other night it was very loud ALL night, and I felt the signal washing over me!
I felt nothing at all until July 2008, then they started poisoning the air with this unsafe signal in BRANDON, FL!
Is it a MacDill AFB signal surrounding TAMPA, or is it this awful EVERYWHERE?
(I entirely understand if the average reader doesn't believe me, too!)
MiKikaIwaShizaru 1 year ago
The most astonishing thing is that the cellular industry promised to do safety studies a decade and a half ago, but have not done them!
I wonder WHY they won't do public studies about the safety of this cellular CRAP, maybe their internal research pointed in the wrong direction, so they choose to pretend to be ignorant of the dangers, does that remind you of some other crooked industry, COUGH COUGH?
Our broken Free Market does not find the safest way to do things, only the most profitable.
MiKikaIwaShizaru 1 year ago
Repeal the 1996 Telecommunications Act!
NoKVCellTower 1 year ago
Please watch SANDAURA'S YOUTUBES.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND LINKS REGARDING THIS SERIOUS HEALTH HAZARD
Dr Robert O. Becker, M.D.
twice nominated for Nobel Prize of this research.
"I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time, the greatest
polluting element in the earth's environment is the proliferation of
electromagnetic fields.
I consider that to be far greater on a global scale, than warming, and
the increase in chemical elements in the environment."
sandaura 2 years ago
It's about time someone made a doc of this caliber. Now if only 4 billion people could see it....not to mention the US Congress.
ianjos 2 years ago 2
an important documentary...
jalusbrian 2 years ago 2
Cell phone towers are considered 'non ionizing' radiation and as such is impossible to establish any cause or effect relationship by Govermental/Industrial regulations.
rbolo29 2 years ago 2
@rbolo29 - To add to what this person has said, "Non-ionizing (or non-ionising) radiation refers to any type of electromagnetic radiation that does not carry enough energy per quantum to ionize atoms or molecules—that is, to completely remove an electron from an atom or molecule." (source - wikipedia, or any decent science book).
In other words *really, really* weak.
Visible light is another example of non-ionising radiation. Are you going to call for warnings on torches too?
frostek 7 months ago
@frostek So if all non-ionizing radiation is too weak to really have an effect...why do they keep on going on about melanomas caused by too much exposure to ultra-violet radiation?
GoCapture 6 months ago
Waiting with bated breath to see this doc! I'm telling all my friends!
pilotgirlproductions 2 years ago 2
@pilotgirlproductions
It is good, i got the DVD at fullsignalmovie dt com
MiKikaIwaShizaru 1 year ago