F-4 Phantom Test

[Exagerative]

Phantom is smaller than a 757 american genius.

[Macthought]

As an explanation for why no plane was seen at the Pentagon this vid leaves lots of questions. What happened after this shot? Let's see the dust settling, the impact on the concrete wall. Was a round hole punched through? If the plane vaporized as stated, how did it go through 2 more walls and leave a hole in the C ring? and fling a piece onto the Pentagon lawn? Why did this plane explode into dust but the Pentagon plane exploded into a fireball as per the 5 frames? Yes, lots unanswered.

[Merlin5x5]

@Macthought

Yeah, actually, there were many photos of the pentagon post impact.

BUILDING, PENTAGON, JASON INGERSOLL 9/11 PENTAGON PICS

dodmedia. osd. mil/ Assets/ Still/ 2002/ Marines/

Pentagon attack pics are in the upper range, ie

DM-SD-02-03900. JPEG

[datzfast]

@Macthought try common sense .

[wcr4]

I'd love to see full speed with sound

[LambadLambadLambda]

Any of you guys notice that the WINGS sliced through the concrete in tact?

[datzfast]

@LambadLambadLambda that wing went through air beside the block now stop it.

[areyoulookinatmepal]

i,ve seen a vid about this crash a few years ago of before and after the crash,the wall clearly shows the wing indentations,there were no indentations of the wings on the pentagon.

[areyoulookinatmepal]

@areyoulookinatmepal

btw,i was never able to find that vid again

[Merlin5x5]

@areyoulookinatmepal

Yes, there were wing indentations at the Pentagon.

They were pointed out by the Washington Post the very next day.

Here is the Jason Ingersol picture that can prove BOTH the

wing indentations, and the impact points of both engines.

Here is the header.

dodmedia.osd. mil/ Assets/ Still/2002/ Marines/

Here is the jpeg

DM-SD-02-03900.JPEG

As you can see, the Airplane hit the ROAD in front of the pentagon, tearing it up, including a trench to AC machines.

[areyoulookinatmepal]

@Merlin5x5

i see the wing indentations in those pics.thanks

i still wonder where two rolls royce titanium engines went

[Merlin5x5]

@areyoulookinatmepal

ONE was recovered right by the two burning cars, and cleared away to aid in the rescue and fire response. (LEFT)

The second, (RIGHT) hit column 19 (The round scar nearly on the second floor), then followed the airframe into the building.

You can see the Indentation HOLE it made as it was dragged inside.

THE ENTIRE FACE of the pentagon, was pushed EIGHT feet deep into the building, it's NOT a painted black hole, like a cartoon.

Look at the Pentagon Building Perf Rpt.

[KD5XB]

Wheres all the wreckage? What about the engines? There HAS to be something left other than the wing tips and fin cap! I SMELL A CONSPIRACY! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!! THE F-4 CRASH WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!

[APiceOfPie]

its clearly a plan hitting a wall you can change that fact

[d6hd8kkd99]

People who believe this is all some complex conspiracy have been watching too many movies. In real life, they are just too many ways for this "conspiracy" to unravel.

It's good to be skeptical, but you have to understand the evidence before you can dismiss it or accept it. So many of these people simply don't understand what they're seeing.

[MadWorld05]

@d6hd8kkd99 what's funny is that you don't understand the simple laws of physics and if you do the equations are readily available for your scrutiny. the real math does not match the fake story.

[d6hd8kkd99]

MadWorld, are you trying to turn this into something personal? Why? How about proving your point instead of telling me what I understand or don't understand. Show me the math, dude.

[d6hd8kkd99]

Justgonnastay

I have to agree with you. I have heard missiles, too, White Sands, while I worked with Gen Dynamics. I remembered this F4 video from years ago, and came here to get the link for a friend I'm discussing the Pentagon crash with.

I've also been a forensic eng analyzing crashes and fires for nearly 30 years, plus I was a skeptic initially re: a lot of the reports of 9/11.

I'm no longer a skeptic.

[justgonnastay]

I've heard people say it sounded like a missile. How many of you have actually heard a missile except in a movie? I have. How many of you have heard an airliner pass 100 ft overhead at 400+ miles per hour? What does that sound like? It's amazing what people will look for and thus find.

[justgonnastay]

The pentagon had reinforced concrete walls, but nowhere near this strength. They would mostly stop a plane, but there would definitely be penetration. Any idea how a plane is put together? It's actually a pretty flimsy structure once you turn it into a weapon. Know where the bulk of the mass is? Lower half of the fuselage.

[jvmiam]

Some of you need to put your tinfoil hats back on.

