If those poor souls who went to work at WTC 1 & 2 that day where murderd to justify war & clear real estate space while getting rid of two buildings that where loseing millions on basic upkeep. Any of us would be sacrificed too. We have to power to force change. Now that they've taken away our right to privacy they'll never give it back. They'll keep pulling this war on terror out of their ass every time the subject comes up.
Look up this subject at 911review[dot]com. Calls were apparently made, but not necessarily with cell phones. Refer to that website, for I don't recall the details. And the editor of that site does support Dr Ray Griffin on much, not being anti-Griffin at all, really. There's more analysis on the phone calls though.
BUT, it isn't likely that the 9/11 "attack planes" were really hijacked. NORAD would [never] permit such long-distance hijackings ! They were LONG.
JFK assassination ? Not by LHO, and very likely not the CIA alone. LHO was a patsie sort of figure.
Moon landing ?
Who cares about whether that history is true or not ? It has nothing to do with 9/11 !
These two historical stories have nothing to do with 9/11 ! There might be a little relationship between JFK assassination and 9/11, but it's DISTRACTION from investigation of 9/11 !
Tell me where the fuck the wings are? Where the fuck is the tail? Plains crash into the ground and the ocean all the damn time. There is always wings. There is always tails. There is nothing at the Pentagon and there is nothing in that field. Airplanes do not just evaporate. Buildings DO NOT fall like that unless explosives are placed at key points throughout the structures. Physics does not lie. WAKE UP. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! We have been lied to and murdered in cold blood.
Whether or not this is true, every government of every country in the world constantly lies and covers up stuff, and kills people to keep their secrets. That is how power works, that is what greed creates. You have to be unimaginably ignorant and naive to not believe that.
I should clarify - the CBC anchor seems to be buying it until the Bingham moment. He didn't really put up a fight until that time. He goes off on the "professor" in part 4, much to his credit.
I hope there's footage of these guys telling Mark Bingham's mother or Cee Cee Lyles's husband that the last words they heard from their loved one's before they died were faked. And I love how the "professor" tries to cite Bingham, but didn't know the guy's name. It's an important detail if you're going to cite it as a fake call. I wonder about the CBC anchor - he seems to be buying what they're saying.
This is the most grotesque group of the Truth Movement. Truly disgusting human beings.
Cee Cee sounded SOOO staged. If someone had my muther fuckin plane hijacked, I would be whispering with a forceful panic in a full blown anxiety attack.
It all sounded fake maybe with exception to the "bye". I don't know, I am so tired of this 9-11 bullshit. Reality is SO f'n weird.
@NATOvsENEMIES Oh c'mon. Eg. I have a very clear opinion about the neo cons and the bush doctrine and so on. I am fully aware about the unjustice of the war on Iraq. The bush administration has been lying and deceiving. But that's a totally unrelated topic. The evidence clearly shows, that the buildings collapsed due to the planes.
I believed in the inside job hypothesis (basically, because it would have suited the bush administration so well.)
@NATOvsENEMIES "The evidence clearly shows, that the buildings collapsed due to the planes." LOL, no it doesn't. The evidence clearly shows it was more likely the buildings collapsed due to explosives. Stop being a mindless, kool-aid drinking sheep.
@OkGoJays32 >"The evidence clearly shows it was more likely the buildings collapsed due to explosives"
That's what a fringe minority of experts says. Since you are not an expert, I wonder how you can be so confident. Well, actually I don't, cause I understand what confirmation bias is.
Anyway, have you ever asked yourself why the planners of this alleged inside job decided to use both: explosives and planes? Obviously, either one would have been enough to justify a war on terror.
If those poor souls who went to work at WTC 1 & 2 that day where murderd to justify war & clear real estate space while getting rid of two buildings that where loseing millions on basic upkeep. Any of us would be sacrificed too. We have to power to force change. Now that they've taken away our right to privacy they'll never give it back. They'll keep pulling this war on terror out of their ass every time the subject comes up.
mrh785 3 months ago
Cell phone calls ?
Look up this subject at 911review[dot]com. Calls were apparently made, but not necessarily with cell phones. Refer to that website, for I don't recall the details. And the editor of that site does support Dr Ray Griffin on much, not being anti-Griffin at all, really. There's more analysis on the phone calls though.
