99.9% of the time there is another Aircraft that is carrying a TALD or an ITALD (Tactical Air Launched Decoy) they jettison the decoy and it takes off (like a missile at first then glides in a straight path) the 2nd Aircraft lets the TALD get distance then fires the AIM-120, AIM-9m/x or any other Air Intercept Missile at the TALD. They rarely shoot at drones, way to expensive..
Drones most likely. They're militarized versions of R/C aircraft. Larger than toys and painted orange for high visibility.
That, or old decommissioned fighters now relegated to being used as target practice. The F4 Phantom has been used extensively for this purpose. Strap on radio controls for it, and it's good to go. Although, I'd wish instead of them destroying it, they'd let me have one.
Si observan bien se daran cuenta que es un video trucado, pues se aprecia en tiempo real que el misil sale hacia adelante demasiado postizo y al compararlo con la camara lenta que si es el real veran que alli si aparece la expulsion de gases muy notoria, nientras que en tiempo real no se aprecia el mas minimo destello de gases expulsados, es una propaganda emgañosa, como todo lo que venden los gringos, es un montaje barato, para que nos impresionemos, pero no todos somos ignorantes en este mundo
No, los gases no se ven porque la calidad del video no lo permite. Es decir que la cantidad de cuadros por segundo no son los suficientes como para que podamos ver los gases en la toma de tiempo real, pero si en la toma de camara lenta.
Gracias Vaico, acabo de abrir mi correo y ver tu excelente respuesta un dia despues de que usted amablemente me la envio, lo mas sorprendente es que hace exactamente un año yo hice esta pregunta.
Gracias por su observacion, ya que verifique lo que usted dice en su correo y es absolutamente veridico.
World Against War -- join the global demonstration March 15th
Please join us, tell your friends, workmates and neighbours and make sure that on Saturday March 15 George Bush and Gordon Brown cannot ignore the fact that the world is against their wars.
99.9% of the time there is another Aircraft that is carrying a TALD or an ITALD (Tactical Air Launched Decoy) they jettison the decoy and it takes off (like a missile at first then glides in a straight path) the 2nd Aircraft lets the TALD get distance then fires the AIM-120, AIM-9m/x or any other Air Intercept Missile at the TALD. They rarely shoot at drones, way to expensive..
x2XCorpsX3x 2 months ago
good fighter
ahmed33980 7 months ago
O.o missle looks small and skinny
ervin920 1 year ago
@ervin920 like your dick mahahahahahah
graham1996 6 months ago
@graham1996 lol good one. but just so you know, my dicks big. would missile be considered the dicks of jets?
ervin920 6 months ago
@ervin920 you have a great humor not alot of ppl have that and you have a great point
graham1996 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@graham1996 well i am 14 years old
ervin920 6 months ago
AMRAAM
- Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile
DreamAboutSpace 2 years ago
fox three
missile away
fishguitar11 2 years ago
whats it shooting?
quangphangbang 3 years ago
Drones most likely. They're militarized versions of R/C aircraft. Larger than toys and painted orange for high visibility.
That, or old decommissioned fighters now relegated to being used as target practice. The F4 Phantom has been used extensively for this purpose. Strap on radio controls for it, and it's good to go. Although, I'd wish instead of them destroying it, they'd let me have one.
rpenri 2 years ago 2
Si observan bien se daran cuenta que es un video trucado, pues se aprecia en tiempo real que el misil sale hacia adelante demasiado postizo y al compararlo con la camara lenta que si es el real veran que alli si aparece la expulsion de gases muy notoria, nientras que en tiempo real no se aprecia el mas minimo destello de gases expulsados, es una propaganda emgañosa, como todo lo que venden los gringos, es un montaje barato, para que nos impresionemos, pero no todos somos ignorantes en este mundo
almopa1958 3 years ago
No, los gases no se ven porque la calidad del video no lo permite. Es decir que la cantidad de cuadros por segundo no son los suficientes como para que podamos ver los gases en la toma de tiempo real, pero si en la toma de camara lenta.
vaico 2 years ago
Gracias Vaico, acabo de abrir mi correo y ver tu excelente respuesta un dia despues de que usted amablemente me la envio, lo mas sorprendente es que hace exactamente un año yo hice esta pregunta.
Gracias por su observacion, ya que verifique lo que usted dice en su correo y es absolutamente veridico.
Hasta pronto
almopa1958 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World Against War -- join the global demonstration March 15th
Please join us, tell your friends, workmates and neighbours and make sure that on Saturday March 15 George Bush and Gordon Brown cannot ignore the fact that the world is against their wars.
More Info
/watch?v=wM9tu2w0Fow
TyroneSandalphon 4 years ago
fag
jbandre09 4 years ago 6
I don't get it.
What has this to do with the rabbits in china ?
PYTHAGORAS101 4 years ago