George W. Bush - on his book Decision Points

[apacheaviator1]

History will judge this man. This should be a lesson for severely unqualified people who want the office of president. There things much wore than losing the election. Winning for example. Now your ancestors must live with the disgrace.

[ilikebac0n]

as you see below in my other posts i have said he was a evil man, please stop disrespecting my dead family by praising the American government

It was the American government that abandoned the kurds after the first golf war allowing Saddam to use chemical weapons on them, American government = evil, especially bush

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

Okay, I didn't mean any disrespect. I didn't know this was personal to you, and I apologize for using offensive language earlier. I just have different views.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

You have retarded views, you believe the spin and stories of the neocon bush administration, the war had nothing to do with WMD's or bringing democracy, it was totally about Iraqs natural resources, American went to war on false pretense and now you're trying to justify it by "he tried to make wmds in the past" and "he was a bad man so its ok"

Hundreds of thousands are dead, Iraq is being bled try of its natural resources, people continue to die each day, how can you support murder

[ilikebac0n]

Oh look, a war criminal.

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n Go fuckin hang yourself, piece of shit. Find saddams dead body and suck him off, fuckin liberal

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

Im no liberal, I dont like Saddam either, typical response of a stupid person who doesnt understand the world

Im sorry if it hurts your feelings that bush is a war criminal that attacked Iraw on false claims to steal their natural resources, but thats the truth

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n First, its spelled Iraq. If you're going to accuse me of being stupid learn English first. Second, if Saddam was not in possession of weapons, why would he not let the United Nations Weapons Inspectors run their investigation?

I beileve we should've left Iraq after we took out Saddam and replaced him with a Democratic Government. We had no reason to stay there and rebuild, but not taking out Saddam is just plain stupid. He invaded Kuwait, had a stockpile of biological weapons

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n why the fuck weren't we going to beileve he didn't have WMDs? The war wasn't illegal. The Un had a vote, Saddam had fuckin 48 hours to get out of his country otherwise we were going to attack. Yet he stayed.

He was a dictator, if we follow your logic and he was able to make WMDs, the first thing he would do is use them on Iran. It would essentially create a huge problem in the Middle East. Instead, we took him out, and Democracy did eventually come to that region

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

"The war wasn't illegal"

Wrong, I remember last year reading a Inquiry saying the conflict had no sound mandate in international law, one of several Inquiry's, google it.

"why the fuck weren't we going to believe he didn't have WMDs" Because the was no evidence he had WMD or current WMD programs, Saddam was a horrible man but this does not mean he had WMD's

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

If Saddam wasn't in the process of making them, why would he deny the UN from investigating? Google up UN Security Resolution 1441, basically it told Saddam to cooperation to weapons inspectors otherwise he was going to get attacked, and he chose not to cooperate.

Why the fuck would he not cooperate if he wasn't making WMDs? He knew he would get bombed, his country destroyed, and he would lose everything if he didn't cooperate. You're a fucking retard for thinking he was a saint.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

I dont think he was a saint, as you see below he was a evil man, many of my family died when he used chemical weapons against the kurds, he didnt cooperate because he was a troll.

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

I'm sorry to hear about your family, but your last point doesn't make any sense.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

ive said many times that saddam is evil, bush was more evil.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

"the first thing he would do is use them on Iran"

A:Your evidence for this? Saddam was evil but not stupid, if he launched WMD's at any country he would have been wiped off the face of the earth probably by Israel

"First, its spelled Iraq"

Are you really stupid enough not to work out the "q" and "w" are next to each other and this was a typeo... you did however fuck up with"beileve" but im not going to claim this was a spelling error as a cheap shot.

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

"Are you really stupid enough not to work out the "q" and "w" are next to each other and this was a typeo... you did however fuck up with"beileve" but im not going to claim this was a spelling error as a cheap shot."

Don't call me stupid when you can't type right in the first place. I wouldn't have called you out on Iraq, but if you're going to call me stupid, than you're fuckin retarded for not knowing how to type right. Btw theres an apostrophe in I'm, you spelled "typeo" wrong

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

Taimoor Khan, you're so angry

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

"He was a dictator, if we follow your logic and he was able to make WMDs" Being a dictator does not mean you want WMD, Is Israel, France, America and the UK dictatorships? no, they all have WMD however "Instead, we took him out, and Democracy did eventually come to that region"

Yes, democracy was brought by bombing a country into submission, installing a pro western government hahahhahahahaha the irony

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

Having a pro-western democracy is a hell lot better than leaving a dictator there who had biological weapons and wasn't afraid to use them on his own people. And you asked me for evidence as to why Saddam would build nuclear weapons? Maybe, because in 1990-1991, the UN had found Chemical weapons and equipment for a Nuclear Weapons program. Portugal and Niger had both supplied Iraq with "Yellowcake" which is basically a step before processing Uranium. All signs pointed to it.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

How is invading a country and putting a gorernment in power via corrupt elections a "democracy ".

"1990-1991, the UN had found Chemical weapons and equipment for a Nuclear Weapons program"

1991, a program that was no longer running, the international community knew was no longer running, i cant believe you bought into the pentagons bullshit lol, jesus fuck. stop watching glenn beck

[Tekay92]

@ilikebac0n

Being a dictator does not mean you want a WMD? Why not? If he didn't want one, why would he deny the UN from investigating if he had a nuclear weapons program or not?

Sure those countries don't, but North Korea [Dictatorship], Pakistan [Dictatorship for all intents and purposes] have nuclear weapons. Iran has been found developing them in 2003, and just had recently stopped, because of international pressure.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

Taimoor Khan, stop trying to paint saddam is a wmd crazed dictator to justify invading his country illegally, you're so crazy

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

"Being a dictator does not mean you want a WMD? Why not? "

What im trying to get you to understand is that dictators sometimes want wmds, other times dont, you to assume that because Saddam was evil he wanted WMDS, Not true, Saddam was happy to let the world think he had wmds, he did not tho.

[ilikebac0n]

@Tekay92

"he war wasn't illegal. The Un had a vote"

I that the un resoution that Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan, said, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal." LOL