BUT, it isn't likely that the 9/11 "attack planes" were really hijacked. NORAD would [never] permit such long-distance hijackings ! They were LONG.
mikecorbeil 6 months ago
JFK assassination ? Not by LHO, and very likely not the CIA alone. LHO was a patsie sort of figure.
Moon landing ?
Who cares about whether that history is true or not ? It has nothing to do with 9/11 !
These two historical stories have nothing to do with 9/11 ! There might be a little relationship between JFK assassination and 9/11, but it's DISTRACTION from investigation of 9/11 !
Such distraction is obstruction of justice !
mikecorbeil 6 months ago
Tell me where the fuck the wings are? Where the fuck is the tail? Plains crash into the ground and the ocean all the damn time. There is always wings. There is always tails. There is nothing at the Pentagon and there is nothing in that field. Airplanes do not just evaporate. Buildings DO NOT fall like that unless explosives are placed at key points throughout the structures. Physics does not lie. WAKE UP. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! We have been lied to and murdered in cold blood.
hnoss13 6 months ago
Shut everyone up by having another investigation. has professionals from both sides.
herbert7711 6 months ago
Whether or not this is true, every government of every country in the world constantly lies and covers up stuff, and kills people to keep their secrets. That is how power works, that is what greed creates. You have to be unimaginably ignorant and naive to not believe that.
Hanske90 9 months ago
"Mark Bingham, whatever." What a despicable piece of trash.
jackednpumped 10 months ago
I should clarify - the CBC anchor seems to be buying it until the Bingham moment. He didn't really put up a fight until that time. He goes off on the "professor" in part 4, much to his credit.
siralex1983 1 year ago
I hope there's footage of these guys telling Mark Bingham's mother or Cee Cee Lyles's husband that the last words they heard from their loved one's before they died were faked. And I love how the "professor" tries to cite Bingham, but didn't know the guy's name. It's an important detail if you're going to cite it as a fake call. I wonder about the CBC anchor - he seems to be buying what they're saying.
This is the most grotesque group of the Truth Movement. Truly disgusting human beings.
siralex1983 1 year ago 2
@siralex1983 Yeah I agree. Fake phone calls is sick. But 9/11 was for sure an inside job.
ChristianHolloway7 1 year ago
Cee Cee sounded SOOO staged. If someone had my muther fuckin plane hijacked, I would be whispering with a forceful panic in a full blown anxiety attack.
It all sounded fake maybe with exception to the "bye". I don't know, I am so tired of this 9-11 bullshit. Reality is SO f'n weird.
bdmenne 1 year ago
I wouldn't be this calm during a hijacking, nor would I need to explain to my loved one that I am ON A PLANE!
chrychek 1 year ago
@NATOvsENEMIES Oh c'mon. Eg. I have a very clear opinion about the neo cons and the bush doctrine and so on. I am fully aware about the unjustice of the war on Iraq. The bush administration has been lying and deceiving. But that's a totally unrelated topic. The evidence clearly shows, that the buildings collapsed due to the planes.
I believed in the inside job hypothesis (basically, because it would have suited the bush administration so well.)
But the evidence doesn't support that hypothesis.
smarthandsomeguy 1 year ago
Comment removed
OkGoJays32 6 months ago
@NATOvsENEMIES "The evidence clearly shows, that the buildings collapsed due to the planes." LOL, no it doesn't. The evidence clearly shows it was more likely the buildings collapsed due to explosives. Stop being a mindless, kool-aid drinking sheep.
OkGoJays32 6 months ago
@OkGoJays32 >"The evidence clearly shows it was more likely the buildings collapsed due to explosives"
That's what a fringe minority of experts says. Since you are not an expert, I wonder how you can be so confident. Well, actually I don't, cause I understand what confirmation bias is.
Anyway, have you ever asked yourself why the planners of this alleged inside job decided to use both: explosives and planes? Obviously, either one would have been enough to justify a war on terror.
smarthandsomeguy 5 months ago
Grifiincant belive the calls but believes in his invisible friend
Obelisk2290 2 years ago