[curlykasimir]

since when are the walls of the pentagon the same as the walls of the nuclear power plant? thats what is this plane crash video all about, it shows how strong the wall is, while the pentagon had holes in the walls. holes!

[imnoidiot5]

it goes into the block---is that physics or what?????

im a teenage student, so don diss me

[GOgetAIDSlulz]

because if its on the internet its TRUE!!!!! god i hate these 911 fuck heads

[GreatHakuProductions]

Dumbass. Stop putting out your disinfo strawmans you scum. No one says that everything on the internet is true. People say that anything coming from a credible source or documentation, online or offline, is verifiable.

Stop making illusions about the 9/11 truth movement (Like saying we all think that everything on the internet is true).

[Anonymous4912]

i've seen this test done several times in different locations with the same plane and same thickness of concrete wall ... it's true

[acvacaaa]

The plance forces the concrete block back and causes damage. And a commercial airlniner is 162,400 kg, while a F4 is 13,757 kg. But down with this offensive lanugauge. Be polite.

[C3POROBOT]

If you believe this explains the Pentagon, you're an idiot.

[iavakx85sam]

only sad, pathetic and sick people think the u.s government was behind these attacks. Please all of you just die or move to another country and make up horrible lies about their leaders

[95civicdxxx]

its not us Patriots that made Bush lie, his puppet masters did. Look up Pentagon Cordite. Look up NORAD stand down. Look up PNAC and "new pearl harbor". the bush adminstration planned this before Bush took office, its actually been in the making since they were in school. 35+ years

[eviscero]

srsly?

[glennid10t]

but...thanks for posting

[glennid10t]

A plane didn't hit the Pentagon. Remember how everyone was saying they smelled cordite? that's a rocket propellant, not used in Airliners.

[1HEXJUMPER]

EVERYONE was not saying they smelled something like

C_O_R_D_I_T_E_!

there was a big fire afterwards burning all kinda stuff inside the part hit of the pentagon

[glennid10t]

ok...not "everyone", but "multiple" military personnel are quoted saying the smell of cordite was present IMMEDIATELY after impact. btw, cordite doesn't smell like burning office furniture.

I doubt you'll try this...google "pentagon cordite". If you do, I accept your apology in advance, because you're swallowing the same spoon fed information that most intellectually challenged people feel the need to believe, so it's not completely your fault. You can find the truth with just a little effort.

[1HEXJUMPER]

what do you know about smells of aircraft exploding in a big fireball ? (jetpetrol plus hydraulic oil plus cooling oil plus chemical toiletliquid plus liquid tolietsoap plus catering food/liquids...)

you just try to building a fixious cardhouse without ANY foundations.

spreading paranoia does'nt help against the islam terrorists !

[glennid10t]

Actually, I know more about Cordite, Jet fuel, Kerosene, and Liquid Oxygen, than toilet chemicals, having retired from JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratories).

So, tell me...how much do you know about jet fuel, burning carpet, and cordite to defend your position?

Just google it..."pentagon cordite"...I dare you!

[1HEXJUMPER]

i doubt 100% that you ever have worked for the J.P.L. !!!!!!!!!you would never ever have passed the tests and intervieuws to check you out for a beginning and the compagny's shrink would have observed you from the start due to your weird paranoia behaviour!

[glennid10t]

yup...you're a smart one! Hope that works well for you.

[Merlin5x5]

@glennid10t

That would be the CORDITE that stopped being manufactured in England, in the 1950s, and was never used by the US at all, wouldn't it? The US always preferred Composition A and Composition B, used from WW1 thru Vietnam. The scent of burning houses, or fuels is carbon and sulfur, and both are present in Jet Fuel A. SO, apparently you don't know jackshit about cordite either.

[95civicdxxx]

this doesn't prove anything about the Boeing that Did NOT hit the pentagon. There was found a small engine at the pentagon site, this SMALL engine does not.. WOULD NOT.. could NOT fit the BOEING 747,757, 767, or 777 planes, they all have LARGE engines, 2 of them.

[1HEXJUMPER]

there is remarcable good footage of airplane remnants

WITHIN the pentagon ruine !

clearly recognisable are airplaneparts of the said crashed airplane.

all the other (ridiculous) rumours are 100% PURE BULLSHIT !

[95civicdxxx]

so where are these pictures? all I've seen are the pictures of a small engine, and there were 85 tapes of the pentagon FBI confiscated, why have they only released 5? 1 with a missing frame, the others you can't barely see whats happening. This is the most secure building in the entire planet, you're saying photos/video doesn't exist?! Send me a message, showing proof of the Boeing plane.